Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 163-173.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0760
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Qiaoyi HUANG1(), Yongpei WU1, Xu HUANG1, Ping LI1, Hongting FU1, Mu ZHANG1, Yuwan PANG1, Zhaobing ZENG2(
), Shuanhu TANG1(
)
Received:
2021-09-01
Accepted:
2021-11-23
Online:
2023-02-15
Published:
2023-05-17
Contact:
Zhaobing ZENG,Shuanhu TANG
黄巧义1(), 吴永沛1, 黄旭1, 李苹1, 付弘婷1, 张木1, 逄玉万1, 曾招兵2(
), 唐拴虎1(
)
通讯作者:
曾招兵,唐拴虎
作者简介:
黄巧义 E-mail:huangqiaoyi@gdaas.cn
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Qiaoyi HUANG, Yongpei WU, Xu HUANG, Ping LI, Hongting FU, Mu ZHANG, Yuwan PANG, Zhaobing ZENG, Shuanhu TANG. Impact of Controlled-release Urea Combined with Conventional Urea on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Spring Sweet Corn Under One-off Application[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 163-173.
黄巧义, 吴永沛, 黄旭, 李苹, 付弘婷, 张木, 逄玉万, 曾招兵, 唐拴虎. 控释尿素与尿素配施对甜玉米产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(2): 163-173.
地点 Site | 土壤质地 Texture | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g∙kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali N/ (mg∙kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P/ (mg∙kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/ (mg∙kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
博罗Boluo | 壤土Loam | 5.16 | 22.3 | 88.54 | 52.50 | 134.00 |
惠阳Huiyang | 砂壤土 Sandy loam | 5.25 | 24.3 | 135.08 | 45.65 | 127.50 |
Table 1 Soil properties of the experimental sites
地点 Site | 土壤质地 Texture | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g∙kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali N/ (mg∙kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P/ (mg∙kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/ (mg∙kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
博罗Boluo | 壤土Loam | 5.16 | 22.3 | 88.54 | 52.50 | 134.00 |
惠阳Huiyang | 砂壤土 Sandy loam | 5.25 | 24.3 | 135.08 | 45.65 | 127.50 |
试验点 Site | 处理 Treatment | 穗长 Ear length/cm | 穗粗 Ear diameter/ mm | 不秃尖率 Tip fill/% | 行粒数 Kernel No. per row | 产量 Yield/(kg∙hm-2) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content/ (mg∙kg-1) | 维生素C含量 Vc content/ (mg∙kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
博罗 Boluo | CK | 19.1±0.7 b | 44.9±2.4 b | 80.7±3.3 b | 32.8±1.8 b | 10 605.00±457.93 b | 137.72±6.21 a | 105.59±1.61 b |
U100 | 20.6±0.5 a | 53.7±0.7 a | 95.4±1.3 a | 40.2±0.6 a | 18 510.00±337.09 a | 106.81±8.21 b | 115.71±2.40 a | |
CCU100 | 20.4±0.3 a | 53.4±1.1 a | 94.9±2.2 a | 40.2±0.6 a | 18 600.00±333.86 a | 106.08±6.35 b | 117.24±1.67 a | |
CCU80 | 20.3±0.1 a | 53.4±0.6 a | 94.7±0.5 a | 40.1±0.9 a | 17 826.90±215.50 a | 108.14±7.19 b | 117.14±6.88 a | |
惠阳 Huiyang | CK | 18.7±0.2 b | 43.0±1.7 b | 81.1±3.4 b | 39.4±0.9 b | 12 731.57±703.04 b | 106.07±9.41 a | 136.16±4.80 b |
U100 | 19.4±0.5 a | 48.4±1.6 a | 96.2±1.0 a | 42.3±0.5 a | 19 629.94±176.56 a | 93.06±8.43 a | 148.51±5.41 a | |
CCU100 | 19.3±0.3 a | 48.3±1.0 a | 96.3±0.8 a | 42.3±1.4 a | 19 766.44±104.21 a | 95.08±8.03 a | 152.94±1.49 a | |
CCU80 | 19.3±0.2 a | 47.7±0.5 a | 96.0±1.2 a | 41.2±1.0 a | 18 811.15±421.54 a | 97.25±6.87 a | 150.53±3.91 a |
Table 2 Yield and quality of sweet corn under different treatments
