Lodging-resistance Comparison Among Sumer Maize Varieties with Different Growth Period in North of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.1058

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to resolve the serious lodging promblem of summer maize in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain under current trend of full mechanized cultivation，7 summer maize varieties （2 early-maturing varieties， 3 medium maturing varieties and 2 late maturing varieties） with different growth period were used to compare the lodging-resistance at grain filling period. The results showed that the plant height， ear height， ear height coefficient， length and K content of the basal 3^rd internode of summer maize were not related to growth period. The contents of water soluble carbohydrate in middle and early maturing varieties were significantly higher than that in late maturing varieties. The diameter and puncture strength of the basal 3^rd internode， the number of nodes near the ground and the total plant， the bending strength and the vertical root-pulling resistance of the plant in middle and late maturing varieties were significantly higher than those of the early maturing varieties. Correlation analysis showed that there was significantly negative correlation between plant bending strength and ear height coefficient， and significantly positive correlation between plant total root number per plant. Puncture intensity of the basal 3^rd internode was positively correlated with K content. Therefore， we should not only pay attention to faster grain filling and dehydration rate， but also pay attention to appropriate plant height， lower ear height and higher diameter of the basal internode， at the same time， suitable cultivation measures with inhibition of basal internode elongation， promoting the internode enlargement and enrichment and root development， which should be used to improve the ability of plant resistance to lodging. Above results provided theory basis for breeding with high yield， lodging resistance and grain harvest mechanization of summer maize.

Key words: North of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, summer maize, varieties, maturing, lodging

摘要：

在玉米全程机械化栽培趋势下，针对黄淮海平原区夏玉米倒伏严重问题，以7个不同生育期夏玉米品种（中晚熟2个，中熟3个，中早熟2个）为材料，探讨不同熟性夏玉米品种灌浆期的抗倒伏能力。结果表明，黄淮海平原北部夏玉米植株株高、穗位高、穗高系数、基部第3节间长及基部节间K含量与品种熟性无关；中熟、中早熟品种水溶性碳水化合物含量明显大于中晚熟品种；中熟、中晚熟品种基部第3节间粗、近地面两层节根数、单株总根条数、植株抗拉力、基部第3节间穿刺强度及植株根拔力显著大于早熟品种。相关性分析表明，夏玉米植株抗拉力与穗高系数呈显著负相关，与单株总根数呈显著正相关；基部第3节间穿刺强度与节间K含量呈正相关。因此，黄淮海平原北部选育机收粒夏玉米品种时，除关注灌浆、脱水速率快之外，还应兼顾株高适宜、穗位低、基部节间粗壮等抗倒性状，同时，采用适宜栽培措施，抑制基部节间伸长、促进节间增粗及充实、加强根系发育，提高植株抗倒伏能力。研究结果为黄淮海平原北部高产、抗倒、机收粒夏玉米品种选育提供理论依据。

关键词: 黄淮海平原北部, 夏玉米, 品种, 熟性, 倒伏

CLC Number:

S513

Yajun YUAN, Jiaxing FENG, Qifan YANG, Xue BAI, R A J PUSHPA, Dahong BIAN, Yanhong CUI. Lodging-resistance Comparison Among Sumer Maize Varieties with Different Growth Period in North of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 21-28.

苑雅俊, 冯家兴, 杨启帆, 白雪, PUSHPA R A J, 边大红, 崔彦宏. 黄淮海平原北部不同熟性夏玉米品种抗倒伏能力研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(7): 21-28.

