Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 143-153.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0461
• FOOD QUALITY & PROCESSING AND STORAGE • Previous Articles
Yupeng LIU1(), Fang CHEN1, Shuhong GU1(
), Fang WANG2
Received:
2022-05-31
Accepted:
2022-09-24
Online:
2023-11-15
Published:
2023-11-20
Contact:
Shuhong GU
通讯作者:
古书鸿
作者简介:
刘宇鹏E-mail:895965658@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Yupeng LIU, Fang CHEN, Shuhong GU, Fang WANG. Evaluation of Nutritional Composition and Quality of Phallus impudicus L. from Different Producing Areas in Guizhou[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(11): 143-153.
刘宇鹏, 陈芳, 古书鸿, 王芳. 贵州不同产地冬荪营养成分及品质评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(11): 143-153.
氨基酸种类 Amino acid species | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | 平均值 Average | 变异系数 CV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
必需氨基酸 EAA | 苏氨酸 Thr | 0.37±0.02 b | 0.30±0.02 c | 0.31±0.02 c | 0.66±0.02 a | 0.41 | 37.71 |
缬氨酸 Val | 0.66±0.02 c | 0.73±0.02 b | 0.57±0.02 d | 0.87±0.04 a | 0.71 | 16.53 | |
蛋氨酸 Met | 0.87±0.02 c | 0.84±0.02 c | 0.97±0.02 b | 1.07±0.04 a | 0.94 | 10.21 | |
异亮氨酸 Ile | 0.46±0.02 c | 0.43±0.02 c | 0.55±0.03 b | 0.77±0.02 a | 0.55 | 25.14 | |
亮氨酸 Leu | 0.86±0.03 d | 0.95±0.04 c | 1.09±0.02 b | 1.24±0.04 a | 1.03 | 14.82 | |
苯丙氨酸 Phe | 0.72±0.06 b | 0.86±0.04 a | 0.69±0.03 b | 0.50±0.03 c | 0.69 | 20.21 | |
赖氨酸 Lys | 0.31±0.02 c | 0.25±0.03 d | 0.36±0.02 b | 0.45±0.02 a | 0.34 | 23.35 | |
总量 Total | 4.24±0.11 c | 4.36±0.09 c | 4.55±0.02 b | 5.55±0.09 a | 4.68 | 11.67 | |
非必需氨基酸 NEAA | 天冬氨酸 Asp | 1.25±0.05 b | 1.24±0.02 b | 1.39±0.04 a | 1.33±0.03 a | 1.30 | 5.51 |
丝氨酸 Ser | 0.62±0.02 a | 0.46±0.03 c | 0.64±0.04 a | 0.55±0.03 b | 0.57 | 13.56 | |
谷氨酸 Glu | 1.66±0.02 b | 1.27±0.02 d | 1.39±0.03 c | 1.88±0.04 a | 1.55 | 16.22 | |
甘氨酸 Gly | 0.47±0.02 b | 0.45±0.02 b | 0.39±0.01 c | 0.55±0.02 a | 0.46 | 13.58 | |
丙氨酸 Ala | 0.57±0.02 c | 0.89±0.02 a | 0.64±0.02 b | 0.87±0.02 a | 0.74 | 19.91 | |
胱氨酸 Cys | 0.17±0.02 b | 0.12±0.01 c | 0.25±0.03 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 0.19 | 30.11 | |
酪氨酸 Tyr | 0.33±0.05 b | 0.54±0.05 a | 0.26±0.03 c | 0.24±0.02 c | 0.34 | 37.00 | |
组氨酸 His | 0.32±0.01 b | 0.23±0.02 c | 0.27±0.02 c | 0.36±0.03 a | 0.29 | 18.47 | |
精氨酸 Arg | 0.47±0.04 d | 0.56±0.02 c | 0.78±0.02 a | 0.70±0.02 b | 0.63 | 20.38 | |
脯氨酸 Pro | 0.62±0.02 ab | 0.59±0.03 b | 0.44±0.03 c | 0.65±0.04 a | 0.57 | 15.59 | |
总量 Total | 6.46±0.03 b | 6.35±0.14 b | 6.44±0.12 b | 7.37±0.08 a | 6.66 | 6.59 | |
总氨基酸 TAA | 10.70±0.09 c | 10.71±0.11 c | 10.99±0.10 b | 12.93±0.16 a | 11.33 | 8.59 | |
必需氨基酸/总氨基酸 EAA/TAA | 39.61±0.73 c | 40.73±0.93 bc | 41.42±0.54 b | 42.96±0.27 a | 41.18 | 3.51 | |
必需氨基酸/非必需氨基酸 EAA/NEAA | 65.61±1.98 c | 68.75±2.63 bc | 70.71±1.57 b | 75.32±0.81 a | 70.10 | 5.72 | |
鲜味氨基酸 DAA | 4.41±0.06 c | 4.41±0.04 c | 4.58±0.00 b | 5.34±0.02 a | 4.68 | 8.57 | |
药效氨基酸 PAA | 7.10±0.07 c | 7.08±0.09 c | 7.58±0.01 b | 7.99±0.44 a | 7.43 | 5.90 |
Table 1 Composition and content of amino acid from different producing area Phallus impudicus L.
