中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 205-217.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0890
• 生物制造 资源生态 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2023-12-04
接受日期:
2024-02-04
出版日期:
2025-06-15
发布日期:
2025-06-23
通讯作者:
陈佰鸿
作者简介:
黄娟娟 E-mail:2645265817@qq.com;
基金资助:
Juanjuan HUANG(), Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN(
)
Received:
2023-12-04
Accepted:
2024-02-04
Online:
2025-06-15
Published:
2025-06-23
Contact:
Baihong CHEN
摘要:
为探究不同叶面肥对‘黑比诺’葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响,以5年生‘黑比诺’葡萄为试材,分别喷施无机营养型(T1)、氨基酸型(T2)、激素型(T3)、大量元素水溶型(T4)、腐殖酸型(T5)、抗性诱导型(T6)叶面肥,以喷施清水为对照(CK),分析不同时期葡萄植株叶面积、新梢基部粗度、叶片SPAD值、矿质元素含量变化,并对成熟期果实的品质进行测定。结果表明,T5处理的叶面积显著增大,在花后15、30、45、60、75 d分别较CK增加14.10%、12.34%、15.47%、15.27%、15.70%。叶面肥处理均增加了葡萄植株的新梢基部粗度,其中T5处理效果最佳。与CK相比,各处理不同时期的叶片SPAD值均有所提高,但差异不显著。对矿质元素含量测定结果表明,T1处理叶片中的大量元素含量显著提高,其中K含量的增幅最大;T6处理对中量元素的提升效果最佳;T5处理对微量元素的积累效果较好,且在花后60和75 d时叶片中的Cu含量显著增加。在果实品质方面,T5处理葡萄果实中的花青素、类黄酮、单宁、总酚含量分别较CK显著提高16.88%、38.38%、24.74%、43.13%。对采收期葡萄的果实品质相关指标进行主成分分析表明,T5处理的得分最高。综上,6种不同类型叶面肥对‘黑比诺’葡萄植株的生长与果实品质均起促进作用,其中腐殖酸型叶面肥效果最优,能显著改善果实品质。以上研究结果为葡萄提质增产提供理论指导。
中图分类号:
黄娟娟, 张志强, 毛娟, 马宗桓, 陈佰鸿. 不同叶面肥对‘黑比诺’葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 205-217.
Juanjuan HUANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN. Effects of Different Foliar Fertilizers on Growth, Development and Fruit Quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ Grape[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 205-217.
图1 不同叶面肥下葡萄的叶面积注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 1 Leaf area of grape under different foliar fertilizersNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图2 不同叶面肥下葡萄的新梢基部粗度注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 2 Base thickness of grape shoot under different foliar fertilizersNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图3 不同叶面肥下葡萄叶片的SPAD值注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 3 SPAD value of grape leaves under different foliar fertilizersNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
元素 Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | ||
磷P | CK | 3.82±0.10 ab | 4.30±0.13 ab | 4.24±0.04 a | 4.04±0.34 ab | 3.67±0.14 c |
T1 | 4.17±0.07 a | 4.51±0.05 a | 4.28±0.13 a | 3.55±0.10 b | 4.16±0.05 ab | |
T2 | 3.89±0.15 ab | 4.25±0.11 ab | 3.87±0.09 b | 4.12±0.04 a | 4.15±0.02 ab | |
T3 | 3.52±0.23 b | 4.11±0.01 ab | 3.79±0.14 b | 3.63±0.05 ab | 3.92±0.03 b | |
T4 | 4.27±0.14 a | 4.47±0.07 a | 3.89±0.04 b | 3.83±0.02 ab | 4.10±0.07 ab | |
T5 | 3.93±0.10 ab | 4.49±0.13 a | 4.29±0.05 a | 3.52±0.06 b | 4.33±0.07 a | |
T6 | 3.93±0.17 ab | 4.05±0.18 b | 4.23±0.06 a | 3.83±0.12 ab | 3.68±0.06 c | |
钾K | CK | 8.69±0.63 c | 11.11±0.39 a | 8.54±0.20 c | 10.38±0.20 a | 6.67±0.41 a |
T1 | 10.20±0.14 a | 10.56±0.15 a | 10.43±0.79 b | 11.57±0.39 a | 6.94±0.29 a | |
T2 | 8.37±0.22 bc | 12.57±0.12 a | 10.09±0.16 b | 10.44±0.14 a | 7.22±0.14 a | |
T3 | 7.69±0.31 bc | 10.46±0.38 a | 8.68±0.22 c | 6.95±0.52 b | 6.31±0.46 a | |
T4 | 9.61±0.30 bc | 11.59±0.28 a | 9.83±0.20 b | 7.26±0.17 b | 7.12±0.86 a | |
T5 | 9.39±0.38 b | 10.95±0.50 a | 10.46±0.34 b | 11.20±0.78 a | 6.52±0.25 a | |
T6 | 9.98±0.48 a | 13.43±0.16 a | 12.15±0.51 a | 6.97±0.30 b | 6.41±0.39 a |
表1 不同叶面肥下葡萄叶片的大量元素含量续表Continued (g?kg-1)
Table 1 Content of major elements in grape leaves under different leaf fertilizers
元素 Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | ||
