Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 39-49.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0174
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Boyan XIE1(), Lijing KONG1, Yubin ZHANG1, Chenglong SUN1, Siyuan ZHAO1, Minghui ZHANG1, Shengci FAN2, Zengxu XIANG3, Jinshuang ZHENG1(
)
Received:
2024-03-07
Accepted:
2024-06-21
Online:
2024-12-15
Published:
2024-12-17
Contact:
Jinshuang ZHENG
谢波艳1(), 孔丽静1, 张煜彬1, 孙成龙1, 赵思源1, 张明慧1, 范圣此2, 向增旭3, 郑金双1(
)
通讯作者:
郑金双
作者简介:
谢波艳E-mail:1797491496@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Boyan XIE, Lijing KONG, Yubin ZHANG, Chenglong SUN, Siyuan ZHAO, Minghui ZHANG, Shengci FAN, Zengxu XIANG, Jinshuang ZHENG. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis of Atractylodes chinensis[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(12): 39-49.
谢波艳, 孔丽静, 张煜彬, 孙成龙, 赵思源, 张明慧, 范圣此, 向增旭, 郑金双. 北苍术种质遗传多样性及群体结构分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(12): 39-49.
居群编号 Code of population | 种质编号 Code of germplasm | 株数 Number of plants | 来源 Origin |
---|---|---|---|
1 | S1~S3 | 3 | 承德市承德县石灰窑乡 Shihuiyao, Chengde,Chengde |
2 | S4~S17 | 14 | 赤峰市宁城县 Ningcheng, Chifeng |
3 | S18~S20 | 3 | 承德市宽城县 Kuancheng, Chengde |
4 | S21~S25 | 5 | 承德市承德县 Chengde, Chengde |
5 | S26~S33 | 8 | 秦皇岛市昌黎县 Changli, Qinhuangdao |
6 | S34~S40 | 7 | 承德市围场县 Weichang, Chengde |
7 | S41~S48 | 8 | 秦皇岛市青龙县天道河 Tiandao River, Qinglong, Qinhuangdao |
8 | S49 | 1 | 秦皇岛市青龙县木头凳 Mutoudeng, Qinglong, Qinhuangdao |
9 | S50~S52 | 3 | 承德市隆化县 Longhua, Chengde |
10 | S53~S60 | 8 | 承德市滦平县 Luanping, Chengde |
11 | S61~S75 | 15 | 承德市兴隆县 Xinglong, Chengde |
12 | S76~S94 | 19 | 承德市丰宁县 Fengning, Chengde |
13 | S95~S112 | 18 | 承德市平泉县 Pingquan, Chengde |
14 | S113~S136 | 24 | 赤峰市克什克腾旗 Hexigten, Chifeng |
15 | S137~S149 | 13 | 承德市隆化市 Longhua, Chengde |
16 | S150~S158 | 9 | 唐山市遵化市 Zunhua, Tangshan |
Table 1 Origin of 158 Atractylodes chinensis germplasms
居群编号 Code of population | 种质编号 Code of germplasm | 株数 Number of plants | 来源 Origin |
---|---|---|---|
1 | S1~S3 | 3 | 承德市承德县石灰窑乡 Shihuiyao, Chengde,Chengde |
2 | S4~S17 | 14 | 赤峰市宁城县 Ningcheng, Chifeng |
3 | S18~S20 | 3 | 承德市宽城县 Kuancheng, Chengde |
4 | S21~S25 | 5 | 承德市承德县 Chengde, Chengde |
5 | S26~S33 | 8 | 秦皇岛市昌黎县 Changli, Qinhuangdao |
6 | S34~S40 | 7 | 承德市围场县 Weichang, Chengde |
7 | S41~S48 | 8 | 秦皇岛市青龙县天道河 Tiandao River, Qinglong, Qinhuangdao |
8 | S49 | 1 | 秦皇岛市青龙县木头凳 Mutoudeng, Qinglong, Qinhuangdao |
9 | S50~S52 | 3 | 承德市隆化县 Longhua, Chengde |
10 | S53~S60 | 8 | 承德市滦平县 Luanping, Chengde |
11 | S61~S75 | 15 | 承德市兴隆县 Xinglong, Chengde |
12 | S76~S94 | 19 | 承德市丰宁县 Fengning, Chengde |
13 | S95~S112 | 18 | 承德市平泉县 Pingquan, Chengde |
14 | S113~S136 | 24 | 赤峰市克什克腾旗 Hexigten, Chifeng |
15 | S137~S149 | 13 | 承德市隆化市 Longhua, Chengde |
16 | S150~S158 | 9 | 唐山市遵化市 Zunhua, Tangshan |
性状 Trait | 特征(分级) Characteristic (grade) | 说明 Explanation |
---|---|---|
茎色SC | 浅绿(1)、中绿(2)、深绿(3) Light green (1), medium green (2), dark green (3) | — |
叶色LC | 浅绿(1)、中绿(2)、深绿(3) Light green (1), medium green (2), dark green (3) | — |
基部叶叶型BLT | 全缘(1)、浅裂(2)、深裂(3) Whole margin (1), shallow split (2), deep split (3) | 全缘:无缺口;浅裂:缺口低于叶片宽度2/1;深裂:缺口达到叶片宽度的2/1以上 Whole edge: no notch; split: the notch is less than 2/1 of the blade width; deep cracking: the notch reaches more than 2/1 of the width of the blade |
上部叶叶型ULT | 1个缺刻(1)、2个缺刻(2)、3个缺刻(3) 1 notch (1), 2 notchs (2), 3 notchs (3) | — |
分枝位置BP | 全株(1)、中上株(2)、上株(3) Whole strain (1), middle strain (2), upper strain (3) | — |
开花时期FP | 孕蕾期(1)、现蕾期(2)、开花期(3) Pregnancy period (1), current period (2), opening period (3) | 2022年7月10日,初花期调查开花时期情况 On July 10, 2022, the initial flowering period was investigated |
