中国农业科技导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 195-205.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0914
• 生物制造 资源生态 • 上一篇
韩秀丽1(), 李嘉伟1, 张杰1, 郭艳杰1,2, 张丽娟1, 吉艳芝1(
)
收稿日期:
2022-10-26
接受日期:
2022-12-15
出版日期:
2024-04-15
发布日期:
2024-04-23
通讯作者:
吉艳芝
作者简介:
韩秀丽 E-mail:Hanxl202210@163.com;
基金资助:
Xiuli HAN1(), Jiawei LI1, Jie ZHANG1, Yanjie GUO1,2, Lijuan ZHANG1, Yanzhi JI1(
)
Received:
2022-10-26
Accepted:
2022-12-15
Online:
2024-04-15
Published:
2024-04-23
Contact:
Yanzhi JI
摘要:
为了明确生物有机肥替代化肥对‘赤霞珠’葡萄产量、品质与土壤肥力的影响,于2019—2020年设置传统水肥(CK)、优化水肥(Opt)及优化水肥中化肥氮的20%(B1)和40%(B2)分别由生物有机肥替代,比较不同处理下的土壤养分含量及葡萄的产量和品质。结果表明,优化水肥及施用生物有机肥替代部分化肥能较好地改善土壤理化性质,提升土壤肥力,促进葡萄生长。其中,B1处理可显著增加葡萄园经济效益,2年平均收益较CK提高33.59%;B2处理提升土壤肥力效果较好,与CK相比,成熟期0—40 cm土层的pH与硝态氮含量均有降低,有机质显著增加,与Opt处理相比,成熟期0—40 cm土层土壤的有效磷、速效钾含量分别显著提升109.90%、32.20%。由此表明,生物有机肥替代部分化肥是实现果园高效、安全、持续生产的有效途径。
中图分类号:
韩秀丽, 李嘉伟, 张杰, 郭艳杰, 张丽娟, 吉艳芝. 生物有机肥替代化肥对葡萄生长与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 195-205.
Xiuli HAN, Jiawei LI, Jie ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Replacing Part of Chemical Fertilizer on Grape Growth and Soil Fertility[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 195-205.
处理 Treatment | 养分投入 Nutrient | 生物有机肥 Bio-organic fertilizer/(kg·hm-2) | 灌水量 Amount of irrigation/m³ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
CK | 176 | 118 | 222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 080 |
Opt | 147 | 98 | 185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 840 |
B1 | 118 | 69 | 164 | 29 | 29 | 21 | 840 |
B2 | 89 | 40 | 143 | 58 | 58 | 42 | 840 |
表1 不同处理的养分投入量和灌水量
Table 1 Nutrient input and irrigation amount of different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 养分投入 Nutrient | 生物有机肥 Bio-organic fertilizer/(kg·hm-2) | 灌水量 Amount of irrigation/m³ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
CK | 176 | 118 | 222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 080 |
Opt | 147 | 98 | 185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 840 |
B1 | 118 | 69 | 164 | 29 | 29 | 21 | 840 |
B2 | 89 | 40 | 143 | 58 | 58 | 42 | 840 |
处理 Treatment | 总酚 Total phenol/(mg·g-1) | 单宁 Tannin/(mg·g-1) | 花色苷 Anthocyanin/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid/% | 可滴定酸 Titratable aci/% | 糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒Grain | 果皮Peel | 籽粒Grain | 果皮Peel | |||||
CK | 28.37±8.19 ab | 7.40±1.76 a | 6.27±3.95 b | 1.17±0.29 b | 1.02±0.74 a | 16.87±1.25 a | 1.19±0.01 a | 14.22±0.99 b |
Opt | 31.09±7.55 ab | 6.91±1.37 a | 12.07±4.31 ab | 1.67±0.82 ab | 1.02±0.27 a | 16.97±0.67 a | 1.23±0.18 a | 13.99±2.17 b |
B1 | 23.12±1.89 b | 7.25±2.49 a | 7.25±3.84 b | 0.98±0.54 b | 0.82±0.06 b | 17.80±0.36 a | 1.02±0.21 ab | 18.04±3.88 ab |
B2 | 21.05±5.31 b | 6.80±1.40 a | 15.35±4.45 a | 2.21±0.86 a | 1.10±0.25 a | 17.17±1.85 a | 0.87±0.07 b | 19.70±0.53 a |
表3 不同施肥处理的葡萄品质
Table 3 Grape quality of different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 总酚 Total phenol/(mg·g-1) | 单宁 Tannin/(mg·g-1) | 花色苷 Anthocyanin/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solid/% | 可滴定酸 Titratable aci/% | 糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒Grain | 果皮Peel | 籽粒Grain | 果皮Peel | |||||
