Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 45-53.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0536
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Ding DING1(), Lingjie ZHENG1, Hongbao WANG2, Lijin ZHENG3, Yanchao GUO1(
)
Received:
2022-06-28
Accepted:
2022-09-24
Online:
2023-10-15
Published:
2023-10-27
Contact:
Yanchao GUO
丁丁1(), 郑伶杰1, 王红宝2, 郑丽锦3, 郭艳超1(
)
通讯作者:
郭艳超
作者简介:
丁丁 E-mail:dddyiman@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Ding DING, Lingjie ZHENG, Hongbao WANG, Lijin ZHENG, Yanchao GUO. Agronomic Traits and Effective Components of Different Tea Chrysanthemum Varieties in Coastal Area[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 45-53.
丁丁, 郑伶杰, 王红宝, 郑丽锦, 郭艳超. 滨海地区不同茶菊品种农艺性状及有效成分综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(10): 45-53.
品种 Variety | 花色 Color | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | 白色 White | 河南 Henan |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 粉色 Pink | 河南 Henan |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | 白色 White | 北京 Beijing |
乳荷 Ruhe | 白色 White | 北京 Beijing |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | 白色 White | 北京 Beijing |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
Table 1 Tea Chrysanthemum resource information
品种 Variety | 花色 Color | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | 白色 White | 河南 Henan |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 粉色 Pink | 河南 Henan |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | 白色 White | 北京 Beijing |
乳荷 Ruhe | 白色 White | 北京 Beijing |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | 白色 White | 北京 Beijing |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 黄色 Yellow | 河南 Henan |
品种 Variety | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎粗 Stem diameter/mm | 冠幅 Crown width/cm | 叶长 Leaf length/cm | 叶宽 Leaf width/cm | 叶重 Leaf weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | 55.90±2.95 b | 6.29±0.67 bc | 44.43±4.08 cd | 6.20±0.66 bc | 3.70±0.40 b | 0.30±0.08 ef |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 56.07±2.87 b | 5.95±1.31 bcd | 40.83±6.19 de | 7.47±1.66 ab | 4.23±1.09 b | 0.58±0.12 bc |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 46.93±3.11 c | 6.49±1.08 bc | 47.20±1.82 c | 7.43±1.48 ab | 4.67±1.65 ab | 0.69±0.03 b |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | 31.67±3.33 d | 4.32±0.96 d | 35.20±3.27 e | 3.83±1.33 c | 2.43±0.67 b | 0.20±0.03 f |
乳荷 Ruhe | 41.93±3.38 c | 6.00±1.02 bcd | 39.23±3.24 de | 6.26±0.84 bc | 3.43±0.91 b | 0.32±0.05 ef |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | 45.33±1.76 c | 7.77±0.62 ab | 44.50±3.28 cd | 6.44±1.87 bc | 3.50±1.59 b | 0.44±0.13 de |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | 33.13±3.07 d | 5.54±0.63 cd | 64.90±1.38 a | 4.80±1.69 bc | 2.64±1.00 b | 0.19±0.04 f |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 53.60±4.28 b | 8.98±1.50 a | 39.40±2.53 de | 10.80±3.04 a | 6.57±2.08 a | 1.01±0.14 a |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 65.50±1.32 a | 7.67±0.70 ab | 54.45±3.16 b | 8.25±2.51 ab | 4.20±1.89 b | 0.50±0.08 cd |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 66.67±2.66 a | 6.33±0.77 bc | 56.60±5.09 b | 7.78±1.97 ab | 4.28±1.23 b | 0.41±0.24 de |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 25.54 | 20.02 | 20.12 | 27.78 | 29.34 | 53.49 |
Table 2 Traits related to plant and leaf of different tea Chrysanthemum varieties
