Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 181-189.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0990
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Panpan ZHANG(), Chuan LI, Meiwei ZHANG, Xia ZHAO, Jun NIU, Jiangfang QIAO(
)
Received:
2021-11-20
Accepted:
2022-04-12
Online:
2023-06-01
Published:
2023-07-28
Contact:
Jiangfang QIAO
通讯作者:
乔江方
作者简介:
张盼盼 E-mail:zhangpan1602@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Panpan ZHANG, Chuan LI, Meiwei ZHANG, Xia ZHAO, Jun NIU, Jiangfang QIAO. Effect of Nitrification Inhibitor Application on Nitrogen Accumulation and Transportation and Grain Yield of Summer Maize Under Reduced Nitrogen[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 181-189.
张盼盼, 李川, 张美微, 赵霞, 牛军, 乔江方. 氮肥减施下添加硝化抑制剂对夏玉米氮素累积转运和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 181-189.
年份Year | 处理Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 鞘 Sheath | 穗轴Cobs | 苞叶Bract | 籽粒 Grain | 植株Plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | T1 | 5.66±0.06 bc | 3.73±0.00 a | 1.58±0.05 ab | 1.91±0.02 a | 1.10±0.01 a | 10.61±0.32 ab | 24.59±0.16 ab |
T2 | 7.82±0.23 a | 3.42±0.00 ab | 1.64±0.07 a | 1.46±0.04 bc | 1.14±0.01 a | 11.12±0.44 ab | 26.59±0.21 a | |
T3 | 4.81±0.19 cd | 2.84±0.03 bcd | 1.31±0.01 bc | 1.64±0.07 abc | 0.87±0.03 abc | 10.41±0.10 bc | 21.89±0.04 bc | |
T4 | 5.99±0.06 b | 3.26±0.10 bc | 1.62±0.05 a | 1.88±0.02 a | 0.93±0.03 ab | 11.59±0.35 a | 25.26±0.76 a | |
T5 | 3.74±0.11 cd | 3.61±0.14 ab | 1.39±0.01 bc | 1.62±0.05 abc | 0.80±0.03 bc | 9.55±0.38 c | 20.71±0.06 bc | |
T6 | 5.27±0.21 bc | 3.31±0.03 ab | 1.52±0.02 ab | 1.78±0.07 ab | 0.98±0.01 ab | 9.33±0.28 cd | 22.18±0.23 bc | |
T7 | 3.62±0.04 cd | 2.80±0.08 cd | 1.25±0.04 c | 1.26±0.01 c | 0.71±0.02 bc | 9.33±0.37 cd | 18.96±0.19 c | |
平均Mean | 5.27 | 3.28 | 1.47 | 1.65 | 0.93 | 10.28 | 22.88 | |
2020 | T1 | 5.10±0.15 ab | 3.35±0.00 a | 1.42±0.04 a | 1.72±0.02 a | 0.99±0.03 a | 11.95±0.48 a | 24.53±0.21 a |
T2 | 4.53±0.18 b | 2.88±0.00 abc | 1.18±0.05 bc | 1.31±0.04 ab | 0.73±0.01 abc | 11.43±0.11 ab | 22.05±0.04 ab | |
T3 | 4.33±0.04 bc | 2.76±0.08 abc | 1.38±0.01 ab | 1.48±0.06 ab | 0.98±0.01 a | 11.17±0.34 ab | 22.10±0.21 ab | |
T4 | 5.39±0.16 a | 2.94±0.12 abc | 1.46±0.00 a | 1.69±0.02 a | 0.84±0.03 ab | 12.49±0.37 a | 24.80±0.04 a | |
T5 | 4.47±0.18 bc | 3.25±0.03 ab | 1.25±0.00 abc | 1.46±0.00 ab | 0.72±0.03 abc | 10.97±0.11 ab | 22.11±0.15 ab | |
T6 | 3.96±0.04 bcd | 3.12±0.09 ab | 1.26±0.04 abc | 1.44±0.00 ab | 0.76±0.01 abc | 11.16±0.33 b | 21.69±0.18 bc | |
T7 | 3.26±0.10 cd | 2.52±0.10 bc | 1.12±0.04 bc | 1.13±0.03 b | 0.63±0.02 bc | 11.02±0.44 b | 19.69±0.04 c | |
平均 Mean | 4.43 | 2.97 | 1.30 | 1.46 | 0.81 | 11.46 | 22.43 |
Table 1 Dry matter accumulation of maize organs in the maturity stage under different treatments
年份Year | 处理Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 鞘 Sheath | 穗轴Cobs | 苞叶Bract | 籽粒 Grain | 植株Plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | T1 | 5.66±0.06 bc | 3.73±0.00 a | 1.58±0.05 ab | 1.91±0.02 a | 1.10±0.01 a | 10.61±0.32 ab | 24.59±0.16 ab |
T2 | 7.82±0.23 a | 3.42±0.00 ab | 1.64±0.07 a | 1.46±0.04 bc | 1.14±0.01 a | 11.12±0.44 ab | 26.59±0.21 a | |
T3 | 4.81±0.19 cd | 2.84±0.03 bcd | 1.31±0.01 bc | 1.64±0.07 abc | 0.87±0.03 abc | 10.41±0.10 bc | 21.89±0.04 bc | |