氨基酸种类 Amino acid species | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | 平均值 Average | 变异系数 CV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
必需氨基酸 EAA | 苏氨酸 Thr | 0.37±0.02 b | 0.30±0.02 c | 0.31±0.02 c | 0.66±0.02 a | 0.41 | 37.71 |
缬氨酸 Val | 0.66±0.02 c | 0.73±0.02 b | 0.57±0.02 d | 0.87±0.04 a | 0.71 | 16.53 | |
蛋氨酸 Met | 0.87±0.02 c | 0.84±0.02 c | 0.97±0.02 b | 1.07±0.04 a | 0.94 | 10.21 | |
异亮氨酸 Ile | 0.46±0.02 c | 0.43±0.02 c | 0.55±0.03 b | 0.77±0.02 a | 0.55 | 25.14 | |
亮氨酸 Leu | 0.86±0.03 d | 0.95±0.04 c | 1.09±0.02 b | 1.24±0.04 a | 1.03 | 14.82 | |
苯丙氨酸 Phe | 0.72±0.06 b | 0.86±0.04 a | 0.69±0.03 b | 0.50±0.03 c | 0.69 | 20.21 | |
赖氨酸 Lys | 0.31±0.02 c | 0.25±0.03 d | 0.36±0.02 b | 0.45±0.02 a | 0.34 | 23.35 | |
总量 Total | 4.24±0.11 c | 4.36±0.09 c | 4.55±0.02 b | 5.55±0.09 a | 4.68 | 11.67 | |
非必需氨基酸 NEAA | 天冬氨酸 Asp | 1.25±0.05 b | 1.24±0.02 b | 1.39±0.04 a | 1.33±0.03 a | 1.30 | 5.51 |
丝氨酸 Ser | 0.62±0.02 a | 0.46±0.03 c | 0.64±0.04 a | 0.55±0.03 b | 0.57 | 13.56 | |
谷氨酸 Glu | 1.66±0.02 b | 1.27±0.02 d | 1.39±0.03 c | 1.88±0.04 a | 1.55 | 16.22 | |
甘氨酸 Gly | 0.47±0.02 b | 0.45±0.02 b | 0.39±0.01 c | 0.55±0.02 a | 0.46 | 13.58 | |
丙氨酸 Ala | 0.57±0.02 c | 0.89±0.02 a | 0.64±0.02 b | 0.87±0.02 a | 0.74 | 19.91 | |
胱氨酸 Cys | 0.17±0.02 b | 0.12±0.01 c | 0.25±0.03 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 0.19 | 30.11 | |
酪氨酸 Tyr | 0.33±0.05 b | 0.54±0.05 a | 0.26±0.03 c | 0.24±0.02 c | 0.34 | 37.00 | |
组氨酸 His | 0.32±0.01 b | 0.23±0.02 c | 0.27±0.02 c | 0.36±0.03 a | 0.29 | 18.47 | |
精氨酸 Arg | 0.47±0.04 d | 0.56±0.02 c | 0.78±0.02 a | 0.70±0.02 b | 0.63 | 20.38 | |
脯氨酸 Pro | 0.62±0.02 ab | 0.59±0.03 b | 0.44±0.03 c | 0.65±0.04 a | 0.57 | 15.59 | |
总量 Total | 6.46±0.03 b | 6.35±0.14 b | 6.44±0.12 b | 7.37±0.08 a | 6.66 | 6.59 | |
总氨基酸 TAA | 10.70±0.09 c | 10.71±0.11 c | 10.99±0.10 b | 12.93±0.16 a | 11.33 | 8.59 | |
必需氨基酸/总氨基酸 EAA/TAA | 39.61±0.73 c | 40.73±0.93 bc | 41.42±0.54 b | 42.96±0.27 a | 41.18 | 3.51 | |
必需氨基酸/非必需氨基酸 EAA/NEAA | 65.61±1.98 c | 68.75±2.63 bc | 70.71±1.57 b | 75.32±0.81 a | 70.10 | 5.72 | |
鲜味氨基酸 DAA | 4.41±0.06 c | 4.41±0.04 c | 4.58±0.00 b | 5.34±0.02 a | 4.68 | 8.57 | |
药效氨基酸 PAA | 7.10±0.07 c | 7.08±0.09 c | 7.58±0.01 b | 7.99±0.44 a | 7.43 | 5.90 |
必需氨基酸 Essential amino acid | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | FAO/WHO模式值 FAO/WHO model value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
苏氨酸 Thr | 3.46 | 2.80 | 2.82 | 5.10 | 4.0 |
缬氨酸 Val | 6.17 | 6.82 | 5.19 | 6.73 | 5.0 |
蛋氨酸+胱氨酸 Met+Cys | 9.72 | 8.96 | 11.10 | 10.05 | 3.5 |
异亮氨酸 Ile | 4.30 | 4.01 | 5.00 | 5.96 | 4.0 |
亮氨酸 Leu | 8.04 | 8.87 | 9.92 | 9.59 | 7.0 |
苯丙氨酸+酪氨酸 Phe+Tyr | 9.81 | 13.07 | 8.64 | 5.72 | 6.0 |
赖氨酸 Lys | 2.90 | 2.33 | 3.28 | 3.48 | 5.5 |
Table 2 Percentage of essential amino acids in total amino acids of Phallus impudicus L. from different producing area
必需氨基酸 Essential amino acid | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | FAO/WHO模式值 FAO/WHO model value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
苏氨酸 Thr | 3.46 | 2.80 | 2.82 | 5.10 | 4.0 |
缬氨酸 Val | 6.17 | 6.82 | 5.19 | 6.73 | 5.0 |
蛋氨酸+胱氨酸 Met+Cys | 9.72 | 8.96 | 11.10 | 10.05 | 3.5 |
异亮氨酸 Ile | 4.30 | 4.01 | 5.00 | 5.96 | 4.0 |
亮氨酸 Leu | 8.04 | 8.87 | 9.92 | 9.59 | 7.0 |
