Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (8): 109-115.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0392
• INTELLIGENT AGRICULTURE & AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY • Previous Articles
Fengguang HE(), Ganran DENG(
), Zhende CUI, Shuang ZHENG, Guojie LI, Ling LI, Shuangmei QIN
Received:
2021-05-10
Accepted:
2021-07-26
Online:
2022-08-15
Published:
2022-08-22
Contact:
Ganran DENG
何冯光(), 邓干然(
), 崔振德, 郑爽, 李国杰, 李玲, 覃双眉
通讯作者:
邓干然
作者简介:
何冯光 E-mail: 879909560@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Fengguang HE, Ganran DENG, Zhende CUI, Shuang ZHENG, Guojie LI, Ling LI, Shuangmei QIN. Operating Performance of Self-propelled Silage Cassava Stem and Leaf Harvester[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 109-115.
何冯光, 邓干然, 崔振德, 郑爽, 李国杰, 李玲, 覃双眉. 自走式木薯茎叶青贮饲料收获机作业性能研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(8): 109-115.
Fig. 1 Structure of self-propelled cassava stems and leaves silage harvesterNote:1—Collection bucket; 2—Oil tank; 3—Frame; 4—Steering wheel; 5—Engine; 6—Throwing system; 7—Chopper unit; 8—Driving wheel; 9—Conveying system; 10—Hydraulic lifting; 11—Disc cutter; 12—Pallet disc; 13—Header assembly; 14—Actuating system; 15—Wheelhouse.
水平 Level | 因素Factor | |
---|---|---|
x1:圆盘割刀转速Speed of disc cutter/(r·min-1) | x2:前进速度Forward speed/(km·h-1) | |
+γ | 585 | 3.0 |
+1 | 581 | 2.9 |
0 | 535 | 2.0 |
-1 | 489 | 1.1 |
-γ | 485 | 1.0 |
Δi | 46 | 0.9 |
Table 1 Factors level
水平 Level | 因素Factor | |
---|---|---|
x1:圆盘割刀转速Speed of disc cutter/(r·min-1) | x2:前进速度Forward speed/(km·h-1) | |
+γ | 585 | 3.0 |
+1 | 581 | 2.9 |
0 | 535 | 2.0 |
-1 | 489 | 1.1 |
-γ | 485 | 1.0 |
Δi | 46 | 0.9 |
试验号Code | 试验因素 Factor | Loss rate/% | Root break rate/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
x1:圆盘割刀转速 Speed of disc cutter /(r·min-1) | x2:前进速度 Forward speed/(km·h-1) | |||
1 | 581 | 2.9 | 11.01 | 10.78 |
2 | 581 | 1.1 | 11.95 | 8.48 |
3 | 489 | 2.9 | 10.11 | 5.39 |
4 | 489 | 1.1 | 10.45 | 3.15 |
5 | 585 | 1.0 | 11.42 | 9.97 |
6 | 585 | 2.0 | 10.09 | 4.13 |
7 | 535 | 3.0 | 10.19 | 7.59 |
8 | 535 | 1.0 | 10.92 | 5.12 |
9 | 535 | 2.0 | 10.41 | 6.39 |
10 | 535 | 2.0 | 10.39 | 6.36 |
Table 2 Test result
试验号Code | 试验因素 Factor | Loss rate/% | Root break rate/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
x1:圆盘割刀转速 Speed of disc cutter /(r·min-1) | x2:前进速度 Forward speed/(km·h-1) | |||
1 | 581 | 2.9 | 11.01 | 10.78 |
2 | 581 | 1.1 | 11.95 | 8.48 |
3 | 489 | 2.9 | 10.11 | 5.39 |
4 | 489 | 1.1 | 10.45 | 3.15 |
5 | 585 | 1.0 | 11.42 | 9.97 |
6 | 585 | 2.0 | 10.09 | 4.13 |
7 | 535 | 3.0 | 10.19 | 7.59 |
8 | 535 | 1.0 | 10.92 | 5.12 |
9 | 535 | 2.0 | 10.41 | 6.39 |
10 | 535 | 2.0 | 10.39 | 6.36 |
方差来源 Variance | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 平方和 Quadratic sum | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
回归 Regression | 5 | 3.444 99 | 0.689 00 | 906.578 95 | 0.000 00 | ** |
残差 Residual error | 4 | 0.003 05 | 0.000 76 | — | — | — |
总和 Summation | 9 | 3.448 04 | — | — | — | — |
Table 3 Variance analysis of loss rate
方差来源 Variance | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 平方和 Quadratic sum | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
回归 Regression | 5 | 3.444 99 | 0.689 00 | 906.578 95 | 0.000 00 | ** |
残差 Residual error | 4 | 0.003 05 | 0.000 76 | — | — | — |
总和 Summation | 9 | 3.448 04 | — | — | — | — |
项目 Item | 自由度 Degree of reedom | 平方和 Quadratic sum | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | 61 828.877 34 | 61 828.877 34 | 81 353 785.976 75 | 0.000 04 | ** |
