Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 129-137.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0589
• ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH • Previous Articles
Chunyan LI1(), Qian LIANG1(
), Chengxiang GAO1, Zongsuo LIANG2, Fang WANGA1
Received:
2023-08-08
Accepted:
2023-12-18
Online:
2024-12-15
Published:
2024-12-17
Contact:
Qian LIANG
李春燕1(), 梁倩1(
), 高成香1, 梁宗锁2, 王芳1
通讯作者:
梁倩
作者简介:
李春燕E-mail:1602252527@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Chunyan LI, Qian LIANG, Chengxiang GAO, Zongsuo LIANG, Fang WANGA. Study on Insecticidal Activity Constituents and Mechanism of Artemisia annua Against Mythimna separate[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(12): 129-137.
李春燕, 梁倩, 高成香, 梁宗锁, 王芳. 黄花蒿对粘虫杀虫活性成分及机制研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(12): 129-137.
馏分 Fraction | 处理时间Treatment time/d | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
1 | 4.0±2.5 i | 4.0±2.5 j | 4.0±2.5 n | 4.0±2.5 m |
2 | 32.0±2.0 d | 36.0±2.5 e | 36.0±2.5 d | 36.0±2.5 e |
3 | 32.0±2.0 d | 36.0±2.5 e | 36.0±2.5 d | 36.0±2.5 e |
4 | 4.0±2.5 i | 10.0±0.0 i | 10.0±0.0 l | 10.0±0.0 l |
5 | 18.0±2.0 g | 32.0±3.7 f | 38.0±0.2 d | 56.0±2.5 d |
6 | 28.0±2.0 e | 78.0±2.0 b | 78.0±2.0 b | 78.0±2.0 b |
7 | 46.0±2.5 c | 60.0±0.0 d | 60.0±0.0 c | 70.0±0.0 c |
8 | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a |
9 | 66.0±2.5 b | 72.0±2.0 c | 76.0±2.5 b | 76.0±2.5 b |
10 | 6.0±2.5 h | 10.0±0.0 i | 16.0±4.0 j | 20.0±5.5 h |
11 | 4.0±2.5 i | 10.0±0.0 i | 12.0±2.0 k | 14.0±2.5 j |
12 | 12.0±2.0 g | 20.0±0.0 g | 20.0±0.0 i | 24.0±2.5 g |
13 | 2.0±2.0 i | 10.0±0.0 i | 12.0±2.0 k | 12.0±2.0 k |
14 | 34.0±2.5 d | 42.0±2.0 e | 42.0±2.0 d | 42.0±2.0 e |
15 | 34.0±2.5 d | 36.0±2.5 e | 38.0±2.0 d | 40.0±0.0 e |
16 | 2.0±2.0 i | 8.0±2.0 j | 8.0±2.0 m | 8.0±2.0 l |
17 | 12.0±2.0 g | 18.0±2.0 g | 20.0±0.0 i | 20.0±0.0 h |
18 | 12.0±2.0 g | 16.0±2.5 h | 18.0±2.0 i | 18.0±2.0 i |
19 | 28.0±2.0 e | 32.0±2.0 f | 36.0±2.5 d | 36.0±2.5 e |
20 | 16.0±2.5 g | 18.0±2.0 g | 18.0±2.0 i | 18.0±2.0 i |
21 | 4.0±2.5 i | 6.0±2.5 j | 8.0±2.0 m | 8.0±2.0 l |
22 | 36.0±2.5 d | 40.0±0.0 e | 40.0±0.0 d | 40.0±0.0 e |
23 | 14.0±2.5 g | 22.0±2.0 g | 26.0±2.5 g | 26.0±2.5 g |
24 | 18.0±2.0 g | 22.0±2.0 g | 24.0±2.5 h | 24.0±2.5 g |
25 | 18.0±2.0 g | 24.0±2.5 g | 30.0±0.0 f | 30.0±0.0 f |
26 | 26.0±4.0 f | 32.0±2.0 f | 34.0±2.5 e | 38.0±2.0 e |
27 | 6.0±2.5 h | 6.0±2.5 j | 10.0±0.0 | 10.0±0.0 l |
Table 1 Corrected mortality of 27 fractons from A. annua against M. separatain
馏分 Fraction | 处理时间Treatment time/d | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
1 | 4.0±2.5 i | 4.0±2.5 j | 4.0±2.5 n | 4.0±2.5 m |
2 | 32.0±2.0 d | 36.0±2.5 e | 36.0±2.5 d | 36.0±2.5 e |
3 | 32.0±2.0 d | 36.0±2.5 e | 36.0±2.5 d | 36.0±2.5 e |
4 | 4.0±2.5 i | 10.0±0.0 i | 10.0±0.0 l | 10.0±0.0 l |
5 | 18.0±2.0 g | 32.0±3.7 f | 38.0±0.2 d | 56.0±2.5 d |
6 | 28.0±2.0 e | 78.0±2.0 b | 78.0±2.0 b | 78.0±2.0 b |
7 | 46.0±2.5 c | 60.0±0.0 d | 60.0±0.0 c | 70.0±0.0 c |
8 | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a | 100.0±0.0 a |
9 | 66.0±2.5 b | 72.0±2.0 c | 76.0±2.5 b | 76.0±2.5 b |
10 | 6.0±2.5 h | 10.0±0.0 i | 16.0±4.0 j | 20.0±5.5 h |