CK | 28.37±8.19 ab | 7.40±1.76 a | 6.27±3.95 b | 1.17±0.29 b | 1.02±0.74 a | 16.87±1.25 a | 1.19±0.01 a | 14.22±0.99 b |
Opt | 31.09±7.55 ab | 6.91±1.37 a | 12.07±4.31 ab | 1.67±0.82 ab | 1.02±0.27 a | 16.97±0.67 a | 1.23±0.18 a | 13.99±2.17 b |
B1 | 23.12±1.89 b | 7.25±2.49 a | 7.25±3.84 b | 0.98±0.54 b | 0.82±0.06 b | 17.80±0.36 a | 1.02±0.21 ab | 18.04±3.88 ab |
B2 | 21.05±5.31 b | 6.80±1.40 a | 15.35±4.45 a | 2.21±0.86 a | 1.10±0.25 a | 17.17±1.85 a | 0.87±0.07 b | 19.70±0.53 a |
生育期 Stage | 处理Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—20 | 20—40 | 40—60 | 60—80 | 80—100 | ||
萌芽期 Budding stage | CK | 8.13±0.02αb | 8.29±0.01 αa | 8.31±0.02 αa | 8.33±0.01 αb | 8.39±0.03 αa |
Opt | 8.09±0.06 αb | 8.24±0.01 αa | 8.27±0.02 αa | 8.32±0.01 αa | 8.34±0.01 αa | |
B1 | 8.14±0.09 αa | 8.26±0.04 αa | 8.29±0.05 αa | 8.33±0.04 αa | 8.25±0.11 αa | |
B2 | 8.11±0.07 αa | 8.24±0.05 αa | 8.27±0.01 αa | 8.31±0.04 αa | 8.33±0.11 αa | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 8.11±0.09 αb | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.30±0.01 αa | 8.28±0.05 αb | 8.36±0.01 αa |
Opt | 8.11±0.04 αb | 8.28±0.05 αa | 8.29±0.06 αa | 8.29±0.06 αa | 8.36±0.03 αa | |
B1 | 8.07±0.06 αa | 8.30±0.05 αa | 8.26±0.04 αa | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.28±0.04 αa | |
B2 | 8.15±0.02 αa | 8.19±0.06 αab | 8.25±0.04 αa | 8.29±0.04 αa | 8.30±0.04 αa | |
膨大期 Expansion stage | CK | 8.23±0.06 αb | 8.33±0.07 αa | 8.29±0.05 αa | 8.29±0.06 αb | 8.38±0.05 αa |
Opt | 8.21±0.09 αab | 8.39±0.16 αa | 8.29±0.04 αa | 8.25±0.04 αa | 8.35±0.10 αa | |
B1 | 8.07±0.03 αa | 8.30±0.05 αa | 8.26±0.07 αa | 8.31±0.09 αa | 8.28±0.09 αa | |
B2 | 8.15±0.07 αa | 8.19±0.07 αab | 8.25±0.11 αa | 8.29±0.03 αa | 8.30±0.08 αa | |
成熟期 Mature stage | CK | 8.35±0.06 αa | 8.41±0.14 αa | 8.33±0.14 αa | 8.41±0.04 αa | 8.33±0.04 αa |
Opt | 8.26±0.07 αa | 8.38±0.05 αa | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.34±0.03 αa | 8.31±0.09 αa | |
B1 | 8.11±0.01 βa | 8.16±0.06 βb | 8.20±0.09 αa | 8.27±0.15 αa | 8.27±0.08 αa | |
B2 | 7.97±0.04 γb | 8.14±0.01 βb | 8.21±0.05 αa | 8.24±0.02 αa | 8.25±0.04 αa |
表4 不同施肥处理的土壤pH
Table 4 Soil pH of different fertilization treatments
生育期 Stage | 处理Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—20 | 20—40 | 40—60 | 60—80 | 80—100 | ||
萌芽期 Budding stage | CK | 8.13±0.02αb | 8.29±0.01 αa | 8.31±0.02 αa | 8.33±0.01 αb | 8.39±0.03 αa |
Opt | 8.09±0.06 αb | 8.24±0.01 αa | 8.27±0.02 αa | 8.32±0.01 αa | 8.34±0.01 αa | |
B1 | 8.14±0.09 αa | 8.26±0.04 αa | 8.29±0.05 αa | 8.33±0.04 αa | 8.25±0.11 αa | |
B2 | 8.11±0.07 αa | 8.24±0.05 αa | 8.27±0.01 αa | 8.31±0.04 αa | 8.33±0.11 αa | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 8.11±0.09 αb | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.30±0.01 αa | 8.28±0.05 αb | 8.36±0.01 αa |
Opt | 8.11±0.04 αb | 8.28±0.05 αa | 8.29±0.06 αa | 8.29±0.06 αa | 8.36±0.03 αa | |
B1 | 8.07±0.06 αa | 8.30±0.05 αa | 8.26±0.04 αa | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.28±0.04 αa | |
B2 | 8.15±0.02 αa | 8.19±0.06 αab | 8.25±0.04 αa | 8.29±0.04 αa | 8.30±0.04 αa | |
膨大期 Expansion stage | CK | 8.23±0.06 αb | 8.33±0.07 αa | 8.29±0.05 αa | 8.29±0.06 αb | 8.38±0.05 αa |
Opt | 8.21±0.09 αab | 8.39±0.16 αa | 8.29±0.04 αa | 8.25±0.04 αa | 8.35±0.10 αa | |