试验点 Site | 处理 Treatment | 穗长 Ear length/cm | 穗粗 Ear diameter/ mm | 不秃尖率 Tip fill/% | 行粒数 Kernel No. per row | 产量 Yield/(kg∙hm-2) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content/ (mg∙kg-1) | 维生素C含量 Vc content/ (mg∙kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
博罗 Boluo | CK | 19.1±0.7 b | 44.9±2.4 b | 80.7±3.3 b | 32.8±1.8 b | 10 605.00±457.93 b | 137.72±6.21 a | 105.59±1.61 b |
U100 | 20.6±0.5 a | 53.7±0.7 a | 95.4±1.3 a | 40.2±0.6 a | 18 510.00±337.09 a | 106.81±8.21 b | 115.71±2.40 a | |
CCU100 | 20.4±0.3 a | 53.4±1.1 a | 94.9±2.2 a | 40.2±0.6 a | 18 600.00±333.86 a | 106.08±6.35 b | 117.24±1.67 a | |
CCU80 | 20.3±0.1 a | 53.4±0.6 a | 94.7±0.5 a | 40.1±0.9 a | 17 826.90±215.50 a | 108.14±7.19 b | 117.14±6.88 a | |
惠阳 Huiyang | CK | 18.7±0.2 b | 43.0±1.7 b | 81.1±3.4 b | 39.4±0.9 b | 12 731.57±703.04 b | 106.07±9.41 a | 136.16±4.80 b |
U100 | 19.4±0.5 a | 48.4±1.6 a | 96.2±1.0 a | 42.3±0.5 a | 19 629.94±176.56 a | 93.06±8.43 a | 148.51±5.41 a | |
CCU100 | 19.3±0.3 a | 48.3±1.0 a | 96.3±0.8 a | 42.3±1.4 a | 19 766.44±104.21 a | 95.08±8.03 a | 152.94±1.49 a | |
CCU80 | 19.3±0.2 a | 47.7±0.5 a | 96.0±1.2 a | 41.2±1.0 a | 18 811.15±421.54 a | 97.25±6.87 a | 150.53±3.91 a |
Fig. 3 Dry matter accumulation of sweet corn in different fertilizing treatmentsNote:* and *** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.001 levels, respetively.
Fig. 4 Dynamics of nitrogen accumulation in sweet corn plants in different fertilizing treatmentsNote:* and *** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.001 levels, respetively.
试验点 Site | 处理 Treatment | 氮含量 N content/% | 磷含量 P content/% | 钾含量 K content/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
秸秆Straw | 果穗 Grain | 秸秆Straw | 果穗 Grain | 秸秆Straw | 果穗 Grain | ||
博罗 Boluo | CK | 0.86±0.05 b | 1.08±0.05 b | 0.23±0.04 a | 0.31±0.01 a | 2.16±0.13 a | 0.93±0.07 a |
U100 | 1.61±0.18 a | 1.41±0.18 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 0.30±0.01 a | 2.31±0.16 a | 0.92±0.02 a | |
CCU100 | 1.79±0.11 a | 1.47±0.10 a | 0.24±0.02 a | 0.30±0.01 a | 2.24±0.12 a | 0.93±0.02 a | |
CCU80 | 1.51±0.16 a | 1.34±0.08 a | 0.23±0.03 a | 0.29±0.02 a | 2.38±0.22 a | 0.95±0.03 a | |
惠阳 Huiyang | CK | 1.52±0.23 b | 1.49±0.15 b | 0.34±0.06 a | 0.34±0.02 a | 2.98±0.22 a | 0.89±0.06 a |
U100 | 1.88±0.23 ab | 1.76±0.10 ab | 0.37±0.03 a | 0.34±0.04 a | 2.99±0.21 a | 0.97±0.12 a | |
CCU100 | 2.22±0.25 a | 1.89±0.21 a | 0.42±0.02 a | 0.35±0.04 a | 2.88±0.21 a | 0.95±0.07 a | |
CCU80 | 2.04±0.34 ab | 1.82±0.15 ab | 0.41±0.06 a | 0.34±0.02 a | 3.14±0.43 a | 0.96±0.12 a |
Table 3 Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content of sweet corn at harvest in different fertilizing treatments
试验点 Site | 处理 Treatment | 氮含量 N content/% | 磷含量 P content/% | 钾含量 K content/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
秸秆Straw | 果穗 Grain | 秸秆Straw | 果穗 Grain | 秸秆Straw | 果穗 Grain | ||
博罗 Boluo | CK | 0.86±0.05 b | 1.08±0.05 b | 0.23±0.04 a | 0.31±0.01 a | 2.16±0.13 a | 0.93±0.07 a |
U100 | 1.61±0.18 a | 1.41±0.18 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 0.30±0.01 a | 2.31±0.16 a | 0.92±0.02 a | |
CCU100 | 1.79±0.11 a | 1.47±0.10 a | 0.24±0.02 a | 0.30±0.01 a | 2.24±0.12 a | 0.93±0.02 a | |
CCU80 | 1.51±0.16 a | 1.34±0.08 a | 0.23±0.03 a | 0.29±0.02 a | 2.38±0.22 a | 0.95±0.03 a | |