磷P | CK | 3.82±0.10 ab | 4.30±0.13 ab | 4.24±0.04 a | 4.04±0.34 ab | 3.67±0.14 c |
T1 | 4.17±0.07 a | 4.51±0.05 a | 4.28±0.13 a | 3.55±0.10 b | 4.16±0.05 ab | |
T2 | 3.89±0.15 ab | 4.25±0.11 ab | 3.87±0.09 b | 4.12±0.04 a | 4.15±0.02 ab | |
T3 | 3.52±0.23 b | 4.11±0.01 ab | 3.79±0.14 b | 3.63±0.05 ab | 3.92±0.03 b | |
T4 | 4.27±0.14 a | 4.47±0.07 a | 3.89±0.04 b | 3.83±0.02 ab | 4.10±0.07 ab | |
T5 | 3.93±0.10 ab | 4.49±0.13 a | 4.29±0.05 a | 3.52±0.06 b | 4.33±0.07 a | |
T6 | 3.93±0.17 ab | 4.05±0.18 b | 4.23±0.06 a | 3.83±0.12 ab | 3.68±0.06 c | |
钾K | CK | 8.69±0.63 c | 11.11±0.39 a | 8.54±0.20 c | 10.38±0.20 a | 6.67±0.41 a |
T1 | 10.20±0.14 a | 10.56±0.15 a | 10.43±0.79 b | 11.57±0.39 a | 6.94±0.29 a | |
T2 | 8.37±0.22 bc | 12.57±0.12 a | 10.09±0.16 b | 10.44±0.14 a | 7.22±0.14 a | |
T3 | 7.69±0.31 bc | 10.46±0.38 a | 8.68±0.22 c | 6.95±0.52 b | 6.31±0.46 a | |
T4 | 9.61±0.30 bc | 11.59±0.28 a | 9.83±0.20 b | 7.26±0.17 b | 7.12±0.86 a | |
T5 | 9.39±0.38 b | 10.95±0.50 a | 10.46±0.34 b | 11.20±0.78 a | 6.52±0.25 a | |
T6 | 9.98±0.48 a | 13.43±0.16 a | 12.15±0.51 a | 6.97±0.30 b | 6.41±0.39 a |
元素 Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | ||
钙Ca | CK | 1.10±0.14 c | 2.47±0.18 a | 2.52±0.03 a | 2.52±0.06 a | 1.58±0.02 c |
T1 | 2.32±0.06 a | 2.44±0.07 a | 2.36±0.08 a | 2.27±0.05 b | 1.96±0.06 ab | |
T2 | 1.39±0.17 bc | 2.49±0.07 a | 2.52±0.01 a | 2.56±0.04 a | 1.91±0.02 b | |
T3 | 1.44±0.07 bc | 2.47±0.03 a | 1.64±0.14 b | 1.42±0.07 d | 1.99±0.05 ab | |
T4 | 1.35±0.08 bc | 2.34±0.10 a | 2.51±0.02 a | 1.60±0.02 c | 2.06±0.02 a | |
T5 | 1.55±0.22 b | 2.41±0.18 a | 2.40±0.08 a | 1.63±0.03 c | 2.06±0.05 a | |
T6 | 2.17±0.10 a | 2.38±0.04 a | 2.17±0.02 a | 1.49±0.05 cd | 2.01±0.03 ab | |
镁Mg | CK | 4.39±0.10 ab | 4.46±0.10 c | 5.01±0.30 c | 5.22±0.10 c | 6.24±0.09 c |
T1 | 4.45±0.31 ab | 4.96±0.31 b | 5.21±0.04 bc | 5.35±0.02 bc | 6.23±0.12 bc | |
T2 | 4.41±0.22 ab | 4.81±0.22 bc | 5.05±0.08 c | 5.68±0.26 b | 6.80±0.10 a | |
T3 | 4.95±0.02 a | 5.24±0.02 ab | 5.47±0.14 b | 6.26±0.10 a | 6.51±0.05 b | |
T4 | 4.60±0.14 ab | 4.93±0.14 b | 5.24±0.08 bc | 6.32±0.11 a | 6.77±0.07 a | |
T5 | 4.34±0.12 ab | 5.64±0.12 a | 6.02±0.01 a | 6.18±0.08 a | 6.21±0.20 bc | |
T6 | 4.22±0.06 b | 5.55±0.06 a | 5.42±0.02 b | 6.31±0.13 a | 6.67±0.01 a |
表2 不同叶面肥下葡萄叶片的中量元素含量 (g?kg-1)
Table 2 Content of trace elements in grape leaves under different foliar fertilizers
元素 Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | ||
钙Ca | CK | 1.10±0.14 c | 2.47±0.18 a | 2.52±0.03 a | 2.52±0.06 a | 1.58±0.02 c |
T1 | 2.32±0.06 a | 2.44±0.07 a | 2.36±0.08 a | 2.27±0.05 b | 1.96±0.06 ab | |
T2 | 1.39±0.17 bc | 2.49±0.07 a | 2.52±0.01 a | 2.56±0.04 a | 1.91±0.02 b | |
T3 | 1.44±0.07 bc | 2.47±0.03 a | 1.64±0.14 b | 1.42±0.07 d | 1.99±0.05 ab | |
T4 | 1.35±0.08 bc | 2.34±0.10 a | 2.51±0.02 a | 1.60±0.02 c | 2.06±0.02 a | |
T5 | 1.55±0.22 b | 2.41±0.18 a | 2.40±0.08 a | 1.63±0.03 c | 2.06±0.05 a | |
T6 | 2.17±0.10 a | 2.38±0.04 a | 2.17±0.02 a | 1.49±0.05 cd | 2.01±0.03 ab | |
镁Mg | CK | 4.39±0.10 ab | 4.46±0.10 c | 5.01±0.30 c | 5.22±0.10 c | 6.24±0.09 c |
T1 | 4.45±0.31 ab | 4.96±0.31 b | 5.21±0.04 bc | 5.35±0.02 bc | 6.23±0.12 bc | |
T2 | 4.41±0.22 ab | 4.81±0.22 bc | 5.05±0.08 c | 5.68±0.26 b | 6.80±0.10 a | |
T3 | 4.95±0.02 a | 5.24±0.02 ab | 5.47±0.14 b | 6.26±0.10 a | 6.51±0.05 b | |
T4 | 4.60±0.14 ab | 4.93±0.14 b | 5.24±0.08 bc | 6.32±0.11 a | 6.77±0.07 a | |
T5 | 4.34±0.12 ab | 5.64±0.12 a | 6.02±0.01 a | 6.18±0.08 a | 6.21±0.20 bc | |