品种 Variety | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎粗 Stem diameter/mm | 冠幅 Crown width/cm | 叶长 Leaf length/cm | 叶宽 Leaf width/cm | 叶重 Leaf weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | 55.90±2.95 b | 6.29±0.67 bc | 44.43±4.08 cd | 6.20±0.66 bc | 3.70±0.40 b | 0.30±0.08 ef |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 56.07±2.87 b | 5.95±1.31 bcd | 40.83±6.19 de | 7.47±1.66 ab | 4.23±1.09 b | 0.58±0.12 bc |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 46.93±3.11 c | 6.49±1.08 bc | 47.20±1.82 c | 7.43±1.48 ab | 4.67±1.65 ab | 0.69±0.03 b |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | 31.67±3.33 d | 4.32±0.96 d | 35.20±3.27 e | 3.83±1.33 c | 2.43±0.67 b | 0.20±0.03 f |
乳荷 Ruhe | 41.93±3.38 c | 6.00±1.02 bcd | 39.23±3.24 de | 6.26±0.84 bc | 3.43±0.91 b | 0.32±0.05 ef |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | 45.33±1.76 c | 7.77±0.62 ab | 44.50±3.28 cd | 6.44±1.87 bc | 3.50±1.59 b | 0.44±0.13 de |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | 33.13±3.07 d | 5.54±0.63 cd | 64.90±1.38 a | 4.80±1.69 bc | 2.64±1.00 b | 0.19±0.04 f |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 53.60±4.28 b | 8.98±1.50 a | 39.40±2.53 de | 10.80±3.04 a | 6.57±2.08 a | 1.01±0.14 a |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 65.50±1.32 a | 7.67±0.70 ab | 54.45±3.16 b | 8.25±2.51 ab | 4.20±1.89 b | 0.50±0.08 cd |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 66.67±2.66 a | 6.33±0.77 bc | 56.60±5.09 b | 7.78±1.97 ab | 4.28±1.23 b | 0.41±0.24 de |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 25.54 | 20.02 | 20.12 | 27.78 | 29.34 | 53.49 |
品种 Variety | 单花鲜重 Flower fresh weight/g | 单花干重 Flower dry weight/g | 花径 Flower diameter/cm | 花瓣层数 Flower layers | 花瓣数 Petals number | 外轮瓣长 Petal length/cm | 外轮瓣宽 Petal width/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | 1.75±0.22 e | 0.24±0.03 b | 4.02±0.08 d | 9.33±0.58 c | 210.33±39.76 ab | 1.93±0.15 ef | 0.77±0.06 a |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 3.05±0.15 cd | 0.27±0.01 b | 5.28±0.30 b | 7.00±1.00 d | 101.83±9.85 d | 3.75±0.12 b | 0.33±0.05 e |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 0.69±0.05 f | 0.07±0.01 d | 4.47±0.25 cd | 1.33±0.58 e | 34.67±4.58 e | 2.75±0.06 c | 0.35±0.05 e |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | 1.84±0.09 bc | 0.23±0.03 b | 4.53±0.09 c | 8.67±0.58 c | 194.67±23.06 b | 2.43±0.15 d | 0.68±0.08 b |
乳荷 Ruhe | 1.13±0.10 e | 0.16±0.03 c | 4.48±0.17 cd | 7.00±1.00 d | 138.67±16.71 cd | 2.23±0.15 de | 0.67±0.05 b |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | 1.40±0.20 de | 0.19±0.02 c | 4.47±0.28 cd | 8.67±0.58 c | 158.33±9.07 c | 2.03±0.06 ef | 0.68±0.08 b |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | 0.34±0.04 f | 0.04±0.01 d | 2.15±0.23 e | 11.00±0.00 b | 196.67±12.22 b | 1.77±0.25 f | 0.17±0.05 f |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 4.33±0.27 a | 0.39±0.02 a | 5.77±0.61 a | 10.67±0.58 b | 130.33±10.69 cd | 4.05±0.32 a | 0.42±0.04 d |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 2.15±0.16 b | 0.25±0.03 b | 4.48±0.17 cd | 14.67±0.58 a | 245.33±27.59 a | 2.17±0.12 de | 0.62±0.04 bc |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 2.01±0.17 bc | 0.20±0.02 c | 4.40±0.24 cd | 14.33±0.58 a | 237.00±10.54 a | 1.93±0.06 ef | 0.57±0.05 c |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 65.87 | 49.84 | 21.27 | 41.62 | 39.50 | 31.55 | 37.05 |
Table 3 Traits related to flower morphology of different tea Chrysanthemum varieties
