中国农业科技导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (7): 170-177.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0276
• 生物制造 资源生态 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2022-04-08
接受日期:
2022-06-06
出版日期:
2023-07-15
发布日期:
2023-08-25
通讯作者:
闫道良
作者简介:
吴雨露E-mail:1206195697@qq.com基金资助:
Yulu WU(), Jiaxin HU(
), Yuxi CHEN, Bingsong ZHENG, DaoLiang YAN(
)
Received:
2022-04-08
Accepted:
2022-06-06
Online:
2023-07-15
Published:
2023-08-25
Contact:
DaoLiang YAN
摘要:
为研究有机碳肥α-酮戊二酸(α-ketoglutaric acid,KG)对盐碱地植物生长调控及其碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)养分吸收利用的影响,以海滨锦葵(Kosteletzkya virginica)幼苗(具3~4片真叶)为试验材料,分别用0、5、15 g·L-1 NaCl溶液浇灌栽培基质,配以0、10、20 mg?L-1 α-酮戊二酸溶液叶面喷施,处理45 d后测定并分析各处理组盐胁迫下海滨锦葵生长及碳氮磷积累及其计量关系。结果表明,外源喷施α-酮戊二酸对盐胁迫下海滨锦葵植株的相对生长率没有明显影响,但促进了非盐胁迫下植株的总生物量;高盐(15 g?L-1 NaCl)胁迫下,外源喷施20 mg?L-1的KG明显提高了海滨锦葵的根生物量、根冠比和比叶重;同时,20 mg?L-1 KG显著提高了叶片C和N含量,对高盐胁迫下的海滨锦葵来说,α-酮戊二酸对叶片C的积累更为明显。α-酮戊二酸对海滨锦葵盐胁迫下的N、P积累没有明显影响;外施喷施20 mg?L-1 KG可以显著提高15 g?L-1 NaCl处理下海滨锦葵的碳氮比(C∶N)和碳磷比(C∶P)比值,N和P的利用效率显著提高;5 g·L-1 NaCl处理下,施加10 mg?L-1 KG显著增加了海滨锦葵叶片K+的含量,说明α-酮戊二酸可以促进盐胁迫下植株对K+的吸收,对Na+的吸收则无明显影响。相关分析表明,海滨锦葵叶片总N与叶片总P呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与叶片N/P呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),而与叶片K+/Na+呈极显著正相关(P<0.01)。叶片总P含量与叶片总Na含量呈极显著负相关,与叶片K+含量呈显著正相关。以上结果表明,一定水平的有机碳肥α-酮戊二酸能缓解盐胁迫对海滨锦葵生长的抑制,为盐碱地提高海滨锦葵的生物量和正常生长提供了新的施肥思路。
中图分类号:
吴雨露, 扈嘉鑫, 陈宇熙, 郑炳松, 闫道良. 外施α-酮戊二酸对盐胁迫下海滨锦葵生长、碳氮磷养分积累及其计量关系的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(7): 170-177.
Yulu WU, Jiaxin HU, Yuxi CHEN, Bingsong ZHENG, DaoLiang YAN. Effects of External Application of α-Ketoglutarate on Growth, Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Accumulation and Their Stoichiometric Relationships in Kosteletzkya virginica Under Salt Stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 170-177.
