Effects of 3 Trellis Systems on Cultivation Characters and Berry Quality of ‘Xinyu’ Grape

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.1069

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to screen and optimize the high quality and high efficiency cultivation trellis system of table grape in the northwest arid area， China，the ‘Xinyu’ grape was used as experimental material， with 3 treatments including single dragon trunk shaping + horizontal leaf curtain （SDTS-H）， inclined single dragon trunk shaping + horizontal leaf curtain （ISDTS-H）， and inclined single dragon trunk shaping + vertical + horizontal leaf curtains （ISDTS-VH） were set，and the effects of 3 trellis systems on leaves photosynthetic characteristics， cluster micro-environment， fruit quality and economic benefits of ‘Xinyu’ grape were analyzed. The results showed that the net photosynthetic rate was higher with ISDTS-VH than with SDTS-H by 7.73%， the water use efficiency was higher with ISDTS-H than with SDTS-H by 14.13%. Compared with SDTS-H， mean temperature with ISDTS-H and ISDTS-VH were higher than that with ISDTS-VH with 2.29 and 2.24 ℃， mean humidity were lower with ISDTS-H and ISDTS-VH than with ISDTS-VH by 4.96 and 3.85 percentage points， respectively. The daily average total radiation with ISDTS-H and ISDTS-VH were 2.66 and 1.31 times compared with SDTS-H. Grapes with ISDTS-H and ISDTS-VH ripened earlier than with SDTS-H， and the contents of soluble solids， anthocyanin， flavonoid， vitamin C and color index of red grape were significantly higher with ISDTS-H and ISDTS-VH fruits than with SDTS-H when berry ripening. The berry mass， flavonoid content and vitamin C content of SDTS-VH were the highest by 13.99 g， 7.36 and 44.18 mg·kg^-1， respectively， and the anthocyanin content was 1.22 mg·g^-1 at the later stage of fruit ripen， the fruit quality was the best. Actual number of clusters similarity index and actual yield similarity index of SDTS-VH were the highest， with 0.73 and 1.06. Compared with SDTS-H， the cumulative hours with ISDTS-VH was reduced by 48.00% and the economic performance increased by 189.58%. Taken together， photosynthetic rate of ISDTS-VH was the highest， cluster micro-environment was the optimal， beneficial to quality formation and yield control， and economic performance was the highest.

Key words: trellis system, ‘Xinyu’ grape, micro-environment, cultivation characteristics, berry quality

摘要：

为筛选及优化西北干旱区鲜食葡萄优质高效栽培架式，以‘新郁’葡萄为试验材料，设置独龙干+水平叶幕（SDTS-H）、顺行龙干+水平叶幕（ISDTS-H）和顺行龙干+V+水平叶幕（ISDTS-VH）3种栽培架式，分析其对‘新郁’葡萄叶片光合特性、果穗微域环境、果实品质及经济效益的影响。结果表明，相比SDTS-H，ISDTS-VH叶片净光合速率提高7.73%，ISDTS-H水分利用效率提高14.13%；ISDTS-H、ISDTS-VH比SDTS-H果穗微域环境平均温度分别升高2.29 和2.24 ℃，平均湿度分别减小4.96和3.85个百分点，日均总辐射分别为SDTS-H的2.66和1.31倍；ISDTS-H、ISDTS-VH葡萄较SDTS-H早熟，成熟期果实可溶性固形物、花色苷、类黄酮、维生素C含量及葡萄果实色泽指数均显著高于SDTS-H，SDTS-VH果实成熟后期果粒质量最大，为13.99 g，类黄酮和维生素C含量最高，分别为7.36和44.18 mg·kg^-1，且具有适度的花色苷含量（1.22 mg·g^-1），综合品质最好；SDTS-VH实际果穗数、实际产量与目标值相似指数最高，分别为0.73和1.06；ISDTS-VH相比传统SDTS-H，累计工时投入减少48.00%，经济效益提高189.58%。综上所述，ISDTS-VH栽培的‘新郁’葡萄叶片光合速率最高，果穗微域环境最优，利于品质形成和产量控制，栽培经济效益最高。

关键词: 架式, ‘新郁’葡萄, 微域环境, 栽培特性, 果实品质

CLC Number:

S663.1

Shijian BAI, Jinge HU, Chao LI, Junshe CAI. Effects of 3 Trellis Systems on Cultivation Characters and Berry Quality of ‘Xinyu’ Grape[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 63-73.

