液态有机肥部分替代化肥对设施番茄根区细菌群落的影响

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0244

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究液态有机肥部分替代化肥对设施番茄根区细菌群落的影响，以化学冲施肥为对照（T_CK），设置液态有机肥分别替代20%（T_R20）、30%（T_R30）和40%化学冲施肥（T_R40）3个处理，应用16S rRNA 高通量测序技术，分析番茄根区土壤样本中细菌的群落多样性、结构组成和差异。结果表明，在97%的相似水平下，共发现3 747个OTU，37个门，104个纲，268个目，441个科，730个属，1 401个种。3个处理和对照样品中共有OTU为1 338个，独有的OTU数值分别为140（T_R20）、129（T_R30）和263（T_R40）。T_R30处理的细菌丰富度和多样性最高，其优势菌门为变形菌门（Proteobacteria）、绿弯菌门（Chloroflexi）、酸杆菌门（Acidobacteria）、厚壁菌门（Firmicutes）；优势菌属为norank_c_subgroup_6、芽孢杆菌属（Bacillus）、norank_f_A4b。通过聚类分析、主成分分析、非度量多维尺度分析和共现性网络分析发现， T_R30和对照处理细菌的菌落组成相似度较高，共性最大。利用PICRUSt软件对细菌群落功能组成进行预测，发现各处理土壤样本的主要COG功能组成较为相似，但各COG相对丰度有所差异。综上所述，液态有机肥不同比例替代化学冲施肥能增加外源细菌种类，改变丰富度、多样性和菌落组成，以替代30%比例时效果最佳，为液态有机肥与化学冲施肥配施提供了理论依据。

关键词: 设施番茄, 液态有机肥, 化学冲施肥, 细菌, 群落结构

Abstract:

In order to study the effect of partial substitution of liquid organic fertilizer for chemical fertilizer on the bacterial community in the root zone of greenhouse tomato， chemical flushing fertilization was used as control （T_CK）， liquid organic fertilizer was set to replace 20% （T_R20）、30%（T_ R30） and 40% （T_R40） chemical flushing. 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology was used to analyze the diversity， structural composition and differences of bacterial communities in different treatments. The results showed that， at 97% similarity level， 3 747 OTU， 37 phylas， 104 classes， 268 orders， 441 families， 730 genera and 1 401 species were found. There were shared 1 338 OUT in 4 treatments， and there were 140， 129 and 263 unique OTU values in T_R20， T_R30 and T_R40 treatments， respectively. The diversity of bacterial communities in T_R30 treatment was higher than other treatments， and the dominant phylums were Proteobacteria， Chloroflexi， Acidobacteria and Firmicutes， while the dominant genera were norank_c_subgroup_6、Bacillus and norank_f_A4b. Through cluster analysis， principal component analysis， non metric multi-dimensional scale analysis and co-occurrence network analysis， it was found that there were high similarity of bacterial composition between T_CK and T_R30 treatments. By PICRUSt software package， the functional composition of bacterial community showed that the main COGs were similar among four treatments， but the relative abundance of each COG changed. In conclusion， the different proportions of liquid organic fertilizer instead of chemical flushing fertilizer could increase the species of exogenous bacteria， change the richness， diversity and colony composition. And the effect of T_R30 treatment was the most excellent， which provided a theoretical basis for liquid organic fertilizer to replace chemical flushing fertilization.

Key words: greenhouse tomato, liquid organic fertilizer, inorganic fertilizer, bacterial, community structure

中图分类号:

S641.2

夏秀波, 李涛, 曹守军, 姚建刚, 王虹云, 张丽莉. 液态有机肥部分替代化肥对设施番茄根区细菌群落的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(7): 187-196.

Xiubo XIA, Tao LI, Shoujun CAO, Jiangang YAO, Hongyun WANG, Lili ZHANG. Effect of Liquid Organic Fertilizer Partial Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Bacterial Community in Greenhouse Tomato Root Zone[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 187-196.

