复硝酚钠和枯草芽孢杆菌复配对烟苗生长和生理指标的影响

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0128

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 154-161.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0128

复硝酚钠和枯草芽孢杆菌复配对烟苗生长和生理指标的影响

彭田伟¹(), 谢会雅², 李思军³, 刘怡轩², 帅开峰¹^,⁴, 彭媛媛¹, 王青¹, 李迪秦¹()

^1.湖南农业大学农学院，长沙 410128
^2.湖南省烟草公司株洲市公司，湖南株洲 412000
^3.湖南省烟草公司郴州市公司，湖南郴州 423000
^4.湖南省烟草公司常德市公司，湖南常德 415000

收稿日期:2021-02-03 接受日期:2021-04-14 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-19
通讯作者: 李迪秦
作者简介:彭田伟 E-mail： 1394111457@qq.com；
基金资助:
湖南省烟草公司株洲市公司项目(株烟运〔2020〕2号);湖南省烟草公司郴州市公司项目(郴烟运〔2019〕45号);中国烟草总公司广西中烟工业有限责任公司项目(201745000034001);湖南省烟草公司常德市公司项目(2019430700840183)

Effects of Sodium Dinitrate with Bacillus Sbutilis Complex on Growth and Physiological Indexes of Tobacco Seedlings

Tianwei PENG¹(), Huiya XIE², Sijun LI³, Yixuan LIU², Kaifeng SHUAI¹^,⁴, Yuanyuan PENG¹, Qing WANG¹, Diqin LI¹()

^1.College of Agronomy，Hunan Agricultural University，Changsha 410128，China
^2.Zhuzhou Branch of Hunan Tobacco Company，Hunan Zhuzhou 412000，China
^3.Chenzhou Branch of Hunan Tobacco Company，Hunan Chenzhou 423000，China
^4.Changde Branch of Hunan Tobacco Company，Hunan Changde 415000，China

Received:2021-02-03 Accepted:2021-04-14 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-19
Contact: Diqin LI

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨不同浓度的植物生长调节剂和微生物菌剂复配施用对烟苗素质的影响，以烤烟新品系20619为材料，采用漂浮育苗，在烟苗4叶1心期喷施不同浓度的复硝酚钠和枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂复配剂，对8叶1心（成苗期）烟苗主要生长和生理指标进行测定与分析。结果表明，复硝酚钠和枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂复配喷施后，8叶1心烟苗的干物质积累、根系活力、叶片叶绿素含量及硝酸还原酶活性，均好于对照；且以喷施20 mg的1.8%复硝酚钠和7.5 g的枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂处理，烟苗全株干重（4.98 g·株^-1）、干鲜比、根系活力（93.01 μg·g^-1·h^-1）、叶片叶绿素含量（0.548 5 mg·g^-1）及硝酸还原酶（1.434 U·g^-1）活性均表现最高；叶片中的过氧化氢酶、超氧化物岐化酶和过氧化物酶活性以及丙二醛含量均表现为最高。表明对4叶1心烟苗喷施复硝酚钠和枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂复配剂，有利于提高烟苗素质和培育壮苗。

关键词: 烤烟, 生长指标, 生理指标, 复硝酚钠, 枯草芽孢杆菌

Abstract:

In order to study the effects of different concentrations combination of plant growth regulators and microorganism agents on quality of tobacco seedlings， new flue-cured tobacco strain 20619 with floating seedlings as the experimental material， different concentrations mixture of sodium nitrophenolate & Bacillus subtilis agent was sprayed on 4 leaves 1 heart of tobacco seedlings， and determined and analyzed main growth and physiological indexes of tobacco seedlings with 8 leaves & 1 heart. The result showed that in 8 leaves 1 heart of tobacco seedlings after sprayed compound of sodium nitrophenolate & Bacillus subtilis agent， its dry matter accumulation content， root activity， chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase activity were better than that of the control， and dry weight （4.98 g·plant^-1）， ratio of dry to fresh weight， roots activity （93.01 μg·g^-1·h^-1）， chlorophyll content （0.548 5 mg·g^-1） & nitrate reductase （1.434 U·g^-1） of tobacco seedlings were the highest of the treatment of spraied compounding agents of sodium nitrophenolate 20 mg & Bacillus subtilis agent 7.5 g， and activities of catalase， superoxide dismutase， peroxidase and malondialdehyde in leaves were the highest. It showed that spraying the mixture of sodium nitrophenolate & Bacillus subtilis agent on tobacco seedlings is beneficial to improve the quality of tobacco seedlings and cultivating strong seedlings.

