Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 37-45.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0754
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Dongsheng AN1,2(), Chengming YAN1,2, Yang LIU3, Baoshan ZHAO1, Ran KONG1, Junbo SU1, Zhijun XU2(
)
Received:
2022-09-07
Accepted:
2023-02-13
Online:
2024-04-15
Published:
2024-04-23
Contact:
Zhijun XU
安东升1,2(), 严程明1,2, 刘洋3, 赵宝山1, 孔冉1, 苏俊波1, 徐志军2(
)
通讯作者:
徐志军
作者简介:
安东升E-mail: dongshengan@126.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Dongsheng AN, Chengming YAN, Yang LIU, Baoshan ZHAO, Ran KONG, Junbo SU, Zhijun XU. Production Analysis and Selection of Suitable Varieties in Sugarcane Intercropping System[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 37-45.
安东升, 严程明, 刘洋, 赵宝山, 孔冉, 苏俊波, 徐志军. 甘蔗间作系统生产力分析及适宜品种筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 37-45.
Fig. 2 Plant height and sugarcane tiller number under different intercropping patternsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different varieties of same crop at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 间作品种 Intercropping variety | 有效茎长 Effective stem length/cm | 茎径 Stem diameter/mm | 单茎重 Single stem weigh/kg | 有效茎数 Effective stalk mumbers/(104·hm-2) | 产量 Yield/ (t·hm-2) | 减产率 Reduction rate/% | 田间糖锤度 Brix/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甘蔗单作 Sugarcane monocrop | ROC22 | 356.6±27.4 a | 28.9±2.3 bcd | 1.72±0.27 a | 6.62±0.22 a | 113.4±10.8a | — | 22.5±1.4 ab |
甘蔗/甜玉米间作 Sugarcane/ sweetcorn intercropping | 中农甜414 Zhongnongtian 414 | 287.0±31.7 cd | 27.3±2.3 cde | 1.47±0.36 bc | 3.24±0.08 d | 47.5±5.1 e | 58.13 | 22.7±1.1 a |
中农甜488 Zhongnongtian 488 | 285.6±28.4 cd | 26.9±2.1 de | 1.39±0.21 c | 3.10±0.36 de | 43.1±7.1 e | 62.00 | 22.2±0.9 ab | |
粤甜28 Yuetian 28 | 269.0±28.8 de | 25.5±2.2 e | 1.16±0.28 d | 2.57±0.14 f | 29.8±4.0 f | 73.70 | 21.3±0.7 b | |
华美甜9 Huameitian 9 | 253.1±25.2 e | 26.7±1.6 de | 1.12±0.23 d | 2.81±0.22 def | 31.9±8.1 f | 71.86 | 21.6±1.2 ab | |
正甜68 Zhengtian 68 | 248.7±23.0 e | 25.3±1.6 e | 1.15±0.20 d | 2.72±0.14 ef | 31.1±2.0 f | 72.54 | 21.3±1.2 b | |
甘蔗/花生间作 Sugarcane/ peanut intercropping | 湛红5 Zhanhong 5 | 304.3±24.9 bc | 28.9±3.1 bcd | 1.60±0.20 abc | 5.13±0.30 c | 82.9±9.5 d | 26.85 | 21.3±1.6 ab |
湛油6 Zhanyou 6 | 315.8±20.2 bc | 31.2±2.1 ab | 1.69±0.10 ab | 5.15±0.29 c | 86.8±3.7 cd | 23.47 | 22.7±1.4 a | |
ZPG113 | 331.2±24.4 ab | 29.7±1.4 abc | 1.67±0.20 ab | 5.72±0.38 b | 95.2±9.1 bc | 16.01 | 22.4±0.8 ab | |
湛油1155 Zhanyou 1155 | 355.8±35.4 a | 31.4±2.2 a | 1.72±0.18 a | 5.81±0.22 b | 100.1±3.5 b | 11.73 | 22.5±1.1 ab | |
湛油75 Zhanyou 75 | 293.7±16.9 cd | 28.4±1.6 cd | 1.62±0.17 ab | 5.19±0.30 c | 84.3±5.5 d | 25.64 | 21.3±1.1 ab | |
热红1 Rehong 1 | 307.6±37.3 bc | 28.9±3.1 bcd | 1.64±0.25 ab | 5.24±0.22 c | 85.9±1.6 cd | 24.23 | 21.6±1.5 ab | |
湛油62 Zhanyou 62 | 293.1±40.5 cd | 29.1±3.0 bcd | 1.67±0.27 ab | 5.10±0.44 c | 84.7±1.9 d | 25.33 | 21.8±1.2 ab |
Table 1 Sugarcane yield components under different intercropping patterns in field