11 | 4.0±2.5 i | 10.0±0.0 i | 12.0±2.0 k | 14.0±2.5 j |
12 | 12.0±2.0 g | 20.0±0.0 g | 20.0±0.0 i | 24.0±2.5 g |
13 | 2.0±2.0 i | 10.0±0.0 i | 12.0±2.0 k | 12.0±2.0 k |
14 | 34.0±2.5 d | 42.0±2.0 e | 42.0±2.0 d | 42.0±2.0 e |
15 | 34.0±2.5 d | 36.0±2.5 e | 38.0±2.0 d | 40.0±0.0 e |
16 | 2.0±2.0 i | 8.0±2.0 j | 8.0±2.0 m | 8.0±2.0 l |
17 | 12.0±2.0 g | 18.0±2.0 g | 20.0±0.0 i | 20.0±0.0 h |
18 | 12.0±2.0 g | 16.0±2.5 h | 18.0±2.0 i | 18.0±2.0 i |
19 | 28.0±2.0 e | 32.0±2.0 f | 36.0±2.5 d | 36.0±2.5 e |
20 | 16.0±2.5 g | 18.0±2.0 g | 18.0±2.0 i | 18.0±2.0 i |
21 | 4.0±2.5 i | 6.0±2.5 j | 8.0±2.0 m | 8.0±2.0 l |
22 | 36.0±2.5 d | 40.0±0.0 e | 40.0±0.0 d | 40.0±0.0 e |
23 | 14.0±2.5 g | 22.0±2.0 g | 26.0±2.5 g | 26.0±2.5 g |
24 | 18.0±2.0 g | 22.0±2.0 g | 24.0±2.5 h | 24.0±2.5 g |
25 | 18.0±2.0 g | 24.0±2.5 g | 30.0±0.0 f | 30.0±0.0 f |
26 | 26.0±4.0 f | 32.0±2.0 f | 34.0±2.5 e | 38.0±2.0 e |
27 | 6.0±2.5 h | 6.0±2.5 j | 10.0±0.0 | 10.0±0.0 l |
序号 No. | 保留时间 Retention time/min | 化合物 Compound | 相对含量 Relative content/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 8.7 | 十三烷Tridecane | 7.9 |
2 | 10.3 | 丁香酚Eugenol | 1.4 |
3 | 15.3 | 4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 72.8 |
4 | 16.6 | 石竹烯氧化物Caryophyllene oxide | 3.6 |
5 | 17.9 | 9,10-脱氢环异龙胆烯 9,10-dehydro-cycloisolongifolene | 1.9 |
6 | 23.4 | 6,10,14-三甲基-2-十五烷酮 6,10,14-trimethyl-2-pentadecanone | 1.0 |
7 | 30.9 | 亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 2.4 |
8 | 31.0 | 亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 3.1 |
Table 2 Chemical composition of fraction 8
序号 No. | 保留时间 Retention time/min | 化合物 Compound | 相对含量 Relative content/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 8.7 | 十三烷Tridecane | 7.9 |
2 | 10.3 | 丁香酚Eugenol | 1.4 |
3 | 15.3 | 4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 72.8 |
4 | 16.6 | 石竹烯氧化物Caryophyllene oxide | 3.6 |
5 | 17.9 | 9,10-脱氢环异龙胆烯 9,10-dehydro-cycloisolongifolene | 1.9 |
6 | 23.4 | 6,10,14-三甲基-2-十五烷酮 6,10,14-trimethyl-2-pentadecanone | 1.0 |
7 | 30.9 | 亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 2.4 |
8 | 31.0 | 亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 3.1 |
处理时间/d Treatment time | 化合物 Compound | 半数致死浓度 LC50/(mg∙mL-1) | 95%置信区间 95% CI | 斜率 Slope | 卡方 χ2 | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 十三烷Tridecane | 10.0 d | 8.6~15.6 | 1.8±0.2 | 3.6 | 0.3 |
4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 9.8 c | 8.1~12.9 | 2.2±0.2 | 4.1 | 0.3 | |
石竹烯氧化物 Caryophyllene oxide | 34.6 e | 19.4~108.6 | 1.4±0.3 | 2.6 | 0.5 | |
亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 6.6 b | 4.9~10.1 | 3.5±0.3 | 8.4 | 0.0 | |
亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 4.6 a | 2.4~16.6 | 2.2±0.2 | 22.1 | 0.0 | |
3 | 十三烷 Tridecane | 9.8 d | 7.5~14.2 | 1.5±0.2 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 5.8 b | 4.8~7.4 | 1.7±0.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | |
石竹烯氧化物 Caryophyllene oxide | 33.6 e | 18.0~113.4 | 1.1±0.2 | 0.5 | 0.9 | |
亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 6.4 c | 4.4~12.2 | 2.5±0.2 | 9.4 | 0.0 | |
亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 3.1 a | 1.6~7.5 | 1.8±0.2 | 15.8 | 0.0 | |