品种 Variety | 单花鲜重 Flower fresh weight/g | 单花干重 Flower dry weight/g | 花径 Flower diameter/cm | 花瓣层数 Flower layers | 花瓣数 Petals number | 外轮瓣长 Petal length/cm | 外轮瓣宽 Petal width/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | 1.75±0.22 e | 0.24±0.03 b | 4.02±0.08 d | 9.33±0.58 c | 210.33±39.76 ab | 1.93±0.15 ef | 0.77±0.06 a |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 3.05±0.15 cd | 0.27±0.01 b | 5.28±0.30 b | 7.00±1.00 d | 101.83±9.85 d | 3.75±0.12 b | 0.33±0.05 e |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 0.69±0.05 f | 0.07±0.01 d | 4.47±0.25 cd | 1.33±0.58 e | 34.67±4.58 e | 2.75±0.06 c | 0.35±0.05 e |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | 1.84±0.09 bc | 0.23±0.03 b | 4.53±0.09 c | 8.67±0.58 c | 194.67±23.06 b | 2.43±0.15 d | 0.68±0.08 b |
乳荷 Ruhe | 1.13±0.10 e | 0.16±0.03 c | 4.48±0.17 cd | 7.00±1.00 d | 138.67±16.71 cd | 2.23±0.15 de | 0.67±0.05 b |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | 1.40±0.20 de | 0.19±0.02 c | 4.47±0.28 cd | 8.67±0.58 c | 158.33±9.07 c | 2.03±0.06 ef | 0.68±0.08 b |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | 0.34±0.04 f | 0.04±0.01 d | 2.15±0.23 e | 11.00±0.00 b | 196.67±12.22 b | 1.77±0.25 f | 0.17±0.05 f |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 4.33±0.27 a | 0.39±0.02 a | 5.77±0.61 a | 10.67±0.58 b | 130.33±10.69 cd | 4.05±0.32 a | 0.42±0.04 d |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 2.15±0.16 b | 0.25±0.03 b | 4.48±0.17 cd | 14.67±0.58 a | 245.33±27.59 a | 2.17±0.12 de | 0.62±0.04 bc |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 2.01±0.17 bc | 0.20±0.02 c | 4.40±0.24 cd | 14.33±0.58 a | 237.00±10.54 a | 1.93±0.06 ef | 0.57±0.05 c |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 65.87 | 49.84 | 21.27 | 41.62 | 39.50 | 31.55 | 37.05 |
品种 Variety | 绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid | 3,5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸 3, 5-O dicoffeoacy lquinic acid | 木犀草苷 Luteolin |
---|---|---|---|
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | 0.57 | 0.96 | 0.13 |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 1.16 | 0.79 | 0.25 |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 1.19 | 1.26 | 0.53 |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | 0.82 | 1.23 | 0.22 |
乳荷 Ruhe | 1.15 | 1.82 | 0.37 |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | 1.20 | 1.94 | 0.40 |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.35 |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 0.55 | 0.77 | 0.64 |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 1.32 | 2.24 | 1.38 |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.67 |
Table 4 Contents of 3 effective components of different tea Chrysanthemum varieties
品种 Variety | 绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid | 3,5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸 3, 5-O dicoffeoacy lquinic acid | 木犀草苷 Luteolin |
---|---|---|---|
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | 0.57 | 0.96 | 0.13 |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 1.16 | 0.79 | 0.25 |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 1.19 | 1.26 | 0.53 |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | 0.82 | 1.23 | 0.22 |
乳荷 Ruhe | 1.15 | 1.82 | 0.37 |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | 1.20 | 1.94 | 0.40 |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.35 |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 0.55 | 0.77 | 0.64 |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 1.32 | 2.24 | 1.38 |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.67 |
指标 Index | 株高Plant height | 茎粗 Stem diameter | 冠幅 Crown width | 叶长 Leaf length | 叶宽 Leaf width | 叶重 Leaf weight | 单花鲜重 Flower fresh weight | 单花干重 Flower dry weight | 花径 Flower diameter | 花瓣层数 Flower layers | 花瓣数 Petals number | 外轮瓣长 Petal length | 外轮 瓣宽 Petal width | 绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid | 3,5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸 3, 5-O dicoffeoacy lquinic acid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎粗Stem diameter | 0.520 | ||||||||||||||