白世践, 户金鸽, 李超, 蔡军社. 3种架式对‘新郁’葡萄栽培性状及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 63-73.

Figures/Tables 7

References 41

1	刘凤之.中国葡萄栽培现状与发展趋势[J].落叶果树,2017,49(1):1-4.
2	张大鹏,姜红英,陈星黎,等. 叶幕PAR光能截留和分配对葡萄群体光合同化物库源关系的调控[J].植物生态学报,1995,19(4): 302-310.
	ZHANG D P, JIANG H Y, CHEN X L . et al .. Regulating effects of canopy light (PAR) interception and distribution on photosynthate ‘sink-source’ relation in grapevine population with different canopy structures [J]. Chin. J. Plant Ecol., 1995, 19(4): 302-310.
3	刘笑宏,孙永江,孙红,等.不同叶幕类型对‘摩尔多瓦’葡萄果穗微域环境及果实品质的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2016, 49(21): 4246-4254.
	LIU X H, SUN Y J, SUN H, et al.. Effect of canopy types on the cluster micro-environment and fruit quality of the ‘Moldova’ grapes [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2016, 49(21): 4246-4254.
4	TROUGHT M C T, NAYLOR A P, FRAMPTON C. Effect of row orientation, trellis type, shoot and bunch position on the variability of Sauvignon Blanc (Vitis vinifera L.) juice composition [J]. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 2017, 23: 240-250.
5	王晓玥,张国军,孙磊,等. 2种架式对3个鲜食葡萄品种栽培性状及果实品质的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2019,52(7):1150-1163.
	WANG X Y, ZHANG G J, SUN L, et al.. Effects of two trellis systems on viticultural characteristics and fruit quality of three table grape cultivars [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2019,52(7):1150-1163.
6	WOLF T K, DRY P R, ILAND P G, et al.. Response of Shiraz grapevines to five different training systems in the Barossa Valley, Australia [J]. Aus. J. Grape Wine Res., 2003, 9: 82-95.
7	TROUGHT M C T, NAYLOR A P, FRAMPTON C. Effect of row orientation, trellis type, shoot and bunch position on the variability of Sauvignon Blanc (Vitis vinifera L.) juice composition [J]. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 2017, 23: 240-250.
8	单守明,杨恕玲,王振平,等.不同架式对设施葡萄生长发育和主芽坏死的影响[J].北方园艺,2011(2): 51-53.
	SHAN S M, YANG S L, WANG Z P, et al.. Effects of different training structures on the grape development and bud abortion in greenhouse [J]. Northern Hortic., 2011(2): 51-53.
9	冀晓昊,刘凤之,史祥宾,等.架式和新梢间距对‘巨峰’葡萄果实品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(7):1164-1172.
	JI X H, LIU F Z, SHI X B, et al.. The effects of different training systems and shoot spacing on the fruit quality of ‘Kyoho’ grape [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2019,52(7):1164-1172.
10	史祥宾,刘凤之,程存刚,等.不同叶幕形对设施葡萄叶幕微环境、叶片质量及果实品质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(12):3730-3736.
	SHI X B, LIU F Z, CHENG C G, et al.. Effects of canopy shapes of grape on canopy microenvironment, leaf and fruit quality in greenhouse [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2015, 26(12): 3730-3736.
11	ZHANG F C, ZHONG H X, ZHOU X M, et al.. Photosynthesis of grape leaves with ‘OSC’ trellis and cordon based on data model fitting [J]. Photosynthetica, 2021,59:160-170.
12	骆强伟,孙峰,蔡军社,等.葡萄新品种“新郁”[J].园艺学报,2007,34(3):797.
	LUO Q W, SUN F, CAI J S, et al.. A new grape cultivar ‘Xinyu’ [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2007, 34(3): 797.
13	贾杨,廖康,骆强伟,等.无核白葡萄不同栽培架式叶幕微气候及产量品质差异分析[J].新疆农业科学,2016,53(7):1210-1216.
	JIA Y, LIAO K, LUO Q W, et al.. Analysis on the canopy microclimate and yield and quality of the different grape cultivation trellis in Turpan [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2016, 53(7): 1210-1216.
14	AMIRI M E, FALLAHI E, PARSEH S. Application of ethephon and ABA at 40% veraison advanced maturity and quality of ‘Beidaneh Ghermez’ grape [J]. Acta Hortic., 2010, 884: 371-377.
15	中华人民共和国国家健康委员会,国家市场监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中总酸的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021.
16	高俊凤.植物生理学指导[Ｍ].北京:高等教育出版,2006:203-204.
17	MEYERS K J, WATKINS C B, PRITTS M P, et al.. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of strawberries [J]. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2003, 51(23):6887-6892.
18	WELLBURM A R. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolutions [J]. J. Plant Physiol., 1994, 144: 307-313.
19	ORAK H H. Total antioxidant activities, phenolics, anthocyanins, polyphenoloxidase activities of selected red grape cultivars and their correlations [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2007, 111(3): 235-241.
20	张付春,潘明启,伍新宇,等.葡萄埋土防寒区水平棚架“顺沟倾斜龙干”树形研究初报[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(5): 69-74.
	ZHANG F C, PAN M Q, WU X Y, et al.. Preliminary research on single cordon obliquely along the ditch of grape in cold areas [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2015, 33(5): 69-74.
21	CORTÁZAR V G, CÓRDOVA C, PINTO M. Canopy structure and photosynthesis modelling of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana) grown on an overhead (parronal) trellis system in Chile [J]. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 2005, 11(3): 328-338.
22	张洁,杨伟伟,容新民,等.构建不同树形葡萄树体结构的三维虚拟模型[J].新疆农业科学,2021,58(2): 265-275.
