Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 36-46.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0981
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xueqing LIU(), Jing WANG, Yi YANG, Huiqin WU, Yanhong WANG, Luyao WANG, Jiawei LU, Kaixuan ZHANG, Yuan ZHAI, Yan CHENG(
)
Received:
2024-11-25
Accepted:
2024-12-26
Online:
2025-08-15
Published:
2025-08-26
Contact:
Yan CHENG
刘雪晴(), 王静, 阳宜, 吴慧琴, 王延宏, 王麓尧, 路佳伟, 张凯璇, 翟源, 成妍(
)
通讯作者:
成妍
作者简介:
刘雪晴E-mail:1652820655@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xueqing LIU, Jing WANG, Yi YANG, Huiqin WU, Yanhong WANG, Luyao WANG, Jiawei LU, Kaixuan ZHANG, Yuan ZHAI, Yan CHENG. Effect of Exogenous Ethephon on Defoliation and Yield of Pigmented Pepper[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 36-46.
刘雪晴, 王静, 阳宜, 吴慧琴, 王延宏, 王麓尧, 路佳伟, 张凯璇, 翟源, 成妍. 外源乙烯利对色素辣椒脱叶及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(8): 36-46.
处理 Treatment | 处理后时间Time after processing/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
CK | 2.033±0.569 f | 5.573±0.103 e | 6.195±0.550 e | 8.685±0.106 f | 9.904±0.071 f |
T200 | 4.753±0.100 | 8.150±0.231 d | 13.012±0.825 d | 23.873±0.328 e | 33.178±2.107 e |
T400 | 9.441±0.127 d | 13.908±0.368 c | 21.764±0.500 c | 33.526±0.682 d | 35.650±0.357 d |
T600 | 16.588±0.252 a | 27.782±2.032 a | 32.462±1.015 a | 43.952±0.437 a | 54.110±2.029 a |
T800 | 14.746±0.058 b | 26.261±0.785 ab | 30.970±1.516 ab | 37.569±1.011 b | 49.018±0.478 b |
T1000 | 12.595±0.080 c | 25.478±1.860 b | 29.902±2.074 b | 35.638±0.502 c | 46.721±0.448 c |
Table 1 Deciduous rates of pepper under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 处理后时间Time after processing/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
CK | 2.033±0.569 f | 5.573±0.103 e | 6.195±0.550 e | 8.685±0.106 f | 9.904±0.071 f |
T200 | 4.753±0.100 | 8.150±0.231 d | 13.012±0.825 d | 23.873±0.328 e | 33.178±2.107 e |
T400 | 9.441±0.127 d | 13.908±0.368 c | 21.764±0.500 c | 33.526±0.682 d | 35.650±0.357 d |
T600 | 16.588±0.252 a | 27.782±2.032 a | 32.462±1.015 a | 43.952±0.437 a | 54.110±2.029 a |
T800 | 14.746±0.058 b | 26.261±0.785 ab | 30.970±1.516 ab | 37.569±1.011 b | 49.018±0.478 b |
T1000 | 12.595±0.080 c | 25.478±1.860 b | 29.902±2.074 b | 35.638±0.502 c | 46.721±0.448 c |
处理 Treatment | 处理后时间Time after processing/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
CK | 20.33±1.53 c | 22.33±1.53 b | 21.67±0.58 c | 23.33±1.53 c | 23.67±1.53 c |
T200 | 24.33±0.58 ab | 26.33±1.53 a | 25.67±1.53 b | 27.33±1.53 b | 26.67±0.58 b |
T400 | 22.33±1.53 bc | 25.67±1.53 a | 24.67±1.53 b | 25.67±1.53 bc | 28.33±1.53 b |
T600 | 25.00±1.00 a | 27.33±1.53 a | 29.67±1.53 a | 30.00±1.00 a | 31.00±1.00 a |
T800 | 23.33±1.53 ab | 17.67±1.53 c | 17.67±1.53 d | 15.00±1.00 d | 16.67±1.53 d |
T1000 | 20.67±1.53 c | 16.33±1.53 c | 14.67±1.53 e | 14.33±1.53 d | 11.67±0.58 e |
Table 2 Number of fruits per plant of pigmented pepper under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 处理后时间Time after processing/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
CK | 20.33±1.53 c | 22.33±1.53 b | 21.67±0.58 c | 23.33±1.53 c | 23.67±1.53 c |
T200 | 24.33±0.58 ab | 26.33±1.53 a | 25.67±1.53 b | 27.33±1.53 b | 26.67±0.58 b |
T400 | 22.33±1.53 bc | 25.67±1.53 a | 24.67±1.53 b | 25.67±1.53 bc | 28.33±1.53 b |