x2 | 1 | 30.552 33 | 30.552 33 | 40 200.430 92 | 0.000 07 | ** |
x12 | 1 | 20 523.526 59 | 20 523.526 59 | 27 004 640.252 67 | 0.013 79 | * |
x1x2 | 1 | 170.482 10 | 170.482 10 | 224 318.547 29 | 0.000 04 | ** |
x22 | 1 | 10.412 37 | 10.412 37 | 13 700.492 49 | 0.000 41 | ** |
Table 4 Significant test results of regression coefficient for loss rate
项目 Item | 自由度 Degree of reedom | 平方和 Quadratic sum | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | 61 828.877 34 | 61 828.877 34 | 81 353 785.976 75 | 0.000 04 | ** |
x2 | 1 | 30.552 33 | 30.552 33 | 40 200.430 92 | 0.000 07 | ** |
x12 | 1 | 20 523.526 59 | 20 523.526 59 | 27 004 640.252 67 | 0.013 79 | * |
x1x2 | 1 | 170.482 10 | 170.482 10 | 224 318.547 29 | 0.000 04 | ** |
x22 | 1 | 10.412 37 | 10.412 37 | 13 700.492 49 | 0.000 41 | ** |
方差来源 Variance | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 平方和 Quadratic sum | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
回归 Regression | 5 | 54.916 74 | 10.983 35 | 25 542.674 42 | 0.000 00 | ** |
残差 Residual error | 4 | 0.001 70 | 0.000 43 | — | — | — |
总和 Sum | 9 | 54.918 44 | — | — | — | — |
Table 5 Variance analysis of root broken rate
方差来源 Variance | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 平方和 Quadratic sum | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
回归 Regression | 5 | 54.916 74 | 10.983 35 | 25 542.674 42 | 0.000 00 | ** |
残差 Residual error | 4 | 0.001 70 | 0.000 43 | — | — | — |
总和 Sum | 9 | 54.918 44 | — | — | — | — |
项目 Item | 自由度 Degree of reedom | 平方和 Quadratic sum | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | 161 335.203 65 | 161 335.203 65 | 375 198 148.020 82 | 0.000 00 | ** |
x2 | 1 | 53.422 71 | 53.422 71 | 124 238.868 91 | 0.001 76 | ** |
x12 | 1 | 66 044.184 81 | 66 044.184 81 | 153 591 127.468 75 | 0.000 00 | ** |
x1x2 | 1 | 1.686 04 | 1.686 04 | 3 921.012 09 | 0.218 99 | — |
x22 | 1 | 0.015 64 | 0.015 64 | 36.382 87 | 0.650 94 | — |
Table 6 Significant test results of regression coefficient for root broken rate
项目 Item | 自由度 Degree of reedom | 平方和 Quadratic sum | 均方 Mean square | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 1 | 161 335.203 65 | 161 335.203 65 | 375 198 148.020 82 | 0.000 00 | ** |
x2 | 1 | 53.422 71 | 53.422 71 | 124 238.868 91 | 0.001 76 | ** |
x12 | 1 | 66 044.184 81 | 66 044.184 81 | 153 591 127.468 75 | 0.000 00 | ** |
x1x2 | 1 | 1.686 04 | 1.686 04 | 3 921.012 09 | 0.218 99 | — |
x22 | 1 | 0.015 64 | 0.015 64 | 36.382 87 | 0.650 94 | — |
试验号 Number | 试验因素Experimental factor | 损失率 Loss rate/% | 宿根破头率 Root break rate/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
圆盘割刀转速 Speed of disc cutter/(r·min-1) | 前进速度 Forward speed/(km·h-1) | |||
1 | 500 | 2.6 | 10.15 | 6.53 |
2 | 10.22 | 6.44 | ||
3 | 10.18 | 6.35 |
Table 7 Verification results
试验号 Number | 试验因素Experimental factor | 损失率 Loss rate/% | 宿根破头率 Root break rate/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
圆盘割刀转速 Speed of disc cutter/(r·min-1) | 前进速度 Forward speed/(km·h-1) | |||
1 | 500 | 2.6 | 10.15 | 6.53 |
2 | 10.22 | 6.44 | ||
3 | 10.18 | 6.35 |
1 | 田波,王雅鹏.中国饲料产业发展现状与市场整合及政策建议[J].农业现代化研究,2014,35(1):20-24. |
TIAN B, WANG Y P. Current situation, market integration and policy suggestions for feed industry in China [J]. Res. Agric. Modern., 2014, 35(1):20-24. | |
2 | 全国畜牧总站信息中心,中国饲料工业协会信息中心.2019年全国饲料工业发展概况[J].中国饲料,2020(6):31. |
3 | 王蕾,张锋.浅析我国饲料市场的区域结构性特征[J].饲料工业,2018,39(4):61-64. |
WANG L, ZHANG F. An analysis on the structural region characteristic of Chinese feed market [J]. Feed Ind., 2018, 39(4):61-64. | |
4 | 梁海军,秦贵信.中国饲料工业现状及市场影响因素思考[J].中国畜牧杂志,2014,50(14):7-10, 15. |
