Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 68-77.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0733
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lingang XIAO1,2(), Yan MA1(
), Xufeng WANG2, Jianfei XING2, Jianchao ZHENG3, Yuehong MA1
Received:
2023-10-07
Accepted:
2023-11-22
Online:
2025-04-15
Published:
2025-04-15
Contact:
Yan MA
肖林刚1,2(), 马艳1(
), 王旭峰2, 邢剑飞2, 郑剑超3, 马月虹1
通讯作者:
马艳
作者简介:
肖林刚E-mail:447551316@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Lingang XIAO, Yan MA, Xufeng WANG, Jianfei XING, Jianchao ZHENG, Yuehong MA. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Substrate Moisture Content on Morphological Regulation and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Cucumber Seedlings[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 68-77.
肖林刚, 马艳, 王旭峰, 邢剑飞, 郑剑超, 马月虹. 补光光质和基质含水量对黄瓜幼苗形态调节和光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(4): 68-77.
处理 Treatment | 光质设置 Light quality setting | 水分含量 Moisture content/% |
---|---|---|
L1W1 | 白红2∶1 White and red 2∶1 | 55 |
L1W2 | 75 | |
L1W3 | 95 | |
L2W1 | 全白光All white | 55 |
L2W2 | 75 | |
L2W3 | 95 | |
L3W1 | 白红蓝 2∶1∶1 White, red and blue 2∶1∶1 | 55 |
L3W2 | 75 | |
L3W3 | 95 | |
CK | 自然光Natural light | 75 |
Table 1 Treatments of light and water
处理 Treatment | 光质设置 Light quality setting | 水分含量 Moisture content/% |
---|---|---|
L1W1 | 白红2∶1 White and red 2∶1 | 55 |
L1W2 | 75 | |
L1W3 | 95 | |
L2W1 | 全白光All white | 55 |
L2W2 | 75 | |
L2W3 | 95 | |
L3W1 | 白红蓝 2∶1∶1 White, red and blue 2∶1∶1 | 55 |
L3W2 | 75 | |
L3W3 | 95 | |
CK | 自然光Natural light | 75 |
处理Treatment | 株高 SH/cm | 茎粗 SD/mm | 最大叶面积 MLA/cm2 | 壮苗指数 SI | 根冠比 Root to shoot ratio | SPAD | 叶片相对含水率 RWC/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | W1 | 14.67±1.26 e | 3.78±0.30 b | 56.81±3.30 bc | 0.45±0.05 bc | 0.219±0.009 ab | 53.58±3.10 ab | 0.87±0.01 ab |
W2 | 21.83±2.02 ab | 4.03±0.21 ab | 55.69±8.31 c | 0.45±0.06 bc | 0.214±0.023 abc | 56.21±4.15 a | 0.86±0.08 ab | |
W3 | 21.83±1.53 ab | 4.13±0.06 ab | 69.48±11.10 ab | 0.45±0.02 bc | 0.169±0.003 d | 54.78±3.20 ab | 0.87±0.02 ab | |
L2 | W1 | 18.33±1.53 cd | 4.24±0.30 a | 61.00±4.13 abc | 0.46±0.02 bc | 0.233±0.032 a | 53.65±3.18 ab | 0.88±0.03 a |
W2 | 21.67±1.15 ab | 4.03±0.16 ab | 58.97±7.72 bc | 0.50±0.04 ab | 0.199±0.017 bcd | 55.20±3.20 ab | 0.86±0.03 ab | |
W3 | 23.50±1.73 a | 4.33±0.18 a | 65.39±5.32 abc | 0.48±0.06 b | 0.188±0.016 bcd | 54.68±3.20 ab | 0.85±0.02 ab | |
L3 | W1 | 15.93±1.89 de | 4.03±0.19 ab | 54.84±8.29 c | 0.43±0.03 bc | 0.213±0.009 abc | 53.08±3.05 ab | 0.81±0.04 ab |
W2 | 19.43±1.44 bc | 3.96±0.07 ab | 55.00±2.74 c | 0.40±0.02 c | 0.194±0.014 bcd | 54.88±1.68 ab | 0.83±0.03 ab | |
W3 | 19.50±2.29 bc | 4.23±0.19 a | 73.67±3.12 a | 0.55±0.01 a | 0.208±0.01 abc | 56.61±2.06 a | 0.81±0.02 ab | |
CK | 18.07±1.04 cd | 3.86±0.15 ab | 72.27±10.51 a | 0.42±0.13 bc | 0.172±0.010 cd | 50.97±2.24 b | 0.72±0.01 b |
Table 2 Morphological indicators and chlorophyll content of cucumber seedlings under different treatments
处理Treatment | 株高 SH/cm | 茎粗 SD/mm | 最大叶面积 MLA/cm2 | 壮苗指数 SI | 根冠比 Root to shoot ratio | SPAD | 叶片相对含水率 RWC/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | W1 | 14.67±1.26 e | 3.78±0.30 b | 56.81±3.30 bc | 0.45±0.05 bc | 0.219±0.009 ab | 53.58±3.10 ab | 0.87±0.01 ab |
