Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 138-146.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0702
• ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH • Previous Articles
Jinlin LIU1,2(), Yingying CHEN1,2, Xiaomei LAN1,2, Haiyong CHEN2, Pengsheng LI1,2, Bi QIN3, Ye YANG1,2(
)
Received:
2023-09-21
Accepted:
2023-12-18
Online:
2025-01-15
Published:
2025-01-21
Contact:
Ye YANG
刘锦霖1,2(), 陈莹莹1,2, 蓝晓妹1,2, 陈海永2, 李鹏声1,2, 覃碧3, 杨叶1,2(
)
通讯作者:
杨叶
作者简介:
刘锦霖 E-mail:949630416@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Jinlin LIU, Yingying CHEN, Xiaomei LAN, Haiyong CHEN, Pengsheng LI, Bi QIN, Ye YANG. Identification and Sensitivity to Fungicides of Pathogen Species of Hass Avocado Fruit Anthracnose[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 138-146.
刘锦霖, 陈莹莹, 蓝晓妹, 陈海永, 李鹏声, 覃碧, 杨叶. 哈斯油梨果实炭疽病病原鉴定及杀菌剂敏感性测定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 138-146.
种 Speices | 菌株标号 Strain No. | GenBank 注册号GenBank registration number | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | ACT | TUB | CHS-1 | GAPDH | ||
炭疽菌 Colletotrichum sp. | SA0016 | KP683152.1 | KP683093.1 | KP852490.1 | KP852449.1 | KP852469.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC01 | OR354391.1 | OR365236.1 | OR365248.1 | OR365240.1 | OR365244.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC02 | OR354392.1 | OR365237.1 | OR365249.1 | OR365241.1 | OR365245.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC03 | OR354393.1 | OR365238.1 | OR365250.1 | OR365242.1 | OR365246.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC04 | OR354394.1 | OR365239.1 | OR365251.1 | OR365243.1 | OR365247.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | ICMP18578 | JX010171.1 | JX009518.1 | JX010404.1 | JX009865.1 | JX009924.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | CBS133251 | — | KX093986.1 | KX094289.1 | KX094109.1 | KX094186.1 |
果生炭疽菌 C. fructicola | ICMP18581 | JX010165.1 | JX009501.1 | JX009866.1 | JX010405.1 | JX010033.1 |
果生炭疽菌 C. fructicola | CBS125397 | JX010173.1 | JX009581.1 | — | — | JX010032.1 |
芭蕉炭疽菌 C. musae | BL01 | JQ005777.1 | JQ005840.1 | JX010413.1 | JQ005798.1 | JX010050.1 |
胶孢炭疽菌 C. gloeosporioides | BL22 | MN273080.1 | MN273208.1 | MN273240.1 | MN273144.1 | MN273112.1 |
昌平炭疽菌 C. changpingense | MFLUCC15 | KY214473.1 | KY214470.1 | KY214474.1 | KY214471.1 | KY214472.1 |
隐秘炭疽菌 C. aenigma | ICMP18608 | JX010244.1 | JX009443.1 | — | — | JX010044.1 |
长直孢炭疽菌 C. gigasporum | CBS125475 | MH863697.1 | KF687789.1 | KF687874.1 | KF687766.1 | KF687836.1 |
龙血树炭疽菌 C. dracaenophilum | CBS119360 | MG600711.1 | MG600918.1 | MG600978.1 | MG600834.1 | MG600774.1 |
云南炭疽菌 C. yunnanense | CBS132135 | MH865960.1 | JX519239.1 | JX519248.1 | JX519231.1 | JX546706.1 |
Table 1 Information on strains in the phylogenetic analysis of this study
种 Speices | 菌株标号 Strain No. | GenBank 注册号GenBank registration number | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | ACT | TUB | CHS-1 | GAPDH | ||
