中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 146-155.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0391
付硕硕1(), 龚伟勇2, 林逸轩1, 李渊顺2, 刘澄灿3, 倪林1(
)
收稿日期:
2024-05-15
接受日期:
2024-08-06
出版日期:
2025-05-15
发布日期:
2025-05-20
通讯作者:
倪林
作者简介:
付硕硕 E-mail:f2019125140@163.com;
基金资助:
Shuoshuo FU1(), Weiyong GONG2, Yixuan LIN1, Yuanshun LI2, Chengcan LIU3, Lin NI1(
)
Received:
2024-05-15
Accepted:
2024-08-06
Online:
2025-05-15
Published:
2025-05-20
Contact:
Lin NI
摘要:
为优化福建柏叶总二萜提取工艺并研究其抑菌活性,通过响应面法对福建柏叶总二萜提取工艺进行优化,并采用菌丝生长速率法探究福建柏叶总二萜对6种植物病原真菌的抑制活性,以胶孢炭疽菌作为供试菌,进一步对菌丝生理生化指标的变化及保护酶活性进行测定。结果表明,福建柏叶总二萜的最佳工艺条件如下:使用无水乙醇作为提取溶剂,提取温度为79 ℃,提取时间为53 min,液料比为14.5 mL∶1 g。在此条件下,福建柏叶总二萜得率为36.8%。福建柏叶总二萜对胶孢炭疽菌抑制效果较好,EC50值为1.466 mg·mL-1。经福建柏叶总二萜处理后的胶孢炭疽菌菌丝干重显著降低、电导率升高、还原糖含量显著增加、抗氧化酶活性先升高后降低。以上研究结果为福建柏叶的资源利用奠定基础。
中图分类号:
付硕硕, 龚伟勇, 林逸轩, 李渊顺, 刘澄灿, 倪林. 福建柏叶总二萜提取工艺优化及抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 146-155.
Shuoshuo FU, Weiyong GONG, Yixuan LIN, Yuanshun LI, Chengcan LIU, Lin NI. Optimization of Extraction Technology and Antifungal Activity of Total Diterpene from Fokienia Hodginsii[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 146-155.
水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
A:时间 Time/min | B:温度 Temperature/℃ | C:液料比 Liquid-solid ratio/(mL·g-1) | |
-1 | 50 | 75 | 10∶1 |
0 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 |
1 | 70 | 85 | 20∶1 |
表1 响应面试验因素水平
Table 1 Factor and level of response surface
水平 Level | 因素Factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
A:时间 Time/min | B:温度 Temperature/℃ | C:液料比 Liquid-solid ratio/(mL·g-1) | |
-1 | 50 | 75 | 10∶1 |
0 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 |
1 | 70 | 85 | 20∶1 |
图2 不同条件下福建柏叶总二萜得率A:提取时间;B:提取温度;C:液料比
Fig. 2 Extraction rate of total diterpene from Fokienia hodginsii under different conditionsA: Extraction time; B: Extraction time; C: Liquid-solid ratio
编号 Serial number | A:时间 Time/min | B:温度 Temperature/℃ | C:液料比 Liquid-material/(mL·g-1) | 得率 Yield/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 70 | 85 | 15∶1 | 26.28 |
2 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 37.20 |
3 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 36.66 |
4 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 36.18 |
5 | 60 | 75 | 20∶1 | 25.20 |
6 | 60 | 75 | 10∶1 | 30.72 |
7 | 60 | 85 | 20∶1 | 24.60 |
8 | 50 | 75 | 15∶1 | 29.82 |
9 | 50 | 80 | 10∶1 | 28.68 |
10 | 70 | 75 | 15∶1 | 31.08 |
11 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 35.94 |
12 | 50 | 80 | 20∶1 | 28.68 |
13 | 50 | 85 | 15∶1 | 28.56 |
14 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 36.72 |
15 | 70 | 80 | 20∶1 | 24.78 |
16 | 60 | 85 | 10∶1 | 24.00 |
17 | 70 | 80 | 10∶1 | 27.90 |
表2 响应面试验结果
Table 2 Experimental results of response surface test
编号 Serial number | A:时间 Time/min | B:温度 Temperature/℃ | C:液料比 Liquid-material/(mL·g-1) | 得率 Yield/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 70 | 85 | 15∶1 | 26.28 |
2 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 37.20 |