倒伏情况LC | 倒伏(1)、抗倒伏(2) Plunging (1), backing down (2) |
Table 2 Characteristics and grades of 7 quality traits
性状 Trait | 特征(分级) Characteristic (grade) | 说明 Explanation |
---|---|---|
茎色SC | 浅绿(1)、中绿(2)、深绿(3) Light green (1), medium green (2), dark green (3) | — |
叶色LC | 浅绿(1)、中绿(2)、深绿(3) Light green (1), medium green (2), dark green (3) | — |
基部叶叶型BLT | 全缘(1)、浅裂(2)、深裂(3) Whole margin (1), shallow split (2), deep split (3) | 全缘:无缺口;浅裂:缺口低于叶片宽度2/1;深裂:缺口达到叶片宽度的2/1以上 Whole edge: no notch; split: the notch is less than 2/1 of the blade width; deep cracking: the notch reaches more than 2/1 of the width of the blade |
上部叶叶型ULT | 1个缺刻(1)、2个缺刻(2)、3个缺刻(3) 1 notch (1), 2 notchs (2), 3 notchs (3) | — |
分枝位置BP | 全株(1)、中上株(2)、上株(3) Whole strain (1), middle strain (2), upper strain (3) | — |
开花时期FP | 孕蕾期(1)、现蕾期(2)、开花期(3) Pregnancy period (1), current period (2), opening period (3) | 2022年7月10日,初花期调查开花时期情况 On July 10, 2022, the initial flowering period was investigated |
倒伏情况LC | 倒伏(1)、抗倒伏(2) Plunging (1), backing down (2) |
序号 Code | 引物名称Primer name | 重复基序 Repeat motif | 正向引物序列 Forward primer sequence(5’‒3’) | 反向引物序列 Reverse primer sequence(5’‒3’) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | bcz4 | (TGG)6 | AGCTCCTGGAAATGGAGGAT | GATGGATCCTAGCACCCTGA |
2 | bcz8 | (AGA)5 | CTTTCCATCTTGGATGCGAT | CCAAACTCCACATCGAATGA |
3 | bcz9 | (TC)7 | TCCAATTGCAAGGGAAAAAC | TCCATTGATGAAGCTTGTCG |
4 | bcz11 | (GGT)7 | CTCCGGCTCTAAACCAGTTG | AAGGCAGTTCCCTTTTGGAT |
5 | bcz35 | (CTT)5 | GCTTCCTCAACATCGTAGCC | GATAGGCGAGAACCGGTGTA |
6 | bcz36 | (CTG)5 | CTCATGCTCGCAATCACATT | CTCCGGACGGTTTAAAATCA |
7 | bcz39 | (GAT)7 | ACTCCTGCTTATGCGGTGTC | AGGAATCGCTTTCGGTTTTC |
8 | bcz43 | (GA)6 | CGACAGAGTCCTTCATGGGT | CTTCGACGAACTCGACAACA |
9 | bcz45 | (A)10 | ATGGACCGAAAAGTTGGACA | TTGGCCTCTTTTTAGGAGGG |
10 | bcz48 | (CGG)6 | CCGCTACACACCCTGACTCT | CAGCCGGAGCTTAGTCAAAC |
11 | bcz50 | (CTC)5 | ATGGCCCTTCTCTGTCTCCT | CAGAGTTGGAGAAGGCTTGG |
12 | bcz51 | (T)10 | CTTCTCGTGTTGCTTCCGAT | CTCTCGGCTGGAGATCAAAC |
13 | bcz52 | (ATG)6 | GGTTGGACAAAGCGATCATT | AACCGACGCTTCTCTCCTTT |
14 | bcz53 | (AG)6 | CCGCCCCTGAGCTACTATCT | TGGCGACACATTTTCGTGAA |
15 | bcz56 | (GAG)5 | AGCTCCATCGTTTTGTGAGG | GTTGAAAATGCTGCTGGTGA |
16 | bcz99 | (AGA)5 | TGCGACCCACTGCATTTAGT | CCCATCCCCTCCACAACTTC |
17 | bcz102 | (T)11 | ACATCGTCGGGTTTGACTCC | ACCAATTTCTTGAATTTCCATTTCCA |
Table 3 17 pairs of SSR core primers information
序号 Code | 引物名称Primer name | 重复基序 Repeat motif | 正向引物序列 Forward primer sequence(5’‒3’) | 反向引物序列 Reverse primer sequence(5’‒3’) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | bcz4 | (TGG)6 | AGCTCCTGGAAATGGAGGAT | GATGGATCCTAGCACCCTGA |
2 | bcz8 | (AGA)5 | CTTTCCATCTTGGATGCGAT | CCAAACTCCACATCGAATGA |
3 | bcz9 | (TC)7 | TCCAATTGCAAGGGAAAAAC | TCCATTGATGAAGCTTGTCG |
4 | bcz11 | (GGT)7 | CTCCGGCTCTAAACCAGTTG | AAGGCAGTTCCCTTTTGGAT |
5 | bcz35 | (CTT)5 | GCTTCCTCAACATCGTAGCC | GATAGGCGAGAACCGGTGTA |
6 | bcz36 | (CTG)5 | CTCATGCTCGCAATCACATT | CTCCGGACGGTTTAAAATCA |
7 | bcz39 | (GAT)7 | ACTCCTGCTTATGCGGTGTC | AGGAATCGCTTTCGGTTTTC |
8 | bcz43 | (GA)6 | CGACAGAGTCCTTCATGGGT | CTTCGACGAACTCGACAACA |
9 | bcz45 | (A)10 | ATGGACCGAAAAGTTGGACA | TTGGCCTCTTTTTAGGAGGG |
10 | bcz48 | (CGG)6 | CCGCTACACACCCTGACTCT | CAGCCGGAGCTTAGTCAAAC |
11 | bcz50 | (CTC)5 | ATGGCCCTTCTCTGTCTCCT | CAGAGTTGGAGAAGGCTTGG |
12 | bcz51 | (T)10 | CTTCTCGTGTTGCTTCCGAT | CTCTCGGCTGGAGATCAAAC |
13 | bcz52 | (ATG)6 | GGTTGGACAAAGCGATCATT | AACCGACGCTTCTCTCCTTT |
14 | bcz53 | (AG)6 | CCGCCCCTGAGCTACTATCT | TGGCGACACATTTTCGTGAA |
15 | bcz56 | (GAG)5 | AGCTCCATCGTTTTGTGAGG | GTTGAAAATGCTGCTGGTGA |
16 | bcz99 | (AGA)5 | TGCGACCCACTGCATTTAGT | CCCATCCCCTCCACAACTTC |
