Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 47-56.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0693
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jun CHEN1(), Jingwen LI1(
), Liguang WANG1, Tiandi ZHU1, Chen CHEN1, Qijun BAO2, Qiaoming OU1
Received:
2021-08-13
Accepted:
2021-11-19
Online:
2023-03-15
Published:
2023-05-22
Contact:
Jingwen LI
陈军1(), 李静雯1(
), 王立光1, 朱天地1, 陈琛1, 包奇军2, 欧巧明1
通讯作者:
李静雯
作者简介:
陈军 E-mail:chenjun004@126.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Jun CHEN, Jingwen LI, Liguang WANG, Tiandi ZHU, Chen CHEN, Qijun BAO, Qiaoming OU. Nitrogen Transfer Characteristics of Low Prolamin Transgenic Barley[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 47-56.
陈军, 李静雯, 王立光, 朱天地, 陈琛, 包奇军, 欧巧明. 低醇溶蛋白转基因大麦氮素转移特征[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(3): 47-56.
材料 Material | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 有效穗数 Effective ear number | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per spike | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 单株籽粒产量 Grain yield per plant/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GP | N0 | 51.76±1.64 ab | 2.90±0.22 f | 14.07±0.61 c | 39.85±1.86 ab | 1.51±0.08 c |
N160 | 52.06±2.85 ab | 3.46±0.33 def | 18.64±1.15 ab | 44.63±1.96 a | 2.35±0.19 bc | |
N230 | 50.81±0.09 ab | 3.29±0.19 ef | 16.22±0.01 bc | 42.96±0.57 a | 3.09±0.08 ab | |
N300 | 54.62±3.36 a | 4.57±0.19 bcd | 17.96±2.15 abc | 43.99±1.22 a | 3.37±0.01 a | |
T | N0 | 45.69±1.71 b | 4.29±0.04 cde | 17.50±1.83 abc | 37.96±1.27 ab | 2.11±0.33 c |
N160 | 46.90±0.20 b | 5.85±0.89 a | 20.58±0.05 a | 31.55±1.37 b | 3.92±0.31 a | |
N230 | 45.93±0.13 b | 5.09±0.11 abc | 19.09±1.39 ab | 31.81±1.76 b | 3.32±0.22 a | |
N300 | 47.45±0.88 b | 5.54±0.04 ab | 21.19±0.65 a | 32.93±0.50 b | 3.79±0.03 a |
Table 1 Yield composition and grain yield of barley in different treatments
材料 Material | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 有效穗数 Effective ear number | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per spike | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 单株籽粒产量 Grain yield per plant/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GP | N0 | 51.76±1.64 ab | 2.90±0.22 f | 14.07±0.61 c | 39.85±1.86 ab | 1.51±0.08 c |
N160 | 52.06±2.85 ab | 3.46±0.33 def | 18.64±1.15 ab | 44.63±1.96 a | 2.35±0.19 bc | |
N230 | 50.81±0.09 ab | 3.29±0.19 ef | 16.22±0.01 bc | 42.96±0.57 a | 3.09±0.08 ab | |
N300 | 54.62±3.36 a | 4.57±0.19 bcd | 17.96±2.15 abc | 43.99±1.22 a | 3.37±0.01 a | |
T | N0 | 45.69±1.71 b | 4.29±0.04 cde | 17.50±1.83 abc | 37.96±1.27 ab | 2.11±0.33 c |
N160 | 46.90±0.20 b | 5.85±0.89 a | 20.58±0.05 a | 31.55±1.37 b | 3.92±0.31 a | |
N230 | 45.93±0.13 b | 5.09±0.11 abc | 19.09±1.39 ab | 31.81±1.76 b | 3.32±0.22 a | |
N300 | 47.45±0.88 b | 5.54±0.04 ab | 21.19±0.65 a | 32.93±0.50 b | 3.79±0.03 a |
Fig. 1 Aboveground biomass in different growth periodsNote:Different lowercase letters in same period indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Nitrogen contents of ear, leaf and stemNote:Different lowercase letters in same period indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
材料Material | 处理Treatment | 穗 Ear | 叶 Leaf | 茎秆 Stem | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