T6 | 4.22±0.06 b | 5.55±0.06 a | 5.42±0.02 b | 6.31±0.13 a | 6.67±0.01 a |
元素Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ||
铜Cu | CK | 8.35±0.67 a | 3.84±0.61 ab | 5.27±0.30 b | 0.75±0.07 d | 11.87±0.30 d |
T1 | 8.45±0.40 a | 4.88±0.59 a | 6.67±0.57 ab | 4.03±0.23 c | 16.07±2.33 c | |
T2 | 5.92±0.29 b | 2.43±0.08 b | 3.61±0.47 c | 0.40±0.05 d | 20.44±0.40 b | |
T3 | 7.02±0.14 ab | 3.03±0.04 b | 7.66±0.55 a | 13.10±0.77 b | 23.31±0.46 ab | |
T4 | 6.28±0.30 b | 3.42±0.39 ab | 6.37±0.59 ab | 15.11±0.30 a | 23.42±0.95 ab | |
T5 | 5.83±0.35 b | 3.02±0.49 b | 5.51±0.36 b | 12.55±0.89 b | 24.63±0.67 a | |
T6 | 3.93±0.63 c | 2.96±0.32 b | 1.60±0.08 d | 13.05±0.12 b | 22.34±0.17 ab | |
铁Fe | CK | 43.53±2.06 ab | 53.60±1.79 d | 47.34±0.63 a | 26.46±2.54 b | 96.27±2.47 b |
T1 | 43.99±0.50 ab | 62.79±1.00 bc | 55.53±2.14 a | 31.65±5.79 b | 118.41±1.53 a | |
T2 | 41.77±2.48 ab | 57.58±3.50 cd | 16.29±1.86 b | 29.65±1.88 b | 95.89±4.93 b | |
T3 | 36.74±1.25 b | 73.80±1.20 a | 20.25±2.05 b | 84.76±4.99 a | 94.25±3.35 b | |
T4 | 43.06±4.61 ab | 58.89±2.79 cd | 22.89±3.68 b | 96.77±5.10 a | 78.35±3.70 b | |
T5 | 48.84±2.81 a | 68.30±2.54 ab | 17.22±0.90 b | 99.62±11.54 a | 63.52±2.01 c | |
T6 | 43.13±2.82 ab | 63.56±2.71 bc | 21.33±5.01 b | 89.91±3.31 a | 100.77±3.26 b | |
锰Mn | CK | 77.62±3.97 c | 65.91±2.36 b | 70.08±3.00 ab | 75.64±1.69 a | 86.53±4.30 a |
T1 | 85.34±0.86 bc | 109.48±3.23 a | 73.42±2.86 a | 46.40±2.86 c | 75.46±1.72 bc | |
T2 | 55.00±2.96 cd | 67.28±7.47 b | 40.58±2.35 d | 66.61±0.40 b | 71.83±1.44 cd | |
T3 | 76.94±2.15 c | 71.36±5.95 b | 62.24±5.16 bc | 32.26±1.20 e | 66.39±0.04 d | |
T4 | 110.52±0.45 a | 98.20±2.00 a | 76.51±2.85 a | 71.99±0.95 a | 82.55±3.46 ab | |
T5 | 92.19±4.11 b | 96.93±1.60 a | 72.68±1.96 a | 77.06±0.80 a | 81.00±3.10 ab | |
T6 | 47.22±2.85 d | 62.07±2.12 b | 51.77±3.31 c | 41.21±1.06 d | 80.03±1.52 abc | |
锌Zn | CK | 84.41±1.49 c | 143.47±4.98 a | 102.22±5.05 ab | 109.95±1.32 b | 88.47±4.38 a |
T1 | 125.45±2.02 b | 137.25±4.79 ab | 88.22±1.25 bc | 133.94±3.98 a | 73.51±2.40 bc | |
T2 | 118.42±4.15 b | 118.96±10.18 abc | 91.16±2.70 abc | 115.79±0.73 b | 74.43±3.53 b | |
T3 | 129.03±4.96 b | 108.91±1.28 c | 87.39±5.11 bc | 84.48±3.10 d | 64.16±1.87 cd | |
T4 | 149.61±4.17 a | 126.09±12.57 abc | 105.50±1.33 a | 96.55±4.61 c | 66.49±2.71 bcd | |
T5 | 144.05±1.26 a | 129.42±3.88 abc | 91.17±1.72 abc | 89.27±4.44 cd | 64.55±3.45 bcd | |
T6 | 87.91±1.17 c | 115.02±3.52 bc | 82.05±8.10 c | 58.15±2.30 e | 57.23±1.03 d |
表3 不同叶面肥下葡萄叶片的微量元素含量 (mg?kg-1)
Table 3 Micronutrient content of grape leaves under different foliar fertilizers
元素Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ||
铜Cu | CK | 8.35±0.67 a | 3.84±0.61 ab | 5.27±0.30 b | 0.75±0.07 d | 11.87±0.30 d |
T1 | 8.45±0.40 a | 4.88±0.59 a | 6.67±0.57 ab | 4.03±0.23 c | 16.07±2.33 c | |
T2 | 5.92±0.29 b | 2.43±0.08 b | 3.61±0.47 c | 0.40±0.05 d | 20.44±0.40 b | |
T3 | 7.02±0.14 ab | 3.03±0.04 b | 7.66±0.55 a | 13.10±0.77 b | 23.31±0.46 ab | |
T4 | 6.28±0.30 b | 3.42±0.39 ab | 6.37±0.59 ab | 15.11±0.30 a | 23.42±0.95 ab | |
T5 | 5.83±0.35 b | 3.02±0.49 b | 5.51±0.36 b | 12.55±0.89 b | 24.63±0.67 a | |
T6 | 3.93±0.63 c | 2.96±0.32 b | 1.60±0.08 d | 13.05±0.12 b | 22.34±0.17 ab | |
铁Fe | CK | 43.53±2.06 ab | 53.60±1.79 d | 47.34±0.63 a | 26.46±2.54 b | 96.27±2.47 b |
T1 | 43.99±0.50 ab | 62.79±1.00 bc | 55.53±2.14 a | 31.65±5.79 b | 118.41±1.53 a | |
T2 | 41.77±2.48 ab | 57.58±3.50 cd | 16.29±1.86 b | 29.65±1.88 b | 95.89±4.93 b | |
