中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 47-57.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0631
收稿日期:
2021-08-02
接受日期:
2021-11-13
出版日期:
2022-06-15
发布日期:
2022-06-21
通讯作者:
丁伟
作者简介:
田振祥E-mail:879981430@qq.com;
基金资助:
Zhenxiang TIAN1(), Wei DING1(
), Zhuo CHENG2, Hangyu DAI2
Received:
2021-08-02
Accepted:
2021-11-13
Online:
2022-06-15
Published:
2022-06-21
Contact:
Wei DING
摘要:
为利用内生细菌促进大豆生长发育,从而获得环境友好型生物调控剂,从大豆种子中分离得到优势内生细菌,研究其对大豆生长和生理指标的影响。把大豆种子装入无纺布袋内,在土壤中埋藏10 d后取出,种子表面消毒后在灭菌培养皿中培养,在胚根周围分离得到8株内生细菌,通过初步筛选获得2株具有促生作用的优势内生细菌KC-1和MD12-2,经鉴定分别为侧孢芽孢杆菌(Brevibacillus laterosporus)和枯草芽孢杆菌(Bacillus subtilis),具有产生长素(IAA)和溶解有机磷的能力。使用2.5×107 cfu·mL-1的KC-1和MD12-2菌液浸种,对种子萌发有着显著促进作用;盆栽试验表明,10×107、5×107 cfu·mL-1的KC-1和MD12-2菌液浸种,大豆的生长量、叶绿素含量、根系活力、硝酸还原酶活性和根瘤固氮酶活性均显著增加(P<0.05)。
中图分类号:
田振祥, 丁伟, 程茁, 戴航宇. 大豆内生细菌的分离及其作用效果研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 47-57.
Zhenxiang TIAN, Wei DING, Zhuo CHENG, Hangyu DAI. Isolation of Endophytic Bacteria in Soybean and Its Action Effect[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 47-57.
菌株 Strain | 发芽势 Germination potential/% | 发芽率 Germination percentage/% | 芽长 Bud growth/cm | 株高 Plant height/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 d | 21 d | ||||
CK | 43.33 cde | 86.67 ab | 2.47±0.24 bcd | 6.17±1.23 cd | 10.83±0.65 bc |
KC-1 | 63.33 a | 93.33 ab | 4.04±0.46 a | 9.17±0.51 a | 17.40±0.53 a |
KC-2 | 53.33 c | 90.00 ab | 3.05±0.24 b | 7.23±1.10 bc | 13.00±2.10 b |
MD12-1 | 46.67 d | 86.7 0 ab | 2.85±0.29 bc | 4.50±0.36 d | 12.17±1.31 bc |
MD12-2 | 60.00 ab | 96.67 a | 4.29±0.61 a | 10.70±1.28 a | 17.20±2.67 a |
KH-1 | 40.00 de | 93.33 ab | 2.59±0.41 bcd | 8.90±0.10 ab | 13.80±2.36 b |
DN50-1 | 40.00 de | 86.67 ab | 2.67±0.46 bcd | 6.67±0.81 c | 12.07±1.25 bc |
DN50-2 | 43.33 cde | 83.33 b | 2.39±0.28 cd | 5.93±0.71 cd | 11.13±1.06 bc |
DN50-3 | 36.67 e | 63.33 c | 2.16±0.18 d | 5.73±2.20 cd | 9.67±2.27 c |
表 1 不同内生细菌浸种后大豆萌发性状
Table 1 Effect of different endophytic bacterial dips on germination and growth of soybean
菌株 Strain | 发芽势 Germination potential/% | 发芽率 Germination percentage/% | 芽长 Bud growth/cm | 株高 Plant height/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 d | 21 d | ||||
CK | 43.33 cde | 86.67 ab | 2.47±0.24 bcd | 6.17±1.23 cd | 10.83±0.65 bc |
KC-1 | 63.33 a | 93.33 ab | 4.04±0.46 a | 9.17±0.51 a | 17.40±0.53 a |
KC-2 | 53.33 c | 90.00 ab | 3.05±0.24 b | 7.23±1.10 bc | 13.00±2.10 b |
MD12-1 | 46.67 d | 86.7 0 ab | 2.85±0.29 bc | 4.50±0.36 d | 12.17±1.31 bc |
MD12-2 | 60.00 ab | 96.67 a | 4.29±0.61 a | 10.70±1.28 a | 17.20±2.67 a |
KH-1 | 40.00 de | 93.33 ab | 2.59±0.41 bcd | 8.90±0.10 ab | 13.80±2.36 b |