炭疽菌 Colletotrichum sp. | SA0016 | KP683152.1 | KP683093.1 | KP852490.1 | KP852449.1 | KP852469.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC01 | OR354391.1 | OR365236.1 | OR365248.1 | OR365240.1 | OR365244.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC02 | OR354392.1 | OR365237.1 | OR365249.1 | OR365241.1 | OR365245.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC03 | OR354393.1 | OR365238.1 | OR365250.1 | OR365242.1 | OR365246.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC04 | OR354394.1 | OR365239.1 | OR365251.1 | OR365243.1 | OR365247.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | ICMP18578 | JX010171.1 | JX009518.1 | JX010404.1 | JX009865.1 | JX009924.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | CBS133251 | — | KX093986.1 | KX094289.1 | KX094109.1 | KX094186.1 |
果生炭疽菌 C. fructicola | ICMP18581 | JX010165.1 | JX009501.1 | JX009866.1 | JX010405.1 | JX010033.1 |
果生炭疽菌 C. fructicola | CBS125397 | JX010173.1 | JX009581.1 | — | — | JX010032.1 |
芭蕉炭疽菌 C. musae | BL01 | JQ005777.1 | JQ005840.1 | JX010413.1 | JQ005798.1 | JX010050.1 |
胶孢炭疽菌 C. gloeosporioides | BL22 | MN273080.1 | MN273208.1 | MN273240.1 | MN273144.1 | MN273112.1 |
昌平炭疽菌 C. changpingense | MFLUCC15 | KY214473.1 | KY214470.1 | KY214474.1 | KY214471.1 | KY214472.1 |
隐秘炭疽菌 C. aenigma | ICMP18608 | JX010244.1 | JX009443.1 | — | — | JX010044.1 |
长直孢炭疽菌 C. gigasporum | CBS125475 | MH863697.1 | KF687789.1 | KF687874.1 | KF687766.1 | KF687836.1 |
龙血树炭疽菌 C. dracaenophilum | CBS119360 | MG600711.1 | MG600918.1 | MG600978.1 | MG600834.1 | MG600774.1 |
云南炭疽菌 C. yunnanense | CBS132135 | MH865960.1 | JX519239.1 | JX519248.1 | JX519231.1 | JX546706.1 |
种 Speices | 菌株标号 Strain No. | GenBank 注册号GenBank registration number | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | ACT | TUB | CHS-1 | GAPDH | ||
C. coelogynes | CBS 132504 | MG600713.1 | MG600920.1 | MG600980.1 | MG600836.1 | MG600776.1 |
C. cattleyicola | CBS 17049 | MG600758.1 | MG600963.1 | MG601025.1 | MG600866.1 | MG600819.1 |
大豆炭疽菌C. sojae | CBS 128510 | MG600751.1 | MG600956.1 | MG601018.1 | MG600862.1 | MG600812.1 |
芭蕉生炭疽菌C. musicola | CBS 127557 | MG600737.1 | MG600943.1 | MG601004.1 | MG600854.1 | MG600799.1 |
C. panamense | CBS 125386 | MG600766.1 | MG600970.1 | MG601033.1 | MG600873.1 | MG600826.1 |
C. merremiae | CBS 124955 | MG600765.1 | MG600969.1 | MG601032.1 | MG600872.1 | MG600825.1 |
短孢炭疽菌C. brevisporum | CBS 129958 | MG600763.1 | MG600967.1 | MG601030.1 | MG600870.1 | MG600823.1 |
甘薯毛链孢Monilochaetes infuscans | CBS 869.96 | JQ005780.1 | JQ005843.1 | JQ005864.1 | JQ005801.1 | JX546612.1 |
Table 1 Information on strains in the phylogenetic analysis of this study
种 Speices | 菌株标号 Strain No. | GenBank 注册号GenBank registration number | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | ACT | TUB | CHS-1 | GAPDH | ||
C. coelogynes | CBS 132504 | MG600713.1 | MG600920.1 | MG600980.1 | MG600836.1 | MG600776.1 |
C. cattleyicola | CBS 17049 | MG600758.1 | MG600963.1 | MG601025.1 | MG600866.1 | MG600819.1 |
大豆炭疽菌C. sojae | CBS 128510 | MG600751.1 | MG600956.1 | MG601018.1 | MG600862.1 | MG600812.1 |
芭蕉生炭疽菌C. musicola | CBS 127557 | MG600737.1 | MG600943.1 | MG601004.1 | MG600854.1 | MG600799.1 |
C. panamense | CBS 125386 | MG600766.1 | MG600970.1 | MG601033.1 | MG600873.1 | MG600826.1 |
C. merremiae | CBS 124955 | MG600765.1 | MG600969.1 | MG601032.1 | MG600872.1 | MG600825.1 |