处理 Treatment | 试剂用量Reagent dosage | |
---|---|---|
KG/(mg∙L-1) | NaCl /(g∙L-1) | |
CK | 0 | 0 |
S5 | 0 | 5 |
S15 | 0 | 15 |
KG10 | 10 | 0 |
S5-KG10 | 10 | 5 |
S15-KG10 | 10 | 15 |
KG20 | 20 | 0 |
S5-KG20 | 20 | 5 |
S15-KG20 | 20 | 15 |
表1 试验组设置情况
Table 1 Setting of experimental group
处理 Treatment | 试剂用量Reagent dosage | |
---|---|---|
KG/(mg∙L-1) | NaCl /(g∙L-1) | |
CK | 0 | 0 |
S5 | 0 | 5 |
S15 | 0 | 15 |
KG10 | 10 | 0 |
S5-KG10 | 10 | 5 |
S15-KG10 | 10 | 15 |
KG20 | 20 | 0 |
S5-KG20 | 20 | 5 |
S15-KG20 | 20 | 15 |
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 相对生长率 Relative growth rate/% |
---|---|---|
CK | 22.0±4.5 a | 1.3±0.3 a |
KG10 | 22.8±3.8 a | 1.5±0.7 a |
KG20 | 25.9±5.1 a | 1.6±0.5 a |
S5 | 13.3±1.6 b | 0.7±0.5 b |
S5-KG10 | 14.8±2.1 b | 0.3±0.1 bc |
S5-KG20 | 15.3±2.0 b | 0.5±0.2 bc |
S15 | 11.1±2.2 b | 0.1±0.1 c |
S15-KG10 | 11.8±2.8 b | 0.1±0.1 c |
S15-KG20 | 10.9±1.7 b | 0.3±0.2 bc |
F值F value | 16.976 | 12.804 |
P值P value | 0.000 | 0.000 |
表2 不同α-酮戊二酸处理下的海滨锦葵株高
Table 2 Plant height of K. virginica treated with different concentration of α-ketoglutarate
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 相对生长率 Relative growth rate/% |
---|---|---|
CK | 22.0±4.5 a | 1.3±0.3 a |
KG10 | 22.8±3.8 a | 1.5±0.7 a |
KG20 | 25.9±5.1 a | 1.6±0.5 a |
S5 | 13.3±1.6 b | 0.7±0.5 b |
S5-KG10 | 14.8±2.1 b | 0.3±0.1 bc |
S5-KG20 | 15.3±2.0 b | 0.5±0.2 bc |
S15 | 11.1±2.2 b | 0.1±0.1 c |
S15-KG10 | 11.8±2.8 b | 0.1±0.1 c |
S15-KG20 | 10.9±1.7 b | 0.3±0.2 bc |
F值F value | 16.976 | 12.804 |
P值P value | 0.000 | 0.000 |
处理 Treatment | 生物量Biomas/mg | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio | 比叶重Specific leaf weight/(mg∙cm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
全株Whole plant | 根Root | 叶Leaf | |||
CK | 413.5±83.4 b | 190.5±10.8 a | 269.0±15.8 a | 0.41±0.05 d | 1.77±0.08 d |
KG10 | 619.1±34.5 a | 191.8±13.0 a | 263.2±42.0 a | 0.46±0.10 d | 1.91±0.19 d |
KG20 | 669.3±26.4 a | 193.7±21.3 a | 264.8±20.8 a | 0.45±0.06 d | 1.87±0.05 d |
S5 | 286.6±39.7 c | 154.6±25.5 ab | 112.5±12.5 c | 0.86±0.10 c | 2.69±0.15 bc |
S5-KG10 | 291.9±35.2 c | 142.4±7.7 b | 115.2±15.1 c | 0.68±0.11 c | 2.47±0.16 c |
S5-KG20 | 334.0±39.8 c | 146.8±19.8 b | 130.9±11.1 b | 1.07±0.10 b | 3.45±0.19 a |
S15 | 167.8±29.5 d | 98.8±16.3 c | 37.8±7.0 d | 1.48±0.13 a | 2.58±0.06 b |
S15-KG10 | 174.5±27.2 d | 103.2±14.7 c | 42.4±6.7 d | 1.45±0.10 a | 3.18±0.10 b |
S15-KG20 | 244.8±61.8 cd | 138.1±31.7 b | 54.0±13.6 d | 1.49±0.09 a | 3.80±0.08 a |
F值F value | 15.734 | 3.315 | 22.058 | 22.415 | 17.287 |
P值 P value | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
表3 盐胁迫条件下不同α-酮戊二酸处理的海滨锦葵单株生物量、根冠比和比叶重
Table 3 Biomass per plant, root shoot ratio and specific leaf weight of K. virginica treated with different concentration of α-ketoglutarate under salt stress
处理 Treatment | 生物量Biomas/mg | 根冠比 Root shoot ratio | 比叶重Specific leaf weight/(mg∙cm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
全株Whole plant | 根Root | 叶Leaf | |||