17 | bcz102 | (T)11 | ACATCGTCGGGTTTGACTCC | ACCAATTTCTTGAATTTCCATTTCCA |
性状 Trait | 表型指标 Phenotypic index | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异系数CV/% | Shannon-Weiner多样性指数H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数量性状 Quantitative trait | 株高PH/cm | 98.00 | 39.00 | 68.58 | 13.65 | 19.90 | 1.13 |
主茎粗SW/mm | 6.13 | 1.92 | 3.29 | 0.86 | 26.02 | 2.59 | |
冠幅CB/cm | 136.00 | 25.00 | 54.00 | 19.76 | 36.00 | 2.36 | |
叶长LL/cm | 11.50 | 4.60 | 7.56 | 1.40 | 18.53 | 1.47 | |
叶宽LW/cm | 6.50 | 2.20 | 3.80 | 0.94 | 24.81 | 2.20 | |
茎数NS | 43.00 | 2.00 | 17.06 | 15.27 | 89.54 | 0.95 | |
质量性状 Qualitative trait | 茎色SC | — | — | — | — | 0.97 | 0.71 |
叶色LC | — | — | — | — | 0.93 | 1.61 | |
分枝位置BP | — | — | — | — | 1.44 | 1.25 | |
倒伏情况LC | — | — | — | — | 0.63 | 1.41 | |
开花时期FP | — | — | — | — | 1.23 | 1.23 | |
基生叶叶型BLT | — | — | — | — | 1.27 | 1.31 | |
上部叶叶型ULT | — | — | — | — | 2.13 | 0.58 | |
平均Mean | — | — | — | — | 35.80 | 1.37 |
Table 4 Phenotypic of 158 Atractylodes chinensis germplasms
性状 Trait | 表型指标 Phenotypic index | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异系数CV/% | Shannon-Weiner多样性指数H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
数量性状 Quantitative trait | 株高PH/cm | 98.00 | 39.00 | 68.58 | 13.65 | 19.90 | 1.13 |
主茎粗SW/mm | 6.13 | 1.92 | 3.29 | 0.86 | 26.02 | 2.59 | |
冠幅CB/cm | 136.00 | 25.00 | 54.00 | 19.76 | 36.00 | 2.36 | |
叶长LL/cm | 11.50 | 4.60 | 7.56 | 1.40 | 18.53 | 1.47 | |
叶宽LW/cm | 6.50 | 2.20 | 3.80 | 0.94 | 24.81 | 2.20 | |
茎数NS | 43.00 | 2.00 | 17.06 | 15.27 | 89.54 | 0.95 | |
质量性状 Qualitative trait | 茎色SC | — | — | — | — | 0.97 | 0.71 |
叶色LC | — | — | — | — | 0.93 | 1.61 | |
分枝位置BP | — | — | — | — | 1.44 | 1.25 | |
倒伏情况LC | — | — | — | — | 0.63 | 1.41 | |
开花时期FP | — | — | — | — | 1.23 | 1.23 | |
基生叶叶型BLT | — | — | — | — | 1.27 | 1.31 | |
上部叶叶型ULT | — | — | — | — | 2.13 | 0.58 | |
平均Mean | — | — | — | — | 35.80 | 1.37 |
指标 Index | 株高 PH | 主茎粗SW | 基生叶叶型BLT | 叶长 LL | 叶宽 LW | 上部叶叶型ULT | 茎数 NS | 茎色 SC | 叶色 LC | 分枝位置BP | 倒伏情况LC | 花期 FP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主茎粗SW | 0.24* | |||||||||||
基生叶叶型BLT | 0.13 | 0.13 | ||||||||||
叶长LL | 0.19* | 0.23 | 0.54 | |||||||||
叶宽LW | 0.33* | 0.10* | 0.02* | 0.45 | ||||||||
上部叶叶型ULT | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.04* | 0.53* | 0.07 | |||||||
茎数NS | 0.16* | -0.14 | 0.04 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.15 | ||||||
茎色SC | 0.00 | -0.13 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.12 | 0.09 | |||||
叶色LC | 0.11 | -0.09 | -0.13 | -0.13 | -0.07 | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.14 | ||||
分枝位置BP | 0.05 | -0.11 | -0.01 | -0.16 | -0.12* | -0.12 | 0.19* | -0.13 | 0.16* | |||
倒伏情况LC | -0.21 | 0.25* | 0.02 | -0.04 | -0.03 | -0.02 | 0.05 | -0.03 | -0.14 | 0.03 | ||
花期FP | -0.04 | -0.04 | -0.03 | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.07 | 0.13 | 0.01 | -0.05 | -0.10 | |
冠幅CB | 0.38* | -0.20 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.47* | 0.13 | 0.23* | 0.02 | -0.35* | 0.10 |
Table 5 Correlation analysis among phenotypic characters of Atractylodes chinensis germplasms
指标 Index | 株高 PH | 主茎粗SW | 基生叶叶型BLT | 叶长 LL | 叶宽 LW | 上部叶叶型ULT | 茎数 NS | 茎色 SC | 叶色 LC | 分枝位置BP | 倒伏情况LC | 花期 FP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主茎粗SW | 0.24* | |||||||||||
基生叶叶型BLT | 0.13 | 0.13 | ||||||||||
叶长LL | 0.19* | 0.23 | 0.54 | |||||||||
叶宽LW | 0.33* | 0.10* | 0.02* | 0.45 | ||||||||
上部叶叶型ULT | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.04* | 0.53* | 0.07 | |||||||
茎数NS | 0.16* | -0.14 | 0.04 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.15 | ||||||