T3 | 36.74±1.25 b | 73.80±1.20 a | 20.25±2.05 b | 84.76±4.99 a | 94.25±3.35 b | |
T4 | 43.06±4.61 ab | 58.89±2.79 cd | 22.89±3.68 b | 96.77±5.10 a | 78.35±3.70 b | |
T5 | 48.84±2.81 a | 68.30±2.54 ab | 17.22±0.90 b | 99.62±11.54 a | 63.52±2.01 c | |
T6 | 43.13±2.82 ab | 63.56±2.71 bc | 21.33±5.01 b | 89.91±3.31 a | 100.77±3.26 b | |
锰Mn | CK | 77.62±3.97 c | 65.91±2.36 b | 70.08±3.00 ab | 75.64±1.69 a | 86.53±4.30 a |
T1 | 85.34±0.86 bc | 109.48±3.23 a | 73.42±2.86 a | 46.40±2.86 c | 75.46±1.72 bc | |
T2 | 55.00±2.96 cd | 67.28±7.47 b | 40.58±2.35 d | 66.61±0.40 b | 71.83±1.44 cd | |
T3 | 76.94±2.15 c | 71.36±5.95 b | 62.24±5.16 bc | 32.26±1.20 e | 66.39±0.04 d | |
T4 | 110.52±0.45 a | 98.20±2.00 a | 76.51±2.85 a | 71.99±0.95 a | 82.55±3.46 ab | |
T5 | 92.19±4.11 b | 96.93±1.60 a | 72.68±1.96 a | 77.06±0.80 a | 81.00±3.10 ab | |
T6 | 47.22±2.85 d | 62.07±2.12 b | 51.77±3.31 c | 41.21±1.06 d | 80.03±1.52 abc | |
锌Zn | CK | 84.41±1.49 c | 143.47±4.98 a | 102.22±5.05 ab | 109.95±1.32 b | 88.47±4.38 a |
T1 | 125.45±2.02 b | 137.25±4.79 ab | 88.22±1.25 bc | 133.94±3.98 a | 73.51±2.40 bc | |
T2 | 118.42±4.15 b | 118.96±10.18 abc | 91.16±2.70 abc | 115.79±0.73 b | 74.43±3.53 b | |
T3 | 129.03±4.96 b | 108.91±1.28 c | 87.39±5.11 bc | 84.48±3.10 d | 64.16±1.87 cd | |
T4 | 149.61±4.17 a | 126.09±12.57 abc | 105.50±1.33 a | 96.55±4.61 c | 66.49±2.71 bcd | |
T5 | 144.05±1.26 a | 129.42±3.88 abc | 91.17±1.72 abc | 89.27±4.44 cd | 64.55±3.45 bcd | |
T6 | 87.91±1.17 c | 115.02±3.52 bc | 82.05±8.10 c | 58.15±2.30 e | 57.23±1.03 d |
图4 不同叶面肥下葡萄果实的单穗重和单粒重注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 4 Weights of clusters and single berry of grape under different foliar fertilizersNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图5 不同叶面肥下葡萄果实的可溶性固形物和可溶性蛋白含量注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 5 Soluble solids and soluble protein contents in grape under different foliar fertilizersNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图6 不同叶面肥下葡萄果实的糖酸比注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 6 Sugar to acid ratio of grape under different foliar fertilizersNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图7 不同叶面肥下葡萄果皮的总花青素和类黄酮含量注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 7 Effects of different foliar fertilizers on the content of total anthocyanins and flavonoids in grape peelNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图8 不同叶面肥对葡萄果实单宁和总酚含量的影响注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 8 Effects of different foliar fertilizers on the content of tannin and total phenols in grape fruitsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图9 叶片营养指标与果实品质指标相关性分析注:*表示在P<0.05水平相关显著。
Fig. 9 Correlation analysis between leaf nutrition index and fruit quality indexNote:* indicates significant correlation at P<0.05 level.
指标Index | 第1主成分PC1 | 第2主成分PC2 | 第3主成分PC3 |
---|---|---|---|
穗重 Weight per single cluster | 0.549 | -0.810 | -0.101 |
粒重 Weight per single berry | 0.938 | -0.270 | 0.136 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.745 | 0.529 | -0.203 |
可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugars | 0.632 | 0.748 | -0.131 |
总酸 Total acids | -0.936 | 0.193 | 0.190 |
糖酸比 Sugar to acid ratio | 0.916 | 0.254 | -0.199 |
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | 0.102 | 0.205 | 0.966 |
类黄酮 Flavonoids | 0.968 | 0.070 | 0.172 |
总花青素 Total anthocyanins | 0.950 | -0.088 | 0.009 |