T600 | 25.00±1.00 a | 27.33±1.53 a | 29.67±1.53 a | 30.00±1.00 a | 31.00±1.00 a |
T800 | 23.33±1.53 ab | 17.67±1.53 c | 17.67±1.53 d | 15.00±1.00 d | 16.67±1.53 d |
T1000 | 20.67±1.53 c | 16.33±1.53 c | 14.67±1.53 e | 14.33±1.53 d | 11.67±0.58 e |
处理 Treatment | 处理后时间Time after processing/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
CK | 17.26±4.28 ab | 18.10±1.64 ab | 18.60±1.00 abc | 19.08±1.27 b | 19.36±1.11 bc |
T200 | 16.53±4.49 ab | 18.60±1.23 ab | 18.13±1.72 abc | 20.56±1.99 ab | 21.88±1.10 a |
T400 | 19.20±2.57 a | 19.52±2.24 ab | 18.88±1.38 ab | 19.47±2.08 ab | 21.61±1.61 ab |
T600 | 19.75±2.75 a | 20.63±3.20 a | 19.42±2.03 a | 21.54±2.13 a | 22.59±2.16 a |
T800 | 14.32±3.80 b | 17.50±2.07 b | 17.25±1.45 bc | 18.56±2.01 b | 18.69±2.66 c |
T1000 | 13.02±2.22 b | 17.23±1.63 b | 16.82±1.30 c | 18.36±1.41 b | 18.60±2.79 c |
Table 3 Single fruit weight of pigmented pepper under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 处理后时间Time after processing/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
CK | 17.26±4.28 ab | 18.10±1.64 ab | 18.60±1.00 abc | 19.08±1.27 b | 19.36±1.11 bc |
T200 | 16.53±4.49 ab | 18.60±1.23 ab | 18.13±1.72 abc | 20.56±1.99 ab | 21.88±1.10 a |
T400 | 19.20±2.57 a | 19.52±2.24 ab | 18.88±1.38 ab | 19.47±2.08 ab | 21.61±1.61 ab |
T600 | 19.75±2.75 a | 20.63±3.20 a | 19.42±2.03 a | 21.54±2.13 a | 22.59±2.16 a |
T800 | 14.32±3.80 b | 17.50±2.07 b | 17.25±1.45 bc | 18.56±2.01 b | 18.69±2.66 c |
T1000 | 13.02±2.22 b | 17.23±1.63 b | 16.82±1.30 c | 18.36±1.41 b | 18.60±2.79 c |
处理 Treatment | 处理后时间Time after processing/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
CK | 1.96±0.19 bc | 2.11±0.14 b | 2.00±0.15 c | 2.20±0.12 c | 2.38±0.21 c |
T200 | 2.23±0.19 ab | 2.50±0.07 ab | 2.34±0.18 b | 2.70±0.21 b | 2.90±0.15 b |
T400 | 2.16±0.04 abc | 2.58±0.33 a | 2.31±0.12 b | 2.64±0.20 b | 3.18±0.36 b |
T600 | 2.41±0.14 a | 2.66±0.37 a | 2.78±0.23 a | 3.28±0.17 a | 3.68±0.16 a |
T800 | 1.86±0.17 c | 1.51±0.17 c | 1.63±0.09 d | 1.41±0.08 d | 1.69±0.21 d |
T1000 | 1.18±0.22 d | 1.47±0.09 c | 1.23±0.04 e | 1.36±0.10 d | 1.14±0.17 e |
Table 4 Fruit yield per plant of pigmented pepper under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 处理后时间Time after processing/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | |
CK | 1.96±0.19 bc | 2.11±0.14 b | 2.00±0.15 c | 2.20±0.12 c | 2.38±0.21 c |
T200 | 2.23±0.19 ab | 2.50±0.07 ab | 2.34±0.18 b | 2.70±0.21 b | 2.90±0.15 b |
T400 | 2.16±0.04 abc | 2.58±0.33 a | 2.31±0.12 b | 2.64±0.20 b | 3.18±0.36 b |
T600 | 2.41±0.14 a | 2.66±0.37 a | 2.78±0.23 a | 3.28±0.17 a | 3.68±0.16 a |
T800 | 1.86±0.17 c | 1.51±0.17 c | 1.63±0.09 d | 1.41±0.08 d | 1.69±0.21 d |
T1000 | 1.18±0.22 d | 1.47±0.09 c | 1.23±0.04 e | 1.36±0.10 d | 1.14±0.17 e |
Fig. 3 Reducing sugar content in pigmented pepper leaf under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Soluble sugar content in pigmented pepper leaf under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 5 MDA content in pigmented pepper leaf under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 8 Correlation analysis between leaves and fruits of pigmented pepper under different treatmentsNote:DR—Deciduous rate;NOFPP—Number of fruits per plant;SFW—Single fruit weight;Y—Yield per plant;C—Chlorophyll content;S—Starch content;RS—Reducing sugar content;SS—Soluble sugars content;MDA—Malonaldehyde content;SOD—Superoxide dismutase activity;POD—Peroxide activity. *, ** and *** indicate significant correlations at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 levels, respectively.
