Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9): 204-214.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0230
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Shibei TAN1(), Dietram Samson MKAPA1,2, Shenglin LI3, Jingen XI1, Weihuai WU1, Helong CHEN1, Xing HUANG1, Yanqiong LIANG1, Kexian YI1,4, Jinlong ZHENG1(
)
Received:
2024-03-25
Accepted:
2024-08-02
Online:
2025-09-15
Published:
2025-09-24
Contact:
Jinlong ZHENG
谭施北1(), MKAPA Dietram Samson1,2, 李升林3, 习金根1, 吴伟怀1, 陈河龙1, 黄兴1, 梁艳琼1, 易克贤1,4, 郑金龙1(
)
通讯作者:
郑金龙
作者简介:
谭施北E-mail: tanshibei915@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Shibei TAN, Dietram Samson MKAPA, Shenglin LI, Jingen XI, Weihuai WU, Helong CHEN, Xing HUANG, Yanqiong LIANG, Kexian YI, Jinlong ZHENG. Effects of Adding Microbial Inoculants and Lime on Fermentation and Nutrient Content of Sisal Waste[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 204-214.
谭施北, MKAPA Dietram Samson, 李升林, 习金根, 吴伟怀, 陈河龙, 黄兴, 梁艳琼, 易克贤, 郑金龙. 添加菌剂和石灰对剑麻渣腐解及养分含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(9): 204-214.
处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | ||||||||||
颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | 颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | 颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | 颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | 颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | |||||
NCK | 黄 Yellow | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 褐 Brown | 泥腥 Earthy | ||||
NB | 褐 Brown | 泥腥 Earthy | 褐 Brown | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄 Yellow | 清香 Fragrant | 黄褐Tawny | 清香 Fragrant | 黄褐Tawny | 清香 Fragrant | ||||
NL | 黄 Yellow | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | ||||
NBL | 黄 Yellow | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 清香 Fragrant | 黄褐Tawny | 清香 Fragrant | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | ||||
WCK | 褐 Brown | 清香 Fragrant | 褐 Brown | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | ||||
WB | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭 Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | ||||
WL | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 褐 Brown | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | ||||
WBL | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭 Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness |
Table 1 Colors and smell of sisal waste fermentation products under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | ||||||||||
颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | 颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | 颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | 颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | 颜色 Color | 气味 Smell | |||||