T4 | 5.99±0.06 b | 3.26±0.10 bc | 1.62±0.05 a | 1.88±0.02 a | 0.93±0.03 ab | 11.59±0.35 a | 25.26±0.76 a | |
T5 | 3.74±0.11 cd | 3.61±0.14 ab | 1.39±0.01 bc | 1.62±0.05 abc | 0.80±0.03 bc | 9.55±0.38 c | 20.71±0.06 bc | |
T6 | 5.27±0.21 bc | 3.31±0.03 ab | 1.52±0.02 ab | 1.78±0.07 ab | 0.98±0.01 ab | 9.33±0.28 cd | 22.18±0.23 bc | |
T7 | 3.62±0.04 cd | 2.80±0.08 cd | 1.25±0.04 c | 1.26±0.01 c | 0.71±0.02 bc | 9.33±0.37 cd | 18.96±0.19 c | |
平均Mean | 5.27 | 3.28 | 1.47 | 1.65 | 0.93 | 10.28 | 22.88 | |
2020 | T1 | 5.10±0.15 ab | 3.35±0.00 a | 1.42±0.04 a | 1.72±0.02 a | 0.99±0.03 a | 11.95±0.48 a | 24.53±0.21 a |
T2 | 4.53±0.18 b | 2.88±0.00 abc | 1.18±0.05 bc | 1.31±0.04 ab | 0.73±0.01 abc | 11.43±0.11 ab | 22.05±0.04 ab | |
T3 | 4.33±0.04 bc | 2.76±0.08 abc | 1.38±0.01 ab | 1.48±0.06 ab | 0.98±0.01 a | 11.17±0.34 ab | 22.10±0.21 ab | |
T4 | 5.39±0.16 a | 2.94±0.12 abc | 1.46±0.00 a | 1.69±0.02 a | 0.84±0.03 ab | 12.49±0.37 a | 24.80±0.04 a | |
T5 | 4.47±0.18 bc | 3.25±0.03 ab | 1.25±0.00 abc | 1.46±0.00 ab | 0.72±0.03 abc | 10.97±0.11 ab | 22.11±0.15 ab | |
T6 | 3.96±0.04 bcd | 3.12±0.09 ab | 1.26±0.04 abc | 1.44±0.00 ab | 0.76±0.01 abc | 11.16±0.33 b | 21.69±0.18 bc | |
T7 | 3.26±0.10 cd | 2.52±0.10 bc | 1.12±0.04 bc | 1.13±0.03 b | 0.63±0.02 bc | 11.02±0.44 b | 19.69±0.04 c | |
平均 Mean | 4.43 | 2.97 | 1.30 | 1.46 | 0.81 | 11.46 | 22.43 |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 鞘 Sheath | 穗轴 Cobs | 苞叶 Bract | 籽粒 Grain | 植株 Plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | T1 | 29.49±0.29 bcd | 37.40±1.12 bc | 4.59±0.18 cd | 3.65±0.04 bc | 4.86±0.05 b | 124.22±1.24 ab | 204.21±2.04 ab |
T2 | 32.12±0.96 bc | 42.66±1.28 a | 5.89±0.06 b | 4.41±0.76 a | 6.03±0.18 a | 124.87±3.75 a | 215.98±2.16 a | |
T3 | 33.39±1.34 bc | 42.58±1.70 a | 5.42±0.16 bc | 3.94±0.04 ab | 3.45±0.14 bc | 125.12±5.00 a | 213.89±6.42 a | |
T4 | 44.24±0.44 a | 36.44±0.36 bc | 6.55±0.26 a | 4.08±0.12 a | 4.37±0.13 b | 123.22±1.23 ab | 218.90±8.76 a | |
T5 | 34.04±1.02 bc | 27.44±0.82 d | 4.89±0.15 cd | 3.10±0.12 c | 4.58±0.14 b | 125.28±1.25 a | 199.33±5.98 ab | |
T6 | 37.53±1.50 b | 32.55±1.30 cd | 6.93±0.28 a | 4.00±0.16 ab | 6.51±0.26 a | 109.50±3.29 c | 197.01±5.91 abc | |
T7 | 25.88±0.26 cd | 33.32±1.00 bcd | 3.88±0.04 d | 3.20±0.03 c | 3.77±0.15 bc | 120.82±4.83 bc | 190.88±7.64 bc | |
平均Mean | 35.24 | 36.06 | 5.45 | 3.77 | 4.80 | 122.25 | 205.74 | |
2020 | T1 | 41.55±0.42 b | 45.13±0.45 a | 9.07±0.36 ab | 5.73±0.17 a | 4.52±0.14 ab | 125.57±1.22 ab | 231.57±9.26 ab |
T2 | 53.92±1.62 a | 48.16±1.44 a | 10.33±0.10 a | 3.22±0.13 cd | 5.11±0.20 a | 120.18±3.61 bc | 240.92±2.41 a | |
T3 | 33.64±1.35 bc | 42.68±1.71 ab | 7.69±0.23 cd | 3.96±0.04 bc | 3.06±0.03 bcd | 129.92±5.20 a | 220.95±2.21 abc | |
T4 | 34.88±0.35 bc | 41.56±0.42 ab | 7.87±0.24 cd | 4.75±0.76 ab | 4.53±0.05 ab | 135.47±1.35 a | 229.06±2.29 ab | |
T5 | 30.10±0.30 cd | 42.15±1.26 ab | 7.77±0.08 cd | 3.00±0.03 cd | 2.42±0.07 cd | 125.10±1.25 ab | 210.55±6.32 bc | |
T6 | 25.91±0.26 d | 35.38±1.42 bc | 8.67±0.26 bc | 3.89±0.12 bc | 4.14±0.17 bc | 130.79±3.92 a | 208.78±8.35 bcd | |
T7 | 28.09±0.84 d | 32.19±0.32 c | 7.74±0.31 cd | 4.22±0.17 ab | 2.82±0.03 cd | 114.50±1.15 c | 189.56±1.90 cd | |
平均Mean | 35.44 | 41.04 | 8.45 | 4.11 | 3.80 | 125.93 | 218.77 |