W2 | 21.83±2.02 ab | 4.03±0.21 ab | 55.69±8.31 c | 0.45±0.06 bc | 0.214±0.023 abc | 56.21±4.15 a | 0.86±0.08 ab | |
W3 | 21.83±1.53 ab | 4.13±0.06 ab | 69.48±11.10 ab | 0.45±0.02 bc | 0.169±0.003 d | 54.78±3.20 ab | 0.87±0.02 ab | |
L2 | W1 | 18.33±1.53 cd | 4.24±0.30 a | 61.00±4.13 abc | 0.46±0.02 bc | 0.233±0.032 a | 53.65±3.18 ab | 0.88±0.03 a |
W2 | 21.67±1.15 ab | 4.03±0.16 ab | 58.97±7.72 bc | 0.50±0.04 ab | 0.199±0.017 bcd | 55.20±3.20 ab | 0.86±0.03 ab | |
W3 | 23.50±1.73 a | 4.33±0.18 a | 65.39±5.32 abc | 0.48±0.06 b | 0.188±0.016 bcd | 54.68±3.20 ab | 0.85±0.02 ab | |
L3 | W1 | 15.93±1.89 de | 4.03±0.19 ab | 54.84±8.29 c | 0.43±0.03 bc | 0.213±0.009 abc | 53.08±3.05 ab | 0.81±0.04 ab |
W2 | 19.43±1.44 bc | 3.96±0.07 ab | 55.00±2.74 c | 0.40±0.02 c | 0.194±0.014 bcd | 54.88±1.68 ab | 0.83±0.03 ab | |
W3 | 19.50±2.29 bc | 4.23±0.19 a | 73.67±3.12 a | 0.55±0.01 a | 0.208±0.01 abc | 56.61±2.06 a | 0.81±0.02 ab | |
CK | 18.07±1.04 cd | 3.86±0.15 ab | 72.27±10.51 a | 0.42±0.13 bc | 0.172±0.010 cd | 50.97±2.24 b | 0.72±0.01 b |
处理Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间 CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | W1 | 9.38±3.40 bc | 0.083±0.050 cd | 204.56±24.55 d | 2.102±0.531 e |
W2 | 12.12±2.00 ab | 0.121±0.059 bcd | 289.11±26.79 a | 2.849±1.191 de | |
W3 | 10.47±4.22 abc | 0.089±0.026 cd | 228.23±27.53 cd | 2.881±1.471 de | |
L2 | W1 | 9.01±1.75 bc | 0.061±0.017 d | 152.36±23.55 e | 2.615±0.620 de |
W2 | 13.36±3.41 a | 0.130±0.045 abc | 218.9±37.73 d | 5.667±1.400 bc | |
W3 | 12.69±2.14 ab | 0.083±0.023 cd | 177.83±29.37 e | 4.570±0.966 cd | |
L3 | W1 | 6.78±2.80 c | 0.073±0.031 cd | 234.94±2.33 bcd | 4.451±1.673 cd |
W2 | 11.53±3.08 ab | 0.163±0.056 ab | 261.45±26.63 ab | 6.741±1.721 ab | |
W3 | 12.02±2.05 ab | 0.190±0.077 a | 264.50±22.43 ab | 7.971±1.740 a | |
CK | 11.38±2.49 ab | 0.148±0.047 ab | 240.59±21.85 abc | 5.816±1.378 ab |
Table 3 Photosynthetic parameters of cucumber seedling leaves under different treatments
处理Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间 CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | W1 | 9.38±3.40 bc | 0.083±0.050 cd | 204.56±24.55 d | 2.102±0.531 e |
W2 | 12.12±2.00 ab | 0.121±0.059 bcd | 289.11±26.79 a | 2.849±1.191 de | |
W3 | 10.47±4.22 abc | 0.089±0.026 cd | 228.23±27.53 cd | 2.881±1.471 de | |
L2 | W1 | 9.01±1.75 bc | 0.061±0.017 d | 152.36±23.55 e | 2.615±0.620 de |
W2 | 13.36±3.41 a | 0.130±0.045 abc | 218.9±37.73 d | 5.667±1.400 bc | |
W3 | 12.69±2.14 ab | 0.083±0.023 cd | 177.83±29.37 e | 4.570±0.966 cd | |
L3 | W1 | 6.78±2.80 c | 0.073±0.031 cd | 234.94±2.33 bcd | 4.451±1.673 cd |
W2 | 11.53±3.08 ab | 0.163±0.056 ab | 261.45±26.63 ab | 6.741±1.721 ab | |
W3 | 12.02±2.05 ab | 0.190±0.077 a | 264.50±22.43 ab | 7.971±1.740 a | |
CK | 11.38±2.49 ab | 0.148±0.047 ab | 240.59±21.85 abc | 5.816±1.378 ab |
处理 Treatment | 过氧化氢酶 CAT /(nmol•min-1•g-1) | 过氧化物酶 POD/(U•g-1) | 超氧化物歧化酶 SOD/(U•g-1) | 丙二醛 MDA/(nmol•g-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | W1 | 204.70±4.98 b | 8 413.7±321.3 bcd | 114.30±4.96 b | 31.43±0.93 a |
W2 | 50.37±0.58 h | 11 462.0±1 376.61 a | 163.23±2.76 a | 26.20±1.78 b | |
