Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 58-70.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0226
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Caihong ZHANG1(), Li ZHANG2, Weimin WANG2, Jiongping ZHAO2, Dan HAN1, Zicheng XU1, Zhongwen ZHANG2(
), Huifang SHAO1(
)
Received:
2024-03-22
Accepted:
2024-05-21
Online:
2024-10-15
Published:
2024-10-18
Contact:
Zhongwen ZHANG,Huifang SHAO
张彩虹1(), 张力2, 王卫民2, 赵炯平2, 韩丹1, 许自成1, 张仲文2(
), 邵惠芳1(
)
通讯作者:
张仲文,邵惠芳
作者简介:
张彩虹 E-mail:2642983631@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Caihong ZHANG, Li ZHANG, Weimin WANG, Jiongping ZHAO, Dan HAN, Zicheng XU, Zhongwen ZHANG, Huifang SHAO. Difference Analysis of Different Maturity of Upper Tobacco Leaves Based on Non-targeted Metabolomics[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 58-70.
张彩虹, 张力, 王卫民, 赵炯平, 韩丹, 许自成, 张仲文, 邵惠芳. 基于非靶向代谢组学的上部烟叶不同成熟度差异分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(10): 58-70.
处理 Treatment | SPAD | 采收时间 Harvest time | 外观特征 Appearance character |
---|---|---|---|
BM1 | 30~35 | 移栽后(95±5) d (95±5) d after transplanting | 叶片微显黄色;茎叶角度小于直角,叶片稍弯曲 Leaf is slightly yellow; the stem leaf angle is less than the right angle, and the leaf is slightly curved |
BM2 | 25~30 | 移栽后(100±5) d (100±5) d after transplanting | 叶片淡黄或绿黄各半,主脉1/2以上变白;茎叶角度小于直角,叶片稍弯曲微成弓形 Leaf is yellowish or greenish yellow, and more than 1/2 of the main veins become white; the angle of stem and leaf is less than the right angle, and the leaf is slightly curved into a bow shape |
BM3 | 20~25 | 移栽后(105±5) d (100±5) d after transplanting | 叶片以黄为主,黄多绿少,主脉2/3以上变白,支脉变白1/2以上 Leaf is mainly yellow, with more yellow and less green, more than 2/3 of the main veins become white, and more than 1/2 of the branches become white |
BM4 | 15~20 | 移栽后(110±5) d (100±5) d after transplanting | 叶片全黄,叶脉全白;茎叶角度大于直角,叶片弯曲明显成弓形,叶面皱缩明显 Leaf is yellow and the veins are white; the angle of the stem and leaf is greater than the right angle, the leaf is obviously curved into a bow shape, and the leaf surface is obviously shrunk |
Table 1 Changes of different treatments
处理 Treatment | SPAD | 采收时间 Harvest time | 外观特征 Appearance character |
---|---|---|---|
BM1 | 30~35 | 移栽后(95±5) d (95±5) d after transplanting | 叶片微显黄色;茎叶角度小于直角,叶片稍弯曲 Leaf is slightly yellow; the stem leaf angle is less than the right angle, and the leaf is slightly curved |
BM2 | 25~30 | 移栽后(100±5) d (100±5) d after transplanting | 叶片淡黄或绿黄各半,主脉1/2以上变白;茎叶角度小于直角,叶片稍弯曲微成弓形 Leaf is yellowish or greenish yellow, and more than 1/2 of the main veins become white; the angle of stem and leaf is less than the right angle, and the leaf is slightly curved into a bow shape |
BM3 | 20~25 | 移栽后(105±5) d (100±5) d after transplanting | 叶片以黄为主,黄多绿少,主脉2/3以上变白,支脉变白1/2以上 Leaf is mainly yellow, with more yellow and less green, more than 2/3 of the main veins become white, and more than 1/2 of the branches become white |
BM4 | 15~20 | 移栽后(110±5) d (100±5) d after transplanting | 叶片全黄,叶脉全白;茎叶角度大于直角,叶片弯曲明显成弓形,叶面皱缩明显 Leaf is yellow and the veins are white; the angle of the stem and leaf is greater than the right angle, the leaf is obviously curved into a bow shape, and the leaf surface is obviously shrunk |
指标Index | 日期Date (m/d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6/4 | 6/10 | 6/16 | 6/23 | ||
