Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 124-133.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0799
• ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH • Previous Articles
Tongyu ZHANG(), Ying GOU, Qi LI, Li YANG(
)
Received:
2022-09-20
Accepted:
2023-01-16
Online:
2024-03-15
Published:
2024-03-07
Contact:
Li YANG
通讯作者:
杨莉
作者简介:
张桐毓 E-mail: 953445964@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Tongyu ZHANG, Ying GOU, Qi LI, Li YANG. Effects of Ginseng Rust Rot on Ginseng Quality and Soil Related Factors[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 124-133.
张桐毓, 勾颖, 李琪, 杨莉. 人参锈腐病对人参品质和土壤相关因子的影响研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 124-133.
取样点 Sample point | 种植时间 Planting time/a | 病级 Disease degree | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
敦化市 Dunhua city | 2 | √ | √ | √ | ||
3 | √ | √ | √ | |||
4 | √ | √ | ||||
珲春市 Hunchun city | 4 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
龙井市 Longjing city | 4 | √ | √ | √ | ||
5 | √ | √ | ||||
汪清县 Wangqing county | 5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Table 1 Sample point information
取样点 Sample point | 种植时间 Planting time/a | 病级 Disease degree | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
敦化市 Dunhua city | 2 | √ | √ | √ | ||
3 | √ | √ | √ | |||
4 | √ | √ | ||||
珲春市 Hunchun city | 4 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
龙井市 Longjing city | 4 | √ | √ | √ | ||
5 | √ | √ | ||||
汪清县 Wangqing county | 5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
时间 Time/min | 水 Water/% | 乙腈 Acetonitrile/% |
---|---|---|
40 | 79 | 21 |
42 | 74 | 26 |
46 | 68 | 32 |
72 | 60 | 40 |
74 | 51 | 49 |
78 | 15 | 85 |
80 | 0 | 100 |
82 | 81 | 19 |
Table 2 Saponins elution procedures
时间 Time/min | 水 Water/% | 乙腈 Acetonitrile/% |
---|---|---|
40 | 79 | 21 |
42 | 74 | 26 |
46 | 68 | 32 |
72 | 60 | 40 |
74 | 51 | 49 |
78 | 15 | 85 |
80 | 0 | 100 |
82 | 81 | 19 |
时间 Time/min | 甲醇 Methanol/% | 磷酸二氢钠 Sodium dihydrogen phosphate/% |
---|---|---|
1 | 45.0 | 55.0 |
10 | 55.0 | 45.0 |
13 | 71.0 | 29.0 |
15 | 45.0 | 55.0 |
Table 3 Phenol pickling process
时间 Time/min | 甲醇 Methanol/% | 磷酸二氢钠 Sodium dihydrogen phosphate/% |
---|---|---|
1 | 45.0 | 55.0 |
10 | 55.0 | 45.0 |
13 | 71.0 | 29.0 |
15 | 45.0 | 55.0 |
成分 Ingredient | 回归方程 Regression equation | 决定系数 R2 | 线性范围 Linearity range/(µg·mL-1) |
---|---|---|---|
Rg1 | Y=471.10X+7.325 | 1.000 0 | 0.125~2.000 |
Re | Y=385.02X+5.727 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rf | Y=357.20X+0.938 | 1.000 0 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rb1 | Y=276.14X+5.638 | 1.000 0 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rg2 | Y=450.48X+2.952 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rc | Y=239.24X+5.564 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rb2 | Y=269.98X+3.067 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rb3 | Y=269.55X+0.705 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rg3 | Y=302.66X+3.355 | 0.999 7 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rd | Y=286.91X+0.928 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
苯甲酸Benzoic acid | Y=2.546 8X+1.176 | 0.999 3 | 1.000~8.000 |