Table 2 Nitrogen accumulation of maize organs in the maturity stage under different treatments
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 鞘 Sheath | 穗轴 Cobs | 苞叶 Bract | 籽粒 Grain | 植株 Plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | T1 | 29.49±0.29 bcd | 37.40±1.12 bc | 4.59±0.18 cd | 3.65±0.04 bc | 4.86±0.05 b | 124.22±1.24 ab | 204.21±2.04 ab |
T2 | 32.12±0.96 bc | 42.66±1.28 a | 5.89±0.06 b | 4.41±0.76 a | 6.03±0.18 a | 124.87±3.75 a | 215.98±2.16 a | |
T3 | 33.39±1.34 bc | 42.58±1.70 a | 5.42±0.16 bc | 3.94±0.04 ab | 3.45±0.14 bc | 125.12±5.00 a | 213.89±6.42 a | |
T4 | 44.24±0.44 a | 36.44±0.36 bc | 6.55±0.26 a | 4.08±0.12 a | 4.37±0.13 b | 123.22±1.23 ab | 218.90±8.76 a | |
T5 | 34.04±1.02 bc | 27.44±0.82 d | 4.89±0.15 cd | 3.10±0.12 c | 4.58±0.14 b | 125.28±1.25 a | 199.33±5.98 ab | |
T6 | 37.53±1.50 b | 32.55±1.30 cd | 6.93±0.28 a | 4.00±0.16 ab | 6.51±0.26 a | 109.50±3.29 c | 197.01±5.91 abc | |
T7 | 25.88±0.26 cd | 33.32±1.00 bcd | 3.88±0.04 d | 3.20±0.03 c | 3.77±0.15 bc | 120.82±4.83 bc | 190.88±7.64 bc | |
平均Mean | 35.24 | 36.06 | 5.45 | 3.77 | 4.80 | 122.25 | 205.74 | |
2020 | T1 | 41.55±0.42 b | 45.13±0.45 a | 9.07±0.36 ab | 5.73±0.17 a | 4.52±0.14 ab | 125.57±1.22 ab | 231.57±9.26 ab |
T2 | 53.92±1.62 a | 48.16±1.44 a | 10.33±0.10 a | 3.22±0.13 cd | 5.11±0.20 a | 120.18±3.61 bc | 240.92±2.41 a | |
T3 | 33.64±1.35 bc | 42.68±1.71 ab | 7.69±0.23 cd | 3.96±0.04 bc | 3.06±0.03 bcd | 129.92±5.20 a | 220.95±2.21 abc | |
T4 | 34.88±0.35 bc | 41.56±0.42 ab | 7.87±0.24 cd | 4.75±0.76 ab | 4.53±0.05 ab | 135.47±1.35 a | 229.06±2.29 ab | |
T5 | 30.10±0.30 cd | 42.15±1.26 ab | 7.77±0.08 cd | 3.00±0.03 cd | 2.42±0.07 cd | 125.10±1.25 ab | 210.55±6.32 bc | |
T6 | 25.91±0.26 d | 35.38±1.42 bc | 8.67±0.26 bc | 3.89±0.12 bc | 4.14±0.17 bc | 130.79±3.92 a | 208.78±8.35 bcd | |
T7 | 28.09±0.84 d | 32.19±0.32 c | 7.74±0.31 cd | 4.22±0.17 ab | 2.82±0.03 cd | 114.50±1.15 c | 189.56±1.90 cd | |
平均Mean | 35.44 | 41.04 | 8.45 | 4.11 | 3.80 | 125.93 | 218.77 |
处理 Treatment | 吐丝期营养器官氮素累积量 N accumulation in vegetative organ in silking stage/(kg·hm-2) | 花后氮素转运量 N transportation amount after silking/ (kg·hm-2) | 花后氮素转运率 N transportation rate after silking/% | 花后氮素转运对籽粒氮素贡献率 Concentration rate to grain of N transportation after silking/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | T1 | 123.84±1.24 bc | 43.85±1.75 a | 35.41±1.13 a | 35.30±0.35 a |
T2 | 130.54±3.92 ab | 39.43±0.39 bc | 30.20±0.91 bc | 31.58±0.95 abc | |
T3 | 126.43±3.79 abc | 37.66±1.13 bcd | 29.79±1.19 bc | 30.10±0.30 bc | |
T4 | 136.49±1.36 a | 40.81±1.63 ab | 29.90±0.30 bc | 33.12±0.99 ab | |
T5 | 115.44±3.46 cd | 41.39±0.41 a | 35.86±1.43 a | 33.04±1.32 ab | |
T6 | 112.29±4.49 cd | 24.78±0.25 d | 22.07±0.22 cd | 22.63±0.23 cd | |
T7 | 105.22±1.05 cd | 35.16±0.35 cd | 33.42±1.00 ab | 29.10±0.87 bc | |
平均Mean | 121.46 | 37.58 | 30.95 | 30.70 | |
2020 | T1 | 146.03±1.46 ab | 40.03±1.60 bc | 27.41±0.27 bc | 31.88±1.28 abc |
T2 | 153.85±1.54 a | 33.12±1.32 cd | 21.53±0.86 bc | 27.56±0.28 bcd | |
T3 | 134.86±4.05 bc | 43.83±0.44 ab | 32.50±0.33 ab | 33.73±0.34 ab | |
T4 | 140.73±5.63 abc | 47.14±1.41 a | 33.50±1.34 a | 34.80±0.35 a | |
T5 | 121.90±3.66 bcd | 36.45±1.46 cd | 29.90±0.90 abc | 29.14±1.17 bc | |
T6 | 117.57±1.18 cd | 39.57±0.40 bc | 33.66±1.35 a | 30.25±0.91 bc | |
