Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 198-209.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0310
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Juanjuan GUO(), Shan WANG, Haoan LUAN, Han LI, Suping GUO, Guohui QI, Xuemei ZHANG(
)
Received:
2022-04-17
Accepted:
2022-06-08
Online:
2023-10-15
Published:
2023-10-27
Contact:
Xuemei ZHANG
郭娟娟(), 王珊, 栾好安, 李寒, 郭素萍, 齐国辉, 张雪梅(
)
通讯作者:
张雪梅
作者简介:
郭娟娟 E-mail:G15200111060@136.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Juanjuan GUO, Shan WANG, Haoan LUAN, Han LI, Suping GUO, Guohui QI, Xuemei ZHANG. Effects of Microbial Inoculum on Red Raspberry Growth, Fruit Quality and Activating Soil Phosphorus and Potassium[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 198-209.
郭娟娟, 王珊, 栾好安, 李寒, 郭素萍, 齐国辉, 张雪梅. 微生物菌剂对红树莓生长、果实品质及土壤磷钾的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(10): 198-209.
处理 Treatment | 微生物菌剂施用时期及施用量 Fertilization program/(L·hm-2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6/25 | 7/15 | 8/11 | 9/15 | 10/10 | |
CK | — | — | — | — | — |
T5 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
T4 | — | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
T3 | — | — | 200 | 200 | 200 |
T2 | — | — | — | 200 | 200 |
T1 | — | — | — | — | 200 |
Table 1 Fertilization of different treatments
处理 Treatment | 微生物菌剂施用时期及施用量 Fertilization program/(L·hm-2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6/25 | 7/15 | 8/11 | 9/15 | 10/10 | |
CK | — | — | — | — | — |
T5 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
T4 | — | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
T3 | — | — | 200 | 200 | 200 |
T2 | — | — | — | 200 | 200 |
T1 | — | — | — | — | 200 |
Fig. 2 Soluble solids content of red raspberry in different periods under microbial inoculumNote: Different lowercase letters in same date indicate significant differences among different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Fruit shape index in different periods under microbial inoculumNote: Different lowercase letters in same date indicate significant differences among different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Yield of red raspberry in full bloom under microbial inoculumNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 5 Antioxidant enzymes activities of red raspberry leaves at different periods under microbial inoculumNote: Different lowercase letters in same date indicate significant differences among different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 6 Soil pH and organic matter content of red raspberry in fruiting season under microbial inoculumNote: Different lowercase letters in same soil indicate significant differences among different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 7 Available nutrients content of red raspberry soils in fruiting season under microbial inoculumNote: Different lowercase letters in same soil indicate significa nt differences among different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/ (kg·hm-2) | 较CK Compared to CK | 微生物菌剂用量 Amount of topdressing/(L·hm-2) | 微生物菌剂投入成本/(元·hm-2) Fertilizer input cost/(yuan·hm-2) | 增产效益/(元·hm-2) Increased benefits/ (yuan·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
增产量 Increased yield/(kg·hm-2) | 增产率 Percentage/% | |||||
CK | 24 930±2.03 b | — | — | — | — | — |
T5 | 31 590±8.45 a | 6 660 | 26.71 | 5 000.25 | 16 875 | 49 725 |
T4 | 31 395±7.66 a | 6 465 | 25.93 | 4 000.20 | 13 500 | 51 150 |
T3 | 27 765±8.09 ab | 2 835 | 11.37 | 3 000.15 | 10 125 | 18 225 |
T2 | 26 055±9.95 b | 1 125 | 4.51 | 2 000.10 | 6 750 | 4 500 |
T1 | 25 035±8.77 b | 105 | 0.42 | 1 000.05 | 3 375 | -2 325 |
Table 2 Economic benefits of different treatments