短孢炭疽菌C. brevisporum | CBS 129958 | MG600763.1 | MG600967.1 | MG601030.1 | MG600870.1 | MG600823.1 |
甘薯毛链孢Monilochaetes infuscans | CBS 869.96 | JQ005780.1 | JQ005843.1 | JQ005864.1 | JQ005801.1 | JX546612.1 |
杀菌剂Fungicide | 剂量Dosage/(mg·L-1) | 溶剂Solvent |
---|---|---|
吡噻菌胺Penthiopyrad | 0.1、0.5、1.0、2.0、5.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
多菌灵Carbendazim | 0.02、0.10、0.50、2.50、12.50 | 0.1 mol·L-1 HCl |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 0.01、0.05、0.10、0.20、0.50 | 丙酮Acetone |
苯醚甲环唑Difenoconazole | 0.1、0.5、1.0、2.0、5.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
嘧菌酯Azoxystrobin | 0.1、0.5、1.0、5.0、10.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
吡唑醚菌酯Pyraclostrobin | 0.1、0.5、1.0、5.0、10.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
咯菌腈Fludioxonil | 16、32、48、64、80 | 丙酮Acetone |
百菌清Chlorothalonil | 10、20、40、50、60 | 丙酮Acetone |
溴菌腈Bromothalonil | 50、75、100、150、200 | 丙酮Acetone |
Table 2 Fungicide and final dosages
杀菌剂Fungicide | 剂量Dosage/(mg·L-1) | 溶剂Solvent |
---|---|---|
吡噻菌胺Penthiopyrad | 0.1、0.5、1.0、2.0、5.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
多菌灵Carbendazim | 0.02、0.10、0.50、2.50、12.50 | 0.1 mol·L-1 HCl |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 0.01、0.05、0.10、0.20、0.50 | 丙酮Acetone |
苯醚甲环唑Difenoconazole | 0.1、0.5、1.0、2.0、5.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
嘧菌酯Azoxystrobin | 0.1、0.5、1.0、5.0、10.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
吡唑醚菌酯Pyraclostrobin | 0.1、0.5、1.0、5.0、10.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
咯菌腈Fludioxonil | 16、32、48、64、80 | 丙酮Acetone |
百菌清Chlorothalonil | 10、20、40、50、60 | 丙酮Acetone |
溴菌腈Bromothalonil | 50、75、100、150、200 | 丙酮Acetone |
杀菌剂 Fungicide | 菌株 Strain | 回归方程 Regression equation | R² | EC50/(mg·L-1) | 平均EC50 Average EC50/(mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
吡噻菌胺Penthiopyrad | HNPC01 | y=-0.397 8x+5.890 0 | 0.89 | 2.24 | 2.86 |
HNPC02 | y=-0.526 6x+6.434 5 | 0.96 | 2.72 | ||
HNPC03 | y=-0.488 8x+6.522 4 | 0.95 | 3.12 | ||
HNPC04 | y=-0.494 3x+6.669 0 | 0.98 | 3.38 | ||
多菌灵Carbendazim | HNPC01 | y=0.413 6x+3.206 9 | 0.98 | 4.34 | 4.29 |
HNPC02 | y=0.421 0x+3.202 8 | 0.97 | 4.27 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.411 0x+3.263 6 | 0.96 | 4.22 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.408 7x+3.227 6 | 0.95 | 4.34 | ||
嘧菌酯Azoxystrobin | HNPC01 | y=0.286 8x+4.903 4 | 0.98 | 2.17 | 2.09 |
HNPC02 | y=0.267 0x+4.949 2 | 0.97 | 1.55 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.303 2x+4.845 6 | 0.99 | 3.23 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.267 1x+4.958 7 | 0.99 | 1.43 | ||
吡唑醚菌酯Pyraclostrobin | HNPC01 | y=0.212 5x+4.396 2 | 0.88 | 2.84 | 2.71 |
HNPC02 | y=0.263 9x+4.370 8 | 0.91 | 2.38 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.163 0x+4.453 7 | 0.93 | 3.35 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.246 7x+4.440 9 | 0.95 | 2.27 | ||
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | HNPC01 | y=0.937 0x+6.002 6 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
HNPC02 | y=1.446 9x+6.323 1 | 0.96 | 0.12 | ||
HNPC03 | y=1.040 4x+6.010 7 | 0.90 | 0.11 | ||