LIANG H J, QIN G X. Chinese feed industry status and the market influencing factors [J]. Chin. J. Anim. Sci., 2014, 50(14):7-10, 15 | |
5 | 覃才殿.木薯茎秆屑代替木屑高效栽培木耳技术[J].农村新技术,2013,(8):13-14. |
6 | 邓干然,郑爽,李国杰,等.木薯叶饲料化利用技术研究进展[J].饲料工业,2018,39(23):17-22. |
DENG G R, ZHENG S, LI G J, et al.. Research progresses of cassava leaf forage utilization technology [J]. Feed Ind., 2018, 39(23):17-22. | |
7 | 张婷,陈小伟,赵优萍,等.木薯副产物的综合利用现状及发展趋势[J].食品工业科技,2019,40(8):343-349. |
ZHANG T, CHEN X W, ZHAO Y P, et al.. Comprehensive utilization status and development trend of the cassava by products [J]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2019, 40(8):343-349. | |
8 | 徐缓,林立铭,王琴飞,等.木薯嫩茎叶饲料化利用品质分析与评价[J].饲料工业,2016,37(23):18-22. |
XU H, LIN L M, WANG Q F, et al.. Analytic and evaluation of tender stalk and frondage on cassava [J]. Feed Ind., 2016, 37(23):18-22. | |
9 | SUDARMAN A, HAYASHIDA M, PUSPITANING I R, et al.. The use of cassava leaf silage as a substitute for concentrate feed in sheep [J]. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 2016, 48(7):1509-1512. |
10 | 胡琳,王定发,李韦,等.不同精粗比对木薯茎叶型全混合日粮山羊瘤胃降解率的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2016,43(11):2914-2921. |
HU L, WANG D F, LI W, et al.. Effect of different concentrate-roughage ratios on rumen degradability of cassava stems and leaves total mixed ration in goat [J]. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med., 2016, 43(11):2914-2921. | |
11 | LY N, NGOAN L, VERSTEGEN M, et al.. Pig performance increases with the addition of DL-methionine and L-lysine to ensiled cassava leaf protein diets [J]. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 2012, 44(1):165-172. |
12 | BRADBURY J H, DENTON L C. Mild methods of processing cassava leaves to remove cyanogens and conserve key nutrients [J]. Food Chem., 2011, 127(4):1755-1759. |
13 | 盘道兴,杨云,韦继雯,等.青贮饲料资源开发利用的研究现状[J].粮食与饲料工业,2018(11):52-57. |
PAN D X, YANG Y, WEI J W, et al.. Research status of exploitation and utilization of silage resources [J]. Cereal Feed Ind., 2018, (11):52-57. | |
14 | 程佳骏.我国饲料产业进出口贸易与世界经济的关联[J].中国饲料,2019(16):102-105. |
CHENG J J. Associative of associative of china’s feed industry import and export trade and the world economy [J]. China Feed, 2019(16):102-105. | |
15 | 衣晓岩.国内饲料行业发展现状分析[J].山东畜牧兽医,2017,38(8):61-62. |
16 | 邵合勇.青贮饲料收获机国内外发展现状[J].农业工程,2017,7(4):19-21. |
SHAO H Y. Development of silage harvester in domestic and abroad [J]. Agric. Eng., 2018(11):52-57. | |
17 | 包攀峰,吕江南,王加跃,等.青贮饲料收获机械的发展现状与对策[J].粮食与饲料工业,2018(1):42-45. |
BAO P F, LYU J N, WANG J Y, et al.. Research progress and suggestions on harvesting machiner for silage fodder [J]. Cereal Feed Ind., 2018(1):42-45. | |
18 | 陈立东,田可庆,李学永,等.秸秆饲料收获机割台结构设计与切割器力学分析[J].中国农机化学报,2019,40(6):1-4, 10. |
CHEN L D, TIAN K Q, LI X Y, et al.. Structural design and mechanical analysis of the cutter of straw feed harvester [J]. J. Chin. Agric. Mech., 2019, 40(6):1-4, 10. | |
19 | 闵令强,张军强,梁荣庆,等.青贮饲料收获贮存模式及机械设备概述[J].中国农机化学报,2018,39(8):62-66, 75. |
MIN L Q, ZHANG J Q, LIANG R Q, et al.. Overview of harvesting and storage modes of silage and related mechanical equipment [J]. J. Chin. Agric. Mech., 2018, 39(8):62-66, 75. | |
20 | 刘晓,侯加林,李文,等.青饲料收获机割台的设计[J].中国农机化学报,2017,38(6):11-15. |
LIU X, HOU J L, LI W, et al.. Design on header of green fodder harvester [J]. J. Chin. Agric. Mech., 2017, 38(6):11-15. | |
21 | 李博强,张京开,王丽洁,等. 玉米青贮收获机 作业质量: [S].北京:中国农业出版社,2011. |
22 | 黎波,黄志华,叶长青,等. 甘蔗联合收获机 作业质量: [S].北京:中国农业出版社,2016. |
