Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 201-207.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0968
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Shijiang ZHU1,2(), Hu LI1, Wen XU1,2, Yating FENG1
Received:
2021-11-14
Accepted:
2022-01-21
Online:
2023-06-01
Published:
2023-07-28
作者简介:
朱士江 E-mail: 46212465@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Shijiang ZHU, Hu LI, Wen XU, Yating FENG. Effects of Soil Moisture Content on Fruit Quality in Citrus Orchards Within Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 201-207.
朱士江, 李虎, 徐文, 冯雅婷. 三峡库区土壤含水量对柑橘园果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 201-207.
处理 Treatment | 萌芽开花期 Budding and flowering stage | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 果实膨大期 Fruit-development stage | 转色增糖期 Color conversion stage | 休眠期 Dormant stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 20~25 | 23~26 | 23~26 | 23~26 | 未控制No control |
T2 | 20~25 | 20~23 | 20~23 | 20~23 | 未控制No control |
T3 | 20~25 | 17~20 | 17~20 | 17~20 | 未控制No control |
Table 1 Soil moisture content index of citrus under different irrigation modes
处理 Treatment | 萌芽开花期 Budding and flowering stage | 幼果期 Young fruit stage | 果实膨大期 Fruit-development stage | 转色增糖期 Color conversion stage | 休眠期 Dormant stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 20~25 | 23~26 | 23~26 | 23~26 | 未控制No control |
T2 | 20~25 | 20~23 | 20~23 | 20~23 | 未控制No control |
T3 | 20~25 | 17~20 | 17~20 | 17~20 | 未控制No control |
处理Treatment | 全果质量 Whole fruit weight/g | 果肉质量 Fruit weight/g | 果汁质量 Juice weight/g | 可食率 Edible rate/% | 果汁率 Fruit juice percentage/% | 果形指数 Shape index of fruit | 可溶性固形物 Dissolved solid/% | 总糖 Sugar/ (g·100 mL-1) | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid/ (g·L-1) | 维生素C Vc / (mg ·100 mL-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 868.03±64.24 a | 680.59± 65.93 a | 560.59± 29.20 a | 78.80± 5.30 a | 64.66± 5.64 b | 0.84± 0.04 a | 8.79± 0.78 b | 5.53± 0.28 c | 8.53± 0.53 a | 27.70± 2.47 b |
T2 | 602.52±53.85 b | 475.40±30.86 b | 391.98±22.28 b | 78.83± 6.27 a | 65.19± 3.77 b | 0.81± 0.06 ab | 10.00± 0.81 a | 6.15± 0.36 b | 8.74± 0.48 a | 28.07± 2.25 a |
T3 | 513.34±41.33 b | 405.41±38.28 b | 352.53±23.73 b | 79.43± 5.82 a | 68.81± 6.50 a | 0.77± 0.06 b | 9.07± 0.49 ab | 6.70± 0.62 a | 6.81± 0.53 c | 24.62± 1.65 c |
Table 2 Citrus quality in different treatments
处理Treatment | 全果质量 Whole fruit weight/g | 果肉质量 Fruit weight/g | 果汁质量 Juice weight/g | 可食率 Edible rate/% | 果汁率 Fruit juice percentage/% | 果形指数 Shape index of fruit | 可溶性固形物 Dissolved solid/% | 总糖 Sugar/ (g·100 mL-1) | 可滴定酸 Titratable acid/ (g·L-1) | 维生素C Vc / (mg ·100 mL-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 868.03±64.24 a | 680.59± 65.93 a | 560.59± 29.20 a | 78.80± 5.30 a | 64.66± 5.64 b | 0.84± 0.04 a | 8.79± 0.78 b | 5.53± 0.28 c | 8.53± 0.53 a | 27.70± 2.47 b |
T2 | 602.52±53.85 b | 475.40±30.86 b | 391.98±22.28 b | 78.83± 6.27 a | 65.19± 3.77 b | 0.81± 0.06 ab | 10.00± 0.81 a | 6.15± 0.36 b | 8.74± 0.48 a | 28.07± 2.25 a |
T3 | 513.34±41.33 b | 405.41±38.28 b | 352.53±23.73 b | 79.43± 5.82 a | 68.81± 6.50 a | 0.77± 0.06 b | 9.07± 0.49 ab | 6.70± 0.62 a | 6.81± 0.53 c | 24.62± 1.65 c |
指标Index | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X2 | 0.995 | |||||||||||
X3 | 0.998* | 0.999* | ||||||||||
X4 | 0.933 | 0.964 | 0.955 | |||||||||