3 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 36.66 |
4 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 36.18 |
5 | 60 | 75 | 20∶1 | 25.20 |
6 | 60 | 75 | 10∶1 | 30.72 |
7 | 60 | 85 | 20∶1 | 24.60 |
8 | 50 | 75 | 15∶1 | 29.82 |
9 | 50 | 80 | 10∶1 | 28.68 |
10 | 70 | 75 | 15∶1 | 31.08 |
11 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 35.94 |
12 | 50 | 80 | 20∶1 | 28.68 |
13 | 50 | 85 | 15∶1 | 28.56 |
14 | 60 | 80 | 15∶1 | 36.72 |
15 | 70 | 80 | 20∶1 | 24.78 |
16 | 60 | 85 | 10∶1 | 24.00 |
17 | 70 | 80 | 10∶1 | 27.90 |
方差来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value | 显著性 Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型Model | 352.02 | 9 | 39.11 | 84.25 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
A | 4.06 | 1 | 4.06 | 8.75 | 0.021 2 | * | |
B | 22.38 | 1 | 22.38 | 48.20 | 0.000 2 | ** | |
C | 8.08 | 1 | 8.08 | 17.40 | 0.004 2 | * | |
AB | 3.13 | 1 | 3.13 | 6.75 | 0.035 5 | * | |
AC | 2.43 | 1 | 2.43 | 5.24 | 0.055 8 | ||
BC | 9.36 | 1 | 9.36 | 20.17 | 0.002 8 | * | |
A2 | 40.79 | 1 | 40.79 | 87.86 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
B2 | 84.98 | 1 | 84.98 | 183.04 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
C2 | 147.44 | 1 | 147.44 | 317.57 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
残差Residual | 3.25 | 7 | 0.46 | ||||
失拟Lack of fit | 2.28 | 3 | 0.76 | 3.12 | 0.149 9 | ||
纯误差Pure error | 0.97 | 4 | 0.24 | ||||
总计Total | 355.27 | 16 |
表3 回归模型与方差分析
Table 3 Regression model and variance analysis
方差来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value | 显著性 Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型Model | 352.02 | 9 | 39.11 | 84.25 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
A | 4.06 | 1 | 4.06 | 8.75 | 0.021 2 | * | |
B | 22.38 | 1 | 22.38 | 48.20 | 0.000 2 | ** | |
C | 8.08 | 1 | 8.08 | 17.40 | 0.004 2 | * | |
AB | 3.13 | 1 | 3.13 | 6.75 | 0.035 5 | * | |
AC | 2.43 | 1 | 2.43 | 5.24 | 0.055 8 | ||
BC | 9.36 | 1 | 9.36 | 20.17 | 0.002 8 | * | |
A2 | 40.79 | 1 | 40.79 | 87.86 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
B2 | 84.98 | 1 | 84.98 | 183.04 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
C2 | 147.44 | 1 | 147.44 | 317.57 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
残差Residual | 3.25 | 7 | 0.46 | ||||
失拟Lack of fit | 2.28 | 3 | 0.76 | 3.12 | 0.149 9 | ||
纯误差Pure error | 0.97 | 4 | 0.24 | ||||
总计Total | 355.27 | 16 |
图5 不同总二萜处理下对胶孢炭疽菌的菌丝干重注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 5 Dry weight of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz. of different total diterpenoids treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图6 福建柏叶总二萜处理下胶孢炭疽菌的生理生化指标注:不同小写字母表示同一时间不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig 6 Physiological and biochemical indexs of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz.treated with total diterpene from Fokienia hodginsiiNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same time at P<0.05 level.