B1 | 8.07±0.03 αa | 8.30±0.05 αa | 8.26±0.07 αa | 8.31±0.09 αa | 8.28±0.09 αa | |
B2 | 8.15±0.07 αa | 8.19±0.07 αab | 8.25±0.11 αa | 8.29±0.03 αa | 8.30±0.08 αa | |
成熟期 Mature stage | CK | 8.35±0.06 αa | 8.41±0.14 αa | 8.33±0.14 αa | 8.41±0.04 αa | 8.33±0.04 αa |
Opt | 8.26±0.07 αa | 8.38±0.05 αa | 8.31±0.05 αa | 8.34±0.03 αa | 8.31±0.09 αa | |
B1 | 8.11±0.01 βa | 8.16±0.06 βb | 8.20±0.09 αa | 8.27±0.15 αa | 8.27±0.08 αa | |
B2 | 7.97±0.04 γb | 8.14±0.01 βb | 8.21±0.05 αa | 8.24±0.02 αa | 8.25±0.04 αa |
生育期 Stage | 处理Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—20 | 20—40 | 40—60 | 60—80 | 80—100 | ||
萌芽期 Budding stage | CK | 10.44±2.95 αa | 6.30±1.12 βc | 8.48±0.78 αa | 7.47±0.36 αa | 3.41±0.90 βbc |
Opt | 11.83±1.56 αa | 10.68±0.13 αa | 6.06±1.50 βa | 6.63±0.38 αa | 5.54±0.12 αa | |
B1 | 12.71±1.74 αa | 9.95±2.15 αa | 6.26±0.57 βa | 6.46±1.20 αa | 5.37±0.84 αa | |
B2 | 12.89±1.55 αa | 9.07±0.85 αa | 8.30±0.71 αa | 7.14±1.16 αa | 6.06±0.41 αab | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 12.17±0.30 αa | 10.24±0.50 αa | 3.70±2.10 βb | 3.80±1.83 αb | 3.00±0.66 βc |
Opt | 12.80±0.82 αa | 9.29±0.36 αb | 5.60±0.10 αβa | 5.14±0.09 αb | 4.02±0.22 αβbc | |
B1 | 12.30±0.54 αa | 11.72±0.44 αa | 8.04±1.47 αa | 6.50±2.39 αa | 4.87±0.78 αa | |
B2 | 13.00±1.87 αa | 11.23±2.50 αa | 8.20±1.51 αa | 5.43±1.54 αa | 4.83±0.99 αb | |
膨大期 Expansion stage | CK | 9.85±1.99 αa | 8.06±0.74 αβb | 5.85±0.91 βb | 5.05±0.60 αb | 4.93±0.88 αβa |
Opt | 9.47±1.06 αa | 7.04±0.95 βc | 4.72±0.59 βa | 4.62±0.71 αb | 4.28±0.83 βb | |
B1 | 11.91±2.91 αa | 8.64±2.81 αβa | 6.42±1.35 αβa | 7.35±2.41 αa | 6.03±0.42 αβa | |
B2 | 12.60±2.13 αa | 10.20±0.76 αa | 8.67±1.97 αa | 7.55±1.44 αa | 6.54±1.11 αa | |
成熟期 Mature stage | CK | 9.75±1.06 γa | 5.39±0.18 βc | 5.47±0.43 βγb | 4.44±0.08 αβb | 4.52±0.58 βγab |
Opt | 10.23±2.79 βγa | 6.56±0.88 βc | 4.10±1.95 γa | 2.14±0.29 βc | 3.05±0.59 γc | |
B1 | 13.38±1.74 αβa | 10.06±1.60 αa | 7.08±0.46 αβa | 5.87±1.92 αa | 5.79±1.72 αβa | |
B2 | 13.96±0.51 αa | 11.43±0.71 αa | 8.95±0.14 αa | 6.08±2.11 αa | 6.48±0.29 αab |
表5 不同施肥处理的土壤有机质含量
Table 5 Soil organic matter content of different fertilization treatments
生育期 Stage | 处理Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—20 | 20—40 | 40—60 | 60—80 | 80—100 | ||
萌芽期 Budding stage | CK | 10.44±2.95 αa | 6.30±1.12 βc | 8.48±0.78 αa | 7.47±0.36 αa | 3.41±0.90 βbc |
Opt | 11.83±1.56 αa | 10.68±0.13 αa | 6.06±1.50 βa | 6.63±0.38 αa | 5.54±0.12 αa | |
B1 | 12.71±1.74 αa | 9.95±2.15 αa | 6.26±0.57 βa | 6.46±1.20 αa | 5.37±0.84 αa | |
B2 | 12.89±1.55 αa | 9.07±0.85 αa | 8.30±0.71 αa | 7.14±1.16 αa | 6.06±0.41 αab | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 12.17±0.30 αa | 10.24±0.50 αa | 3.70±2.10 βb | 3.80±1.83 αb | 3.00±0.66 βc |
Opt | 12.80±0.82 αa | 9.29±0.36 αb | 5.60±0.10 αβa | 5.14±0.09 αb | 4.02±0.22 αβbc | |
B1 | 12.30±0.54 αa | 11.72±0.44 αa | 8.04±1.47 αa | 6.50±2.39 αa | 4.87±0.78 αa | |
B2 | 13.00±1.87 αa | 11.23±2.50 αa | 8.20±1.51 αa | 5.43±1.54 αa | 4.83±0.99 αb | |
膨大期 Expansion stage | CK | 9.85±1.99 αa | 8.06±0.74 αβb | 5.85±0.91 βb | 5.05±0.60 αb | 4.93±0.88 αβa |
Opt | 9.47±1.06 αa | 7.04±0.95 βc | 4.72±0.59 βa | 4.62±0.71 αb | 4.28±0.83 βb | |
B1 | 11.91±2.91 αa | 8.64±2.81 αβa | 6.42±1.35 αβa | 7.35±2.41 αa | 6.03±0.42 αβa | |