苯丙氨酸+酪氨酸 Phe+Tyr | 9.81 | 13.07 | 8.64 | 5.72 | 6.0 |
赖氨酸 Lys | 2.90 | 2.33 | 3.28 | 3.48 | 5.5 |
必需氨基酸 Essential amino acid | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAA | RCAA | RAA | RCAA | RAA | RCAA | RAA | RCAA | |
苏氨酸 Thr | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.51 | 0.71 | 0.51 | 1.28 | 0.90 |
缬氨酸 Val | 1.23 | 0.93 | 1.36 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.76 | 1.35 | 0.95 |
蛋氨酸+胱氨酸 Met+Cys | 2.78 | 2.10 | 2.56 | 1.88 | 3.17 | 2.31 | 2.87 | 2.04 |
异亮氨酸 Ile | 1.08 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 1.25 | 0.91 | 1.49 | 1.06 |
亮氨酸 Leu | 1.15 | 0.87 | 1.27 | 0.93 | 1.42 | 1.03 | 1.37 | 0.97 |
苯丙氨酸+酪氨酸 Phe+Tyr | 1.64 | 1.24 | 2.18 | 1.60 | 1.44 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 0.68 |
赖氨酸 Lys | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.60 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.45 |
SRCAA | 45.29 | 43.14 | 37.65 | 50.30 | ||||
EAAI | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.20 | 1.29 |
Table 3 Index of essential amino acids of Phallus impudicus L. from different producing area
必需氨基酸 Essential amino acid | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAA | RCAA | RAA | RCAA | RAA | RCAA | RAA | RCAA | |
苏氨酸 Thr | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.51 | 0.71 | 0.51 | 1.28 | 0.90 |
缬氨酸 Val | 1.23 | 0.93 | 1.36 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.76 | 1.35 | 0.95 |
蛋氨酸+胱氨酸 Met+Cys | 2.78 | 2.10 | 2.56 | 1.88 | 3.17 | 2.31 | 2.87 | 2.04 |
异亮氨酸 Ile | 1.08 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 1.25 | 0.91 | 1.49 | 1.06 |
亮氨酸 Leu | 1.15 | 0.87 | 1.27 | 0.93 | 1.42 | 1.03 | 1.37 | 0.97 |
苯丙氨酸+酪氨酸 Phe+Tyr | 1.64 | 1.24 | 2.18 | 1.60 | 1.44 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 0.68 |
赖氨酸 Lys | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.60 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.45 |
SRCAA | 45.29 | 43.14 | 37.65 | 50.30 | ||||
EAAI | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.20 | 1.29 |
矿质元素 Mineral element | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | 平均值 Average/% | 变异系数 CV/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮N/(g·kg-1) | 18.70±0.64 d | 20.94±0.06 b | 19.72±0.20 c | 22.45±0.58 a | 20.45 | 7.38 |
磷P/(g·kg-1) | 4.20±0.04 b | 3.55±0.05 d | 3.73±0.01 c | 4.83±0.03 a | 4.08 | 12.75 |
钾K/(g·kg-1) | 31.56±0.61 c | 29.63±1.47 c | 39.64±0.87 a | 36.81±0.99 b | 34.41 | 12.41 |
钙Ca/(mg·kg-1) | 508.64±7.50 d | 643.12±16.69 b | 686.89±16.11 a | 575.68±16.34 c | 603.58 | 11.89 |
铜Cu/(mg·kg-1) | 12.37±0.31 d | 16.07±0.73 b | 14.17±0.58 c | 17.54±0.48 a | 15.04 | 13.90 |
铁Fe/(mg·kg-1) | 125.53±4.94 b | 497.54±11.82 a | 119.81±5.75 b | 92.30±3.95 c | 208.80 | 83.68 |
镁Mg/(mg·kg-1) | 1.65±0.06 b | 1.98±0.05 a | 1.55±0.01 c | 1.65±0.06 b | 1.71 | 10.53 |
锌Zn/(mg·kg-1) | 24.84±0.68 c | 33.05±0.62 b | 51.61±1.30 a | 50.96±0.70 a | 40.12 | 30.11 |
Table 4 Contents of mineral elements of Phallus impudicus L. from different producing area
矿质元素 Mineral element | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | 平均值 Average/% | 变异系数 CV/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮N/(g·kg-1) | 18.70±0.64 d | 20.94±0.06 b | 19.72±0.20 c | 22.45±0.58 a | 20.45 | 7.38 |