茎色SC | 0.00 | -0.13 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.12 | 0.09 | |||||
叶色LC | 0.11 | -0.09 | -0.13 | -0.13 | -0.07 | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.14 | ||||
分枝位置BP | 0.05 | -0.11 | -0.01 | -0.16 | -0.12* | -0.12 | 0.19* | -0.13 | 0.16* | |||
倒伏情况LC | -0.21 | 0.25* | 0.02 | -0.04 | -0.03 | -0.02 | 0.05 | -0.03 | -0.14 | 0.03 | ||
花期FP | -0.04 | -0.04 | -0.03 | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.07 | 0.13 | 0.01 | -0.05 | -0.10 | |
冠幅CB | 0.38* | -0.20 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.47* | 0.13 | 0.23* | 0.02 | -0.35* | 0.10 |
指标 | 第1主成分 | 第2主成分 | 第3主成分 | 第4 | 第5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高PH | 0.62 | 0.38 | ‒0.22 | ‒0.31 | 0.28 |
主茎粗MS | 0.64 | ‒0.41 | ‒0.31 | ‒0.12 | 0.36 |
基部叶叶型BLT | 0.83 | ‒0.25 | ‒0.03 | ‒0.05 | 0.14 |
叶长LL | 0.61 | 0.36 | ‒0.44 | ‒0.11 | ‒0.41 |
叶宽LW | 0.85 | ‒0.12 | ‒0.16 | 0.08 | ‒0.05 |
上部叶叶型ULT | 0.64 | 0.05 | 0.47 | 0.23 | ‒0.05 |
茎数NS | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.68 | ‒0.05 | ‒0.15 |
茎色SC | 0.31 | ‒0.12 | 0.30 | 0.69 | 0.33 |
叶色LC | -0.44 | 0.47 | ‒0.19 | ‒0.03 | 0.67 |
分枝位置BP | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.27 | ‒0.40 | ‒0.10 |
倒伏情况LC | 0.06 | ‒0.40 | 0.68 | ‒0.13 | 0.08 |
开花时期FP | ‒0.02 | 0.28 | ‒0.37 | 0.73 | ‒0.24 |
冠幅CB | 0.20 | 0.80 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.19 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 3.38 | 2.12 | 1.87 | 1.41 | 1.08 |
贡献率 | 26.03 | 16.34 | 14.39 | 10.85 | 8.34 |
累计贡献率 | 26.03 | 42.37 | 56.76 | 67.61 | 75.94 |
Table 6 Principal component analysis of Atractylodes chinensis
指标 | 第1主成分 | 第2主成分 | 第3主成分 | 第4 | 第5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高PH | 0.62 | 0.38 | ‒0.22 | ‒0.31 | 0.28 |
主茎粗MS | 0.64 | ‒0.41 | ‒0.31 | ‒0.12 | 0.36 |
基部叶叶型BLT | 0.83 | ‒0.25 | ‒0.03 | ‒0.05 | 0.14 |
叶长LL | 0.61 | 0.36 | ‒0.44 | ‒0.11 | ‒0.41 |
叶宽LW | 0.85 | ‒0.12 | ‒0.16 | 0.08 | ‒0.05 |
上部叶叶型ULT | 0.64 | 0.05 | 0.47 | 0.23 | ‒0.05 |
茎数NS | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.68 | ‒0.05 | ‒0.15 |
茎色SC | 0.31 | ‒0.12 | 0.30 | 0.69 | 0.33 |
叶色LC | -0.44 | 0.47 | ‒0.19 | ‒0.03 | 0.67 |
分枝位置BP | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.27 | ‒0.40 | ‒0.10 |
倒伏情况LC | 0.06 | ‒0.40 | 0.68 | ‒0.13 | 0.08 |
开花时期FP | ‒0.02 | 0.28 | ‒0.37 | 0.73 | ‒0.24 |
冠幅CB | 0.20 | 0.80 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.19 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 3.38 | 2.12 | 1.87 | 1.41 | 1.08 |
贡献率 | 26.03 | 16.34 | 14.39 | 10.85 | 8.34 |
累计贡献率 | 26.03 | 42.37 | 56.76 | 67.61 | 75.94 |
引物名称Primer name | 条带数 Band number | 多态性条带Polymorphic band | 多态率 Polymorphism rate/% | Nei’s基因 多样性指数h | 多态信息量 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bcz4 | 8 | 7 | 87.50 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 0.75 |
bcz8 | 5 | 5 | 100.00 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
bcz9 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.66 |
bcz11 | 9 | 8 | 88.89 | 0.27 | 0.42 | 0.78 |
bcz35 | 4 | 3 | 75.00 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.70 |
bcz36 | 2 | 1 | 50.00 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.30 |
bcz39 | 8 | 7 | 87.50 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.74 |
bcz43 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 0.41 | 0.60 | 0.80 |
bcz45 | 5 | 5 | 100.00 | 0.41 | 0.60 | 0.77 |
bcz48 | 5 | 4 | 80.00 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.71 |
bcz50 | 10 | 9 | 90.00 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.82 |
bcz51 | 9 | 9 | 100.00 | 0.30 | 0.47 | 0.86 |
bcz52 | 10 | 9 | 90.00 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 0.79 |