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/ (kg·hm-2) | 较CK Compared to CK | 微生物菌剂用量 Amount of topdressing/(L·hm-2) | 微生物菌剂投入成本/(元·hm-2) Fertilizer input cost/(yuan·hm-2) | 增产效益/(元·hm-2) Increased benefits/ (yuan·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
增产量 Increased yield/(kg·hm-2) | 增产率 Percentage/% | |||||
CK | 24 930±2.03 b | — | — | — | — | — |
T5 | 31 590±8.45 a | 6 660 | 26.71 | 5 000.25 | 16 875 | 49 725 |
T4 | 31 395±7.66 a | 6 465 | 25.93 | 4 000.20 | 13 500 | 51 150 |
T3 | 27 765±8.09 ab | 2 835 | 11.37 | 3 000.15 | 10 125 | 18 225 |
T2 | 26 055±9.95 b | 1 125 | 4.51 | 2 000.10 | 6 750 | 4 500 |
T1 | 25 035±8.77 b | 105 | 0.42 | 1 000.05 | 3 375 | -2 325 |
指标 Indicator | 有机质 Organic matter | pH | 碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen | 有效磷 Available phosphorus | 速效钾 Available potassium | 株高 Plant heigh | 地径 Ground diameter | POD | 过氧化氢酶CAT | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 超氧化物歧化酶SOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | -0.72** | ||||||||||
碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen | -0.72** | -0.84** | |||||||||
有效磷 Available phosphorus | 0.81** | -0.75** | 0.91** | ||||||||
速效钾 Available potassium | 0.746** | -0.74** | 0.90** | 0.88** | |||||||
株高 Plant height | 0.57* | -0.51* | 0.49* | 0.55* | 0.52* | ||||||
地径 Ground diameter | 0.73** | -0.51* | 0.70** | 0.69** | 0.69** | 0.408 | |||||
POD | 0.31 | -0.48* | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.436 | 0.174 | 0.035 | ||||
过氧化氢酶 CAT | 0.50* | -0.50* | 0.63** | 0.64** | 0.54* | 0.18 | 0.58* | 0.076 | |||
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.79** | -0.64** | 0.74** | 0.82** | 0.72** | 0.52* | 0.73** | 0.223 | 0.76** | ||
超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 0.77** | -0.71** | 0.79** | 0.80** | 0.75** | 0.364 | 0.71** | 0.128 | 0.51* | 0.63** | |
果形指数 Fruit shape index | 0.59* | -0.71** | 0.67** | 0.70** | 0.55* | 0.47* | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.45 | 0.56* | 0.51* |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of raspberry characters and soil indexes under microbial inoculum
指标 Indicator | 有机质 Organic matter | pH | 碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen | 有效磷 Available phosphorus | 速效钾 Available potassium | 株高 Plant heigh | 地径 Ground diameter | POD | 过氧化氢酶CAT | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 超氧化物歧化酶SOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | -0.72** | ||||||||||
碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen | -0.72** | -0.84** | |||||||||
有效磷 Available phosphorus | 0.81** | -0.75** | 0.91** | ||||||||
速效钾 Available potassium | 0.746** | -0.74** | 0.90** | 0.88** | |||||||
株高 Plant height | 0.57* | -0.51* | 0.49* | 0.55* | 0.52* | ||||||
地径 Ground diameter | 0.73** | -0.51* | 0.70** | 0.69** | 0.69** | 0.408 | |||||
POD | 0.31 | -0.48* | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.436 | 0.174 | 0.035 | ||||
过氧化氢酶 CAT | 0.50* | -0.50* | 0.63** | 0.64** | 0.54* | 0.18 | 0.58* | 0.076 | |||
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.79** | -0.64** | 0.74** | 0.82** | 0.72** | 0.52* | 0.73** | 0.223 | 0.76** | ||
超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 0.77** | -0.71** | 0.79** | 0.80** | 0.75** | 0.364 | 0.71** | 0.128 | 0.51* | 0.63** | |
果形指数 Fruit shape index | 0.59* | -0.71** | 0.67** | 0.70** | 0.55* | 0.47* | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.45 | 0.56* | 0.51* |
Fig. 8 PCoA analysis Compared to CK of red raspberry traits and soil indicators in different treatments under microbial inoculumNote: 1~3 represent three repeats of CK; 4~6 represent three repeats of T5; and so on, 16~18 represent three repeats of T1.
