Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 174-182.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0900
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Hao WANG(), Pengjie JIN, Shan GAO, Mingxuan ZHAO, Changai ZHANG(
), Shengdao SHAN
Received:
2022-10-25
Accepted:
2023-12-15
Online:
2024-07-15
Published:
2024-07-12
Contact:
Changai ZHANG
王豪(), 靳鹏杰, 高山, 赵茗轩, 张昌爱(
), 单胜道
通讯作者:
张昌爱
作者简介:
王豪 E-mail: 734856205@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Hao WANG, Pengjie JIN, Shan GAO, Mingxuan ZHAO, Changai ZHANG, Shengdao SHAN. Effect of Additives on Stability Immersed in Water of Biochar Based Long-acting Fertilizer[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 174-182.
王豪, 靳鹏杰, 高山, 赵茗轩, 张昌爱, 单胜道. 辅料添加对生物炭基长效肥浸水稳定性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 174-182.
材料 Material | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total nitrogen | 全磷 Total phosphorus | 全钾 Total potassium |
---|---|---|---|---|
牛粪生物质炭 Cow dung biochar | 52.52 | 1.99 | 1.76 | 2.82 |
牛粪沼渣 Cow dung digestate | 75.62 | 2.07 | 1.64 | 2.48 |
Table 1 Nutrient content of cow dung biochar and digestate
材料 Material | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total nitrogen | 全磷 Total phosphorus | 全钾 Total potassium |
---|---|---|---|---|
牛粪生物质炭 Cow dung biochar | 52.52 | 1.99 | 1.76 | 2.82 |
牛粪沼渣 Cow dung digestate | 75.62 | 2.07 | 1.64 | 2.48 |
处理Treatment | 生石灰Quicklime | 硅酸盐水泥Portland cement | 预胶化淀粉Pregelatinized starch |
---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CK2 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
T1 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
T2 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
T3 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
T4 | 0 | 50 | 50 |
T5 | 50 | 0 | 50 |
T6 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
Table 2 Test treatment scheme
处理Treatment | 生石灰Quicklime | 硅酸盐水泥Portland cement | 预胶化淀粉Pregelatinized starch |
---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CK2 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
T1 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
T2 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
T3 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
T4 | 0 | 50 | 50 |
T5 | 50 | 0 | 50 |
T6 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
Fig. 1 Compressive properties of fertilizer with different auxiliary materialsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Mass loss of fertilizer immersed in water under adding different auxiliary materialsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 7 pH of fertilizer leaching solution with different auxiliary materialsNote:Different lowercase letters in same extraction time indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
原料 Raw material | 牛粪生物质炭 Cow dung biochar | 沼渣 Digestate | 化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 氧化铁 Ferric oxide | 生石灰 Quicklime | 预胶化淀粉 Pregelatinized starch | 硅酸盐水泥 Portland cement |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 8.41±0.10 c | 7.45±0.05 e | 6.41±0.12 f | 7.71±0.05 d | 11.32±0.07 a | 7.84±0.05 g | 10.15±0.04 b |
电导率EC/ (μS·cm-1) | 108.3±3.6 d | 49.3±1.7 f | 596.2±6.9 a | 7.6±3.0 g | 385.7±8.1 b | 15.8±1.3 e | 144.2±2.4 c |
Table 3 pH and EC value of each ingredient
原料 Raw material | 牛粪生物质炭 Cow dung biochar | 沼渣 Digestate | 化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 氧化铁 Ferric oxide | 生石灰 Quicklime | 预胶化淀粉 Pregelatinized starch | 硅酸盐水泥 Portland cement |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 8.41±0.10 c | 7.45±0.05 e | 6.41±0.12 f | 7.71±0.05 d | 11.32±0.07 a | 7.84±0.05 g | 10.15±0.04 b |
电导率EC/ (μS·cm-1) | 108.3±3.6 d | 49.3±1.7 f | 596.2±6.9 a | 7.6±3.0 g | 385.7±8.1 b | 15.8±1.3 e | 144.2±2.4 c |
1 | 王晓醒, 郭雪琦, 冯瑶, 等. 堆肥过程中抗生素和耐药基因消减研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(11): 2383-2394. |
