中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 217-228.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0013
• 生物制造 资源生态 • 上一篇
张曦瑜1(), 沈幸1,2, 李伟1, 谢文歌1, 李杰1, 杨昌浩1, 柴仲平1,2(
)
收稿日期:
2024-01-07
接受日期:
2024-02-26
出版日期:
2025-07-15
发布日期:
2025-07-11
通讯作者:
柴仲平
作者简介:
张曦瑜 E-mail: 943785064@qq.com;
基金资助:
Xiyu ZHANG1(), Xing SHEN1,2, Wei LI1, Wenge XIE1, Jie LI1, Changhao YANG1, Zhongping CHAI1,2(
)
Received:
2024-01-07
Accepted:
2024-02-26
Online:
2025-07-15
Published:
2025-07-11
Contact:
Zhongping CHAI
摘要:
为探究减氮配施有机肥对库尔勒香梨园土壤(0—20 cm)细菌群落结构及多样性的影响,以常规施肥处理为对照(CK),设置分别较常规施肥用氮量减少10 %(N1)、20 %(N2)、30 %(N3)3个氮肥减量梯度和2个有机肥梯度,即分别施用羊粪22 500(F1)、33 750 kg·hm-2(F2),组合形成氮肥减量配施有机肥试验处理。采用高通量测序技术测定土壤细菌群落结构组成及群落多样性,分析其与土壤理化性质的关系。结果表明,土壤细菌优势菌门为放线菌门(Actinobacteria)、变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)、芽单胞菌门(Gemmatimonadetes)、绿弯菌门(Chloroflexi)、酸杆菌门(Acidobacteria)和拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes);优势细菌属为芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus)、考克氏菌属(Kocuria)、嗜盐单胞菌属(Halomonas)、Subgroup_6、S0134_terrestrial_group、节杆菌属(Arthrobacter)和动孢菌属(Kineosporia)。N1F2处理能增加拟杆菌门的相对丰度,N1F2和N2F2处理对考克氏菌属的相对丰度有促进作用,N2F2处理对节杆菌属的相对丰度有促进作用。N3F2处理对细菌群落的α多样性有显著促进作用。减氮配施有机肥对土壤有机质、全氮、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾显著促进,对pH、电导率显著抑制,全氮、土壤有机质、碱解氮、速效钾、有效磷、电导率、pH是影响土壤细菌群落结构的重要环境因素。为推进香梨园土壤质量提升及土壤生态系统多样性的稳定,推荐10~12年树龄的库尔勒香梨适宜施肥模式为施氮240~270 kg·hm-2的同时配施有机肥33 750 kg·hm-2。
中图分类号:
张曦瑜, 沈幸, 李伟, 谢文歌, 李杰, 杨昌浩, 柴仲平. 氮肥减量配施有机肥对库尔勒香梨园土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 217-228.
Xiyu ZHANG, Xing SHEN, Wei LI, Wenge XIE, Jie LI, Changhao YANG, Zhongping CHAI. Influence of Reduced Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Korla Pear Orchards[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(7): 217-228.
处理Treatment | 养分用量Quantity of nutrient application/(kg·hm-2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | 羊粪Sheep manure | |
CK | 300 | 300 | 75 | 0 |
N1F1 | 270 | 300 | 75 | 22 500 |
N2F1 | 240 | 300 | 75 | 22 500 |
N3F1 | 210 | 300 | 75 | 22 500 |
N1F2 | 270 | 300 | 75 | 33 750 |
N2F2 | 240 | 300 | 75 | 33 750 |
N3F2 | 210 | 300 | 75 | 33 750 |
表1 氮肥减量配施有机肥试验方案
Table 1 Experiment scheme with nitrogen reduction combined with organic fertilizer
处理Treatment | 养分用量Quantity of nutrient application/(kg·hm-2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | 羊粪Sheep manure | |
CK | 300 | 300 | 75 | 0 |
N1F1 | 270 | 300 | 75 | 22 500 |
N2F1 | 240 | 300 | 75 | 22 500 |
N3F1 | 210 | 300 | 75 | 22 500 |
N1F2 | 270 | 300 | 75 | 33 750 |
N2F2 | 240 | 300 | 75 | 33 750 |
N3F2 | 210 | 300 | 75 | 33 750 |
图1 减氮配施有机肥下细菌群落门水平的相对丰度
Fig. 1 Relative abundance of bacterial communities at the phylum level under reduced nitrogen combined with organic fertilizer
图 2 减氮配施有机肥下细菌群落属水平的相对丰度
Fig. 2 Relative abundance of bacterial communities at the genus level under reduced nitrogen combined with organic fertilizer
图3 减氮配施有机肥下土壤细菌群落的α多样性注:*表示在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 3 Soil bacterial community α diversity under reduced nitrogen combined with organic fertilizerNote:* indicates significant difference at P<0.05 level.