1 | R.Workers PETCHESKY, hazardsreproductive, and the politics of protection : an introduction [J]. Feminist Studies, 1980, 5(2): 233-245. |
2 | CHEN J Y, DU J, LI M L, et al.. Degradation kinetics and pathways of red raspberry anthocyanins in model and juice systems and their correlation with color and antioxidant changes during storage [J/OL]. LWT Food Sci. Technol., 2020,128: 109448 [2022-03-16]. . |
3 | 张海军, 王彦辉, 张清华, 等. 国内外树莓产业发展现状研究 [J]. 林业实用技术, 2010 (10): 54- 56. |
ZHANG H J, WANG Y H, ZHANG Q H, et al.. Study on the development status of raspberry industry at home and abroad [J]. Practical For. Technol., 2010 (10): 54-56. | |
4 | 张婉欣. 尚志市树莓产业发展研究 [D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2018. |
ZHANG W X. Research on the development of raspberry industry in Shangzhi city [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2018. | |
5 | 汪生新. 浅谈化肥过量施用的危害及防治措施 [J]. 青海农林科技, 2018(2): 34-35, 67. |
WANG S X. Harm of excessive application of chemical fertilizer and its control measures [J]. Sci. Technol. Qinghai Agric. For., 2018(2): 34-35, 67. | |
6 | 邹湘, 易博, 张奇春, 等. 长期施肥对稻田土壤微生物群落结构及氮循环功能微生物数量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2158-2167. |
ZOU X, YI B, ZHANG Q C, et al.. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil microbial community structure and nitrogen cycle function and microbial quantity in paddy field [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2020, 26(12): 2158-2167. | |
7 | MASSAHI S, NADERI D, PESSARAKLI M. Studying the effect of two biological fertilizers on salt tolerance of tall fescue (Festuca arundinaceae schreb.) [J]. J. Plant Nutr., 2018,41(17):2210-2221. |
8 | 李宁, 王珊珊, 马丽丽, 等. 两株高效溶磷菌的溶磷能力及其对玉米生长和红壤磷素形态的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(2): 275-283. |
LI N, WANG S S, MA L L, et al.. Phosphorus solubilizing ability of two highly effective phosphorus solubilizing bacteria and their effects on maize growth and phosphorus form in red soil [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2021, 27 (2): 275-283. | |
9 | 程鸿燕, 张大琪, 黄斌, 等. 微生物菌肥对熏蒸剂处理后土壤微生态的影响研究进展 [J].农药学学报, 2020, 22(5): 734-741. |
CHENG H Y, ZHANG D Q, HUANG B, et al.. Research progress of microbial fertilizer on soil microecology after fumigant treatment [J]. J. Pest. Sci., 2020, 22(5): 734-741. | |
10 | 李俊, 姜昕, 马鸣超. 新形势下微生物肥料产业运行状况及发展方向 [J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2108-2114. |
LI J, JIANG X, MA M C. Operation status and development direction of microbial fertilizer industry under the new situation [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2020, 26 (12): 2108-2114. | |
11 | 张博琦, 金锡九. 生物菌肥对饲料玉米生长及营养成分的影响 [J]. 饲料研究, 2020, 43(11): 88-91. |
ZHANG B Q, JIN X J. Effects of microbial fertilizer on growth and nutritional components of feed corn [J]. Feed Res., 2020, 43 (11): 88-91. | |
12 | 李玉奇, 辛世杰, 奥岩松. 微生物菌肥对温室黄瓜生长、产量及品质的影响 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(1): 259-263. |
LI Y Q, XIN S J, AO Y S. Effects of microbial fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of cucumber in greenhouse [J]. China Agron. Bull., 2012, 28 (1): 259-263. | |
13 | DASCI M, GULLAP M K, ERKOVAN H I, et al.. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria applications on clover dominant meadow: Ⅱ. chemical composition [J]. Turk. J. Field Crops, 2010, 15(1): 18-24. |
14 | HU X, CHEN J, GUO J. Two phosphate- and potassium-solubilizing bacteria isolated from Tianmu mountain, Zhejiang, China [J]. World J. Microb. Biot., 2006, 22(9): 983-990. |
15 | DIJIANA S, TOMO M, PAVLE M, et al.. Influence of organic, organo-mineral and mineral fertilisers on cane traits, productivity and berry quality of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2019, 252: 370-378. |
16 | 张敏硕, 赵英男, 杨威, 等. 微生物菌剂对张北冷凉坝上地区马铃薯产量, 品质及活化土壤磷钾的效果 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(3): 235-239. |
ZHANG M S, ZHAO Y N, YANG W, et al.. Effects of microbial inoculants on potato yield, quality and activation of soil phosphorus and potassium in the Lengliang area of Zhangbei [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2019, 33(3): 235-239. | |
17 | 王迎. 红树莓叶片矿质元素变化规律及施肥对果实功能性成分的影响[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2018. |