1 | DU X M, CHEN X D, REN X L, et al.. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Fokienia hodginsii (Cupressaceae),an endangered tree [J]. Conserv. Genet. Resour., 2018, 10(4): 813-815. |
2 | DAO H H T, HOLSCHER D. Fujian cypress and two other threatened tree species in three conservation zones of a nature reserve in north-western Vietnam [J/OL]. For. Ecosyst., 2017, 4(1):9 [2024-04-20]. . |
3 | 林际朗,陈贻谋.福建省主要林木病害名录[J].福建林业科技,1990(1):76-79. |
4 | WU X D, HE J, LI X Y, et al.. Diterpenoids from the twigs and leaves of Fokienia hodginsii [J]. J. Nat. Prod., 2013, 76(6):1032-1038. |
5 | 周成城,徐文达,陈凌艳,等.福建柏种质资源的保护和利用研究进展[J].亚热带农业研究,2019,15(4):271-278. |
ZHOU C C, XU W D, CHEN L Y, et al.. Research progress on protection and utilization of Fokienia hodginsii germplasm resources [J]. Subtrop. Agric. Res., 2019, 15(4): 271-278. | |
6 | ZHANG Y, FU J R, PAN Z Z, et al.. Chemical constituents from the leaves of Fokienia hodginsii [J].Chem. Nat. Compd.,2023, 59(3): 553-555. |
7 | 邓韵,蔡妙颜,田野,等.溪黄草不同溶剂提取物中总二萜含量的测定[J].现代食品科技, 2005, 21(2): 153-154, 157. |
DENG Y, CAI M Y, TIAN Y, et al.. Determination of diterpenoids in different solvent extraction from Rabdosia serra (Maxim.) Hara [J].Mod. Food Sci. Technol., 2005, 21(2):153-154, 157. | |
8 | 周天娇,李春燕,韩莉萍,等.超声辅助提取尾叶香茶菜总二萜工艺研究[J].中医药学报,2018,46(3):77-80. |
ZHOU T J, LI C Y, HAN L P, et al.. Extraction process of total diterpenoids from Rabdosia excise by ultrasonic-assisted extraction method [J]. Acta Chin. Med. Pharmacol., 2018, 46(3):77-80. | |
9 | 段志芳,陈庆华.超声波法提取溪黄草中总二萜的最佳工艺研究[J].时珍国医国药,2006(12):2436-2438. |
DUAN Z F, CHEN Q H. Optimum ultrasonic technology in extracting diterpenoids from Rabdosiaseea (Maxim.) Hara. [J]. Lishizhen Med. Materia Medica, 2006(12):2436-2438. | |
10 | 马瑞丽,李敏,徐秀泉,等.大孔吸附树脂制备尾叶香茶菜总二萜的工艺研究[J].中成药, 2014, 36(4): 848-851. |
11 | 袁堂丰,瞿利民,郭婕.响应面法优化罗汉松总二萜提取及抗氧化研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2019,39(6):114-120, 127. |
YUAN T F, QU L M, GUO J. Response surface methodology for optimization of extracting total diterpenoids from Podocarpus macrophyllus and their antioxidant activity [J]. J.Cent. South Univ. For. Technol., 2019, 39(6):114-120, 127. | |
12 | 吴钜文,陈建峰.植物源农药及其安全性[J].植物保护,2002,28(4):39-41. |
WU J W, CHEN J F. Pesticides originated from plants and their safety [J]. Plant Prot., 2002,28(4):39-41. | |
13 | WOO K W, CHOI S U, PARK J C, et al.. A new lignan glycoside from Juniperus rigida [J]. Arch. Pharm. Res., 2011,34(12): 2043-2049. |
14 | 倪林,邱亚铁,李艳蕾,等.HPLC法同时测定闽产圆齿野鸦椿中两种色原酮碳苷的含量[J].林产化学与工业,2018,38(4):103-108. |
NI L, QIU Y T, LI Y L, et al.. Simultaneous determination of isobiflorin and biflorin in Fujian Euscaphis japonica by HPLC [J]. Chem. Ind. For. Prod., 2018, 38(4):103-108. | |
15 | 李艳蕾,黄闰玲,邱亚铁,等.圆齿野鸦椿中isobiflorin和biflorin的超声提取工艺[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 48(2): 204-209. |
LI Y L, HUANG R L, QIU Y T, et al.. Ultrasonic extraction technology of isobiflorin and biflorin from Euscaphis konishii Hayata [J]. J.Fujian Agric.For.Univ.(Nat.Sci.), 2019,48(2):204-209. | |
16 | 张耀,林智熠,周文娟,等.圆齿野鸦椿枝条抗辣椒疫霉病菌活性成分[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2021,50(4):472-479. |