图/表 12

表１不同处理的施肥量

Table 1 Fertilization amount of different treatments

处理 Treatment	肥料类型 Fertilization type		次数 Times
处理 Treatment	化学冲施肥 Chemical fertilizer /（kg·hm^-2）	液态有机肥 Liquid organic fertilizer /（kg·L^-1）	次数 Times
T_CK	90.0	0	5
T_R20	72.0	15.0	5
T_R30	63.0	22.5	5
T_R40	54.0	30.0	5

表2 样本信息统计表

Table 2 Sample information statistics chart

样本 Sample	序列数 Sequence No.	碱基数 Base No.	平均序列长度 Mean sequence length/bp	最短序列长度 Min sequence length/bp	最长序列长度 Max sequence length/bp
T_CK	67 708	28 279 629	417.67	244	535
T_R20	57 661	23 977 066	415.83	258	519
T_R30	54 144	22 647 083	418.28	283	506
T_R40	72 046	30 248 429	419.85	336	461

图1 细菌的Sobs稀释曲线

Fig. 1 Rarefaction Sobs curves of OTU numbers

表3 样本细菌多样性指数

Table 3 Diversity index of Bacteria in samples

样品Sample	覆盖度 Coverage	Ace指数 Ace index	Chao指数 Chao index	Shannon指数 Shannon index	Simpson指数 Simpson index	Sobs指数 Sobs index
T_CK	0.991 6 a	3 002.15 b	3 003.27 b	6.52 a	0.005 7 c	2 694 a
T_R20	0.990 5 a	2 745.79 d	2 739.96 d	6.41 a	0.004 8 c	2 441 c
T_R30	0.989 5 a	3 081.20 a	3 064.07 a	6.46 a	0.006 8 b	2 721 a
T_R40	0.992 0 a	2 886.29 c	2 911.51 c	6.15 b	0.011 2 a	2 544 b

图2 细菌OUT分布水平上的Venn图

Fig.2 Venn map of the level of bacteria OTU distribution

图3 门水平各样本中细菌群落组成注：Others为样本中丰度占比均小于1%的进行合并。

Fig. 3 Composition of bacterial community on Phylum levelNote： Others are the samples with abundance ratio less than 1%.

图4 属水平各样品中细菌群落组成注：Others为样本中丰度占比均小于1%的进行合并。

Fig. 4 Composition of bacterial community on Genus levelNote： Others are the samples with abundance ratio less than 1%.

图5 不同样本细菌群落OTU水平层级聚类树系图

Fig. 5 Hierarchical clustering tree of bacteria on OTU level

图6 细菌群落OTU水平主成分分析

Fig. 6 Principal component analysis of bacteria on OTU level

图7 基于相似性>97%的OTU 水平上细菌非度量多维度分析

Fig. 7 NMDS plot of bacteria on OTU levelbased on similarity > 97%

图8 细菌群落在属水平的网络分析注：图中默认显示丰度大于50%的物种。

Fig. 8 Network analysis of bacteria on Genus levelNote： Species with abundance greater than 50% are shown by default.

