Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 189-196.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0808
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Wenjun ZHAO1(), Jizhou YANG1, Mei YIN2, Jianfeng CHEN2, Kaizheng XUE1, Baowen HU1, Libo FU2, Wei WANG2, Zhiyuan WANG2, Yanxian YANG2, Hua CHEN2(
)
Received:
2021-09-13
Accepted:
2022-01-18
Online:
2023-04-01
Published:
2023-06-26
Contact:
Hua CHEN
赵文军1(), 杨继周1, 尹梅2, 陈检锋2, 薛开政1, 胡保文1, 付利波2, 王伟2, 王志远2, 杨艳鲜2, 陈华2(
)
通讯作者:
陈华
作者简介:
赵文军 E-mail:zhaowenjun19840207@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Wenjun ZHAO, Jizhou YANG, Mei YIN, Jianfeng CHEN, Kaizheng XUE, Baowen HU, Libo FU, Wei WANG, Zhiyuan WANG, Yanxian YANG, Hua CHEN. Effects of Combined Application of Green Manure with Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 189-196.
赵文军, 杨继周, 尹梅, 陈检锋, 薛开政, 胡保文, 付利波, 王伟, 王志远, 杨艳鲜, 陈华. 绿肥模式下减量施氮对烤烟产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 189-196.
种植模式 Plant pattern | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎围 Stem girth/cm | 有效叶 Effective blade | 最大叶面积 Maximum leaf area/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
G | N0 | 87.67±7.83 dα | 10.66±0.54 aα | 17.89±1.17 cα | 1 005.30±205.70 aα |
N55 | 101.22±7.16 cα | 10.39±0.67 aα | 20.78±1.48 abα | 1 074.35±79.99 aα | |
N70 | 119.22±7.79 abα | 10.06±0.25 aα | 21.67±2.18 aα | 1 087.53±130.28 aα | |
N85 | 120.56±7.72 aα | 11.17±0.17 aα | 21.67±2.45 aα | 979.10±112.90 aα | |
N100 | 112.56±6.93 bα | 9.62±0.83 aα | 20.11±1.05 abα | 844.52±220.76 aα | |
F | N0 | 89.11±7.13 cα | 10.50±0.75 aα | 17.67±1.50 cα | 863.98±156.94 aβ |
N55 | 105.00±4.85 bα | 9.67±1.15 aα | 18.00±1.00 cα | 956.65±243.06 aα | |
N70 | 112.56±7.55 aβ | 10.56±0.75 aα | 19.22±1.56 bcβ | 1 089.93±228.33 aα | |
N85 | 112.78±5.72 aα | 10.61±0.48 aα | 20.44±0.88 aα | 1 007.55±202.36 aα | |
N100 | 113.00±7.26 aα | 10.58±0.81 aα | 20.33±2.29 abα | 963.28±176.92 aα | |
FG | 13.59** | 0.16 | 3.36* | 0.91 | |
FN | 0.61 | 1.43 | 3.18* | 1.32 | |
FG×N | 3.00* | 1.52 | 3.48* | 2.47* |
Table 1 Agronomic traits of flue-cured tobacco under different treatments
种植模式 Plant pattern | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎围 Stem girth/cm | 有效叶 Effective blade | 最大叶面积 Maximum leaf area/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
G | N0 | 87.67±7.83 dα | 10.66±0.54 aα | 17.89±1.17 cα | 1 005.30±205.70 aα |
N55 | 101.22±7.16 cα | 10.39±0.67 aα | 20.78±1.48 abα | 1 074.35±79.99 aα | |
N70 | 119.22±7.79 abα | 10.06±0.25 aα | 21.67±2.18 aα | 1 087.53±130.28 aα | |
N85 | 120.56±7.72 aα | 11.17±0.17 aα | 21.67±2.45 aα | 979.10±112.90 aα | |
N100 | 112.56±6.93 bα | 9.62±0.83 aα | 20.11±1.05 abα | 844.52±220.76 aα | |
F | N0 | 89.11±7.13 cα | 10.50±0.75 aα | 17.67±1.50 cα | 863.98±156.94 aβ |
N55 | 105.00±4.85 bα | 9.67±1.15 aα | 18.00±1.00 cα | 956.65±243.06 aα | |
N70 | 112.56±7.55 aβ | 10.56±0.75 aα | 19.22±1.56 bcβ | 1 089.93±228.33 aα | |
N85 | 112.78±5.72 aα | 10.61±0.48 aα | 20.44±0.88 aα | 1 007.55±202.36 aα | |
N100 | 113.00±7.26 aα | 10.58±0.81 aα | 20.33±2.29 abα | 963.28±176.92 aα | |
FG | 13.59** | 0.16 | 3.36* | 0.91 | |
FN | 0.61 | 1.43 | 3.18* | 1.32 | |