CK | 413.5±83.4 b | 190.5±10.8 a | 269.0±15.8 a | 0.41±0.05 d | 1.77±0.08 d |
KG10 | 619.1±34.5 a | 191.8±13.0 a | 263.2±42.0 a | 0.46±0.10 d | 1.91±0.19 d |
KG20 | 669.3±26.4 a | 193.7±21.3 a | 264.8±20.8 a | 0.45±0.06 d | 1.87±0.05 d |
S5 | 286.6±39.7 c | 154.6±25.5 ab | 112.5±12.5 c | 0.86±0.10 c | 2.69±0.15 bc |
S5-KG10 | 291.9±35.2 c | 142.4±7.7 b | 115.2±15.1 c | 0.68±0.11 c | 2.47±0.16 c |
S5-KG20 | 334.0±39.8 c | 146.8±19.8 b | 130.9±11.1 b | 1.07±0.10 b | 3.45±0.19 a |
S15 | 167.8±29.5 d | 98.8±16.3 c | 37.8±7.0 d | 1.48±0.13 a | 2.58±0.06 b |
S15-KG10 | 174.5±27.2 d | 103.2±14.7 c | 42.4±6.7 d | 1.45±0.10 a | 3.18±0.10 b |
S15-KG20 | 244.8±61.8 cd | 138.1±31.7 b | 54.0±13.6 d | 1.49±0.09 a | 3.80±0.08 a |
F值F value | 15.734 | 3.315 | 22.058 | 22.415 | 17.287 |
P值 P value | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
处理Treatment | 碳含量Carbon content/(g·kg-1) | 氮含量Nitrogen content/(g·kg-1) | 磷含量Phosphorus content/(g·kg-1) | 碳氮比 C/N | 碳磷比 C/P | 氮磷比 N/P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 336.57±4.31 b | 46.82±0.86 b | 3.95±0.03 a | 7.19±0.24 de | 85.21±3.78 e | 11.85±0.95 e |
KG10 | 339.40±6.09 b | 46.98±0.69 ab | 3.80±0.06 a | 7.23±0.23 ef | 89.32±1.81 e | 12.37±0.34 de |
KG20 | 360.57±6.78 a | 48.73±0.22 a | 3.90±0.09 a | 7.41±0.06 f | 92.45±2.42 e | 12.50±0.27 de |
S5 | 343.47±4.11 b | 38.76±0.64 d | 2.51±0.06 c | 8.87±0.24 c | 137.15±2.74 c | 15.48±0.47 c |
S5-KG10 | 358.23±3.16 ab | 41.85±0.50 c | 3.08±0.12 b | 8.56±0.16 cd | 116.31±4.30 d | 13.62±0.40 d |
S5-KG20 | 359.10±2.78 ab | 39.61±0.84 d | 2.50±0.08 c | 9.07±0.23 c | 143.64±5.75 c | 15.85±0.50 c |
S15 | 318.07±5.28 c | 29.83±0.68 e | 1.88±0.02 d | 10.68±0.43 b | 169.55±4.12 b | 15.89±0.27 c |
S15-KG10 | 320.27±4.81 c | 30.47±0.25 e | 1.60±0.05 e | 10.22±0.24 b | 200.17±6.47 a | 19.08±0.63 a |
S15-KG20 | 349.40±2.42 b | 29.03±0.52 e | 1.65±0.03 e | 12.74±0.28 a | 211.76±2.61 a | 17.58±0.59 b |
F值F value | 10.308 | 159.350 | 204.432 | 42.702 | 137.159 | 34.450 |
P值P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
表4 盐胁迫下不同α-酮戊二酸处理下的海滨锦葵叶片碳、氮、磷化学计量特征
Table 4 Stoichiometric characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in leaves of K. virginica plants treated with different concentration of α-ketoglutarate under salt stress
处理Treatment | 碳含量Carbon content/(g·kg-1) | 氮含量Nitrogen content/(g·kg-1) | 磷含量Phosphorus content/(g·kg-1) | 碳氮比 C/N | 碳磷比 C/P | 氮磷比 N/P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 336.57±4.31 b | 46.82±0.86 b | 3.95±0.03 a | 7.19±0.24 de | 85.21±3.78 e | 11.85±0.95 e |
KG10 | 339.40±6.09 b | 46.98±0.69 ab | 3.80±0.06 a | 7.23±0.23 ef | 89.32±1.81 e | 12.37±0.34 de |
KG20 | 360.57±6.78 a | 48.73±0.22 a | 3.90±0.09 a | 7.41±0.06 f | 92.45±2.42 e | 12.50±0.27 de |
S5 | 343.47±4.11 b | 38.76±0.64 d | 2.51±0.06 c | 8.87±0.24 c | 137.15±2.74 c | 15.48±0.47 c |
S5-KG10 | 358.23±3.16 ab | 41.85±0.50 c | 3.08±0.12 b | 8.56±0.16 cd | 116.31±4.30 d | 13.62±0.40 d |