图9 细菌群落的COG功能分类和相对丰度

Fig. 9 COG function classification and relative abundance of bacteria

参考文献 33

1	张福锁.科学认识化肥的作用[J].中国农技推广,2017,33(1):16-19.
	ZHANG F S. Scientific understanding of the role of chemical fertilizer [J]. Chin. Agric. Technol. Extension, 2017, 33(1):16-19.
2	杨吉祥,马平平.浅谈农药化肥的负面作用及对策[J].中国园艺文摘,2009(6):158-160.
	YANG J X, MA P P. Discussion on the negative effects and countermeasures of pesticide and chemical fertilizer [J]. Chin. Hortic. Abstracts, 2009(6):158-160.
3	张迎春,颉建明,李静,等.生物有机肥部分替代化肥对莴笋及土壤理化性质和微生物的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):196-205.
	ZHANG Y C, XIE J M, LI J, et al.. Effects of partial substitution of chemical fertilizer by bioorganic fertilizer on asparagus lettuce and soil physical chemical properties and microorganisms [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2019, 33(4):196-205.
4	姜利红,谢桂先,刘强,等.有机无机肥配施对双季稻田土壤微生物和碳库的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,44(3):295-300.
	JIANG L H, XIE G X, LIU Q, et al.. Effect of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil microbial and carbon pool in double rice paddy field [J]. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2018, 44(3):295-300.
5	祝英,王治业,彭轶楠,等.有机肥替代部分化肥对土壤肥力和微生物特征的影响[J].土壤通报,2015,46(5):1161-1167.
	ZHU Y, WANG Z Y, PENG Y N, et al.. Changes of soil nutrients and microbial communities under the condition of organic fertilizers replacing part of chemical fertilizers [J]. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2015, 46(5):1161-1167.
6	李杰,贾豪语,颉建明,等.生物肥部分替代化肥对花椰菜产量、品质、光合特性及肥料利用率的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(1):47-55.
	LI J, JIA H Y, XIE J M, et al.. Effects of partial substitution of mineral fertilizer by bio-fertilizer on yield, quality, photosynthesis and fertilizer utilization rate in broccoli [J]. Acta Pratac. Sin., 2015, 24(1):47-55.
7	牛振明,张国斌,刘赵帆,等.生物肥部分替代化肥对甘蓝(Brassica oleracea)养分吸收、光合作用以及品质的影响[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(2):464-471.
	NIU Z M, ZHANG G B, LIU Z F, et al.. Effect of partial replacement of chemical fertilizer by bio-fertilizer on nutrient uptake photosynthesis and quality of Brassica oleracea [J]. J. Desert Res., 2014, 34(2):464-471.
8	徐全辉,高仰,赵强,等.活性腐殖酸有机肥对水稻产量、养分吸收的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010(8):3951-3952.
	XU Q H, GAO Y, ZHAO Q, et al.. Effect of humic acid fertilizer on rice yield and nutrient uptake [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2010, 38(8):3951-3952.
9	沈渊,沈新芬,姚明军.复合微生物液态有机肥在滴灌玉米上的应用效果研究[J].现代农业科技, 2020(15):9-11
	SHEN Y, SHEN X F, YAO M J. Study on application effect of compound microbial liquid organic fertilizer on drip irrigation corn [J]. Modern Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020(15):9-11.
10	徐海东,董合林,苏丽丽,等.液态有机肥对滴灌棉花光合特性及产量形成规律的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2017,33(20):71-77.
	XU H D, DONG H L, SU L L, et al.. Effects of liquid organic fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and yield formation of cotton under drip irrigation [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2017, 33(20):71-77.
11	熊湖,郑顺林,龚静等.液态有机肥对酚酸胁迫下马铃薯生长发育和土壤酶活性影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):254-259, 267.
	XIONG H, ZHENG S L, GONG J, et al.. Effects of liquid organic soil enzyme activities fertilizer on potato growth and under phenolic acid stress [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2019, 33(3):254-259, 267.
12	席天元,刘庆华,雷逢进,等.有机肥液态施入对番茄产量和品质的影响[J].山西农业科学,2014,42(7):697-700.
	XI T Y, LIU Q H, LEI F J, et al.. Impact of organic fertilizer drip fertigationed to tomato yield and quality [J]. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci., 2014, 42(7):697-700.
13	陶瑞,李锐,谭亮,等.减少化肥配施有机肥对滴灌棉花N、P吸收和产量的影响[J].棉花学报,2014,26(4):342-349.
	TAO R, LI R, TAN L, et al.. Effects of application of different organic manures with chemical fertilizer on cotton yield, N and P utilization efficiency under drip irrigation [J]. J. Cotton, 2014, 26(4):342-349.
14	孟琳,张小莉,蒋小芳,等.有机肥料氮替代部分化肥氮对稻谷产量的影响及替代率[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(2):532-542.
	MENG L, ZHANG X L, JIANG X F, et al.. Effects of partial mineral nitrogen substitution by organic fertilizer nitrogen on the yields of rice grains and their proper substitution rate [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2009, 42(2):532-542.