Fig. 9 Principal component analysis of leaves and fruits of pigmented pepper under different treatmentsA: Scatter diagram; B:Load diagram. DR—Deciduous rate;NOFPP—Number of fruits per plant;SFW—Single fruit weight;Y—Yield per plant;C—Chlorophyll content; S—Starch content;RS—Reducing sugar content;SS—Soluble sugars content;MDA—Malonaldehyde content;SOD—Superoxide dismutase activity; POD—Peroxide activity
[1] | OLATUNJI T L, AFOLAYAN A J. The suitability of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) for alleviating human micronutrient dietary deficiencies: a review [J]. Food Sci. Nutr., 2018, 6(8): 2239-2251. |
[2] | WANG P, YIN L, LIANG D, et al.. Delayed senescence of apple leaves by exogenous melatonin treatment: toward regulating the ascorbate-glutathione cycle [J]. J. Pineal Res., 2012, 53(1): 11-20. |
[3] | 李中海,郭永峰,任国栋,等.叶片衰老研究进展[J].植物生理学报, 2023, 59 (9): 1627-1656. |
LI Z H, GUO Y F, REN G D, et al.. Advances in leaf senescence research [J]. Plant Physiol. J., 2023, 59(9): 1627-1656. | |
[4] | 吴立东,王家腾,刘亚婷,等.不同基肥配施对朝天椒产量和加工品质的影响[J].上海农业学报, 2024, 40(3): 23-28. |
WU L D, WANG J T, LIU Y T, et al.. Effects of different base fertilizer combinations on yield and processing quality of pod pepper [J]. Acta Agric. Shanghai, 2024, 40(3): 23-28. | |
[5] | 梁传静,邢丹,张爱民,等.不同脱叶剂对辣研102脱叶效果与产量的影响[J].农技服务, 2022, 39(9): 21-23. |
[6] | 付文婷,吴迪,吴康云,等.机采辣椒育种的发展及现状[J].农技服务, 2019, 36(10): 98-99. |
[7] | SUZUKI K, MORI M. Carotenoid composition of new cultivar of Capsicum annuum during maturation and its high capsanthin content [J]. Nippon. Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, 2003, 50(7): 324-326. |
[8] | 刘雪,叶甜甜,施帆,等.油茶成熟期喷施乙烯利对果实成熟及品质的影响[J].经济林研究, 2024, 42(1): 1-10. |
LIU X, YE T T, SHI F, et al.. Effects of ethephon spray treatments on ripening and quality of Camellia oleifera fruit during ripening [J]. Non-wood For. Res., 2024, 42(1):1-10. | |
[9] | 崔娅松,陈庆富,霍冬敖,等.植物落花落果的分子机理研究进展[J].广西植物, 2018, 38(9): 1234-1247. |
CUI Y S, CHEN Q F, HUO D A, et al.. Research progress on molecular mechanism of plant falling flowers and fruits [J]. Guihaia, 2018, 38(9): 1234-1247. | |
[10] | 丁欣欣,李秋煜,杨笑,等.乙烯利对核桃叶片衰老和光合同化产物的影响[J].北方园艺, 2022(8): 46-51. |
DING X X, LI Q Y, YANG X, et al.. Effects of ethephon on senescence and photo-contracted products of walnut leaves [J]. North. Hortic., 2022(8): 46-51. | |
[11] | 侯慧丰,张晶晶,罗怡璇,等.叶面喷施乙烯利对银杏叶生物量、生理及品质的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2024 (6): 112-119. |
HOU H F, ZHANG J J, LUO Y X, et al.. Effects of ethephon application on biomass,physiology and quality of Ginkgo biloba leaves [J]. J. Central South Univ. For. Technol., 2024(6): 112-119. | |
[12] | 黄山,唐文军,何彩莲,等.乙烯利、敌草快、噻苯隆处理对南方春大豆落叶的影响[J].湖南农业科学, 2020(12): 42-44. |
HUANG S, TANG W J, HE C L, et al.. Effects of ethephon, diquat and thidiazuron on the defoliation of spring soybean in South China [J]. Hunan Agric. Sci., 2020(12): 42-44. | |