S5-KG20 | 359.10±2.78 ab | 39.61±0.84 d | 2.50±0.08 c | 9.07±0.23 c | 143.64±5.75 c | 15.85±0.50 c |
S15 | 318.07±5.28 c | 29.83±0.68 e | 1.88±0.02 d | 10.68±0.43 b | 169.55±4.12 b | 15.89±0.27 c |
S15-KG10 | 320.27±4.81 c | 30.47±0.25 e | 1.60±0.05 e | 10.22±0.24 b | 200.17±6.47 a | 19.08±0.63 a |
S15-KG20 | 349.40±2.42 b | 29.03±0.52 e | 1.65±0.03 e | 12.74±0.28 a | 211.76±2.61 a | 17.58±0.59 b |
F值F value | 10.308 | 159.350 | 204.432 | 42.702 | 137.159 | 34.450 |
P值P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
处理Treatment | K+含量K+ content/(g∙kg-1) | Na+含量Na+ content/(g∙kg-1) | 钾钠比 K+/Na+ |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 36.71±0.89 bc | 1.25±0.09 e | 29.55±1.60 b |
KG10 | 45.76±1.12 a | 1.09±0.09 e | 42.50±3.01 a |
KG20 | 38.92±1.31 b | 1.00±0.04 e | 39.27±2.61 a |
S5 | 24.94±2.11 ef | 19.65±0.59 c | 1.28±0.14 c |
S5-KG10 | 34.69±0.57 c | 18.57±0.43 c | 1.87±0.02 c |
S5-KG20 | 30.08±1.11 d | 15.83±0.93 d | 1.92±0.18 c |
S15 | 24.54±0.57 ef | 33.85±0.52 b | 0.73±0.01 c |
S15-KG10 | 21.94±0.26 f | 34.23±1.60 b | 0.65±0.04 c |
S15-KG20 | 27.04±0.37 de | 46.27±0.89 a | 0.59±0.02 c |
F值F value | 54.660 | 486.083 | 163.070 |
P值P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
表5 盐胁迫下α-酮戊二酸处理下的海滨锦葵叶片Na+、K+含量及其化学计量特征
Table 5 Na+, K+ contents and their stoichiometric characteristics in leaves of K. virginica treated with different concentration of α-ketoglutarate under salt stress
处理Treatment | K+含量K+ content/(g∙kg-1) | Na+含量Na+ content/(g∙kg-1) | 钾钠比 K+/Na+ |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 36.71±0.89 bc | 1.25±0.09 e | 29.55±1.60 b |
KG10 | 45.76±1.12 a | 1.09±0.09 e | 42.50±3.01 a |
KG20 | 38.92±1.31 b | 1.00±0.04 e | 39.27±2.61 a |
S5 | 24.94±2.11 ef | 19.65±0.59 c | 1.28±0.14 c |
S5-KG10 | 34.69±0.57 c | 18.57±0.43 c | 1.87±0.02 c |
S5-KG20 | 30.08±1.11 d | 15.83±0.93 d | 1.92±0.18 c |
S15 | 24.54±0.57 ef | 33.85±0.52 b | 0.73±0.01 c |
S15-KG10 | 21.94±0.26 f | 34.23±1.60 b | 0.65±0.04 c |
S15-KG20 | 27.04±0.37 de | 46.27±0.89 a | 0.59±0.02 c |
F值F value | 54.660 | 486.083 | 163.070 |
P值P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
指标Index | 总氮Total N | 总磷Total P | 钾K+ | 钠Na+ | 氮磷比N/P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
总磷Total P | 0.970** | ||||
钾K+ | 0.840** | 0.887** | |||
钠Na+ | -0.967** | -0.946** | -0.805** | ||
氮磷比N/P | -0.867** | -0.946** | -0.847** | 0.852** | |
钾/钠K+/Na+ | 0.808** | 0.855** | 0.859** | -0.812** | -0.755** |
表 6 盐胁迫下不同α-酮戊二酸处理下的海滨锦葵叶N、P、Na+、K+化学计量特征相关性分析
Table 6 Correlation analysis of stoichiometric characteristics of N, P, Na+, K+ in leaves of K. virginica treated with different concentration of α-ketoglutarate under salt stress
指标Index | 总氮Total N | 总磷Total P | 钾K+ | 钠Na+ | 氮磷比N/P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
总磷Total P | 0.970** | ||||
钾K+ | 0.840** | 0.887** | |||
钠Na+ | -0.967** | -0.946** | -0.805** | ||
氮磷比N/P | -0.867** | -0.946** | -0.847** | 0.852** | |
钾/钠K+/Na+ | 0.808** | 0.855** | 0.859** | -0.812** | -0.755** |