Key words: flue-cured tobacco, growth index, physiological index, sodium nitrophenolate, Bacillus subtilis

中图分类号:

S572

彭田伟, 谢会雅, 李思军, 刘怡轩, 帅开峰, 彭媛媛, 王青, 李迪秦. 复硝酚钠和枯草芽孢杆菌复配对烟苗生长和生理指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 154-161.

Tianwei PENG, Huiya XIE, Sijun LI, Yixuan LIU, Kaifeng SHUAI, Yuanyuan PENG, Qing WANG, Diqin LI. Effects of Sodium Dinitrate with Bacillus Sbutilis Complex on Growth and Physiological Indexes of Tobacco Seedlings[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 154-161.

图/表 8

参考文献 31

1	周钰淇,王生才,刘本坤,等.壮苗早发技术对烤烟农艺性状与经济性状的影响[J].作物研究,2014,28(2):177-179.
	ZHOU Y Q, WANG S C, LIU B K, et al.. Effect of strong seedling proleptics on agricultural characters and yieldof tobacco [J]. Crop Res. 2014,28(2):177-179.
2	王林闯,赵建锋,罗德旭,等.不同多效唑浸种时间对黄瓜苗期生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2017,45(23): 136-138.
3	吴杰,冉茂,宗学凤,等.烤烟浅水育苗与漂浮育苗技术的比较研究[J].西南农业学报,2011,24(6):2443-2445.
	WU J, RAN M, ZONG X F, et al.. Comparative studies on tobacco seedling nursing in shallow water and floating system [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2011,24(6):2443-2445.
4	朱振国.六种植物生长调节剂对烟草幼苗生长发育的影响[D]. 山东泰安:山东农业大学, 2019.
	ZHU Z G. Effects of six plant growth regulators on growth and development of tobacco seedlings [D]. Shandong Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019.
5	李红,陈鑫,许艺,等.益生菌EG-2#不同浓度处理对辣椒苗期生长发育的影响研究[J]. 四川农业科技,2020,12(8): 2443-2445.
	LI H, CHEN X, XU Y,et al.. Effects of probiotics EG-2# with different concentrations on growth and development of pepper seedlings[J]. Sichuan Agric. Sci. Technol.,2020,12(8) : 2443-2445.
6	赵环宇,孙光伟,王玉军,等. 植物生长调节剂对烤烟上部叶质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2019,40(2) : 38-43.
	ZHAO H Y, SUN G W, WANG Y J,et al.. Effects of plant growth regulators on the quality of upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chin. Tob. Sci.,2019,40(2) : 38-43.
7	赵环宇. 植物生长调节剂对烤烟上部叶生长发育及质量的影响研究[D]. 山东泰安:山东农业大学,2019.
	ZHAO H Y. Effects of plant growth regulators on growth, development and quality of upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco[D]. Shandong Taian: Shandong Agricultural University,2019.
8	李波,魏科宇,王丽华. 不同种类及浓度的植物生长调节剂对具鳞水柏枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2021,41(1): 33-38.
	LI B, WEI K Y, WANG L H.Effects of different plant growth regulators and their concentrations on rooting of myricaria squamosa cuttings[J]. J. Southwest Forestry Univ (Natural scinece),2021,41(1): 33-38.
9	屈旭,焦禹顺,王仁汉,等.赤霉素和复硝酚钠对辣椒种子萌发及幼苗活力的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜,2019,32(11) : 59-63.
	QU X, JIAO Y S, WANG R H,et al.. Effects of gibberellin and sodium nitrophenolate on seed germination and seedling vigor of pepper [J]. China Cucurbits Veget., 2019,32(11): 59-63.
10	韩琳. 复硝酚钠对设施茄子幼苗生长的影响[J]. 北京农业,2015(15) : 117.
	HAN L.Effects of sodium nitrophenolate on the growth of eggplant seedlings in greenhouse [J].Beijing Agric.,2015(15): 117.