磷P/(g·kg-1) | 4.20±0.04 b | 3.55±0.05 d | 3.73±0.01 c | 4.83±0.03 a | 4.08 | 12.75 |
钾K/(g·kg-1) | 31.56±0.61 c | 29.63±1.47 c | 39.64±0.87 a | 36.81±0.99 b | 34.41 | 12.41 |
钙Ca/(mg·kg-1) | 508.64±7.50 d | 643.12±16.69 b | 686.89±16.11 a | 575.68±16.34 c | 603.58 | 11.89 |
铜Cu/(mg·kg-1) | 12.37±0.31 d | 16.07±0.73 b | 14.17±0.58 c | 17.54±0.48 a | 15.04 | 13.90 |
铁Fe/(mg·kg-1) | 125.53±4.94 b | 497.54±11.82 a | 119.81±5.75 b | 92.30±3.95 c | 208.80 | 83.68 |
镁Mg/(mg·kg-1) | 1.65±0.06 b | 1.98±0.05 a | 1.55±0.01 c | 1.65±0.06 b | 1.71 | 10.53 |
锌Zn/(mg·kg-1) | 24.84±0.68 c | 33.05±0.62 b | 51.61±1.30 a | 50.96±0.70 a | 40.12 | 30.11 |
营养成分 Nutritional composition | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | 平均值 Average | 变异系数 CV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
灰分 Ash | 5.92±0.10 b | 5.83±0.07 b | 6.27±0.05 a | 6.18±0.06 a | 6.05 | 3.31 |
脂肪 Fat | 0.83±0.02 d | 1.05±0.03 c | 1.24±0.03 b | 1.49±0.01 a | 1.15 | 21.74 |
粗纤维 Crude fiber | 0.34±0.05 b | 0.35±0.02 b | 0.47±0.01 a | 0.25±0.02 c | 0.35 | 25.71 |
总糖 Total sugar | 34.90±0.20 a | 30.50±0.77 b | 28.92±0.24 c | 29.88±0.26 b | 31.05 | 7.79 |
Table 5 Contents of other nutritional compositions of Phallus impudicus L. from different producing area
营养成分 Nutritional composition | 丹寨 DZ | 湄潭 MT | 大方 DF | 德江 DJ | 平均值 Average | 变异系数 CV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
灰分 Ash | 5.92±0.10 b | 5.83±0.07 b | 6.27±0.05 a | 6.18±0.06 a | 6.05 | 3.31 |
脂肪 Fat | 0.83±0.02 d | 1.05±0.03 c | 1.24±0.03 b | 1.49±0.01 a | 1.15 | 21.74 |
粗纤维 Crude fiber | 0.34±0.05 b | 0.35±0.02 b | 0.47±0.01 a | 0.25±0.02 c | 0.35 | 25.71 |
总糖 Total sugar | 34.90±0.20 a | 30.50±0.77 b | 28.92±0.24 c | 29.88±0.26 b | 31.05 | 7.79 |
Fig. 1 Correlation analysis of Phallus impudicus L.quality indexNote:* and ** indicate significant correlation at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively.
指标 Index | 主成分 Principle component | ||
---|---|---|---|
P1 | P2 | P3 | |
灰分 Ash | 0.835 | -0.549 | 0.039 |
脂肪 Fat | 0.873 | 0.038 | 0.486 |
粗纤维 Crude fiber | -0.315 | -0.944 | 0.097 |
总糖 Total sugar | -0.465 | 0.334 | -0.820 |
氮 N | 0.576 | 0.525 | 0.626 |
磷 P | 0.763 | 0.514 | -0.392 |
钾 K | 0.791 | -0.611 | 0.044 |
钙 Ca | 0.011 | -0.610 | 0.792 |
铜 Cu | 0.497 | 0.478 | 0.724 |
铁 Fe | -0.720 | 0.269 | 0.640 |
镁 Mg | -0.640 | 0.532 | 0.554 |
锌 Zn | 0.818 | -0.357 | 0.451 |
天冬氨酸 Asp | 0.718 | -0.679 | 0.153 |
苏氨酸 Thr | 0.824 | 0.561 | -0.084 |
丝氨酸 Ser | 0.319 | -0.653 | -0.687 |
谷氨酸 Glu | 0.717 | 0.469 | -0.516 |
甘氨酸 Gly | 0.491 | 0.860 | -0.134 |
丙氨酸 Ala | 0.163 | 0.591 | 0.790 |
缬氨酸 Val | 0.444 | 0.870 | 0.213 |
胱氨酸 Cys | 0.844 | -0.518 | -0.137 |
蛋氨酸 Met | 0.998 | -0.001 | 0.066 |
异亮氨酸 Ile | 0.973 | 0.221 | 0.074 |
亮氨酸 Leu | 0.918 | 0.020 | 0.395 |
酪氨酸 Tyr | -0.838 | 0.312 | 0.448 |
苯丙氨酸 Phe | -0.961 | -0.149 | 0.233 |
组氨酸 His | 0.738 | 0.366 | -0.566 |
赖氨酸 Lys | 0.992 | 0.042 | -0.116 |
精氨酸 Arg | 0.701 | -0.541 | 0.464 |
脯氨酸 Pro | 0.052 | 0.970 | -0.237 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 14.580 | 8.380 | 6.041 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 50.274 | 28.895 | 20.830 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 50.274 | 79.170 | 100.000 |
Table 6 Principal component analysis of quality index on phallus inpudicus L.