WANG X X, GUO X Q, FENG Y, et al.. Progress of the degradation of antibiotics and the elimination of antibiotic resistance genes [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2021, 40(11):2383-2394. | |
2 | 王丽, 赵惠丽, 赵英. 生物质炭配施木灰对石灰性土壤固碳和微生物群落的影响[J]. 土壤, 2022, 54(2): 320-328. |
WANG L, ZHAO H L, ZHAO Y. Effect of biochar and wood ash addition on calcareous soil carbon sequestration and microbial community [J]. Soils, 2022,54(2):320-328. | |
3 | 刘晓雨, 潘根兴. 生物质炭农业应用与碳中和[J]. 科学,2021, 73(6): 27-29, 4. |
LIU X Y, PAN G X. Application of biochar in agriculture and carbon neutrality [J]. Science, 2021,73(6): 27-29, 4. | |
4 | 黄庆, 刘忠珍, 朱根发, 等. 生物质炭基肥料及作物施用技术研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2021, 48(1): 26-34. |
HUANG Q, LIU Z Z, ZHU G F, et al.. Research progress in biochar-based fertilizer and its application technology for crops [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2021, 48(1): 26-34. | |
5 | YAN T T, XUE J H, ZHOU Z D, et al.. Biochar-based fertilizer amendments improve the soil microbial community structure in a karst mountainous area [J/OL]. Sci.Total Environ., 2021, 794:148757 [2022-09-22]. . |
6 | 任依, 姜培坤, 鲁长根, 等. 炭基肥与有机肥替代部分化肥对青紫泥水稻土微生物丰度及酶活性的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(4): 860-868. |
REN Y, JIANG P K, LU C G, et al.. Effects of biochar-based fertilizer and organic fertilizer substituting chemical fertilizer partially on soil microbial abundances and enzyme activities [J]. J. Zhejiang A&F Univ., 2022, 39(4): 860-868. | |
7 | 张凯, 许跃奇, 王晓强, 等. 炭基肥与化肥配施对植烟土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(4): 95-99. |
ZHANG K, XU Y Q, WANG X Q, et al.. Effects of combined application of biochar-based and inorganic fertilizers on microbiological characteristics in tobacco growing soil [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2022, 34(4): 95-99. | |
8 | LUO H D, ZHU C F, WANG J W, et al.. Effects of different fertilizer types on the yield of camellia oleifera abel and nitrogen utilizalion efficiency [J]. Fresenius Environ. Bull., 2018, 27(11): 7425-7432. |
9 | 唐金成, 张伟, 黎宝鑫. 粮食安全视角的水稻收入保险创新发展研究[J]. 农村金融研究, 2022(5): 47-59. |
TANG J C, ZHANG W, LI B X. Research on innovative development of rice income insurance from the perspective of food security [J]. Rural Finance Res., 2022(5):47-59. | |
10 | 张晨阳, 徐明岗, 王斐, 等. 施用有机肥对我国大豆产量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2023, 25(8): 148-156. |
ZHANG C Y, XU M G, WANG F, et al.. Effects of manure application on soybean yield and soil nutrients in China [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023, 25(8): 148-156. | |
11 | 黄巧义, 吴永沛, 黄旭, 等. 控释尿素与尿素配施对甜玉米产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(2): 163-173. |
HUANG Q Y, WU Y P, HUANG X, et al.. Impact of controlled-release urea combined with conventional urea on yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of spring sweet corn under one-off application [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023, 25(2): 163-173. | |
12 | 徐栋. 长江下游南部地区优质丰产氮高效单季晚熟粳稻品种筛选及一次性施肥研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2022. |
XU D. Screening of single cropping late-maturing japonica rice cultivars with good-quality,high-nitrogen efficiency and one-time nitrogen application research in the southern of lower reaches of Yangtze River [D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2022. | |
13 | 张昌爱, 王豪, 刘万鹏, 等. 一种水田长效肥料及其制备方法: CN112661564A[P]. 2021-04-16. |
14 | 马庆华, 王贵禧, 梁丽松. 质构仪穿刺试验检测冬枣质地品质方法的建立[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(6): 1210-1217. |
MA Q H, WANG G X, LIANG L S. Establishment of the detecting method on the fruit texture of Dongzao by puncture test [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2011, 44(6): 1210-1217. | |
15 | 刘刚, 万连步, 张民, 等. 缓释肥料: [S]. 北京中国标准出版社, 2009. |
16 | 武德凯. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 第4版. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2002: 1-836. |