X5 | 0.935 | 0.965 | 0.956 | 1.000** | ||||||||
X6 | 0.908 | 0.945 | 0.934 | 0.998* | 0.998* | |||||||
X7 | -0.923 | -0.882 | -0.897 | -0.724 | -0.726 | -0.678 | ||||||
X8 | -0.950 | -0.915 | -0.927 | -0.774 | -0.776 | -0.732 | 0.997* | |||||
X9 | 0.999** | 0.996 | 0.998* | 0.935 | 0.936 | 0.910 | -0.921 | -0.948 | ||||
X10 | -0.135 | -0.231 | -0.199 | -0.482 | -0.479 | -0.537 | -0.256 | -0.182 | -0.140 | |||
X11 | -0.993 | -0.998* | -0.998* | -0.970 | -0.971 | -0.952 | 0.870 | 0.905 | -0.993 | 0.255 | ||
X12 | 0.860 | 0.806 | 0.825 | 0.620 | 0.622 | 0.568 | -0.990 | -0.977 | 0.857 | 0.389 | -0.792 | |
X13 | 0.861 | 0.807 | 0.826 | 0.621 | 0.623 | 0.569 | -0.990 | -0.977 | 0.858 | 0.388 | -0.792 | 0.999** |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of citrus quality
指标Index | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X2 | 0.995 | |||||||||||
X3 | 0.998* | 0.999* | ||||||||||
X4 | 0.933 | 0.964 | 0.955 | |||||||||
X5 | 0.935 | 0.965 | 0.956 | 1.000** | ||||||||
X6 | 0.908 | 0.945 | 0.934 | 0.998* | 0.998* | |||||||
X7 | -0.923 | -0.882 | -0.897 | -0.724 | -0.726 | -0.678 | ||||||
X8 | -0.950 | -0.915 | -0.927 | -0.774 | -0.776 | -0.732 | 0.997* | |||||
X9 | 0.999** | 0.996 | 0.998* | 0.935 | 0.936 | 0.910 | -0.921 | -0.948 | ||||
X10 | -0.135 | -0.231 | -0.199 | -0.482 | -0.479 | -0.537 | -0.256 | -0.182 | -0.140 | |||
X11 | -0.993 | -0.998* | -0.998* | -0.970 | -0.971 | -0.952 | 0.870 | 0.905 | -0.993 | 0.255 | ||
X12 | 0.860 | 0.806 | 0.825 | 0.620 | 0.622 | 0.568 | -0.990 | -0.977 | 0.857 | 0.389 | -0.792 | |
X13 | 0.861 | 0.807 | 0.826 | 0.621 | 0.623 | 0.569 | -0.990 | -0.977 | 0.858 | 0.388 | -0.792 | 0.999** |
处理 Treatment | 果汁质量 Juice weight | 可食率 Edible rate | 果汁率 Fruit juice percentage | 可溶性固形物Dissolved solid | 总糖 Total sugar | 可滴定酸Titratable acid | 维生素C Vc | 排序Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.549 | 0.521 | 0.443 | 0.226 | 0.407 | 0.706 | 0.645 | 2 |
T2 | 0.291 | 0.524 | 0.465 | 0.571 | 0.519 | 0.771 | 0.687 | 1 |
T3 | 0.231 | 0.587 | 0.616 | 0.306 | 0.619 | 0.168 | 0.302 | 3 |
Table 4 Comprehensive analysis of membership function of flavor quality indexes with different soil moisture content
处理 Treatment | 果汁质量 Juice weight | 可食率 Edible rate | 果汁率 Fruit juice percentage | 可溶性固形物Dissolved solid | 总糖 Total sugar | 可滴定酸Titratable acid | 维生素C Vc | 排序Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.549 | 0.521 | 0.443 | 0.226 | 0.407 | 0.706 | 0.645 | 2 |
T2 | 0.291 | 0.524 | 0.465 | 0.571 | 0.519 | 0.771 | 0.687 | 1 |
T3 | 0.231 | 0.587 | 0.616 | 0.306 | 0.619 | 0.168 | 0.302 | 3 |
处理 Treatment | 全果质量 Whole fruit weight | 果肉质量 Fruit weight | 果形指数 Shape index of fruit | 排序 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.526 | 0.526 | 0.581 | 1 |
T2 | 0.276 | 0.271 | 0.465 | 2 |
T3 | 0.191 | 0.184 | 0.312 | 3 |
Table 5 Comprehensive analysis of membership function of different soil moisture content appearance quality indicators
处理 Treatment | 全果质量 Whole fruit weight | 果肉质量 Fruit weight | 果形指数 Shape index of fruit | 排序 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.526 | 0.526 | 0.581 | 1 |
T2 | 0.276 | 0.271 | 0.465 | 2 |
T3 | 0.191 | 0.184 | 0.312 | 3 |
1 | 齐乐,祁春节.世界柑橘产业现状及发展趋势[J].农业展望,2016,12(12):46-52. |
QI L, QI C J. Status quo and development trend of world’s citrus industry [J]. Agric. Outlook, 2016, 12(12):46-52. | |
2 | 莫星煜,毛玲莉,王梓,等.国内外柑橘产业发展现状综述[J].农村实用技术,2021(2):9-10. |