1 | 杨青华. 生物化学调控原理与技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学出版社, 2000: 6-7. |
YANG Q H. Principle and Technology of Biochemical Regulation [M] Beijing: China Agricultural Science Press, 2000: 6-7. | |
2 | HODGES M. Enzyme redundancy and the important of 2-oxogl-utarate in plant ammonium assimilation [J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2002, 53(370): 905-916. |
3 | YUAN Y, OU J, WANG Z, et al.. Regulation of carbon and nitrogen metabolisms in rice roots by 2-oxoglutarate at the level of hexokinase [J]. Physiol. Plantarum, 2007, 129(2): 296-306. |
4 | 朱维琴, 吴良欢, 陶勤南. 氮营养对干旱逆境下水稻体内可溶性渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 29(5): 11-16. |
ZHU W Q, WU L H, TAO Q N. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on soluble osmotica in rice plants in response to drought stress [J]. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.), 2003, 29(5): 11-16. | |
5 | 黄楠, 郦千喜, 闫道良. 叶施α-酮戊二酸对铁皮石斛品质和养分含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(11): 2165-2168. |
HUANG N, LI Q X, YAN D L. Effect of spraying a-ketoglutarate on Dendrobium officinale quality and nutrient content [J]. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci., 2021, 62(11): 2165-2168. | |
6 | 吴婷婷, 陈佳宝, 袁虎威, 等. 叶面喷施有机碳对铁皮石斛碳水化合物代谢及Fe、Zn含量的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2021, 40(1): 31-36. |
WU T T, CHEN J B, YUAN H W, et al.. Effects of foliar spraying organic carbon on carbohydrate metabolism and Fe, Zn content of Dendrobium officinale [J]. Ecol. Sci., 2021, 40(1): 31-36. | |
7 | 闫道良, 郭予琦. NaCl处理对海滨锦葵N、P和Na+、K+含量及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(6): 1211-1217. |
YAN D L, GUO Y Q. Effects of NaCl exerted to Kosteletzkya pentacarpos on nitrogen, phosphorus nutritions, sodium and potassium lon contents and their stoichiometry characteristics [J]. Acta Agric. Nucl. Sin., 2015, 29(6): 1211-1217. | |
8 | 王红艳. 海滨锦葵耐盐生理特性及脯氨酸代谢相关基因的研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2016. |
WANG H Y. Study on physiological characteristics of salt tolerance and genes related to proline metabolism of Kosteletzkya virginica [D] Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences University, 2016. | |
9 | 汤晓丽. 海滨锦葵盐胁迫转录组分析和抗盐基因研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学, 2016. |
TANG X L. Analizing transcriptome profiles and studying salt-resistant genes of Kosteletzkya virginica under salt stress [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences University, 2016. | |
10 | 赵秀梅. 海滨锦葵的抗涝性及盐涝互作对其生长的影响[D]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2018. |
ZHAO X M. Waterlogging resistance and effects of salt-waterlogging interaction on the growth of Kosteletzkya virginica [D]. Jinan: Shandong Normal University, 2018. | |
11 | 闫道良, 连俊方, 任燕燕, 等. 盐胁迫下施氮对海滨锦葵营养生长期生长的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(6): 817-821. |
YAN D L, LIAN J F, REN Y Y, et al.. Growth of salt stressed Kosteletzkya virginica with addition of nitrogen [J]. J. Zhejiang A & F Univ.,2012, 29(6): 817-821. | |