邻苯二甲酸Phthalic acid | Y=4.120 9X+3.160 | 0.999 1 | 1.000~8.000 |
肉桂酸Cinnamic acid | Y=4.195 2X+1.279 | 0.999 0 | 1.000~8.000 |
丁二酸Succinic acid | Y=3.703 1X+2.326 | 0.999 2 | 1.000~8.000 |
Table 4 Regression equations of 14 effective components
成分 Ingredient | 回归方程 Regression equation | 决定系数 R2 | 线性范围 Linearity range/(µg·mL-1) |
---|---|---|---|
Rg1 | Y=471.10X+7.325 | 1.000 0 | 0.125~2.000 |
Re | Y=385.02X+5.727 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rf | Y=357.20X+0.938 | 1.000 0 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rb1 | Y=276.14X+5.638 | 1.000 0 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rg2 | Y=450.48X+2.952 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rc | Y=239.24X+5.564 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rb2 | Y=269.98X+3.067 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rb3 | Y=269.55X+0.705 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rg3 | Y=302.66X+3.355 | 0.999 7 | 0.125~2.000 |
Rd | Y=286.91X+0.928 | 0.999 9 | 0.125~2.000 |
苯甲酸Benzoic acid | Y=2.546 8X+1.176 | 0.999 3 | 1.000~8.000 |
邻苯二甲酸Phthalic acid | Y=4.120 9X+3.160 | 0.999 1 | 1.000~8.000 |
肉桂酸Cinnamic acid | Y=4.195 2X+1.279 | 0.999 0 | 1.000~8.000 |
丁二酸Succinic acid | Y=3.703 1X+2.326 | 0.999 2 | 1.000~8.000 |
病级Disease degree | 参数 Parameter | 皂苷含量Saponin content/(μg·g-1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rg1 | Re | Rf | Rb1 | Rg2 | Rc | Rb2 | Rb3 | Rg3 | Rd | ||
0级 0 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.11 | 0.31 | 2.25 | 0.49 | 2.65 | 0.43 | 2.05 | 2.06 | 1.07 | 1.66 |
最大值Maximum | 4.43 | 6.42 | 48.17 | 11.82 | 2.65 | 0.43 | 6.25 | 7.64 | 5.47 | 14.72 | |
均值Mean | 1.49 | 2.82 | 15.97 | 4.45 | 2.65 | 0.43 | 3.86 | 3.69 | 2.99 | 4.22 | |
频率Frequency/% | 35.71 | 28.57 | 71.43 | 57.14 | 3.57 | 3.57 | 10.71 | 28.57 | 25.00 | 60.71 | |
1级 1 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.22 | 0.21 | 1.29 | 0.81 | 2.58 | 0.54 | 1.69 | 2.43 | 1.52 | 1.69 |
最大值Maximum | 6.27 | 3.43 | 31.21 | 15.34 | 38.49 | 0.88 | 7.88 | 10.80 | 8.67 | 25.43 | |
均值Mean | 2.37 | 1.82 | 9.02 | 7.17 | 20.53 | 0.71 | 4.47 | 5.12 | 4.96 | 6.56 | |
频率Frequency/% | 23.81 | 9.52 | 71.43 | 38.10 | 9.52 | 9.52 | 23.81 | 47.62 | 33.33 | 66.67 | |
2级 2 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.60 | 0.28 | 6.26 | 0.88 | 12.55 | — | 7.49 | 4.60 | 4.89 | 3.41 |
最大值Maximum | 8.36 | 1.31 | 50.68 | 17.33 | 33.74 | — | 7.49 | 96.44 | 5.06 | 15.23 | |
均值Mean | 2.97 | 0.79 | 27.92 | 8.24 | 23.14 | — | 7.49 | 27.44 | 4.97 | 7.28 | |
频率Frequency/% | 53.85 | 15.38 | 53.85 | 46.15 | 15.38 | 0.00 | 7.69 | 38.46 | 15.38 | 30.77 | |
3级 3 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.85 | 0.45 | 24.83 | 3.46 | 26.47 | 2.96 | — | 39.78 | 1.35 | 1.50 |
最大值Maximum | 14.17 | 1.80 | 36.25 | 7.59 | 26.47 | 2.96 | — | 39.78 | 17.26 | 6.93 | |
均值Mean | 7.51 | 1.13 | 30.54 | 5.53 | 26.47 | 2.96 | — | 39.78 | 9.31 | 4.22 | |
频率Frequency/% | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | |
4级 4 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.31 | 0.31 | 1.52 | 0.40 | 2.02 | — | — | 5.61 | 6.36 | 4.94 |