5 | 十三烷 Tridecane | 9.3 e | 7.1~13.5 | 1.4±0.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 2.6 b | 0.2~79.2 | 1.1±0.1 | 15.2 | 0.0 | |
石竹烯氧化物 Caryophyllene oxide | 8.8 d | 4.6~61.3 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | |
亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 5.5 c | 3.6~10.6 | 2.1±0.2 | 9.0 | 0.0 | |
亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 2.0 a | 1.2~3.2 | 1.7±0.2 | 8.1 | 0.0 | |
7 | 十三烷 Tridecane | 7.9 e | 6.2~10.7 | 1.5±0.2 | 2.3 | 0.5 |
4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 2.5 b | 0.0~9 134 638.4 | 1.1±0.1 | 17.8 | 0.0 | |
石竹烯氧化物 Caryophyllene oxide | 3.6 c | 1.8~13.0 | 0.4±0.1 | 0.31 | 1.0 | |
亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 5.4 d | 3.7~9.6 | 2.1±0.2 | 7.2 | 0.1 | |
亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 1.5 a | 1.2~1.8 | 1.6±0.2 | 4.6 | 0.2 |
Table 3 Contact toxicity of five compounds against M. separatain
处理时间/d Treatment time | 化合物 Compound | 半数致死浓度 LC50/(mg∙mL-1) | 95%置信区间 95% CI | 斜率 Slope | 卡方 χ2 | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 十三烷Tridecane | 10.0 d | 8.6~15.6 | 1.8±0.2 | 3.6 | 0.3 |
4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 9.8 c | 8.1~12.9 | 2.2±0.2 | 4.1 | 0.3 | |
石竹烯氧化物 Caryophyllene oxide | 34.6 e | 19.4~108.6 | 1.4±0.3 | 2.6 | 0.5 | |
亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 6.6 b | 4.9~10.1 | 3.5±0.3 | 8.4 | 0.0 | |
亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 4.6 a | 2.4~16.6 | 2.2±0.2 | 22.1 | 0.0 | |
3 | 十三烷 Tridecane | 9.8 d | 7.5~14.2 | 1.5±0.2 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 5.8 b | 4.8~7.4 | 1.7±0.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | |
石竹烯氧化物 Caryophyllene oxide | 33.6 e | 18.0~113.4 | 1.1±0.2 | 0.5 | 0.9 | |
亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 6.4 c | 4.4~12.2 | 2.5±0.2 | 9.4 | 0.0 | |
亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 3.1 a | 1.6~7.5 | 1.8±0.2 | 15.8 | 0.0 | |
5 | 十三烷 Tridecane | 9.3 e | 7.1~13.5 | 1.4±0.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 2.6 b | 0.2~79.2 | 1.1±0.1 | 15.2 | 0.0 | |
石竹烯氧化物 Caryophyllene oxide | 8.8 d | 4.6~61.3 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | |
亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 5.5 c | 3.6~10.6 | 2.1±0.2 | 9.0 | 0.0 | |
亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 2.0 a | 1.2~3.2 | 1.7±0.2 | 8.1 | 0.0 | |
7 | 十三烷 Tridecane | 7.9 e | 6.2~10.7 | 1.5±0.2 | 2.3 | 0.5 |
4-喹啉甲醛 4-quinolinecarboxaldehyde | 2.5 b | 0.0~9 134 638.4 | 1.1±0.1 | 17.8 | 0.0 | |
石竹烯氧化物 Caryophyllene oxide | 3.6 c | 1.8~13.0 | 0.4±0.1 | 0.31 | 1.0 | |
亚油酸乙酯 Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 5.4 d | 3.7~9.6 | 2.1±0.2 | 7.2 | 0.1 | |
亚麻酸乙酯 Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 1.5 a | 1.2~1.8 | 1.6±0.2 | 4.6 | 0.2 |
Fig. 2 Activity of target enzymes and metabolic enzymes against M. separatain under different treatmentsNote:Different Greece letters indicate significant differences between different treatment groups of same treatment time at P<0.05 level; different English letters indicate significant differences between different treatment times of same treatment at P<0.05 level.