指标 Index | 主成分 Principle component | ||
---|---|---|---|
P1 | P2 | P3 | |
灰分 Ash | 0.835 | -0.549 | 0.039 |
脂肪 Fat | 0.873 | 0.038 | 0.486 |
粗纤维 Crude fiber | -0.315 | -0.944 | 0.097 |
总糖 Total sugar | -0.465 | 0.334 | -0.820 |
氮 N | 0.576 | 0.525 | 0.626 |
磷 P | 0.763 | 0.514 | -0.392 |
钾 K | 0.791 | -0.611 | 0.044 |
钙 Ca | 0.011 | -0.610 | 0.792 |
铜 Cu | 0.497 | 0.478 | 0.724 |
铁 Fe | -0.720 | 0.269 | 0.640 |
镁 Mg | -0.640 | 0.532 | 0.554 |
锌 Zn | 0.818 | -0.357 | 0.451 |
天冬氨酸 Asp | 0.718 | -0.679 | 0.153 |
苏氨酸 Thr | 0.824 | 0.561 | -0.084 |
丝氨酸 Ser | 0.319 | -0.653 | -0.687 |
谷氨酸 Glu | 0.717 | 0.469 | -0.516 |
甘氨酸 Gly | 0.491 | 0.860 | -0.134 |
丙氨酸 Ala | 0.163 | 0.591 | 0.790 |
缬氨酸 Val | 0.444 | 0.870 | 0.213 |
胱氨酸 Cys | 0.844 | -0.518 | -0.137 |
蛋氨酸 Met | 0.998 | -0.001 | 0.066 |
异亮氨酸 Ile | 0.973 | 0.221 | 0.074 |
亮氨酸 Leu | 0.918 | 0.020 | 0.395 |
酪氨酸 Tyr | -0.838 | 0.312 | 0.448 |
苯丙氨酸 Phe | -0.961 | -0.149 | 0.233 |
组氨酸 His | 0.738 | 0.366 | -0.566 |
赖氨酸 Lys | 0.992 | 0.042 | -0.116 |
精氨酸 Arg | 0.701 | -0.541 | 0.464 |
脯氨酸 Pro | 0.052 | 0.970 | -0.237 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 14.580 | 8.380 | 6.041 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 50.274 | 28.895 | 20.830 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 50.274 | 79.170 | 100.000 |
地区 Area | 主成分得分 Principle component score | F:综合得分 Composite score | 排名 Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
德江 DJ | -2.13 | 0.55 | -3.39 | -1.62 | 4 |
湄潭 MT | -3.83 | 1.35 | 2.49 | -1.02 | 3 |
大方 DF | 1.13 | -4.21 | 0.55 | -0.53 | 2 |
丹寨 DZ | 4.83 | 2.30 | 0.36 | 3.17 | 1 |
Table 7 Principle component score and composite score
地区 Area | 主成分得分 Principle component score | F:综合得分 Composite score | 排名 Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
德江 DJ | -2.13 | 0.55 | -3.39 | -1.62 | 4 |
湄潭 MT | -3.83 | 1.35 | 2.49 | -1.02 | 3 |
大方 DF | 1.13 | -4.21 | 0.55 | -0.53 | 2 |
丹寨 DZ | 4.83 | 2.30 | 0.36 | 3.17 | 1 |
1 | 朱国胜,桂阳,刘鹏,等.白鬼笔仿野生栽培技术[J].农技服务,2018,35(3):36-40. |
ZHU G S, GUI Y, LIU P,et al.. Imitation wild cultivation techniques of Phallus impudicus L. [J]. Agric. Technol. Service,2018,35(3):36-40. | |
2 | 黄年来.中国食用菌百科[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1993:3-172. |
3 | 郑秀艳,孟繁博,邬彩灵,等.黔产白鬼笔不同部位品质分析与评价[J].现代食品科技,2021,37(12):23-32. |
ZHENG X Y, MENG F B, WU C L,et al.. Quality analysis and evaluation of different parts of Phallus impudicus L.of Guizhou [J].Mod. Food Sci. Technol., 2021,37(12):23-32. | |
4 | 首坤秀,王山立,林灵,等.冬荪及其蛋托的成分分析和抗氧化活性研究[J].食品科技,2020,45(2):264-271. |
SHOU K X, WANG S L, LIN L,et al.. Study on the component analysis and antioxidant activity of Phallus inpudicu and egg tray [J]. Food Sci. Technol., 2020,45(2):264-271. | |
5 | 李文力,黎璐,汤洪敏.黔产白鬼笔不同部位提取物的成分分析[J].食品科学,2016,37(2):72-76. |
LI W L, LI L, TANG H M. Chemical composition analysis of extracts from different parts of Phallus impudicus L. growing in Guizhou province [J]. Food Sci., 2016,37(2):72-76. | |
6 | 何忠国,侯俊,王彩云,等.栽培料用量、主材种类组合、栽培时间对冬荪产量的影响[J].农业工程技术,2021,41(17):14-17. |
HE Z G, HOU J, WANG C Y, et al.. Effects of cultivation material dosage,main material type combination and cultivation time on Phallus impudicus L. yield [J]. Agric. Eng. Technol., 2021,41(17):14-17. | |
7 | 张进强,周涛,郭兰萍,等.天麻-冬荪轮种模式的生态效益研究[J].中国中药杂志,2020,45(3):457-462. |
ZHANG J Q, ZHOU T, GUO L P, et al.. Ecological benefits of Gastrodia elata-Phallus impudicus sequential planting pattern [J]. China J. Chin. Mater. Med., 2020,45(3):457-462. | |
8 | 徐彦军,杨念龙,袁涛,等.添加茶枝屑熟料栽培对白鬼笔生长及产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(21):152-154. |
XU Y J, YANG N L, YUAN T, et al.. Effects of adding tea branch clinker on growth and yield of Phallus impudicus L. [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2017,45(21):152-154. | |
9 | 何忠国,侯俊,王彩云,等.冬荪优良菌种筛选研究[J].耕作与栽培,2021,41(4):33-37. |
HE Z G, HOU J, WANG C Y, et al.. Study on screening of excellent strains of Phallus impudicus L. [J]. Farming Cult., 2021,41(4):33-37. | |