	ZHANG J, YANG W W, RONG X M, et al.. Digital study on the canopy structure of grape with different tree shapes [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2021, 58(2): 265-275.
23	FARQUHAR G D, EHLERINGER J R, HUBICKKT. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis [J]. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 2003, 40(1):503-537.
24	许大全.光合作用气孔限制分析中的一些问题[J].植物生理学通讯,1997,33(4):241-244.
	XU D Q. Some problems in stomatal limitation analysis of photosynthesis [J]. Plant Physiol. Commun., 1997, 33(4):241-244.
25	GARDEA A A, NORIEGA J R, OROZCO J A, et al.. Advanced maturity of ‘Perlette’ table grapes by training systems which increase foliage exposure to sunlight [J]. Rev. Fitotec. Mex., 2008, 31(1): 27-33.
26	潘明启,张付春,钟海霞,等.北方葡萄水平棚架“顺沟高厂”树形的高光效、省力化评价[J].果树学报,2017,34(9):1134-1143.
	PAN M Q, ZHANG F C, ZHONG H X, et al.. Evaluation of photosynthetic efficiency and labor cost in cultivation of grape with an “oblique single cordon along ditch” trellis type in northern China [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2017,34(9): 1134-1143.
27	张大鹏,姜红英.叶幕微气候与葡萄生理、产量和品质形成之间的基本关系研究[J].园艺学报,1995,22 (2):110-116.
	ZHANG D P, JIANG H Y. Studies on the essential relationship between canopy microclimate,vine growth,grape yield and berry quality [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 1995, 22(2):110-116.
28	问亚琴,张艳芳,潘秋红.葡萄果实有机酸的研究进展[J].海南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,27(3):302-307.
	WEN Y Q, ZHANG Y F, PAN Q H. The research progress of grapefruit organic acids [J]. J. Hainan Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2009, 27(3): 302-307.
29	BERGQVIST J, DOKOOZLIAN N K, EBISUDA N. Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the Central San Joaquin Valley in California [J/OL]. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 2001, 52(1):1 [2022-11-06]. .
30	CONDE C, SILVA P, FONTES N, et al.. Biochemical changes throughout grape berry development and fruit and wine quality [J]. Structure, 2007, l: l-22.
31	ALJIBURY F, BREWER R, CHRISTENSEN P. Grape response to cooling with sprinklers [J]. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 1975, 26: 214-217.
32	刘洪波,白云岗,张江辉,等.不同微喷弥雾调控方式下微气候因子对极端干旱区葡萄果实生长及糖度的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(4):159-167.
	LIU H B, BAI Y G, ZHANG J H, et al.. Effects of microclimate factors on grape fruit growth and sugar content in extreme arid regions under different micro spray mist control [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2020, 38(4): 159-167.
33	CARAVIA L, PAGAY V, COLLINS C, et al.. Application of sprinkler cooling within the bunch zone during ripening of Cabernet Sauvignon berries to reduce the impact of high temperature [J]. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 2017, 23: 48-57.
34	蔡军社,白世践.吐鲁番地区‘火焰无核’葡萄顺架龙干式栽培示范及效益分析[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2018(5):45-48.
	CAI J S, BAI S J. Inclined trunk with same row direction cultivation demonstration and benefit analysis of ‘Flame Seedless’ grapevine in Turpan region [J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine Wine, 2018(5): 45-48.
35	CASTELLARIN S D, GASPERO G D, MARCONI R, et al.. Colour variation in red grapevines (Vitis Vinifera L .): organisationgenomic, expression of flavonoid 3'-hydroxylase, flavonoid 3',5'-hydroxylase genes and related metabolite profiling of red cyanidin-/blue delphinidin-based anthocyanins in berry skin [J/OL]. BMC Genomics, 2006, 7:12[2022-11-06]. .
36	AZUMAA, YAKUSHIJI H, KOSHITA Y, et al.. Flavonoid biosynthesis-related genes in grape skin are differentially regulated by temperature and light conditions [J].Planta,2012, 236(4):1067-1080.
37	MARTINEZ-LUSCHER J, CHEN C C L, BRILLANTE L, et al.. Partial solar radiation exclusion with color shade nets reduces the degradation of organic acids and flavonoids of grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) [J]. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2017, 15: 10693-10702.
38	TORRES N, MARTINEZ-LUSCHER J, PORTE E, et al.. Impacts of leaf removal and shoot thinning on cumulative daily light intensity and thermal time and their cascading effects of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) berry and wine chemistry in warm climates [J/OL]. Food Chem., 2020, 343:128447 [2022-11-06]. .
39	MORI K, SUGAYA S, GEMMA H. Decreased anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berries grown under elevated night temperature condition [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2015, 105 (3):319-330.
40	MOVAHED N, PASTORE C, CELLINI A, et al.. The grapevine VviPrx31 peroxidase as a candidate gene involved in anthocyanin degradation in ripening berries under high temperature [J]. J. Plant Res., 2016, 129: 513-526.
41	SPAYD S E, TARARA J M, MEE D L, et al.. Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot berries [J]. Am. J. Enol. Vitic.,2002, 53(3):171-182.