[13] | 董美超,尹拓,周东果,等.两个柠檬品种叶片离区响应乙烯利处理的转录组分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(7): 1199-1210. |
DONG M C, YIN T, ZHOU D G, et al.. Transcriptome analysis of leaf abscission zones post ethephon treatment in two lemon varieties [J]. J. Plant Genetic Resour., 2024, 25(7): 1199-1210. | |
[14] | 肖怀娟,刘珂珂,马勇斌,等.外源脱落酸调控下辣椒叶片衰老过程的生理生化变化[J].河南农业大学学报, 2019, 53(3):357-364. |
XIAO H J, LIU K K, MA Y B, et al.. Physiological and biochemical changes during leaf senescence under the regulation of exogenous ABA in Capsicum annuum L. [J]. J. Henan Agric. Univ., 2019, 53(3): 357-364. | |
[15] | 徐江民,蒋玲欢,沈晨辉,等.多种外源激素处理对水稻叶片衰老的影响[J].浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 41(2): 201-206. |
XU J M, JIANG L H, SHEN C H, et al.. The influence of various exogenous hormone treatment on rice leaf senescence [J]. J. Zhejiang Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2018, 41(2): 201-206. | |
[16] | 孙晓英.喷施乙烯利对花生农艺性状、产量和品质的影响[D].秦皇岛:河北科技师范学院, 2023. |
SUN X Y. Effect of spraying ethephon on agronomic traits, yield and quality of peanut [D]. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2023. | |
[17] | ARKUS K A J, CAHOON E B, JEZ J M. Mechanistic analysis of wheat chlorophyllase [J]. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2005, 438(2): 146-155. |
[18] | 李明,王根轩.干旱胁迫对甘草幼苗保护酶活性及脂质过氧化作用的影响[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(4): 503-507. |
LI M, WANG G X. Effect of drought stress on activities of cell defense enzymes and lipid peroxidation in Glycyrrhiza uralensis seedlings [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2002, 22(4): 503-507. | |
[19] | 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000: 260-261. |
[20] | GIANNOPOLITIS C N, RIES S K. Superoxide dismutases [J]. Plant Physiol., 1977, 59(2): 309-314. |
[21] | HAMMERSCHMIDT R, NUCKLES E M, KUĆ J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium [J]. Physiol. Plant Pathol., 1982, 20(1): 73-82. |
[22] | 刘万代,张倩,汪大伟.氮肥基追比对不同成熟型小麦叶片衰老及产量的影响[J].湖南农业科学, 2015(3): 21-24. |
LIU W D, ZHANG Q, WANG D W. Effects of nitrogen-based recovery ratio on the leaf senescence and the yield of different maturing phases of wheat [J]. Hunan Agric. Sci., 2015(3): 21-24. | |
[23] | 杜霄力.不同种植密度对阜豆9号大豆生长发育及产量的影响[J].现代农业科技, 2016(15): 24-24, 26. |
[24] | 屈洋,马雯,刘晓婷,等.种植密度和喷施乙烯利对大豆产量和品质的影响[J].安徽农学通报, 2024, 30(9): 20-24. |
QU Y, MA W, LIU X T, et al.. Effects of planting density and spraying ethylene on soybean yield and quality [J]. Anhui Agric. Sci. Bull., 2024, 30(9): 20-24. | |
[25] | 梁木华,韦一,陈家琦,等.不同形态镁肥对生菜生长发育及品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2024(6): 1-14. |
LIANG M H, WEI Y, CHEN J Q, et al.. Effect of different forms of magnesium on the growth, development and quality of lettuce [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2024(6): 1-14. | |
[26] | 雷虎,江晓东,张建取.高温高湿环境下调亏灌溉对番茄叶片光合和衰老特性的影响[J].中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(3): 58-63. |
LEI H, JIANG X D, ZHANG J Q. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on photosynthetic and senescence characteristics of tomato leaves under high temperature and high relative humidity environment in summer [J]. China Cucurbits Veg., 2023, 36(3): 58-63. | |
[27] | 刘群龙,王朵,吴国良,等.硒对酥梨叶片衰老及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].园艺学报, 2011, 38(11): 2059-2066. |