处理 Treatment | 间作品种 Intercropping variety | 有效茎长 Effective stem length/cm | 茎径 Stem diameter/mm | 单茎重 Single stem weigh/kg | 有效茎数 Effective stalk mumbers/(104·hm-2) | 产量 Yield/ (t·hm-2) | 减产率 Reduction rate/% | 田间糖锤度 Brix/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甘蔗单作 Sugarcane monocrop | ROC22 | 356.6±27.4 a | 28.9±2.3 bcd | 1.72±0.27 a | 6.62±0.22 a | 113.4±10.8a | — | 22.5±1.4 ab |
甘蔗/甜玉米间作 Sugarcane/ sweetcorn intercropping | 中农甜414 Zhongnongtian 414 | 287.0±31.7 cd | 27.3±2.3 cde | 1.47±0.36 bc | 3.24±0.08 d | 47.5±5.1 e | 58.13 | 22.7±1.1 a |
中农甜488 Zhongnongtian 488 | 285.6±28.4 cd | 26.9±2.1 de | 1.39±0.21 c | 3.10±0.36 de | 43.1±7.1 e | 62.00 | 22.2±0.9 ab | |
粤甜28 Yuetian 28 | 269.0±28.8 de | 25.5±2.2 e | 1.16±0.28 d | 2.57±0.14 f | 29.8±4.0 f | 73.70 | 21.3±0.7 b | |
华美甜9 Huameitian 9 | 253.1±25.2 e | 26.7±1.6 de | 1.12±0.23 d | 2.81±0.22 def | 31.9±8.1 f | 71.86 | 21.6±1.2 ab | |
正甜68 Zhengtian 68 | 248.7±23.0 e | 25.3±1.6 e | 1.15±0.20 d | 2.72±0.14 ef | 31.1±2.0 f | 72.54 | 21.3±1.2 b | |
甘蔗/花生间作 Sugarcane/ peanut intercropping | 湛红5 Zhanhong 5 | 304.3±24.9 bc | 28.9±3.1 bcd | 1.60±0.20 abc | 5.13±0.30 c | 82.9±9.5 d | 26.85 | 21.3±1.6 ab |
湛油6 Zhanyou 6 | 315.8±20.2 bc | 31.2±2.1 ab | 1.69±0.10 ab | 5.15±0.29 c | 86.8±3.7 cd | 23.47 | 22.7±1.4 a | |
ZPG113 | 331.2±24.4 ab | 29.7±1.4 abc | 1.67±0.20 ab | 5.72±0.38 b | 95.2±9.1 bc | 16.01 | 22.4±0.8 ab | |
湛油1155 Zhanyou 1155 | 355.8±35.4 a | 31.4±2.2 a | 1.72±0.18 a | 5.81±0.22 b | 100.1±3.5 b | 11.73 | 22.5±1.1 ab | |
湛油75 Zhanyou 75 | 293.7±16.9 cd | 28.4±1.6 cd | 1.62±0.17 ab | 5.19±0.30 c | 84.3±5.5 d | 25.64 | 21.3±1.1 ab | |
热红1 Rehong 1 | 307.6±37.3 bc | 28.9±3.1 bcd | 1.64±0.25 ab | 5.24±0.22 c | 85.9±1.6 cd | 24.23 | 21.6±1.5 ab | |
湛油62 Zhanyou 62 | 293.1±40.5 cd | 29.1±3.0 bcd | 1.67±0.27 ab | 5.10±0.44 c | 84.7±1.9 d | 25.33 | 21.8±1.2 ab |
处理 Treatment | 间作品种 Intercropping variety | 产量 Yield/(t·hm-2) | 穗(仁)产量Ear (kernel) yield/(t·hm-2) | 净穗率(出仁率) Net ear (benevolent) rate/% | 田间糖锤度 (含油量) Brix(oil content)/% | 秸秆输入量 Straw carbon input/(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甘蔗/甜玉米 间作 Sugarcane/sweetcorn intercropping | 中农甜414 Zhongnongtian 414 | 15.62±0.10 bc | 11.91±1.29 ab | 76.10 | 15.00±0.50 a | 3.32±0.27 d |
中农甜488 Zhongnongtian 488 | 14.51±0.91 c | 11.35±0.64 b | 78.41 | 14.60±0.50 ab | 4.25±0.69 d | |
粤甜28 Yuetian 28 | 19.15±1.25 a | 8.80±1.32 c | 46.05 | 13.40±0.70 bc | 11.59±1.07 a | |
华美甜9 Huameitian 9 | 18.57±0.88 a | 13.85±0.63 a | 74.54 | 13.40±0.50 bc | 6.37±0.36 c | |
正甜68 Zhengtian 68 | 16.88±1.03 ab | 10.61±0.81 bc | 62.86 | 12.50±0.90 c | 8.11±1.54 b | |
甘蔗/花生间作 Sugarcane/peanut intercropping | 湛红5 Zhanhong 5 | 1.90±0.30 ab | 0.93±0.17 ab | 49.00 | 49.37±1.02 c | 2.96±0.24 a |
湛油6 Zhanyou 6 | 1.70±0.19 b | 0.84±0.10 b | 49.69 | 52.24±1.03 b | 2.19±0.11 bc | |
ZPG113 | 1.66±0.16 b | 0.88±0.08 b | 53.07 | — | 2.16±0.45 bc | |
湛油1155 Zhanyou 1155 | 2.21±0.19 a | 1.10±0.13 a | 49.77 | 56.16±0.32 a | 2.75±0.30 ab | |
湛油75 Zhanyou 75 | 1.87±0.24 ab | 0.98±0.09 ab | 52.17 | 55.01±1.61 a | 2.00±0.28 c | |