DN50-1 | 40.00 de | 86.67 ab | 2.67±0.46 bcd | 6.67±0.81 c | 12.07±1.25 bc |
DN50-2 | 43.33 cde | 83.33 b | 2.39±0.28 cd | 5.93±0.71 cd | 11.13±1.06 bc |
DN50-3 | 36.67 e | 63.33 c | 2.16±0.18 d | 5.73±2.20 cd | 9.67±2.27 c |
处理 Treatment | 发芽势 Germination potential/% | 发芽率 Germination percentage/% | 种子活力 Seed vigor | α-淀粉酶活性 α-amylase activity/ (mg·g-1·min-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
KC-1(CK) | 40.00 c | 88.33 a | 1.060 1±0.56 b | 0.809 8±0.02 c |
KC-1(高) KC-1(High) | 46.67 ab | 80.00 a | 1.060 1±0.13 b | 0.935 1±0.02 b |
KC-1(中) KC-1(Medium) | 48.33 ab | 70.00 b | 1.551 9±0.87 a | 1.126 3±0.68 a |
KC-1(低) KC-1(Low) | 56.67 a | 80.00 a | 1.553 5±0.44 a | 1.186 6±0.75 a |
MD12-2(CK) | 38.33 b | 80.00 ab | 1.025 8±0.41 b | 0.727 4±0.04 c |
MD12-2(高) MD12-2(High) | 46.67 b | 83.33 ab | 1.095 1±0.29 b | 0.954 6±0.69 b |
MD12-2(中) MD12-2(Medium) | 38.33 b | 78.33 b | 1.236 5±0.06 b | 1.066 8±0.53 b |
MD12-2(低) MD12-2(Low) | 76.67 a | 93.33 a | 3.451 5±0.14 a | 1.781 2±0.14 a |
表 2 大豆内生细菌的促萌发效果
Table 2 Promoting germination of soybean endophytic bacteria
处理 Treatment | 发芽势 Germination potential/% | 发芽率 Germination percentage/% | 种子活力 Seed vigor | α-淀粉酶活性 α-amylase activity/ (mg·g-1·min-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
KC-1(CK) | 40.00 c | 88.33 a | 1.060 1±0.56 b | 0.809 8±0.02 c |
KC-1(高) KC-1(High) | 46.67 ab | 80.00 a | 1.060 1±0.13 b | 0.935 1±0.02 b |
KC-1(中) KC-1(Medium) | 48.33 ab | 70.00 b | 1.551 9±0.87 a | 1.126 3±0.68 a |
KC-1(低) KC-1(Low) | 56.67 a | 80.00 a | 1.553 5±0.44 a | 1.186 6±0.75 a |
MD12-2(CK) | 38.33 b | 80.00 ab | 1.025 8±0.41 b | 0.727 4±0.04 c |
MD12-2(高) MD12-2(High) | 46.67 b | 83.33 ab | 1.095 1±0.29 b | 0.954 6±0.69 b |
MD12-2(中) MD12-2(Medium) | 38.33 b | 78.33 b | 1.236 5±0.06 b | 1.066 8±0.53 b |
MD12-2(低) MD12-2(Low) | 76.67 a | 93.33 a | 3.451 5±0.14 a | 1.781 2±0.14 a |
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 地上部干重 Shoot dry weight/g | 地下部干重 Root dry weight/g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 Seedling stage | 初花期 First flowering stage | 结荚期 Podding stage | 苗期 Seedling stage | 初花期 First flowering stage | 结荚期 Podding stage | 苗期 Seedling stage | 初花期 First flowering stage | 结荚期 Podding stage | |
KC-1(CK) | 10.97±0.47 a | 13.27±1.01 b | 28.00±2.25 b | 1.03±0.20 a | 2.07±0.16 b | 2.88±0.13 a | 0.28±0.09 b | 1.13±0.07 ab | 1.87±0.26 a |
KC-1(高) KC-1(High) | 8.80±0.70 a | 19.93±3.15 a | 35.20±4.04 a | 1.07±0.38 a | 2.58±0.43 a | 3.25± 0.15 a | 0.40±0.01 a | 1.19±0.05 a | 2.34±0.17 a |
KC-1(中) KC-1(Medium) | 9.50±1.78 a | 17.40±5.09 ab | 34.30±5.23 ab | 1.28±0.31 a | 2.07±0.12 b | 2.99±0.23 a | 0.37±0.05 a | 1.14±0.07 ab | 2.42±0.68 a |