W3 | 154.07±4.54 c | 6 441.7±1 924.7 cde | 101.90±4.62 c | 28.87±0.99 a | |
L2 | W1 | 85.93±7.77 f | 3 483.3±1 140.8 e | 80.20±2.10 d | 23.57±1.68 bc |
W2 | 79.20±10.77 g | 5 608.0±3 353.7 de | 98.07±5.07 c | 22.27±2.20 c | |
W3 | 140.07±10.85 cd | 7 848.3±1 480.6 bcd | 86.13±2.16 d | 21.70±1.50 c | |
L3 | W1 | 219.67±3.55 a | 7 196.7±500.8 bcd | 102.97±6.23 c | 23.13±1.32 bc |
W2 | 101.30±0.69 e | 7 250.7±429.1 bcd | 117.47±4.74 b | 23.73±1.01 bc | |
W3 | 118.53±3.36 d | 8 835.0±824.8 abc | 101.43±8.40 c | 24.90±1.04 bc | |
CK | 87.87±10.56 ef | 9 124.7±961.5 ab | 62.43±3.88 e | 19.50±3.14 d |
Table 4 MDA content and antioxidant enzyme activity in cucumber seedling leaves under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 过氧化氢酶 CAT /(nmol•min-1•g-1) | 过氧化物酶 POD/(U•g-1) | 超氧化物歧化酶 SOD/(U•g-1) | 丙二醛 MDA/(nmol•g-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | W1 | 204.70±4.98 b | 8 413.7±321.3 bcd | 114.30±4.96 b | 31.43±0.93 a |
W2 | 50.37±0.58 h | 11 462.0±1 376.61 a | 163.23±2.76 a | 26.20±1.78 b | |
W3 | 154.07±4.54 c | 6 441.7±1 924.7 cde | 101.90±4.62 c | 28.87±0.99 a | |
L2 | W1 | 85.93±7.77 f | 3 483.3±1 140.8 e | 80.20±2.10 d | 23.57±1.68 bc |
W2 | 79.20±10.77 g | 5 608.0±3 353.7 de | 98.07±5.07 c | 22.27±2.20 c | |
W3 | 140.07±10.85 cd | 7 848.3±1 480.6 bcd | 86.13±2.16 d | 21.70±1.50 c | |
L3 | W1 | 219.67±3.55 a | 7 196.7±500.8 bcd | 102.97±6.23 c | 23.13±1.32 bc |
W2 | 101.30±0.69 e | 7 250.7±429.1 bcd | 117.47±4.74 b | 23.73±1.01 bc | |
W3 | 118.53±3.36 d | 8 835.0±824.8 abc | 101.43±8.40 c | 24.90±1.04 bc | |
CK | 87.87±10.56 ef | 9 124.7±961.5 ab | 62.43±3.88 e | 19.50±3.14 d |
Fig. 1 Root morphology characteristics of cucumber seedlings under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 株高 SH | 茎粗SD | 叶面积MLA | 壮苗指数SI | 根冠比 Root to shoot ratio | SPAD | 相对含水率RWC | 净光合速率Pn | 气孔导度Gs | 胞间CO2浓度Ci | 蒸腾速率Tr | 过氧化氢酶CAT | 过氧化物酶POD | 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 丙二醛MDA | 根长RL | 根表面积RSA | 根系体积RV | 根尖数TN | 综合评价值Comprehensive evaluation value | 排名 Ranking | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | W1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.022 | 0.004 | 0.014 | 0.020 | 0.017 | 0.019 | 0.000 | 0.110 | 0.048 | 0.036 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.027 | 0.338 | 9 |
W2 | 0.032 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.019 | 0.008 | 0.014 | 0.040 | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.015 | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.071 | 0.017 | 0.031 | 0.020 | 0.014 | 0.048 | 0.517 | 3 | |
W3 | 0.032 | 0.007 | 0.025 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.014 | 0.028 | 0.022 | 0.027 | 0.015 | 0.074 | 0.029 | 0.028 | 0.008 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 0.052 | 0.044 | 0.490 | 4 | |
L2 | W1 | 0.016 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.028 | 0.004 | 0.015 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.026 | 0.018 | 0.019 | 0.013 | 0.016 | 0.249 | 10 |
W2 | 0.031 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.017 | 0.013 | 0.006 | 0.014 | 0.050 | 0.055 | 0.024 | 0.071 | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 0.030 | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 0.004 | 0.426 | 7 | |