B2 | 12.60±2.13 αa | 10.20±0.76 αa | 8.67±1.97 αa | 7.55±1.44 αa | 6.54±1.11 αa | |
成熟期 Mature stage | CK | 9.75±1.06 γa | 5.39±0.18 βc | 5.47±0.43 βγb | 4.44±0.08 αβb | 4.52±0.58 βγab |
Opt | 10.23±2.79 βγa | 6.56±0.88 βc | 4.10±1.95 γa | 2.14±0.29 βc | 3.05±0.59 γc | |
B1 | 13.38±1.74 αβa | 10.06±1.60 αa | 7.08±0.46 αβa | 5.87±1.92 αa | 5.79±1.72 αβa | |
B2 | 13.96±0.51 αa | 11.43±0.71 αa | 8.95±0.14 αa | 6.08±2.11 αa | 6.48±0.29 αab |
指标Index | pH | 有机质 Organic matter | 硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen | 速效磷 Available phosphorus | 有效钾 Available potassium | 总酚 Total phenol | 单宁Tannin | 花色苷Anthocyanin | 可溶性固形物 Solubility solids |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 Organic matter | -0.910** | ||||||||
硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen | 0.869** | -0.822** | |||||||
速效磷 Available phosphorus | -0.341 | 0.477 | -0.445 | ||||||
有效钾 Available potassium | -0.533 | 0.502 | -0.676* | 0.261 | |||||
总酚 Total phenol | 0.478 | -0.684* | 0.446 | -0.503 | -0.464 | ||||
单宁 Tannin | -0.425 | 0.250 | -0.147 | -0.185 | 0.006 | 0.093 | |||
花色苷 Anthocyanin | 0.196 | -0.223 | 0.159 | -0.071 | -0.061 | -0.102 | 0.253 | ||
可溶性固形物 Solubility solids | -0.239 | 0.266 | -0.524 | 0.085 | 0.285 | 0.189 | -0.261 | -0.575 | |
可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 0.748** | -0.712** | 0.700* | -0.475 | -0.439 | 0.653* | -0.141 | -0.038 | -0.091 |
表6 土壤指标与葡萄品质的相关性
Table 6 Correlation between soil indexes and grape quality
指标Index | pH | 有机质 Organic matter | 硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen | 速效磷 Available phosphorus | 有效钾 Available potassium | 总酚 Total phenol | 单宁Tannin | 花色苷Anthocyanin | 可溶性固形物 Solubility solids |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质 Organic matter | -0.910** | ||||||||
硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen | 0.869** | -0.822** | |||||||
速效磷 Available phosphorus | -0.341 | 0.477 | -0.445 | ||||||
有效钾 Available potassium | -0.533 | 0.502 | -0.676* | 0.261 | |||||
总酚 Total phenol | 0.478 | -0.684* | 0.446 | -0.503 | -0.464 | ||||
单宁 Tannin | -0.425 | 0.250 | -0.147 | -0.185 | 0.006 | 0.093 | |||
花色苷 Anthocyanin | 0.196 | -0.223 | 0.159 | -0.071 | -0.061 | -0.102 | 0.253 | ||
可溶性固形物 Solubility solids | -0.239 | 0.266 | -0.524 | 0.085 | 0.285 | 0.189 | -0.261 | -0.575 | |
可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 0.748** | -0.712** | 0.700* | -0.475 | -0.439 | 0.653* | -0.141 | -0.038 | -0.091 |
处理 Treatment | 投入/(元·hm-2) Input/ (yuan·hm-2) | 2019 | 2020 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 收益/(元·hm-2) Economic profits/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio | 产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 收益/(元·hm-2) Economic profits/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio | |||
CK | 24 373.98 | 40 943.22± 7 622.09 b | 16 569.24± 7 622.09 b | 1.68±0.31 b | 42 079.95± 2 432.63 c | 17 705.97± 2 432.63 b | 1.73± 0.10 c | |
Opt | 22 828.32 | 54 224.24± 12 134.94 ab | 31 395.92± 12 134.94 a | 2.38±0.53 a | 44 259.79± 2 682.49 c | 21 431.47± 2 682.49 b | 1.94± 0.12 b | |
B1 | 24 881.04 | 55 870.11± 2 453.50 ab | 30 989.07± 2 453.50 a | 2.25±0.10 ab | 55 043.16± 724.21 a | 30 162.12± 724.21 a | 2.21± 0.03 a | |