HNPC04 | y=1.289 1x+6.153 5 | 0.93 | 0.13 | ||
苯醚甲环唑Difenoconazole | HNPC01 | y=0.350 0x+4.167 0 | 0.97 | 2.38 | 2.63 |
HNPC02 | y=0.425 5x+3.865 7 | 0.95 | 2.67 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.335 7x+4.099 5 | 0.97 | 2.68 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.381 8x+3.940 1 | 0.98 | 2.78 | ||
咯菌腈Fludioxonil | HNPC01 | y=0.619 2x+3.992 7 | 0.96 | 42.35 | 60.19 |
HNPC02 | y=0.593 6x+3.949 1 | 0.94 | 58.94 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.636 0x+3.822 2 | 0.98 | 71.12 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.614 3x+3.872 9 | 0.97 | 68.36 | ||
百菌清Chlorothalonil | HNPC01 | y=2.218 1x+1.697 5 | 0.97 | 30.82 | 31.03 |
HNPC02 | y=2.071 3x+2.198 7 | 0.94 | 22.51 | ||
HNPC03 | y=2.085 4x+1.714 6 | 0.94 | 37.62 | ||
HNPC04 | y=1.793 6x+2.272 5 | 0.93 | 33.16 | ||
溴菌腈Bromothalonil | HNPC01 | y=2.453 9x+0.121 0 | 0.96 | 97.33 | 114.33 |
HNPC02 | y=1.506 0x+2.165 4 | 0.87 | 81.43 | ||
HNPC03 | y=1.352 3x+2.099 3 | 0.98 | 152.11 | ||
HNPC04 | y=2.141 9x+0.583 1 | 0.96 | 126.48 |
Table 3 Sensitivity of 4 strains of Colletotrichum siamense from avocado to 9 fungicides
杀菌剂 Fungicide | 菌株 Strain | 回归方程 Regression equation | R² | EC50/(mg·L-1) | 平均EC50 Average EC50/(mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
吡噻菌胺Penthiopyrad | HNPC01 | y=-0.397 8x+5.890 0 | 0.89 | 2.24 | 2.86 |
HNPC02 | y=-0.526 6x+6.434 5 | 0.96 | 2.72 | ||
HNPC03 | y=-0.488 8x+6.522 4 | 0.95 | 3.12 | ||
HNPC04 | y=-0.494 3x+6.669 0 | 0.98 | 3.38 | ||
多菌灵Carbendazim | HNPC01 | y=0.413 6x+3.206 9 | 0.98 | 4.34 | 4.29 |
HNPC02 | y=0.421 0x+3.202 8 | 0.97 | 4.27 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.411 0x+3.263 6 | 0.96 | 4.22 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.408 7x+3.227 6 | 0.95 | 4.34 | ||
嘧菌酯Azoxystrobin | HNPC01 | y=0.286 8x+4.903 4 | 0.98 | 2.17 | 2.09 |
HNPC02 | y=0.267 0x+4.949 2 | 0.97 | 1.55 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.303 2x+4.845 6 | 0.99 | 3.23 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.267 1x+4.958 7 | 0.99 | 1.43 | ||
吡唑醚菌酯Pyraclostrobin | HNPC01 | y=0.212 5x+4.396 2 | 0.88 | 2.84 | 2.71 |
HNPC02 | y=0.263 9x+4.370 8 | 0.91 | 2.38 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.163 0x+4.453 7 | 0.93 | 3.35 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.246 7x+4.440 9 | 0.95 | 2.27 | ||
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | HNPC01 | y=0.937 0x+6.002 6 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
HNPC02 | y=1.446 9x+6.323 1 | 0.96 | 0.12 | ||
HNPC03 | y=1.040 4x+6.010 7 | 0.90 | 0.11 | ||
HNPC04 | y=1.289 1x+6.153 5 | 0.93 | 0.13 | ||
苯醚甲环唑Difenoconazole | HNPC01 | y=0.350 0x+4.167 0 | 0.97 | 2.38 | 2.63 |
HNPC02 | y=0.425 5x+3.865 7 | 0.95 | 2.67 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.335 7x+4.099 5 | 0.97 | 2.68 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.381 8x+3.940 1 | 0.98 | 2.78 | ||
咯菌腈Fludioxonil | HNPC01 | y=0.619 2x+3.992 7 | 0.96 | 42.35 | 60.19 |
HNPC02 | y=0.593 6x+3.949 1 | 0.94 | 58.94 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.636 0x+3.822 2 | 0.98 | 71.12 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.614 3x+3.872 9 | 0.97 | 68.36 | ||