NCK | 黄 Yellow | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 褐 Brown | 泥腥 Earthy | ||||
NB | 褐 Brown | 泥腥 Earthy | 褐 Brown | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄 Yellow | 清香 Fragrant | 黄褐Tawny | 清香 Fragrant | 黄褐Tawny | 清香 Fragrant | ||||
NL | 黄 Yellow | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | ||||
NBL | 黄 Yellow | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 清香 Fragrant | 黄褐Tawny | 清香 Fragrant | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | ||||
WCK | 褐 Brown | 清香 Fragrant | 褐 Brown | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | ||||
WB | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭 Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | ||||
WL | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 褐 Brown | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | ||||
WBL | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭 Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄褐Tawny | 泥腥 Earthy | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness | 黄 Yellow | 腐臭Rancidness |
处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | 平均 Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | ||
NCK | 17.6±8.7 ab | 17.3±14.9 ab | 2.7±2.5 bc | 0.0±0.0 b | 0.0±0.0 b | 7.5±5.0 b |
NB | 13.3±3.8 b | 13.1±0.8 ab | 23.1±9.2 a | 23.9±10.6 a | 30.6±7.3 a | 21.1±1.5 a |
NL | 18.9±4.0 ab | 14.3±9.7 ab | 1.0±0.7 bc | 3.2±0.2 b | 0.0±0.0 b | 7.7±2.9 bc |
NBL | 22.6±10.0 a | 33.1±27.2 a | 6.9±6.2 b | 22.3±6.8 a | 0.0±0.0 b | 17.0±7.8 a |
WCK | 0.0±0.0 c | 4.1±3.8 b | 0.0±0.0c | 0.3±0.1 b | 7.0±2.6 b | 2.3±1.1 cd |
WB | 0.0±0.0 c | 0.0±0.0 b | 0.0±0.0 c | 0.0±0.0 b | 1.8±1.3 b | 0.4±0.3 d |
WL | 0.0±0.0 c | 0.6±0.1 b | 0.4±0.2 bc | 0.3±0.1b | 2.0±0.7 b | 0.6±0.2 d |
WBL | 0.0±0.0 c | 2.4±1.4 b | 0.4±0.1 bc | 0.1±0.0 b | 3.6±1.6 b | 1.3±0.3 cd |
Table 2 Germination index of the hydrolysateof sisal residue under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | 平均 Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | ||
NCK | 17.6±8.7 ab | 17.3±14.9 ab | 2.7±2.5 bc | 0.0±0.0 b | 0.0±0.0 b | 7.5±5.0 b |
NB | 13.3±3.8 b | 13.1±0.8 ab | 23.1±9.2 a | 23.9±10.6 a | 30.6±7.3 a | 21.1±1.5 a |
NL | 18.9±4.0 ab | 14.3±9.7 ab | 1.0±0.7 bc | 3.2±0.2 b | 0.0±0.0 b | 7.7±2.9 bc |
NBL | 22.6±10.0 a | 33.1±27.2 a | 6.9±6.2 b | 22.3±6.8 a | 0.0±0.0 b | 17.0±7.8 a |
WCK | 0.0±0.0 c | 4.1±3.8 b | 0.0±0.0c | 0.3±0.1 b | 7.0±2.6 b | 2.3±1.1 cd |
WB | 0.0±0.0 c | 0.0±0.0 b | 0.0±0.0 c | 0.0±0.0 b | 1.8±1.3 b | 0.4±0.3 d |
WL | 0.0±0.0 c | 0.6±0.1 b | 0.4±0.2 bc | 0.3±0.1b | 2.0±0.7 b | 0.6±0.2 d |
WBL | 0.0±0.0 c | 2.4±1.4 b | 0.4±0.1 bc | 0.1±0.0 b | 3.6±1.6 b | 1.3±0.3 cd |
处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | 平均 Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | ||
NCK | 7.8±0.6 a | 7.4±0.0 b | 8.3±0.2 a | 8.5±0.1 a | 8.9±0.1 a | 8.2±0.6 a |