FG×N | 3.00* | 1.52 | 3.48* | 2.47* |
种植模式 Plant pattern | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 比例Proportion/% | 均价/(元·kg-1) Average price/(yuan·kg-1) | 产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/ (yuan·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上等烟 Superior leaves | 中上等烟 Mid-high grade leaves | |||||
G | N0 | 1 859.19±67.21 dα | 54.69±1.89 cα | 88.97±4.37 aα | 28.49±0.58 cα | 52 976.29±10.38 dα |
N55 | 2 305.07±65.45 bcα | 55.05±1.60 cα | 87.63±5.27 aα | 30.67±1.14 abα | 70 655.95±7.66 bα | |
N70 | 2 449.89±62.72 abα | 58.21±0.58 abα | 91.75±1.41 aα | 32.04±0.83 aα | 78 519.33±17.46 aα | |
N85 | 2 219.50±160.96 cβ | 60.77±2.09 aα | 87.58±0.91 aα | 28.66±1.22 bcα | 63 658.44±27.39 cα | |
N100 | 2 575.28±124.16 aα | 55.42±1.71 bcα | 85.67±4.04 aα | 28.58±1.74 bcα | 73 469.00±3.77 abα | |
F | N0 | 1 675.18±38.47 cβ | 46.87±0.98 bβ | 80.89±4.32 bcβ | 28.13±0.57 aα | 47 123.04±6.57 cα |
N55 | 2 065.71±109.24 bβ | 54.31±2.02 aα | 80.23±4.34 bcβ | 28.95±1.22 aα | 59 895.90±25.03 bβ | |
N70 | 2 185.05±84.76 bβ | 58.09±3.74 aα | 89.73±2.71 aα | 27.30±2.12 abβ | 59 673.00±24.35 bβ | |
N85 | 2 408.22±93.42 aα | 55.16±1.71 aβ | 84.73±1.50 abα | 25.32±1.62 bβ | 60 978.52±19.61 bα | |
N100 | 2 532.94±78.26 aα | 54.77±2.58 aα | 77.53±3.08 cβ | 27.88±0.57 aα | 70 624.24±12.21 aα | |
FG | 9.84* | 15.79** | 19.87** | 21.99** | 32.83** | |
FN | 56.29** | 12.75** | 5.61* | 5.04* | 28.29** | |
FG×N | 5.87* | 4.33* | 1.01 | 3.17* | 4.51* |
Table 2 Yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco under different treatments
种植模式 Plant pattern | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 比例Proportion/% | 均价/(元·kg-1) Average price/(yuan·kg-1) | 产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/ (yuan·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上等烟 Superior leaves | 中上等烟 Mid-high grade leaves | |||||
G | N0 | 1 859.19±67.21 dα | 54.69±1.89 cα | 88.97±4.37 aα | 28.49±0.58 cα | 52 976.29±10.38 dα |
N55 | 2 305.07±65.45 bcα | 55.05±1.60 cα | 87.63±5.27 aα | 30.67±1.14 abα | 70 655.95±7.66 bα | |
N70 | 2 449.89±62.72 abα | 58.21±0.58 abα | 91.75±1.41 aα | 32.04±0.83 aα | 78 519.33±17.46 aα | |
N85 | 2 219.50±160.96 cβ | 60.77±2.09 aα | 87.58±0.91 aα | 28.66±1.22 bcα | 63 658.44±27.39 cα | |
N100 | 2 575.28±124.16 aα | 55.42±1.71 bcα | 85.67±4.04 aα | 28.58±1.74 bcα | 73 469.00±3.77 abα | |
F | N0 | 1 675.18±38.47 cβ | 46.87±0.98 bβ | 80.89±4.32 bcβ | 28.13±0.57 aα | 47 123.04±6.57 cα |
N55 | 2 065.71±109.24 bβ | 54.31±2.02 aα | 80.23±4.34 bcβ | 28.95±1.22 aα | 59 895.90±25.03 bβ | |
N70 | 2 185.05±84.76 bβ | 58.09±3.74 aα | 89.73±2.71 aα | 27.30±2.12 abβ | 59 673.00±24.35 bβ | |
N85 | 2 408.22±93.42 aα | 55.16±1.71 aβ | 84.73±1.50 abα | 25.32±1.62 bβ | 60 978.52±19.61 bα | |
N100 | 2 532.94±78.26 aα | 54.77±2.58 aα | 77.53±3.08 cβ | 27.88±0.57 aα | 70 624.24±12.21 aα | |
FG | 9.84* | 15.79** | 19.87** | 21.99** | 32.83** | |
FN | 56.29** | 12.75** | 5.61* | 5.04* | 28.29** | |
FG×N | 5.87* | 4.33* | 1.01 | 3.17* | 4.51* |