扬花期FP | 灌浆期FS | 成熟期MP | 扬花期FP | 灌浆期FS | 成熟期MP | 扬花期FP | 灌浆期FS | 成熟期MP | |||||||||||
氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | ||
GP | N0 | 16.87±0.64 d | 37.56 | 40.55±0.75 a | 69.99 | 28.31±1.10 e | 63.30 | 17.62±0.42 e | 39.23 | 4.75±0.51 e | 8.21 | 11.00±0.12 g | 24.61 | 10.43±0.25 e | 23.21 | 12.63±0.42 f | 21.81 | 5.41±0.11 e | 12.10 |
N160 | 21.18±0.68 c | 23.59 | 37.72±0.57 c | 35.62 | 34.10±1.42 d | 38.27 | 41.93±0.53 d | 46.69 | 26.06±0.18 c | 24.61 | 24.64±0.11 e | 27.65 | 26.68±0.82 c | 29.72 | 42.11±0.76 c | 39.77 | 30.37±0.13 b | 34.08 | |
N230 | 33.31±0.84 a | 27.39 | 33.76±0.68 d | 33.93 | 40.37±1.23 c | 36.50 | 54.75±0.52 b | 45.01 | 32.39±0.63 b | 32.55 | 34.75±0.11 b | 31.42 | 33.57±0.21 a | 27.60 | 33.36±0.15 d | 33.53 | 35.49±0.43 a | 32.08 | |
N300 | 33.73±0.25 a | 28.11 | 48.51±1.22 bc | 49.84 | 50.79±0.32 b | 51.23 | 52.37±0.80 c | 43.65 | 25.21±0.82 c | 25.90 | 22.88±0.18 f | 23.08 | 33.88±0.43 a | 28.24 | 23.62±0.12 e | 24.27 | 25.46±0.94 c | 25.69 | |
T | N0 | 22.20±0.18 c | 44.00 | 27.63±0.34 e | 63.63 | 31.06±0.55 e | 68.01 | 17.66±0.82 e | 35.00 | 6.70±0.61 d | 15.43 | 8.44±0.16 h | 18.49 | 9.09±0.30 e | 20.94 | 10.6±0.11 g | 21.00 | 6.16±1.01 f | 13.49 |
N160 | 31.34±0.20 b | 25.35 | 41.50±1.10 b | 31.04 | 54.45±1.85 a | 50.65 | 60.33±1.02 a | 48.81 | 37.63±0.86 a | 28.15 | 31.33±0.44 c | 29.15 | 31.95±0.33 b | 25.84 | 54.56±0.51 b | 40.81 | 21.71±0.76 d | 20.20 | |
N230 | 34.05±0.82 a | 28.78 | 50.82±0.56 a | 47.16 | 54.07±1.55 a | 51.89 | 59.13±1.11 a | 49.98 | 32.99±0.65 b | 30.61 | 28.16±0.42 d | 27.02 | 23.95±0.39 d | 21.24 | 25.13±0.64 e | 22.23 | 21.97±0.19 d | 21.09 | |
N300 | 31.33±0.22 b | 27.24 | 41.42±0.50 b | 31.08 | 49.17±0.65 b | 44.07 | 51.71±0.85 c | 44.96 | 32.69±0.27 b | 24.52 | 36.44±0.32 a | 32.67 | 31.98±0.47 b | 27.80 | 59.18±0.84 a | 44.40 | 25.94±1.09 c | 23.25 |
Table 2 Accumulation and proportion of nitrogen in ears, leaves and stems
材料Material | 处理Treatment | 穗 Ear | 叶 Leaf | 茎秆 Stem | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
扬花期FP | 灌浆期FS | 成熟期MP | 扬花期FP | 灌浆期FS | 成熟期MP | 扬花期FP | 灌浆期FS | 成熟期MP | |||||||||||
氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | 氮积 累量 NA/mg | 比例Proportion/% | ||
GP | N0 | 16.87±0.64 d | 37.56 | 40.55±0.75 a | 69.99 | 28.31±1.10 e | 63.30 | 17.62±0.42 e | 39.23 | 4.75±0.51 e | 8.21 | 11.00±0.12 g | 24.61 | 10.43±0.25 e | 23.21 | 12.63±0.42 f | 21.81 | 5.41±0.11 e | 12.10 |
N160 | 21.18±0.68 c | 23.59 | 37.72±0.57 c | 35.62 | 34.10±1.42 d | 38.27 | 41.93±0.53 d | 46.69 | 26.06±0.18 c | 24.61 | 24.64±0.11 e | 27.65 | 26.68±0.82 c | 29.72 | 42.11±0.76 c | 39.77 | 30.37±0.13 b | 34.08 | |
N230 | 33.31±0.84 a | 27.39 | 33.76±0.68 d | 33.93 | 40.37±1.23 c | 36.50 | 54.75±0.52 b | 45.01 | 32.39±0.63 b | 32.55 | 34.75±0.11 b | 31.42 | 33.57±0.21 a | 27.60 | 33.36±0.15 d | 33.53 | 35.49±0.43 a | 32.08 | |
N300 | 33.73±0.25 a | 28.11 | 48.51±1.22 bc | 49.84 | 50.79±0.32 b | 51.23 | 52.37±0.80 c | 43.65 | 25.21±0.82 c | 25.90 | 22.88±0.18 f | 23.08 | 33.88±0.43 a | 28.24 | 23.62±0.12 e | 24.27 | 25.46±0.94 c | 25.69 | |