Figures/Tables 7

References 21

1	曹庆军,曹铁华,杨粉团,等.灌浆期风灾倒伏对玉米籽粒灌浆特性及品质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(9): 1107-1113.
	CAO Q J, CAO T H, YANG F T, et al.. Effect of wind damage on grain-filling characteristics, grain quality and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2013, 21(9): 1107-1113.
2	乔宏伟,武月莲,宋凤波,等.主要病害及倒伏对夏玉米产量影响的研究[J].现代农业科学, 2009, 16(2): 100-101, 111.
	QIAO H W, WU Y L, SONG F B, et al.. Study on the effect of main diseases and lodging on yield of summer maize [J]. Modern Agric. Sci., 2009, 16(2): 100-101, 111.
3	李树岩,王宇翔,胡程达,等.抽雄期前后大风倒伏对夏玉米生长及产量的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2405-2413.
	LI S Y, WANG Y X, HU C D, et al.. Effects of strong wind lodging at pre-and post-tasseling stages on growth and yield of summer maize [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2015, 26(8): 2405-2413.
4	ELMORE R W, FERGUSON R B. Mid-season stalk breakage in corn: hybrid and environmental factors [J]. J. Prod. Agric., 1999, 12(2): 293-299.
5	边大红,刘梦星,牛海峰,等.施氮时期对黄淮海平原夏玉米茎秆发育及倒伏的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12): 2294-2304.
	BIAN D H, LIU M X, NIU H F, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application times on stem traits and lodging of summer maize (Zea mays L.) in the huang-huai-hai plain [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(12): 2294-2304.
6	耿爱军,杨建宁,张兆磊,等.国内外玉米收获机械发展现状及展望[J].农机化研究, 2016(4): 251-257.
	GENG A J, YANG J N, ZHANG Z L, et al.. Discuss about the current situation and future of corn harvest machinery about domestic and abroad [J]. J. Agric. Mach. Res., 2016(4): 251-257.
7	李少昆.我国玉米机械粒收质量影响因素及粒收技术的发展方向[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(3): 265-272.
	LI S K. Factors affecting the quality of maize grain mechanical harvest and the development trend of grain harvest technology [J]. J. Shihezi Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2017, 3(35): 265-272.
8	李姝彤,边大红,何璐,等.黄淮海夏玉米倒伏及化控抗倒技术研究进展[J].玉米科学, 2018, 26(3): 95-101.
	LI S T, BIAN D H, HE L, et al.. Lodging characteristics of summer maize (Zea mays L.) and chemical control research progresses preventing lodging in the North China Plain [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2018, 26(3): 95-101.
9	郝玉波,于洋,钱春荣,等.不同熟期玉米品种茎秆抗倒伏特性研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2020(12): 14-18.
	HAO Y B, YU Y, QIAN C R, et al.. Study on anti-lodging character of maize hybrids differing in maturities [J]. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci., 2020(12): 14-18.
10	周颖,顾万荣,张立国,等.不同熟期春玉米籽粒乳线比例与含水率、粒重及激素的关系[J].西南农业学报, 2018, 31(3): 437-443.
	ZHOU Y, GU W R, ZHANG L G, et al.. Relationship of grain milk line percentage of spring maize with its water content,grain weight and hormone in different maturities [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 31(3): 437-443.
11	程富丽,杜雄,刘梦星,等.玉米倒伏及其对产量的影响[J].玉米科学, 2011, 19(1): 105-108.
	CHENG F L, DU X, LIU M X, et al.. Summer maize and the effects on grain yield [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2011,19(1):105-108.
12	勾玲,黄建军,张宾,等.群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响[J].作物学报, 2007(10): 1688-1695.
	GOU L, HUANG J J, ZHANG B, et al.. Effects of population density on stalk lodging resistant mechanism and agronomic characteristics of maize [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2007(10): 1688-1695.
13	李伟,吴科斌,陈艳军,等.玉米秸秆抗根倒伏强度检测方法[J].农业机械学报, 2012, 43(2): 66-69.
	LI W, WU K B, CHEN Y J, et al.. Strength evaluation of root lodging resistance in maize stalk [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2012, 43(2): 66-69.
14	鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000:1-495.
15	李小方,张志良.植物生理学实验指导[M].第5版.北京:高等教育出版社, 2016:1-339.
16	马兴林,徐安波,杨久臣,等.关于玉米种植密度的思考与讨论[J].玉米科学, 2020, 28(2): 96-99.
	MA X L, XU A B, YANG J C, et al.. Consideration and discussion on maize planting density [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2020, 28(2): 96-99.
17	郑云霄,刘文斯,赵永锋,等.玉米种质资源的抗倒伏性评价及鉴定指标筛选[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(6): 1588-1596.
	ZHENG Y X, LIU W S, ZHAO Y F, et al.. Evaluation of lodging resistance and selection of identification indexes of maize germplasm resources [J]. J. Plant Genetic Resour., 2019, 20(6): 1588-1596.
18	贾桂平,边大红,蔡丽君,等.土壤耕作方式对夏玉米抗茎倒伏能力的影响[J].华北农学报, 2013(4): 163-168.
	JIA G P, BIAN D H, CAI L J, et al.. Soil tillage methods on stalk lodging resistance of summer maize [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2013(4):163-168.
19	ZHEN X, LAI T, SHUANG L, et al.. Promoting potassium allocation to stalk enhances stalk bending resistance of maize [J]. Field Crops Res., 2018, 215:200-206.
20	BIAN D H, JIA G P, CUI Y H, et al.. Effects of tillage practices on root characteristics and root lodging resistance of maize [J]. Field Crops Res., 2016, 185: 89-96.
21	周颖,顾万荣,赵猛,等.黑龙江省不同熟期春玉米品种茎秆特性及机收指标差异[J].华北农学报, 2017, 32(21): 140-146.
	ZHOU Y, GU W R, ZHAO M, et al.. Differences of stalk characteristics and grain mechanically harvesting qualities of different maturing-type spring maize in Heilongjiang province [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2017, 32(21): 140-146.