种植模式 Plant pattern | 处理 Treatment | 总糖 Total sugar/% | 还原糖 Reduced sugar/% | 烟碱 Alkaloid/% | 总氮 Total nitrogen/% | 总钾 Total potassium/% | 氯 Chlorideion/% | 糖碱比 Sugar/alkaloid | 氮碱比 Nitrogen/alkaloid | 两糖比 Reduced sugar/total sugar | 钾氯比 Potassium/chlorine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G | N0 | 26.77±2.29 aα | 11.90±0.61 cβ | 1.34±0.05 cα | 1.07±0.02 dα | 1.30±0.02 cα | 0.24±0.02 abα | 17.00±3.46 aβ | 0.93±0.03 aα | 0.68±0.08 aα | 5.85±0.41 bα |
N55 | 23.96±1.40 abβ | 21.21±0.43 aα | 1.70±0.09 bα | 1.48±0.07 cα | 1.48±0.15 cα | 0.21±0.04 bcα | 15.33±2.55 abα | 0.86±0.04 aα | 0.73±0.03 aα | 7.63±0.12 abα | |
N70 | 27.00±2.94 aα | 20.49±2.56 aα | 2.39±0.12 abα | 1.49±0.13 cβ | 1.87±0.05 abα | 0.16±0.02 dα | 12.64±0.11 bcβ | 0.91±0.06 aα | 0.68±0.05 aα | 11.45±0.99 aα | |
N85 | 18.51±1.71 cα | 14.69±0.22 bα | 2.55±0.14 aα | 1.96±0.09 bβ | 1.78±0.03 abα | 0.27±0.03 aα | 8.61±0.74 cα | 0.89±0.02 aα | 0.69±0.05 aα | 8.56±1.08 abα | |
N100 | 22.04±1.61 bcα | 13.69±1.95 bcα | 2.84±0.23 aα | 2.20±0.04 aα | 1.90±0.05 aα | 0.17±0.01 cdα | 8.05±0.88 cα | 0.83±0.06 aα | 0.69±0.06 aα | 11.23±0.76 aα | |
F | N0 | 17.52±1.05 bβ | 17.21±1.24 abcα | 1.17±0.03 dβ | 1.25±0.05 cdα | 1.31±0.19 cα | 0.22±0.03 aα | 23.07±1.79 aα | 0.92±0.02 aα | 0.64±0.04 aα | 6.01±1.35 bα |
N55 | 28.91±0.68 aα | 18.15±1.67 abβ | 1.64±0.05 cdα | 1.45±0.13 cα | 1.59±0.08 bcα | 0.18±0.01 aα | 15.77±1.08 bα | 0.90±0.05 aα | 0.76±0.03 aα | 7.69±0.53 abα | |
N70 | 30.24±2.25 aα | 18.63±2.34 aα | 1.78±0.06 cβ | 2.17±0.09 abα | 1.82±0.06 abα | 0.17±0.06 aα | 15.18±0.47 bα | 0.84±0.05 aα | 0.69±0.07 aα | 11.41±1.00 aα | |
N85 | 21.39±1.18 bα | 13.78±0.60 cα | 2.26±0.11 bα | 2.28±0.14 abα | 1.95±0.04 aα | 0.23±0.03 aα | 9.93±1.41 cα | 0.87±0.04 aα | 0.75±0.10 aα | 7.62±0.61 abα | |
N100 | 20.09±4.43 bα | 15.10±2.85 bcα | 2.61±0.05 aα | 2.33±0.18 aα | 1.83±0.09 abα | 0.19±0.07 aα | 9.44±0.95 cα | 0.84±0.01 aα | 0.68±0.08 aα | 11.20±0.83 aα | |
FG | 0.00 | 0.08 | 9.07* | 0.44 | 3.23 | 0.78 | 6.61* | 48.55** | 0.17 | 0.13 | |
FN | 16.89** | 16.82** | 19.05** | 4.36* | 1.33 | 6.37* | 9.99** | 50.59** | 1.65 | 5.09* | |
FG×N | 10.15** | 5.59* | 2.29 | 0.50 | 4.22* | 0.75 | 1.43 | 24.41** | 0.61 | 2.98* |
Table 3 Chemical component contents of flue-cured tobacco under different treatments
种植模式 Plant pattern | 处理 Treatment | 总糖 Total sugar/% | 还原糖 Reduced sugar/% | 烟碱 Alkaloid/% | 总氮 Total nitrogen/% | 总钾 Total potassium/% | 氯 Chlorideion/% | 糖碱比 Sugar/alkaloid | 氮碱比 Nitrogen/alkaloid | 两糖比 Reduced sugar/total sugar | 钾氯比 Potassium/chlorine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G | N0 | 26.77±2.29 aα | 11.90±0.61 cβ | 1.34±0.05 cα | 1.07±0.02 dα | 1.30±0.02 cα | 0.24±0.02 abα | 17.00±3.46 aβ | 0.93±0.03 aα | 0.68±0.08 aα | 5.85±0.41 bα |
N55 | 23.96±1.40 abβ | 21.21±0.43 aα | 1.70±0.09 bα | 1.48±0.07 cα | 1.48±0.15 cα | 0.21±0.04 bcα | 15.33±2.55 abα | 0.86±0.04 aα | 0.73±0.03 aα | 7.63±0.12 abα | |
N70 | 27.00±2.94 aα | 20.49±2.56 aα | 2.39±0.12 abα | 1.49±0.13 cβ | 1.87±0.05 abα | 0.16±0.02 dα | 12.64±0.11 bcβ | 0.91±0.06 aα | 0.68±0.05 aα | 11.45±0.99 aα | |
N85 | 18.51±1.71 cα | 14.69±0.22 bα | 2.55±0.14 aα | 1.96±0.09 bβ | 1.78±0.03 abα | 0.27±0.03 aα | 8.61±0.74 cα | 0.89±0.02 aα | 0.69±0.05 aα | 8.56±1.08 abα | |