冠幅Crown width | 0.183 | 0.014 | |||||||||||||
叶长Leaf length | 0.707* | 0.854** | -0.049 | ||||||||||||
叶宽Leaf width | 0.594 | 0.794** | -0.166 | 0.968** | |||||||||||
叶重Leaf weight | 0.443 | 0.768** | -0.252 | 0.907** | 0.958** | ||||||||||
单花鲜重Flower fresh weight | 0.453 | 0.520 | -0.440 | 0.709* | 0.719* | 0.685* | |||||||||
单花干重Flower dry weight | 0.432 | 0.490 | -0.539 | 0.591 | 0.587 | 0.533 | 0.951** | ||||||||
花径Flower diameter | 0.431 | 0.454 | -0.726* | 0.647* | 0.680* | 0.713* | 0.793* | 0.784** | |||||||
花瓣层数Flower layers | 0.395 | 0.224 | 0.458 | 0.174 | 0.010 | -0.157 | 0.291 | 0.350 | -0.136 | ||||||
花瓣数Petals number | 0.200 | -0.090 | 0.410 | -0.210 | -0.350 | -0.523 | -0.008 | 0.148 | -0.350 | 0.895** | |||||
外轮瓣长Petal length | 0.152 | 0.363 | -0.528 | 0.619 | 0.710* | 0.806** | 0.781* | 0.619 | 0.752* | -0.280 | -0.588 | ||||
外轮瓣宽Petal width | 0.161 | 0.011 | -0.441 | -0.151 | -0.192 | -0.288 | 0.039 | 0.327 | 0.259 | 0.193 | 0.427 | -0.366 | |||
绿原酸Chlorogenic acid | 0.126 | -0.036 | -0.002 | -0.019 | -0.146 | -0.004 | -0.287 | -0.281 | 0.123 | -0.259 | -0.272 | -0.069 | 0.027 | ||
3,5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸 3, 5-O dicoffeoacy lquinic acid | 0.096 | 0.234 | -0.106 | -0.031 | -0.171 | -0.118 | -0.230 | -0.049 | 0.112 | 0.063 | 0.147 | -0.340 | 0.551 | 0.728* | |
木犀草苷Luteolin | 0.578 | 0.536 | 0.384 | 0.536 | 0.380 | 0.341 | 0.191 | 0.175 | 0.156 | 0.514 | 0.305 | -0.021 | 0.008 | 0.391 | 0.516 |
Table 5 Correlation among traits of different tea Chrysanthemum varieties
指标 Index | 株高Plant height | 茎粗 Stem diameter | 冠幅 Crown width | 叶长 Leaf length | 叶宽 Leaf width | 叶重 Leaf weight | 单花鲜重 Flower fresh weight | 单花干重 Flower dry weight | 花径 Flower diameter | 花瓣层数 Flower layers | 花瓣数 Petals number | 外轮瓣长 Petal length | 外轮 瓣宽 Petal width | 绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid | 3,5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸 3, 5-O dicoffeoacy lquinic acid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎粗Stem diameter | 0.520 | ||||||||||||||
冠幅Crown width | 0.183 | 0.014 | |||||||||||||
叶长Leaf length | 0.707* | 0.854** | -0.049 | ||||||||||||
叶宽Leaf width | 0.594 | 0.794** | -0.166 | 0.968** | |||||||||||
叶重Leaf weight | 0.443 | 0.768** | -0.252 | 0.907** | 0.958** | ||||||||||
单花鲜重Flower fresh weight | 0.453 | 0.520 | -0.440 | 0.709* | 0.719* | 0.685* | |||||||||
单花干重Flower dry weight | 0.432 | 0.490 | -0.539 | 0.591 | 0.587 | 0.533 | 0.951** | ||||||||
花径Flower diameter | 0.431 | 0.454 | -0.726* | 0.647* | 0.680* | 0.713* | 0.793* | 0.784** | |||||||
花瓣层数Flower layers | 0.395 | 0.224 | 0.458 | 0.174 | 0.010 | -0.157 | 0.291 | 0.350 | -0.136 | ||||||
花瓣数Petals number | 0.200 | -0.090 | 0.410 | -0.210 | -0.350 | -0.523 | -0.008 | 0.148 | -0.350 | 0.895** | |||||
外轮瓣长Petal length | 0.152 | 0.363 | -0.528 | 0.619 | 0.710* | 0.806** | 0.781* | 0.619 | 0.752* | -0.280 | -0.588 | ||||
外轮瓣宽Petal width | 0.161 | 0.011 | -0.441 | -0.151 | -0.192 | -0.288 | 0.039 | 0.327 | 0.259 | 0.193 | 0.427 | -0.366 | |||
绿原酸Chlorogenic acid | 0.126 | -0.036 | -0.002 | -0.019 | -0.146 | -0.004 | -0.287 | -0.281 | 0.123 | -0.259 | -0.272 | -0.069 | 0.027 | ||
3,5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸 3, 5-O dicoffeoacy lquinic acid | 0.096 | 0.234 | -0.106 | -0.031 | -0.171 | -0.118 | -0.230 | -0.049 | 0.112 | 0.063 | 0.147 | -0.340 | 0.551 | 0.728* | |