惠阳 Huiyang | CK | 1.52±0.23 b | 1.49±0.15 b | 0.34±0.06 a | 0.34±0.02 a | 2.98±0.22 a | 0.89±0.06 a |
U100 | 1.88±0.23 ab | 1.76±0.10 ab | 0.37±0.03 a | 0.34±0.04 a | 2.99±0.21 a | 0.97±0.12 a | |
CCU100 | 2.22±0.25 a | 1.89±0.21 a | 0.42±0.02 a | 0.35±0.04 a | 2.88±0.21 a | 0.95±0.07 a | |
CCU80 | 2.04±0.34 ab | 1.82±0.15 ab | 0.41±0.06 a | 0.34±0.02 a | 3.14±0.43 a | 0.96±0.12 a |
试验点 Site | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥农学效率 Nitrogen agronomic efficiency/(kg∙kg-1) | 氮肥吸收利用率 Nitrogen recovery efficiency/% | 氮肥生理利用率 Nitrogen physiological efficiency/(kg∙kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
博罗 Boluo | CK | — | — | — |
U100 | 26.35±1.26 b | 39.15±3.50 a | 67.55±5.67 a | |
CCU100 | 26.65±1.12 b | 40.32±5.19 a | 65.47±8.35 a | |
CCU80 | 30.09±0.90 a | 41.08±2.09 a | 73.76±2.00 a | |
惠阳 Huiyang | CK | — | — | — |
U100 | 22.99±0.59 b | 28.77±1.34 b | 79.70±3.89 a | |
CCU100 | 23.45±0.35 b | 32.02±1.59 ab | 74.25±10.61 a | |
CCU80 | 25.33±0.52 a | 35.11±1.48 a | 70.82±7.57 a |
Table 4 Nitrogen use efficiencies of sweet corn in different fertilizing treatments
试验点 Site | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥农学效率 Nitrogen agronomic efficiency/(kg∙kg-1) | 氮肥吸收利用率 Nitrogen recovery efficiency/% | 氮肥生理利用率 Nitrogen physiological efficiency/(kg∙kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
博罗 Boluo | CK | — | — | — |
U100 | 26.35±1.26 b | 39.15±3.50 a | 67.55±5.67 a | |
CCU100 | 26.65±1.12 b | 40.32±5.19 a | 65.47±8.35 a | |
CCU80 | 30.09±0.90 a | 41.08±2.09 a | 73.76±2.00 a | |
惠阳 Huiyang | CK | — | — | — |
U100 | 22.99±0.59 b | 28.77±1.34 b | 79.70±3.89 a | |
CCU100 | 23.45±0.35 b | 32.02±1.59 ab | 74.25±10.61 a | |
CCU80 | 25.33±0.52 a | 35.11±1.48 a | 70.82±7.57 a |
试验点 Site | 处理 Treatment | 氮含量N content | 磷含量P content | 钾含量K content |
---|---|---|---|---|
博罗 Boluo | CK | 77.55±3.31 b | 46.85±3.78 a | 139.33±14.18 a |
U100 | 97.35±5.70 a | 48.03±4.64 a | 130.50±15.46 a | |
CCU100 | 95.57±4.33 a | 42.90±3.14 a | 125.65±14.31 a | |
CCU80 | 94.07±9.67 a | 49.22±4.71 a | 137.17±19.23 a | |
惠阳 Huiyang | CK | 123.09±10.10 a | 49.99±4.41 a | 118.50±8.81 a |
U100 | 130.83±7.55 a | 48.14±7.24 a | 135.50±28.33 a | |
CCU100 | 137.35±9.66 a | 48.29±8.13 a | 121.25±15.22 a | |
CCU80 | 131.19±7.43 a | 43.32±2.02 a | 125.50±9.67 a |
Table 5 Soil available N, P, K content after rice harvest in different fertilizer treatments
试验点 Site | 处理 Treatment | 氮含量N content | 磷含量P content | 钾含量K content |
---|---|---|---|---|
博罗 Boluo | CK | 77.55±3.31 b | 46.85±3.78 a | 139.33±14.18 a |
U100 | 97.35±5.70 a | 48.03±4.64 a | 130.50±15.46 a | |
CCU100 | 95.57±4.33 a | 42.90±3.14 a | 125.65±14.31 a | |
CCU80 | 94.07±9.67 a | 49.22±4.71 a | 137.17±19.23 a | |
惠阳 Huiyang | CK | 123.09±10.10 a | 49.99±4.41 a | 118.50±8.81 a |
U100 | 130.83±7.55 a | 48.14±7.24 a | 135.50±28.33 a | |
CCU100 | 137.35±9.66 a | 48.29±8.13 a | 121.25±15.22 a | |
CCU80 | 131.19±7.43 a | 43.32±2.02 a | 125.50±9.67 a |
1 | 刘蔚楠,万忠,甘阳英,等.2015年广东甜玉米产业发展形势与对策建议[J].广东农业科学,2016,43(3):12-16. |
LIU W N, WAN Z, GAN Y Y, et al.. Development situation and countermeasures of Guangdong sweet corn industry in 2015 [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2016, 43(3):12-16. | |
2 | 郭秋萍,梁善,阚玉景,等.减量施肥条件下甜玉米产量效应与农田氮、磷流失特征[J].中国农学通报,2021,37(9):71-78. |