WANG Y. Changes of mineral elements in red raspberry leaves and effects of fertilization on functional components of fruits [D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2018. | |
18 | 李冬梅, 魏珉, 张海森, 等. 氮、磷、钾用量和配比对温室黄瓜叶片相关代谢酶活性的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(3): 382-387. |
LI D M, WEI M, ZHANG H S, et al.. Effects of N,P,K rates and ratios on activities of metabolism enzymes in leaves of cucumber in greenhouse [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2006, 12(3): 382-387. | |
19 | 郭熙盛, 叶舒娅, 王文军, 等. 钾肥品种与用量对黄瓜产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(3): 292-297. |
GUO X S, YE S Y, WANG W J, et al.. Effect of different K sources and rates on the yield and quality of cucumber [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2004, 10(3): 292-297. | |
20 | 武杞蔓, 田诗涵, 李昀烨, 等. 微生物菌肥对设施黄瓜生长、产量及品质的影响 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(1): 125-131. |
WU Q M, TIAN S H, LI Y Y, et al.. Effects of microbial fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of greenhouse cucumber [J]. Biotechnol. Bull., 2022, 38(1): 125-131. | |
21 | 李青梅, 陆秀君, 张敏硕, 等. 微生物菌剂和生根粉对甜瓜产量和土壤生态效应的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(7): 100-105. |
LI Q M, LU X J, ZHANG M S, et al.. Effects of microbial agents and rooting powder on melon yield and soil ecological effects [J]. Northern Hortic., 2020 (7): 100-105. | |
22 | YANG W L, GONG T, WANG J W, et al.. Effects of compound microbial fertilizer on soil characteristics and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [J]. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 2020, 20(4): 740-748. |
23 | 王赫, 李晓雪, 王亚玲, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥和菌剂对辣椒产量、品质和养分累积的影响 [J]. 北方园艺, 2021(16): 1-7. |
WANG H, LI X X, WANG Y L, et al.. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer and bacterial agent on yield, quality and nutrient accumulation of pepper [J]. Northern Hortic., 2021(16): 1-7. | |
24 | AKKOPRU A, AKAT Ş, OZAKTAN H, et al.. The long-term colonization dynamics of endophytic bacteria in cucumber plants, and their effects on yield, fruit quality and angular leaf spot disease [J/OL]. Sci. Hortic., 2021, 282: 110005 [2022-03-16]. . |
25 | TANGOLAR S, TANGOLAR S, TORUN A A, et al.. The effect of microbial fertilizer applications on grape yield, quality and mineral nutrition of some early table grape varieties [J]. Selcuk J. Agric. Food Sci., 2019, 33(2), 62-66. |
26 | KAFI S A, ARABHOSSEINI S, KARIMI E, et al.. Pseudomonas putida P 3- 57 induces cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) defense responses and improves fruit quality characteristics under commercial greenhouse conditions [J/OL]. Sci. Hortic., 2021, 280:109942 [2022-03-16]. . |
27 | MI S, ZHANGX, WANG Y, et al.. Effect of different fertilizers on the physicochemical properties, chemical element and volatile composition of cucumbers [J/OL]. Food Chem., 2022, 367: 130667[2022-03-16]. . |
28 | 刘东阳, 江连强, 陈树鸿, 等. 微生物菌剂与不同有机肥协同作用对烟草根结线虫病的防控效果研究 [J]. 植物医生, 2021, 34(2): 23-28. |
LIU D Y, JIANG L Q, CHEN S H, et al.. Study on the synergistic effect of microbial agents and different organic fertilizers on tobacco root knot nematode disease [J]. Plant Doctor, 2021, 34 (2): 23-28. | |
29 | 张恩平, 张淑红, 李天来, 等. 蔬菜钾素营养的研究现状与展望 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(8): 265-268. |
ZHANG E P, ZHANG S H, LI T L, et al.. Advance of research on potassium nutrition [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2005, 21(8): 265-268. | |
30 | 彭福田, 姜远茂, 顾曼如, 等. 不同负荷水平下氮素对苹果果实生长发育的影响 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(6): 690-694. |
PENG F T, JIANG Y M, GU M R, et al.. Effect of nitrogen on apple fruit development in different load [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2002, 35(6): 690-694. | |
31 | 姜永雷, 肖雨, 邓小鹏, 等. 微生物菌剂对烟草连作土壤理化性质及土壤胞外酶酶活性的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2022, 28(4): 59-66. |
JIANG Y L, XIAO Y, DENG X P, et al.. Effects of microbial agents on soil physical and chemical properties and soil extracellular enzyme activities of continuous cropping tobacco [J]. Acta Tob. Sin., 2022, 28(4): 59-66. | |
32 | 王国丽, 张晓丽, 张晓霞,等. 施用功能微生物菌剂对重度盐碱地向日葵生长及土壤微生物的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2021(5):133-139. |