T | N0 | 22.20±0.18 c | 44.00 | 27.63±0.34 e | 63.63 | 31.06±0.55 e | 68.01 | 17.66±0.82 e | 35.00 | 6.70±0.61 d | 15.43 | 8.44±0.16 h | 18.49 | 9.09±0.30 e | 20.94 | 10.6±0.11 g | 21.00 | 6.16±1.01 f | 13.49 |
N160 | 31.34±0.20 b | 25.35 | 41.50±1.10 b | 31.04 | 54.45±1.85 a | 50.65 | 60.33±1.02 a | 48.81 | 37.63±0.86 a | 28.15 | 31.33±0.44 c | 29.15 | 31.95±0.33 b | 25.84 | 54.56±0.51 b | 40.81 | 21.71±0.76 d | 20.20 | |
N230 | 34.05±0.82 a | 28.78 | 50.82±0.56 a | 47.16 | 54.07±1.55 a | 51.89 | 59.13±1.11 a | 49.98 | 32.99±0.65 b | 30.61 | 28.16±0.42 d | 27.02 | 23.95±0.39 d | 21.24 | 25.13±0.64 e | 22.23 | 21.97±0.19 d | 21.09 | |
N300 | 31.33±0.22 b | 27.24 | 41.42±0.50 b | 31.08 | 49.17±0.65 b | 44.07 | 51.71±0.85 c | 44.96 | 32.69±0.27 b | 24.52 | 36.44±0.32 a | 32.67 | 31.98±0.47 b | 27.80 | 59.18±0.84 a | 44.40 | 25.94±1.09 c | 23.25 |
材料Material | 处理 Treatment | 干物质转运量DMT/g | 干物质转运率 DMTR/% | 营养器官氮素 转运量 NT/g | 营养器官氮素 转运率 NTR/% | 氮素转运量对穗的贡献率CRNTE/% | 氮肥农学利用率 NAE/% | 氮肥偏生产力 NPP | 氮转 移量 NT/g | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗 Ear | 叶 Leaf | 茎秆Stem | |||||||||
GP | N0 | 9.21±0.02 | 0.97±0.03 | 0.06±0.00 | 3.86±0.01 | 3.84±0.02 h | 7.60± 0.07 d | 12.68±0.01 f | 0.83±0.01 h | ||
N160 | 9.85±0.01 | 1.84±0.04 | 4.58±0.04 | 23.04±0.08 | 3.93±0.04 g | 4.51± 0.04 f | 11.51±0.07 g | 2.49±0.01 f | 7.04±0.05 c | 2.85±0.04 f | |
N230 | 10.48±0.04 | 1.34±0.04 | 3.90± 0.03 | 17.40±0.06 | 5.70± 0.07 e | 4.90± 0.07 e | 14.13±0.04 e | 3.44±0.02 b | 6.78±0.04 d | 9.13±0.04 d | |
N300 | 13.96±0.01 | 2.23±0.02 | 6.12±0.04 | 12.37±0.04 | 22.76±0.01 a | 19.93±0.04 a | 52.83±0.16 a | 3.21±0.02 c | 5.85±0.05 f | 20.84±0.04a | |
T | N0 | 13.06±0.02 | 0.67±0.03 | 1.38±0.02 | 9.09± 0.02 | 8.04±0.03 d | 15.51±0.04 c | 31.91±0.07 d | 5.26±0.02 e | ||
N160 | 14.77±0.02 | 1.43±0.02 | -6.00± 0.03 | 13.40±0.03 | 17.97±0.01 c | 15.48±0.06 c | 35.11±0.08 c | 5.42±0.02 a | 11.74±0.06 a | 10.84±0.03 c | |
N230 | 15.59±0.01 | 1.77±0.04 | 4.09±0.02 | 6.92±0.03 | 21.61±0.04 b | 19.04±0.04 b | 43.95±0.12 b | 2.65±0.01 e | 7.28±0.04 b | 18.92±0.04 b | |
N300 | 12.63±0.01 | 0.76±0.03 | 3.07±0.04 | 12.37±0.04 | 4.61±0.01 f | 4.20± 0.04 f | 10.80± 0.04 g | 2.92±0.01 d | 6.58±0.02 e | 1.69±0.03 g |
Table 3 Nitrogen transfer rate, transfer rate, dry matter transfer rate, transfer rate, agronomic utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer, partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer in different barley vegetative organs
材料Material | 处理 Treatment | 干物质转运量DMT/g | 干物质转运率 DMTR/% | 营养器官氮素 转运量 NT/g | 营养器官氮素 转运率 NTR/% | 氮素转运量对穗的贡献率CRNTE/% | 氮肥农学利用率 NAE/% | 氮肥偏生产力 NPP | 氮转 移量 NT/g | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗 Ear | 叶 Leaf | 茎秆Stem | |||||||||
GP | N0 | 9.21±0.02 | 0.97±0.03 | 0.06±0.00 | 3.86±0.01 | 3.84±0.02 h | 7.60± 0.07 d | 12.68±0.01 f | 0.83±0.01 h | ||
N160 | 9.85±0.01 | 1.84±0.04 | 4.58±0.04 | 23.04±0.08 | 3.93±0.04 g | 4.51± 0.04 f | 11.51±0.07 g | 2.49±0.01 f | 7.04±0.05 c | 2.85±0.04 f | |
N230 | 10.48±0.04 | 1.34±0.04 | 3.90± 0.03 | 17.40±0.06 | 5.70± 0.07 e | 4.90± 0.07 e | 14.13±0.04 e | 3.44±0.02 b | 6.78±0.04 d | 9.13±0.04 d | |
N300 | 13.96±0.01 | 2.23±0.02 | 6.12±0.04 | 12.37±0.04 | 22.76±0.01 a | 19.93±0.04 a | 52.83±0.16 a | 3.21±0.02 c | 5.85±0.05 f | 20.84±0.04a | |