12 | 吴航, 王顺霞, 卜海燕, 等. 青藏高原53种菊科植物种子中碳、氮、磷含量与种子大小和海拔的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(8): 1635-1641. |
WU H, WANG S X, BU H Y, et al.. Effect of seed size and altitude on the C, N, P contents of 53 Compositae plant seeds on the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet plateau [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2014, 34(8): 1635-1641. | |
13 | 方金豹,庞荣丽,郭琳琳,等. 植物中氮、磷、钾的测定: [S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011. |
FANG J B, PANG R L, GUO L L, et al.. Determination of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in plants: [S]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2011. | |
14 | BAYLIAK M M, HRYNKIV O V, KNYHYNYTSKA R V, et al.. Alpha-ketoglutarate enhances freeze-thaw tolerance and prevents carbonhydrate-induced cell death of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J]. Arch. Microbiol., 2018, 200(1): 33-46. |
15 | FERRARIO-MÉRY S, MASCLAUX C, SUZUKI A, et al.. Glutamine and a-ketoglutarate are metabolite signals involved in nitrate reductase gene transcription in untransformed and transformed tobacco plants deficient in ferredoxin-glutamine-a-ketoglutarate aminotransferase [J]. Planta, 2001, 15(2): 356-360. |
16 | OLIVEIRA I C, CORUZZI G M. Carbon and amino acids reciprocally modulate the expression of glutamine synthetase in Arabidopsis [J]. Plant Physiol., 1999, 121(121): 301-310. |
17 | 李会. 施氮对干旱胁迫下冬小麦氮代谢的影响及α-酮戊二酸的调控作用研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2016. |
LI H. Effects of nitrogen application on nitrogen metabolism in winter wheat under drought stress condition and the regulation metabolism of α-ketoglutarate [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2016. | |
18 | 李莹, 王志强, 马超, 等. 外源α-酮戊二酸对干旱胁迫下小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2012, 32(2): 249-253. |
LI Y, WANG Z Q, MA C, et al.. Effects of exogenous α-ketoglutarate on grain filling and yield formation of wheat under drought stress [J]. J. Triticeae Crops, 2012, 32(2): 249-253. | |
19 | 孙倩. 外源α-酮戊二酸对低水氮胁迫下小麦氮代谢及产量性状的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2014. |
SUN Q. Effects of exogenous α-ketoglutarate on nitrogenmetabolism and yield traits of wheat under low water potential and low nitrogen stress [D]. Zhengzhou:Henan Agricultural University, 2014. | |
20 | 郑亚萍, 陈殿绪, 信彩云, 等. 施磷水平对花生叶源生理特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2014, 28(4): 727-731. |
ZHENG Y P, CHEN D X, XIN C Y, et al.. Effects of phosphorus application rate on physiology parameters of leaf source in peanut [J]. Acta Agric. Nucl. Sin., 2014, 28(4): 727-731. | |
21 | SOUSA A E C, LACERDA C F D, GHEYI H R, et al.. Leaf nutrient content and physiological responses of physic nut submited to salt stress and phosphorus [J]. Rev. Caatinga, 2012, 25(2): 144-152. |
22 | 魏玉强. α-酮戊二酸对松浦镜鲤氮代谢, 抗氧化能力和小肠粘膜形态与功能的影响[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2015. |