WANG G L, ZHANG X L, ZHANG X X, et al.. Effects of applying functional microbial agents on sunflower growth and soil microorganism in severe saline alkali soil [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2021(5):133-139. | |
33 | 李星星. 复合微生物菌剂对土壤特性及马铃薯生长与产量的影响 [D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020. |
LI X X. Effects of compound microbial agents on soil characteristics and potato growth and yield [D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020. | |
34 | WANG Z, CHEN Z, XU Z, et al.. Effects of phosphate- solubilizing bacteria and N2- fixing bacteria on nutrient uptake, growthplant, and bioactive compound accumulation in Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) iljinskaja [J/OL]. Forests, 2019, 10(9): 772 [2022-03-16]. . |
35 | YU X, LIU X, ZHU T H, et al.. Co-inoculation with phosphate- solubilzing and nitrogen- fixing bacteria on solubilization of rock phosphate and their effect on growth promotion and nutrient uptake by walnut`[J]. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 2012, 50: 112-117. |
[1] | Shijian BAI, Jinge HU, Jiuyun WU, Wen ZHANG, Hui XIE, Ronghua ZHAO, Guang CHEN, Junshe CAI. Effects of Rootstocks on the Growth Characteristics and Fruit Quality of ‘Crimson Seedless’ Grapes in Turpan Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 76-87. |
[2] | Shijiang ZHU, Hu LI, Wen XU, Yating FENG. Effects of Soil Moisture Content on Fruit Quality in Citrus Orchards Within Three Gorges Reservoir Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 201-207. |
[3] | LIU Qianjie, CHENG Yunxia, JIA Kai, SHI Zhenyu, ZHANG Jing, WEI Shaowei, WU Hui*. Influences of Nitrogen Application on Nitrogen Metabolism Enzymes Activities, Yield and Quality of Tomato in Composite Sand Culture [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 183-191. |
[4] | YANG Mengyu1, ZHANG Qi1*, YUAN Zhenyang1, CHEN Jun1, YAN Li2. Effects of Intercropping Grass on Peach Leaf and Fruit Quality in Greenhouse of Southern Xinjiang [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 178-185. |
[5] | CHENG Dawei, CHEN Jinyong*, GU Hong, LU Huiran, ZHANG Yang, GUO Xizhi, QI Shuai, LI Zhengyang. Research on Floral Cluster Pruning Methods of Red Globe Grape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 44-50. |
[6] | SHI Jianhua1§, QI Lianfen1§, WANG Dandan1, LI Yan1, ZHANG Qingyin1, GE Xizhen2, TIAN Dongliang1*. Effects of Different Control Measures on Tomato Quality, Yield and Disease Incidence in Greenhouse [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 88-95. |
[7] | MA Wenyao1,2, CHENG Dawei2, HUANG Haina2, CHEN Jinyong2*, YANG Yingjun1*. Effect of Prohydrojasmon on Coloration and Quality of the ‘Jumeigui’ Grape Berry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 118-125. |
[8] | ZHANG Ren, ZHANG Pengcheng, WU Huanhuan, ZHANG Xuedong* . Impact of Meteorological Factors on Fruit Quality of Jun Jujube in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 113-122. |
[9] | WANG Cheng1,2, WU Dongfeng2, HE Weizhong2, WU Wenliang1*. Preliminary Research of Nutrition Quality Characteristics and Characterization Indexes of Xinjiang Jun Jujube [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(12): 91-98. |
[10] | YU Liyang1, ZUO Lihui1, LI Xiuping2, LI Shunhua3, WANG Yupan1, . Comparison of Fruit Quality among 4 Malus sieversii Clones [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(8): 33-40. |
[11] | KANG Gongping1, WU Lintao2, ZHANG Ning1, XIANG Zejun3. Effect of Silicon on Photosynthetic Characteristics of the Leaf and Fruit Quality of Siraitia grosvenorii [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(7): 50-54. |
[12] | LI Zhixia, NIE Jiyun*. Nondestructive Testing Technologies and its Application in Fruit Quality and Safety Determination [J]. , 2013, 15(4): 31-35. |
[13] | ZONG Yuanyuan, LI Boqiang, QIN Guozheng, ZHANG Zhanquan, TIAN Shiping*. Toxicity of Patulin on Fruit Quality and its Research Progress [J]. , 2013, 15(4): 36-41. |
[14] | WANG Jing, LU Yue-bang, ZHANG Xiao-ming, YAN Guo-hua, ZHOU Yu, ZHANG Kai-chun. Incidence of Sweet Cherry Crinkle Leaf Disease in Beijing and its Influence to Fruit Production and Quality [J]. , 2012, 14(4): 61-65. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||