W3 | 0.039 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.008 | 0.005 | 0.013 | 0.045 | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.049 | 0.064 | 0.042 | 0.017 | 0.032 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.023 | 0.006 | 0.439 | 5 | |
L3 | W1 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.019 | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.030 | 0.047 | 0.121 | 0.036 | 0.028 | 0.027 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.019 | 0.006 | 0.375 | 8 |
W2 | 0.021 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.036 | 0.081 | 0.039 | 0.092 | 0.036 | 0.037 | 0.039 | 0.025 | 0.008 | 0.046 | 0.087 | 0.000 | 0.578 | 2 | |
W3 | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.032 | 0.025 | 0.017 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.040 | 0.102 | 0.040 | 0.117 | 0.049 | 0.052 | 0.027 | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 0.026 | 0.014 | 0.636 | 1 | |
CK | 0.015 | 0.002 | 0.030 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.035 | 0.069 | 0.032 | 0.074 | 0.027 | 0.055 | 0.000 | 0.039 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.015 | 0.022 | 0.432 | 6 | |
变异系数 | 0.144 | 0.043 | 0.118 | 0.093 | 0.102 | 0.030 | 0.057 | 0.183 | 0.377 | 0.181 | 0.430 | 0.446 | 0.286 | 0.260 | 0.143 | 0.128 | 0.168 | 0.322 | 0.177 | |||
权重 | 0.039 | 0.012 | 0.032 | 0.025 | 0.028 | 0.008 | 0.015 | 0.050 | 0.102 | 0.049 | 0.117 | 0.121 | 0.077 | 0.071 | 0.039 | 0.035 | 0.046 | 0.087 | 0.048 |
Table 5 Comprehensive evaluation of membership functions of morphological regulation and photosynthetic characteristics of cucumber seedlings under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 株高 SH | 茎粗SD | 叶面积MLA | 壮苗指数SI | 根冠比 Root to shoot ratio | SPAD | 相对含水率RWC | 净光合速率Pn | 气孔导度Gs | 胞间CO2浓度Ci | 蒸腾速率Tr | 过氧化氢酶CAT | 过氧化物酶POD | 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 丙二醛MDA | 根长RL | 根表面积RSA | 根系体积RV | 根尖数TN | 综合评价值Comprehensive evaluation value | 排名 Ranking | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | W1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.022 | 0.004 | 0.014 | 0.020 | 0.017 | 0.019 | 0.000 | 0.110 | 0.048 | 0.036 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.027 | 0.338 | 9 |
W2 | 0.032 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.019 | 0.008 | 0.014 | 0.040 | 0.048 | 0.049 | 0.015 | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.071 | 0.017 | 0.031 | 0.020 | 0.014 | 0.048 | 0.517 | 3 | |
W3 | 0.032 | 0.007 | 0.025 | 0.008 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.014 | 0.028 | 0.022 | 0.027 | 0.015 | 0.074 | 0.029 | 0.028 | 0.008 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 0.052 | 0.044 | 0.490 | 4 | |
L2 | W1 | 0.016 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.028 | 0.004 | 0.015 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.026 | 0.018 | 0.019 | 0.013 | 0.016 | 0.249 | 10 |
W2 | 0.031 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.017 | 0.013 | 0.006 | 0.014 | 0.050 | 0.055 | 0.024 | 0.071 | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 0.030 | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.019 | 0.004 | 0.426 | 7 | |