10 | 桂阳,龚光禄,卢颖颖,等.白鬼笔出菇特性研究[J].食用菌,2013(3):12-14. |
GUI Y, GONG G L, LU Y Y, et al.. Study on fruiting characteristics of Phallus impudicus L. [J]. Edible Fungi, 2013(3):12-14. | |
11 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食用菌安全国家标准 食用菌及其制品: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014. |
12 | 熊丙全,兰秀华,彭卫红,等.不同羊肚菌氨基酸比较分析及营养评价[J].食品发酵与工业,2020, 46(2):114-119. |
XIONG B Q, LAN X H, PENG W H, et al.. Comparative analysis and nutritional evaluation of different amino acids in Morchlla.spp [J]. Food Ferment. Ind., 2020,46(2):114-119. | |
13 | 蒲玲玲,段洁,张莎莎,等.野生菊花不同部位氨基酸的分析[J].营养学报,2018,40(4):415-416. |
PU L L, DUAN J, ZHANG S S, et al.. Analysis of amino acids in different parts of dendranthema indicum [J]. Acta Nutr. Sin., 2018,40(4):415-416. | |
14 | 温立香,袁冬寅,欧淑琼,等.广西三个产区虫茶主要茶特征成分、挥发性成分分析及氨基酸营养评价[J].食品工业科技,2022,43(20):1-12. |
WEN L X, YUAN D Y, OU S Q, et al.. Analysis of main tea characteristic components and volatile components and amino acid nutrition evaluation of insect tea from three producing areas in Guangxi [J]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2022,43(20):1-12. | |
15 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中氨基酸的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016. |
16 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中多元素的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016. |
17 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准 食品中灰分的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016. |
18 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中脂肪的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016. |
19 | 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 植物类食品中粗纤维的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003. |
20 | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 食用菌中总糖含量的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009. |
21 | 王艳,王燕萍,崔方,等.3种党参药材氨基酸组成与营养评价分析及品种分类研究[J].时珍国医国药,2021,32(10):2421-2425. |
WANG Y, WANG Y P, CUI F, et al.. Amino acid composition, nutritional evaluation and variety classification of three kinds of Codonopsis pilosula [J]. Lishizhen Med. Mater. Med. Res., 2021,32(10):2421-2425. | |
22 | 王永辉,吴瑾,白家磊,等.不同产地松茸中氨基酸含量测定及比较[J].营养学报,2019,41(5): 519-520. |
WANG Y H, WU J, BAI J L,et al.. Determination and comparison of amino acids in Tricholoma matsutake from different habitats [J]. Acta Nutr. Sin., 2019,41(5):519-520. | |
23 | 郭如鑫,王有琼,张重权,等.辣木蛋白质与氨基酸组成分析及营养评价[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2020,35(2):324-331. |
GUO R X, WANG Y Q, ZHANG Z Q, et al.. Protein and amino acid composition analysis and nutritional evaluation of Moringa oleifera lam [J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2020,35(2):324-331. | |
24 | 彭超,蔡春菊,涂佳,等.以竹屑为主要培养基质的食用菌营养成分差异及评价[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(7):2052-2058. |
PENG C, CAI C J, TU J, et al.. Difference and evaluation of nutritional contents in edible mushrooms cultured with main medium of bamboo sawdust [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2021,42(7):2052-2058. | |
25 | 侯娜, 赵莉莉, 魏安智,等.不同种质花椒氨基酸组成及营养价值评价[J].食品科学,2017,38(18): 113-118. |
HOU N, ZHAO L L, WEI A Z, et al.. Amino acid composition and nutritional quality evaluation of different germplasms of chinese prickly ash [J]. Food Sci., 2017,38(18):113-118. | |
26 | 王小生.必需氨基酸对人体健康的影响[J].中国食物与营养,2005(7):48-49. |
WANG X S. Food and nutrition in China [J]. Chin. Food Nutr., 2005(7):48-49. | |
27 | 侯娣,黄卫华,陈洪雨,等.球状香菇菌株的氨基酸特征分析及蛋白质品质评价[J].菌物学报,2021, 40(9):2412-2422. |
HOU D, HUANG W H, CHEN H Y, et al.. Amino acid profile and protein quality of Lentinula edodes with ball-shaped fruiting bodies [J]. Mycosystema, 2021,40(9):2412-2422. | |
28 | 颜孙安,林香信,李巍,等.闽产食用菌的氨基酸组成特征及其营养评价[J].食品安全质量检测学报, 2021,12(19):7723-7731. |
YAN S A, LIN X X, LI W, et al.. Amino acid composition characteristics and nutritional evaluation of edible fungi produced in Fujian [J]. J. Food Saf. Qual., 2021,12(19):7723-7731. | |