GUO Q P, LIANG S, KAN Y J, et al.. Yield effect of sweet corn and characteristics of farmland nitrogen and phosphorus runoff losses under reduced fertilizer rate [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2021,37(9):71-78. | |
3 | 张白鸽,李强,陈琼贤,等.广东甜玉米施肥指标体系研究[J].广东农业科学,2013,40(20):67-70. |
ZHANG B G, LI Q, CHEN Q X, et al.. Research on index system for sweet corn fertilization in Guangdong [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2013, 40(20):67-70. | |
4 | 黄巧义,唐拴虎,张发宝,等.控释尿素与常规尿素配施比例对甜玉米产量和氮肥利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017, 23(3): 622-631. |
HAUNG Q Y, TANG S H, ZHANG F B, et al.. Effect of the blending ratio of controlled-release urea and conventional urea on yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of sweet corn [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2017, 23(3): 622-631. | |
5 | 安文博,孙焱鑫,李占台,等.不同缓控释肥对鲜食玉米产量、品质及氨挥发的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(7):2422-2430. |
AN W B, SUN Y X, LI Z T, et al.. Effects of different slow/controlled release fertilizers on yield, quality of fresh maize and ammonia emissions [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2020, 31(7): 2422-2430. | |
6 | 岳艳军,吴跃进,杨阳,等.含2.5%基质材料尿素的氮缓释特性及其与作物生长吻合性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(11): 2009-2018. |
YUE Y J, WU Y J, YANG Y, et al.. Slow-release property of urea containing 2.5% additives and the fitness of nutrient supply with crop growth [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2019, 25(11): 2009-2018. | |
7 | 张玉凤,沈玉文,王江涛,等.硫磺树脂包膜尿素氮素释放与小麦、玉米需氮规律的匹配性及最佳配施比例[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(2): 245-255. |
ZHANG Y F, SHEN Y W, WANG J T, et al.. The fitness of nitrogen release of sulphur resin coated urea with wheat and maize growth and the optimal proportion in total fertilizer application [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2020, 26(2): 245-255. | |
8 | 关瑞,张民,诸葛玉平,等.控释氮肥一次性基施提高谷子产量和氮素利用率[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(4):639-646. |
GUAN R, ZHANG M, ZHUGE Y P, et al.. Single basal application of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer improve yield and nitrogen use efficiency of foxtail millet [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2019, 25(4): 639-646. | |
9 | 曹兵,黄志浩,吴广利,等.控释掺混肥一次性减量施用对夏玉米产量、氮肥利用和叶片氮代谢酶活性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021 (3): 127-133. |
CAO B, HUANG Z H, WU G L, et al.. Impact of controlled release blended fertilizer on yield,nitrogen use efficiency and leaf enzyme activity of nitrogen metabolism of summer maize under single basal reduction application [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. Chin., 2021 (3): 127-133. | |
10 | 杨金宇,李援农,王凯瑜,等.控释氮肥与普通尿素配施比例和方法对冬小麦灌浆特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(3):442-452. |
YANG J Y, LI Y N, WANG K Y, et al.. Effects of blending ratio and application method of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer and common urea on grain-filling properties of winter wheat [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2020, 26(3): 442-452. | |
11 | 衣文平,史桂芳,武良,等.不同释放期包膜控释尿素与普通尿素配施在夏玉米上的应用效果研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(4):931-937. |