T | N0 | 13.06±0.02 | 0.67±0.03 | 1.38±0.02 | 9.09± 0.02 | 8.04±0.03 d | 15.51±0.04 c | 31.91±0.07 d | 5.26±0.02 e | ||
N160 | 14.77±0.02 | 1.43±0.02 | -6.00± 0.03 | 13.40±0.03 | 17.97±0.01 c | 15.48±0.06 c | 35.11±0.08 c | 5.42±0.02 a | 11.74±0.06 a | 10.84±0.03 c | |
N230 | 15.59±0.01 | 1.77±0.04 | 4.09±0.02 | 6.92±0.03 | 21.61±0.04 b | 19.04±0.04 b | 43.95±0.12 b | 2.65±0.01 e | 7.28±0.04 b | 18.92±0.04 b | |
N300 | 12.63±0.01 | 0.76±0.03 | 3.07±0.04 | 12.37±0.04 | 4.61±0.01 f | 4.20± 0.04 f | 10.80± 0.04 g | 2.92±0.01 d | 6.58±0.02 e | 1.69±0.03 g |
材料 Material | 器官 Organ | 生育期 Period | 单株产量Yield per plant | 氮素含量 Nitrogen content | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗 Ear | 叶 Leaf | 茎秆 Stem | 地上部 Above ground | ||||||||||||
扬花期FP | 灌浆期 GP | 成熟期 MP | 扬花期 FP | 灌浆期 GP | 成熟期MP | 扬花期FP | 灌浆期GP | 成熟期MP | 扬花期 FP | 灌浆期GP | 成熟期MP | ||||
GP | 穗 Ear | 扬花期FP | 0.567 | ||||||||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.516 | 0.147 | |||||||||||||
成熟期MP | 0.575 | 0.991** | 0.221 | ||||||||||||
叶 Leaf | 扬花期FP | 0.661 | 0.783 | 0.300 | 0.853 | ||||||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.712 | 0.858 | 0.218 | 0.911 | 0.989* | ||||||||||
成熟期MP | 0.223 | 0.653 | 0.719 | 0.740 | 0.879 | 0.831 | |||||||||
茎秆 Stem | 扬花期FP | 0.810 | 0.838 | 0.071 | 0.885 | 0.968* | 0.989* | 0.743 | |||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.630 | 0.079 | -0.038 | 0.180 | 0.643 | 0.566 | 0.439 | 0.609 | |||||||
成熟期MP | 0.604 | 0.532 | 0.321 | 0.632 | 0.943 | 0.889 | 0.843 | 0.873 | 0.836 | ||||||
地上部 Above ground | 扬花期FP | 0.672 | 0.935 | 0.219 | 0.970* | 0.952* | 0.984* | 0.807 | 0.966* | 0.412 | 0.797 | ||||
灌浆期GP | 0.473 | 0.597 | 0.495 | 0.696 | 0.953* | 0.898 | 0.939 | 0.853 | 0.712 | 0.977* | 0.829 | ||||
成熟期MP | 0.578 | 0.810 | 0.395 | 0.879 | 0.992** | 0.981* | 0.921 | 0.944 | 0.564 | 0.918 | 0.958* | 0.954* | |||
T | 地上部 Above ground | 成熟期MP | 0.606 | 0.720 | 0.215 | 0.863 | 0.873 | 0.893 | 0.301 | 0.680 | 0.413 | 0.868 | 0.958* | 0.954* | |
灌浆期GP | 0.622 | 0.733 | 0.375 | 0.788 | 0.816 | 0.819 | 0.033 | 0.580 | 0.326 | 0.740 | 0.829 | ||||
扬花期FP | 0.586 | 0.687 | 0.094 | 0.889 | 0.881 | 0.913 | 0.551 | 0.757 | 0.510 | 0.938 | |||||
茎秆 Stem | 成熟期MP | 0.795 | 0.851 | 0.338 | 0.980* | 0.968* | 0.982* | 0.687 | 0.936 | 0.777 | |||||
灌浆期GP | 0.908 | 0.861 | 0.666 | 0.816 | 0.800 | 0.778 | 0.706 | 0.947 | |||||||
扬花期FP | 0.923 | 0.926 | 0.572 | 0.956* | 0.944 | 0.936 | 0.708 | ||||||||
叶 Leaf | 成熟期MP | 0.407 | 0.390 | -0.057 | 0.577 | 0.525 | 0.556 | ||||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.866 | 0.921 | 0.476 | 0.998** | 0.997** | ||||||||||
扬花期FP | 0.900 | 0.948 | 0.542 | 0.998** | |||||||||||
穗 Ear | 成熟期MP | 0.890 | 0.936 | 0.511 | |||||||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.836 | 0.780 | |||||||||||||
扬花期FP | 0.988* |
Table 4 Correlation between the yield per plant of different barley and the nitrogen content of various vegetative organs in different periods
材料 Material | 器官 Organ | 生育期 Period | 单株产量Yield per plant | 氮素含量 Nitrogen content | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗 Ear | 叶 Leaf | 茎秆 Stem | 地上部 Above ground | ||||||||||||
扬花期FP | 灌浆期 GP | 成熟期 MP | 扬花期 FP | 灌浆期 GP | 成熟期MP | 扬花期FP | 灌浆期GP | 成熟期MP | 扬花期 FP | 灌浆期GP | 成熟期MP | ||||