N100 | 22.04±1.61 bcα | 13.69±1.95 bcα | 2.84±0.23 aα | 2.20±0.04 aα | 1.90±0.05 aα | 0.17±0.01 cdα | 8.05±0.88 cα | 0.83±0.06 aα | 0.69±0.06 aα | 11.23±0.76 aα | |
F | N0 | 17.52±1.05 bβ | 17.21±1.24 abcα | 1.17±0.03 dβ | 1.25±0.05 cdα | 1.31±0.19 cα | 0.22±0.03 aα | 23.07±1.79 aα | 0.92±0.02 aα | 0.64±0.04 aα | 6.01±1.35 bα |
N55 | 28.91±0.68 aα | 18.15±1.67 abβ | 1.64±0.05 cdα | 1.45±0.13 cα | 1.59±0.08 bcα | 0.18±0.01 aα | 15.77±1.08 bα | 0.90±0.05 aα | 0.76±0.03 aα | 7.69±0.53 abα | |
N70 | 30.24±2.25 aα | 18.63±2.34 aα | 1.78±0.06 cβ | 2.17±0.09 abα | 1.82±0.06 abα | 0.17±0.06 aα | 15.18±0.47 bα | 0.84±0.05 aα | 0.69±0.07 aα | 11.41±1.00 aα | |
N85 | 21.39±1.18 bα | 13.78±0.60 cα | 2.26±0.11 bα | 2.28±0.14 abα | 1.95±0.04 aα | 0.23±0.03 aα | 9.93±1.41 cα | 0.87±0.04 aα | 0.75±0.10 aα | 7.62±0.61 abα | |
N100 | 20.09±4.43 bα | 15.10±2.85 bcα | 2.61±0.05 aα | 2.33±0.18 aα | 1.83±0.09 abα | 0.19±0.07 aα | 9.44±0.95 cα | 0.84±0.01 aα | 0.68±0.08 aα | 11.20±0.83 aα | |
FG | 0.00 | 0.08 | 9.07* | 0.44 | 3.23 | 0.78 | 6.61* | 48.55** | 0.17 | 0.13 | |
FN | 16.89** | 16.82** | 19.05** | 4.36* | 1.33 | 6.37* | 9.99** | 50.59** | 1.65 | 5.09* | |
FG×N | 10.15** | 5.59* | 2.29 | 0.50 | 4.22* | 0.75 | 1.43 | 24.41** | 0.61 | 2.98* |
1 | 吴兴富,焦芳婵,陈学军,等.清香型烟叶产区基因型选择[J].中国烟草学报,2019,25(2):29-39. |
WU X F, JIAO F C, CHEN X J, et al.. Genotype selection in fresh-flavor tobacco growing areas [J]. Acta Tabacaria Sin., 2019, 25(2):29-39. | |
2 | 邓小华,黄杰,杨丽丽,等.石灰、绿肥和生物有机肥协同改良酸性土壤并提高烟草生产效益[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(9):1577-1587. |
DENG X H, HUANG J, YANG L L, et al.. The synergistic effect of lime, green manure and bio-organic fertilizer on restoration of acid field and improvement of tobacco production efficiency [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2019, 25(9):1577-1587. | |
3 | 周艳飞,聂江文,王幼娟,等.施氮水平对稻-稻-紫云英稻田土壤细菌数量及群落结构的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2018,35(6):508-517. |
ZHOU Y F, NIE J W, WANG Y J, et al.. Effect of nitrogen application level on abundance and community structure of paddy soil bacteria under rice-rice-Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) cropping system [J]. J. Agric. Resour. Environ., 2018,35(6):508-517. | |
4 | 牛桂言,邵惠芳,朱金峰,等.我国植烟土壤修复的研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报,2017,19(3):115-122. |
NIU G Y, SHAO H F, ZHU J F, et al.. Research progress on tobacco planting soil restoration in China [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2017, 19(3):115-122. | |
5 | 高嵩涓,周国朋,曹卫东.南方稻田紫云英作冬绿肥的增产节肥效应与机制[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2020,26(12):2115-2126. |
GAO S J, ZHOU G P, CAO W D. Effects of milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) as winter green manure on rice yield and rate of fertilizer application in rice paddies in south China [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2020, 26(12):2115-2126. | |
6 | 李集勤,黄振瑞,杨少海,等.八种绿肥对土壤营养和烤烟产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2020,41(6): 24-29. |
LI J Q, HUANG Z R, YANG S H, et al.. Effects of eight kinds of green manure on soil nutrition, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Chin. Tobacco Sci., 2020, 41(6):24-29. | |