最大值Maximum | 19.92 | 0.31 | 40.55 | 11.28 | 34.75 | — | — | 38.67 | 6.36 | 4.94 | |
均值Mean | 10.99 | 0.31 | 21.03 | 6.86 | 15.52 | — | — | 22.14 | 6.36 | 4.94 | |
频率Frequency/% | 100.00 | 33.33 | 66.67 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 66.67 | 33.33 | 33.33 |
Table 5 Saponins content in rhizosphere soil of infected ginseng
病级Disease degree | 参数 Parameter | 皂苷含量Saponin content/(μg·g-1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rg1 | Re | Rf | Rb1 | Rg2 | Rc | Rb2 | Rb3 | Rg3 | Rd | ||
0级 0 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.11 | 0.31 | 2.25 | 0.49 | 2.65 | 0.43 | 2.05 | 2.06 | 1.07 | 1.66 |
最大值Maximum | 4.43 | 6.42 | 48.17 | 11.82 | 2.65 | 0.43 | 6.25 | 7.64 | 5.47 | 14.72 | |
均值Mean | 1.49 | 2.82 | 15.97 | 4.45 | 2.65 | 0.43 | 3.86 | 3.69 | 2.99 | 4.22 | |
频率Frequency/% | 35.71 | 28.57 | 71.43 | 57.14 | 3.57 | 3.57 | 10.71 | 28.57 | 25.00 | 60.71 | |
1级 1 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.22 | 0.21 | 1.29 | 0.81 | 2.58 | 0.54 | 1.69 | 2.43 | 1.52 | 1.69 |
最大值Maximum | 6.27 | 3.43 | 31.21 | 15.34 | 38.49 | 0.88 | 7.88 | 10.80 | 8.67 | 25.43 | |
均值Mean | 2.37 | 1.82 | 9.02 | 7.17 | 20.53 | 0.71 | 4.47 | 5.12 | 4.96 | 6.56 | |
频率Frequency/% | 23.81 | 9.52 | 71.43 | 38.10 | 9.52 | 9.52 | 23.81 | 47.62 | 33.33 | 66.67 | |
2级 2 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.60 | 0.28 | 6.26 | 0.88 | 12.55 | — | 7.49 | 4.60 | 4.89 | 3.41 |
最大值Maximum | 8.36 | 1.31 | 50.68 | 17.33 | 33.74 | — | 7.49 | 96.44 | 5.06 | 15.23 | |
均值Mean | 2.97 | 0.79 | 27.92 | 8.24 | 23.14 | — | 7.49 | 27.44 | 4.97 | 7.28 | |
频率Frequency/% | 53.85 | 15.38 | 53.85 | 46.15 | 15.38 | 0.00 | 7.69 | 38.46 | 15.38 | 30.77 | |
3级 3 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.85 | 0.45 | 24.83 | 3.46 | 26.47 | 2.96 | — | 39.78 | 1.35 | 1.50 |
最大值Maximum | 14.17 | 1.80 | 36.25 | 7.59 | 26.47 | 2.96 | — | 39.78 | 17.26 | 6.93 | |
均值Mean | 7.51 | 1.13 | 30.54 | 5.53 | 26.47 | 2.96 | — | 39.78 | 9.31 | 4.22 | |
频率Frequency/% | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | |
4级 4 degree | 最小值Minimum | 0.31 | 0.31 | 1.52 | 0.40 | 2.02 | — | — | 5.61 | 6.36 | 4.94 |
最大值Maximum | 19.92 | 0.31 | 40.55 | 11.28 | 34.75 | — | — | 38.67 | 6.36 | 4.94 | |
均值Mean | 10.99 | 0.31 | 21.03 | 6.86 | 15.52 | — | — | 22.14 | 6.36 | 4.94 | |
频率Frequency/% | 100.00 | 33.33 | 66.67 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 66.67 | 33.33 | 33.33 |
Fig. 2 Content of phenolic acid in rhizosphere soil of infected ginsengNote: * indicates significant difference compared with 0 degree healthy strains at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Physicochemical properties of soil of diseased ginseng rhizosphereNote: * indicates significant difference compared with grade 0 healthy strains at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Enzyme activity of rhizosphere soil of infected ginsengNote: * indicates significant difference compared with 0 degree healthy strains at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 5 Number of arachnoides in rhizosphere soil of infected ginsengNote:* indicates significant difference compared with 0 degree healthy strains at P<0.05 level.