B2 | 26 933.76 | 48 200.19± 2 043.73 ab | 21 266.44± 2 043.73 b | 1.79±0.08 ab | 48 572.93± 2 637.13 b | 21 639.17± 2 637.13 b | 1.80± 0.01 bc |
表7 不同施肥处理下葡萄经济效益
Table 7 Economic benefits of grape under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 投入/(元·hm-2) Input/ (yuan·hm-2) | 2019 | 2020 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 收益/(元·hm-2) Economic profits/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio | 产值/(元·hm-2) Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 收益/(元·hm-2) Economic profits/(yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio | |||
CK | 24 373.98 | 40 943.22± 7 622.09 b | 16 569.24± 7 622.09 b | 1.68±0.31 b | 42 079.95± 2 432.63 c | 17 705.97± 2 432.63 b | 1.73± 0.10 c | |
Opt | 22 828.32 | 54 224.24± 12 134.94 ab | 31 395.92± 12 134.94 a | 2.38±0.53 a | 44 259.79± 2 682.49 c | 21 431.47± 2 682.49 b | 1.94± 0.12 b | |
B1 | 24 881.04 | 55 870.11± 2 453.50 ab | 30 989.07± 2 453.50 a | 2.25±0.10 ab | 55 043.16± 724.21 a | 30 162.12± 724.21 a | 2.21± 0.03 a | |
B2 | 26 933.76 | 48 200.19± 2 043.73 ab | 21 266.44± 2 043.73 b | 1.79±0.08 ab | 48 572.93± 2 637.13 b | 21 639.17± 2 637.13 b | 1.80± 0.01 bc |
1 | 国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2021:1-945. |
2 | 郭巨秋.河北省苹果园土壤养分状况与变化研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2020. |
GUO J Q. Study on soil nutrient status and change of apple orchard in Hebei province [D]. Baoding: Hebei Agriculture University, 2020. | |
3 | FONTES J, YEBOAH E, OFORI P, et al.. Fertilizer and residue quality effects on organic matter stabilization in soil aggregates [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2009, 73(3):961-966. |
4 | 寇长林,骆晓声,巨晓棠.优化施氮对设施番茄土壤硝态氮残留及土壤氮平衡的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(5):837-848. |
KOU C L, LUO X S, JU X T. Effects of optimal nitrogen fertilization on N balance and nitrate-N accumulation in greenhouse tomato fields [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2021, 27(5):837-848. | |
5 | 仝倩倩,祝英,崔得领,等.我国微生物肥料发展现状及在蔬菜生产中的应用[J].中国土壤与肥料,2022(4):259-266. |
TONG Q Q, ZHU Y, CUI D L, et al.. The development status of microbial fertilizer in China and its application in vegetable planting [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2022(4):259-266. | |
6 | 倪幸,窦春英,丁立忠,等.有机物料对山核桃林地土壤的培肥改良效果[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(5):1266-1275. |
NI X, DOU C Y, DING L Z, et al.. Organic materials improved the soil fertility in Carya cathayensis forest lands [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2018, 24(5):1266-1275. | |
7 | 周超.有机肥部分替代化学肥料对苹果园土壤养分和生物活性的影响[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2018. |
ZHOU C. Effect of partial substitution of organic fertilizers on soil nutrients and biological activity in apple orchard [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2018. | |
8 | 申小冉,徐明岗,张文菊,等.长期不同施肥对土壤各粒级组分中氮含量及分配比例的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(5):1127-1134. |
SHEN X R, XU M G, ZHANG W J, et al.. Effect of various long-term fertilizations on soil nitrogen concentration and distribution percentage in particle-size fractions [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2012, 18(5):1127-1134. | |