7 | 祖韦军,潘文杰,张金召,等.耕作深度与翻压绿肥对植烟土壤微生物功能多样性及酶活性的影响[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(10):2383-2393. |
ZU W J, PAN W J, ZHANG J Z, et al.. Effects of different tillage depths and green manures ploughing on the microbial functional diversity and enzyme activities of tobacco soil [J]. J. South Agric., 2020, 51(10):2383-2393. | |
8 | 芦海灵,常栋,张翔,等.绿肥翻压配施生物炭对烤烟连作土壤理化性质及其产质量的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2020,48(10):28-33. |
LU H L, CHANG D, ZHANG X, et al.. Effects of combined application of green manure and biochar on yield and quality of tobacco and soil physico-chemical properties in continuous cropping flue-cured tobacco field [J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2020, 48(10):28-33. | |
9 | 祖韦军,潘文杰,林叶春.耕作深度与翻压绿肥对植烟土壤团聚体及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2020,39(3):1-10. |
ZU W J, PAN W J, LIN Y C, et al.. Effects of green manures by different tillage depths on soil aggregates,quality of tobacco leaves,yields of flue -cured tobacco [J]. J. Mountain Agric. Biol., 2020, 39(3):1-10. | |
10 | 黄平娜,秦道珠,龙怀玉,等.绿肥-烟-稻轮作与烟叶产量品质及后茬晚稻产量效应[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(1):103-108. |
HUANG P N, QIN D Z, LONG H Y, et al.. Effects of green manure-tobacco-paddy rice crop rotation to leaf tobacco yield quality and latter-stubble late rice yield [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci., 2010, 26(1):103-108. | |
11 | 吴永成,李梦颖,杨云飞,等.光叶紫花苕生物固氮能力及其还田氮素对玉米的当季有效性[J].华北农学报,2019,34():183-189. |
WU Y C, LI M Y, YANG Y F, et al.. Biological nitrogen fixation of vetch and the availability of vetch incorporation n to maize as successive crop [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2019, 34(S1):183-189. | |
12 | 陈义强,刘国顺,习红昂,等.烟草栽培中土壤适宜含水率及施肥模型[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(2):42-49. |
CHEN Y Q, LIU G S, XI H A, et al.. Favorable soil moisture and fertilization model for tobacco cultivation [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2009, 25(2):42-49. | |
13 | 崔权仁,姜超强,武文明,等.皖南烟区硫肥适宜用量及其对烤烟品质的影响研究 [J].中国农学通报,2019,35(26):40-46. |
CUI Q R, JIANG C Q, WU W M, et al.. Optimum sulphur rate and its impact on flue-cured tobacco quality in southern Anhui [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci., 2010, 26(1):40-46. | |
14 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品 氯含量的测定电位滴定法: [S] .北京:中国标准出版社,2001. |
15 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品 水溶性糖的测定连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002. |
16 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品 总氮的测定连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002. |
17 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品 总植物碱的测定连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002. |
18 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品 钾的测定连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007. |
19 | 贺国强,王盼盼,高远,等.寒地绿肥与烤烟套种对烤烟生长及经济性状的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2020,36(7):37-43. |