百菌清Chlorothalonil | HNPC01 | y=2.218 1x+1.697 5 | 0.97 | 30.82 | 31.03 |
HNPC02 | y=2.071 3x+2.198 7 | 0.94 | 22.51 | ||
HNPC03 | y=2.085 4x+1.714 6 | 0.94 | 37.62 | ||
HNPC04 | y=1.793 6x+2.272 5 | 0.93 | 33.16 | ||
溴菌腈Bromothalonil | HNPC01 | y=2.453 9x+0.121 0 | 0.96 | 97.33 | 114.33 |
HNPC02 | y=1.506 0x+2.165 4 | 0.87 | 81.43 | ||
HNPC03 | y=1.352 3x+2.099 3 | 0.98 | 152.11 | ||
HNPC04 | y=2.141 9x+0.583 1 | 0.96 | 126.48 |
1 | PEDRESCHI R, VIRGILIO U, CLAUDIA F, et al.. Primary metabolism in avocado fruit [J/OL]. Front. Plant Sci., 2019, 10:795 [2023-08-10]. . |
2 | 付小猛,毛加梅,董美超,等.世界及中国鳄梨产销概况与展望[J].中国果树,2019(6):109-113. |
3 | 禾本.全球:2030年鳄梨产销预测[J].中国果业信息,2021,38(8):36-37. |
4 | 张良,张德生,刘康德.海南省油梨产业发展的环境分析与对策[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2015,36(4):78-84. |
ZHANG L, ZHANG D S, LIU K D. Environment analysis and policy for development of avocado industry Hainan [J]. Chin. J. Agric. Res. Reg. Plan., 2015, 36(4):78-84. | |
5 | 奎国秀,祁春节,李冬梅,等.全球牛油果产业发展态势及对我国牛油果产业发展的思考[J].中国果树,2023(1):122-127. |
6 | BUSTAMANTE M I, CLAUDIO O N, YSADORA F, et al.. First record of Colletotrichum anthrisci causing anthracnose on avocado fruits in Chile [J/OL]. Pathogens, 2022, 11(10):1204 [2023-08-10]. . |
7 | GIBLIN F R, TAN Y P, MITCHELL R, et al.. Colletotrichum species associated with pre- and post-harvest diseases of avocado and mango in eastern Australia [J]. Aust. Plant Path., 2018, 47(3):269-276. |
8 | KIMARU S K, MONDA E, CHERUIYOT R C, et al.. Morphological and molecular identification of the causal agent of anthracnose disease of avocado in Kenya [J]. Int. J. Microbiol., 2018(4):1-10. |
9 | KWON J H, CHOI O, LEE Y, et al.. Anthracnose on postharvest avocado caused by Colletotrichum kahawae subsp. ciggaro in South Korea [J]. Can. J. Plant Pathol., 2020, 42(4):508-513. |
10 | WANJIKU E K, WACEKE J W, WANJALA B W, et al.. Identification and pathogenicity of fungal pathogens associated with stem end rots of avocado fruits in Kenya [J/OL]. Int. J. Microbiol., 2020:4063697 [2023-08-10]. . |
11 | DAMM U, SATO T, ALIZADEH A, et al.. The Colletotrichum dracaenophilum, C. magnum and C. orchidearum species complexes [J]. Studys Mycol., 2019, 92(5):1-46. |
12 | TALHINHAS P, MOTA-CAPITAO C, MARTINS S, et al.. Epidemiology, histopathology and aetiology of olive anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides in Portugal [J]. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60(3):483-495. |
13 | 景春华.油梨果实贮藏及加工工艺研究进展[J].果树资源学报,2020,1(3):61-64. |
JING C H. Research progress on storage and processing technique of avocado [J]. J. Fruit Res., 2020,1(3):61-64. | |
14 | 李敏,胡美姣,高兆银,等.鳄梨果实病害及防治方法[J].中国南方果树,2009,38(5):71-73. |
15 | MARIN-FELIX Y, GROENEWALD J Z, CAI L, et al.. Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1 [J]. Stu. Mycol., 2017,86:99-216. |
16 | 江涛,刘先宝,李博勋,等.国内橡胶树尖孢炭疽复合种种间分子系统发育及生物学特性分析[J].热带作物学报, 2020,41(9):1856-1864. |
JIANG T, LIU X B, LI B X, et al.. Interspecific molecular phylogeny and biological characteristics of Colletotrichum acutatum complex species causing Colletotrichum leaf disease on rubber trees in China [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2020, 41(9):1856-1864. | |