11	胡兆平,李伟,陈建秋,等. 复硝酚钠、DA-6和α-萘乙酸钠对茄子产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2013,29(25): 168-172.
	HU Z P, LI W, CHEN J Q,et al.. Effect of sodium nitrophenolate, DA-6 and NAA on the eggplant yield and quality [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2013, 29(25): 168-172.
12	卜令铎,李江舟,张立猛,等. 5种外源活性物质促进烤烟增产提质的机制研究[J]. 西南农业学报,2018,31(5): 941-947.
	BU L D, LI J Z, ZHANG L M,et al.. Mechanism of tobacco yield and quality promotion with 5 exogenous active substances [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 31(5): 941-947.
13	夏雪岩,程汝宏,陈媛,等.植物生长调节剂和叶面肥对谷子杂交种的防早衰效应分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2014,16(1) : 104-110.
	XIA X Y, CHENG R H, CHEN Y,et al.. Effect of plant growth regulator and foliar fertilizer on preventing premature aging of foxtail millet hybrid [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol.,2014,16(1): 104-110.
14	蒋南,龚湛武,陈力力,等.施用枯草芽孢杆菌的土壤养分含量与三大微生物间灰色关联分析[J].作物杂志,2019(3) : 142-149.
	JIANG N, GONG Z W, CHEN L L,et al.. Grey correlation analysis between soil nutrients and three microorganisms after application of bacillus subtilis [J]. Crops,2019(3): 142-149.
15	杨超才,朱列书,李迪秦,等. 不同枯草芽孢杆菌用量对植烟土壤养分含量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(4): 779-785.
	YANG C C, ZHU L S, LI D Q,et al.. Effect of different amount of bacillus subtilis on nutrients of tobacco planting soils [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci.,2018,31(4): 779-785.
16	SHASMITA, SWAIN H, NAIK S K, et al.. Comparative analysis of different biotic and abiotic agents for growth promotion in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their effect on induction of resistance against Rhizoctonia solani :a soil borne pathogen [J]. Biol. Control,2019,133:123-133.
17	杜公福,李晓亮,戚志强,等. 硫酸亚铁协同枯草芽孢杆菌对辣椒疫病抑制作用研究[J]. 植物保护,2020,46(5) : 142-149.
	DU G F, LI X L, QI Z Q,et al.. Inhibitory mechanism of ferrous sulfate combined with Bacillus subtilis on phytophtora capsici[J]. Plant Protect, 2020,46(5): 142-149.
18	黄亚丽,郑立伟,黄媛媛,等. 枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂不同施用方式对甜瓜土壤微生物多样性及生长的影响[J]. 生物工程学报,2020,36(12): 2644-2656.
	HUANG Y L, ZHENG L W, HUANG Y Y, et al.. Effects of different application methods of Bacillus subtilis agent on soil microbial diversity and growth of muskmelon [J]. Chin. J. Biotechnol., 2020,36(12): 2644-2656.
19	易有金,肖浪涛,王若仲,等. 内生枯草芽孢杆菌B-001对烟草幼苗的促生作用及其生长动态[J]. 植物保护学报,2007(6): 619-623.
	YI Y J, XIAO L T, WANG R Z, et al.. Growth effect of endophyte B-001 ( Bacillus subtilis) on tobacco seedling and its fluctuation[J]. Acta Phytophyl. Sin.,2007(6): 619-623.
20	汤小朋, 陈磊,熊康宁.有效微生物菌群在贵州喀斯特地区农业生产中的应用前景展望[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2020,22(4): 129-138.
	TANG X P, CHEN L, XIONG K N. Application prospect of EM bacteria in agricultural production of Guizhou Karst region[J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020,22(4): 129-138.