29 | 王允茹,蔡秋杏,张晨晓,等.北部湾海区三种常见牡蛎的蛋白质及氨基酸营养分析与评价[J].食品工业科技,2022,43(7):310-316. |
WANG Y R, CAI Q X, ZHANG C X,et al.. Analysis and evaluation of protein and amino acid nutrition of three common oysters in Beibu Gulf [J]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2022, 43(7):310-316. | |
30 | 徐杰,廖津,林泽安,等.石斑鱼肉肽粉的氨基酸组成分析与营养价值评价[J].食品与发酵工业,2021, 47(23):221-226. |
XU J, LIAO J, LIN Z A, et al.. Amino acid composition analysis and nutrition value evaluation of peptide powder from grouper muscle [J]. Food Ferment. Ind., 2021,47(23):221-226. | |
31 | 张涛,宋海云,贺鹏,等.不同澳洲坚果种质果仁氨基酸组成分析与评价[J].中国农业科技导报,2022,24(1):119-127. |
ZHANG T, SONG H Y, HE P, et al.. Analysis and evaluation of amino acid composition in different Macadamia ternifolia germplasm [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2022,24(1):119-127. | |
32 | 李祥栋,章洁琼,潘虹,等.18份薏苡自交系的主要氨基酸及脂肪酸组分评价[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(21):159-164. |
LI X D, ZHANG J Q, PAN H, et al.. Evaluation of main amino acids and fatty acid components in 18 inbred lines of Coix lachryma-jobi [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2021,49(21):159-164. | |
33 | 卢士军,李泰,孙君茂,等.香菇、杏鲍菇和金针菇的氨基酸组成与蛋白质含量评价[J].中国食用菌,2022,41(1):45-51. |
LU S J, LI T, SUN J M, et al.. Amino acid composition and protein evaluation of Lentinula edodes,Pleurotus eryngii and Flammulina velutipes [J]. Chin. Edible Fungi, 2022,41(1):45-51. | |
34 | 黄清铧,王庆福,张柳莲,等.甘蔗渣栽培的不同颜色侧耳中的氨基酸组成与蛋白质营养评价[J].北方园艺,2019(10):127-133. |
HUANG Q H, WANG Q F, ZHANG L L, et al.. Evaluation of amino acid composition and protein nutrition in Pleurotus pulmonarius of different colors cultivated with bagasse [J]. Northern Hortic., 2019(10):127-133. | |
35 | 曾心美,王希,石小庆,等.17个品种木芙蓉花的矿质元素分析评价及健康风险评估[J/OL].食品工业科技,2022[2022-04-30].. |
ZENG X M, WANG X, SHI X Q, et al.. The evaluation of mineral nutrient and health risk in flower of 17 cultivars of Hibiscus mutabilis L. [J/OL]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2022 [2022-04-30]. . | |
36 | FRAGA C G. Relevance,essentiality and toxicity of trace elements in human health [J]. Mol. Aspects Med., 2005,26(4-5):235-244. |
37 | World Health Organization. Trace Elements in Human Nutrition and Health [M]. Geneva: WHO, 1996. |
38 | 王丽涛.微量元素锌铜与人体健康[J].微量元素与健康研究,2007,24(4):66. |
WANG L T. Trace element zinc and copper on human health [J]. Stud. Trace Elem. Health, 2007,24 (4):66. | |
39 | 于冬梅,何宇纳,郭齐雅,等.2002—2012 年中国居民能量营养素摄入状况及变化趋势[J].卫生研究,2016,45(4):527-533. |
YU D M, HE Y N, GUO Q Y, et al.. Trends of energy and nutrients intake among Chinese population in 2002—2012 [J]. J. Hygi. Res., 2016,45(4):527-533. | |
40 | 王德美,刘桂华,范成五,等.黔产红托竹荪基地土壤-红托竹荪体系矿质元素含量及相关性分析[J].中国农学通报,2022,38(14):72-76. |
WANG D M, LIU G H, FAN C W, et al.. Content and correlation analysis of mineral elements in soil-dictyophora rubra system in Guizhou [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2022,38(14):72-76. | |
41 | 李浪,孙燕,刘妮.红托竹荪与覆土土壤矿质元素相关性分析[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(5): 99-102. |
LI L, SUN Y, LIU N. Correlation analysis between dictyophora rubra and mineral elements of soil [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2019,47(5):99-102. | |
42 | 李曦,邓兰,周娅,等.金耳、银耳与木耳的营养成分比较[J].食品研究与开发,2021,42(16): 77-82. |
LI X, DENG L, ZHOU Y, et al.. Nutritional components comparison between Tremella aurantialba,Tremella fucitormis and Auricularia aurricula [J]. Food Res. Dev., 2021,42(16):77-82. | |
43 | 张兆英,宋立立.12种野生食用菌中总糖含量分析[J].中国食用菌,2019,38(4):33-35. |
ZHAO Z Y, SONG L L. Analysis on total sugar content in 12 kinds of wild edible fungi [J]. Chin. Edible Fungi, 2019,38(4):33-35. | |
44 | 靳荣线,李峰,邹明,等.基于主成分分析法的不同等级香菇品质评价[J].中国瓜菜,2022,35(8): 50-56. |
JIN R X, LI F, ZOU M, et al.. Evaluation of lentinula edodes quality based on principal component analysis [J]. China Cucurbits Veg., 2022,35(8):50-56. | |
45 | 邓雅元,游金坤,华蓉,等.3种常见野生牛肝菌和3种大宗人工食用菌营养成分分析[J].中国食用菌,2022,41(3):45-48. |