热红1 Rehong 1 | 1.75±0.05 b | 1.10±0.05 a | 62.93 | 49.27±1.07 c | 2.19±0.50 bc | |
湛油62 Zhanyou 62 | 1.80±0.14 b | 1.00±0.07 ab | 55.02 | 56.79±0.76 a | 2.11±0.23 bc |
Table 2 Economic characters of intercropping crops under different intercropping patterns
处理 Treatment | 间作品种 Intercropping variety | 产量 Yield/(t·hm-2) | 穗(仁)产量Ear (kernel) yield/(t·hm-2) | 净穗率(出仁率) Net ear (benevolent) rate/% | 田间糖锤度 (含油量) Brix(oil content)/% | 秸秆输入量 Straw carbon input/(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甘蔗/甜玉米 间作 Sugarcane/sweetcorn intercropping | 中农甜414 Zhongnongtian 414 | 15.62±0.10 bc | 11.91±1.29 ab | 76.10 | 15.00±0.50 a | 3.32±0.27 d |
中农甜488 Zhongnongtian 488 | 14.51±0.91 c | 11.35±0.64 b | 78.41 | 14.60±0.50 ab | 4.25±0.69 d | |
粤甜28 Yuetian 28 | 19.15±1.25 a | 8.80±1.32 c | 46.05 | 13.40±0.70 bc | 11.59±1.07 a | |
华美甜9 Huameitian 9 | 18.57±0.88 a | 13.85±0.63 a | 74.54 | 13.40±0.50 bc | 6.37±0.36 c | |
正甜68 Zhengtian 68 | 16.88±1.03 ab | 10.61±0.81 bc | 62.86 | 12.50±0.90 c | 8.11±1.54 b | |
甘蔗/花生间作 Sugarcane/peanut intercropping | 湛红5 Zhanhong 5 | 1.90±0.30 ab | 0.93±0.17 ab | 49.00 | 49.37±1.02 c | 2.96±0.24 a |
湛油6 Zhanyou 6 | 1.70±0.19 b | 0.84±0.10 b | 49.69 | 52.24±1.03 b | 2.19±0.11 bc | |
ZPG113 | 1.66±0.16 b | 0.88±0.08 b | 53.07 | — | 2.16±0.45 bc | |
湛油1155 Zhanyou 1155 | 2.21±0.19 a | 1.10±0.13 a | 49.77 | 56.16±0.32 a | 2.75±0.30 ab | |
湛油75 Zhanyou 75 | 1.87±0.24 ab | 0.98±0.09 ab | 52.17 | 55.01±1.61 a | 2.00±0.28 c | |
热红1 Rehong 1 | 1.75±0.05 b | 1.10±0.05 a | 62.93 | 49.27±1.07 c | 2.19±0.50 bc | |
湛油62 Zhanyou 62 | 1.80±0.14 b | 1.00±0.07 ab | 55.02 | 56.79±0.76 a | 2.11±0.23 bc |
处理 Treatment | 间作品种 Intercropping variety | 甘蔗收益/(104元·hm-2) Sugarcane income/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 甘蔗成本/(104元·hm-2) Sugarcane cost/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 甘蔗利润/(104元·hm-2) Sugarcane profit/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 间作收益/(104元·hm-2) Intercrop income/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 间作成本/(104元·hm-2) Inter crop cost /(104 yuan·hm-2) | 间作利润/(104元·hm-2) Inter crop income/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 总利润/(104元·hm-2) Total profit /(104 yuan·hm-2) | 利润增幅 Profit increase/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甘蔗单作 Sugarcane monocrop | ROC22 | 5.556 | 3.546 | 2.010 | — | — | — | 2.010 | — |
甘蔗/甜玉米间作 Sugarcane/sweetcorn intercropping | 中农甜414 Zhongnongtian 414 | 2.326 | 2.557 | -0.231 | 4.999 | 1.5 | 3.499 | 3.268 | 62.56 |
中农甜488 Zhongnongtian 488 | 2.117 | 2.491 | -0.374 | 4.355 | 1.5 | 2.855 | 2.481 | 23.13 | |
粤甜28 Yuetian 28 | 1.461 | 2.292 | -0.831 | 4.595 | 1.5 | 3.095 | 2.264 | 12.62 | |
华美甜9 Huameitian 9 | 1.563 | 2.323 | -0.760 | 5.200 | 1.5 | 3.700 | 2.940 | 46.27 | |
正甜68 Zhengtian 68 | 1.526 | 2.312 | -0.786 | 4.051 | 1.5 | 2.551 | 1.765 | -12.22 | |
甘蔗/花生间作 Sugarcane/peanut intercropping | 湛红5 Zhanhong 5 | 4.064 | 2.996 | 1.068 | 1.520 | 0.6 | 0.920 | 1.988 | -5.53 |
湛油6 Zhanyou 6 | 4.252 | 3.100 | 1.152 | 1.359 | 0.6 | 0.759 | 1.911 | -7.22 | |