15	刘森.施肥年限对泡桐人工林土壤微生物群落结构和多样性的影响[D].昆明:中南林业科技大学,2017.
	LIU S. Effects of fertilization length on soil microbial community structure and diversity in paulownia plantations [D]. Kunming: Central south university of forestry and technology, 2017.
16	CHEN S F, ZHOU Y Q, CHEN Y R, et al.. An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor [J]. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34(17):884-890.
17	MAGOČ T, SALZBERG S L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies [J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(21):2957-2963.
18	EDGAR RC. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads [J]. Nat. Methods., 2013, 10(10):996-998.
19	STACKEBRANDT E, GOEBEL B M. Taxonomic Note: A place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology [J]. Int. J. System. Bacteriol., 1994, 44(4):846-849.
20	WANG Q, GARRITY G M, TIEDJE J M, et al.. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy [J]. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2007, 73(16):5261-5267.
21	HUANG L F, SONG L X, XIA X J, et al.. Plant-soil feedbacks and soil sickness: from mechanisms to application in agriculture [J]. J. Chem. Ecol., 2013, 39(2):232-242.
22	BERENDSEN R L, PIETERSE C M J, BAKKER P A H M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health [J]. Trends Plant Sci., 2012, 17(8):478-486.
23	张凯煜,谷洁,王小娟,等.微生物有机肥对樱桃园土壤细菌群落的影响[J].中国环境科学,2019, 39(3):1245-1252.
	ZHANG K Y, GU J, WANG X J, et al.. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on the soil bacterial community in a cherry orchard [J]. Chin. Environ. Sci., 2019, 39(3):1245-1252.
24	樊晓刚,金轲,李兆君,等.不同施肥和耕作制度下土壤微生物多样性研究进展[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(3):744-751.
	FAN X G, JIN K, LI Z J, et al.. Soil microbial diversity under different fertilization and tillage practices: A review [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2010, 16(3):744-751.
25	王宁,南宏宇,冯克云.化肥减量配施有机肥对棉田土壤微生物生物量、酶活性和棉花产量的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2020,31(1):173-181.
	WANG N, NAN H Y, FENG K Y. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer application on soil microbial bio-mass, enzyme activity and cotton yield [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2020, 31(1):173-181.
26	白亚丽.日光温室果菜有机肥替代及化肥减施对其生长和土壤环境的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2019.
	BAI L Y. 2020, The effects on fruit vegetables growth and the soil environment with replacement of organic fertilizer and fertilizer application in solar greenhouse [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2019.
27	王慧颖,徐明岗,周宝库,等.黑土细菌及真菌群落对长期施肥响应的差异及其驱动因素[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(5):914-925.
	WANG H Y, XU M G, ZHOU B K, et al.. Response and driving factors of bacterial and fungal community to long-term fertilization in black soil [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2018, 51(5):914-925.
28	曾希柏,王亚男,王玉忠,等.不同施肥模式对设施菜地细菌群落结构及丰度的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(1):69-79.
	ZENG X B, WANG Y N, WANG Y Z, et al.. Effects of different fertilization regimes on abundance and composition of the bacterial community in greenhouse vegetable soils [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2013, 46(1):69-79.
29	马晓英,马琨,周艳,等.土壤细菌群落组成对有机与无机培肥措施的响应[J].西北农业学报,2019,28(10):1698-1707.
	MA X Y, MA K, ZHOU Y, et al.. Response of Soil Bacteria Community Structure to Application of Inorganic and organic fertilizer [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2019, 28(10):1698-1707.
30	赵立君,刘云根,王妍,等.典型高原湖滨带底泥细菌群落结构及多样性特征[J].微生物学通报,2020,47(2):401-410.
	ZHAO L J, LIU Y G, WANG Y, et al.. Bacterial community structure and diversity of sediments in a typical plateau lakeshore [J]. Microbiol. China, 2020, 47(2):401-410.
31	王光华,刘俊杰,于镇华,等.土壤酸杆菌门细菌生态学研究进展[J].生物技术通报,2016,32(2):14-20.
	WANG G H, LIU J J, YU Z H, et al.. Research progress of Acidobacteria ecology in soils [J]. Biotechnol. Bull., 2016, 32(2):14-20.
32	于淑池.植物真菌病害生防芽孢杆菌的研究进展[J].通化师范学院学报,2007,28(8):52-54.
	YU S C. Research review of biocontrol bacillus for plant fungous diseases [J]. J. Tonghua Norm. Univ., 2007, 28(8):52-54.
33	陈志谊,张荣胜,刘邮洲,等.植物病害生防芽孢杆菌研究进展[J].江苏农业学报,2012,28(5):999-1006.
	CHEN Z Y, ZHANG R S, LIU Y Z, et al.. Research progress in biocontrol of Bacillus spp. against plant diseases [J]. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci., 2012, 28(5):999-1006.