图4 减氮配施有机肥下土壤细菌群落的β多样性注:图中每个点代表1个样本,3个相同颜色的点代表3个重复处理。
Fig. 4 Soil bacterial community β diversity under reduced nitrogen combined with organic fertilizerNote:Each dot in the figure represents one sample, 3 dots of same colour represent 3 replicate treatments.
时期Period | 处理Treatment | 全氮TN/(g·kg-1) | 有机质SOM/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮AN/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷AP/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾AK/(mg·kg-1) | pH | 电导率EC/(μs·cm-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T2 | CK | 0.87 b | 19.70 c | 66.33 e | 71.68 a | 228.00 a | 7.82 de | 3 955.33 b |
N1F1 | 0.92 ab | 21.70 a | 66.10 e | 67.21 ab | 228.00 a | 7.94 a | 2 314.00 d | |
N2F1 | 0.84 b | 21.85 a | 67.23 e | 66.99 ab | 229.33 a | 7.83 cd | 4 559.33 a | |
N3F1 | 0.84 b | 20.42 bc | 70.36 de | 63.23 b | 235.67 a | 7.91 ab | 4 558.33 a | |
N1F2 | 0.98 a | 22.12 a | 76.57 c | 66.21 ab | 231.67 a | 7.89 bcd | 3 544.67 c | |
N2F2 | 0.90 ab | 21.28 ab | 73.07 cd | 67.68 ab | 234.00 a | 7.74 e | 3 418.33 c | |
N3F2 | 0.88 b | 21.96 a | 81.83 b | 62.41 b | 241.00 a | 7.85 cde | 1 460.67 e | |
T3 | CK | 0.92 b | 20.51 b | 64.35 cd | 75.25 b | 232.67 ab | 8.11 a | 2 045.33 e |
N1F1 | 0.96 ab | 22.02 a | 66.40 bc | 70.33 bcd | 234.67 ab | 7.85 b | 3 685.33 c | |
N2F1 | 0.89 b | 22.27 a | 63.72 cd | 65.63 cd | 234.33 ab | 7.83 b | 3 779.00 c | |
N3F1 | 0.88 b | 19.91 b | 58.27 d | 61.87 d | 229.00 b | 7.80 bc | 4 428.67 b | |
N1F2 | 1.05 a | 21.84 a | 79.00 a | 72.28 bc | 244.00 a | 8.08 a | 2 798.33 d | |
N2F2 | 0.98 ab | 22.34 a | 72.45 ab | 68.52 bcd | 240.33 ab | 7.84 b | 3 892.00 c | |
N3F2 | 0.93 b | 22.94 a | 66.22 bc | 63.47 d | 240.00 ab | 7.71 c | 6 081.67 a | |
T4 | CK | 0.91 cd | 21.02 d | 62.25 de | 69.66 ab | 221.00 d | 7.94 ab | 6 187.00 b |
N1F1 | 0.98 abc | 25.06 ab | 67.12 cd | 70.07 ab | 239.00 c | 7.92 ab | 2 167.00 f | |
N2F1 | 0.92 bcd | 23.10 c | 66.05 cd | 65.10 bc | 230.00 cd | 7.81 c | 3 650.33 c | |
N3F1 | 0.89 d | 20.18 d | 57.48 e | 61.24 c | 220.67 d | 7.65 d | 7 656.33 a | |
N1F2 | 1.07 a | 25.52 a | 81.87 a | 74.60 a | 252.00 b | 7.98 a | 20 514 .00 e | |
N2F2 | 1.01 ab | 24.07 bc | 73.28 b | 69.43 ab | 240.67 bc | 7.87 bc | 1 546.67 g | |
N3F2 | 0.94 bcd | 23.79 bc | 67.70 c | 61.51 c | 242.00 bc | 7.33 e | 2 862.33 d |
表2 减氮配施有机肥下的土壤理化性质
Table 2 Soil physical and chemical properties under reduced nitrogen combined with organic fertilizer