3 | 沈兆敏.我国柑橘生产现状及未来前景展望[J].科学种养,2019(9):5-10. |
4 | 沈兆敏.世界柑橘产销现状及做强我国柑橘产业的建议[J].果农之友,2020(3):1-3. |
5 | 潘斌.干旱胁迫对温州蜜柑水分吸收分配及果实品质形成的影响[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2019. |
PAN B. Effects of drought stress on soil water absorption of plants and fruit quality formation of satsuma mandarin [D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2019. | |
6 | 刘思汝,石伟琦,马海洋,等.果树水肥一体化高效利用技术研究进展[J].果树学报,2019,36(3):366-384. |
LIU S R, SHI W Q, MA H Y, et al.. Research progress on integrated high-efficiency utilization technology of water and fertilizer for fruit trees [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2019, 36(3):366-384. | |
7 | GUTTIER I, MARY J. Relative sensitivity of spring wheat grain yield and quality parameters to moisture deficit [J]. Crop Sci., 2001, 41:327-335. |
8 | 张芮,成自勇,王旺田,等.水分胁迫对延后栽培葡萄果实生长的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,2015,36(6):47-54. |
ZHANG R, CHENG Z Y, WANG W T, et al.. Effect of water stress on grape fruit growth under delayed cultivation [J]. J. South China Agric. Univ., 2015, 36(6):47-54. | |
9 | 张芮,王旺田,吴玉霞,等.水分胁迫度及时期对设施延迟栽培葡萄耗水和产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):155-161. |
ZHANG R, WANG W T, WU Y X, et al.. Effect of moisture stress level and stage on evapotranspiration and yield of grape under protected and delayed cultivation [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2017, 33(1):155 -161. | |
10 | 何华,耿增超,康绍忠.调亏灌溉及其在果树栽培上的应用[J].西北林学院学报,1999,14(2):83-87. |
HE H, GENG Z C, KANG S Z. Regulated deficit irrigation and the application on fruit trees [J]. J. Northwest For. Univ., 1999,14(2):83-87. | |
11 | PANIGRAHI P, SHARMA R K, HASAN M,et al.. Deficit irrigation scheduling and yield prediction of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin (Citrus reticulate Blanco) in a semiarid region [J]. Agric. Water Manage., 2014, 140(3):48-60. |
12 | 张效星,樊毅,贾悦,等.水分亏缺对滴灌柑橘光合和产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(3):143-150. |
ZHANG X X, FAN Y, JIA Y, et al.. Effect of water deficit on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and water use efficiency in Shiranui citrus under drip irrigation [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2018, 34(3):143-150 . | |
13 | 周静,汪天,崔键,等.不同土壤田间持水量对宫川温州蜜柑产量及果实品质的影响[J].中国南方果树,2008(3):7-9. |
ZHOU J, WANG T, CUI J, et al.. Effects of different soil and field water holding capacity on the yield and fruit quality of Miyagawa Wenzhou mandarin orange [J]. J. South Chin. Fruits, 2008(3):7-9. | |
14 | 谭宏伟,周柳强,谭俊杰,等.广西优质高产柑橘水肥管理技术研究[J].南方农业学报, 2019,50(6):1290-1296. |
TAN H W, ZHOU L Q, TAN J J, et al.. Technologies of water and fertilizer management for high-quality and high-yield citrus in Guangxi [J]. J. Southern Agric. Sci., 2019, 50(6):1290-1296. | |
15 | 王德维,徐立燕,周云,等.土壤墒情自动监测与人工烘干法比测研究[J].江苏水利,2017(7):68-72. |
WANG D W, XU L Y, ZHOU Y, et al.. Study on comparing measurement of soil moisture automatic monitoring and artificial drying method [J]. Jiangsu Water Res., 2017(7):68-72. | |
16 | 毛善巧,杨锋,黄永春.高效液相色谱法测定车厘子中果糖、葡萄糖及蔗糖含量[J].中国酿造,2016,35(9):168-171. |
MAO S Q, YANG F, HUANG Y C. Determination of fructose, glucose and sucrose contents in cherry by HPLC [J]. Chin. Brewing, 2016, 35(9):168-171. | |
17 | 陈屏昭,杜红波,秦燕芬,等.果蔬品含酸量测定方法的改进及其应用[J].浙江农业科学,2013(4):451-453, 456. |