HE G Q, WANG P P, GAO Y, et al.. Tobacco and green manure interplanting in cold region: effect on growth and economic characteristics of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci., 2020, 36(7):37-43. | |
20 | 储刘专,黄树立,孔伟,等.绿肥翻压利用对干旱年份烤烟生长发育的促进作用[J].华中农业大学学报,2011,30(3):337-341. |
CHU L Z, HUANG S L, KONG W, et al.. Promotive effect of green manure application on growth and development of flue-cured tobacco in dry year [J]. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ., 2011, 30(3):337-341. | |
21 | 邹正.绿肥翻压对烟草生长、产质量和养分吸收利用的影响[D].成都:四川农业大学,2013. |
ZOU Z. Effect of green manure application on tobacco growth, yield and quality and nutrient absorption and utilization [D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2013. | |
22 | 刘建香,曹卫东,郭云周,等.红壤翻压绿肥对烟草农艺性状及线虫危害的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2015,258(4):123-127, 130. |
LIU J X, CAO W D, GUO Y Z, et al.. Effect of green manure application on agronomic characters and nematodes harm of tobacco in red soil [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2015, 258(4):123-127, 130. | |
23 | 郭云周,尹小怀,王劲松,等.翻压等量绿肥和化肥减量对红壤旱地烤烟产量产值的影响[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,25(6):811-816. |
GUO Y Z, YIN X H, WANG J S, et al.. Effects of equal quantity green manure application and different fertilizer rates on yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco in red soil of upland in Yunnan [J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2010, 25(6):811-816. | |
24 | 寇玲玲.光叶紫花苕子种植技术及其与化肥配施对烟草养分吸收和碳氮代谢的影响[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2011. |
KOU L L. Study on the plantingtechnique of smooth vetch and effeetof combining application of green manure and chemical fertilizer on nutritient uptake,carbon and nitrogen metablism of tobacco [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011. | |
25 | 滕少娜.黑麦草种植对烟田土壤微生物群落结构的影响[D].重庆:西南大学,2010. |
TEN S N. Effect of lolium multifolrum application on community of tobacco soil microorganism [D]. Chongqin: Southwest University, 2010. | |
26 | 郭云周,尹小怀,雷素芬,等.等氮条件下烟草化肥绿肥合理配施初探[J].西南农业学报,2010,23(6):1930-1934. |
GUO Y Z, YIN X H, LEI S F, et al.. Effects of combining application of fresh vetch straw and chemical nitrogen fertilizer on tobacco under equal nitrogen rates [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2010, 23(6):1930-1934. | |
27 | 刘高峰.有机营养对烤烟生理代谢与品质影响的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2006. |
LIU G F. Studies on the effects of organic nutrients on metabolism,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2006. | |
28 | 聂天宏,韩学博,王海龙,等.不同种类生物质炭对植烟土壤保育及烤烟生长和品质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):346-351, 358. |
NIE T H, HAN X B, WANG H L, et al.. Effect of different biochars on soil conservation, growth and quality of the flue-cured tobacco [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2018, 32(6):346-351, 358. | |
29 | 姜桂英,张弘,张玉军,等.烟草农艺性状和烟叶化学成分对不同碳氮比有机物料的响应[J].干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(4):61-66, 136. |
JIANG G Y, ZHANG H, ZHANG Y J, et al.. The response of the agronomical traits and chemical components of tobacco to organic materials with varied carbon/nitrogen ratios [J]. Agric.Res. Arid Areas, 2017, 35(4):61-66, 136. | |