GP | 穗 Ear | 扬花期FP | 0.567 | ||||||||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.516 | 0.147 | |||||||||||||
成熟期MP | 0.575 | 0.991** | 0.221 | ||||||||||||
叶 Leaf | 扬花期FP | 0.661 | 0.783 | 0.300 | 0.853 | ||||||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.712 | 0.858 | 0.218 | 0.911 | 0.989* | ||||||||||
成熟期MP | 0.223 | 0.653 | 0.719 | 0.740 | 0.879 | 0.831 | |||||||||
茎秆 Stem | 扬花期FP | 0.810 | 0.838 | 0.071 | 0.885 | 0.968* | 0.989* | 0.743 | |||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.630 | 0.079 | -0.038 | 0.180 | 0.643 | 0.566 | 0.439 | 0.609 | |||||||
成熟期MP | 0.604 | 0.532 | 0.321 | 0.632 | 0.943 | 0.889 | 0.843 | 0.873 | 0.836 | ||||||
地上部 Above ground | 扬花期FP | 0.672 | 0.935 | 0.219 | 0.970* | 0.952* | 0.984* | 0.807 | 0.966* | 0.412 | 0.797 | ||||
灌浆期GP | 0.473 | 0.597 | 0.495 | 0.696 | 0.953* | 0.898 | 0.939 | 0.853 | 0.712 | 0.977* | 0.829 | ||||
成熟期MP | 0.578 | 0.810 | 0.395 | 0.879 | 0.992** | 0.981* | 0.921 | 0.944 | 0.564 | 0.918 | 0.958* | 0.954* | |||
T | 地上部 Above ground | 成熟期MP | 0.606 | 0.720 | 0.215 | 0.863 | 0.873 | 0.893 | 0.301 | 0.680 | 0.413 | 0.868 | 0.958* | 0.954* | |
灌浆期GP | 0.622 | 0.733 | 0.375 | 0.788 | 0.816 | 0.819 | 0.033 | 0.580 | 0.326 | 0.740 | 0.829 | ||||
扬花期FP | 0.586 | 0.687 | 0.094 | 0.889 | 0.881 | 0.913 | 0.551 | 0.757 | 0.510 | 0.938 | |||||
茎秆 Stem | 成熟期MP | 0.795 | 0.851 | 0.338 | 0.980* | 0.968* | 0.982* | 0.687 | 0.936 | 0.777 | |||||
灌浆期GP | 0.908 | 0.861 | 0.666 | 0.816 | 0.800 | 0.778 | 0.706 | 0.947 | |||||||
扬花期FP | 0.923 | 0.926 | 0.572 | 0.956* | 0.944 | 0.936 | 0.708 | ||||||||
叶 Leaf | 成熟期MP | 0.407 | 0.390 | -0.057 | 0.577 | 0.525 | 0.556 | ||||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.866 | 0.921 | 0.476 | 0.998** | 0.997** | ||||||||||
扬花期FP | 0.900 | 0.948 | 0.542 | 0.998** | |||||||||||
穗 Ear | 成熟期MP | 0.890 | 0.936 | 0.511 | |||||||||||
灌浆期GP | 0.836 | 0.780 | |||||||||||||
扬花期FP | 0.988* |
1 | 魏胜文,乔德华,张东伟.甘肃农业发展研究报告(2011—2015)[R].北京:社会科学出版社,2016. |
WEI S W, QIAO D H, ZHANG D W. Gansu agricultural development research report (2011—2015) [R]. Beijing: Social Science Press, 2016. | |
2 | 杨建明,林峰,尚毅,等.2009—2010年大麦产业技术现状与发展趋势[J].浙江农业学报,2010,22(5):683-688. |
YANG J M, LIN F, SHANG Y, et al.. The status and development trend of barley industry technology from 2009 to 2010 [J]. Zhejiang Agric. Sci., 2010, 22(5):683-688. | |
3 | JONASSEN I B, INGVERSEN J, BRANDT A. Synthesis of SPII albumin, β-amylase and chymotrypsin inhibitor CI-1 on polysomes from the endoplasmic reticulum of barley endosperm [J]. Carlsberg Res. Comm., 1981, 46:175-181. |
4 | MASCHER M, GUNDLACH H, HIMMELBACH A, et al.. Achromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of thebarley genome [J]. Nature, 2017, 544(7651):427-433. |
5 | GRANT C A, GAURE L E, GEHL D T, et al.. Protein production and nitrogen utilization by barley cultivars in response to nitrogen fertilizer under varying moisture conditions [J]. Canadian J. Plant Sci., 1991, 71:997-1009. |
6 | PAPAKOSTA D K G A. Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, remobilization, and losses for mediterranean wheat during grain filling [J]. Agron. J., 1991, 85(3):864-870. |
7 | 王健,韩金玲,杨敏,等.不同氮高效玉米品种对氮素的吸收转运和代谢研究[J].核农学报,2020,34(12):2800-2812. |