T7 | 108.80±3.26 cd | 33.74±0.34 cd | 31.01±0.31 ab | 29.47±0.29 bc | |
平均Mean | 131.96 | 39.12 | 29.93 | 30.97 |
Table 3 Characteristics of nitrogen transportation in organ vegetation of maize plant under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 吐丝期营养器官氮素累积量 N accumulation in vegetative organ in silking stage/(kg·hm-2) | 花后氮素转运量 N transportation amount after silking/ (kg·hm-2) | 花后氮素转运率 N transportation rate after silking/% | 花后氮素转运对籽粒氮素贡献率 Concentration rate to grain of N transportation after silking/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | T1 | 123.84±1.24 bc | 43.85±1.75 a | 35.41±1.13 a | 35.30±0.35 a |
T2 | 130.54±3.92 ab | 39.43±0.39 bc | 30.20±0.91 bc | 31.58±0.95 abc | |
T3 | 126.43±3.79 abc | 37.66±1.13 bcd | 29.79±1.19 bc | 30.10±0.30 bc | |
T4 | 136.49±1.36 a | 40.81±1.63 ab | 29.90±0.30 bc | 33.12±0.99 ab | |
T5 | 115.44±3.46 cd | 41.39±0.41 a | 35.86±1.43 a | 33.04±1.32 ab | |
T6 | 112.29±4.49 cd | 24.78±0.25 d | 22.07±0.22 cd | 22.63±0.23 cd | |
T7 | 105.22±1.05 cd | 35.16±0.35 cd | 33.42±1.00 ab | 29.10±0.87 bc | |
平均Mean | 121.46 | 37.58 | 30.95 | 30.70 | |
2020 | T1 | 146.03±1.46 ab | 40.03±1.60 bc | 27.41±0.27 bc | 31.88±1.28 abc |
T2 | 153.85±1.54 a | 33.12±1.32 cd | 21.53±0.86 bc | 27.56±0.28 bcd | |
T3 | 134.86±4.05 bc | 43.83±0.44 ab | 32.50±0.33 ab | 33.73±0.34 ab | |
T4 | 140.73±5.63 abc | 47.14±1.41 a | 33.50±1.34 a | 34.80±0.35 a | |
T5 | 121.90±3.66 bcd | 36.45±1.46 cd | 29.90±0.90 abc | 29.14±1.17 bc | |
T6 | 117.57±1.18 cd | 39.57±0.40 bc | 33.66±1.35 a | 30.25±0.91 bc | |
T7 | 108.80±3.26 cd | 33.74±0.34 cd | 31.01±0.31 ab | 29.47±0.29 bc | |
平均Mean | 131.96 | 39.12 | 29.93 | 30.97 |
Fig. 1 Grain yield of maize under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments in same year at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 2 Partial factor productivity of N fertilizer under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments in same year at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Amount of pure N absorbed per 100 kg grain under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments in same year at P<0.05 level.
1 | 国家统计局.中国统计年鉴-2020 [EB/OL]. [2021-10-15].. |
2 | 陈传永,赵久然,王元东,等.氮肥减施对京科968与郑单958氮效率及产量的影响[J].玉米科学,2018,26(3):121-127. |
CHEN C Y, ZHAO J R, WANG Y D, et al.. Effects of nitrogen reduction on nitrogen efficiency and yield of Jingke968 and Zhendan 958 [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2018, 26(3): 121-127. | |
3 | 彭钰洁,程楠,李佳佳,等. 氮肥减施对玉米幼苗根系分泌物影响的根际代谢组学分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(6): 807-814. |
PENG Y J, CHENG N, LI J J, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on root exudates of maize seedling analyzed by rhizosphere metabonomics [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2018, 26(6): 807-814. | |
4 | 尹彩侠,李前,孔丽丽,等. 控释氮肥减施对春玉米产量、氮素吸收及转运的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(20): 3941-3950. |
YIN C X, LI Q, KONG L L, et al.. Effect of reduced controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer application on yield, nitrogen absorption and transportation of spring maize [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2018, 51(20): 3941-3950. | |
5 | 陈治嘉,隋标,赵兴敏,等. 吉林省黑土区玉米氮肥减施效果研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2018, 26(6): 139-145. |