9 | 任静,刘小勇,韩富军,等.施氮水平对旱塬覆沙苹果园土壤酶活性及果实品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(8):206-213. |
REN J, LIU X Y, HAN F J, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer levels on soil enzyme activity and fruit quality of sand-covered apple orchard in Loess Plateau of Eastern Gansu [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2019, 35(8):206-213. | |
10 | IQBAL A, HE L, ALI I, et al.. Manure combined with chemical fertilizer increases rice productivity by improving soil health, post-anthesis biomass yield, and nitrogen metabolism [J/OL]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(10):e0238934 [2022-09-15]. . |
11 | 王慧,卜容燕,韩上,等.有机肥配施化肥对直播油菜产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021(6):156-165. |
WANG H, BU R Y, HAN S, et al.. The effects of chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer on the yields,nutrient uptake and utilization of direct-seeding rapeseed [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. Chin., 2021(6):156-165. | |
12 | 周喜荣,张丽萍,孙权,等.有机肥与化肥配施对果园土壤肥力及鲜食葡萄产量与品质的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2019,53(6):861-868. |
ZHOU X R, ZHANG L P, SUN Q, et al.. Effects of combined organic fertilizer with chemical fertilizer on soil fertility in orchard and yield and quality of table grape [J]. J. Henan Agric.Univ., 2019, 53(6):861-868. | |
13 | 李水祥.有机肥替代部分化肥对蜜柚树体营养及果实品质的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2019. |
LI S X. Effects of chemical fertilizer partialy substituted by organicfertilizer on the nutrition and fruit quality of pomelo trees [D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019. | |
14 | SANJARIMIJANI M, SIROUSMEHR A R, FAKHERI B. The effects of drought stress and humic acid on morphological traits, yield and anthocyanin of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) [J]. Agroecology, 2016, 8(3):346-358. |
15 | 刘璐.两种微生物菌剂对土壤特性及赤霞珠葡萄果实品质的影响[D].银川:宁夏大学, 2016. |
LIU L. Effects of two microbial agents on soil properties and Cabernet sauvignon grape quality [D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2016. | |
16 | TOMIĆ J, PEŠAKOVIĆ M, MILIVOJEVIĆ J, et al.. How to improve strawberry productivity, nutrients composition, and beneficial rhizosphere microflora by biofertilization and mineral fertilization [J]. J. Plant Nutr., 2018, 41(13/16):2009-2021. |
17 | YUAN G, JIA C, LI Z, et al.. Effect of brassinosteroids on drought resistance and abscisic acid concentration in tomato under water stress [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2010, 126(2):103-108. |
18 | 谢凯,宋晓晖,董彩霞,等.不同有机肥处理对黄冠梨生长及果园土壤性状的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(1):214-222. |
XIE K, SONG X H, DONG C X, et al.. Effects of different organic fertilizers on tree growth and soil property in Huangguan pear orchard [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2013, 19(1): 214-222. | |
19 | 王志慧,马振朝,张丽娟,等.河北葡萄园施肥与土壤养分演变及其对产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2020(7):106-115. |
WANG Z H, MA Z C, ZHANG L J, et al.. Fertilization and soil nutrient evolution of vineyards in Hebei and its impact on yield [J]. Northern Hortic., 2020(7):106-115. | |
20 | 佟鑫,马振朝,张子涛,等.河北省赤霞珠葡萄土壤养分情况与叶片营养诊断分析[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(13):146-151. |