bcz53 | 7 | 6 | 85.71 | 0.37 | 0.53 | 0.82 |
bcz56 | 13 | 13 | 100.00 | 0.24 | 0.39 | 0.83 |
bcz99 | 10 | 8 | 80.00 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.82 |
bcz102 | 11 | 10 | 90.91 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.83 |
总计Total | 128 | 116 | — | — | — | — |
平均Mean | 7.53 | 6.82 | 88.56 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.75 |
Table 7 Amplification characterization of 17 pairs of SSR primers
引物名称Primer name | 条带数 Band number | 多态性条带Polymorphic band | 多态率 Polymorphism rate/% | Nei’s基因 多样性指数h | 多态信息量 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bcz4 | 8 | 7 | 87.50 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 0.75 |
bcz8 | 5 | 5 | 100.00 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
bcz9 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.66 |
bcz11 | 9 | 8 | 88.89 | 0.27 | 0.42 | 0.78 |
bcz35 | 4 | 3 | 75.00 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.70 |
bcz36 | 2 | 1 | 50.00 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.30 |
bcz39 | 8 | 7 | 87.50 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.74 |
bcz43 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 0.41 | 0.60 | 0.80 |
bcz45 | 5 | 5 | 100.00 | 0.41 | 0.60 | 0.77 |
bcz48 | 5 | 4 | 80.00 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.71 |
bcz50 | 10 | 9 | 90.00 | 0.28 | 0.43 | 0.82 |
bcz51 | 9 | 9 | 100.00 | 0.30 | 0.47 | 0.86 |
bcz52 | 10 | 9 | 90.00 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 0.79 |
bcz53 | 7 | 6 | 85.71 | 0.37 | 0.53 | 0.82 |
bcz56 | 13 | 13 | 100.00 | 0.24 | 0.39 | 0.83 |
bcz99 | 10 | 8 | 80.00 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.82 |
bcz102 | 11 | 10 | 90.91 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.83 |
总计Total | 128 | 116 | — | — | — | — |
平均Mean | 7.53 | 6.82 | 88.56 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.75 |
1 | 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:一部 [S].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:168-169. |
2 | 朱文婷,陆美霞,丁燕,等.基于UPLC-Q-TOF-MS "建昌帮" 蜜糠炒苍术炮制前后化学成分分析[J].中南药学,2023,21(7):1756-1762. |
ZHU W T, LU M X, DING Y, et al.. Chemical components of fried Atractylodes Rhizoma with honey bran based on UPLC-Q-TOF-MS before and after the processing [J]. Cent. South Pharm., 2023,21(7):1756-1762. | |
3 | 贺字典,韩亚梅,金歌,等.木霉菌协同杀菌剂防治北苍术白绢病的增效作用[J].中国生物防治学报,2023,39(5):1244-1252. |
HE Z D, HAN Y M, JIN G, et al.. Synergistic effect of Trichoderma and fungicides on Atractylodes chinensis southern blight caused by Sclerotium rolfsii [J]. Chin.J. Biol. Contr., 2023,39(5):1244-1252. | |
4 | 于学霖,贾琳,尹海波,等.辽宁省北苍术生态适宜性和品质区划研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2023,30(8):1-7. |
YU X L, JIA L, YIN H B, et al.. Study on ecological suitability and quality regionalization of Atractylodes chinensis (DC.) Koidz. in Liaoning province [J]. Chin. J. Inf. Tradit. Chin. Med., 2023,30(8):1-7. | |
5 | 于艳,袁媛,贾天柱,等.苍术炮制前后化学成分及药理作用研究近况[J].时珍国医国药,2016,27(1):189-191. |
6 | 许静,孟利娜,南楠,等.北苍术多糖的酶法辅助超声提取工艺的优化及其体外抗肿瘤活性研究[J].现代药物与临床,2014,29(3):231-235. |
XU J, MENG L N, NAN N, et al.. Optimization of enzymatic auxiliary ultrasonic extraction of polysaccharide from Atractylodes chinensis and its antitumor activity in vitro [J]. Drugs Clin., 2014,29(3):231-235. | |
7 | 李涵秋,杜靖艳,满孜拉·吐达吉,等.基于HPLC优化北苍术三种药用成分提取及测定方法[J].中国农学通报,2023,39(11):43-49. |
LI H Q, DU J Y, Tudaji Manzila, et al.. Three medicinal ingredients of Atractylodes chinensis (DC.) Koidz: extraction and determination based on HPLC [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2023,39(11):43-49. | |