21	萧浪涛,王三根. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005:1-262.
22	舒展,张晓素,陈娟,等.叶绿素含量测定的简化[J]. 植物生理学通讯,2010,46(4):399-402.
	SHU Z, ZHANG X S, CHEN J,et al.. The simplification of chlorophyll content measurement[J].Plant Physiol. Commun.,2010,46(4):399-402.
23	韩锦峰. 烟草栽培生理[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2003:1-286.
24	杨艳敏,贾海丽,潘一展. 复硝酚钠与GA₃复配对美国红栌组培苗生长的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017,48(9):1653-1658.
	YANG Y M, JIA H L, PAN Y Z. Effects of combination sodium nitraphenolate+GA₃ on cotinus coggygria tissue culture plants [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2017,48(9):1653-1658.
25	徐加利,尹红增,周海燕,等. 复硝酚钠和胺鲜酯·复硝酚钠对大棚番茄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 植物医生,2019,32(1):23-26.
	XU J L, YIN H Z, ZHOU H Y,et al.. The effects of 1.8% compound sodium nitrophenolate water aqua and 3% amine hexanpate.compound sodium nitrophenolate water aqua on the growth and quality of greenhouse-grown tomato[J]. Plant Doctor,2019,32(1):23-26.
26	李进华,李浩,林茂,等.复硝酚钠与萘乙酸处理对红花羊蹄甲扦插效果的影响[J].广西林业科学,2016,45(2):204-207.
	LI J H, LI H, LIN M,et al.. Effects of compound sodium nitrophenolate and 1-Naphthylacetic acid on cutting efficiency of bauhinia blakeana [J]. Guangxi Forestry Sci.,2016,45(2):204-207.
27	崔向超,胡君利,林先贵,等. 丛枝菌根真菌与复硝酚钠在番茄育苗中的应用[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(5) : 843-846.
	CUI X C, HU J L, LIN X G,et al.. Application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and compound sodium nitrophenolate in tomato seedling growth [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol.,2012,18(5): 843-846.
28	冯长春,高峻,许立峰,等.外源生长素对烤烟幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学,2020,41(2) : 27-31.
	FENG C C, GAO J, XU L F, et al.. Effects of exogenous auxin on growth and development of flue-cured tobacco seedlings [J]. Chin. Tobacco Sci.,2020,41(2): 27-31.
29	李红利,王俊玲,薛占军,等. 复硝酚钠对韭菜生长及硝酸盐还原同化效应研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2014,34(4) : 740-745.
	LI H L, WANG J L, XUE Z J,et al.. Effects of compound sodium nitrophenolate on growth and nitrate reduction and assimilation in the leaves of Chinese Chive [J].Acta Bot. Boreal-Occident.Sin., 2014,34(4): 740-745.
30	丁伟,李如意,孔祥男. 水稻三种化控剂复配及壮秧机理研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2020,51(8) : 9-16.
	DING W, LI R Y, KONG X N. Study on the mixture of three chemical regulators and the mechanism of strong seedling in rice [J]. J. Northeast Agric.Univ.,2020,51(8): 9-16.
31	姚丹,牛舒琪,赵祺,等. 梭梭根际枯草芽孢杆菌WM13-24对多年生黑麦草耐盐性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(20) : 7419-7429.
	YAO D, NIU S Q, ZHAO Q,et al.. Induced salt tolerance of ryegrass by Bacillus subtilis strain WM13-24 from the rhizosphere of Haloxylon ammodendron[J]. Acta Ecol. Sin.,2020,40(20): 7419-7429.