17 | YANG F, LI Y, HAN Y H, et al.. Performance of mature compost to control gaseous emissions in kitchen waste composting [J]. Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 657:262-269. |
18 | 刘海林, 蔡隽, 杨红竹, 等. 成型压力对棒状复合肥料抗压性能及氮钾养分淋溶特性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(6): 276-281. |
LIU H L, CAI J, YANG H Z, et al.. Effect of forming pressure on the compressive strength,nitrogen and potassium leaching characteristics of compound fertilizer rod [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2021(6): 276-281. | |
19 | 唐玉莹, 陈凌霞, 张燕燕, 等. 水田长效肥的研制及浸水稳定性评价[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2022, 37(4): 8-10. |
TANG Y Y, CHEN L X, ZHANG Y Y, et al.. Development of paddy field long-acting fertilizer and evaluation of its immersion stability [J]. Phos. Comp. Fert., 2022, 37(4): 8-10. | |
20 | 曹巧滢, 詹曜玮, 丁尔全, 等. 分次施用碱性肥料对土壤pH及土壤镉有效性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2022, 41(7):1483-1489. |
CAO Q Y, ZHAN Y W, DING E Q,et al.. Influences of alkaline fertilizer application on soil pH and soil available cadmium [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2022, 41(7): 1483-1489. | |
21 | 郭春铭, 刘卫军, 樊小林.碱性长效缓释氮肥对蕉园土壤pH和香蕉氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(1): 128-136. |
GUO C M, LIU W J, FAN X L. Effect of alkaline slow release nitrogen fertilizer on soil pH and nitrogen use efficiency of banana [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2017, 23(1): 128-136. | |
22 | SUN Y K, ZHAO T N, ZHANG Y, et al.. Response of water-soluble salt accumulation in weathered gneiss spoil substrate to the addition of superabsorbent polymer under a semiarid climate [J]. J. Soil Sediment, 2020, 20(1): 190-203. |
23 | 郭凯, 李红梅, 蒋相国, 等. 基于ArcGIS和模糊数学法的夏花生产区土壤肥力评价——以襄阳市为例[J]. 花生学报,2022, 51(4): 60-69. |
GUO K, LI H M, JIANG X G, et al.. Soil fertility evaluation in Xiangyang summer peanut area based on ArcGIS and fuzzy mathematical method [J]. J. Peanut Sci., 2022, 51(4): 60-69. | |
24 | 唐涛, 王帆帆, 郭杰, 等. 恩施州建南镇黄连病害情况调查及成因分析[J]. 中南农业科技, 2022, 43(6): 81-83. |
25 | 王传林, 刘泽平, 张腾腾, 等. 海水及养护方式对硅酸盐水泥性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(10): 74-80. |
WANG C L, LIU Z P, ZHANG T T, et al.. Influence of seawater and curing conditions on the hydration performance of portland cement [J]. Mater. Rev., 2022, 36(10): 74-80. | |
26 | 陈晓峰, 颜宏, 何晓宇, 等. 不同纤维及掺量对硅酸盐水泥胶砂强度的影响规律[J]. 河南科学, 2020, 38(9): 1440-1447. |
CHEN X F, YAN H, HE X Y, et al.. The influence of different fiber and content on the mortar strength of portland cement [J].Henan Sci., 2020,38(9): 1440-1447. | |
27 | 曹立栋, 王豪, 周健驹, 等. 不同固化剂组配对固化成型肥料浸水稳定性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022,54(4): 107-111. |
CAO L D, WANG H, ZHOU J J, et al.. Effects of different groups of curing agent on soaking stability of fertilizer made by curing method [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2022, 54(4): 107-111. | |
28 | 崔跃, 焦晓升, 张川, 等. 预胶化淀粉在固体制剂中的应用[J]. 中国医药指南, 2011, 9(15): 39-40. |
29 | 刘欢, 张宁, 池慧波. 淀粉类黏合剂黏度曲线的测定[J]. 药物评价研究, 2018, 41(8): 1403-1407. |
LIU H, ZHANG N, CHI H B. Determination of viscosity curve for different starch paste [J]. Drug Evaluat. Res., 2018, 41(8):1403-1407. | |
30 | 原奇, 申向东, 薛慧君, 等. 水泥-生石灰对铬污染土固化效果及微观孔隙特征的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(6): 1141-1148. |
YUAN Q, SHEN X D, XUE H J, et al.. Study on curing effect and micropore characteristics of chromium-polluted soil under the coupling effect of cement and quicklime [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2018,37(6): 1141-1148. |
[1] | Yujing LI, Yuqing FENG, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Hongzhi SHI. Review of Absorption and Utilization of Different Nitrogen Forms and Their Effects on Plant Physiological Metabolism [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 128-139. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||