WEI Y Q. Effects of α-ketoglutarate supplementation on nitrogen metabolism, antioxidant capacity and intestinal mucosal morphology and function of songpu mirror carp (Cyprinus Carpio) [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2015. | |
23 | 梁健. α-酮戊二酸对草鱼氨氮胁迫的缓解作用研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2014. |
LIANG J. Studies of α-ketoglutarate on alleviating ammonia nitrogen stress of Ctenopharyngodon Idellus [D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2014. | |
24 | 邹国元, 刘宝存, 王美菊, 等. 施肥对蕹菜生长及品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2002, 17(2): 97-101. |
ZOU G Y, LIU B C, WANG M J, et al.. Effects of phosphorus application rate on physiology parameters of leaf source in peanut [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2002, 17(2): 97-101. | |
25 | 廖宗文, 毛小云, 刘可星. 重视有机营养研究与有机碳肥创新——关于植物营养经典理论的现代思考[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1694-1698. |
LIAO Z W, MAO X Y, LIU K X. More attention to organic nutrition research and innovation of organic carbon fertilizers—a modern thinking about classic plant nutrient theory [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2017, 23(6): 1694-1698. |
[1] | 麻仲花, 陈娟, 吴娜, 满本菊, 王晓港, 者永清, 刘吉利. 盐胁迫与供磷水平对柳枝稷苗期光合特性与总生物量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 190-200. |
[2] | 李峰, 殷丛培, 殷冉, 王凡, 韩永亮, 杨志敏, 刘建成. 燕麦根际土壤细菌多样性对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(1): 153-165. |
[3] | 郝艳玲, 闫伟. 混合盐胁迫对白榆幼苗形态及生理指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(7): 69-76. |
[4] | 田翁由, 刘昊, 甘超林, 伍柳芬, 李爱, 杨丽芳, 高英. 盐胁迫下樱桃砧木的光合响应和光谱特性[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 77-83. |
[5] | 张胜珍, 马艳芝. 氯化钙对盐胁迫下荆芥种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响 [J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 65-71. |
[6] | 李星, 胡杨, 马媛, 贾守义, 李钢铁. 细穗柽柳对3种单盐胁迫的生理响应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(5): 52-60. |
[7] | 顾惠敏1,陈波浪1*,孙锦2. 菌根化育苗对盐胁迫下加工番茄生长和生理特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 166-177. |
[8] | 王志恒,黄思麒,邹芳,杨秀柳,魏玉清*. 温度与NaCl处理对甜高粱种子萌发及幼苗抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 42-51. |
[9] | 尹勇刚,袁军伟,刘长江,韩斌,李敏敏,孙艳,贾楠,郭紫娟,赵胜建*. NaCl胁迫对葡萄砧木光合特性与叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(8): 49-55. |
[10] | 杨颖1,王月林2,闫晶秋子1,李钢铁1*. 盐胁迫对刺榆种子萌发及幼苗生理特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 53-60. |
[11] | 胡博,闫伟*,刘宇,郝艳玲. 三种桑生理特性对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 61-67. |
[12] | 张秀妍1,2,徐妙云2,郑红艳2,邹俊杰2,张笑宇1*,王磊2*. 盐胁迫下水稻体内miRNA表达谱分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(12): 10-19. |
[13] | 闫晶秋子1,李钢铁1*,王月林2,麻云霞1,杨颖1. 盐胁迫对蒙桑种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(1): 28-37. |
[14] | 田梅§,曹慧雅§,张明烁§,张子璇,杨冬月,李浩然,马春英*. 红花在萌发期和幼苗期对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(5): 49-54. |
[15] | 张冠初1,2,张智猛1*,慈敦伟1,丁红1,杨吉顺1,史晓龙1,3,田家明1,3,戴良香1*. 不同品种花生耐盐性及Na+吸收动力学特性[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(2): 34-40. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||