CHEN Z J, SUI B, ZHAO X M, et al.. Effect of nitrogen reduction on maize in black soil area of Jilin province [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2018, 26(6): 139-145. | |
6 | 孙晓,景建元,吕慎强,等. 不同缓/控释尿素在黄土台塬区春玉米的减量施用效果[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(6): 848-855. |
SUN X, JING J Y, LYU S Q, et al.. Effect of different rates of slow/controlled release urea on nitrogen content in spring maize in loess highlands [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2017, 25(6): 848-855. | |
7 | 张盼盼,朱玉平,黄璐,等. 氮肥减施对夏玉米花后生理特性的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(4): 137-145, 164. |
ZHANG P P, ZHU Y P, HUANG L, et al.. Effects of reducing nitrogen applications on the physiological characteristics after anthesis of summer maize [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2020, 28(4): 137-145, 164. | |
8 | CÉLINE M, ISABELLE Q, ANDRÉ G, et al.. The challenge of remobilisation in plant nitrogen economy. A survey of physio‐agronomic and molecular approaches [J]. Ann. Appl.Biol., 2010, 138(1):69-81. |
9 | LIU S L, WANG X H, YIN X H, et al.. Ammonia volatilization loss and corn nitrogen nutrition and productivity with efficiency enhanced uan and urea under no-tillage [J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2019, 9(1):6610 [2021-10-15]. . |
10 | 王进军,黄瑞冬. 玉米氮效率及其研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2005, 13(1): 89-92. |
WANG J J, HUANG R D. Nitrogen use efficiency and its research advances in maize [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2005, 13(1): 89-92. | |
11 | OSLAN J, YUSMINAH H, R.NENI I, et al.. Combined effects of nitrification inhibitor and zeolite on greenhouse gas fluxes and corn growth [J]. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2020, 27(2): 2087-2095. |
12 | ZHANG L, WU Z, JIANG Y, et al.. Fate of applied urea 15N in a soil-maize system as affected by urease inhibitor and nitrification inhibitor [J]. Plant Soil Environ., 2010, 56(1):8-15. |
13 | 崔磊,李东坡,武志杰,等. 用于黑土的稳定性氯化铵的适宜硝化抑制剂和氮肥增效剂组合[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(12): 2178-2188. |
CUI L, LI D P, WU Z J, et al.. Suitable combination of nitrogen-inhibitors and nitrogen synergist for production of stable ammonium chloride applied to black soil [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2019, 25(12): 2178-2188. | |
14 | 张英鹏,李洪杰,刘兆辉,等. 农田减氮调控施肥对华北潮土区小麦-玉米轮作体系氮素损失的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1179-1187. |
ZHANG Y P, LI H J, LIU Z H, et al.. Effect of reducing N and regulated fertilization on N loss from wheat-maize rotation system of farmland in Chao soil region of North China Plain [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2019, 30(4): 1179-1187. | |
15 | 李婷玉. 增效氮肥综合效应及影响因素研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2018. |
LI T Y. Evaluation of integrated effectiveness of enhanced efficiency fertilizers and influencing factors [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018. | |
16 | 朱永昶,李玉娥,秦晓波,等. 控释肥和硝化抑制剂对华北春玉米N2O排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(7): 1421-1428. |
ZHU Y C, LI Y E, QIN X B, et al.. Effects of controlled release fertilizer and nitrification inhibitor additions on nitrous oxide emissions from spring maize field in Northern China [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2016, 35(7): 1421-1428. | |