处理 Treatments	复硝酚钠 Sodium dinitrophenol		枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂 Bacillus subtilis agent
处理 Treatments	施用量 Applied content/mg	含量 Content/%	施用量 Applied content/g	含量 Content/%
T1	20.0	0.398	7.5	0.148
T2	20.0	0.398	0.0	0.000
T3	15.0	0.299	7.5	0.148
T4	15.0	0.299	0.0	0.000
T5	10.0	0.199	7.5	0.148
T6	10.0	0.199	0.0	0.000
CK	0.0	0.000	0.0	0.000

处理 Treatments	复硝酚钠 Sodium dinitrophenol		枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂 Bacillus subtilis agent
处理 Treatments	施用量 Applied content/mg	含量 Content/%	施用量 Applied content/g	含量 Content/%
T1	20.0	0.398	7.5	0.148
T2	20.0	0.398	0.0	0.000
T3	15.0	0.299	7.5	0.148
T4	15.0	0.299	0.0	0.000
T5	10.0	0.199	7.5	0.148
T6	10.0	0.199	0.0	0.000
CK	0.0	0.000	0.0	0.000

处理 Treatment	根系活力 Roots vigor/（µg·g^-1·h^-1）
T1	93.01±0.24 a
T2	72.07±0.92 d
T3	84.99±1.78 b
T4	71.66±0.43 d
T5	78.56±0.66 c
T6	68.37±0.39 e
CK	63.87±9.64 f

处理 Treatment	根系活力 Roots vigor/（µg·g^-1·h^-1）
T1	93.01±0.24 a
T2	72.07±0.92 d
T3	84.99±1.78 b
T4	71.66±0.43 d
T5	78.56±0.66 c
T6	68.37±0.39 e
CK	63.87±9.64 f

处理 Treatment	叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content/ （mg·g^-1）	叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content/ （mg·g^-1）	叶绿素（a+b）含量 Chlorophyll （a+b） content/ （mg·g^-1）
T1	0.368 0±0.002 9 a	0.180 5±0.003 9 a	0.548 4±0.003 4 a
T2	0.312 8±0.002 6 c	0.126 7±0.001 4 c	0.439 5±0.004 0 c
T3	0.348 6±0.003 9 b	0.146 1±0.001 7 b	0.494 7±0.005 1 b
T4	0.297 6±0.000 9 d	0.116 6±0.002 6 d	0.414 2±0.003 5 d
T5	0.333 3±0.005 1 c	0.125 1±0.002 9 c	0.458 4±0.005 4 c
T6	0.271 6±0.001 7 e	0.089 1±0.002 2 e	0.360 7±0.002 9 e
CK	0.222 7±0.023 1 f	0.073 7±0.001 0 f	0.296 4±0.022 7 f

复硝酚钠和枯草芽孢杆菌复配对烟苗生长和生理指标的影响

Effects of Sodium Dinitrate with Bacillus Sbutilis Complex on Growth and Physiological Indexes of Tobacco Seedlings

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

处理 Treatment	超氧化物岐化酶SOD/（U·g^-1）	过氧化物酶 POD/（U·g^-1）	过氧化氢酶 CAT/（U·mg^-1）	硝酸还原酶 NR/（U·g^-1）	丙二醛 MDA/（U·mg^-1）
T1	88.92±1.39 a	109.5±31.1 a	44.36±0.42 a	1.434±0.304 a	16.94±0.07 a
T2	74.37±0.36 c	60.3±16.3 b	14.89±0.20 d	0.591±0.019 c	12.90±0.02 d
T3	87.84±0.72 a	89.8±14.7 ab	39.88±0.30 b	0.917±0.003 b	14.47±0.08 b
T4	66.81±1.15 d	68.9±8.0 b	14.51±0.15 d	0.520±0.008 c	12.04±0.04 e
T5	85.12±1.92 b	86.0±17.6 ab	34.52±0.27 c	0.812±0.006 b	13.78±0.10 c
T6	63.68±1.54 e	64.8±10.8 b	13.68±0.20 d	0.501±0.005 c	11.06±0.02 f
CK	59.02±1.05 f	58.4±4.8 b	9.95±0.09 f	0.451±0.003 c	8.97±0.04 g