木犀草苷Luteolin | 0.578 | 0.536 | 0.384 | 0.536 | 0.380 | 0.341 | 0.191 | 0.175 | 0.156 | 0.514 | 0.305 | -0.021 | 0.008 | 0.391 | 0.516 |
指标 Index | 主成分Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
株高Plant height | 0.229 | 0.299 | 0.020 | -0.079 |
茎粗Stem diameter | 0.294 | 0.177 | 0.075 | -0.155 |
冠幅Crown width | -0.143 | 0.295 | -0.205 | -0.457 |
叶长Leaf length | 0.360 | 0.104 | -0.014 | -0.181 |
叶宽Leaf width | 0.364 | -0.006 | -0.056 | -0.162 |
叶重Leaf weight | 0.359 | -0.093 | 0.030 | -0.195 |
单花鲜重Flower fresh weight | 0.340 | 0.012 | -0.180 | 0.209 |
单花干重Flower dry weight | 0.306 | 0.073 | -0.114 | 0.362 |
花径Flower diameter | 0.330 | -0.095 | 0.179 | 0.236 |
花瓣层数Flower layers | 0.027 | 0.468 | -0.276 | 0.100 |
花瓣数Petals number | -0.110 | 0.449 | -0.226 | 0.233 |
外轮瓣长Petal length | 0.311 | -0.275 | -0.056 | -0.015 |
外轮瓣宽Petal width | -0.017 | 0.195 | 0.232 | 0.527 |
绿原酸Chlorogenic acid | -0.022 | 0.053 | 0.578 | -0.175 |
3,5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸 3, 5-O dicoffeoacy lquinic acid | -0.024 | 0.246 | 0.564 | 0.090 |
木犀草苷Luteolin | 0.143 | 0.401 | 0.183 | -0.228 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 6.657 | 3.330 | 2.289 | 2.247 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 41.609 | 20.814 | 14.307 | 14.043 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 41.609 | 62.422 | 76.729 | 90.772 |
Table 6 Coefficient and contribution rate of various characters of tea chrysanthemum varieties
指标 Index | 主成分Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
株高Plant height | 0.229 | 0.299 | 0.020 | -0.079 |
茎粗Stem diameter | 0.294 | 0.177 | 0.075 | -0.155 |
冠幅Crown width | -0.143 | 0.295 | -0.205 | -0.457 |
叶长Leaf length | 0.360 | 0.104 | -0.014 | -0.181 |
叶宽Leaf width | 0.364 | -0.006 | -0.056 | -0.162 |
叶重Leaf weight | 0.359 | -0.093 | 0.030 | -0.195 |
单花鲜重Flower fresh weight | 0.340 | 0.012 | -0.180 | 0.209 |
单花干重Flower dry weight | 0.306 | 0.073 | -0.114 | 0.362 |
花径Flower diameter | 0.330 | -0.095 | 0.179 | 0.236 |
花瓣层数Flower layers | 0.027 | 0.468 | -0.276 | 0.100 |
花瓣数Petals number | -0.110 | 0.449 | -0.226 | 0.233 |
外轮瓣长Petal length | 0.311 | -0.275 | -0.056 | -0.015 |
外轮瓣宽Petal width | -0.017 | 0.195 | 0.232 | 0.527 |
绿原酸Chlorogenic acid | -0.022 | 0.053 | 0.578 | -0.175 |
3,5-O-二咖啡酰基奎宁酸 3, 5-O dicoffeoacy lquinic acid | -0.024 | 0.246 | 0.564 | 0.090 |
木犀草苷Luteolin | 0.143 | 0.401 | 0.183 | -0.228 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 6.657 | 3.330 | 2.289 | 2.247 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 41.609 | 20.814 | 14.307 | 14.043 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 41.609 | 62.422 | 76.729 | 90.772 |
品种 Variety | 综合指标值Comprehensive index value | 隶属函数Membership function | D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | |||
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | -1.515 | 1.334 | 1.013 | -1.082 | 0.250 | 0.803 | 0.810 | 0.185 | 0.455 | 6 |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 1.174 | -1.833 | 0.555 | -0.766 | 0.554 | 0.271 | 0.722 | 0.257 | 0.470 | 5 |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 0.722 | -3.448 | -1.463 | 1.026 | 0.503 | 0.000 | 0.336 | 0.663 | 0.386 | 8 |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | -3.721 | 0.021 | 2.010 | -0.647 | 0.000 | 0.582 | 1.000 | 0.284 | 0.335 | 9 |