单宁 Tannin | 0.916 | -0.055 | 0.124 |
总酚 Total phenols | 0.916 | -0.191 | 0.146 |
特征值Eigen value | 7.379 | 1.765 | 1.163 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 67.083 | 16.044 | 10.575 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 67.083 | 83.127 | 93.701 |
表4 葡萄果实品质指标主成分分析
Table 4 Principal component analysis of grape quality index
指标Index | 第1主成分PC1 | 第2主成分PC2 | 第3主成分PC3 |
---|---|---|---|
穗重 Weight per single cluster | 0.549 | -0.810 | -0.101 |
粒重 Weight per single berry | 0.938 | -0.270 | 0.136 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.745 | 0.529 | -0.203 |
可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugars | 0.632 | 0.748 | -0.131 |
总酸 Total acids | -0.936 | 0.193 | 0.190 |
糖酸比 Sugar to acid ratio | 0.916 | 0.254 | -0.199 |
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | 0.102 | 0.205 | 0.966 |
类黄酮 Flavonoids | 0.968 | 0.070 | 0.172 |
总花青素 Total anthocyanins | 0.950 | -0.088 | 0.009 |
单宁 Tannin | 0.916 | -0.055 | 0.124 |
总酚 Total phenols | 0.916 | -0.191 | 0.146 |
特征值Eigen value | 7.379 | 1.765 | 1.163 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 67.083 | 16.044 | 10.575 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 67.083 | 83.127 | 93.701 |
处理 Treatment | F1 | F2 | F3 | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -1.459 88 | 0.523 71 | -0.035 61 | -0.899 07 | 7 |
T1 | -0.709 93 | 0.773 46 | -0.701 22 | -0.426 30 | 5 |
T2 | -0.192 16 | 0.533 64 | 1.587 63 | 0.124 60 | 3 |
T3 | -0.471 88 | -2.116 23 | 0.315 24 | -0.622 74 | 6 |
T4 | 0.433 94 | -0.209 75 | -1.652 61 | 0.082 68 | 4 |
T5 | 1.336 04 | -0.066 81 | 0.380 34 | 0.925 75 | 1 |
T6 | 1.063 88 | 0.561 98 | 0.106 20 | 0.815 08 | 2 |
表5 不同处理主成分综合评价排名
Table 5 Comprehensive evaluation ranking of different treatments
处理 Treatment | F1 | F2 | F3 | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -1.459 88 | 0.523 71 | -0.035 61 | -0.899 07 | 7 |
T1 | -0.709 93 | 0.773 46 | -0.701 22 | -0.426 30 | 5 |
T2 | -0.192 16 | 0.533 64 | 1.587 63 | 0.124 60 | 3 |
T3 | -0.471 88 | -2.116 23 | 0.315 24 | -0.622 74 | 6 |
T4 | 0.433 94 | -0.209 75 | -1.652 61 | 0.082 68 | 4 |
T5 | 1.336 04 | -0.066 81 | 0.380 34 | 0.925 75 | 1 |
T6 | 1.063 88 | 0.561 98 | 0.106 20 | 0.815 08 | 2 |
1 | RUSTIONI L, ALTOMARE A, SHANSHIASHVILI G,et al.. Microclimate of grape bunch and sunburn of white grape berries: effect on wine quality [J]. Foods, 2023,12(3):621-632. |
2 | 张晓煜,李红英,陈卫平,等.中国北方干白酒用葡萄生态区划[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(11):3107-3111. |
ZHANG X Y, LI H Y, CHEN W P,et al.. Ecological regionalization of dry white wine grapes in Northern China [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2014,33(11):3107-3111. | |
3 | 杨博,张波,王学庆,等.酚类物质添加对‘黑比诺’干红葡萄酒发酵阶段主要香气成分的影响[J].西北农业学报,2021,30(10):1514-1525. |
YANG B, ZHANG B, WANG X Q,et al.. Effect of phenolics addition on main aroma components of ‘Pinot Noir’ dry red wine during fermentation [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021,30(10):1514-1525. | |
4 | 朱臻,杨相东,徐章倩,等.农作物叶片对大气沉降重金属的吸收转运和积累机制[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(2):332-345. |
ZHU Z, YANG X D, XU Z Q, et al.. Foliar uptake,translocation and accumulation of heavy metals from atmospheric deposition in crops [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2021,27(2):332-345. | |
5 | 孙得芳,王娜,庞世花,等.叶面肥发展现状与展望[J].山东化工,2017,46(7):89-90. |
SUN D F, WANG N, PANG S H, et al.. The foliar fertilizer development status and prospect [J]. Shandong Chem. Ind., 2017,46(7):89-90. | |