8 | SHIMATO Y, OTA M, ASAI K, et al.. Comparison of byakujutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) and sojutsu (Atractylodes lancea rhizome) on anti-inflammatory and immunostimulative effects in vitro [J] . J. Nat. Med., 2018,72(1):192-201. |
9 | 郑金双,王文颇,李彦生.温度与基质含水量对北苍术种子萌发及幼苗形态建成的影响[J].中药材,2018,41(6):1282-1284. |
10 | REN C G, DAI C C. Jasmonic acid is involved in the signaling pathway for fungal endophyte-induced volatile oil accumulation of Atractylodes lancea plantlets [J/OL]. BMC Plant Biol., 2012,12:128 [2024-02-10]. . |
11 | 陈璐,邢德科,吴沿友,等.不同基质对茅苍术移栽组培苗叶片导水度及光合的影响[J].种子,2021,40(2):7-12, 19. |
CHEN L, XING D K, WU Y Y, et al.. Effects of different substrates on leaf water conductivity and photosynthesis of tissue culture plantlets of Atractylodes lancea [J]. Seed, 2021,40(2):7-12, 19. | |
12 | 张炜坤,赵恢,张小芳,等.北苍术组织培养与快繁技术研究[J].种子,2018,37(12):136-139. |
ZHANG W K, ZHAO H, ZHANG X F, et al.. Study on tissue culture and rapid propagation techniques of Atractylodes chinensis (DC.) Koidz [J]. Seed, 2018,37(12):136-139. | |
13 | SUN J, WENG L, XIAO C P, et al.. Quality analysis of Atractylodes chinensis with different growth years by HPLC-QAMS combined with color difference principle [J]. Chin. Phar., 2020,31(11):1314-1319. |
14 | 左静静,闫贵云,安晓宁,等.正交设计优化北苍术组织培养研究[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(11):21-24. |
ZUO J J, YAN G Y, AN X N, et al.. Tissue culture of Atractylodes chinensis by orthogonal design [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2017,33(11):21-24. | |
15 | ISHII T, OKUYAMA T, NOGUCHI N, et al.. Antiinflammatory constituents of Atractylodes chinensis rhizome improve glomerular lesions in immunoglobulinA nephropathy model mice [J]. J. Nat. Med., 2020,74(1):51-64. |
16 | 郭欣慰,乔旭,李艾莲.河北省青龙地区北苍术叶型变异模式初探[J].河北农业科学,2021,25(3):76-80, 90. |
GUO X W, QIAO X, LI A L. Preliminary study on leaf type variation pattern of Atractylodes chinensis in Qinglong, Hebei province [J]. J. Hebei Agric. Sci., 2021,25(3):76-80, 90. | |
17 | 姜雨昕,肖春萍,孙金,等.基于ISSR标记的北苍术种质资源亲缘关系分析[J].种子,2021,40(12):32-38. |
JIANG Y X, XIAO C P, SUN J, et al.. Genetic relationship analysis of Atractylodes chinensis germplasm resources based on ISSR markers [J]. Seed, 2021,40(12):32-38. | |
18 | MA S S, ZHAO J H, SU W N, et al.. Transcriptome-derived SSR markers for DNA fingerprinting and inter-populations genetic diversity assessment of Atractylodes chinensis [J] . Nucleus, 2022,65(3):321-329. |
19 | ZHAO J, SUN C, SHI F, et al.. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis among 1-,2- and 3-year old Atractylodes chinensis [J/OL]. BMC Plant Biol., 2021,21(1):354 [2024-02-10].. |
20 | 李锦超,董俊美,贾凯旋,等.基于山药转录组测序的EST-SSR信息分析及分子标记开发[J/OL].分子植物育种,2022:1-18[2024-02-10]., |
DONG J M, JIA K X, et al.. EST-SSR information analysis and molecular marker development based on Chinese yam transcriptome sequencing [J/OL]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2022:1-18 [2024-02-10]. . | |
21 | 邹学哲,邓红,吴嘉琳,等.基于变异系数权重法评价3种干燥方式对铁皮石斛多糖理化性质的影响[J].广东药科大学学报,2023,39(4):87-92. |
ZOU X Z, DENG H, WU J L, et al.. Evaluation of the effects of three drying methods on physicochemical properties of Dendrobium officinale polysaccharides based on coefficient of variation weighting method [J]. J. Guangdong Pharm. Univ., 2023,39(4):87-92. | |
22 | 尹光耀,袁林,王馨,等.北苍术特异性DNA条形码筛选、种质鉴定及遗传多样性分析[J].药学学报,2023,58(6):1693-1704. |
YIN G Y, YUAN L, WANG X, et al.. Screening of specific DNA barcode, identification of germplasm eesources, and analysis of genetic diversity of Atractylodes chinenesis [J]. Acta Pharm. Sin., 2023,58(6):1693-1704. | |
23 | 陈慧玲,刘华,黄国伟,等.湖北16个山桐子野生资源分布区叶片形态多样性分析[J].中国农学通报,2023,39(5):63-68. |