参数 Parameter	栽培架式 Cultivation trellis system
参数 Parameter	SDTS-H	ISDTS-H	ISDTS-VH
平均最高温 Average maximum temperature/℃	37.05	37.01	36.90
平均最低温 Average minimum temperature/℃	16.02	18.79	18.74
平均温度 Average temperature/℃	25.40	27.69	27.64
平均温差 Average temperature difference/℃	20.65	18.23	18.16
超过35 ℃温差总和 Sum of temperature difference above 35 ℃/℃	234.50	215.00	209.00
≥35 ℃高温时长 Time of temperature above 35 ℃/h	254.00	349.50	343.00
平均最大湿度 Average maximum humidity/%	78.18	65.65	66.78
平均最小湿度 Average minimum humidity/%	21.25	26.52	27.47
平均湿度 Average humidity/%	48.56	43.60	44.71
≤45%低湿时长 Sum of humidity difference below 45%/h	919.50	1 046.00	980.00
日均叶幕透射辐射 Daily average PAR_tran/（µmol·m^-2·s^-1）	2.37	9.29	4.17
日均土壤反射辐射 Daily average PAR_soil/（µmol·m^-2·s^-1）	4.29	8.48	5.61
日均总辐射 Daily average total radiation/（µmol·m^-2·s^-1）	6.67	17.77	9.78