ZPG113 | 4.666 | 3.273 | 1.393 | 1.987 | 0.6 | 1.387 | 2.780 | 38.30 | |
湛油1155 Zhanyou 1155 | 4.904 | 3.346 | 1.558 | 1.771 | 0.6 | 1.171 | 2.729 | 35.73 | |
湛油75 Zhanyou 75 | 4.131 | 3.032 | 1.099 | 1.497 | 0.6 | 0.897 | 1.996 | -4.54 | |
热红1 Rehong 1 | 4.210 | 3.094 | 1.116 | 1.397 | 0.6 | 0.797 | 1.913 | -6.84 | |
湛油62 Zhanyou 62 | 4.148 | 3.038 | 1.110 | 1.439 | 0.6 | 0.839 | 1.949 | -6.84 |
Table 3 Analysis of economic benefits under different intercropping system
处理 Treatment | 间作品种 Intercropping variety | 甘蔗收益/(104元·hm-2) Sugarcane income/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 甘蔗成本/(104元·hm-2) Sugarcane cost/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 甘蔗利润/(104元·hm-2) Sugarcane profit/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 间作收益/(104元·hm-2) Intercrop income/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 间作成本/(104元·hm-2) Inter crop cost /(104 yuan·hm-2) | 间作利润/(104元·hm-2) Inter crop income/(104 yuan·hm-2) | 总利润/(104元·hm-2) Total profit /(104 yuan·hm-2) | 利润增幅 Profit increase/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甘蔗单作 Sugarcane monocrop | ROC22 | 5.556 | 3.546 | 2.010 | — | — | — | 2.010 | — |
甘蔗/甜玉米间作 Sugarcane/sweetcorn intercropping | 中农甜414 Zhongnongtian 414 | 2.326 | 2.557 | -0.231 | 4.999 | 1.5 | 3.499 | 3.268 | 62.56 |
中农甜488 Zhongnongtian 488 | 2.117 | 2.491 | -0.374 | 4.355 | 1.5 | 2.855 | 2.481 | 23.13 | |
粤甜28 Yuetian 28 | 1.461 | 2.292 | -0.831 | 4.595 | 1.5 | 3.095 | 2.264 | 12.62 | |
华美甜9 Huameitian 9 | 1.563 | 2.323 | -0.760 | 5.200 | 1.5 | 3.700 | 2.940 | 46.27 | |
正甜68 Zhengtian 68 | 1.526 | 2.312 | -0.786 | 4.051 | 1.5 | 2.551 | 1.765 | -12.22 | |
甘蔗/花生间作 Sugarcane/peanut intercropping | 湛红5 Zhanhong 5 | 4.064 | 2.996 | 1.068 | 1.520 | 0.6 | 0.920 | 1.988 | -5.53 |
湛油6 Zhanyou 6 | 4.252 | 3.100 | 1.152 | 1.359 | 0.6 | 0.759 | 1.911 | -7.22 | |
ZPG113 | 4.666 | 3.273 | 1.393 | 1.987 | 0.6 | 1.387 | 2.780 | 38.30 | |
湛油1155 Zhanyou 1155 | 4.904 | 3.346 | 1.558 | 1.771 | 0.6 | 1.171 | 2.729 | 35.73 | |
湛油75 Zhanyou 75 | 4.131 | 3.032 | 1.099 | 1.497 | 0.6 | 0.897 | 1.996 | -4.54 | |
热红1 Rehong 1 | 4.210 | 3.094 | 1.116 | 1.397 | 0.6 | 0.797 | 1.913 | -6.84 | |
湛油62 Zhanyou 62 | 4.148 | 3.038 | 1.110 | 1.439 | 0.6 | 0.839 | 1.949 | -6.84 |
1 | 张艳, 张禄祥,肖广江,等. 2013 年广东甘蔗产业发展形势与对策建议[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014 (4): 11-14. |
ZHANG Y, ZHANG L X, XIAO G J, et al.. Development situation and countermeasures of Guangdong sugarcane industry in 2013 [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2014 (4): 11-14. | |
2 | 韦巧,杨宝玲,高振江. 我国甘蔗产业化现状浅析[J]. 农机化研究, 2015(4): 247-254. |
WEI Q, YANG B L, GAO Z J. Analysis of current situation of sugar cane industry [J]. J. Agric. Mech. Res., 2015(4): 247-254. | |
3 | 罗亚伟,王维赞,朱秋珍,等. 甘蔗机械化种植不同宽窄行行距新植、宿根试验 [J]. 广西蔗糖, 2011 (1): 3-6. |
4 | WANG X L, FENG Y J, YU L L, et al.. Sugarcane/soybean intercropping with reduced nitrogen input improves crop productivity and reduces carbon footprint in China [J/OL]. Sci. Total Environ., 2020, 719:137517 [2022-08-06]. . |