年份 Year	熟期 Maturing	品种 Variety	株高 Plant height/cm	穗位高 Ear height/cm	穗高系数 Ear height coefficient/%	基部第3节The 3^rd basal internode
年份 Year	熟期 Maturing	品种 Variety	株高 Plant height/cm	穗位高 Ear height/cm	穗高系数 Ear height coefficient/%	长 Length/cm	粗 Diameter/cm	长粗比Ratio of Length and diameter
2018	中晚熟 Mid-late maturing	ZD958	260.2 c	127.8 a	49.1 a	9.3 e	23.0 a	4.1 d
	中晚熟 Mid-late maturing	JH5	260.0 c	95.1 d	36.6 bcd	10.1 d	22.6 a	4.5 d
	中熟 Mid-maturing	DH605	291.5 b	114.7 bc	39.3 b	13.0 b	19.8 b	6.6 ab
		XY335	308.8 a	111.0 c	35.9 cd	12.0 c	22.3 a	5.4 c
		XY047	307.3 a	119.0 b	38.7 bc	13.9 a	22.3 a	6.2 b
	中早熟 Mid-early maturing	JNK728	285.3 b	98.1 d	34.4 d	12.7 b	18.2 b	7.0 a
	中早熟 Mid-early maturing	MC812	283.1 b	112.3 bc	39.7 b	12.7 b	18.5 b	6.9 ab
2019	中晚熟 Mid-late maturing	ZD958	262.7 c	122.3 a	46.5 a	9.8 d	21.9 a	4.5 e
	中晚熟 Mid-late maturing	JH5	236.6 e	85.7 e	36.2 de	10.1 bcd	20.3 b	5.0 d
	中熟 Mid-maturing	DH605	255.8 d	93.2 d	36.5 cd	9.9 cd	18.8 c	5.3 cd
		XY335	280.1 a	97.9 c	34.9 e	11.2 a	19.1 c	5.9 ab
		XY047	276.4 b	104.4 b	37.8 c	10.7 abc	18.6 c	5.7 abc
	中早熟 Mid-early maturing	JNK728	264.9 c	98.0 c	37.0 cd	10.8 ab	17.6 d	6.2 a
	中早熟 Mid-early maturing	MC812	254.9 d	102.4 b	40.2 b	9.6 d	17.4 d	5.6 bc