YI W P, SHI G F, WU L, et al.. Applications of polymer coated urea with different release time and conventional urea on summer maize growth [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2010, 16(4):931-937. | |
12 | 肖强,李鸿雁,衣文平,等.控释与稳定尿素配施对土壤氮素迁移及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2020,28(10):1591-1599. |
XIAO Q, LI H Y, YI W P, et al.. Effects of controlled-release and stable urea application on soil nitrogen transport and yields of winter wheat and summer maize [J]. Chin. J. Ecol. Agric., 2020, 28(10):1591-1599. | |
13 | 冯朋博,康建宏,梁熠,等.普通尿素与控释尿素配施比例和方法对土壤氮素供应和春玉米产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(4):692-704. |
FENG P B, KANG J H, LIANG Y, et al.. Effects of combination ratio and application method of conventional urea and controlled release urea on soil nitrogen supply and spring maize yield [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2020, 26(4): 692-704. | |
14 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:1-495. |
15 | 郭家萌,何灵芝,闫东良,等.控释氮肥和尿素配比对不同品种夏玉米氮素累积、转移及其利用效率的影响[J].草业学报,2021,30(1): 81-95. |
GUO J M, HE L Z, YAN D L, et al.. Effects of controlled release nitrogen and urea ratio on nitrogen accumulation,transfer,and nitro-gen-use efficiency of different summer maize varieties [J]. Acta Pratac. Sin., 2021, 30(1): 81-95. | |
16 | 杨锌,吴良欢,伍少福,等.树脂包膜尿素在稻田中的释放特征及与积温的关系[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(2):199-204. |
YANG X, WU L H, WU S F, et al.. Nitrogen release characteristic of polymer coated urea in paddy soil and its relationship with cumulative temperature [J]. Trans. Chin. Agric. Eng., 2016, 32(2): 199-204. | |
17 | HUANG Q Y, FAN X L, TANG S H, et al.. Seasonal differences in N release dynamic of controlled-released urea in paddy field and its impact on the growth of rice under double rice cropping system [J/OL]. Soil Till. Res., 2019, 195: 104371 [2021-08-31].. |
18 | 张玉玲,张玉龙,党秀丽,等.包膜尿素氮素的溶出特性研究[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(5):1383-1389. |
ZHANG Y L, ZHANG Y L, DANG X L, et al.. Study of the characteristics of nitrogen solubility from coated urea [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2008, 41(5):1383-1389. | |
19 | TIAN X F, LI C L, ZHANG M, et al.. Controlled release urea improved crop yields and mitigated nitrate leaching under cotton-garlic intercropping system in a 4-year field trial [J]. Soil Till. Res., 2018, 175:157-167. |
20 | 陈建生,徐培智,唐拴虎,等.施肥对甜玉米物质形成累积特征影响研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(1):58-64. |
CHEN J S, XU P Z, TANG S H, et al.. Effects of fertilization on cumulating characteristics of dried matter mass of sweet corn [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2010, 16(1): 58-64. | |
21 | 陈建生,徐培智,唐拴虎,等.秋播甜玉米的物质形成累积特征及施肥措施对其影响研究[J].广东农业科学,2008(6):3-6. |
CHEN J S, XU P Z, TANG S H, et al.. Characteristics of dried matter mass cumulating and as affected by fertilization for fall-sowing sweet corn [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2008(6):3-6. | |
22 | IRFAN S A, RAZALI R, KUSHAARI K, et al.. A review of mathematical modeling and simulation of controlled-release fertilizers [J]. J. Control. Release, 2018, 271:45-54. |
23 | YANG Y C, ZHANG M, LI Y, et al.. Controlled release urea improved nitrogen use efficiency, activities of leaf enzymes, and rice yield [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2012, 76: 2307-2317. |