时期Period | 处理Treatment | 全氮TN/(g·kg-1) | 有机质SOM/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮AN/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷AP/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾AK/(mg·kg-1) | pH | 电导率EC/(μs·cm-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T2 | CK | 0.87 b | 19.70 c | 66.33 e | 71.68 a | 228.00 a | 7.82 de | 3 955.33 b |
N1F1 | 0.92 ab | 21.70 a | 66.10 e | 67.21 ab | 228.00 a | 7.94 a | 2 314.00 d | |
N2F1 | 0.84 b | 21.85 a | 67.23 e | 66.99 ab | 229.33 a | 7.83 cd | 4 559.33 a | |
N3F1 | 0.84 b | 20.42 bc | 70.36 de | 63.23 b | 235.67 a | 7.91 ab | 4 558.33 a | |
N1F2 | 0.98 a | 22.12 a | 76.57 c | 66.21 ab | 231.67 a | 7.89 bcd | 3 544.67 c | |
N2F2 | 0.90 ab | 21.28 ab | 73.07 cd | 67.68 ab | 234.00 a | 7.74 e | 3 418.33 c | |
N3F2 | 0.88 b | 21.96 a | 81.83 b | 62.41 b | 241.00 a | 7.85 cde | 1 460.67 e | |
T3 | CK | 0.92 b | 20.51 b | 64.35 cd | 75.25 b | 232.67 ab | 8.11 a | 2 045.33 e |
N1F1 | 0.96 ab | 22.02 a | 66.40 bc | 70.33 bcd | 234.67 ab | 7.85 b | 3 685.33 c | |
N2F1 | 0.89 b | 22.27 a | 63.72 cd | 65.63 cd | 234.33 ab | 7.83 b | 3 779.00 c | |
N3F1 | 0.88 b | 19.91 b | 58.27 d | 61.87 d | 229.00 b | 7.80 bc | 4 428.67 b | |
N1F2 | 1.05 a | 21.84 a | 79.00 a | 72.28 bc | 244.00 a | 8.08 a | 2 798.33 d | |
N2F2 | 0.98 ab | 22.34 a | 72.45 ab | 68.52 bcd | 240.33 ab | 7.84 b | 3 892.00 c | |
N3F2 | 0.93 b | 22.94 a | 66.22 bc | 63.47 d | 240.00 ab | 7.71 c | 6 081.67 a | |
T4 | CK | 0.91 cd | 21.02 d | 62.25 de | 69.66 ab | 221.00 d | 7.94 ab | 6 187.00 b |
N1F1 | 0.98 abc | 25.06 ab | 67.12 cd | 70.07 ab | 239.00 c | 7.92 ab | 2 167.00 f | |
N2F1 | 0.92 bcd | 23.10 c | 66.05 cd | 65.10 bc | 230.00 cd | 7.81 c | 3 650.33 c | |
N3F1 | 0.89 d | 20.18 d | 57.48 e | 61.24 c | 220.67 d | 7.65 d | 7 656.33 a | |
N1F2 | 1.07 a | 25.52 a | 81.87 a | 74.60 a | 252.00 b | 7.98 a | 20 514 .00 e | |
N2F2 | 1.01 ab | 24.07 bc | 73.28 b | 69.43 ab | 240.67 bc | 7.87 bc | 1 546.67 g | |
N3F2 | 0.94 bcd | 23.79 bc | 67.70 c | 61.51 c | 242.00 bc | 7.33 e | 2 862.33 d |
图5 土壤理化性质与细菌减氮配施有机肥处理α多样性的相关关系注:*和**分别表示在P<0.05和P<0.01水平相关显著。
Fig. 5 Correlations between soil physicochemical properties and bacterial community α diversity under reduced nitrogen and organic fertilizer treatmentNote:* and ** indicate significant correlations at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels,respectively.