CHEN P Z, DU H B, QIN Y F, et al.. Improvement and application of acid content determination method in fruits and vegetables [J]. Zhejiang Agric. Sci., 2013(4):451-453, 456. | |
18 | 李润丰,赵希艳,高亚弟. 2,6-二氯靛酚反滴定法测定红色果蔬中还原型VC[J].营养学报,2012,34(5):507-509. |
LI R F, ZHAO X Y, GAO Y D. Determination of ascorbic acid content of fruits and vegetables with red color by | |
2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol converse titration method [J]. Acta Nutr., 2012, 34(5):507-509. | |
19 | 蔺宝军,张芮,董博,等.不同生育期干旱胁迫对温室葡萄WUE、产量及品质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2019,38(12):11-18. |
LIN B J, ZHANG R, DONG B, et al.. Effects of drought stress on wue, yield and quality of greenhouse grape at different growth stages [J]. J. Irrig. Drain., 2019, 38(12):11-18. | |
20 | 张超博,李有芳,李思静,等.土壤管理方式对伏旱期柑橘生长及土壤温度和水分的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,2019,40(3):45-52. |
ZHANG C B, LI Y F, LI S J, et al.. Effects of different soil managements on soil temperature, moisture and citrus growth during summer drought season [J]. J. South Chin. Agric. Univ., 2019, 40(3):45- 52. | |
21 | 刘磊,李争艳,雷华,等.30个猕猴桃品种(单株)主要果实品质特征的综合评价[J].果树学报,2021,38(4):530-537. |
LIU L, LI Z Y, LEI H, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of main fruit quality characteristics with 30 kiwifruit cultivars (strains) [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2021, 38(4):530-537. | |
22 | 田彦龙,马永强,王磊,等.西北不同生态区甜樱桃果实品质分析 [J].果树学报,2021,38(4):509-519. |
TIAN Y L, MA Y Q, WANG L, et al.. Quality analysis of sweet cherry fruits in different ecological areas in northwest China [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2021, 38(4):509-519. | |
23 | 刘海涛,齐红岩,刘洋,等.不同水分亏缺程度对番茄生长发育、产量和果实品质的影响 [J].沈阳农业大学学报,2006,37(3):414-418. |
LIU H T, QI H Y, LIU Y, et al.. Effects of different water deficit levels on the growth and development, yield and quality of tomato [J]. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ., 2006,37(3):414-418. | |
24 | 邹以强.调亏灌溉对酿酒葡萄生长及果实品质的影响分析[J].现代园艺,2017(6):14. |
ZOU Y Q. Analysis of the effects of regulated deficit irrigation on the growth and fruit quality of wine grapes [J]. Mod. Hortic., 2017(6):14. | |
25 | 唐晓伟,刘明池,郝静,等.调亏灌溉对番茄品质与风味组分的影响 [J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(4):970-977. |
TANG X W, LIU M C, HAO J, et al.. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on tomato quality and flavor components [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2010, 16(4):970-977. | |
26 | 刘素强. 钾素水平、塑料薄膜种类、调亏灌溉对厚皮甜瓜生长及品质的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2019. |
LIU S Q. Effects of potassium levels, different plastic film, regulated deficit irrigation on growth and fruit quality of muskmelon [D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultral University, 2019. | |
27 | 李倩,单守明,刘成敏,等.果实成熟期土壤含水量对‘北红’ 葡萄花色苷和果实品质的影响[J].中国果树,2020(2):36-39. |
LI Q, SHAN S M, LIU C M, et al.. Effects of different soil moisture content treatment during fruit maturation period on anthocyanins accumulation and berry quality of ‘Beihong’ grapevine [J]. Chin. Fruits, 2020(2):36-39. |
[1] | Zhonghua MA, Juan CHEN, Na WU, Benju MAN, Xiaogang WANG, Yongqing ZHE, Jili LIU. Effects of Salt Stress and Phosphorus Supply on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Total Biomass of Switchgrass at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 190-200. |