DENG Y Y, YOU J K, HUA R, et al.. Nutritional analysis of three common wild boltus spp.and three staple artificial edible fungi [J]. Chin. Edible Fungi, 2022,41(3):45-48. | |
46 | 李泰,卢士军,孙君茂,等.26种常见市售食用菌营养成分分析及评价[J].中国食用菌,2021,40(12):66-72. |
LI T, LU S J, SUN J M, et al.. Analysis and evaluation on nutritional components of 26 common edible fungi in market [J]. Chin. Edible Fungi, 2021,40(12):66-72. |
[1] | Qianqian LU, Abuduwaili Abulimiti, Yixing HOU, Zhihui LI, Shuang WANG, Long ZHOU. Research of the Photosynthetic Characteristics of 7 Table Grape Varieties Under Compound Salt-alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 63-76. |
[2] | Shuang WANG, Yixing HOU, Linjiao FENG, Qianqian LU, Long ZHOU. Effect of Drought Stress on Anatomical Structure of Leaves in Table Grape Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 40-49. |
[3] | Shulin ZHENG, Yutao SHI, Feiquan WANG, Bangqiang WU, Yuanhua LI, Bo ZHANG, Naixing YE. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Content of Mineral Elements in Flowers of Different Tea Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 178-188. |
[4] | Shengwei GUO, Siwen BIAN, Jianwen DING, Xiaochen ZHANG, Xing YANG, Jin DU, Chunyang XIANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Temperature Tolerance of Waxy Maize Varieties at Germination Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 38-47. |
[5] | Ding DING, Lingjie ZHENG, Hongbao WANG, Lijin ZHENG, Yanchao GUO. Agronomic Traits and Effective Components of Different Tea Chrysanthemum Varieties in Coastal Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 45-53. |
[6] | Guanqun CHAI, Guihua LIU, Wei ZHOU, Xiujin ZHANG, Longpin LI, Chengwu FAN. Evaluation of Pollution Risk and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Greenhouse Soils in Wumeng Mountain Area, Guizhou Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 144-153. |
[7] | Xiaxia LI, Siyu ZHANG, Zhihui CHENG. Regional Trial Evaluation of High Quality Garlic Cultivars of China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 58-68. |
[8] | LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia. LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia* [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 21-32. |
[9] | WANG Ying1, YU Yanghua2*. Evolution in the Spatio-temporal Pattern of Agricultural Sustainable Development Level in China Based on Multi-scales [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 8-17. |
[10] | LUO Lina1, HAN Shuquan1*, WANG Daigu1, LI Maofu2, MA Weihong3, ZHANG Zhengxue1, LIU Xiaocui1. Analysis and Evaluation of the Differences in Fruit Quality of Avocado [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 105-113. |
[11] | CHEN Xiaojie, LYU Desheng, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, ZONG Rui, WEN Yue, ZOU Jie. Effects of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on the Yield and Quality of Processing Tomato Under Aerated Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 191-200. |
[12] | ZHANG Yongfang, GAO Zhihui, SHI Pengqing, HAN Zhiping*. Adaptability Analysis of Different Soybean Varieties Based on Agronomic and Quality Traits [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 25-32. |
[13] |
WANG Hui, YANG Yuan, SHI Jinbo.
Adaptability Evaluation of Different Common Buckwheat Varieties (Lines) in Northern Shanxi
[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 33-40.
|
[14] | SHI Yutao1, ZHENG Shulin1, WANG Feiquan1, CHEN Rongbing1, LI Yuanhua1, ZHANG Bo1, WANG Han2, LIN Li2. Characteristics Analysis of Mineral Element Contents in Wuyi Mingcong Tea Plant Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(7): 37-50. |
[15] | WANG Ruixia, LI Xiaoyu, TIAN Hongxian*. Drought Resistance Identification and Comprehensive Drought Resistance Index Screening of Rapeseed(Brassica juncea L.)in North Shanxi#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 42-51. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||