KC-1(低) KC-1(Low) | 10.60±2.66 a | 17.10±1.41 ab | 29.30±2.01 ab | 1.46±0.41 a | 2.50±0.26 ab | 3.00±0.25 a | 0.40±0.02 a | 1.13±0.03 ab | 2.22±0.46 a |
MD12-2(CK) | 8.90±1.06 b | 17.20±4.20 b | 28.90±1.46 b | 1.30±0.20 a | 2.23±0.35 b | 2.90±0.27 a | 0.42±0.02 a | 1.14±0.08 a | 2.12±0.32 b |
MD12-2(高) MD12-2(High) | 11.33±1.45 a | 22.17±1.08 a | 37.43±3.89 a | 1.29±0.37 a | 2.66±0.12 a | 3.29±0.23 a | 0.41±0.05 a | 1.19±0.14 a | 2.18±0.15 b |
MD12-2(中) MD12-2(Medium) | 11.17±0.76 a | 20.10±1.67 ab | 36.33±4.52 ab | 1.38±0.21 a | 2.58±0.21 a | 3.25±0.39 a | 0.43±0.04 a | 1.19±0.09 a | 2.67±0.25 a |
MD12-2(低) MD12-2(Low) | 10.90±1.06 ab | 18.37±1.35 ab | 33.80±5.71 ab | 1.49±0.30 a | 2.41±0.09 ab | 2.93±0.30 a | 0.39±0.06 a | 1.08±0.14 a | 2.25±0.13 ab |
表 3 大豆内生细菌的促生长效果
Table 3 Promoting function of soybean endophytic bacteria
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 地上部干重 Shoot dry weight/g | 地下部干重 Root dry weight/g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 Seedling stage | 初花期 First flowering stage | 结荚期 Podding stage | 苗期 Seedling stage | 初花期 First flowering stage | 结荚期 Podding stage | 苗期 Seedling stage | 初花期 First flowering stage | 结荚期 Podding stage | |
KC-1(CK) | 10.97±0.47 a | 13.27±1.01 b | 28.00±2.25 b | 1.03±0.20 a | 2.07±0.16 b | 2.88±0.13 a | 0.28±0.09 b | 1.13±0.07 ab | 1.87±0.26 a |
KC-1(高) KC-1(High) | 8.80±0.70 a | 19.93±3.15 a | 35.20±4.04 a | 1.07±0.38 a | 2.58±0.43 a | 3.25± 0.15 a | 0.40±0.01 a | 1.19±0.05 a | 2.34±0.17 a |
KC-1(中) KC-1(Medium) | 9.50±1.78 a | 17.40±5.09 ab | 34.30±5.23 ab | 1.28±0.31 a | 2.07±0.12 b | 2.99±0.23 a | 0.37±0.05 a | 1.14±0.07 ab | 2.42±0.68 a |
KC-1(低) KC-1(Low) | 10.60±2.66 a | 17.10±1.41 ab | 29.30±2.01 ab | 1.46±0.41 a | 2.50±0.26 ab | 3.00±0.25 a | 0.40±0.02 a | 1.13±0.03 ab | 2.22±0.46 a |
MD12-2(CK) | 8.90±1.06 b | 17.20±4.20 b | 28.90±1.46 b | 1.30±0.20 a | 2.23±0.35 b | 2.90±0.27 a | 0.42±0.02 a | 1.14±0.08 a | 2.12±0.32 b |
MD12-2(高) MD12-2(High) | 11.33±1.45 a | 22.17±1.08 a | 37.43±3.89 a | 1.29±0.37 a | 2.66±0.12 a | 3.29±0.23 a | 0.41±0.05 a | 1.19±0.14 a | 2.18±0.15 b |
MD12-2(中) MD12-2(Medium) | 11.17±0.76 a | 20.10±1.67 ab | 36.33±4.52 ab | 1.38±0.21 a | 2.58±0.21 a | 3.25±0.39 a | 0.43±0.04 a | 1.19±0.09 a | 2.67±0.25 a |
MD12-2(低) MD12-2(Low) | 10.90±1.06 ab | 18.37±1.35 ab | 33.80±5.71 ab | 1.49±0.30 a | 2.41±0.09 ab | 2.93±0.30 a | 0.39±0.06 a | 1.08±0.14 a | 2.25±0.13 ab |
图5 内生细菌对大豆叶绿素含量的影响注:同时期内不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。
Fig. 5 Effect of endophytic bacteria on chlorophyll content of soybeanNote:Different lowercase letters in the same period indicate significant differences between treatments (P<0.05).