CHEN H L, LIU H, HUANG G W, et al..Leaf morphological diversity of Idesia polycarpa Maxim in sixteen wild resource distribution areas in Hubei province [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2023,39(5):63-68. | |
24 | 赵慧琴.数据处理技术与SPSS实验教程[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2016:1-180. |
25 | 张茹,吴昌娟,张丽君,等.基于形态性状和指标成分的远志遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J].核农学报,2022,36(12):2381-2390. |
ZHANG R, WU C J, ZHANG L J, et al.. Genetic diversity and comprehensive evaluation of Polygala tenuifolia based on morphological traits and indicative components [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2022,36(12):2381-2390. | |
26 | EVANNO G, REGNAUT S, GOUDET J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE:a simulation study [J]. Mol. Ecol., 2005,14(8):2611-2620. |
27 | YANG X H, GAO S B, XU S T, et al.. Characterization of a global germplasm collection and its potential utilization for analysis of complex quantitative traits in maize [J]. Mol. Breeding, 2011,28(4):511-526. |
28 | 李瑞峰,高鹏,朱子成,等.基于形态学标记及 SSR 标记的甜瓜主栽品种分类鉴定研究[J].中国蔬菜,2014(6):20-27. |
LI R F, GAO P, ZHU Z C, et al.. Studies on classification and identification based on morphological markers and SSR markers for elite varieties of Cucumis melo L. [J]. China Veg., 2014(6):20-27. | |
29 | 贺漫媚,代色平,陈秀萍,等.17种石斛属植物表型性状多样性分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2024(2):33-39. |
HE M M, DAI S P, CHEN X P, et al.. Analysis on phenotypic trait diversity of 17 Dendrobium species [J]. J. Plant Res. Environ., 2024(2):33-39. | |
30 | 刘庭付,周大云,缪叶旻子.丽水市野生豆腐柴叶片形态多样性研究[J].中国野生植物资源,2023,42(2):45-50. |
LIU T F, ZHOU D Y, MIAO Y M Z. Study on morphological diversity of wild Premna microphylla in Lishui city [J]. Chin. Wild Plant Resour., 2023,42(2):45-50. | |
31 | 尹跃,安巍,赵建华,等.黑果枸杞转录组SSR信息分析及分子标记开发[J].浙江农林大学学报,2019,36(2):422-428. |
YIN Y, AN W, ZHAO J H, et al.. SSR information in transcriptome and development of molecular markers in Lycium ruthenicum [J]. J. Zhejiang A&F Univ., 2019,36(2):422-428. | |
32 | 黄海燕,杜红岩,乌云塔娜,等.基于杜仲转录组序列的SSR分子标记的开发[J].林业科学,2013,49(5):176-181. |
HUANG H Y, DU H Y, DU H Y,et al.. Development of SSR molecular markers based on transcriptome sequencing of Eucommia ulmoides [J]. Sci. Silvae Sin., 2013,49(5):176-181. | |
33 | 宋芸,张鑫瑞,贺嘉欣,等.基于叶绿体SSR分子标记的苦参种质资源遗传多样性分析[J].作物杂志,2023(1):30-37. |
SONG Y, ZHANG X R, HE J X, et al.. Genetic diversity analysis of Sophora flavescens Ait. germplasm resources based on cpSSR markers [J]. Crops, 2023(1):30-37. | |
34 | 王若溪,常婧,曲凯伦,等.酸枣经济性状关联分析及优异等位基因挖掘[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(6):28-39. |
WANG R X, CHANG J, QU K L, et al.. Association analysis of economic traits and mining of excellent alleles of Ziziphus jujuba var. Spinosa [J]. J. Northwest A&F Univ.(Nat. Sci.), 2023,51(6):28-39. | |
35 | 刘亚令,耿雅萍,解潇冬,等.基于SSR分子标记的药用黄芪遗传多样性与遗传结构分析[J].草地学报,2019,27(5):1154-1162. |
LIU Y L, GENG Y P, XIE X D, et al.. Genetic diversity and genetic structure analysis of Astragalus based on SSR molecular marker [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2019,27(5):1154-1162. | |
36 | 宋江琴,唐楠,唐道城,等.基于表型性状和SSR标记的9份万寿菊种质遗传多样性分析[J].种子,2021,40(10):6-11, 19. |
SONG J Q, TANG N, TANG D C, et al.. Genetic diversity analysis of 9 marigold germplasms based on phenotypic traits and SSR markers [J]. Seed, 2021,40(10):6-11, 19. |
[1] | Shan GAO, Xiaocui YAN, Nan WANG, Mengjie ZHANG, Youpeng LI, Wenda DIAO, Huijun DUAN. Genetic Diversity Analysis of 255 Maize Germplasm Resources Based on 10K SNP Chip [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 20-33. |