图6 减氮配施有机肥条件下土壤理化性质与细菌群落门水平的冗余分析注:图中每个点代表1个样本,3个颜色相同的点代表3个重复处理。
Fig. 6 RDA of soil physicochemical properties and bacterial communities at the phylum level under reduced nitrogen and organic fertilizer conditionsNote:Each dot in the figure represents 1 sample, 3 dots of same colour represent 3 replicate treatments.
图7 减氮配施有机肥条件下土壤理化性质与细菌群落门水平的相关关系注:*和**分别表示在P<0.05和P<0.01水平相关显著。
Fig. 7 Correlations between soil physicochemical properties and bacterial communities at the phylum level under reduced nitrogen and organic fertilizer conditionsNote:* and ** indicate significant correlations at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels,respectively.
图8 减氮配施有机肥条件下土壤理化性质与细菌群落属水平的冗余分析注:图中每个点代表1个样本,3个颜色相同的点代表3个重复处理。
Fig. 8 RDA of soil physicochemical properties and bacterial communities at the genus level under reduced nitrogenand organic fertilizer conditionsNote:Each dot in the figure represents 1 sample, 3 dots of same colour represent 3 replicate treatments.
图9 减氮配施有机肥条件下土壤理化性质与细菌群落属水平的相关关系注:*和**分别表示在P<0.05和P<0.01水平相关显著。
Fig. 9 Correlations between soil physicochemical properties and bacterial communities at the genus level under reduced nitrogen and organic fertilizer conditionsNote:* and ** indicate significant correlations at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels,respectively.
[1] | WU X, ZHANG T, ZHAO J N, et al.. Variation of soil bacterial and fungal communities from fluvo-aquic soil under chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic materials in North China Plain [J]. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 2021,21(1):349-363. |
[2] | 张福锁,王激清,张卫峰,等.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):915-924. |
ZHANG F S, WANG J Q, ZHANG W F, et al.. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement [J]. Acta Pedol. Sin., 2008,45(5):915-924. | |
[3] | 刘国红.芽孢杆菌的分类鉴定及其相关属的分类系统演变研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2009. |
LIU G H. Taxonomic identification of bacillus and the evolution of taxonomic system of related genera [D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2009. | |
[4] | 赵军,窦玉青,宋付朋,等.有机和无机烟草专用肥配合施用对烟草生产效益和肥料氮素利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(3):613-619. |
ZHAO J, DOU Y Q, SONG F P, et al.. Effects of combined application of biological organic fertilizer and inorganic compound fertilizer on the tobacco profit and nitrogen use efficiency [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2014,20(3):613-619. | |
[5] | 马宜林, 吴广海, 申洪涛, 等. 羊粪有机肥与化肥配施对烤烟生长及土壤肥力特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35 (10): 2423-2430. |
MA Y L, WU G H, SHEN H T, et al..Effects of combined application of sheep manure-derived organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on tobacco growth and soil fertility [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2021, 35 (10): 2423-2430. | |
[6] | 赵力光,唐兴莹,汤利,等.化肥减量配施生物有机肥对植烟土壤微生物区系的影响及其与烤烟青枯病的关系[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2018,33(4):744-750. |
ZHAO L G, TANG X Y, TANG L,et al..Effects of bio-organic fertilizers combination with chemical fertilizer reduction on the soil microbial flora and its correlation of bacterial wilt of flue-cured tobacco [J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2018,33(4):744-750. | |