24 | GAO X, LI C L, ZHANG M, et al.. Controlled release urea improved the nitrogen use efficiency, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) on silt loamy soil [J]. Field Crops Res., 2015, 181:60-68. |
25 | 冯小杰,战秀梅,王雪鑫,等.包膜尿素不同配比减施对土壤无机氮含量及玉米氮素吸收的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(10): 1733-1745. |
FENG X J, ZHAN X M, WANG X X, et al.. Effects of soil inorganic nitrogen and nitrogen absorbing by maize under the reduced application of coated urea at different proportions [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2019, 52(10):1733-1745. | |
26 | 王寅,冯国忠,张天山,等.控释氮肥与尿素混施对连作春玉米产量、氮素吸收和氮素平衡的影响[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(3):518-528. |
WANG Y, FENG G Z, ZHANG T S, et al.. Effects of mixed application of controlled-release N fertilizer and common urea on grain yield, N uptake and soil N balance in continuous spring maize production [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2016, 49(3):518-528. | |
27 | 张敬昇,李冰,王昌全,等.控释氮肥与尿素掺混比例对作物中后期土壤供氮能力和稻麦产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017, 23(1): 110-118. |
ZHANG J S, LI B, WANG C Q, et al.. Effects of the blending ratio of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and urea on soil nitrogen supply in the mid-late growing stage and yield of wheat and rice [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2017, 23(1): 110-118. | |
28 | 严田蓉,何艳,唐源,等.缓释尿素与普通尿素配施对直播杂交籼稻叶片生长及产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(5): 729-740. |
YAN T R, HE Y, TANG Y, et al.. Effects of slow-release urea combined with conventional urea on leaf growth and yield formation of indica hybrid rice under direct seeding cultivation [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2019, 25(5): 729-740. | |
29 | 杜思婕,张艺磊,张志勇,等.冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系不同新型尿素的氮素利用率及去向[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(1): 24-34. |
DU S J, ZHANG Y L, ZHANG Z Y, et al.. Nitrogen use efficiency and fate of new urea types in a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2021, 27(1): 24-34. | |
30 | 任宁,汪洋,王改革,等.不同降雨年份控释尿素与普通尿素配施对夏玉米产量、氮素利用及经济效益的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(4): 681-691. |
REN N, WANG Y, WANG G G, et al.. Yield, nitrogen use and economic benefit of summer maize under different ratios of controlled-release and ordinary urea combination in normal and dry rainfall years [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2020, 26(4): 681-691. |
[1] | Yunzhu ZHENG, Shuchen SUN. Effects of Straw Biochar and Straw on Soil Nutrients and Crop Yield in Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 152-162. |
[2] | Weixin DONG, Dongxiao LI, Yuechen ZHANG. Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Physiological Parameters, Yield and Quality of Maize [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 142-152. |
[3] | Kaihong XIANG, Xu LYU, Chuanhai SHU, Riqu WUZA, Jinyue ZHANG, Yuemei ZHU, Zhiyuan YANG, Yongjian SUN, Jun MA. Effects of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Precision Hill-direct-seeding Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 149-165. |