[2] | Xianyin SUN, Qiuhuan MU, Yong MI, Guangde LYU, Xiaolei QI, Yingying SUN, Xundong YIN, Ruixia WANG, Ke WU, Zhaoguo QIAN, Yan ZHAO, Minggang GAO. Classification and Evaluation of New Wheat Lines Based on GT Biplot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 14-24. |
[3] | Yutao SHI, Huizhen XIE, Shulin ZHENG, Guanhua YU, Feiquan WANG, Li LI, Bo ZHANG, Yuanhua LI, Shengcai LUO. Analysis of Biochemical Characteristics and Superoxide Anion Radical Scavenging Activity of Tea Polysaccharides of Local Tea Germplasms in Wuyishan [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 65-76. |
[4] | Ziwen KONG, Ruxia TIAN, Ruyi MIAO, Yanping LIANG. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Genetic Diversity of 60 Screw Pepper Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 40-47. |
[5] | Tingting CAO, Chun LIU, Youwei FAN, Li MA, Zhiyu REN, Suxia YUAN, Junyun ZHANG, Zunyao QIAN, Guangzhao YANG. Effects of Different Nitrogen Supply Level on Plant Growth and Development in Miniature Potted Rose [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 67-79. |
[6] | Yuan HE, Xiaotong GU, Liqing FENG, Huijun DUAN, Yongsheng TAO. Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance Index for Maize Hybrids During Seedling and Germination Stages [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 30-40. |
[7] | Shengmei LI, Bo PANG, Shiwei GENG, Wu SONG, Hongmei LI, Maosen MA, Ru ZHANG, Xinyan WANG, Wenwei GAO. Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Gossypium hirsutum L. × Gossypium barbadense L. Backross Populations in Full Boll Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 40-51. |
[8] | Nali XU, Huixia YU, Mingming YAO, Yanqing WANG, Qingfeng LI, Caixia LIU, Gang SUN, Jiajing CHEN, Jiaohui LONG, Zhangjun WANG. Analysis of Genetic Diversity Based on SSR and SRAP Markers and Agronomic Traits of Wheat Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 30-46. |
[9] | Xingfu WU, Fangchan JIAO, Xuejun CHEN, Zhiyu FANG, Guanghai ZHANG, Yihan ZHANG, Yongping LI. Phenotypic Genetic Diversity Analysis of Leaf Shrinkage and Economic Traits of Flue-cured Tobacco for Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 54-64. |
[10] | Shengchuan LIU, Yingfen XU, Jie WEI, Donghai YAN, Zhixiong CHEN, lin XU, Yan LIU, Yufeng ZHOU. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Albino Tea Cultivars (Strains) Using 2b-RAD Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 65-73. |
[11] | Chenke CUI, Tao LIN, Yanbo AN, Peng CUI. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Different Characteristics of Sweetpotato Varieties by ISSR Molecular Marker [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 68-75. |
[12] | Xixi ZUO, Yingjie SONG, Xinyan MA, Yunhui YANG, Yifei WANG, Zeguang GUO, Xiongzhi ZHU, Yue LIU. Mining SSR Loci and Analysis the Genetic Diversity of Tartary Buckwheat Based on the Whole Genome Sequence [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 38-51. |
[13] | Saiqun WEN, Lingdi LIU, Wei TIAN, Xiaoliang XIE, Dongsheng JIA, Ming LIU, Chunxiu WEN, Tao JIANG. Identification of Perilla Germplasm for Both Medicinal and Edible Leaves [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(10): 62-70. |
[14] | Tao ZHANG, Haiyun SONG, Peng HE, Yuanrong WEI, Peng XU, Qiujin TAN, Shufang ZHENG, Zhenshi QIN, Yuming LU, Wenlin WANG. Analysis and Evaluation of Amino Acid Composition in Different Macadamiaternifolia Germplasm [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 119-127. |
[15] | LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia. LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia* [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 21-32. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||