参数 Parameter	栽培架式 Cultivation trellis system
参数 Parameter	SDTS-H	ISDTS-H	ISDTS-VH
平均最高温 Average maximum temperature/℃	37.05	37.01	36.90
平均最低温 Average minimum temperature/℃	16.02	18.79	18.74
平均温度 Average temperature/℃	25.40	27.69	27.64
平均温差 Average temperature difference/℃	20.65	18.23	18.16
超过35 ℃温差总和 Sum of temperature difference above 35 ℃/℃	234.50	215.00	209.00
≥35 ℃高温时长 Time of temperature above 35 ℃/h	254.00	349.50	343.00
平均最大湿度 Average maximum humidity/%	78.18	65.65	66.78
平均最小湿度 Average minimum humidity/%	21.25	26.52	27.47
平均湿度 Average humidity/%	48.56	43.60	44.71
≤45%低湿时长 Sum of humidity difference below 45%/h	919.50	1 046.00	980.00
日均叶幕透射辐射 Daily average PAR_tran/（µmol·m^-2·s^-1）	2.37	9.29	4.17
日均土壤反射辐射 Daily average PAR_soil/（µmol·m^-2·s^-1）	4.29	8.48	5.61
日均总辐射 Daily average total radiation/（µmol·m^-2·s^-1）	6.67	17.77	9.78

栽培架式 Cultivation trellis system	果穗质量 Cluster mass/g	实际果穗数 Actual number of clusters/（10⁴·hm^-2）	目标果穗数Objective number of clusters/（10⁴·hm^-2）	实际产量 Actual yield/ （t·hm^-2）	目标产量 Objective yield/（t·hm^-2）	相似指数 Similarity index
栽培架式 Cultivation trellis system	果穗质量 Cluster mass/g	实际果穗数 Actual number of clusters/（10⁴·hm^-2）	目标果穗数Objective number of clusters/（10⁴·hm^-2）	实际产量 Actual yield/ （t·hm^-2）	目标产量 Objective yield/（t·hm^-2）	果穗数Number of clusters	产量Yield
SDTS-H	1 175.32±173.11 a	2.48±0.16 a	3.75	29.10±3.37 a	30.02	0.66	0.97
ISDTS-H	861.25±34.56 b	1.82±0.13 c	2.86	15.63±1.14 c	22.87	0.64	0.68
ISDTS-VH	1 172.38±58.27 a	2.07±0.14 b	2.86	24.30±1.84 b	22.87	0.73	1.06

栽培架式 Cultivation trellis system	果穗质量 Cluster mass/g	实际果穗数 Actual number of clusters/（10⁴·hm^-2）	目标果穗数Objective number of clusters/（10⁴·hm^-2）	实际产量 Actual yield/ （t·hm^-2）	目标产量 Objective yield/（t·hm^-2）	相似指数 Similarity index
栽培架式 Cultivation trellis system	果穗质量 Cluster mass/g	实际果穗数 Actual number of clusters/（10⁴·hm^-2）	目标果穗数Objective number of clusters/（10⁴·hm^-2）	实际产量 Actual yield/ （t·hm^-2）	目标产量 Objective yield/（t·hm^-2）	果穗数Number of clusters	产量Yield
SDTS-H	1 175.32±173.11 a	2.48±0.16 a	3.75	29.10±3.37 a	30.02	0.66	0.97
ISDTS-H	861.25±34.56 b	1.82±0.13 c	2.86	15.63±1.14 c	22.87	0.64	0.68
ISDTS-VH	1 172.38±58.27 a	2.07±0.14 b	2.86	24.30±1.84 b	22.87	0.73	1.06

参数 Parameter	栽培架式 Cultivation trellis system
参数 Parameter	SDTS-H	ISDTS-H	ISDTS-VH
顶端优势 Apical dominance	较明显 Obvious	不明显 Not obvious	不明显 Not obvious
主蔓高度 Main vine setting height/cm	190	190	150
结果带高度 Fruit setting height/cm	180	180	160
疏果工时 Fruit thinning hours/（h·hm^-2）	480	360	240
新梢绑缚工时 Fruit branch binding hours/（h·hm^-2）	480	480	360
夏季修剪工时 Summer pruning hours/（h·hm^-2）	300	60	60
上、下架工时 Tying and untying hours/（h·hm^-2）	240	120	120
累计工时 Cumulative hours/（h·hm^-2）	1 500	1 020	780
商品率 Commodity rate/%	60~70	90	90
经济效益/（10⁴元·hm^-2） Economic performance/（10⁴ yuan·hm^-2）	5.47	8.04	15.84