17 | 蒲玮,吴雅薇,张頔,等. 减氮配施氮肥增效剂对土壤速效氮和玉米产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(3): 276-283. |
PU W, WU Y W, ZHANG D, et al.. Effects of nitrogen reduction combined with nitrogen fertilizer synergist on soil availability nitrogen and corn yield [J]. Bull. Soil Water Conserv., 2021, 35(3): 276-283. | |
18 | 郭静. 不同脲酶抑制剂/硝化抑制剂组合增效机理研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2020. |
GUO J. Study on synergistic mechanism of different urease inhibiter and nitrification inhibiter combinations [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2020. | |
19 | 崔磊,李东坡,武志杰,等.高效稳定性硫酸铵氮肥在黑土中的施用效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2390-2398. |
CUI L, LI D P, WU Z J, et al.. Effects of high efficiency and stability ammonium sulfate fertilizer applied in black soil [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2020, 31(7): 2390-2398. | |
20 | 王丹阳,边文范,董晓霞,等. 氮肥增效剂用量对玉米产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(12): 53-57. |
WANG D Y, BIAN W F, DONG X X, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer synergist amounts on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2019, 51(12): 53-57. | |
21 | 李广浩,刘娟,董树亭,等. 密植与氮肥用量对不同耐密型夏玉米品种产量及氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12): 2247-2258. |
LI G H, LIU J, DONG S T, et al.. Effects of close planting and nitrogen application rates on grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of different density-tolerance maize hybrids [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(12): 2247-2258. | |
22 | 任佰朝,范霞,董树亭,等. 种植密度和施氮量对不同株高夏玉米产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 269-277. |
REN B C, FAN X, DONG S T, et al.. Effect of plant density and nitrogen rate on yield, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of summer maize hybrids with different plant height [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2017, 23(2): 269-277. | |
23 | 程乙,王洪章,刘鹏,等. 品种和氮素供应对玉米根系特征及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12): 2259-2269. |
CHENG Y, WANG H Z, LIU P, et al.. Effect of different maize varieties and nitrogen supply on root characteristics and nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(12): 2259-2269. | |
24 | 陈晓辉,徐开未,唐义琴,等. 麦/玉/豆周年套作体系氮素积累分配及转运[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(5): 1127-1138. |
CHEN X H, XU K W, TANG Y Q, et al.. Nitrogen accumulation,allocation and translocation in wheat/maize/soybean relay intercropping system [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2014, 20(5): 1127-1138. | |
25 | 隋鹏祥,有德宝,安俊朋,等. 秸秆还田方式与施氮量对春玉米产量及干物质和氮素积累、转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(2): 316-324. |
SUI P X, YOU D B, AN J P, et al.. Effects of straw management and nitrogen application on spring maize yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and transfer [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2018, 24(2): 316-324. | |
26 | 张经廷,刘云鹏,李旭辉,等. 夏玉米各器官氮素积累与分配动态及其对氮肥的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(3): 506-514. |
ZHANG J T, LIU Y P, LI X H, et al.. Dynamic responses of nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in summer maize organs to nitrogen fertilizer [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2013, 39(3): 506-514. | |