ZHANG Y, LIN Z Y, ZHOU W J, et al.. Chemical constituents against Phytophthora capsici from twigs of Euscaphis konishii Hayata [J]. J. Fujian Agric.For.Univ.(Nat.Sci.), 2021,50(4):472-479. | |
17 | 陈啸,陈源桉,傅钰萍,等.β-香树脂醇对水稻纹枯病菌的抑菌作用[J].亚热带农业研究,2022,18(3):192-197. |
CHEN X, CHEN Y A, FU Y P, et al.. Antifungal effects of β-amyrin against rice sheath blight, Rhizoctonia solani [J]. Subtrop. Agric. Res., 2022, 18(3):192-197. | |
18 | 潘镇泽,傅佳蕊,郑威,等.红豆树异黄酮类成分抑制番茄灰霉病菌的活性研究[J].福建农业学报,2022,37(6):794-801. |
PAN Z Z, FU J R, ZHENG W, et al.. Inhibitory activity of isoflavones from Ormosia hosiei seeds against Botrytis cinerea [J]. Fujian J. Agric. Sci., 2022, 37(6):794-801. | |
19 | RATNAWATI D, LUSIAN A, MARTONO A, et al.. Study on the potency of methanol extracts from Xanthosoma nigrum stellfeld as natural antioxidant by thiobarbituric acid method [J/OL]. Aceh Int. J. Sci. Technol., 2014, 2(3):1007 [2024-04-20]. . |
20 | 孟凡国,史红专,王嘉,等.蚂蟥与梨形环棱螺营养成分的相关性研究[J].中国中药杂志,2013,38(12):1915-1918. |
MENG F G, SHI H Z, WANG J, et al.. Correlation analysis between nutritive components of Whitmania pigra and Bellamya purificata [J]. China J. Chin. Mater. Med., 2013,38(12):1915-1918. | |
21 | 王江宏,刘艳,桑敏,等.硒对紫球藻抗氧化酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J].热带海洋学报,2011,30(3):94-98. |
WANG J H, LIU Y, SANG M, et al.. Effect of selenium on antioxidant enzyme activity and malondialdehyde content of Porphyridium sp [J]. J. Trop. Oceanogr., 2011, 30(3):94-98. | |
22 | 沈文飚,徐朗莱,叶茂炳,等.氮蓝四唑光化还原法测定超氧化物歧化酶活性的适宜条件[J].南京农业大学学报,1996,19(2):101-102. |
SHEN W B, XU L L, YE M B, et al.. The suitable conditions for determining SOD activity by nitro blue trtrazolium (NBT) photoreduction method [J]. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ., 1996, 19(2):101-102. | |
23 | LI W, FU J R, ZHENG L J, et al.. Two new bibenzyls from Pleione grandiflora (Rolfe) Rolfe and their antioxidant activity [J]. Nat. Prod. Res., 2023,37(15):2486-2492. |
24 | WU M T, WU X Q, ZHENG L J, et al.. Discovery of glucosyloxybenzyl 2-hydroxy-2-isobutylsuccinates with anti-inflammatory activities from Pleione grandiflora [J/OL].Fitoterapia, 2021,155:105062 [2024-04-20]. . |
25 | 曹付威,刘福林,任莹莹,等.益母草二萜类化合物的提取工艺及其抑菌活性[J].山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)学报,2021,42(10):739-743. |
CAO F W, LIU F L, REN Y Y, et al.. Eextraction technology of diterpenoids from Leonurus japonicas and its antimicrobial activity[J]. J. Shandong First Med. Univ. Shandong Acad. Med. Sci., 2021, 42(10):739-743. | |
26 | 袁堂丰.罗汉松化学成分分离及抑制酪氨酸酶活性研究[D].吉首:吉首大学,2019. |
YUAN T F. Isolation on chemical constituents from Podocarpus macrophllus and their tyrosinase inhibition activity [D]. Jishou: Jishou University,2019. | |
27 | 魏晴,郑双,何兰凤,等.响应面法优化米槁叶片黄酮的提取工艺[J].化学工程师,2022,36(7):84-88, 62. |
WEI Q, ZHENG S, HE L F, et al.. Response surface methodology to optimize the extraction process of flavonoids from Cinnamomum migao H.W.Li leaves [J]. Chem. Eng., 2022, 36(7): 84-88, 62. | |
28 | 陈雁雁,赵雅兰,张淑香,等.Box-Behnken响应面法优化柴胡多糖的超声提取工艺[J].化学工程师,2022,36(2):71-75, 81. |
CHEN Y Y, ZHAO Y L, ZHANG S X, et al.. Optimize the ultrasonic extraction process of Bupleurum polysaccharides by Box-Behnken response surface method [J]. Chem.Eng., 2022,36(2):71-75, 81. | |