5 | YU L L, LUO S S, GUO Y G, et al.. Structure of rhizospheric microbial community and N cycling functional gene shifts with reduced N input in sugarcane-soybean intercropping in South China [J/OL]. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2021, 314: 107413 [2022-08-06]. . |
6 | 杨文亭,李志贤,赖健宁,等. 甘蔗-大豆间作和减量施氮对甘蔗产量和主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(3): 556-562. |
YANG W T, LI Z X, LAI J N, et al.. Effects of sugarcane-soybean intercropping and reduced nitrogen application on yield and major agronomic traits of sugarcane [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2014, 40(3): 556-562. | |
7 | 杨建波, 彭东海, 覃刘东, 等. 低氮条件下甘蔗-大豆间作对甘蔗产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26 (5): 1426-1432. |
YANG J B, PENG D H, QIN L D, et al.. Effects of sugarcane-soybean intercropping on cane yield,quality and economic benefit under low nitrogen condition [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2015, 26 (5): 1426-1432. | |
8 | 赵自东,贾应明,李言春,等. 甘蔗与不同花生品种间套种试验总结[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2012( 2): 21-23. |
ZHAO Z D, JIA Y M, LI Y C, et al.. Interplant different peanut varieties with sugarcane [J]. Sugarcane Canesugar, 2012( 2): 21-23. | |
9 | 全林发,肖学明,方越,等. 甘蔗间作花生播期筛选试验[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013(18): 11-12. |
QUAN L F, XIAO X M, FANG Y, et al.. Sowing date screening of peanut intercropping with sugarcane [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2013(18): 11-12. | |
10 | 韦贵剑,陆文娟,彭天缘,等. 甘蔗间套种花生最佳模式探讨[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46 (6): 1007-1011. |
WEI G J, LU W J, PENG T Y, et al.. Preliminary report on optimal planting model for sugarcane intercropped with peanut [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2015, 46 (6): 1007-1011. | |
11 | 李志贤, 杨文亭, 王建武. 甘蔗-甜玉米间作对甘蔗产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(1): 98-104. |
LI Z X, YANG W T, WANG J W. Effect of sugarcane-sweet corn intercropping on yield,quality and economic benefit of sugarcane [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2014, 33(1): 98-104. | |
12 | NAVNEET K, MAKHAN S B, GURJEET G. Weed management options for sugarcane-vegetable intercropping systems in north-western India [J]. Crop Prot., 2015, 74: 18-23. |
13 | 周慧文,闫海锋,丘立杭, 等. 甘蔗间套种西瓜栽培模式分析[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2021, 34(1): 71-75. |
ZHOU H W, YAN H F, QIU L H, et al.. Analysis of planting modes of sugarcane intercropping with watermelon [J]. Agric. Res. Appl., 2021, 34(1): 71-75. | |
14 | 覃慧珍. 南方甘蔗间种辣椒高效栽培技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014 (1): 122, 129. |
QIN H Z. Cultivation techniques of sugarcane intercropping pepper in southern region [J]. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2014 (1): 122, 129. | |
15 | 刘建荣,田夏红,冯学娟,等. 甘蔗与花生间作模式对土壤养分及甘蔗生产的影响[J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2021, 50(4): 6-10. |
LIU J R, TIAN X H, FENG X J, et al.. The effect of sugarcane and peanut intercropping mode on the soil nutrientsand sugarcane production [J]. Sugarcane Canesugar, 2021, 50(4): 6-10. | |