图6 内生细菌对大豆硝酸还原酶的影响注:同时期内不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。
Fig. 6 Effect of endophytic bacteria on nitrate reductase activity of soybeanNote:Different lowercase letters in the same period indicate significant differences between treatments (P<0.05).
图7 内生细菌对根系活力的影响注:同时期内不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。
Fig.7 Effect of endophytic bacteria on root activity of soybeanNote:Different lowercase letters in the same period indicate significant differences between treatments (P<0.05).
图8 内生细菌对根瘤固氮酶的影响注:同时期不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。
Fig. 8 Effect of endophytic bacteria on nitrogenase activity in root nodulesNote:Different lowercase letters in the same period indicate significant differences between treatments (P<0.05).
1 | PEIX A, RAMÍREZ-BAHENA M H, VELÁZQUEZ E, et al.. Bacterial associations with legumes [J]. Critical Rev. Plant Sci., 2015,34(1-3):17-42. |
2 | 王莉衡.植物内生菌的研究进展[J].化学与生物工程,2011,28(3):10-12, 23. |
WANG L H. Research advance on plant endophyte [J]. Chem. Bioeng., 2011,28(3):10-12, 23. | |
3 | 郭宾会,宋丽.大豆中内生菌的研究及意义[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2019,40(6):105-110. |
GUO B H, SONG L. Studies and biological significances of soybean endophytes [J]. J. Yangzhou Univ.(Agric. Life Sci.), 2019,40(6):105-110. | |
4 | HUNG P Q, KUMAR S M, GOVINDSAMY V, et al.. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from wild and cultivated soybean varieties [J]. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 2007,44(1):155-162. |
5 | SENTHILKUMAR M, SWARNALAKSHMI K, GOVINDASAMY V, et al.. Biocontrol potential of soybean bacterial endophytes against charcoal rot fungus, rhizoctonia bataticola [J]. Curr. Microbiol., 2009,58(4):288-293. |
6 | YU J, YU Z H, FAN G Q, et al.. Isolation and characterization of indole acetic acid producing root endophytic bacteria and their potential for promoting crop growth [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2016,18(5):1381-1391. |
7 | 衡楠楠,陈远学,徐开未,等.大豆根瘤菌SCAUs8的接种效果、促生性及系统发育研究[J].微生物学通报,2016,43(8):1708-1714. |
HENG N N, CHEN Y X, XU K W, et al.. Field assessment of symbiotic efficiency, growth-promoting ability and phylogeny of soybean rhizobial strain SCAUs8 [J]. Microbiol. China, 2016,43(8):1708-1714. | |
8 | 王玉霞,张淑梅,赵晓宇,等.大豆内生细菌的筛选和鉴定[J].大豆科技,2009(4):50-51. |
WANG Y X, ZHANG S M, ZHAO X Y, et al.. Screening and identification of soybean endophytic bacteria [J]. Soybean Sci. Technol.,2009(4):50-51. | |
9 | 龙锡,严希,洪佳丽,等.植物种子内生菌的研究进展[J].浙江农业科学,2016,57(8):1319-1324. |
10 | 许明双,生吉萍,郭顺堂,等.水稻内生菌K12G2菌株的鉴定及其促生特性研究[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(9):66-70. |
XU M S, SHENG J P, GUO S T, et al.. Identification of rice endophytic strain K12G2 and research on plant growth promoting traits [J]. China Agric. Sci. Bull., 2014,30(9):66-70. | |
11 | 张凯晔,刘晓琳,董小燕,等.田菁种子内生菌的分离及其对萌发的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(6):40-48. |
ZHANG K Y, LIU X L, DONG X Y, et al.. Isolation of endophytic culturesfrom sesbania cannabina seeds and their effects on germination [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020,22(6):40-48. | |