17 | TALHINHAS P, BARONCELLI R. Colletotrichum species and complexes: geographic distribution, host range and conservation status [J]. Fungal Divers., 2021, 110: 109-198. |
18 | JAYAWARDENA R S, BHUNJUN C S, HYDE K D, et al.. Colletotrichum: lifestyles, biology, morpho-species, species complexes and accepted species [J]. Mycosphere, 2021, 12:519-699. |
19 | FUENTES-ARAGON D, SILVA-ROJAS H V, GUARNACCIA V, et al.. Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose on avocado fruit in Mexico: current status [J]. Plant Pathol., 2021, 69(8):1513-1528. |
20 | SHARMA G, MAYMON M and FREEMAN S. Epidemiology, pathology and identification of Colletotrichum including a novel species associated with avocado (Persea americana) anthracnose in Israel [J]. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7(1):1-16. |
21 | DAMM U, CANNON P F, WOUDENBERG J H C, et al.. The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex [J]. Studys Mycol., 2012, 73(1):37-113. |
22 | LIU F, CAI L, CROUS P W, et al.. The Colletotrichum gigasporum species complex [J]. Persoonia-Biol. Environ. Sci., 2014, 33(1):83-97. |
23 | LI M, FENG W L, YANG J Y, et al.. First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum siamense on avocado fruits in China [J/OL]. Crop Prot., 2022, 155:105922 [2023-08-10]. . |
24 | 范真真,卢艳春,王文林,等.广西崇左油梨叶部炭疽病病原菌分离与鉴定[J].植物病理学报,2023,53(3):527-530. |
FAN Z Z, LU Y C, WANG W L, et al.. Identification of pathogen species of avocado leaf anthracnose in Chongzuo, Guangxi [J]. Acta Phytopathol. Sin., 2023, 53(3):527-530. | |
25 | 李晶,仇芳,张超,等.海南白沙和儋州油梨叶部及果实炭疽病菌的鉴定[J].果树学报,2023,40(7):1443-1454. |
LI J, QIU F, ZHANG C, et al.. Identification of pathogen species of avocado leaf and fruits anthracnose in Baisha and Danzhou, Hainan [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2023,40(7):1443-1454. | |
26 | SHIVAS R G, TAN Y P, EDWARDS J, et al.. Colletotrichum species in Australia [J]. Aust. Plant Pathol., 2016, 45:447-464. |
27 | SOARES M G O, ALVES E, SILVEIRA A L, et al.. Colletotrichum siamense is the main aetiological agent of anthracnose of avocado in south-eastern Brazil [J]. Plant Pathol., 2021, 70(1):154-166. |
28 | ECKERT J W. Recent developments in the chemical control of postharvest diseases [J]. Acta Hortic., 1990, 269:477-494. |
29 | SCHEEPERS S, JOOSTE A, ALEMU Z G. Quantifying the impact of phytosanitry standards with specific reference to MRLs on the trade flow of South African avocados to the EU [J]. Agrekon, 2007, 46(2):260-273. |
30 | EVERETT K R, PAK H A, PUSHARAJAH I P S, et al. Field evaluation of fungicides to control postharvest rots of avocados in New Zealand [J]. New Zealand Plant Prot., 2011, 64:112-118. |
31 | SMITH L A, DANN B E K, LEONARDI J, et al.. Exploring on traditional products for management of postharvest anthracnose and stem end rot in avocado [C]// Proceedings of V11 World Avocado Congress Home page, 2011. |
32 | 韦文添.不同杀菌剂对油梨炭疽病菌的抑菌效果[J].贵州农业科学,2014,42(5):125-127. |
WEI W T. Antibacterial effect of different fungicides on avocado anthracnose [J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2014, 42(5):125-127. |