WANG J, HAN J L, YANG M, et al.. Study on nitrogen absorption, transportation and metabolism of different nitrogen-efficient maize varieties [J]. Chin. J. Nucl. Agric., 2020, 34(12): 2800-2812. | |
8 | 王晓芸,马增科,孟亚雄.不同基因型大麦苗期氮素利用效率的评价分析[J].大麦与谷类科学,2018,35(3):5- 16. |
WANG X Y, MA Z K, MENG Y X. Evaluation and analysis of nitrogen use efficiency of different genotypes of barley at seedling stage [J]. Barley Cereal Sci., 2018, 35(3):5-16. | |
9 | 潘永东,王效宗,包奇军,等.氮素肥料对啤酒大麦产量和麦芽品质的影响[[J].农业现代化研究,2007,28 (4):80-82 . |
PAN Y D, WANG X Z, BAO Q J, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on malting barley yield and malt quality [J]. Res.Agric. Mod., 2007, 28 (4):80-82. | |
10 | 李赢.大麦NRT2/3基因家族分析及其功能验证[D].扬州:扬州大学,2019. |
LI Y. Barley NRT2/3 gene family analysis and functional verification [D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2019. | |
11 | 李静雯,张正英,令利军,等.利用RNAi 抑制B-hordein 合成降低大麦籽粒蛋白质含量[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(19):3746-3756. |
LI J W, ZHANG Z Y, LING L J, et al.. Using RNAi to inhibit B-hordein synthesis and reduce the protein content of barley grains [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci., 2014, 47(19):3746-3756. | |
12 | 许明,封超年,李长亚,等.氮肥对啤酒大麦籽粒品质的影响[J].扬州大学学报,2004,25 (2):34-38. |
XU M, FENG C N, LI C Y, et al.. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on malting barley grain quality [J]. J. Yangzhou Univ., 2004, 25(2):34-38. | |
13 | 徐银萍.不同氮磷水平对啤酒大麦产量和品质及氮肥农学效率的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,11(44):77-83. |
XU Y P. The effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on the yield and quality of malting barley and the agronomic efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer [J]. J. Northwest A&F Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2016, 11(44):77-83. | |
14 | 刘盈盈,高晓阳,武季玲,等.甘啤大麦氮素运移模型模拟试验研究[J].中国农机化学报,2016,37(10):98-102. |
LIU Y Y, GAO X Y, WU J L, et al.. Study on the simulation experiment of nitrogen transport model in sweet beer barley [J]. Chin. J. Agric. Mach. Chem., 2016, 37(10):98-102. | |
15 | 张金灿.种植密度和施氮量对啤用大麦生长、产量及品质的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2016. |
ZHANG J C. The effect of planting density and nitrogen application rate on the growth, yield and quality of beer barley [D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016. | |
16 | 徐寿军,刘志萍,张凤英,等.氮肥水平对冬大麦产量、品质和氮肥利用效率的影响及其相关分析[J].扬州大学学报( 农业与生命科学版),2012,33(1):66-71. |
XU S J, LIU Z P, ZHANG F Y, et al.. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer level on winter barley yield, quality and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency and its correlation analysis [J]. J. Yangzhou Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.), 2012, 33(1):66-71. | |
17 | 沈会权,栾海业,陈和.施氮水平对啤酒大麦氮素吸收、转运及籽粒蛋白质含量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2013,29(5):1034-1038. |
SHEN H Q, LUAN H Y, CHEN H. Effects of nitrogen application level on nitrogen absorption, transport and grain protein content of malting barley [J]. J. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2013, 29(5):1034-1038. | |
18 | 蔡剑.氮钾肥对啤酒大麦籽粒产量和蛋白质形成的影响及其生理机制[D].南京:南京农业大学,2009. |