16 | 沈雪峰, 方越, 董朝霞, 等. 甘蔗花生间作对甘蔗地土壤杂草种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3): 656-660. |
SHEN X F, FANG Y, DONG C X, et al.. Effect of intercropping sugarcane with peanut on weed seed germination in sugarcane soil [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2015, 34(3): 656-660. | |
17 | 秦昌鲜, 彭崇, 郭强, 等. 甘蔗花生间作对红壤有效磷、pH 值的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(11): 137-140. |
QIN C X, PENG C, GUO Q, et al.. Effects of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on available phosphorus and pH values in red soil [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2019, 47(11): 137-140. | |
18 | 唐秀梅, 蒙秀珍, 蒋菁, 等. 甘蔗间作花生对不同耕层土壤微生态的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(5): 713-722. |
TANG X M, MENG X Z, JIANG J, et al.. Effects of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on soil microenvironment in different plough layer [J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci., 2020, 42(5): 713-722. | |
19 | 沈雪峰, 方越, 董朝霞,等. 甘蔗/花生间作对土壤微生物和土壤酶活性的影响 [J]. 作物杂志, 2014 (5): 55-58. |
SHEN X F, FANG Y, DONG C X, et al.. Effects of sugarcane/peanut intercropping on soil microbes and soil enzyme activities [J]. Crops, 2014 (5): 55-58. | |
20 | 金华立, 崔彬彬. 花生种子含油量近红外测定模型建立[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2014, 27(9): 49-51. |
JIN H L, CUI B B. Establishment of testing model of seeds oil content in peanut by near infrared spectrum [J]. Cereals Oils, 2014, 27(9): 49-51. | |
21 | 王季槐, 陈庄, 何春林, 等.不同甘蔗品种锤度与糖分的关系 [J]. 湛江海洋大学学报, 2003, 23(4):62-66. |
WANG J H, CHEN Z, HE C L, et al.. Relationships between brix and sugar content in different varieties of sugarcane [J]. J. Zhanjiang Ocean Univ., 2003, 23(4):62-66. | |
22 | 李佳慧, 程琴, 欧克纬, 等. 不同蔗区甘蔗品种(系)分蘖性状比较及其对产量和产量构成因子的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021 (5): 79-86. |
LI J H, CHENG Q, OU K W, et al.. Comparison of tiller characters of sugarcane varieties (lines) in different sugarcane regions and their effects on yield and yield components [J]. Crops, 2021 (5): 79-86. | |
23 | MEBRAHTOM F, FIREW M, EYASU A. Multivariate analysis of sugar yield contributing traits in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), in Ethiopia [J]. Afric. J. Plant Sci., 2016, 10 (8): 145-156. |
24 | MARCHIORI P E R, RIBEIRO R V, SILVA L D, et al.. Plant growth, canopy photosynthesis and light availability in three sugarcane varieties [J]. Sugar Technol., 2010, 12 (2):160-166. |
25 | 丘立杭, 李强, 黄杏,等. 弱光胁迫影响甘蔗叶片内源激素的平衡和分蘖进程[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53 (2): 280-290. |
QIU L H, LI Q, HUANG X, et al.. Weak-light stress caused by shading affects the balance of endogenous hormones in leaves and tillering process in sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum) [J]. Plant Physiol. J., 2017, 53 (2): 280-290. | |
26 | WANG G, ROMHELD V, LI C, et al.. Involvement of auxinand CKs in boron deficiency induced changes in apical dominance of pea plants [J]. J. Plant Physiol., 2006, 163 (6): 591-600. |