[1] | Shifeng MU, Xiaolei WEN, Lina FENG, Dexuan ZHAO, Suhong GAO, Peng GAO, Huixia QI. Identification and Biological Characteristics of a Colletotrichum fructicola Causing Chestnut Internal Rot Disease [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 122-128. |
[2] | Xiaofei XIONG, Xiuqin WANG, Cuizhen ZHUANG, Jiaxian GUO, Xinrui XIE, Jianwei WU, Qifeng LI. Research on Diagnostic Method of Citrus Anthracnose Based on Image ROI Fusion Feature [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 83-92. |
[3] | Mengting JI, Changjiang CHEN, Liuhe LUO, Zhijian LIN, Menglin ZHAN, Bingye YANG, Fangping HU, Xueqing CAI. Pathogen Identification of Kiwi Bacterial Wilt in Fujian [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 144-152. |
[4] | Pengsheng LI, Qingtai HUANG, Yongmei FAN, Meng WANG, Ye YANG. Identification of Pathogen Causing Bacterial Fruit Blotch of Melon in Hainan [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 117-123. |
[5] | Chunping HE, Lanyan FAN, He WU, Yanqiong LIANG, Weihuai WU, Rui LI, Fucong ZHENG. Study on Inhibitory Effect of Lipopeptides Produced by Bacillus subtilis Czk1 on Anthracnose and Powdery Mildewof Rubber Tree [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 126-134. |
[6] | Yuping SHI, Yixian LIU, Guowei LI, Yi TANG, Liming DAI, Lanlan LI, Zhiying CAI. Isolation and Identification of Pathogen of Rubber Tree Phytophthora Leaf Fall Disease and Screening of Control Fungicides [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(11): 114-122. |
[7] | Keze YANG, Fang WU, Yujie WEI, Liangfang WANG, Hao CHANG, Zhitao WU, Xianzhong YANG. Pathogen Identification and Laboratory Drug Screening of Peony Root Rot in Cold and Cool Region of Hexi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 144-151. |
[8] | Jiahuan HUO, Xiaolei WEN, Shuangmin LI, Lina FENG, Shuhui LAN, Lixin DONG, Sirou GUO, Jianing LI, Jianhua WANG, Huixia QI. Identification and Biological Characteristics of the Pathogen Causing Root Rot of Atractylodes chinensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 137-144. |
[9] | ZHANG Nana§, LI Shuangmin§, WEN Xiaolei, FENG Lina, WANG Junfeng, YANG Wenjie, HUO Jiahuan, LAN Shuhui, SUN Weiming, QI Huixia. Identification and Biological Characteristics of the Pathogen Causing Pink Disease of Chestnut [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 145-152. |
[10] | LUO Lina1, HAN Shuquan1*, WANG Daigu1, LI Maofu2, MA Weihong3, ZHANG Zhengxue1, LIU Xiaocui1. Analysis and Evaluation of the Differences in Fruit Quality of Avocado [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 105-113. |
[11] | WEN Xiaolei1,2, QI Huixia1*, SUN Weiming1, LIU Yijian1, FENG Lina1, MENG Tongyao2, HAN Zhiling1, CAO Jia1, WANG Junfeng1. Identification and Biological Characteristics of the Pathogen (Fusarium equiseti) Causing Shoot Blight of Atractylodes chinensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(5): 115-121. |
[12] | WANG Wei, LI Yong, WANG Wei, BIAN Xue, LI Xiying*. Anti-disease Effect and Mechanism of Y-S-Y12 Strain Fermentation Mixed with Biomass Pyrolysis Solution on Pepper Anthracnose [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(10): 129-138. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||