[7] | KAVAMURA V N, HAYAT R, CLARK I M, et al.. Inorganic nitrogen application affects both taxonomical and predicted functional structure of wheat rhizosphere bacterial communities [J/OL]. Front. Microbiol., 2018,9:1074 [2024-01-07].. |
[8] | INSAM H, HUTCHINSON T C, REBER H H. Effects of heavy metal stress on the metabolic quotient of the soil microflora [J].Soil Biol. Biochem., 1996,28(4/5):691-694. |
[9] | 马龙,高伟,栾好安,等.基于宏基因组学方法分析施肥模式对设施菜田土壤微生物群落的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(3):403-416. |
MA L, GAO W, LUAN H A,et al..Soil microbial community characteristics in greenhouse vegetable production under different fertilization patterns based on metagenomic analysis [J].J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2021,27(3):403-416. | |
[10] | 丁阔,王雪梅,陈波浪,等.施用黑炭和羊粪对库尔勒香梨园土壤理化性质与产量的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2015,32(5):449-455. |
DING K, WANG X M, CHEN B L,et al..Influences of applying black carbon and sheep excrement on soil properties and yield of Korla fragrant pear orchard [J].J. Agric. Resour. Environ., 2015,32(5):449-455. | |
[11] | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:1-495. |
[12] | 郭翠莲,付洁,胡青,等.尖叶木樨榄天然林地不同土层土壤微生物群落差异研究[J].西北林学院学报,2023,38(6):46-53. |
GUO C L, FU J, HU Q,et al..Differences of soil microbial communities between different soil layers of Olea cuspidata natural forest land [J]. J. Northwest For. Univ.,2023,38(6):46-53. | |
[13] | 王娟娟, 朱紫娟, 钱晓晴,等. 减施化肥与不同有机肥配施对稻季土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53 (5): 983-990. |
WANG J J, ZHU Z J, QIAN X Q, et al..Effects of reducing chemical fertilizer combined with application of different organic fertilizers on soil bacterial community structure during rice season [J]. Soils, 2021, 53 (5): 983-990. | |
[14] | 叶盛嘉, 郑晨萌, 张影,等. 氮肥减量配施有机肥对豫中地区冬小麦-夏玉米轮作生产力和土壤性质的影响 [J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2022, 30 (6): 900-912. |
YE S J, ZHENG C M, ZHANG Y, et al..Effects of reduced chemical nitrogen input combined with organic fertilizer ap-plication on the productivity of winter wheat and summer maize rotation and soil properties in central Henan province [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2022, 30 (6): 900-912. | |
[15] | YANG L, WEI W, CHEN L, et al.. Spatial variations of shallow and deep soil moisture in the semi-arid Loess Plateau, China [J]. Hydrol Earth Syst. Sci., 2012,16(9):3199-3217. |
[16] | RODRIGUES J L, PELLIZARI V H, MUELLER R, et al..Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities [J]. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2013,110(3):988-993. |
[17] | XUN W B, XIONG W, HUANG T,et al..Swine manure and quicklime have different impacts on chemical properties and composition of bacterial communities of an acidic soil [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2016,100: 38-44. |
[18] | SUL W J, ASUMING-BREMPONG S, WANG Q, et al.. Tropical agricultural land management influences on soil microbial communities through its effect on soil organic carbon [J]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2013,65:33-38. |
[19] | 于冰,宋阿琳,李冬初,等.长期施用有机和无机肥对红壤微生物群落特征及功能的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2017(6):58-65. |