1 | 赵玉玉,李伯辽,李梅梅,等.粘虫对高效氯氰菊酯抗性机制的初步研究[J].应用昆虫学报,2018,55(5):857-864. |
ZHAO Y Y, LI B L, LI M M, et al.. Preliminary research on the resistance mechanism of Mythimna separata to beta-cypermethrin [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol., 2018, 55 (5):857-864. | |
2 | LI H, LIU F F, FU L Q, et al.. Identification of 35 c-type lectins in the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Walker) [J/OL]. Insects, 2021, 12(6):559 [2023-07-10]. . |
3 | 江幸福,张蕾,程云霞,等.我国粘虫发生危害新特点及趋势分析[J].应用昆虫学报,2014,51(6):1444-1449. |
JIANG X F, ZHANG L, CHENG Y X, et al.. Novel features occurrence trends and economic impact of the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Walker) in China [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol., 2014, 51(6):1444-1449. | |
4 | 王娟,孔勇,李伯辽,等.5种杀虫剂对粘虫不同发育阶段的室内毒力[J].西北农业学报,2016,25(7):1097-1102. |
WANG J, KONG Y, LI B L, et al.. Indoor toxicity determination of five kinds of insecticides on Mythimna separata (Walker) at different developmental stages [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2016, 25(7):1097-1102. | |
5 | YAN Y, LIU Q K, ZANG X, et al.. Resistance-gene-directed discovery of a natural-product herbicide with a new mode of action [J]. Nature, 2018, 559:415-418. |
6 | 李晓维,程江辉,韩海斌,等. 植物次生代谢物质对蓟马的行为调控作用[J].昆虫学报,2022, 65(9):1222-1246. |
LI X W, CHENG J H, HAN H B, et al.. Behavioral manipulation of the plant secondary metabolites to thrips and their application in thrips management [J]. Acta Entomol. Sin., 2022, 65(9):1222-1246. | |
7 | 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志[M].北京:科学出版社,1991:1062. |
8 | 李云寿,邹华英,唐绍宗,等.14种菊科植物提取物对菜青虫的杀虫活性[J].华东昆虫学报,2000,9(2):99-101. |
LI Y S, ZOU H Y, TANG S Z, et al.. Insecticidal activity of extracts from fourteen compositae plants against larvae of cabbage white butterfly Pieris rapae L. [J]. Entomol. J. East China, 2000, 9(2):99-101. | |
9 | MAGGI M E, MANGEAUD A, CARPINELLA M C, et al.. Laboratory evaluation of Artemisia annua L. extract and artemisinin activity against Epilachna paenulata and Spodoptera eridania [J]. J. Chem. Ecol., 2005, 31(7):1527-1536. |
10 | DEB M, KUMAR D. Bioactivity and efficacy of essential oils extracted from Artemisia annua against Tribolium casteneum(Herbst.1797)(Coleoptera:Tenebrionidae): an eco-friendly approach [J/OL]. Ecotox. Environ. Safe., 2019, 189:109988 [2023-07-10]. . |
11 | 王振吉,杨申明,沈慧,等.黄花蒿提取物对菜蚜的杀虫活性研究[J].西部林业科学,2014,43(4):136-139. |
WANG Z J, YANG S M, SHEN H, et al.. Bioassay of insecticidal effect of extract from Artemisia annua on Lipaphis erysimi [J]. J. West Chin. For. Sci., 2014, 43(4):136-139. | |
12 | 张永强,丁伟,赵志模,等.黄花蒿提取物对朱砂叶螨生物活性的研究[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(3):720-726. |
ZHANG Y Q, DING W, ZHAO Z M, et al.. Studies on acarcidal bioactivities of the extracts from Artemisia annua L. against Tetranychus cinnabarinus Bois. (Acari: Tetranychidae) [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2008, 41(3):720-726. | |
13 | 朱芬,雷朝亮,王健.黄花蒿粗提物对几种害虫拒食性的初步研究[J].昆虫天敌,2003,5(1):16-19. |
ZHU F, LEI C L, WANG J. Acti-feedant activity of crude extract of Artemisia annua. on some insect pests [J]. Nat. Enemies Insects, 2003, 25(1):16-19. | |
14 | BEDINI S, FLAMINI G, COSCI F, et al.. Artemisia spp. essential oils against the disease-carrying blowfly Calliphora vomitoria [J]. Parasite Vector, 2017, 10(1):1-10. |