指标 Index	过氧化物酶 POD	超氧化物岐化酶 SOD	过氧化氢酶 CAT	硝酸还原酶 NR	丙二醛 MDA
叶干重 Leaf dry weight	0.634^**	0.957^**	0.885^**	0.854^**	0.950^**
茎干重 Stem dry weight	0.635^**	0.920^**	0.938^**	0.866^**	0.928^**
根干重 Root dry weight	0.646^**	0.973^**	0.923^**	0.866^**	0.962^**
全株鲜干比 Radio of plant fresh to dry weight	-0.639^**	-0.916^**	-0.892^**	-0.846^**	-0.938^**

[1]	王玉, 李春光, 刘欢, 张月华, 冯晓民, 李耀光, 李怀奇, 景延秋, 孙觅. 烤烟叶片叶绿体超微结构与质体色素降解产物的关系初探[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 67-76.
[2]	罗俊, 周宏, 钱发聪, 李军营. 遮阴对烤烟烟碱合成调控的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 115-123.
[3]	梁艳琼, 李锐, 吴伟怀, 习金根, 谭施北, 黄兴, 陆英, 贺春萍, 易克贤. 枯草芽孢杆菌Czk1挥发物混合活性组分对橡胶灵芝菌的抑菌机理[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 152-159.
[4]	柳渊博, 王静, 朱学杰, 蒋伟峰, 刘天, 张锦中, 李耀鑫, 符云鹏. 不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 193-201.
[5]	范宁波1,周俊学2,江凯2,王宏2,史龙飞2,高玉龙3,陈颐3. 不同成熟期烤烟主脉中膜脂过氧化及其与衰老相关基因的关系探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 66-72.
[6]	保志娟,金蓉,杨金清,张琦,朱永立,赵正雄*. Pb、Zn复合作用对烤烟抗氧化酶及碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 65-72.
[7]	王东1,曹源倍2,吉遥芳3,傅渝亮3*. 不同滴灌量对红寺堡区酿酒葡萄生长和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(1): 154-161.
[8]	杨瑞萍1,刘瑞香1,马迎梅1*,郭占斌2,张宏武2,白宇1,赵新宇1. 不同藜麦资源的抗旱性评价及渗透调节剂对其抗旱性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 52-60.
[9]	张嘉雯，卢绍浩，赵喆，赵铭钦*. 外源褪黑素对低温胁迫下烟草幼苗生理指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 78-86.
[10]	张琛,韩婷,马洁,杨涓,刘根红,郑国琦* . 起垄高度对黑果枸杞生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 153-161.
[11]	杨成翠1,徐照丽2,史普酉1,贾孟1,白羽祥1,朱宣全1,程亚东1,杨焕文1,王戈*. 氮肥运筹对烤烟养分积累和产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(6): 176-185.
[12]	胡博,闫伟*,刘宇,郝艳玲. 三种桑生理特性对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 61-67.
[13]	刘勇1,李立新1,吴金富2,赵树德2,何宽信1*. 多雨烟区倚靠式散叶装烟烘烤工艺对烟叶质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 162-170.
[14]	刘扣珠1,高真真1,夏素素1,李建华2,顿松阳2,李洪亮2,王京2,段卫东3,史宏志1*. 基于产值和感官指标的豫中“上六片”烟叶栽培措施优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(2): 158-165.
[15]	杨明坤1,李建华2,刘扣珠1,顿松阳2,李洪亮2,王典2,史宏志1*. 豫中上六片烤烟不同采收期对烤后烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(12): 163-171.