TONG X, MA Z C, ZHANG Z T, et al.. Analysis of soil nutrients and leaf nutrition diagnosis of chaxia bead grapes in Hebei province [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2021, 49(13):146-151. | |
21 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:1-495. |
22 | 牛雪,张军翔,徐国前.葡萄与葡萄酒中总酚测定方法的研究进展[J].食品与机械,2016(3):239-242. |
NIU X, ZHANG J X, XU G Q. Research progress on determination of total polyphenols in grape and wine [J]. Food Mach., 2016(3):239-242. | |
23 | 杨夫臣,吴江,程建徽,等.葡萄果皮花色素的提取及其理化性质[J].果树学报,2007,24(3):287-292. |
YANG F C, WU J, CHENG J H, et al.. Studies on extr action and physical-chemical properties of anthocyanin from Red Globe grape peel [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2007, 24(3):287-292. | |
24 | 王华.葡萄与葡萄酒实验技术操作规范[M].西安:西安地图出版社,1999:1-327. |
25 | 段鑫垚.不同行内覆盖处理对葡萄园土壤性质和葡萄果实品质的影响研究 [D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021. |
DUAN X Y. Research on the influence of different in-row mulching treatments on soil properties and berry quality in vineyard [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021. | |
26 | BOŻENA D, JACEK D, ANNA P, et al.. The impact of a bio-fertilizer on the soil organic matter status and carbon sequestration-results from a field-scale study [J]. J. Soil Sediment., 2016, 16(10):2335-2343. |
27 | YUAN G F, JIA C G, LI Z, et al.. Effect of brassinosteroids on drought resistance and abscisic acid concentration in tomato under water stress [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2010, 126(2):103-108. |
28 | 杨雪,王添,谢永丽,等.解淀粉芽孢杆菌DGL1促燕麦生长分子机制及代谢通路探究[J].草地学报,2022,30(11):2899-2909. |
YANG X, WANG T, XIE Y L, et al.. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DGL1 promotes Avena sativa growth and the underlying molecular mechanism of metabolic pathways [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2022, 30(11):2899-2909. | |
29 | 吴莉.贺兰山东麓不同品种酿酒葡萄与葡萄酒中酚类和香气物质积累的比较研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2020. |
WU L. Comparative study on the accumulation of phenols and aroma substances in different grape varieties and wines at the eastern foot of Helan Mountain [D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2020. | |
30 | 胡禧熙,王迪,鲁会玲,等.限根栽培模式对‘夏黑’葡萄园土壤pH及养分含量的影响[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2020(4):25-28. |
HU X X, WANG D, LU H L, et al.. Effect of root restriction cultivation pattern on soil pH and nutrient content of ‘Summer Black’ vineyard [J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine Wine, 2020(4):25-28. | |
31 | ZERIHUN A, MCCLYMONT L, LANYON D, et al.. Deconvoluting effects of vine and soil properties on grape berry composition [J]. J. Sci. Food. Agric., 2015, 95(1):193-203. |
32 | 周娟,袁珍贵,郭莉莉,等.土壤酸化对作物生长发育的影响及改良措施[J].作物研究,2013,27(1):96-102. |
33 | LI J L, LIANG Y Y, LIU W J, et al.. Effects of manure substituting chemical nitrogen fertilizer on rubber seedling growth and soil environment [J]. J. Appl. Ecol., 2022, 33(2):431-438. |
34 | 谢丽华,李玲玲,谢军红,等.有机肥替代化肥对陇中旱区玉米生长及农田碳排放的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(6):1029-1038. |
XIE L H, LI L L, XIE J H, et al.. Effects of substitution of chemical fertilizer by organic fertilizer on maize growth and field carbon emission in dry farming area of Longzhong, Gansu province [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2022, 28(6):1029-1038. | |