LIU Q L, WANG D, WU G L, et al.. Effects of selenium on leaf senescence and antioxidase system in Pyrus bretschneider ‘Dangshan suli’ [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2011, 38(11): 2059-2066. | |
[28] | 王宇航,李斗,王春恒,等.褪黑素对葡萄叶片发育衰老过程中亚细胞活性氧代谢的影响[J].园艺学报,2024,51(1): 103-120. |
WANG Y H, LI D, WANG C H, et al.. The effect of melatonin on the subcellular reactive oxygen species metabolism during development and senescence in grape leaves [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2024, 51(1): 103-120. | |
[29] | 刘新甜,彭剑涛,张琳,等.乙烯利对烟草离体叶圆片衰老相关生理指标的影响[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,34(4): 12-15. |
LIU X T, PENG J T, ZHANG L, et al.. Effect of ethephon on senescence related physiological indexes of leaf discs [J]. J. Guizhou Univ. Nat. Sci., 2017, 34(4): 12-15. | |
[30] | 王永章,张大鹏.乙烯对成熟期新红星苹果果实碳水化合物代谢的调控[J].园艺学报, 2000, 27(6): 391-395. |
WANG Y Z, ZHANG D P. Regulating effects of ethylene on carbohydrate metabolism in ‘Starkrimson’ apple fruit during the ripening period [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2000, 27(6): 391-395. | |
[31] | 齐红岩,刘洋,刘海涛.水分亏缺对番茄叶片气孔特性及叶绿体超微结构的影响[J].西北植物学报, 2009, 29(1): 9-15. |
QI H Y, LIU Y, LIU H T. Effect of water deficit on stomatal characteristics and ultrastructure of chloroplast in tomato leaves [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2009, 29(1): 9-15. | |
[32] | 吴雪霞,朱月林,朱为民,等.外源一氧化氮对NaCl胁迫下番茄幼苗生理影响[J].中国农业科学, 2006, 39(3): 575-581. |
WU X X, ZHU Y L, ZHU W M, et al.. Physiological effects of exogenous nitric oxide in tomato seedlings under NaCl stress [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2006, 39(3): 575-581. | |
[33] | 孙宏图,刘帮迪,孙静,等.不同剂量红光和乙烯利处理对采后芒果成熟及活性氧代谢的影响[J].保鲜与加工, 2024 (6):1-17. |
SUN H T, LIU B D, SUN J, et al.. Different doses of red light and ethephon treatment on postharvest mango ripening and reactive oxygen metabolism [J]. Storage Process, 2024 (6): 1-17. | |
[34] | VANACKER H. Roles for redox regulation in leaf senescence of pea plants grown on different sources of nitrogen nutrition [J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2006, 57(8): 1735-1745. |
[35] | 杨国慧,李红霞,韩德果,等.乙烯对树莓果实成熟软化的影响[J].东北农业大学学报, 2019, 50(3): 35-43. |
YANG G H, LI H X, HAN D G, et al.. Effect of ethylene on ripening and softening of raspberry fruit [J]. J. Northeast Agric. Univ., 2019, 50(3): 35-43. | |
[36] | 张宏涛,吉雪花.乙烯利对线椒果实成熟的影响[J].吉林蔬菜, 2009(1): 70-72. |
[1] | Caixia LYU, Yongfu LI, Huinan XIN, Na LI, Ning LAI, Qinglong GENG, Shuhuang CHEN. Effects of Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield of Winter Wheat and Soil Nitrate/Ammonium Nitrogen Under Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(8): 179-186. |
[2] | Qi ZHOU, Qiang LIU, Jing ZHANG, Chaochao DENG, Zhenlong WANG, Yang LIU, Fang WU, Hao CHANG, Yanfang ZHOU, Cuicui SU, Zhiguo SHI, Zhengrui GAO, Fengjie MA. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Soil Biological Characteristics of Pumpkin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 190-203. |
[3] | Shichao CHEN, Ju WANG, Fuqiang GUO, Rui HAO, Jianping SHI. Effects of Different Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Physiological Indexes and Yield of Protein Mulberry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 240-249. |