种类 Kind | 因子 Factor | 灰色关联度 Grey relational degree |
---|---|---|
皂苷类物质 Saponin | Rg3 | 0.467 1 |
Rd | 0.343 9 | |
Rb1 | 0.393 4 | |
Rb3 | 0.402 0 | |
Rf | 0.372 2 | |
Rg2 | 0.376 9 | |
Rg1 | 0.611 1* | |
Rb2 | 0.182 5 | |
Rc | 0.271 8 | |
Re | 0.318 1 | |
酚酸类物质 Phenolic acid | 肉桂酸 Cinnamic acid | 0.619 9* |
己二酸 Adipic acid | 0.381 0 | |
丁二酸 Succinic acid | 0.457 8 | |
苯甲酸 Benzoic acid | 0.374 9 | |
邻苯二甲酸 Phthalic acid | 0.413 2 | |
酶活性 Enzyme activity | 脲酶 Urease | 0.365 1 |
过氧化氢酶 Catalase | 0.421 6 | |
漆酶 Laccase | 0.367 4 | |
理化性质 Physicochemical property | pH | 0.488 0 |
电导率Electrical conductivity | 0.456 6 | |
碱解氮Available nitrogen | 0.496 7 | |
有效磷Available phosphate | 0.497 5 | |
速效钾Rapidly available potassium | 0.362 5 | |
有机质 Organic matter | 0.414 0 |
Table 6 Grey correlation degree between each factor and the number of pathogenic bacteria
种类 Kind | 因子 Factor | 灰色关联度 Grey relational degree |
---|---|---|
皂苷类物质 Saponin | Rg3 | 0.467 1 |
Rd | 0.343 9 | |
Rb1 | 0.393 4 | |
Rb3 | 0.402 0 | |
Rf | 0.372 2 | |
Rg2 | 0.376 9 | |
Rg1 | 0.611 1* | |
Rb2 | 0.182 5 | |
Rc | 0.271 8 | |
Re | 0.318 1 | |
酚酸类物质 Phenolic acid | 肉桂酸 Cinnamic acid | 0.619 9* |
己二酸 Adipic acid | 0.381 0 | |
丁二酸 Succinic acid | 0.457 8 | |
苯甲酸 Benzoic acid | 0.374 9 | |
邻苯二甲酸 Phthalic acid | 0.413 2 | |
酶活性 Enzyme activity | 脲酶 Urease | 0.365 1 |
过氧化氢酶 Catalase | 0.421 6 | |
漆酶 Laccase | 0.367 4 | |
理化性质 Physicochemical property | pH | 0.488 0 |
电导率Electrical conductivity | 0.456 6 | |
碱解氮Available nitrogen | 0.496 7 | |
有效磷Available phosphate | 0.497 5 | |
速效钾Rapidly available potassium | 0.362 5 | |
有机质 Organic matter | 0.414 0 |
1 | 张道明. 人参皂苷Rg5对人食管癌细胞促凋亡及联合顺铂抗肿瘤作用的研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018. |
ZHANG D M. Researches on anti-apoptosis effect of ginsenoside Rg5 and anti-tumor effect combined with cisplatin on human esophageal cancer cells [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018. | |
2 | 方斯文. 人参化感物质对土壤酶、微生物多样性的影响及其在土壤中的迁移研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2012. |
FANG S W. Ginseng allelochemicals’ impact on soil enzyme activities and microbial diversity, as well as ginseng allelochemicals’ mobility in soil [D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2012. | |
3 | 王梓, 李勇, 丁万隆. 人参化感自毒作用与连作障碍机制研究进展[J]. 中国现代中药, 2017, 19(7): 1040-1044. |
WANG Z, LI Y, DING W L. Advances in allelopathic autotoxicity and continuous cropping obstacle of Panax ginseng [J]. Mod. Chin. Med., 2017, 19(7): 1040-1044. | |
4 | 黄玉茜, 韩晓日, 杨劲峰, 等.花生连作土壤微生物区系变化研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(3): 552-556. |
HUANG Y Q, HAN X R, YANG J F, et al.. Studies on the changes of soil microbial communities under peanuts continuous cropping [J]. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2011, 42(3): 552-556 | |
5 | 李振方, 杨燕秋, 谢冬凤, 等. 连作条件下地黄药用品质及土壤微生态特性分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(2): 217-224. |
LI Z F, YANG Y Q, XIE D F, et al.. Effects of continuous cropping on the quality of Rehmannia glutinosa L. and soil micro-ecology [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2012, 20(2): 217-224. | |
6 | ABBOROVA D, SAYYED R Z, AZIMOV A, et al.. Impact of mineral fertilizers on mineral nutrients in the ginger rhizome and on soil enzymes activities and soil properties [J]. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 2021, 28(9): 5268-5274. |
7 | 丛微, 喻海茫, 于晶晶, 等. 人参种植对林地土壤细菌群落结构和代谢功能的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(1): 162-171. |
CONG W, YU H M, YU J J, et al.. Effects of ginseng cultivation on soil microbial community structure and metabolic functions in forest land [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2021, 41(1): 162-171. | |
8 | 李昕月, 付俊范, 魏晓兵, 等. 长白山区人参锈腐病发生危害调查及杀菌剂田间药效试验[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(9): 69-72. |