长势Growth | 株高Plant height/cm | 99.69±4.82 a | 100.40±5.68 a | 100.60±5.56 a | 101.16±5.14 a |
茎围Stem circumference/cm | 9.16±0.47 a | 9.17±0.76 a | 9.17±0.76 a | 9.20±0.12 a | |
有效叶片数Effective leaf number | 13.80±0.84 a | 13.00±1.04 ab | 10.00±1.7 ab | 8.00±4.04 b | |
顶1 叶Top 1 leaf | 叶长Leaf length/cm | 55.64±3.54 a | 56.23±2.13 a | 58.93±0.90 a | 59.53±4.10 a |
叶宽Leaf width/cm | 17.36±3.31 a | 17.86±2.34 a | 20.00±2.29 a | 20.23±3.46 a | |
叶面积Leaf area/cm2 | 965.91±119.80 a | 1 004.26±123.75 a | 1 178.60±121.91 a | 1 204.29±362.19 a | |
顶3叶 Top 3 leaf | 叶长Leaf length/cm | 65.31±5.83 a | 65.73±4.84 a | 66.50±4.82 a | 66.56±6.62 a |
叶宽Leaf width/cm | 20.23±1.98 b | 20.86±1.03 ab | 22.33±0.28 ab | 23.21±1.17 a | |
叶面积Leaf area/cm2 | 1 321.22±114.80 a | 1 371.12±145.79 a | 1 484.94±97.06 a | 1 544.85±215.26 a | |
顶6叶 Top 6 leaf | 叶长Leaf length/cm | 71.86±4.56 a | 72.50±4.09 a | 73.86±2.96 a | 72.96±4.33 a |
叶宽Leaf width/cm | 28.10±1.75 b | 30.33±0.57 a | 30.83±0.28 a | 30.86±1.02 a | |
叶面积Leaf area/cm2 | 2 019.26±170.30 a | 2 198.92±158.05 a | 2 277.10±79.56 a | 2 251.54±198.64 a |
Table 2 Agronomic traits of tobacco at different harvesting maturity
指标Index | 日期Date (m/d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6/4 | 6/10 | 6/16 | 6/23 | ||
长势Growth | 株高Plant height/cm | 99.69±4.82 a | 100.40±5.68 a | 100.60±5.56 a | 101.16±5.14 a |
茎围Stem circumference/cm | 9.16±0.47 a | 9.17±0.76 a | 9.17±0.76 a | 9.20±0.12 a | |
有效叶片数Effective leaf number | 13.80±0.84 a | 13.00±1.04 ab | 10.00±1.7 ab | 8.00±4.04 b | |
顶1 叶Top 1 leaf | 叶长Leaf length/cm | 55.64±3.54 a | 56.23±2.13 a | 58.93±0.90 a | 59.53±4.10 a |
叶宽Leaf width/cm | 17.36±3.31 a | 17.86±2.34 a | 20.00±2.29 a | 20.23±3.46 a | |
叶面积Leaf area/cm2 | 965.91±119.80 a | 1 004.26±123.75 a | 1 178.60±121.91 a | 1 204.29±362.19 a | |
顶3叶 Top 3 leaf | 叶长Leaf length/cm | 65.31±5.83 a | 65.73±4.84 a | 66.50±4.82 a | 66.56±6.62 a |
叶宽Leaf width/cm | 20.23±1.98 b | 20.86±1.03 ab | 22.33±0.28 ab | 23.21±1.17 a | |
叶面积Leaf area/cm2 | 1 321.22±114.80 a | 1 371.12±145.79 a | 1 484.94±97.06 a | 1 544.85±215.26 a | |
顶6叶 Top 6 leaf | 叶长Leaf length/cm | 71.86±4.56 a | 72.50±4.09 a | 73.86±2.96 a | 72.96±4.33 a |
叶宽Leaf width/cm | 28.10±1.75 b | 30.33±0.57 a | 30.83±0.28 a | 30.86±1.02 a | |
叶面积Leaf area/cm2 | 2 019.26±170.30 a | 2 198.92±158.05 a | 2 277.10±79.56 a | 2 251.54±198.64 a |
处理Treatment | 烟碱Nicotine/% | 总氮Total nitrogen/% | 总糖Total sugar/% | 还原糖Reducing sugar/% | 钾Potassium/% | 氯 Chlorine/% | 糖碱比 Sugar alkali ratio | 钾氯比Potassium chloride ratio | 两糖比Two sugar ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BM1 | 2.03±0.03 d | 2.08±0.02 b | 30.77±0.15 a | 23.70±0.26 a | 1.72±0.13 b | 0.19±0.03 b | 15.20±0.26 a | 9.13±1.08 a | 0.77±0.01 b |
BM2 | 2.13±0.01 c | 2.34±0.02 a | 29.77±0.21 b | 22.93±0.76 ab | 1.75±0.16 b | 0.24±0.02 b | 13.98±0.15 b | 7.19±0.46 b | 0.77±0.02 b |
BM3 | 2.28±0.05 b | 1.79±0.03 c | 29.10±0.30 c | 21.93±0.42 bc | 1.93±0.08 ab | 0.40±0.05 a | 12.77±0.19 c | 4.84±0.37 c | 0.75±0.01 b |
BM4 | 2.37±0.02 a | 1.82±0.02 c | 26.63±0.21 d | 21.37±0.55 c | 2.02±0.08 a | 0.37±0.04 a | 11.22±0.16 d | 5.45±0.43 c | 0.80±0.02 a |
Table 3 Chemical composition of tobacco leaves with different harvest maturity