W3 | 0.039 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.008 | 0.005 | 0.013 | 0.045 | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.049 | 0.064 | 0.042 | 0.017 | 0.032 | 0.011 | 0.016 | 0.023 | 0.006 | 0.439 | 5 | |
L3 | W1 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.019 | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.030 | 0.047 | 0.121 | 0.036 | 0.028 | 0.027 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.019 | 0.006 | 0.375 | 8 |
W2 | 0.021 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.036 | 0.081 | 0.039 | 0.092 | 0.036 | 0.037 | 0.039 | 0.025 | 0.008 | 0.046 | 0.087 | 0.000 | 0.578 | 2 | |
W3 | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.032 | 0.025 | 0.017 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.040 | 0.102 | 0.040 | 0.117 | 0.049 | 0.052 | 0.027 | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 0.026 | 0.014 | 0.636 | 1 | |
CK | 0.015 | 0.002 | 0.030 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.035 | 0.069 | 0.032 | 0.074 | 0.027 | 0.055 | 0.000 | 0.039 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.015 | 0.022 | 0.432 | 6 | |
变异系数 | 0.144 | 0.043 | 0.118 | 0.093 | 0.102 | 0.030 | 0.057 | 0.183 | 0.377 | 0.181 | 0.430 | 0.446 | 0.286 | 0.260 | 0.143 | 0.128 | 0.168 | 0.322 | 0.177 | |||
权重 | 0.039 | 0.012 | 0.032 | 0.025 | 0.028 | 0.008 | 0.015 | 0.050 | 0.102 | 0.049 | 0.117 | 0.121 | 0.077 | 0.071 | 0.039 | 0.035 | 0.046 | 0.087 | 0.048 |
1 | 杨亚娜,樊小雪,徐刚,等.不同红蓝LED光照强度和灌溉量交互作用对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2019,31(5):737-745. |
YANG Y N, FAN X X, XU G, et al.. Effects of different red and blue LED light intensity and irrigation and their interactions on growth of tomato seedlings [J]. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2019,31(5):737-745. | |
2 | 翟丙年,郑险峰,杨岩荣,等.植物生长调节物质的研究进展[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(6):1069-1075. |
ZHAI B N, ZHENG X F, YANG Y R,et al..The research progresses of plant growth substances [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2003,23(6):1069-1075. | |
3 | 申宝营,李毅念,赵三琴,等.暗期补光对黄瓜幼苗形态调节效果及综合评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(22):201-208. |
SHEN B Y, LI Y N, ZHAO S Q, et al.. Effect of dark period lighting regulation on cucumber seedling morphology and comprehensive evaluation analysis and comprehensive evaluation [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2014,30(22):201-208. | |
4 | BLOM T, KEREC D, BROWN W, et al.. Irrigation method and temperature of water affect height of potted easter lilies [J]. HortScience, 2004, 39(1):71-74. |
5 | GARNER L C, lANGTON F A. Brushing pansy (Viola tricolor L.) transplants: a flexible, effective method for controlling plant size [J]. Sci. Hortic., 1997,70(2-3):187-195. |
6 | 崔馨元,赵瑞,陈俊琴.不同波段紫外辐射增强对黄瓜穴盘苗生长发育的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2010,41(9):31-34. |
CUI X Y, ZHAO R, CHEN J Q. Effect of different UV radiation bands on growth and development of cucumber plug seedlings [J]. J. Northeast Agric. Univ., 2010,41(9):31-34. | |
7 | HOGEWONING S W, TROUWBORST G, MALJAARS H, et al.. Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis,morphology,and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light [J].J.Exp. Bot.,2010,61(11):3107-3117. |