27 | 黎正英, 丘立杭, 闫海锋, 等. 外源赤霉素信号对甘蔗分蘖及其内源激素的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42 (10): 2942-2951. |
LI Z Y, QIU L H, YAN H F, et al.. Effect of exogenous gibberellin signal on sugarcane tillering and its endogenous hormones [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2021, 42 (10): 2942-2951. | |
28 | 李志贤, 王建武, 杨文亭,等. 甘蔗/大豆间作减量施氮对甘蔗产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(3): 713-719. |
LI Z X, WANG J W, YANG W T, et al.. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on the yield,quality,and economic benefit of sugarcane intercropped with soybean [J].Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2011, 22(3): 713-719. | |
29 | 吴才文, 杨洪昌, 陈学宽, 等. 苗期间种黄豆对甘蔗生长及产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2004, 17(5): 645-650. |
WU C W, YANG H C, CHEN X K, et al.. Effect of soybean intercropping on the growth and yield of sugarcane at seedling stage [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2004, 17(5): 645-650. | |
30 | SINGH A K, LAL M, SUMAN A. Effect of intercropping in sugarcane (Saccharum complex hybrid) on productivity of plant cane-ratoon system [J]. Indian J. Agron., 2008, 53(2): 140-144. |
31 | KAMRUZZAMAN M, HASANUZZAMA M. Factors affecting profitability of sugarcane production as monoculture and as intercrop in selected areas of Bangladesh [J].Bangladesh J. Agric. Res., 2007, 32: 433-444. |
32 | 刘宇锋, 潘增宝, 苏天明,等. 果蔗-花生不同间种处理对产量、经济效益和土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(12): 2333-2340 |
LIU Y F, PAN Z B, SU T M, et al.. Effects of different chewing cane-peanut intercropping treatments on yield, economic benefit and soil physicochemical properties [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2019, 40(12): 2333-2340. | |
33 | 谭裕模, 江泽普, 刘斌, 等. 间种对不同基因型甘蔗生长产量影响与经济效益分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2010,31(11): 1895-1901. |
TAN Y M, JIANG Z P, LIU B, et al.. Analysis of interplanting on the influence of growth, yield of sugarcane with various genotypes and its economic returns [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2010, 31(11): 1895-1901. |
[1] | Jiayu HU, Yang YANG, Hongyan ZHANG, Bingyang GAO, Linglu WANG, Junying YAN, Xiaomei SUN, Yanan ZHAO, Youliang YE. Effect of Topdressing Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Intercropped Peanut with Wheat [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 191-197. |
[2] | Chunlin CHEN, Linyang WANG, Mengwei SHAN, Tiantian PEI, Jiqing WANG, Huaijuan XIAO, Juanqi LI, Meng LI, Qingjie DU. Effects of Fermented Peanut Shell and Cow Dung Instead of Peat Substrate on Tomato Seedling [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 205-214. |
[3] | Yegeng FAN, Lihang QIU, Rongfa CHEN, Huiwen ZHOU, Yanjiao LI, Haifeng YAN, Hanmin LUO, Zhongfeng ZHOU, Yuchi DENG, Jianming WU. Study on Productivity Differences and Correlation of Sugarcane Varieties with Different Tillering Characteristics [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 35-43. |