处理Treatment | 烟碱Nicotine/% | 总氮Total nitrogen/% | 总糖Total sugar/% | 还原糖Reducing sugar/% | 钾Potassium/% | 氯 Chlorine/% | 糖碱比 Sugar alkali ratio | 钾氯比Potassium chloride ratio | 两糖比Two sugar ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BM1 | 2.03±0.03 d | 2.08±0.02 b | 30.77±0.15 a | 23.70±0.26 a | 1.72±0.13 b | 0.19±0.03 b | 15.20±0.26 a | 9.13±1.08 a | 0.77±0.01 b |
BM2 | 2.13±0.01 c | 2.34±0.02 a | 29.77±0.21 b | 22.93±0.76 ab | 1.75±0.16 b | 0.24±0.02 b | 13.98±0.15 b | 7.19±0.46 b | 0.77±0.02 b |
BM3 | 2.28±0.05 b | 1.79±0.03 c | 29.10±0.30 c | 21.93±0.42 bc | 1.93±0.08 ab | 0.40±0.05 a | 12.77±0.19 c | 4.84±0.37 c | 0.75±0.01 b |
BM4 | 2.37±0.02 a | 1.82±0.02 c | 26.63±0.21 d | 21.37±0.55 c | 2.02±0.08 a | 0.37±0.04 a | 11.22±0.16 d | 5.45±0.43 c | 0.80±0.02 a |
处理Treatment | 香气质Fragrance temperament | 香气量Aroma amount | 透发性Permeability | 杂气Miscellaneous gas | 细腻程度Delicate degree | 柔和程度Degree of softness | 圆润感Roundness feeling | 刺激性Irritation | 干燥感Dry feeling | 余味Aftertaste | 总分Total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BM1 | 11.50 | 11.50 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 61.00 |
BM2 | 12.00 | 12.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 65.50 |
BM3 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 66.50 |
BM4 | 12.00 | 12.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 64.50 |
Table 4 Sensory quality of tobacco leaves with different harvest maturity
处理Treatment | 香气质Fragrance temperament | 香气量Aroma amount | 透发性Permeability | 杂气Miscellaneous gas | 细腻程度Delicate degree | 柔和程度Degree of softness | 圆润感Roundness feeling | 刺激性Irritation | 干燥感Dry feeling | 余味Aftertaste | 总分Total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BM1 | 11.50 | 11.50 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 61.00 |
BM2 | 12.00 | 12.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 65.50 |
BM3 | 12.50 | 12.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 66.50 |
BM4 | 12.00 | 12.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 5.50 | 64.50 |
1 | 张树堂,杨雪彪,王亚辉,等.不同成熟度烤烟鲜烟叶的组织结构比较[J].烟草科技,2005,38(1):38-40. |
ZHANG S T, YANG X B, WANG Y H,et al.. Comparison of tissue of fresh flue-cured tobacco leaves with different maturity [J].Tob. Sci. Technol., 2005,38(1):38-40. | |
2 | 贾中林,尹启生,戴华鑫,等.烤烟上部烟叶成熟生理特性研究进展[J].烟草科技,2022,55(7):99-112. |
JIA Z L, YIN Q S, DAI H X,et al.. Research progress on physiological characteristics of mature upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Tob. Sci. Technol.,2022,55(7):99-112. | |
3 | 孙立娟,李虎林,金哲,等.不同成熟度烤烟外观特征及化学成分的变化[J].湖北农业科学,2008,47(3):318-320. |
SUN L J, LI H L, JIN Z,et al.. Study on the main chemical component of flue-cured tobacco during maturity stage [J].Hubei Agric. Sci., 2008,47(3):318-320. | |
4 | 刘海业.采收时期对烤烟成熟特性及产质量的影响[D].广州:华南农业大学,2016. |
LIU H Y. Effects of harvest time on maturity characteristics, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2016. | |
5 | 王勇,周冀衡,肖志新,等.不同成熟度对烤烟烟叶品质和安全性指标的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2007,28(3):26-29. |
WANG Y, ZHOU J H, XIAO Z X, et al.. Influence of the different maturity on indexes of quality and security for flue-cured tobacco leaves [J]. Chin. Tob. Sci., 2007,28(3):26-29. | |
6 | 李迪秦,龚湛武,陈一凡,等.不同播种移栽期对烤烟产量与品质影响的多指标模糊评价[J].核农学报,2017,31(11):2258-2264. |