35 | 赵健宇,王凤新,孟潮彪,等.生物有机肥对马铃薯产量与土壤氮循环作用机制研究[J].农业机械学报,2022,53(4):343-351. |
ZHAO J Y, WANG F X, MENG C B, et al.. Mechanism of bio-organic fertilizer on potato yield and soil nitrogen-cycling [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2022, 53(4):343-351. | |
36 | 岳文俊,张富仓,李志军,等.水氮耦合对甜瓜氮素吸收与土壤硝态氮累积的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(2):88-96, 119. |
YUE W J, ZHANG F C, LI Z J, et al.. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on nitrogen uptake of muskmelon and nitrate accumulation in soil [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2015, 46(2):88-96, 119. | |
37 | 宋建强,屈慧鸽,梁海忠,等.‘蛇龙珠’葡萄园土壤指标与葡萄酒理化指标相关性分析[J].西北农业学报,2018,27(6):863-870. |
SONG J Q, QU H G, LIANG H Z, et al.. Correlation analysis between soil indicators and physiochemical indexes of wine composition in ‘Cabernet Gernischt’vineyard [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2018, 27(6):863-870. | |
38 | 张筠筠.化肥减施对酿酒葡萄园土壤质量及酿酒葡萄产量品质的影响研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2019. |
ZHANG J J. Effect of fertilizer reduction on soil quality and wine grape quality and yield at the vineyard [D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2019. |
[1] | 高丽敏, 顾泽辰, 贡雪菲, 崔联明, 郭东森, 周影, 王琳, 魏启舜. 果园生草对中国果树-土壤系统生产性能影响的Meta分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 184-194. |
[2] | 陈芙蓉, 熊伟仡, 尹娇, 张小卓, 韩宇, 邓毅书. 微生物菌剂对叶菜废弃物堆肥过程的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 146-154. |
[3] | 阿什日轨, 张荣萍, 周宁宁, 冯婷煜, 周林, 马鹏, 阿尔力色, 廖雪环, 张坷塬. 硅钙钾镁肥和密度对水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 155-163. |
[4] | 赵刚, 王淑英, 李尚中, 张建军, 党翼, 王磊, 李兴茂, 程万莉, 周刚, 倪胜利, 樊廷录. 黄土旱塬区近40年降水对冬小麦耗水和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 164-173. |
[5] | 表达特征分析, 姚亮伟, 沙玉柱, 郭新羽, 蒲小宁, 徐英, 王继卿, 李少斌, 郝志云, 刘秀. 不同海拔藏绵羊肉品质、营养成分及肉质相关基因[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 66-75. |
[6] | 李忠义, 唐红琴, 董文斌, 韦彩会, 何铁光. 稻秸-紫云英联合还田对水稻光合特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(2): 171-180. |
[7] | 刘峰峰, 吴明, 周迎辉, 吴勇, 田嘉树, 许嘉阳, 许自成, 何结望. 生长素与钼配施对烤烟上部叶生理代谢及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(2): 208-215. |
[8] | 金艳, 宋全昊, 宋佳静, 陈亮, 赵立尚, 陈杰, 白冬, 朱统泉. 69份小麦种质资源的综合性评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(2): 33-45. |
[9] | 王辉, 付虹雨, 岳云开, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 基于气候变量的苎麻产量SSA-BP预测模型[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 110-118. |
[10] | 房彦飞, 罗晓颖, 唐江华, 孙婷婷, 王鲁振, 唐甜, 徐文修. 播种方式对旱地春小麦产量、干物质及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 173-181. |
[11] | 曾婷, 侯萌, 王耀, 彭博, 汤博宇, 赵晓蕊, 隋跃宇, 焦晓光. 不同土地利用类型对土壤纤维素酶活性及肥力因子的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 193-200. |
[12] | 张海军, 张娟, 贾毅男, 王江龙, 冯丽. 不同架式对‘南太湖特早’葡萄果实香气成分及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 201-213. |
[13] | 段媛媛, 刘晓洪, 唐涛, 王帆帆, 游景茂, 郭晓亮, 郭杰. 种植密度对湖北贝母生长及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 197-206. |
[14] | 周影, 李京咏, 戴林秀, 敖弟彩, 李梓逸, 杨帆, 顾军伟, 徐强, 窦志, 高辉. 稻虾共作模式下喷施褪黑素对水稻产量形成和抗倒伏特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 34-42. |
[15] | 王为, 赵强, 穆妮热·阿卜杜艾尼, 阿里木·阿木力null, 李欣欣, 田阳青. 烯效唑复配不同外源物质对棉花化学封顶及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 57-68. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||