15 | 程昉,邵亚洲,杨盈盈,等.黄花蒿挥发油对赤拟谷盗成虫和幼虫的生物活性研究[J].中国粮油学报,2020,35(11):119-124. |
CHENG F, SHAO Y Z, YANG Y Y, et al.. Biological activity of Artemisia annua essential oil against adults and larvae of Tribolium castaneum [J]. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc., 2020, 35(11):119-124. | |
16 | TRIPATHI A K, PRAJAPATI V, AGGARWAL K K, et al.. Toxicity, feeding deterrence, and effect of activity of 1,8-cineole from Artemisia annua on progeny production of Tribolium castanaeum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) [J]. J. Econ. Entomol., 2001, 94(4):979-983. |
17 | 李春燕,高成香,梁倩.黄花蒿对粘虫的杀虫活性研究[J].现代园艺,2023,46(13):4-9. |
LI C Y, GAO C X, LIANG Q. Study on insecticidal activity of Artemisia annua against M. separata [J]. Mod. Hortic., 2023, 46 (13): 4-9. | |
18 | 张新瑞,胡冠芳,刘敏艳,等.红蓼提取物杀虫活性及其对粘虫的作用方式[J].草地学报,2009,17(3):377-382. |
ZHANG X R, HU G F, LIU M Y, et al.. Insecticidal activity of extracts from Polygonum orientale L. and their actionways against Mythimna separate walker [J]. Acta Agric. Sin., 2009, 17(3):377-382. | |
19 | ZHU X Z, SUN M X, ZHANG Z W, et al.. Design synthesis and insecticidal activities of 4-propargyloxybenzene sulfonamide derivatives substituted with amino acids [J]. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res., 2023 25(4):379-386. |
20 | LI Y K, WEI J Q, FANG J M, et al.. Insecticidal activity of four lignans isolated from Phryma leptostachya [J/OL]. Molecules, 2019, 24:1976 [2023-07-10]. . |
21 | 於祥,陈娅芳,张艳,等.欧芹酚甲醚腙类衍生物的设计合成及抗乙酰胆碱酯酶活性研究[J].化学研究与应用,2023,35(1):91-97. |
YU X, CHEN Y F, ZHANG Y, et al.. Synthesis and anti-acetylcholinesterase evaluation of osthole esters [J]. Chem. Res. Appl., 2023, 35(1):91-97. | |
22 | 陈宇鹏.桔小实蝇不同蛹色品系的抗药性机制[D].广州:华南农业大学,2019. |
CHEN Y P. Insecticide resistance mechanism of pupa strains with different coloration of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) [D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2019. | |
23 | SHEN G M, DOU W, NIU J Z, et al.. Transcriptome analysis of the oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis) [J/OL]. PLoS One, 2011, 6 (12): e29127 [2023-07-10]. . |
24 | YANG S Y, WU H H, XIE J C, et al.. Depressed performance and detoxification enzyme activities of Helicoverpa armigera fed with conventional cotton foliage subjected to methyl jasmonate exposure [J]. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 2013, 147(2):186-195. |
25 | 凌斯全.Itol A对褐飞虱的生理影响及作用机理的初步研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2017. |
LIN S Q. Preliminary study on physiological effect and insecticidal mechanism of Itol a against brown planthopper Nilaparvat alugens (Stal) [D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2017. | |
26 | 陈义娟.香樟叶提取物中杀螨活性物质的分离鉴定及作用机理研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2017. |
CHEN Y J. Isolation, identificantion and mechanism of the acaricidal compound from Cinnamomum camphora against Tetranychus cinnabarinus [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2017. | |
27 | 王召,彭舒,孟立霞.噻虫嗪对鲫鱼的急性毒性和抗氧化酶及乙酰胆碱酯酶活性的影响[J].水产科学,2020,39(6):922-927. |
WANG Z, PENG S, MENG L X. Acute toxicity of thiamethoxam and activities of antioxidant enzymes and acetylcholinesterase in juvenile crucian carp Carassius auratus [J]. Fisheries Sci., 2020, 39(6):922-927. |