LI D Q, GONG Z W, CHEN Y F,et al.. Multi-index fuzzy evaluation of the effect of different sowing and transplanting date on flue-cured tobacco yield and quality [J]. J. Nucl. Agric.Sci., 2017,31(11):2258-2264. | |
7 | 周健民,沈仁芳.土壤学大辞典[M].北京:科学出版社,2013:1-902. |
ZHOU J M, SHEN R F. Dictionary of Soil Science [M].Beijing:Science Press,2013:1-902. | |
8 | ZI X, ZHOU S, WU B. Alpha-linolenic acid mediates diverse drought responses in maize (Zea mays L.) at seedling and flowering stages [J/OL].Molecules,2022,27(3):771 [2024-02-20]. . |
9 | 袁俊,盛莎莎,刘荣鹏,等.镉胁迫对丹参生理特性和代谢特征的影响[J].植物科学学报,2022,40(3):408-417. |
YUAN J, SHENG S S, LIU R P, et al.. Effects of cadmium on physiological characteristics and metabolic profiles of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge [J]. Plant Sci. J., 2022,40(3):408-417. | |
10 | 彭翠云,汪海燕,史宏志,等.延迟采收对豫中烤烟上部叶生理指标和代谢组学的影响[J].核农学报,2021,35(11):2655-2663. |
PENG C Y, WANG H Y, SHI H Z, et al.. Physiological indexes and metabolomics changes in the upper stalk tobacco leaves under the delaying harvesting in Yuzhong area [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2021,35(11):2655-2663. | |
11 | 高云,许自成.江西烤烟生育期主要气象灾害及防御措施分析[J].山西农业科学,2017,45(10):1686-1690. |
GAO Y, XU Z C. Analysis of main meteorological disasters and prevention measures during the growth period of flue cured tobacco in Jiangxi [J]. J.Shanxi Agric.Sci.,2017,45(10):1686-1690. | |
12 | 孙阳阳,靳志伟,黄明迪,等.SPAD值与鲜烟叶成熟度及烤后烟叶质量的关系[J].中国烟草科学,2016,37(2):42-46. |
SUN Y Y, JIN Z W, HUANG M D, et al.. The relationship of SPAD value,maturity of fresh tobacco leaves and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves [J]. Chin. Tob. Sci.,2016,37(2):42-46. | |
13 | 陈乾锦,池国胜,袁帅,等.鲜烟不同采收成熟度和SPAD值与烤后烟叶质量关系研究[J].江西农业学报,2021,33(1):55-59. |
CHEN Q J, CHI G S, YUAN S, et al.. Study on relationship among harvest maturity, SPAD values and quality of flue-cured tobacco after curing [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2021,33(1):55-59. | |
14 | 张威,刘楠,马雁军,等. 烟草及烟草制品 总植物碱的测定 连续流动(硫氰酸钾)法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2022. |
15 | 刘惠民,王芳,李荣,等. 烟草及烟草制品 总氮的测定连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004. |
16 | 何声宝,张威,罗安娜,等. 烟草及烟草制品 水溶性糖的测定连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019. |
17 | 张威,王芳,王颖,等. 烟草及烟草制品 钾的测定 连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007. |
18 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品 氯的测定 连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011. |
19 | 罗登山,王兵,马宇平,等. 烤烟 烟叶质量风格特色感官评价方法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015. |
20 | VASILEV N, BOCCARD J, LANG G,et al..Structured plant metabolomics for the simultaneous exploration of multiple factors [J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6:37390 [2016-11-17]. . |
21 | PRABHU A H, KANT S, KESARWANI P,et al..Integrative cross-platform analyses identify enhanced heterotrophy as a metabolic hallmark in glioblastoma [J]. Neuro-Oncology,2019,21(3):337-347. |
22 | 杨洋,符云鹏,刘新源,等.豫西烟区上部叶成熟度与品质形成的关系[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(8):79-85. |
23 | 刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:1-335. |
LIU G S.Tobacco Cultivation [M].Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2003:1-335. | |
24 | 樊希彬,李丹,左晓晴,等.气候条件对烟草生长的影响分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016(4):27-30. |