乳荷 Ruhe | -1.729 | -0.877 | 0.857 | 1.320 | 0.225 | 0.431 | 0.780 | 0.730 | 0.438 | 7 |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | -0.640 | -0.158 | 0.539 | 1.624 | 0.349 | 0.552 | 0.719 | 0.799 | 0.523 | 4 |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | -2.536 | 0.399 | -3.221 | -1.546 | 0.134 | 0.646 | 0.000 | 0.080 | 0.222 | 10 |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 5.115 | -0.312 | 0.948 | -1.900 | 1.000 | 0.526 | 0.797 | 0.000 | 0.705 | 2 |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 2.268 | 2.511 | -0.501 | 2.513 | 0.678 | 1.000 | 0.520 | 1.000 | 0.777 | 1 |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 0.862 | 2.364 | -0.737 | -0.542 | 0.519 | 0.975 | 0.475 | 0.308 | 0.584 | 3 |
权重 Weight | — | — | — | — | 0.458 | 0.229 | 0.158 | 0.155 | — | — |
Table 7 Comprehensive score of different tea chrysanthemum varieties
品种 Variety | 综合指标值Comprehensive index value | 隶属函数Membership function | D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | |||
贡白菊 Gongbaiju | -1.515 | 1.334 | 1.013 | -1.082 | 0.250 | 0.803 | 0.810 | 0.185 | 0.455 | 6 |
藕粉托桂 Oufentuogui | 1.174 | -1.833 | 0.555 | -0.766 | 0.554 | 0.271 | 0.722 | 0.257 | 0.470 | 5 |
黄金托桂 Huangjintuogui | 0.722 | -3.448 | -1.463 | 1.026 | 0.503 | 0.000 | 0.336 | 0.663 | 0.386 | 8 |
黄滁龙 Huangchulong | -3.721 | 0.021 | 2.010 | -0.647 | 0.000 | 0.582 | 1.000 | 0.284 | 0.335 | 9 |
乳荷 Ruhe | -1.729 | -0.877 | 0.857 | 1.320 | 0.225 | 0.431 | 0.780 | 0.730 | 0.438 | 7 |
玉台1号 Yutai 1 | -0.640 | -0.158 | 0.539 | 1.624 | 0.349 | 0.552 | 0.719 | 0.799 | 0.523 | 4 |
黄金菊 Huangjinju | -2.536 | 0.399 | -3.221 | -1.546 | 0.134 | 0.646 | 0.000 | 0.080 | 0.222 | 10 |
金丝皇菊 Jinsihuangju | 5.115 | -0.312 | 0.948 | -1.900 | 1.000 | 0.526 | 0.797 | 0.000 | 0.705 | 2 |
贡黄菊 Gonghuangju | 2.268 | 2.511 | -0.501 | 2.513 | 0.678 | 1.000 | 0.520 | 1.000 | 0.777 | 1 |
晓起皇菊 Xiaoqihuangju | 0.862 | 2.364 | -0.737 | -0.542 | 0.519 | 0.975 | 0.475 | 0.308 | 0.584 | 3 |
权重 Weight | — | — | — | — | 0.458 | 0.229 | 0.158 | 0.155 | — | — |
1 | 陈俊愉.中国花卉品种分类学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社,2001: 218. |
2 | 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典[M].一部. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020: 323-324. |
3 | 任磊,赵夏陆,许靖,等. 4种茶菊对干旱胁迫的形态和生理响应[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(15): 5131-5139. |
REN L, ZHAO X L, XU J, et al.. Varied morphological and physiological responses to drought stress among four tea Chrysanthemum cultivars [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin.,2015, 35(15): 5131-5139. | |
4 | 夏伟,谭政委,余永亮,等. 药用菊花种质资源研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2018,46(21): 37-38, 49. |
XIA W, TAN Z W, YU Y L, et al.. Research progress of medicinal Chrysanthemum germplasm resources [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2018, 46(21): 37-38, 49. | |
5 | 孙叶硕,张国新,丁守鹏,等. 盐胁迫对樱桃番茄风味品质的影响[J]. 核农学报,2022,36(4): 838-844. |
SUN Y S, ZHANG G X, DING S P, et al.. Effects of salt stress on flavor compounds of cherry tomato fruits [J]. Acta Agric.Nucl. Sin., 2022, 36(4): 838-844. | |
6 | 汪涛,郭巧生,毛鹏飞,等. 不同产地杭菊植物学特征比较[J]. 中国中药杂志,2012,37(23): 3536-3539. |
WANG T, GUO Q S, MAO P F, et al.. Comparison of botanical characteristics of cultivated Chrysanthemum morifolium cv.‘Hangju’of different origins [J]. Chin. J. Chin. Mater Med., 2012, 37(23): 3536-3539. | |
7 | 朱德宁,韩宇,房伟民,等. 多花型园林小菊品质评价与品种筛选[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2018,41(2): 266-274. |
ZHU D N, HAN Y, FANG W M, et al.. Studies on the quality evaluation and variety selection of multi-flower garden Chrysanthemum [J]. Nanjing Agric.Univ., 2018, 41(2): 266-274. | |
8 | 张冬菊,张晓,吴鹏夫,等. 基于层次分析法的切花菊引种适应性评价[J]. 北方园艺,2013(22): 82-85. |
ZHANG D J, ZHANG X, WU P F, et al.. Introduction adaptability evaluation of cut Chrysanthemum based on analytic hierarchy process [J]. Northern Hortic., 2013(22): 82-85. | |
9 | 蒋琴杰,王艺光,房伟民,等. 叶用型食用菊品种筛选[J]. 核农学报,2020,34(1): 10-16. |