年份 Year	熟期 Maturing	品种 Variety	株高 Plant height/cm	穗位高 Ear height/cm	穗高系数 Ear height coefficient/%	基部第3节The 3^rd basal internode
年份 Year	熟期 Maturing	品种 Variety	株高 Plant height/cm	穗位高 Ear height/cm	穗高系数 Ear height coefficient/%	长 Length/cm	粗 Diameter/cm	长粗比Ratio of Length and diameter
2018	中晚熟 Mid-late maturing	ZD958	260.2 c	127.8 a	49.1 a	9.3 e	23.0 a	4.1 d
	中晚熟 Mid-late maturing	JH5	260.0 c	95.1 d	36.6 bcd	10.1 d	22.6 a	4.5 d
	中熟 Mid-maturing	DH605	291.5 b	114.7 bc	39.3 b	13.0 b	19.8 b	6.6 ab
		XY335	308.8 a	111.0 c	35.9 cd	12.0 c	22.3 a	5.4 c
		XY047	307.3 a	119.0 b	38.7 bc	13.9 a	22.3 a	6.2 b
	中早熟 Mid-early maturing	JNK728	285.3 b	98.1 d	34.4 d	12.7 b	18.2 b	7.0 a
	中早熟 Mid-early maturing	MC812	283.1 b	112.3 bc	39.7 b	12.7 b	18.5 b	6.9 ab
2019	中晚熟 Mid-late maturing	ZD958	262.7 c	122.3 a	46.5 a	9.8 d	21.9 a	4.5 e
	中晚熟 Mid-late maturing	JH5	236.6 e	85.7 e	36.2 de	10.1 bcd	20.3 b	5.0 d
	中熟 Mid-maturing	DH605	255.8 d	93.2 d	36.5 cd	9.9 cd	18.8 c	5.3 cd
		XY335	280.1 a	97.9 c	34.9 e	11.2 a	19.1 c	5.9 ab
		XY047	276.4 b	104.4 b	37.8 c	10.7 abc	18.6 c	5.7 abc
	中早熟 Mid-early maturing	JNK728	264.9 c	98.0 c	37.0 cd	10.8 ab	17.6 d	6.2 a
	中早熟 Mid-early maturing	MC812	254.9 d	102.4 b	40.2 b	9.6 d	17.4 d	5.6 bc

熟期 Maturing	品种 Variety	节1 1^st internode	节2 2^nd internode	地下节根数Underground-internodes	单株总根数 Total internodes number per plant	根拔力 Vertical root-pulling resistance/kN
中晚熟Mid-late maturing	ZD958	12.0 c	7.8 d	28.6 a	48.4 b	0.936 c
中晚熟Mid-late maturing	JH5	18.0 a	12.8 a	21.2 bc	52.0 a	1.292 a
中熟Mid-maturing	DH605	14.1 b	10.8 bc	22.1 b	47.0 b	1.205 ab
	XY335	14.4 b	11.5 b	23.5 b	49.4 ab	1.256 ab
	XY047	14.3 b	11.8 ab	21.3 bc	47.4 b	1.229 ab
中早熟Mid-early maturing	JNK728	13.9 b	9.8 c	16.2 d	39.9 c	1.171 ab
中早熟Mid-early maturing	MC812	12.2 c	8.4 d	18.9 c	39.5 c	1.137 b

熟期 Maturing	品种 Variety	节1 1^st internode	节2 2^nd internode	地下节根数Underground-internodes	单株总根数 Total internodes number per plant	根拔力 Vertical root-pulling resistance/kN
中晚熟Mid-late maturing	ZD958	12.0 c	7.8 d	28.6 a	48.4 b	0.936 c
中晚熟Mid-late maturing	JH5	18.0 a	12.8 a	21.2 bc	52.0 a	1.292 a
中熟Mid-maturing	DH605	14.1 b	10.8 bc	22.1 b	47.0 b	1.205 ab
	XY335	14.4 b	11.5 b	23.5 b	49.4 ab	1.256 ab
	XY047	14.3 b	11.8 ab	21.3 bc	47.4 b	1.229 ab
中早熟Mid-early maturing	JNK728	13.9 b	9.8 c	16.2 d	39.9 c	1.171 ab
中早熟Mid-early maturing	MC812	12.2 c	8.4 d	18.9 c	39.5 c	1.137 b