FAN X B, LI D, ZUO X Q, et al.. Effect of climate conditions on tobacco growth [J]. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci., 2016(4):27-30. | |
25 | 宋笑龙,刘芳,宗胜杰,等.不同采收成熟度对烤烟萜类致香化合物及烟叶品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2024,52(2):104-111. |
26 | 关辉,周艳宾,朱宏强,等.采收成熟度对烤烟中上部烟叶品质的影响[J].南方农业,2021,15(24):1-3, 7. |
27 | 张丽,姬厚伟,黄锡娟,等.植物代谢组学及其在烟草上的应用进展[J].中国烟草学报,2015,21(5):126-134. |
ZHANG L, JI H W, HUANG X J, et al.. Plant metabolomics and its application in tobacco [J].Acta Tab. Sin., 2015,21(5):126-134. | |
28 | 向海英,刘欣,逄涛,等.基于非靶向代谢组学的红花大金元不同生育期烟叶代谢图谱差异分析[J].中国烟草学报,2022,28(4):77-84. |
XIANG H Y, LIU X, PANG T, et al.. Differential analysis of metabolic profiles of Honghua Dajinyuan tobacco leaves in different growth stage based on untargeted metabolomics [J].Acta Tab. Sin.,2022,28(4):77-84. | |
29 | BAN Q, WANG X, PAN C, et al.. Comparative analysis of the response and gene regulation in cold resistant and susceptible tea plants [J/OL].PLoS One,2017,12(12):e0188514 [2017-12-16]. . |
30 | 梁太波,张景玲,田雷,等.干旱胁迫下外源甜菜碱和脯氨酸对烤烟抗氧化代谢的影响[J].烟草科技,2013,46(2):68-71. |
LIANG T B, ZHANG J L, TIAN L, et al.. Effects of exogenous glycine betaine and proline on antioxidant metabolism of flue-cured tobacco under drought stress [J]. Tob. Sci. Technol.,2013,46(2):68-71. | |
31 | 宋永骏,刁倩楠,齐红岩.多胺代谢与植物抗逆性研究进展[J].中国蔬菜,2012(18):36-42. |
SONG Y J, DIAO Q N, QI H Y. Research progress on relationship between polyamine metabolism and plant stress resistance [J]. China Veget., 2012(18):36-42. | |
32 | 武模戈,袁刘正.多胺与植物抗逆性关系研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(9):3516-3518. |
WU M G, YUAN L Z. Research progress in the relationship between polyamine and plant resistance [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2008,36(9):3516-3518. | |
33 | OLIVA M, GUY A, GALILI G,et al.. Enhanced production of aromatic amino acids in tobacco plants leads to increased phenylpropanoid metabolites and tolerance to stresses [J/OL].Plant Sci.,2020,11:604349 [2021-1-12]. . |
34 | 王威威,席飞虎,杨少峰,等.烟草烟碱合成代谢调控研究进展[J].亚热带农业研究,2016,12(1):62-67. |
WANG W W, XI F H, YANG S F, et al.. Progress on nicotine metabolism regulation in tobacco [J]. Subtrop.Agric.Res.,2016,12(1):62-67. | |
35 | ZHANG L, ZHANG X T, JI H W, et al.. Metabolic profiling of tobacco leaves at different growth stages or different stalk positions by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [J].Ind.Crops Prod., 2018,116:46-55. |
36 | 贾中林,郑庆霞,戴华鑫,等.烤烟上部叶成熟过程中代谢组的差异分析[J].烟草科技,2023,56(1):1-10. |
JIA Z L, ZHENG Q X, DAI H X, et al.. Differential analysis of metabolome of upper flue-cured tobacco leaf during ripening process [J]. Tob. Sci. Technol., 2023,56(1):1-10. |
[1] | Yongfang ZHANG, Shiyan DONG, Jiaxuan WANG, Xuhu GUO, Chang ZHANG, Yanxing WANG, Yuye WANG, Jingfeng WU, Tianfang BAO, Hongfa ZHANG, Ping YU, Fuheng LI. Analysis of Differential Seed Metabolites Before and After Stratification of Heracleum moellendorffii Hance [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 37-49. |
[2] | Hongbin ZHENG, Cong WANG, Qiliang XI, Zhongwen ZHANG, Weimin WANG, Xin WANG, Jin GUO, Huanhuan HE, Weilong LU, Zicheng XU, Wenchao WANG, Wei JIA. Impact of Nitrogen Application Rate on Metabolism and Quality of Upper Leaves of Yunyan 121 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 215-225. |