LI X Y, FU J F, WEI X B, et al.. Toxicity test and field control effects of 11 new fungicides against cylindrocarpon destructans [J]. J. Agric., 2015, 5(9): 69-72. | |
9 | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 1-495. |
10 | 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1986:1-346. |
11 | RAHMAN M, PUNJA Z K. Biochemistry of ginseng root tissues affected by rusty root symptoms [J]. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2005, 43(12): 1103-1114. |
12 | 刘延硕. 农田人参锈腐病影响因素的研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2011. |
LIU Y S. The study on influencing factors of the rust and rot of farmland ginseng [D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2011. | |
13 | TAN G, LIU Y J, PENG S G, et al.. Soil potentials to resist continuous cropping obstacle: three field cases [J/OL]. Environ. Res., 2021, 200: 111319 [2022-08-20]. . |
14 | 张爱华, 雷锋杰, 许永华, 等. 外源人参皂苷对人参种子萌发和幼根抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9): 4934-4941. |
ZHANG A H, LEI F J, XU Y H, et al.. Effects of ginsenosides on the germinating of ginseng seeds and on the activity of antioxidant enzymes of the radicles of ginseng seedlings in vitro [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2009,29(9): 4934-4941. | |
15 | CHU L L, BAE H. Bacterial endophytes from ginseng and their biotechnological application [J]. J. Ginseng Res., 2022, 46(1): 1-10. |
16 | VIVIANE R, JANA B W, SUSANNE K, et al.. Correction to: reduced microbial potential for the degradation of phenolic compounds in the rhizosphere of apple plantlets grown in soils affected by replant disease [J/OL]. Environ. Microbiome, 2019, 14(1): 9 [2022-08-20]. . |
17 | 班洁静, 侯明生, 蔡丽. 土壤pH对芸薹根肿菌侵染及病害发生的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(6): 55-59. |
BAN J J, HOU M S, CAI L. Effects of pH on Plasmodiophora brassica infection and disease development [J]. Plant Prot., 2015, 41(6): 55-59. | |
18 | XIE Z W, MA Q, PENG W Y, et al.. Research progress on continuous cropping obstacle and green control of strawberry [J/OL]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, 251: 02044 [2022-08-20]. . |
19 | DANIEL C S, KENDALL K, BRYAN C, et al.. Soil acidification modifies soil depth-microbiome relationships in a no-till wheat cropping system [J/OL]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2020, 149: 107939 [2022-08-20]. . |
20 | 洪艳华. 长期耕作对黑土理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[D]. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2021. |
HONG Y H. Effects of long-term tillage on physicochemical properties and microbial community structure of black soil [D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2021. | |
21 | 韩海蓉, 李屹, 陈来生, 等. 设施辣椒连作对土壤理化性状、酶活性及微生物区系的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(3): 237-242. |
HAN H R, LI Y, CHEN L S, et al.. Effects of continuous pepper cultivation on soil physical and chemical properties, enzyme activity and microbial flora [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2021(3): 237-242. | |
22 | 舒健虹, 蔡一鸣, 丁磊磊, 等. 不同放牧强度对贵州人工草地土壤养分及活性有机碳的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2018, 37(1): 42-48. |
SHU J H, CAI Y M, DING L L, et al.. Effects of different grazing intensities on soil nutrient and active organic carbon in Guizhou artificial grassland [J]. Ecol. Sci., 2018, 37(1): 42-48. | |
23 | 战宇, 张连学, 孟祥茹, 等. 不同盆栽人参土壤酚酸含量及酶活性变化研究[J/OL]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2022 [2022-08-20]. . |
ZHAN Y, ZHANG L X, MENG X R, et al.. Changes of phenolic acid content and enzyme activity in soil of different pot ginseng [J/OL]. J. Jilin Agric.Univ., 2022 [2022-08-20]. . | |
24 | 李雪萍, 李建宏, 漆永红, 等. 青稞根腐病对根际土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17): 5640-5649. |
LI X P, LI J H, QI Y H, et al.. Effects of naked barley root rot on rhizosphere soil microorganisms and enzyme activity [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2017, 37(17): 5640-5649. |