30 | 彭琳.湘西烟区种植绿肥对植烟土壤和烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2015. |
PENG L. Effect of plant green manure on tobacco-planting soil and growth, development, field and quality of tobacco in Xiangxi [D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2015. | |
31 | 王飞.翻压不同冬闲绿肥对植烟土壤特性及烤烟产质量的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2018. |
WANG F. The effect of burying different winter green manure on the character of planting tobacco soil and the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2018. | |
32 | 罗贞宝.绿肥对烟田土壤的改良作用及对烟叶品质的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2006. |
LUO Z B. Effect of green manure application on soil improvement of tobacco field and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2006. | |
33 | 刘霞.绿肥和菌肥对玉米茬土壤性状及烟叶品质的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2008. |
LIU X. Effect of green manure and microblal fertilizer on maize stubble soil characteristics and quality of flue-cured tobacco [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2008. | |
34 | 郭飞.大麦掩青对烤烟品质影响的研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2004. |
GUO F. Research on effects of barley incorporation on the quality of flue-cured tobacco [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2004. | |
35 | 王允白,王宝华,计玉,等.山东沂水植烟土壤类型与烟叶品质关系的调查研究[J].中国烟草科学,2000(2):13-17. |
WANG Y B, WANG B H, JI Y, et al.. Investigation on relationnship between soil types and tobacco leaf quality in Shandong [J]. Chin. Tobacco Sci., 2000(2):13-17. | |
36 | 叶协锋,杨超,李正,等.绿肥对植烟土壤酶活性及土壤肥力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(2):445-454. |
YE X F, YANG C, LI Z, et al.. Effects of green manure in corporation on soil enzyme activities and fertility in tobacco-planting soils [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2013, 19(2):445-454. | |
37 | 刘胜良,赵正雄,陈月舞,等.绿肥全部还田条件下烤烟化肥氮用量调整研究[J].中国烟草学报,2010,16(3):57-60, 63. |
LIU S L, ZHAO Z X, CHEN Y W, et al.. Adjustment of N fertilization rate in flue-cured tobacco production when applying green manure [J]. Acta Tabacaria Sin., 2010, 16(3):57-60, 63. |
[1] | Yanjun KE, Yumeng ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Zitao ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Combined with Subsoiling on Farmland Soil Fertility and Crop Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 157-166. |
[2] | Zhengran SUN, Cuiping ZHANG, Jinli ZHANG, Hao WU, Xiuyan LIU, Zhenkai WANG, Yuzhen YANG, Daohua HE. Effects of Chemical Detopping on Cotton Plant Growth in Guanzhong Cotton Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 167-177. |
[3] | Yunfei LIU, Fengjie WEI, Maolin XIA, Zhaojin YU, Hao XIA, Chunyu YI, Jianbo CHANG, Xiaoming JI. Alleviative Effect of New Composite Hydrogels on Cadmium Stress Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 188-197. |
[4] | Ling YANG, Fucang ZHANG, Xin SUN, Shaohui ZHANG, Haidong WANG, Ahmed Elsayed ABDELGHANY, Zhanfei CHEN, Yuchuan FANG. Effects of Biochar and Drip Irrigation Amounts on Soil Properties and Growth of Potato in Blown-sand Region of Northern Yulin, Shaanxi Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 221-233. |