8 | 孙洪助,孙文华,刘士辉,等.不同光质对作物形态建成和生长发育的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(27):17-20. |
SUN H Z, SUN W H, LIU S H, et al.. Effect of light quality on formation and growth of crops [J].J. Anhui Agric. Sci.,2015,43(27):17-20. | |
9 | MORROW R C. LED lighting in horticulture [J]. HortScience, 2008, 43(7): 1947-1950. |
10 | PARK Y, RUNKLE E S. Spectral effects of light-emitting diodes on plant growth,visual color quality,and photosynthetic photon efficacy:white versus blue plus red radiation [J/OL].PLoS One,2018,13(8):e0202386 [2023-09-06].. |
11 | YAN Z N, HE D X, NIU G H, et al.. Evaluation of growth and quality of hydroponic lettuce at harvest as affected by the light intensity,photoperiod and light quality at seedling stage [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2019,248:138-144. |
12 | PARK Y, RUNKLE E S. Investigating the merit of including far-red radiation in the production of ornamental seedlings grown under sole-source lighting [J]. Acta Hortic., 2016, 1134: 259-266. |
13 | KIM H H, GOINS G D, WHEELER R M, et al.. Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red- and blue-light-emitting diodes [J]. HortScience,2004,39(7):1617-1622. |
14 | 季方,甘佩典,刘男,等.LED光质和日累积光照量对番茄种苗生长及能量利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(22):231-238. |
JI F, GAN P D, LIU N, et al.. Effects of LED spectrum and daily light integral on growth and energy use efficiency of tomato seedlings [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2020,36(22):231-238. | |
15 | 梁贝贝,温江丽,李灵芝,等.植物工厂LED光源环境下黄瓜幼苗生长和需水规律[J].中国蔬菜,2018(10):25-29. |
LIANG B B, WEN J L, LI L Z,et al..Studies on cucumber seedling growth and water requirement regulation under environment with LED light source in plant factory [J].China Veget., 2018(10):25-29. | |
16 | 陈俊琴,赵瑞.不同基质相对含水量对黄瓜穴盘苗叶片水分生理与光合特性的影响[J].农业工程技术,2017,37(4):20-22. |
17 | 冯嘉玥,邹志荣,陈修斌.土壤水分对温室春黄瓜苗期生长与生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(6):1242-1245. |
FENG J Y, ZOU Z R, CHEN X B. Effect of soil moisture on growth and physiological characteristics of greenhouse spring cucumber during seedling period [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin.,2005, 25(6):1242-1245. | |
18 | 郭永青,李建明,邹志荣,等.不同补充灌溉量对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J].西北农业学报,2010,19(4):169-172. |
GUO Y Q, LI J M, ZOU Z R,et al..Effects of different supplementary irrigation on growth of tomato seedlings [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2010,19(4):169-172. | |
19 | 李建明,王平,李江.灌溉量对亚低温下温室番茄生理生化与品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(2):129-134. |
LI J M, WANG P, LI J. Effect of irrigation amount on physiology,biochemistry and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato under sub-low temperatures [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2010,26(2):129-134. | |
20 | 裴孝伯,李世诚,张福墁,等.温室黄瓜叶面积计算及其与株高的相关性研究[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(8):80-82. |
PEI X B, LI S C, ZHANG F M,et al..Study on leaf area calculation and its correlation with plant height of cucumber in greenhouse [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci.Bull., 2005,21(8):80-82. | |