CAI J. Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers on the grain yield and protein formation of malting barley and its physiological mechanism [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2009. | |
19 | GAUFICHON L, REISDORF-CREN M, ROTHSTEIN S J, et al.. Biological functions of asparagine synthetase in plants [J]. Plant Sci., 2010, 179(3):141-153. |
20 | 李东方,李世清,张胜利.不同基因型冬小麦干物质运移及其对氮的反应[J].河南农业科学,2006 (8):34-36. |
LI D F, LI S Q, ZHANG S L. Dry matter transport of different genotypes of winter wheat and its response to nitrogen [J]. Henan Agric. Sci., 2006(8):34-36. | |
21 | 丁锦峰,丁永刚,李福建,等.稻茬晚播小麦氮高效品种氮素积累、分配与利用特征[C]//2018中国作物学会学术年会论文摘要集.北京:中国农业科技出版社,2018. |
22 | 黄亿.氮高效利用基因型大麦筛选及氮素吸收转运特性[D].成都:四川农业大学,2014. |
HUANG Y. Screening of genotypes of barley with high nitrogen utilization and characteristics of nitrogen absorption and transport [D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2014. | |
23 | 左青松,杨海燕,冷锁虎,等.施氮量对油菜氮素积累和运转及氮素利用率的影响[J].作物学报,2014,40(3):511-518 . |
ZUO Q S, YANG H Y, LENG S H, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate on the accumulation and transfer of nitrogen and nitrogen utilization efficiency in rape [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2014, 40(3):511-518. | |
24 | 董桂春,王余龙,周娟,等.不同氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种氮素分配与运转的差异[J].作物学报,2009,35(1):149-155. |
DONG G C, WANG Y L, ZHOU J, et al.. Differences in nitrogen distribution and translocation of indica rice varieties with different nitrogen grain production efficiency types [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2009, 35(1):149-155. | |
25 | 高润红,徐红卫,郭桂梅,等.两份大麦纯合突变体与其原始品种的氮素吸收利用差异[J].植物生理学报,2020,56 (4):863-870. |
GAO R H, XU H W, GUO G M, et al.. Differences in nitrogen absorption and utilization between two homozygous barley mutants and their original varieties [J]. Acta Plant Physiol., 2020, 56(4):863-870. | |
26 | 德木其格.栽培措施对大麦淀粉与可溶性糖含量的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古民族大学,2020. |
DE M Q G. The effect of cultivation measures on the content of barley starch and soluble sugar [D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, 2020. | |
27 | 苏丙华,徐炜,张娟,等. 施氮量对超高产小麦品种济麦22号产量和氮素利用效率的影响 [J].山东农业科学,2012,44(8):78-80. |
SU B H, XU W, ZHANG J, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of super high-yield wheat variety Jimai 22 [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2012, 44(8):78-80. | |
28 | 张如标,王蓓蓓,丁焕新,等.氮肥对耐盐啤酒大麦产量、品质及光合功能的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2013,33(1):162-168. |
ZHANG R B, WANG B B, DING H X, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield, quality and photosynthetic function of salt-tolerant malting barley [J]. Acta Triticeae Sin., 2013, 33(1):162-168. |
[1] | Xiuwen HU, Bo DENG, Jinbin WANG, Hua LIU, Xueming TANG, Yu WANG, Haijuan ZENG, Wei JIANG, Hong LI. Rapid Detection of CP4-EPSPS Transgenic Products Based on RPA Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 227-233. |
[2] | Guoqing LU, Caixia MA, Guoqing SUN, Huiming GUO, Hongmei CHENG. Molecular Characterization and Inheritance Stability Analysis of Herbicide-resistant Cotton GV-2 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 42-49. |