29 | XIE Z Q, DING L F, WANG D S, et al.. Sesquiterpenes from the leaves of Magnolia delavayi franch.and their cytotoxic activities [J/OL]. Chem. Biodivers., 2019, 16(5):e1900013 [2024-04-20]. . |
30 | 闫海燕.砂地柏中具杀虫活性的二萜类及香豆素类化合物的分离[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007. |
YAN H Y. Study on onsecticidal activety of diterpenoids and coumarins fromSabina vulgaris Ant. [D]. Yangling:Northwest A&F University, 2007. | |
31 | 杨婷,史红安,李聪丽,等.13种萜类化合物对胶孢炭疽菌和链格孢的抑制活性[J].植物保护,2017,43(2):192-195. |
YANG T, SHI H A, LI C L, et al.. Antifungal activity of 13 terpenoid compounds against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Alternaria sp [J]. Plant Prot., 2017, 43(2):192-195. | |
32 | 丁兰,何苗,王保强,等.4种萜类化合物对蝴蝶兰茎腐病菌的抑制作用及机理的初步研究[J].植物保护,2014,40(3):42-47, 57. |
DING L, HE M, WANG B Q, et al.. Antibacterial activity and related mechanism of four terpenoids on the pathogen of Phalaenopsis amabilis stem rot [J]. Plant Prot., 2014, 40(3):42-47, 57. | |
33 | LEONORA M, SEPúLVEDA C, RICARDO M, et al.. Characterization of the antifungal activity against botrytis cinerea of sclareol and 13-epi-sclareol, two labdane-type diterpenoids [J]. J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 2015, 60(3):3024-3028. |
[1] | 苗春霖, 许欢欢, 贾紫毅, 何爱民, 吉洋洋, 牟德华, 高山. 分心木水提物的抗氧化性分析及组分鉴定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 182-192. |
[2] | 冯长龙, 宁辰阳, 朱艺鑫, 李树平, 黄春光. 树干绷带环形缠绕机构设计与优化研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 122-132. |
[3] | 张如艳, 李绅昊, 朱奇鹏, 冯太纲, 李红波, 邢泽炳, 羡瑜. 生物炭含量对园林绿化废弃物/聚乳酸复合材料物理力学性能影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 192-200. |
[4] | 冯长龙, 黄春光, 宁辰阳, 李树平, 陈科锦. 植树机挖坑机构螺旋式钻头性能特性优化研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 89-98. |
[5] | 王雪, 郑星, 任佳淼, 赵亚周, 彭文君. 基于Plackett-Burman设计和响应面法优化枣花蜂蜜挥发性成分的萃取条件[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 181-192. |
[6] | 郗婧怡, 王双庆, 白一彤, 姚秀利, 黄碧璇, 李青怡, 范丽清, 黄世臣, 孙明国. 响应面法优化黑水虻处理餐厨垃圾工艺参数研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 241-249. |
[7] | 傅丽君, 林潇雨, 林建华, 沈慧男, 吴勇镇. 红松茸牛肉酱加工工艺及货架期研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 148-158. |
[8] | 张岚雄, 郑威, 陈源桉, 沈婧, 邹双全, 伍建榕, 倪林. 樟叶总木脂素提取工艺及其抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 138-147. |
[9] | 季梦婷, 陈长江, 罗流河, 林志坚, 詹梦琳, 杨丙烨, 胡方平, 蔡学清. 福建猕猴桃细菌性枯萎病的病原菌鉴定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 144-152. |
[10] | 刘东玲, 司皓, 郑宝江, 张玉红. 响应面法优化酶解辅助-超声提取菥蓂中的黑芥子苷[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 225-233. |
[11] | 纪蕾, 李红艳, 王颖, 姜晓东, 刘天红, 李晓, 孙元芹, 刘洪军. 番茄味膨化虾片加工工艺优化及香气组分分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 140-153. |
[12] | 李琦, 张树林, 张达娟, 贾滢暄, 王泽斌. 响应面法改良牟氏角毛藻培养基[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 225-233. |
[13] | 赵秀英, 黄晴雯, 曹浩杰, 王杰, 李瑞姣, 聂冬霞, 韩铮, 赵志辉. 响应面法优化禾谷镰刀菌产脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇及其衍生物的液体培养条件[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(7): 222-233. |
[14] | 张一龙, 孙晓梵, 李硕, 李培英, 孙宗玖. 不同抗旱性狗牙根种质的抗旱生理响应差异分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 59-70. |
[15] | 肖芬芳, 张从合, 王慧, 叶亚峰, 张道林, 汪和廷, 李波, 吴跃进, 刘斌美. 杂交水稻花粉收集装置气力输送系统仿真优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 110-122. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||