[1]	闫宁, 战宇, 苗馨月, 王二刚, 陈长宝, 李琼. 强还原土壤灭菌处理对人参连作土壤细菌群落结构及土壤酶活的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 133-144.
[2]	田振祥, 丁伟, 程茁, 戴航宇. 大豆内生细菌的分离及其作用效果研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 47-57.
[3]	王莉莉, 殷丛培, 李峰, 杨志敏, 刘芳明, 林柏松, 刘晓静, 刘海军, 孙靖, 单东东, 崔江慧, 张振清. 马铃薯根际土壤细菌群落结构及其对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 58-69.
[4]	魏艳晨, 陈吉祥, 王永刚, 孟彤彤, 韩亚龙, 李美. 荒漠植物珍珠猪毛菜根际土壤细菌多样性与土壤理化性质相关性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 209-217.
[5]	刘璐1,名晓东1,张晓艳2,郝俊杰2,付丽平1,王乾坤1,吕鑫1,陈旺1,刘全兰1*. 高通量测序分析蚕豆种子内生细菌的多样性[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 73-80.
[6]	郁帆, 冯莹, 韩剑, 盛强, 孙丽英, 罗明, . 农用植物酵素液中梨树腐烂病菌拮抗细菌的筛选和防病效果[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12): 125-135.
[7]	殷全玉1,刘健豪1,刘国顺1,杨欣铃2,李小福2,张玉兰1,李阳1,叶红朝3*. 连续4年施用生物炭对植烟褐土微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(1): 176-185.
[8]	樊帆1,李正涛1,李世钰1,2,山云辉3,黄家雄4,吕玉兰4,何飞飞1,秦世雯1*. 云南热区咖啡种植地红壤细菌群落多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(8): 178-186.
[9]	孙康泰1,张建民2,蒋大伟3,王小龙4,葛毅强1,邓小明1*. 我国动物源细菌耐药性的研究进展及防控策略[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(5): 1-5.
[10]	高林1,王新伟1,申国明1,田峰2,陈前锋2,张明发2,张成省1*. 不同连作年限植烟土壤细菌和真菌群落结构差异[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 147-152.
[11]	张艺洁,邵惠芳*,张珂,贾宏昉,黄五星,韩丹. 基于高通量测序研究施肥对连作植烟土壤环境及微生物的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(5): 16-25.
[12]	龚治翔1,马晓寒1,任志广1,朱金峰2,黄元炯3,王蒙蒙1,陈征1,许自成1*. 连作烤烟根际土壤细菌群落16S rDNA-PCR-DGGE分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(2): 39-47.
[13]	王健,石晶. 基于趋化-改进粒子群算法的SVR光合速率预测模型[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(12): 74-82.
[14]	常安然1,李佳1,张耸1,占俊文2,魏登辉1,王佩雯1,于建军*. 基于宏基因组学16S rDNA测序对烟草根际土壤细菌群落组成分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(2): 43-50.
[15]	李新宇1,孜力汗1,2*,张宝会1,杨闯1,徐永平1,2,李淑英2. 噬菌体在水产养殖中应用的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(5): 187-192.