[3] | Li LIU, Zhongping DU, Yi LI, Laisheng CHEN, Rui HAN. Effect of NaOH Pretreatment on Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Hulless Barley Straw [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 192-200. |
[4] | Zhenjia HE, Tongle SHI, Yuliang FU, Liangjun FEI. Effect of Emitter Spacing on Nitrogen Transport Characteristics of Intersecting Two Point Sources in Bubbled-root Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 157-169. |
[5] | Qijun BAO, Yongdong PAN, Huayu ZHANG, Xiaoning LIU, Dongjia ZHANG, Feng ZHAO, Xiaoxia NIU, Jun CHEN. Analysis of Agronomic and Quality Characters of Beer Barley from Gansu and Europe, North America [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 57-66. |
[6] | Junjie ZOU, Miaoyun XU, Lan ZHANG, Yanzhong LUO, Yuan LIU, Hongyan ZHENG, Lei WANG. Molecular Characterizations of Stacked Transgenic Maize BBHTL8-1 with Insect Resistance, Glyphosate Tolerance and Improved Quality [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 77-85. |
[7] | Yuancheng ZHOU, Yongli CAO, Zhen WANG, Zhirong JIA, Yong YAO, Aiping CHEN. Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance Indexes in Different Barley Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 86-92. |
[8] | Hao CHEN, Fei ZHOU, Yongjun LIN. Research Progress of New Crop Germplasm Enhancement in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(12): 112-119. |
[9] | Zipeng GAN, Haiyan XU, Shouye XUE, Bingyan LIANG, Biying CHONG, Lisha LI, Bo ZHANG, Xiaoming LI, Guimin LIU, Xiaodong WU. Quality of Hulless Barley in Different Climatic Regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(11): 55-67. |
[10] | Zhong ZHUANG, Long ZHAO, Hao BAI, Yulin BI, Yingquan HUANG, Guohong CHEN, Guobin CHANG. Development of CRISPR/Cas9 and Its Application in Poultry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 14-23. |
[11] | Xiaoqian MA, Tao YANG, Quan ZHANG, Hongliang ZHANG. Development Status and Prospect of Rice New Breeding Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 24-30. |
[12] | Junjie ZOU, Miaoyun XU, Lan ZHANG, Hongyan ZHENG, Lei WANG. Molecular Characteristics and Functional Evaluation of Transgenic Maize BFL4-1 With Stacked Insect and Herbicide Resistance Traits [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 31-37. |
[13] | LI Shengmei, ZHANG Dawei, DILIBAIER Dilimaimaiti, WEI Xin, RUI Cun, YANG Tao, GENG Shiwei, GAO Wenwei. Influence of Reduced Irrigation on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Fiber Quality of Transgenic ScALDH21 Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 152-159. |
[14] | LI Chengchen, SUO Haicui, LUO Huanming, AN Kang, LIU Jitao, WANG Li, SHAN Jianwei, YANG Shaohai, LI Xiaobo. Effects of Reduced Fertilizer Application and Fertilization Methods on Potato Yield and Tuber Nitrogen Accumulation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 173-182. |
[15] | CHEN Yuan, LIU Zhenyu, ZHOU Mingyuan, ZHANG Chenxia, TIAN Qiaofeng, ZHANG Zhongning, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN Dehua. Effect of Planting Density on the Expression of Insecticidal Protein and Nitrogen Metabolism in the Fiber of Bt Transgenic Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 45-53. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||