JIANG Q J, WAGN Y G, FANG W M, et al.. Selection of edible leaf-use Chrysanthemum [J]. Acta Agric.Nucl. Sin., 2020, 34(1): 10-16. | |
10 | 王江民,张建华,义鸣放,等. 植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性测试指南 菊花: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2018. |
WANG J M, ZHANG J H, YI M F, et al.. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stabilityChrysanthemum: [S]. Bejing: Standards Press of China, 2018. | |
11 | 马佳,刘雅辉,孙建平,等. Streptomyces TOR3209介导盐碱地金花葵根际的生态效应[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2020,43(2): 53-61. |
MA J, LIU Y H, SUN J P, et al.. Ecological effects of streptomyces TOR3209 on Hibiseu manihot L. rhizosphere soil of saline-alkali land [J]. J. Agric. Univ. Hebei, 2020, 43(2): 53-61. | |
12 | 郭方其,黑银秀,刘君,等. 利用层次分析法评价与筛选夏季切花多头菊品种[J]. 江西农业学报,2020,32(11): 25-31. |
GUO F Q, HEI Y X, LIU J, et al.. Evaluation and selection of summer spray cut Chrysanthemum varieties by analytic hierarchy process [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2020, 32(11): 25-31. | |
13 | 何晓群. 多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2015: 152-174. |
14 | 田小霞,毛培春,李杉杉,等. 紫花苜蓿苗期耐盐指标筛选及耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(3): 545-553. |
TIAN X X, MAO P C, LI S S, et al.. Dete rmination of salt tolerant indexes and vomprehensive eva luation of salt tolerance at the seedlings of alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2017, 25(3): 545-553. | |
15 | 耿雷跃,马小定,崔迪,等. 水稻全生育期耐盐性鉴定评价方法研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2019,20 (2): 267-275. |
GENG L Y, MA X D, CUI D, et al.. Identification and evaluation method for saline tolerance in rice during the whole growth stage [J]. J. Plant Genetic Resour., 2019, 20 (2): 267-275. | |
16 | 刘引. 不同菊花种质资源农艺性状、化学成分和药理作用比较研究[D]. 武汉:湖北中医药大学, 2020. |
LIU Y. Comparative study on agronomic characterization, chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of different Chrysanthemum germplasm resources [D]. Wuhan: Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, 2020. | |
17 | 吕晋慧,任磊,李艳锋,等. 不同基因型茶菊对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2013,37(7): 656-664. |
LYU J H, REN L, LI Y F, et al.. Responses to salt stress among different genotypes of tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Plant Ecol. J., 2013, 37(7): 656-664. | |
18 | 陈乐,刘引,陈昌婕,等. 药用及茶用菊花种质资源农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2022,20(15): 5172-5188. |
CHEN L, LIU Y, CHEN C J, et al.. Analysis on genetic diversity of agronomic traits in Chrysanthemum germplasm for medicinal and tea use [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2022, 20(15): 5172-5188. | |
19 | 王启璋,王海滨,田洁. 基于主成分分析评价园林小菊资源在西宁地区的适应性[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2021,23(11): 62-72. |
WANG Q Z, WANG H B, TIAN J. Adaptability evaluation of garden Chrysanthemum resources in xining based on PCA [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021, 23(11): 62-72. | |
20 | 林海明,杜子芳. 主成分分析综合评价应该注意的问题[J]. 统计研究,2013,30(8): 25-31. |
LIN H M, DU Z F. Some problems in comprehensive evaluation in the principal component analysis [J]. Statistical Res., 2013, 30(8): 25-31. | |
21 | 吴盼婷,王江民,沈佳逾,等. 不同菊花品种根系、地上部和叶片相关指标分析及抗逆性评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2017,26(2): 46-54. |
WU P T, WANG J M, SHEN J Y, et al.. Analyses on related indexes of root, above-ground part and leaf of different cultivars of Chrysanthemum morifolium and stress resistance evaluation [J]. J. Plant Resour. Environ., 2017, 26(2): 46-54. |