21 | 高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:15-17. |
22 | 郝建军,康宗利,于洋.植物生理学实验技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007: 101-103. |
23 | 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2000:192-201. |
24 | 马沛勤,陈莉,陈俊. Cu2+胁迫下三种蔬菜四种抗氧化生理指标的变化[J].北方园艺,2013(10):11-14. |
MA P Q, CHEN L, CHEN J.Study on the Cu2+ stress on physiological and biochemical index in three kinds of vegetables [J]. Northern Hortic., 2013(10):11-14. | |
25 | ZHANG Y, SHI Y, GONG H J, et al.. Beneficial effects of silicon on photosynthesis of tomato seedlings under water stress [J]. J. Integr. Agric., 2018, 17(10): 2151-2159. |
26 | 齐红岩,李天来,曲春秋,等.亏缺灌溉对设施栽培番茄物质分配及果实品质的影响[J].中国蔬菜,2004(2):10-12. |
QI H Y, LI T L, QU C Q, et al.. Effects of deficit irrigation on dry matter distribution and fruit quality of tomato in protected cultivation [J]. China Veget., 2004(2):10-12. | |
27 | 许大全,高伟,阮军.光质对植物生长发育的影响[J].植物生理学报,2015,51(8):1217-1234. |
XU D Q, GAO W, RUAN J. Effects of light quality on plant growth and development [J]. Plant Physiol. J., 2015,51(8):1217-1234. | |
28 | 祁娟霞,刘馨,赵小兵,等.不同灌水量和灌水频率对番茄植株生长、光合与荧光特性的影响[J].节水灌溉,2017(4):50-56. |
QI J X, LIU X, ZHAO X B, et al.. Effects of different irrigation amount and irrigation frequency on the growth,photosynthesis and fluorescence characteristics of tomato [J]. Water Sav. Irrig., 2017(4):50-56. | |
29 | 何建文. LED间歇光照在黄瓜、番茄育苗上的应用研究[D].广州:华南农业大学,2018. |
HE J W. Effect of LED intermittent light on seeding of cucumber and tomato [D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2018. | |
30 | 李璇,岳红,王升,等.影响植物抗氧化酶活性的因素及其研究热点和现状[J].中国中药杂志,2013,38(7):973-978. |
LI X, YUE H, WANG S,et al..Research of different effects on activity of plant antioxidant enzymes [J]. China J. Chin. Mater. Med., 2013,38(7):973-978. | |
31 | 冯敬涛,刘照霞,徐新翔,等.海藻提取物对干旱胁迫下苹果砧木幼苗抗旱性和养分吸收的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(5):79-85. |
FENG J T, LIU Z X, XU X X,et al..Effects of seaweed extract on drought resistance and nutrient absorption of apple rootstock seedlings under drought stress [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2020,38(5):79-85. | |
32 | KHOYERDI F F, SHAMSHIRI M H, ESTAJI A.Changes in some physiological and osmotic parameters of several pistachio genotypes under drought stress [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2016,198:44-51. |
[1] | Yanxia MA, Jingru CHEN, Xiaowei WANG, Yuxin ZHANG, Junfeng ZHANG, Jialin KUAI. Effects of Irrigation Lower Limit and Fertilizer Application Amount on Water Consumption and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Mini Chinese Cabbage Under Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 239-249. |
[2] | Mei WU, Jinzhu ZHANG, Zhenhua WANG, Jian LIU, Yue WEN, Xuanzhi LI. Effects of Water and Air Interaction on Physiological Growth and Yield of Maize Under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 189-200. |
[3] | Yue HUANG, Yanfen XIE, Xuanquan ZHU, Meng JIA, Ge WANG, Yuxiang BAI, Yu DU, Peng ZHOU, Yuting ZHAO, Hongqiong ZHU, Fan YANG, Zhiwen XIAO, Wenbo WANG, Zhipeng FANG, Jiabao HAN, Na WANG. Risk Assessment and Influencing Factors Analysis of Chlorine Content in Tobacco Leaves in Tobacco Planting Areas [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 206-213. |