[5] | Nali XU, Huixia YU, Mingming YAO, Yanqing WANG, Qingfeng LI, Caixia LIU, Gang SUN, Jiajing CHEN, Jiaohui LONG, Zhangjun WANG. Analysis of Genetic Diversity Based on SSR and SRAP Markers and Agronomic Traits of Wheat Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 30-46. |
[6] | Zengqiang ZHAO, Guoli ZHANG, Panpan MA, Youzhong LI, Zhijun WANG, Zongming XIE, Guoqing SUN. Role of Receptor-like Cytoplasmic Kinase Gene GbRLCK10 from Gossypium barbadense in Disease Resistance [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 57-65. |
[7] | Yunzhu ZHENG, Shuchen SUN. Effects of Straw Biochar and Straw on Soil Nutrients and Crop Yield in Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 152-162. |
[8] | Qiaoyi HUANG, Yongpei WU, Xu HUANG, Ping LI, Hongting FU, Mu ZHANG, Yuwan PANG, Zhaobing ZENG, Shuanhu TANG. Impact of Controlled-release Urea Combined with Conventional Urea on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Spring Sweet Corn Under One-off Application [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 163-173. |
[9] | Yudan ZHANG, Weimin WANG, Bo NI, Xiaohan MA, Junling LI, Zicheng XU, Wei JIA, Jiuchang SHI. Extraction Optimization of Chlorogenic Acid from Tobacco Stalk and Its Antifungal Effect [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 119-127. |
[10] | Weixin DONG, Dongxiao LI, Yuechen ZHANG. Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Physiological Parameters, Yield and Quality of Maize [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 142-152. |
[11] | Geng LI, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Yuyuan CHENG, Jiang WU, Weidong DUAN, Guangting YIN, Qian LI, Chen CHEN, Fei ZHENG, Yuan LIU, Hongzhi SHI. Effects of Different Organic-inorganic Nitrogen Ratios on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen and Upper Leaf Quality in Nanyang Tobacco Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 175-186. |
[12] | Kaihong XIANG, Xu LYU, Chuanhai SHU, Riqu WUZA, Jinyue ZHANG, Yuemei ZHU, Zhiyuan YANG, Yongjian SUN, Jun MA. Effects of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Precision Hill-direct-seeding Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 149-165. |
[13] | Hongtao XIANG, Wan LI, Ning HE, Qiang WANG, Lingling ZENG, Manli WANG, Chunjie YANG, Yanjiang FENG. Physiological Response and Effect of S3307 on Water Stress of Adzuki Bean Root [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 39-49. |
[14] | Yuanwei CHEN, Huabin ZHENG, Weiqin WANG, Na KUANG, Youyi LUO, Dan ZOU, Qiyuan TANG. Effect of Mowing Treatment on the Main Season Whole Plant Biomass and Silage Quality and Yield in Regeneration Season of Ratooning Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 161-171. |
[15] | Quanquan WEI, Ying GAO, Jiulan GOU, Meng ZHANG, Yong RAO, Bin YANG, Di FAN, Wenhao FENG, Huagui XIAO. Effects of Different Sowing Rates and Sowing Methods on the Nutrient Absorption, Utilization and Yield of Winter Rapeseed in Yellow Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 182-191. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||