27 | 孙旭东,孙浒,董树亭,等. 包膜尿素施用时期对夏玉米产量和氮素积累特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 2179-2188. |
SUN X D, SUN H, DONG S T, et al.. Effect of coated-urea application times on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(11): 2179-2188. | |
28 | 周培禄,任红,齐华,等. 氮肥用量对两种不同类型玉米杂交种物质生产及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(2): 263-276. |
ZHOU P L, REN H, QI H, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rates on dry matter productivity and nitrogen utilization of different type maize hybrids [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2017, 43(2): 263-276. | |
29 | 葛均筑,展茗,赵明,等. 一次性施肥对长江中游春玉米产量及养分利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(5): 1073-1082. |
GE J Z, ZHAN M, ZHAO M, et al.. Effects of single basal fertilization on yield and nutrient use efficiencies of spring maize in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze river [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2013, 19(5): 1073-1082. | |
30 | 董强,吴得峰,党廷辉,等. 黄土高原南部不同减氮模式对春玉米产量及土壤硝态氮残留的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4): 856-863. |
DONG Q, WU D F, DANG T H, et al.. Effects of different nitrogen reduction modes on yield of spring maize and nitrate-N residue in soils of the southern Loess Plateau [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2017, 23(4): 856-863. | |
31 | 郝小雨,马星竹,高中超,等. 氮肥管理措施对黑土春玉米产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(4): 151-159. |
HAO X Y, MA X Z, GAO Z C, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on spring maize yield and nitrogen utilization in black soil [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2016, 24(4): 151-159. | |
32 | 吴雪娜,彭智平,涂玉婷,等. 2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶对甜玉米产量和农艺性状的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2016, 43(11): 86-91. |
WU X N, PENG Z P, TU Y T, et al.. Effects of 2-chloro-6-trichloromethyl pyridine on yield and agronomic characters of sweet corn [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2016, 43(11): 86-91. | |
33 | 林海涛,李慧,余晔,等. 氮肥与新型增效剂配施对夏玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(11): 68-71. |
LIN H T, LI H, YU Y, et al.. Effects of N fertilizer combined with new synergist on summer corn growth and yield [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2015, 47(11): 68-71. | |
34 | 吴得峰. 黄土旱塬区减氮条件下氮素利用及温室气体排放特征[D]. 咸阳:西北农林科技大学, 2016. |
WU D F. Nitrogen utilization and greenhouse gas emissions under reduced nitrogen fertilization in the semiarid Loess Plateau [D]. Xianyang: Northwest A&F University, 2016. |
[1] | Zenghui MA, Qilong WANG. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties, Rice Yield and Economic Benefits in Low-lying Saline Alkali Land in Northern Shaanxi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 174-180. |
[2] | Lu TIAN, Xiaoxia GUO, Wenbin SU, Chunyan HUANG, Zhi LI, Peng ZHANG, Caiyuan JIAN, Jia LIU, Dejuan KONG, Kang HAN. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Continuous Cropping Sugar Beet [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 192-203. |