12 | 刘国秀,沈宏.生物刺激素及其在农业中的应用[J].磷肥与复肥,2020,35(11):22-26. |
LIU G X, SHEN H. Biostimulants and their application in agriculture [J]. Phosphate Compound Fert., 2020,35(11):22-26. | |
13 | VASSEUR-CORONADO M, BOULOIS H, PERTOT I, et al.. Selection of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria sharing suitable features to be commercially developed as biostimulant products [J/OL]. Microbiol. Res., 2020,245(4):126672 [2021-12-08]. . |
14 | FERCHICHI N, TOUKABRI W, BOULARESS M, et al.. Isolation, identification and plant growth promotion ability of endophytic bacteria associated with lupine root nodule grown in Tunisian soil [J]. Arch. Microbiol., 2019, 201(10):1333-1349. |
15 | 张淑梅, 沙长青, 王玉霞,等. 大豆内生细菌的分离及根腐病拮抗菌的筛选鉴定[J]. 微生物学通报, 2008, 35(10):1593-1599. |
ZHANG S M, SHA C Q, WANG Y X, et al.. Isolation and characterization of antifungal endophytic bacteria from soybean [J]. Microbiol. China, 2008,35(10):1593-1599. | |
16 | SENTHILKUMAR M, SWARNALAKSHMI K, GOVINDASAMY V, et al.. Biocontrol potential of soybean bacterial endophytes against charcoal rot fungus, rhizoctonia bataticola [J]. Curr. Microbiol., 2009, 58(4):288-293. |
17 | 武云鹏,史凤玉, Imran HAMID M.,等.野生大豆抗感大豆孢囊线虫材料内生细菌多样性分析[J]. 微生物学报,2014,54(8):926-935. |
WU Y P, SHI F Y, HAMID M I, et al.. Endophytic bacterial diversity of wild soybean(Glycine soja) varieties with different resistance to soybean cyst nematode(Heterodera glycines) [J]. Acta Microbiol. Sin., 2014,54(8):926-935. | |
18 | 李南南,黎妮,曹艳花,等.3个杂交水稻亲本成熟期种子内生细菌多样性研究[J].食品科学技术学报,2017,35(4):56-64. |
LI N N, LI N, CAO Y H, et al.. Diversity of endophytic bacterial communities in three parental seeds of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) at maturity stage [J]. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2017,35(4):56-64. | |
19 | 覃丽金.高效解磷细菌筛选及接种盆栽柱花草的效益研究[D].广州:华南热带农业大学,2006. |
QIN L J. Effects of screened phosphurbacteria on the growth of potted stylo plants and soil acidification minimization [D]. Guangzhou:South China University of Tropical Agriculture, 2006. | |
20 | 秦彬,张明聪,何松榆,等.褪黑素浸种对大豆种子萌发过程中干旱胁迫的缓解效应[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(2):192-198. |
QIN B, ZHANG M C, HE S Y, et al.. Alleviating effect of melatonin soaking on drought stress during soybean seed germination [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Area., 2020,38(2):192-198. | |
21 | RUI L, LU Y, WU T, et al.. Simultaneous isolation and purification of mollugin and two anthraquinones from rubia cordifolia by HSCCC [J]. Chromatographia, 2008,68(s1-2):95-99. |
22 | 张宪政,谭桂茹,黄元极,等.植物生理学实验技术[M].沈阳:科学技术出版社,1989:77-82. |
23 | 张志良.植物生理学试验指导[M].第三版.北京:高等教育出版社,2004:123-124. |
24 | ZABLOTOWICZ R M, REDDY K N. Impact of glyphosate on the bradyrhizobium japonicum symbiosis with glyphosate-resistant transgenic soybean: a minireview. [J]. J. Environ. Qual., 2004,33(3):825-831. |