6 | NIU J H, LIU C, HUANG M L,et al.. Effects of foliar fertilization:a review of current status and future perspectives [J]. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 2021,21(1):104-118. |
7 | 何键,聂兆广,李玲玉,等.螯合肥料在农业上的应用效果研究[J].土壤通报,2017,48(2):507-512. |
HE J, NIE Z G, LI L Y, et al.. The application effects of chelate fertilizers in agriculture [J].Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2017,48(2):507-512. | |
8 | 王鑫.叶施不同配比氮、钾对‘长富2号’苹果叶片生理特性及果实品质的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021. |
WANG X. Effects of different ratios of nitrogen and potassium on leaf physiological characteristics and fruit quality of ‘Chang Fu 2’ apple [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021. | |
9 | 祁雅馨. 四种叶面肥对‘夏黑’葡萄光合特性及果实品质的影响[D].成都:四川农业大学,2022. |
QI Y X. Effects of four foliar fertilizers on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of ‘Summer black’ grape [D]. Chenngdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022. | |
10 | 吴茂东.施氮时期对‘黑比诺’葡萄矿质元素含量及果实品质的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2020. |
WU M D. Effect of nitrogen application period on mineral elements content and fruit quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ grape [D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2020. | |
11 | 温云杰,李桂花,黄金莉,等.连续流动分析仪与自动凯氏定氮仪测定小麦秸秆全氮含量之比较[J].中国土壤与肥料,2015(6):146-151. |
WEN Y J, LI G H, HUANG J L, et al.. Determination nitrogen in the Kjeldahl digests of plant samples by continuous flow analyzer in comparison with auto-mated distillation-titration instrument [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2015(6):146-151. | |
12 | 李萍,李明明,王浩,等.改良钼锑抗比色法测定不同谷子材料组织磷含量[J].激光生物学报,2020,29(3):237-244. |
LI P, LI M M, WANG H, et al.. Determination of phosphorus content in different millet tissues by modified molybdenum-antimony anti-colorimetric method [J].Acta Laser Biol. Sin., 2020, 29(3):237-244. | |
13 | 林应兴.菌草栽培平菇子实体的营养成分分析[J].江西农业学报,2023,35(1):172-176. |
LIN Y X. Analysis of nutritional components in fruiting body of oyster mushrooms cultivated with Juncao [J].Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2023,35(1):172-176. | |
14 | 代红军,魏强,贺琰,等.油菜素内酯对高温胁迫下葡萄花色苷合成及果实品质的影响[J].园艺学报,2023,50(8):1711-1722. |
DAI H J, WEI Q, HE Y, et al.. Effects of brassinolide treatment on anthocyanin synthesis and quality in grape under high temperature stress [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2023,50(8):1711-1722. | |
15 | 国家卫生健康委员会,国家市场监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中总酸的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021. |
16 | 梁玲,黄玉琼,陈小红.不同色彩珙桐叶片和苞片解剖结构及色素含量比较研究[J].西北植物学报,2020,40(9):1539-1548. |
LIANG L, HUANG Y Q, CHEN X H. Anatomical structure and pigment content of Davidia involucrata leaves and bracts with different colors [J].Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2020,40(9):1539-1548. | |
17 | 马宗桓,李玉梅,李彦彪,等.‘赤霞珠’葡萄在河西走廊产区不同产地的品质分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(3):80-87. |
MA Z H, LI Y M, LI Y B, et al.. Quality analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes fromdifferent producing areas in Hexi Corridor [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2023, 41(3):80-87. | |
18 | 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:182-185. |
19 | 冷寒冰,万宁海,刘群录.香樟冠层光环境对叶片功能性状和光合特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(8):2113-2122. |