YU B, SONG A L, LI D C,et al.. Influences of long-term application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the structure and function of microbial com-munity in red soil [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2017(6):58-65. | |
[20] | 徐忠山,刘景辉,逯晓萍,等.施用有机肥提高黑土土壤酶活性、增加细菌数量及种类多样性[J].中国土壤与肥料,2020(4):50-55. |
XU Z S, LIU J H, LU X P, et al.. The application of organic fertilizer improves the activity of the soil enzyme,increases the number and the species variety of bacteria in black soil [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2020(4):50-55. | |
[21] | 顾美英, 唐光木, 张云舒, 等. 有机肥与生物炭对新疆盐碱沙化土壤微生物群落特征的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32 (8): 1392-1404. |
GU M Y, TANG G M, ZHANG Y S, et al.. Effects of organic fertilizers and biochar on microorganism community characteristics in saline-alkali sandy soil of Xinjiang [J]. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 2023, 32 (8): 1392-1404. | |
[22] | 徐赛, 杨延杰, 圣亚男, 等. 有机无机肥配施对日光温室番茄连作土壤微生物的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53 (4): 897-906. |
XU S, YANG Y J, SHENG Y N, et al..Effects of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil microorganisms in continuous cropping in solar greenhouse [J]. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2022, 53 (4): 897-906. | |
[23] | 张晓冰,杨星勇,杨永柱,等.芽孢杆菌促进植物生长机制研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(3):73-80. |
[24] | 赵卉鑫,马鑫,张瑞喜,等.聚丙烯酰胺和生物炭共施对土壤细菌群落、理化因子和玉米产量的影响[J].微生物学通报,2023,50(3):1136-1148. |
ZHAO H X, MA X, ZHANG R X,et al..Effects of polyacrylamide and biochar co-application on soil bacterial community,physical and chemical factors,and maize yield [J]. Microbiol. China, 2023, 50(3):1136-1148. | |
[25] | 胡媛媛,屈洁,马琨.长期施肥对旱作区农田土壤细菌群落组成和多样性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2023(7):138-148. |
HU Y Y, QU J, MA K. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil bacterial community composition and diversity in dry farming region [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2023(7):138-148. | |
[26] | 桑文,赵亚光,张凤华.化肥减量配施有机液体肥对土壤微生物群落结构多样性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2020,33(11):2584-2590. |
SANG W, ZHAO Y G, ZHANG F H.Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic liquid fertilizer on soil microbial community structure diversity [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2020,33(11):2584-2590. | |
[27] | 王兴松, 王娜, 杜宇, 等. 有机肥对玉溪植烟土壤有机质组分和微生物群落结构的影响 [J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 201-212. |
WANG X S, WANG N, DU Y, et al.. Effects of organic fertilizer on organic matter composition and microbial community structure of tobacco-growing soil in Yuxi [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2024, 26 (8): 201-212. | |
[28] | 张平究,李恋卿,潘根兴,等.长期不同施肥下太湖地区黄泥土表土微生物碳氮量及基因多样性变化[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2818-2824. |
ZHANG P J, LI L Q, PAN G X, et al.. Influence of long-term fertilizer management on topsoil microbial biomass and genetic diversity of a paddy soil from the Tai Lake Region, China [J].Acta Ecol. Sin., 2004,24(12):2818-2824. | |
[29] | 李栋宇,靳辉勇,屠乃美,等.等氮条件下有机无机配施对烤烟根际土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(11):2361-2365. |
LI D Y, JIN H Y, TU N M, et al.. Effects of combined application of organic and inorganic on metabolic functional diversity of rhizosphere soil microbial community of flue-cured tobacco under same N condition [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci.,2018,31(11):2361-2365. | |