[1] | Tingting SHI, Yulan LIAO, Xuyou PENG, Chenyu YUAN. Design and Optimization of Single Row In-line Cassava Planter [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 115-122. |
[2] | Guanglei CHENG, Jun QIU, Xiaoguang WANG, Tianjun XU, Chuanyong CHEN, Chunyuan ZHANG, Qianqian XIA, Yuanqi WU, Jiuran ZHAO, Ronghuan WANG. Changes of Agronomic Traits, Biomass Yield and Quality of National Silage Maize Combinations (Varieties) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 30-37. |
[3] | Kaiyi SHAO, Zhiyou NIU, Chongyang YU, Wentao WU. Measurement and Analysis on Suspension Velocity of Aquaculture Pellets Feed [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 120-129. |
[4] | Chunyan LIU, Jianwei ZHOU, Xiaofei MA, Zhongkui XIE, Guo YANG. Research Progress on Forage Utilization of Shrub Plants in Arid Area of Northwest China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 28-39. |
[5] | Xing LIU, Jitao WANG, Zhijun HU, Yan LIU, Xiaoguo MU, Haijun ZHANG, Dalin ZHANG, Lei AN, Lin YE. Effects of Planting Density and Feeding Frequency on Growth and Quality of Crucian Carp under Aquaponics System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 192-201. |
[6] | HUANG Yulan§, LONG Shengfeng§, YE Xingzhi, LI Yanying, SHEN Zhangyou, ZHOU Jia, ZHOU Lingzhi, LAO Chengying, WEI Benhui. Study on the Agronomic Characters, Yield and Quality of Cassava in Enshi of Hubei Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 46-55. |
[7] | YE Linwei, TANG Rongnian, LI Chuang. Qualitative Study on Phosphorus Content in Rubber Leaves Based on AE-FFNN Neural Network [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 117-124. |
[8] | CHEN Kaiqiong, YANG Qifang, GOU Qi, LYU Yan, LIU Jianli*. Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Branches and Leaves of Goji and Evaluation of Its Application in Epicormic Silage#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(2): 193-201. |
[9] | GU Shenghao, LU Xianju, WANG Yongjian, GUO Xinyu, . Application of Agricultural Digital Twin System in Crop Production System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 82-89. |
[10] | HAN Sha1, HU Wei1, LI Chenglin1*, ZHAO Bin1, YAO Linlin1, WANG Qi1, SUN Yongjun2*, JU Wenming2. Effects of Intermittent Feeding Mode on Feed, Growth and Digestive Enzyme Activities of Sea Cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus Selenka [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(1): 194-200. |
[11] | HU Hongwen, XIA Yunhong, ZHA Lin, LIU Guiping, LI Qingliang. Influences of Different Feeding Frequencies on Vermicomposting [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9): 162-168. |
[12] | SONG Jinhui, WENG Qiaoyun, LYU Aizhi, YUAN Jincheng, LIU Yinghui*. Influence of Drought Stress on Growth and Quality of Silage Corn at Jointing Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(6): 161-167. |
[13] | CHEN Lan1,2, YANG Xinting1,2, SUN Chuanheng2, WANG Yizhong1, XU Daming2, ZHOU Chao2*. Fish Feeding Prediction Method Based on Adaptive Network Fuzzy Inference System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(2): 91-100. |
[14] | WEI Tianlu1§, DU Shuang2§, GE Yiyuan2*, JIANG Yongcheng2, WANG Junfa2, LIU Dongxu2. Optimum Design and Experiment of Cutter of Chopping Roller of Green Forage Harvester [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(12): 77-87. |
[15] | BAI Hao1, YANG Baolong2, DONG Zhaoqi2, LI Xiaofan2, JIANG Yong2, CHANG Guobin1,2, CHEN Guohong1,2*. Research Progress of miRNA Regulating Residual Feed Intake of Livestock and Poultry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 63-68. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||