[1] | Jun TIE, Jie ZHAO, Lu ZHENG, Lifeng WU, Bowen HONG. Application of Improved YOLOv5 Model in Citrus Recognition in Natural Environment [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 111-120. |
[2] | Bing LI, Xiumin ZHU, Dai LI, Junxia DU. Active Ingredients and Action Mechanism of Agricultural Plant Jiaosu [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 156-165. |
[3] | Wenjing MO, Hongsen CHEN, Fangze GUI, Ciqing HONG, Xinkai CAI, Xiong GUAN, Xiaohong PAN. Inhibition Mechanism of Water Extract from Spent Mushroom Substrateagainst Phytophthora infestans in potatoes [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 129-137. |
[4] | Suilin ZHANG, Yang LI, Yan LI, Yunqi ZHANG, Jianxun QI, Zhixia HOU. Research Progress on Harmful Characteristics and Mechanism of Walnut Late Frost [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 18-26. |
[5] | Mingbo LI, Yule LIU, Zhimin MU, Junwang GUO, Yong WEI, Dongyue REN, Jishen JIA, Zezhong WEI, Yuhong LI. Tomato Fruit Recognition Based on YOLOX-L-TN Model [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 97-105. |
[6] | Chen CHEN, Dawei CHENG, Lan LI, Hong GU, Xizhi GUO, Ming LI, Jinyong CHEN. Research Progress on Mechanism of Brassinosteroids Regulating Plant Salt Tolerance [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 1-12. |
[7] | Yu MIAO, Jie WANG, Yaoyao ZHAO, Lijia ZHANG, Meijun LIU. Study on Recovery Characteristics of Photosynthesis in Alfalfa Leaves After Low Temperature Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 80-89. |
[8] | Kun SHI, Zhi WANG, Zhao SHI. Practice and Thinking for the Globalization of China’s Agricultural Science and Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(11): 1-6. |
[9] | Dejun ZHANG, Xiaoming ZHANG, Di WU, Shuyun LIN, Taihua ZHANG, Weiping XU. Simulation of Pepper Cleaning Based on DEM-CFD Coupling [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 87-96. |
[10] | Liting CHEN, Yuanyuan YAN. Investigation of Regulatory Mechanism of Floral Integrators in Upland Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 11-21. |
[11] | Pan LIU, Shan GAO, Haoyu LI, Yi WANG, Baozhong YIN, Jinkao GUO, Wenchao ZHEN. Effects of Row Space Reduction and Plant Space Expansion on Tillers Number in Wheat and Its Physiological Mechanism [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 32-44. |
[12] | Yangyang CAI, Xiuping TAO, Tong LI, Bin SHANG, Jianchao SONG, Lu LIU. Preparation and Application of Natural Polymer Flocculants [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 165-172. |
[13] | Changzheng WU, Wenxuan PU, Song SHENG, Yucheng XIANG, Weiqin YANG, Wenrui LI, Pingjun HUANG, Laihua LIU. Research Advance on Molecular Physiological Mechanisms of the Effect of Suboptimal Low Temperatures on Plant Growth and Nitrogen Nutrition [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 16-25. |
[14] | Zhaoli AN, Dongqun YANG. Innovative Mechanism and Model of Cambodia-China Tropical Eco-agriculture Cooperation Demonstration Zone [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 1-8. |
[15] | Tingting SHI, Yulan LIAO, Xuyou PENG, Chenyu YUAN. Design and Optimization of Single Row In-line Cassava Planter [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 115-122. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||