[3] | Chen CHEN, Ke SHI, Changwei ZHU, Guiying JIANG, Lan LUO, Weiwei MENG, Fang LIU, Fengmin SHEN, Shiliang LIU. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Wheat Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield, and Soil Nitrogen Content in Fluvo-aquic Soil in Northern Henan Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 24-33. |
[4] | Yanjun KE, Yumeng ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Zitao ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Combined with Subsoiling on Farmland Soil Fertility and Crop Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 157-166. |
[5] | Zhengran SUN, Cuiping ZHANG, Jinli ZHANG, Hao WU, Xiuyan LIU, Zhenkai WANG, Yuzhen YANG, Daohua HE. Effects of Chemical Detopping on Cotton Plant Growth in Guanzhong Cotton Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 167-177. |
[6] | Wenjun ZHAO, Jizhou YANG, Mei YIN, Jianfeng CHEN, Kaizheng XUE, Baowen HU, Libo FU, Wei WANG, Zhiyuan WANG, Yanxian YANG, Hua CHEN. Effects of Combined Application of Green Manure with Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 189-196. |
[7] | Xiangdong WANG, Yue SONG, Yanzhi MA. Quality Comparison and Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Zingiber officinale Rosc. Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 56-66. |
[8] | Ling YANG, Fucang ZHANG, Xin SUN, Shaohui ZHANG, Haidong WANG, Ahmed Elsayed ABDELGHANY, Zhanfei CHEN, Yuchuan FANG. Effects of Biochar and Drip Irrigation Amounts on Soil Properties and Growth of Potato in Blown-sand Region of Northern Yulin, Shaanxi Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 221-233. |
[9] | Jun CHEN, Jingwen LI, Liguang WANG, Tiandi ZHU, Chen CHEN, Qijun BAO, Qiaoming OU. Nitrogen Transfer Characteristics of Low Prolamin Transgenic Barley [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 47-56. |
[10] | Yunzhu ZHENG, Shuchen SUN. Effects of Straw Biochar and Straw on Soil Nutrients and Crop Yield in Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 152-162. |
[11] | Qiaoyi HUANG, Yongpei WU, Xu HUANG, Ping LI, Hongting FU, Mu ZHANG, Yuwan PANG, Zhaobing ZENG, Shuanhu TANG. Impact of Controlled-release Urea Combined with Conventional Urea on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Spring Sweet Corn Under One-off Application [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 163-173. |
[12] | Weixin DONG, Dongxiao LI, Yuechen ZHANG. Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Physiological Parameters, Yield and Quality of Maize [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 142-152. |
[13] | Kaihong XIANG, Xu LYU, Chuanhai SHU, Riqu WUZA, Jinyue ZHANG, Yuemei ZHU, Zhiyuan YANG, Yongjian SUN, Jun MA. Effects of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Precision Hill-direct-seeding Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 149-165. |
[14] | Hongtao XIANG, Wan LI, Ning HE, Qiang WANG, Lingling ZENG, Manli WANG, Chunjie YANG, Yanjiang FENG. Physiological Response and Effect of S3307 on Water Stress of Adzuki Bean Root [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 39-49. |
[15] | Yuanwei CHEN, Huabin ZHENG, Weiqin WANG, Na KUANG, Youyi LUO, Dan ZOU, Qiyuan TANG. Effect of Mowing Treatment on the Main Season Whole Plant Biomass and Silage Quality and Yield in Regeneration Season of Ratooning Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 161-171. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||