[4] | Hongtao XIANG, Wan LI, Ning HE, Qiang WANG, Lingling ZENG, Manli WANG, Chunjie YANG, Yanjiang FENG. Physiological Response and Effect of S3307 on Water Stress of Adzuki Bean Root [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 39-49. |
[5] | Yuanwei CHEN, Huabin ZHENG, Weiqin WANG, Na KUANG, Youyi LUO, Dan ZOU, Qiyuan TANG. Effect of Mowing Treatment on the Main Season Whole Plant Biomass and Silage Quality and Yield in Regeneration Season of Ratooning Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 161-171. |
[6] | Quanquan WEI, Ying GAO, Jiulan GOU, Meng ZHANG, Yong RAO, Bin YANG, Di FAN, Wenhao FENG, Huagui XIAO. Effects of Different Sowing Rates and Sowing Methods on the Nutrient Absorption, Utilization and Yield of Winter Rapeseed in Yellow Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 182-191. |
[7] | Xuejing LIU, Xiaoyuan BAO, Xiaoyang HOU, Wenchao ZHEN. Dynamics of Soil Water Content and Yield Formation Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Water Limited Irrigation in Spring in Haihe Plain [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 167-176. |
[8] | Zengying PENG, Yingying SHEN, Songjiang DUAN, Yifan WU, Zongrun LI, Rensong GUO, Jusong ZHANG. Effect of Chemical Regulation on Canopy Structure and Yield of Cotton with Different Nitrogen Amounts [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 177-186. |
[9] | Yi DANG, Jianjun ZHANG, Gang ZHAO, Tinglu FAN, Lei WANG, Shangzhong LI, Gang ZHOU. Effects of Mixed Applying of Controlled-release Urea and Conventional Urea on Yield,Water and Nitrogen Utilization of Maize in Dryland [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 156-165. |
[10] | Tongmei GAO, Feng LI, Xiaoyu SU, Dongyong WANG, Yuan TIAN, Pengyu ZHANG, Tongke LI, Zihao YANG, Shuangling WEI. Effect of Nitrogen Reduction on Agronomic Trait, Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Sesame [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 176-188. |
[11] | Chenguang ZHAO, Siyun NIU, Xun CHEN, Li FANG, Haitao LI, Peixing WANG, Binbin SHEN, Yuanzhi SHI. Effects of Compound Fertilizer on Tea Yield, Quality and Fertility of Tea Garden Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 206-217. |
[12] | Yu FENG, Shujin QIU, Xiangyang YUAN, Qingliang CUI, Zhiqiang JI. Research on Compression Mechanical Characteristics of Sorghum Grains [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 102-110. |
[13] | Xin WANG, Yuxia ZHANG, Weidong CHEN, Congying LIN, Wenhui HOU, Guleng SIRI, Baiming CONG. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing on Yield and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Different Forage Oat Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 170-179. |
[14] | Hui LIU, Jiezeng JIANG, Hao ZHANG, Yongxian ZHANG, Jiayu QIAN, Dongsheng LI, Yan LYU, Huanrui WU. Effects of Straw Mulching on Shallow Water Soil on Alleviating Soil Salinization and Growth of Aquatic Vegetables [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 202-208. |
[15] | Yuan YI, Huiyun ZHANG, Liwei LIU, Jing WANG, Xuecheng ZHU, Na ZHAO, Guohua FENG. Effects of Slow-released Fertilizer Compound Humic Acid Instead of Urea on Grain Yield and Population Quality in Xumai New Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 144-153. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||