[1] | Xingsheng YIN, Lingfeng BAO, Yongyu PU, Jiali SUN, Qing ZHANG, Haiping LI, Mingying YANG, Yueping LIN, Huaixin WANG, Yonghong HE, Peiwen YANG. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Bio-organic Fertilization on Tobacco Soil Characteristics and Tobacco Bacterial Wilt Control [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 122-131. |
[2] | Hongyuan LIU, Zhihua ZHOU, Guangxin ZHAO, Qinrui SHEN. Effects of Long-term Biochar Application on Greenhouse Gas Emission and Its Temporal Effect in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 178-186. |
[3] | PANG Zhe, WANG Qilong, LI Juan. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties, Rice Yield and Economic Benefits in Low-lying Saline Alkali Land in Northern Shaanxi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 174-180. |
[4] | Juxian GUO, Bishan OUYANG, Guihua LI, Mei FU, Wenlong LUO, Shanwei LUO, Meilian LU. Effect of Bio-organic Fertilizers on Quality and Soil of Continuous Crop Chinese Flowering Cabbage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 182-191. |
[5] | Yanchen WEI, Jixiang CHEN, Yonggang WANG, Tongtong MENG, Yalong HAN, Mei LI. Analysis of Bacterial Diversity in the Rhizosphere Soil of Salsolapasserina and Its Correlation with the Soil Physical and Chemical Properties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 209-217. |
[6] | FAN Na, PENG Zhidong, BAI Wenbin*, ZHAO Jianwu. Influences of Microbial Agents on Soil Enzyme Activity and Sorghum Growth [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(2): 185-192. |
[7] | WANG Siji, GUO Yanchun, ZENG Lusheng, SUN Xianmin, CHU Qinggang, WANG Sheng. Effects of Suaeda Planting Rate on Soil Enzyme Activity and Aggregation of Coastal Saline Alkali Land [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 179-185. |
[8] | HUANG Yanfei, CHEN Junmei, XIN Yaning, WU Qingli. Effects of Gypsum Application on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Soda Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 139-146. |
[9] | GAO Riping, §, LIU Xiaoyue, §, DU Erxiao, HAN Yunfei, REN Yongfeng, GAO Yu, ZHAO Peiyi, LI Huanchun, ZHANG Peng, . Influences of Ridge Film and Furrow Sowing and Straw Returning on Soil Moisture, Enzyme Activity and Yield of Maize in Loess Plateau of Inner Mongolia [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 181-190. |
[10] | LIU Songtao 1, TIAN Chunli 1, CAO Wenmei 1, ZHENG Beibei 1, LI Pengcheng 2, DONG Helin 2. Characteristics Analysis of Rhizosphere Microorganisms and Enzyme Activities of Cotton Based on Different Soil Textures [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(2): 73-79. |
[11] | WANG Mengyuan1, DU Yanquan2, ZHU Jianqiang1*. Influences Compound Probiotics on Wheat Growth in the Seedling Stage and Soil Enzyme Activity [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(10): 98-106. |
[12] | LI Fengguo1, MA Longchuan2, KONG Yong3, KONG Lei4, LI Guanxi3*, ZHOU Jing3*. Effect of Continuous Garlic Cropping on Soil Nutrients, Microbial Structure and Enzyme Activity [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(1): 141-147. |
[13] | ZHANG Meng1, ZHAO Huan1, XIAO Houjun1, WANG Zhengyin2, GOU Jiulan1, QIN Song1*. Influence of New-type Fertilizer on Nutrient Accumulation Characteristics of Chinese Cabbage and Yellow Soil Enzyme Activity [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 142-152. |
[14] | NI Zhi-hua, LI Jing, LIAO Jiao, XU Xiao-biao. Status and Prospect of Rhizosphere Micro-ecology of Fruit Trees [J]. , 2010, 12(4): 34-38. |
[15] | WU Xin-jia, WANG Hong, ZHANG Ai-jun, ZHANG Rui-fang, ZHOU Da-mai. Effect of Different Fertilizer Treatments on Nutrient and Enzymatic Activity of Soil in River Ancient Channel [J]. , 2009, 11(6): 118-122. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||