[3] | Xuemin JIANG, Xiangqian CHEN, Hongyan LI, Qiyan JIANG. Metabolomic Analysis of Wheat Response to Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 43-56. |
[4] | Yongtao HU, Daibin WANG, Yiyin CHEN, Chao YANG, Linlin ZHENG, Hongzhi SHI, Jianan WANG. Research on Contribution of Different Maturation with Fresh Tobacco Quality to Flue-cured Tobacco Quality [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 157-164. |
[5] | Yingxue ZHU, Qi WANG, Xianfa MA, Yusheng JIAO, Jinxu GAO, Weijia MAO, Jia FU, Xuedong SUN, Ye YUAN. Leaf Color Characteristic Value and Nitrogen Diagnosis Model of Tobacco During Growth Period [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 54-62. |
[6] | Geng LI, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Yuyuan CHENG, Jiang WU, Weidong DUAN, Guangting YIN, Qian LI, Chen CHEN, Fei ZHENG, Yuan LIU, Hongzhi SHI. Effects of Different Organic-inorganic Nitrogen Ratios on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen and Upper Leaf Quality in Nanyang Tobacco Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 175-186. |
[7] | Lingwei SUN, Mengxian HE, Jianjun DAI, Caifeng WU, Defu ZHANG, Yuexia LIN. Metabolomics in Neonatal Lambs of Hu-sheep with Intrauterine Growth Retardation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 123-131. |
[8] | YUAN Jincheng, MENG Yaxuan, SUN Yingqi, ZHAO Xinyue, WANG Fengxia, LIU Yinghui. Application of Metabolome-based Genome-wide Association Study in Plant [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 12-18. |
[9] | LIU Lijia, XU Zhiqiang, HE Jia, DING Yongle, SUN Jutao. Study on Metabolic Difference of Resistance to Black Shot in Tobacco Induced by Trichoderma harzianum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 91-105. |
[10] | LIU Boyuan1, ZHAO Songchao1, LI Yifan2, HE Fan3, YANG Weili4, ZHAO Mingqin1*. Study on Changes of Carbohydrate and Its Related Enzyme Activities during Drying of Cigar with Different Maturities [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 192-201. |
[11] | LYU Penghui1§, ZHANG Zhendong 1§, WANG Ye1, ZHOU Jihong2, SONG Zhenwei3, DUAN Liusheng1, LI Runzhi1*. Preliminary Study on Seed Vigor of Red Clover Seeds with Different Colors [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 58-65. |
[12] | FAN Ningbo1, ZHOU Junxue2, JIANG Kai2, WANG Hong2, SHI Longfei2, GAO Yulong3*, CHEN Yi3*. Membrane Lipid Peroxidation and Its Relationship with Senescence-Related Genes in Main Veins of Flue-Cured Tobacco at Different Maturity Stages#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 66-72. |
[13] | ZHAO Songchao1, TIAN Pei1, LIU Boyuan1, LI Yifan2, ZHAO Mingqin1*. Effects of Air Curing of Different Maturity on Enzymatic Browning and Quality of Cigar Tobacco Leaves [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(5): 51-59. |
[14] | ZHAO Songchao1, ZHAO Zhe1, LI Yifan1, RAO Dongming2, QIN Yanmin2, FENG Xiaohu2, ZHANG Youwu2, ZHAO Mingqin1*. Influence of Planting Density on the Phenomenon of “High Temperature Induced Maturity” in Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 145-154. |
[15] | MA Le, CAI Debao, CHEN Jibao*. Genetic Analysis of Flowering and Maturity Periods of Mungbean RIL Population [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(12): 33-40. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||