LENG H B, WAN N H, LIU Q L. Effects of light environments within Cinnamomum camphora canopy on leaf functional traits and photosyn-thetic characteristics [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2023,34(8):2113-2122. | |
20 | 杨明昊,张艺灿,王孝娣,等.葡萄枝条堆肥对设施栽培葡萄园土壤和87-1葡萄生长发育的影响[J].中国果树,2023(4):78-81, 86. |
21 | 杜海萌,韦还和,余清源,等.水稻叶面肥研究的应用进展与展望[J].作物杂志,2022(3):33-38. |
DU H M, WEI H H, YU Q Y, et al.. Application progress and prospect of rice foliar fertilizer [J]. Crops, 2022(3):33-38. | |
22 | 刘喆, GEORGEANDREW C B,岑伊静,等.叶面肥对柑橘全爪螨生长发育和繁殖及柑橘苗生长的影响[J].昆虫学报,2021,64(9):1104-1111. |
LIU Z, GEORGEANDREW C B, CENG Y J, et al.. Effects of four foliar fertilizers on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of ‘Summer Black’ grape [J]. Acta Entomol. Sin., 2021, 64(9):1104-1111. | |
23 | 潘越,史彦江,陈淑英,等.喷施叶面肥对平欧杂种榛‘新榛1号’嫩枝扦插的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2016,38(5):920-926. |
PAN Y, SHI Y J, CHEN S Y, et al.. Effect of foliar fertilizers on the hybrid hazel ‘New hazel one’ twig cutting [J]. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis, 2016,38(5):920-926. | |
24 | TEJADA M, GONZALEZ J L. Influence of foliar fertilization with amino acids and humic acids on productivity and quality of Asparagus [J]. Biol. Agric. Hortic., 2003, 21(3):277-291. |
25 | 任盼盼,马小沙,韦帮稳,等.稀土叶面肥对荔枝光合作用和成花坐果的影响[J].果树学报,2021,38(9):1540-1549. |
REN P P, MA X S, WEI B W, et al.. Effects of foliar rare earth fertilizer on photosynthesis,flowering and fruiting in Litchi chinensis [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2021,38(9):1540-1549. | |
26 | 张树衡,丁德东,何静,等.两种生物肥料配施对再植花椒生长及光合特性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2021,30(9):1355-1364. |
ZHANG S H, DING D D, HE J, et al.. Effect of two biofertilizer mixtures on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of replanted Zanthoxylum bungeanum [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021,30(9):1355-1364. | |
27 | 李玉静,冯雨晴,赵园园,等.不同形态氮素吸收利用及其对植物生理代谢影响的综述[J].中国农业科技导报,2023,25(2):128-139. |
LI Y J, FENG Y Q, ZHAO Y Y, et al.. Review of absorption and utilization of different nitrogen forms and their effects on plant physiological metabolism [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023,25(2):128-139. | |
28 | 宋奇娉,封鹏雯,刘洋,等.PSⅡ组装与修复循环机制研究进展[J].植物生理学报,2019,55(2):133-140. |
SONG Q P, FENG P W, LIU Y, et al.. The research progress of the mechanism on PSⅡ assemble and repair circulation [J].Plant Physiol. J., 2019, 55(2):133-140. | |
29 | 张玉秀,张凯,李金梅,等.镍在植物体中的吸收转运机制[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(3):778-782. |
ZHANG Y X, ZHANG K, LI J M,et al.. Absorption and transportation mechanism of nickel in plants [J]. Chin. J. Ecol. Agric., 2008,16(3):778-782. | |
30 | 卢柏山,董会,赵久然,等.不同鲜食玉米品种适采期氨基酸含量分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2023,25(11):132-142. |
LU B S, DONG H, ZHAO J R, et al.. Amino acid content analysis of different fresh corn varieties at suitable harvest time [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023,25(11):132-142. | |
31 | 杨旭,林清,黄丽,等.留树保鲜对恭城水柿果实品质、贮藏特性及翌年果实产量和品质的影响[J].果树学报,2023,40(11):2435-2445. |
YANG X, LIN Q, HUANG L, et al.. Effects of plant regulators and leaf fertilization on fruit quality, storage ability of persimmon on- tree storage and yield and quality of the fruits next season [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2023, 40(11):2435-2445. | |
32 | 韩艳婷,杨国顺,石雪晖,等.不同镁营养水平对红地球葡萄叶绿体结构及光合响应的影响[J].果树学报,2011,28(4):603-609. |