[30] | 靳晓拓,马继勇,周彦妤,等.化肥减量配施有机肥下芒果园土壤细菌多样性及群落结构特征[J].热带作物学报,2019,40(6):1205-1212. |
JIN X T, MA J Y, ZHOU Y Y, et al.. Bacterial diversity and community structure characteristics of mango orchard soil under reduced chemical fertilizer and in-creased organic fertilizer application [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2019,40(6):1205-1212. | |
[31] | 李猛,张恩平,张淑红,等.长期不同施肥设施菜地土壤酶活性与微生物碳源利用特征比较[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(1):44-53. |
LI M, ZHANG E P, ZHANG S H, et al.. Comparison of soil enzyme activities and microbial C metabolism in installed vegetable fields under long-term different fertilization [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2017,23(1):44-53. | |
[32] | 徐万里,唐光木,葛春辉,等.长期施肥对新疆灰漠土土壤微生物群落结构与功能多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(2):468-477. |
XU W L, TANG G M, GE C H,et al..Effects of long-term fertilization on diversities of soil microbial community structure and function in grey desert soil of Xinjiang [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2015,35(2):468-477. | |
[33] | SADET-BOURGETEAU S, HOUOT S, DEQUIEDT S, et al.. Lasting effect of repeated application of organic waste products on microbial communities in arable soils [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2018, 125: 278-287. |
[1] | 周琦, 刘强, 张靖, 邓超超, 王振龙, 柳洋, 吴芳, 常浩, 周彦芳, 宿翠翠, 施志国, 高正睿, 马凤捷. 有机肥替代化肥对土壤生物学特性及南瓜产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(7): 190-203. |
[2] | 许静, 李晗, 陈平录, 罗江旎, 唐承露, 刘木华. 油茶茶枯离散元模型参数标定与试验[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 112-121. |
[3] | 李大荣, 李小玲, 周武先, 张美德, 蒋小刚, 由金文, 王华. 有机肥替代部分化肥对湖北贝母生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 216-226. |
[4] | 米春娇, 孙洪仁, 张吉萍, 吕玉才, 张砚迪. 我国番茄土壤有效磷丰缺指标和推荐施磷量初步研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 222-232. |
[5] | 王兴松, 王娜, 杜宇, 周鹏, 王戈, 贾孟, 徐照丽, 白羽祥. 有机肥对玉溪植烟土壤有机质组分和微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 201-212. |
[6] | 卢登洋, 童盼盼, 闫敏, 鲍荆凯, 刘鸣哲, 夏怡蕾, 吴翠云. 库尔勒香梨大果芽变的鉴定与评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 52-64. |
[7] | 韩秀丽, 李嘉伟, 张杰, 郭艳杰, 张丽娟, 吉艳芝. 生物有机肥替代化肥对葡萄生长与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 195-205. |
[8] | 梁永进, 朱睿璇, 韦贝蕾, 袁小迈, 成武洋, 彭博, 王梓廷, 韦建玉. 有机肥配施对我国烟叶品质影响的整合分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(12): 164-175. |
[9] | 张伟健, 冯景翊, 李悦, 何婉莹, 车延静, 王紫颖, 白雪燕, 谷思玉. 内-外源有机质对黑土磷素吸附及有效性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(11): 180-190. |
[10] | 高静娟, 朱晨宇, 柯玉琴, 郑朝元, 李春英, 李文卿. 烟稻轮作条件下有机肥施用时期对烤烟碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 157-165. |
[11] | 邵社刚, 李婷, 柳勇, 林兰稳, 张东, 倪栋, 李俊杰, 朱立安. 外源菌剂对稻秆腐解及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 166-177. |
[12] | 张晨阳, 徐明岗, 王斐, 李然, 孙楠. 施用有机肥对我国大豆产量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 148-156. |
[13] | 杜彩艳, 鲁海燕, 熊艳竹, 孙曦, 孙秀梅, 普继雄, 张乃明. 连续两年沼液与化肥配施对桃生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 165-175. |
[14] | 王艳成, 张纪月, 冯帅奇, 梁雪, 张振, 董微巍, 姬文秀. 外源促生菌联合有机肥对干旱胁迫下参地土壤性状及人参抗逆性影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 196-202. |
[15] | 肖锐, 谭璐, 吴亮, 张皓, 郭佳源, 杨海君. 镉胁迫下地肤根际与非根际土壤微生物群落结构及多样性[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 203-215. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||