[4] | Lijun DUAN, Xianhua DING, Weiqin LI, Shuangdui YAN. Investigation of Co-pyrolysis Behavior and Pyrolysis Product Analysis of Oak Bark and Corn Stalks [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 164-172. |
[5] | Guiqian ZHANG, Li ZHANG, Qian WANG, Caiyun LIU. Effect of Astragalus Polysaccharides on Colony Development and Honey Production in Honeybees [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 72-80. |
[6] | Yan WU, Leping ZOU, Huijie SONG, Dandan HU, Kailou LIU, Wanli LIANG. Effect of Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined Urea on Ammonium Nitrogen of Surface Water and Early Rice Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 192-200. |
[7] | Darong LI, Xiaoling LI, Wuxian ZHOU, Meide ZHANG, Xiaogang JIANG, Jinwen YOU, Hua WANG. Effects of Partial Substitution of Chemical Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer on Growth and Soil Properties of Fritillaria hupehensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 216-226. |
[8] | Junya DUAN, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Tingting WANG, Jianyu WEI, Zheng WANG, Dexun WANG, Juan LI, Hongzhi SHI. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Polyaspartic Acid on Nitrogen Utilization, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 227-238. |
[9] | Qiang WU, Conglian WU, Xiaoyun WU, Jian WU, Xuanmei XU, Junsheng LAI, Weiyun HU, Bangchu GONG, Xibing JIANG. Effect of Different Fertilization Treatments on Yield and Fruit Quality of Castanea henryi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 228-237. |
[10] | Yumang ZHANG, Guijuan CHEN, Hongyan CHANG, Yongheng WANG, Shuxia LIU, Yunxiu YING. Effect of New Degradable Soil Water-retaining Agent on Growth and Development of Maize Seedlings Under Water Stress at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 201-210. |
[11] | Tingting LIU, Xiyu HAO, Hui WANG, Jingwen LENG, Shihang GONG, Wei LIU. Correlation Analysis Between Yield and Agronomical Traits of Different Foxtail Millet Varieties in Semi-arid Area of Western Jilin Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 50-60. |
[12] | Wenxuan SHI, Jinfang TAN, Qian ZHANG, Lantao LI, Yilun WANG. Effect of One-off Fertilization on Yield and Nitrogen Fertilizer Efficiency of Summer Maize in Different Ecological Regions [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 193-202. |
[13] | Mei WU, Jinzhu ZHANG, Zhenhua WANG, Jian LIU, Yue WEN, Xuanzhi LI. Effects of Water and Air Interaction on Physiological Growth and Yield of Maize Under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 189-200. |
[14] | Liang SUN, Yi XU, Qin CAI, Jinghao GUO, Can ZHAO, Baowei GUO, Zhipeng XING, Zhongyang HUO, Hongcheng ZHANG, Yajie HU. Research Progress on Effects of Medium and Trace Elements on Yield and Quality of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 9-19. |
[15] | Xianyin SUN, Qiuhuan MU, Yong MI, Guangde LYU, Xiaolei QI, Yingying SUN, Xundong YIN, Ruixia WANG, Ke WU, Zhaoguo QIAN, Yan ZHAO, Minggang GAO. Classification and Evaluation of New Wheat Lines Based on GT Biplot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 14-24. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||