HAN Y T, YANG G S, SHI X H,et al.. Effects of different magnesium concentrations on chloroplast ultrastructure and photosynthetic response of Vitis vinifera cv.Red Globe [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2011, 28(4):603-609. | |
33 | 杜玉霞,李晶,寸待泽,等.低镁胁迫对不同柠檬品种植株矿质养分含量以及果实产量、品质的影响[J].果树学报,2021,38(8):1330-1339. |
DU Y X, LI J, CUN D Z, et al.. Effects of low magnesium stress on plant growth, photosynthetic characteristics and magnesium content of different lemon varieties [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2021, 38(8):1330-1339. | |
34 | 唐明佳,徐进,林锐,等.番茄响应光温逆境的生理分子机制研究进展[J].园艺学报,2022,49(10):2174-2188. |
TANG M J, XU J, LIN R, et al.. Advances in physiological and molecular mechanism of tomato responses to light and temperature stress [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2022, 49(10):2174-2188. | |
35 | 何孝英.腐植酸叶面肥对柠檬主要次生代谢产物的影响[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2018. |
HE X Y. Effects of humic acid foliar fertilizers on the main secondary metabolites of citrus lemon [D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2018. | |
36 | 王慧亮.浙江栽培蓝莓品种果实品质分析及滤光膜和叶面肥对其影响[D].金华:浙江师范大学,2010. |
WANG H L. Blueberry fruit quality analysis of Zhejiang cultivated varieties andeffect of filter membrane and foliar spray organic fertilizer [D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University, 2010. | |
37 | GAALICHE B, LADHARI A, ZARRELLI A,et al..Impact of foliar potassium fertilization on biochemical composition and antioxidant activity of fig (Ficus carica L.) [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2019,253:111-119. |
[1] | 王如月, 虎海防, 罗莎莎, 甄紫怡, 徐业勇, 胡晓静. 杏李不同采收成熟度果实品质分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 158-169. |
[2] | 曾宝珍, 成永娟, 杨娟博, 车莉莉, 梁靖, 卢世雄, 梁国平, 马宗桓, 毛娟. 甘肃民勤地区‘慕合怀特’葡萄最佳采收期的确定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 70-79. |
[3] | 白世践, 户金鸽, 李超, 蔡军社. 3种架式对‘新郁’葡萄栽培性状及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 63-73. |
[4] | 马力, 曹婷婷, 范又维, 任志雨, 刘春, 袁素霞. 不同生根试剂对微型盆栽月季扦插生根的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 50-60. |
[5] | 彭守华, 许铭铭, 尉继强, 梁丽君, 叶全, 迟晓元, 张少峰, 董向丽. 生物菌肥FBR1不同施用方式对花生生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 200-205. |
[6] | 卢登洋, 童盼盼, 闫敏, 鲍荆凯, 刘鸣哲, 夏怡蕾, 吴翠云. 库尔勒香梨大果芽变的鉴定与评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 52-64. |
[7] | 张海军, 张娟, 贾毅男, 王江龙, 冯丽. 不同架式对‘南太湖特早’葡萄果实香气成分及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 201-213. |
[8] | 杨圣艳, 曹漫, 郭宝石, 杨超, 侯智霞. 不同铁环境对蓝莓生长及叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 52-62. |
[9] | 杜彩艳, 鲁海燕, 熊艳竹, 孙曦, 孙秀梅, 普继雄, 张乃明. 连续两年沼液与化肥配施对桃生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 165-175. |
[10] | 白世践, 户金鸽, 吴久赟, 张雯, 谢辉, 赵荣华, 陈光, 蔡军社. 不同砧木对吐鲁番地区‘克瑞森无核’葡萄生长特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 76-87. |
[11] | 朱士江, 李虎, 徐文, 冯雅婷. 三峡库区土壤含水量对柑橘园果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 201-207. |
[12] | 田露, 郭晓霞, 苏文斌, 黄春燕, 李智, 张鹏, 菅彩媛, 刘佳, 孔德娟, 韩康. 微生物肥料对连作甜菜生长发育及产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(5): 192-203. |
[13] | 金鑫, 张璐, 吴鹏, 李萍, 谭伟, 桂明英. 遮光处理对盆景灵芝生长发育和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 147-156. |
[14] | 李玉静, 冯雨晴, 赵园园, 史宏志. 不同形态氮素吸收利用及其对植物生理代谢影响的综述[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(2): 128-139. |
[15] | 贾毅男, 万仲武, 许昌, 张光弟, 王江龙, 张昆明, 侯小健, 包文毅, 王玉, 陈卫军. 露地栽培‘大青葡萄’架面不同位置果实品质指标分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(12): 44-57. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||