[4] | Yi ZHANG, Jun HE, Baolong ZHANG, Caijun ZHANG, Xuehua GAN. Effects of Slow-release Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Water Use of Rice Under Rain-storing Intermittent Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 195-205. |
[5] | Li JIA, Juan CHEN, Shanyu YONG, Xiaowen LI, Weiqin LIANG. Effects of Amount and Frequency of Drip Irrigation Under Plastic Film on Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Growth and Water Use Efficiency in Semi-arid Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 176-184. |
[6] | Ling YANG, Fucang ZHANG, Xin SUN, Shaohui ZHANG, Haidong WANG, Ahmed Elsayed ABDELGHANY, Zhanfei CHEN, Yuchuan FANG. Effects of Biochar and Drip Irrigation Amounts on Soil Properties and Growth of Potato in Blown-sand Region of Northern Yulin, Shaanxi Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 221-233. |
[7] | Shunsheng WANG, Yingquan YAO, Yidan HUANG, Chengyu YANG, Jinyue YANG, Hao ZHANG. Quality Evaluation of Irrigation and Fertilization for Winter Wheat Under Wide Ridge and Furrow Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 145-157. |
[8] | Xuejin YANG, Yuanyuan ZHOU, Xinyi PENG, Jianfeng LIU, Aimin ZHANG, Aiqin JING, Gangyong ZHAO, Dandan CAO. Comparative Analysis of Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Community Structure Between Root-knot Nematode Diseased and Healthy Cucumber [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 109-118. |
[9] | Jie ZHENG, Hong CHEN, Lingjian MENG, Shanjun LI, Luchang MA. Effect of Different Emitter Types on Anti-clogging Performance of Biogas Slurry Concentrations [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 108-116. |
[10] | Xuejing LIU, Xiaoyuan BAO, Xiaoyang HOU, Wenchao ZHEN. Dynamics of Soil Water Content and Yield Formation Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Water Limited Irrigation in Spring in Haihe Plain [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 167-176. |
[11] | Zhenjia HE, Tongle SHI, Yuliang FU, Liangjun FEI. Effect of Emitter Spacing on Nitrogen Transport Characteristics of Intersecting Two Point Sources in Bubbled-root Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 157-169. |
[12] | Yue GU, Jinggui WU. Study on Dynamic Effects of Organic Materials on Soil Carbon, Nitrogen and Microbial Biomass [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 126-133. |
[13] | Baoshi LI, Wenke LIU, Qi WANG, Mingjie SHAO. Effect of Soil-ridged Substrate-embedded Cultivation on Root Zone Temperature, Growth and Yield of Cucumber in Chinese Solar Greenhouse in Summer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 177-183. |
[14] | Yuanyuan DING, Xi’ao WANG, Ce LIU, Shuju LI, Zhihui CHENG. Establishment of Comprehensive Evaluation and Prediction Equation for Cucumber Wet-cold Tolerance at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(11): 87-96. |
[15] | LI Baoshi, LIU Wenke, WANG Qi, ZHA Lingyan, ZHANG Yubin, ZHOU Chengbo, SHAO Mingjie. Influences of DMPP on the Cucumber Yield and Root Zone Greenhouse Gas Emission under Different Cultivation Methods [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 184-192. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||