[1] | Pengfei LIU, Xiaoshuang LU, Dilimurat Reheman, Tangnur Slay, Yanying QU, Quanjia CHEN, Xiaojuan DENG. Genetic Variation Analysis of Main Quality Traits and Agronomic Traits in Upland Cotton Seed [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 22-32. |
[2] | Qianqian LU, Abuduwaili Abulimiti, Yixing HOU, Zhihui LI, Shuang WANG, Long ZHOU. Research of the Photosynthetic Characteristics of 7 Table Grape Varieties Under Compound Salt-alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 63-76. |
[3] | Shan HE, Wei HAN, Yuancheng ZHOU, Weili HAO, Zhixia LIU, Yafei LAN, Dongchen NA, Min CHAI, Yiling WANG. Main Agronomic Characters Analysis and High Quality Germplasm Selection of Introduced Fagopyrum esculentum Moench [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 22-31. |
[4] | Shuang WANG, Yixing HOU, Linjiao FENG, Qianqian LU, Long ZHOU. Effect of Drought Stress on Anatomical Structure of Leaves in Table Grape Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 40-49. |
[5] | Lifang ZHANG, Zhiyuan LI, Yuxiang LIU, Hongli ZHANG, Yong QIN. Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Composite Substrates on Growth Condition of Coriandrum sativum L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 204-214. |
[6] | Shulin ZHENG, Yutao SHI, Feiquan WANG, Bangqiang WU, Yuanhua LI, Bo ZHANG, Naixing YE. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Content of Mineral Elements in Flowers of Different Tea Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 178-188. |
[7] | Shengwei GUO, Siwen BIAN, Jianwen DING, Xiaochen ZHANG, Xing YANG, Jin DU, Chunyang XIANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Temperature Tolerance of Waxy Maize Varieties at Germination Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 38-47. |
[8] | Guanqun CHAI, Guihua LIU, Wei ZHOU, Xiujin ZHANG, Longpin LI, Chengwu FAN. Evaluation of Pollution Risk and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Greenhouse Soils in Wumeng Mountain Area, Guizhou Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 144-153. |
[9] | Xiaxia LI, Siyu ZHANG, Zhihui CHENG. Regional Trial Evaluation of High Quality Garlic Cultivars of China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 58-68. |
[10] | Guanglei CHENG, Jun QIU, Xiaoguang WANG, Tianjun XU, Chuanyong CHEN, Chunyuan ZHANG, Qianqian XIA, Yuanqi WU, Jiuran ZHAO, Ronghuan WANG. Changes of Agronomic Traits, Biomass Yield and Quality of National Silage Maize Combinations (Varieties) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 30-37. |
[11] | LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia. LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia* [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 21-32. |
[12] | LIU Qianjie, CHENG Yunxia, JIA Kai, SHI Zhenyu, ZHANG Jing, WEI Shaowei, WU Hui*. Influences of Nitrogen Application on Nitrogen Metabolism Enzymes Activities, Yield and Quality of Tomato in Composite Sand Culture [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 183-191. |
[13] | WANG Ying1, YU Yanghua2*. Evolution in the Spatio-temporal Pattern of Agricultural Sustainable Development Level in China Based on Multi-scales [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 8-17. |
[14] | LUO Lina1, HAN Shuquan1*, WANG Daigu1, LI Maofu2, MA Weihong3, ZHANG Zhengxue1, LIU Xiaocui1. Analysis and Evaluation of the Differences in Fruit Quality of Avocado [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 105-113. |
[15] | LI Gang, ZHENG Minna, LI Yinfan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Forage Oat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 42-53. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||