[2] | Xiangdong WANG, Yue SONG, Yanzhi MA. Quality Comparison and Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Zingiber officinale Rosc. Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 56-66. |
[3] | Shengwei GUO, Siwen BIAN, Jianwen DING, Xiaochen ZHANG, Xing YANG, Jin DU, Chunyang XIANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Temperature Tolerance of Waxy Maize Varieties at Germination Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 38-47. |
[4] | Xingdong MA, Yehong GUO, Meiying LI, Xiaxia YU, Yingjie XU, Wenjuan ZHU, Jie FENG. Response of Drought Stress of Lyciumruthenicum Murr. Under Different Nitrogen Applications [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 193-200. |
[5] | Yuancheng ZHOU, Yongli CAO, Zhen WANG, Zhirong JIA, Yong YAO, Aiping CHEN. Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance Indexes in Different Barley Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 86-92. |
[6] | LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia. LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia* [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 21-32. |
[7] | LIU Qianjie, CHENG Yunxia, JIA Kai, SHI Zhenyu, ZHANG Jing, WEI Shaowei, WU Hui*. Influences of Nitrogen Application on Nitrogen Metabolism Enzymes Activities, Yield and Quality of Tomato in Composite Sand Culture [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 183-191. |
[8] | YANG Mengyu1, ZHANG Qi1*, YUAN Zhenyang1, CHEN Jun1, YAN Li2. Effects of Intercropping Grass on Peach Leaf and Fruit Quality in Greenhouse of Southern Xinjiang [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 178-185. |
[9] | LIU Yu1, LIU Sa1, YANG Changhui1,2, WANG Kai 1, XIE Ni1. Three-dimensional Spatial Localization of Overlapping Citrus Based on Binocular Stereo Vision [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9): 104-112. |
[10] | CHENG Dawei, CHEN Jinyong*, GU Hong, LU Huiran, ZHANG Yang, GUO Xizhi, QI Shuai, LI Zhengyang. Research on Floral Cluster Pruning Methods of Red Globe Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 44-50. |
[11] | ZHOU Yu1,2, CHEN Mengmeng1, LIU Qing1, MA Xinchao1, GENG Yangyang1,2, YANG Ping1,2, MA Guocai3, XUAN Zhengying1,2*. Effects of Different Proportions of Yellow Sand and Slag on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Greenhouse Cucumber Plants [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 117-124. |
[12] | WANG Yi, ZHANG Mao, LIU Bo, LIU Sa, HE Yu, XU Hongbin*. Design and Experiment of Clamping Mechanism About End-effector for Citrus Harvesting Robot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 61-69. |
[13] | SHI Jianhua1§, QI Lianfen1§, WANG Dandan1, LI Yan1, ZHANG Qingyin1, GE Xizhen2, TIAN Dongliang1*. Effects of Different Control Measures on Tomato Quality, Yield and Disease Incidence in Greenhouse [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 88-95. |
[14] | SUN Guoliao, CHEN Hong*, LI Shanjun, ZHANG Yanlin, XIONG Junqiang, SHAO Xian, XIA Binyun. Effects of Packaging Materials on Storage Quality of Citrus unshiu [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 104-113. |
[15] | MA Wenyao1,2, CHENG Dawei2, HUANG Haina2, CHEN Jinyong2*, YANG Yingjun1*. Effect of Prohydrojasmon on Coloration and Quality of the ‘Jumeigui’ Grape Berry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 118-125. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||