25 | DING W, REDDY K N, ZABLOTOWICZ R M,et al.. Physiological responses of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-sensitive soybean to aminomethylphosphonic acid,a metabolite of glyphosate [J]. Chemosphere, 2011,83(4):593-598. |
26 | 刘驰,李家宝,芮俊鹏,等.16S rRNA基因在微生物生态学中的应用[J].生态学报,2015,35(9):2769-2788. |
LIU C, LI J B, RUI J P, et al.. The applications of the 16S rRNA gene in microbial ecology: current situation and problems [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2015,35(9):2769-2788. | |
27 | 宫安东,孔宪巍,翟新可,等.枯草芽胞杆菌WY8-7的溶磷、抑菌及促生长作用[J].南京农业大学学报,2019,42(4):697-705. |
GONG A D, KONG X W, ZHAI X K, et al.. Phosphate solubilizing, antagonistic and plant growth promoting activity of Bacillus subtilis WY8-7 [J]. J. Nanjing Agric.Univ., 2019,42(4):697-705. | |
28 | 周怡,毛亮,张婷婷,等.大豆内生芽孢杆菌的分离和促生菌株的筛选及鉴定[J].大豆科学,2009,28(3):502-506. |
ZHOU Y, MAO L, ZHANG T T, et al.. Isolation of endophytic bacillus from soybean seed and screening and identification of promoting strain [J]. Soybean Sci., 2009,28(3):502-506. | |
29 | KHAN A L, HAMAYUN M, AHMAD N, et al.. Salinity stress resistance offered by endophytic fungal interaction between penicillium minioluteum LHL09 and glycine max. L [J]. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2011,21(9):893-902. |
[1] | 陈奎元, 刘卉, 丁伟. 草甘膦对大豆田土壤养分及其功能酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 180-188. |
[2] | 秦宁, 李俊茹, 田蕊, 邵振启, 李喜焕, 张彩英. 大豆籽粒生育酚遗传位点发掘及候选基因筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 48-56. |
[3] | 邢馨竹, 杨占武, 孔佑宾, 李文龙, 杜汇, 李喜焕, 张彩英. 大豆类胡萝卜素裂解双加氧酶GmCCD8固氮功能解析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(1): 46-53. |
[4] | 范文华, 戴建军, 张树山, 孙玲伟, 吴彩凤, 张德福. 大豆卵磷脂稀释液中添加原花青素对山羊冻精效果的影响#br#[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 78-86. |
[5] | 陈士亮, 孙亚倩, 邵振启, 李文龙, 孔佑宾, 杜汇, 李喜焕, 张彩英. 大豆鲜荚籽粒上位性QTL及其互作效应分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(8): 25-36. |
[6] | 周茂超1,2,黄艳娜2,段赛菲1,2,束仕元1,2,唐雪明2*. 微生物种衣剂的研制及其对玉米苗期生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4): 110-118. |
[7] | 刘璐1,名晓东1,张晓艳2,郝俊杰2,付丽平1,王乾坤1,吕鑫1,陈旺1,刘全兰1*. 高通量测序分析蚕豆种子内生细菌的多样性[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 73-80. |
[8] | 张永芳,高志慧,史鹏清,韩志平*. 基于不同大豆品种农艺性状及品质性状的适应性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(8): 25-32. |
[9] | 李智,王宏富*,王钰云,杨净,鱼冰星,黄珊珊. 谷子大豆间作对作物光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(6): 168-175. |
[10] | 金林雪1,唐红艳1*,武荣盛1,王惠贞1,刘林春2. 内蒙古大豆干旱灾害风险分析与区划[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(1): 106-115. |
[11] | 白玉哲1,马钰聪1,孟一泽1,廉瑞娇1,王莹1,李喜焕1*,张彩英2*. 大豆籽粒蛋白与脂肪含量上位性QTLs分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(6): 36-42. |
[12] | 张丽梅,马欣,韩宝吉,石磊*. 大豆-油菜轮作中不同硼肥及后效对作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(10): 133-139. |
[13] | 曹慧方,李新新,张玥琦,石鹏君,柏映国*,姚斌*. 来源于脂环酸芽孢杆菌的GH1家族β-葡萄糖苷酶的葡萄糖耐受性分子改造[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(5): 26-33. |
[14] | 耿金剑,王春艳*,程婉莹,杨雪玲,李茂松. 极早熟区大豆冠层受光量及其对产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(5): 111-123. |
[15] | 孟强1§,姜奇彦2§,牛风娟2,孙现军2,胡正2,张辉2*. 盐胁迫下不同抗性野生大豆(Glycine soja) 生理生化性状比较分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(8): 25-32. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||