[4] | Li QI, Zhenjia HE. Effects of Peanut Planting Modes on Desertification in the North Agro⁃pastoral Zone [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 177-187. |
[5] | Qionghua LI, Lin ZHANG, Xinru HAN, Lili SONG. Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Total Factor Productivity of Double Cropping Rice in China and Its Countermeasures [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 15-23. |
[6] | Liangxiang DAI, Guanchu ZHANG, Hong DING, Yang XU, Zhimeng ZHANG. Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Calcium Fertilizer on Peanut Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Structure in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 189-201. |
[7] | Mengshi PAN, Wenyang GUO, Liuzhu ZHOU, Li DENG, Jianli MIAO, Hongguang XU, Zongyuan ZHANG, Landa QI. Evaluation of Efficacy in Field and Mechanism of Bacillus velezensis Agents for Controling Peanut Stem Rot Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(11): 130-136. |
[8] | HU Ting, QUAN Wei, WU Mingliang, LI Lin. Design and Experiment of Seed Channel Opener for Double Ridge Four Row Peanut Seeder [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 129-137. |
[9] | LI Chengchen, SUO Haicui, LUO Huanming, AN Kang, LIU Jitao, WANG Li, SHAN Jianwei, YANG Shaohai, LI Xiaobo. Effects of Reduced Fertilizer Application and Fertilization Methods on Potato Yield and Tuber Nitrogen Accumulation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 173-182. |
[10] | YI Miao1,2§, WANG Jianguo2§, YIN Jin1, GUO Feng2, ZHANG Jialei2, TANG Zhaohui2, LI Xinguo2,3*, WAN Shubo2,3*. Impact of Nitrogen and Calcium Application on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Peanut in Flowering Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 164-172. |
[11] | ZHOU Jinying, WANG Li, ZHU Shuilan, LUO Jing, FAN Qiping, FENG Jianxiong*. Effects of Different Storage Technology on Peanut Quality [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(2): 134-140. |
[12] | WU Guangjun, HUANG Zhiyin, ZHANG Chao, LU Duxu, ZHAI Naijia, QIAO Jian, LIU Weixia, WANG Ningning, WANG Guangming. Study on Nitrogen Reduction and Efficiency Increase Technology Under Water-fertilizer Integration of Summer Maize in Central Region of Shandong Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 145-152. |
[13] | WANG Yuyun, WANG Hongfu*, LI Zhi, DUAN Hongkai, HUANG Shanshan. Influences of MilletPeanut Intercropping on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(5): 153-165. |
[14] | WANG Fei1, WANG Jianguo2, LI Lin1*, LIU Dengwang1*, WAN Shubo2, ZHANG Hao1. Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on the Absorption, Accumulation and Distribution of Ca and Zn in Peanut [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(5): 166-173. |
[15] | LI Qingkai1,2,3, LIU Ping2,3*, ZHAO Haijun3, SONG Xiaozong2, LIN Haitao2, SHEN Yuwen2, LI Lin1, WAN Shubo1,3*. Effects of Maize Root Exudates on Allelopathy of Phenolic Acids in Soil of Continuous Cropping Peanut [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(3): 119-130. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||