[1]	Panpan ZHANG, Chuan LI, Meiwei ZHANG, Xia ZHAO, Jun NIU, Jiangfang QIAO. Effect of Nitrification Inhibitor Application on Nitrogen Accumulation and Transportation and Grain Yield of Summer Maize Under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 181-189.
[2]	Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, Gulimila Aikebaier, Lin XU, Guorong YAN, Ning LIU, Lianjia ZHAO, Chaohong DENG, Palidan Aihaiti, Wei WANG. Review， Status and Suggestions of the Protection on New Agricultural Plant Varieties in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 1-11.
[3]	Xiaoling ZHAI, Ruixia WANG, Lian ZHANG, Juan JIAO, Yugang LI, Shengjian WANG, Xiaolei QI, Hongmei GE, Shengquan ZHANG. Genetic Relationship of Wheat Derivatives Variety （Line） from Yannong 74（11） Using High-density 90K SNP Array [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 35-43.
[4]	Yuan YI, Huiyun ZHANG, Liwei LIU, Jing WANG, Xuecheng ZHU, Na ZHAO, Guohua FENG. Effects of Slow-released Fertilizer Compound Humic Acid Instead of Urea on Grain Yield and Population Quality in Xumai New Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 144-153.
[5]	Yonghua SUN, Wei HU. Development of Biobreeding Techniques in Main Aquaculture Fish Species [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(12): 120-128.
[6]	YU Bingxing, WANG Hongfu, WANG Zhenhua, ZHANG Peng, CHENG Kai, YU Aili, YAN Haili, YU Bingjie. Effects of Paclobutrazol on Stalk Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Foxtail Millet [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 37-44.
[7]	WANG Wenyu, WAN Siyu, ZHANG Xuesong, WANG Xu, LI Jiashuo, ZHENG Guiping*. Effects of Silicon Fertilizer on Lodging Resistance of Kenjing 7 Under Different Tillage Modes [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 145-153.
[8]	LI Ting, HU Minjun, XU Jun, JIANG Yugen, YAN Huili, YU Yijun, HE Zhenyan . Researches in Screening and Breeding of Rice Varieties with Low-Cadmium Accumulation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 36-46.
[9]	LI Jinglin, LIU Shaodong, ZHANG Siping, CHEN Jing, LIU Ruihua, SHEN Qian, LI Yang, MA Huijuan, ZHAO Xinhua, PANG Chaoyou. Identification of Drought Tolerance During Whole Growth Period in Cotton Germplasm Resources and Resistance Index Screening [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 52-65.
[10]	WU Guangjun, HUANG Zhiyin, ZHANG Chao, LU Duxu, ZHAI Naijia, QIAO Jian, LIU Weixia, WANG Ningning, WANG Guangming. Study on Nitrogen Reduction and Efficiency Increase Technology Under Water-fertilizer Integration of Summer Maize in Central Region of Shandong Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 145-152.
[11]	ZHANG Yongfang, GAO Zhihui, SHI Pengqing, HAN Zhiping*. Adaptability Analysis of Different Soybean Varieties Based on Agronomic and Quality Traits [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 25-32.
[12]	LIU Xiaoying1§, LI Xiaohua2§, ZHENG Xingwei2, QIAO Ling2, ZHAO Jiajia2, GE Chuan3, QIAO Linyi2, ZHANG Shuwei2, ZHENG Jun2. Evolution and Relevant Analysis of Agronomic Characters of Wheat in Shanxi Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(3): 14-23.
[13]	ZHANG Panpan, LIU Jingbao*, HUANG Lu, QIAO Jiangfang, LI Chuan, ZHANG Meiwei. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Applications on Yield and Biomass Distribution of Mechanized Harvesting Maize Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(3): 108-118.
[14]	JIANG Mingjin1, LI Min1*, ZHOU Weijia1, LUO Deqiang1, JIANG Xuehai1, JI Guangmei1, LI Lijiang1, XU Wenbo1, QIN Yuhe2. Screening and Evaluation of High-quality Indica Rice Cultivars Suitable for Mechanized Transplanting [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(10): 27-37.
[15]	WANG Haibiao, ZHANG Bo, CHANG Feng, TAO Jingjing, LIU Pei, WANG Yilun*. Effects of Combined Application of Coated Urea and Common Urea on Summer Maize Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 98-105.