NB | 7.4±0.2 a | 7.7±0.1 a | 7.9±0.1 a | 8.1±0.2 a | 8.8±0.1 ab | 8.0±0.5 ab |
NL | 8.0±0.1 a | 7.4±0.3 b | 8.1±0.1 a | 8.5±0.3 a | 8.8±0.2 ab | 8.1±0.5 a |
NBL | 7.7±0.0 a | 7.4±0.0 b | 8.2±0.1 a | 8.4±0.1 a | 8.9±0.0 a | 8.1±0.5 a |
WCK | 5.5±0.1 b | 7.1±0.1 d | 6.6±1.2 b | 7.6±0.0 b | 8.3±0.3 bc | 7.0±1.1 cd |
WB | 5.2±0.1 b | 5.0±0.1 e | 7.3±0.0 ab | 5.4±0.1 c | 7.9±0.1 c | 6.1±1.3 d |
WL | 5.8±0.2 b | 7.2±0.0 cd | 7.4±0.1 ab | 7.5±0.1 b | 8.0±0.1 c | 7.2±0.7 bc |
WBL | 5.6±0.0 b | 7.3±0.1 bc | 7.2±0.1 ab | 7.6±0.1 b | 8.0±0.1 c | 7.1±0.8 bc |
Table 3 pH of hydrolysateof sisal residue under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | 平均 Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | ||
NCK | 7.8±0.6 a | 7.4±0.0 b | 8.3±0.2 a | 8.5±0.1 a | 8.9±0.1 a | 8.2±0.6 a |
NB | 7.4±0.2 a | 7.7±0.1 a | 7.9±0.1 a | 8.1±0.2 a | 8.8±0.1 ab | 8.0±0.5 ab |
NL | 8.0±0.1 a | 7.4±0.3 b | 8.1±0.1 a | 8.5±0.3 a | 8.8±0.2 ab | 8.1±0.5 a |
NBL | 7.7±0.0 a | 7.4±0.0 b | 8.2±0.1 a | 8.4±0.1 a | 8.9±0.0 a | 8.1±0.5 a |
WCK | 5.5±0.1 b | 7.1±0.1 d | 6.6±1.2 b | 7.6±0.0 b | 8.3±0.3 bc | 7.0±1.1 cd |
WB | 5.2±0.1 b | 5.0±0.1 e | 7.3±0.0 ab | 5.4±0.1 c | 7.9±0.1 c | 6.1±1.3 d |
WL | 5.8±0.2 b | 7.2±0.0 cd | 7.4±0.1 ab | 7.5±0.1 b | 8.0±0.1 c | 7.2±0.7 bc |
WBL | 5.6±0.0 b | 7.3±0.1 bc | 7.2±0.1 ab | 7.6±0.1 b | 8.0±0.1 c | 7.1±0.8 bc |
养分指标 Nutrient index | 处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | 平均 Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | |||
全氮 Total nitrogen | NCK | 18.7±3.7 a | 18.5±1.7 a | 16.9±1.1 ab | 18.2±1.2 abc | 15.4±0.9 bc | 17.5±2.1 a |
NB | 18.0±2.9 a | 18.0±1.8 ab | 18.4±0.4 ab | 18.7±0.4 abc | 14.7±1.0 cd | 17.6±2.0 a | |
NL | 16.5±2.7 a | 17.7±0.8 abc | 17.6±3.2 ab | 16.6±0.5 c | 14.2±0.1 cd | 16.7±2.1 ab | |
NBL | 15.7±0.3 ab | 18.8±0.8 a | 18.1±1.5 a | 17.8±0.7 abc | 13.5±0.0 d | 16.8±2.2 ab | |
WCK | 14.4±0.2 ab | 18.0±0.8 ab | 18.9±1.5 a | 19.5±1.4 a | 16.3±1.4 ab | 17.4±2.2 a | |
WB | 11.3±0.6 b | 17.1±0.2 abc | 15.1±1.1 b | 17.3±1.9 bc | 17.5±0.9 a | 15.7±2.6 b | |
WL | 14.0±0.7 ab | 15.7±1.4 c | 17.3±1.1 ab | 18.4±0.5 abc | 17.5±0.2 a | 16.6±1.8 ab | |
WBL | 13.1±0.2 ab | 16.1±0.1 bc | 17.7±1.5 ab | 18.4±1.4 ab | 15.9±1.6 ab | 16.3±2.2 ab | |
全磷 Total phosphorus | NCK | 2.9±0.3 ab | 3.1±0.1 ab | 3.5±0.0 a | 3.8±0.3 a | 3.6±0.2 a | 3.4±0.4 a |
NB | 3.7±1.6 a | 3.3±0.4 a | 3.3±0.2 ab | 3.8±0.1 a | 3.3±0.3 abc | 3.5±0.7 a | |
NL | 2.8±0.3 ab | 2.9±0.2 bc | 3.2±0.1 ab | 3.6±0.2 ab | 3.6±0.0 a | 3.2±0.4 ab | |
NBL | 2.8±0.2 ab | 3.1±0.2 ab | 3.2±0.1 ab | 3.7±0.1 a | 3.4±0.0 ab | 3.2±0.3 a | |
WCK | 2.1±0.1 b | 2.4±0.2 d | 2.6±0.6 c | 3.4±0.1 b | 3.0±0.1 cd | 2.7±0.5 c | |
WB | 1.8±0.2 b | 2.0±0.1 e | 2.0±0.2 d | 2.5±0.3 c | 3.1±0.2 bcd | 2.3±0.5 d | |
WL | 2.2±0.3 b | 2.5±0.1 cd | 3.0±0.1 abc | 3.3±0.1 b | 3.1±0.3 cd | 2.8±0.5 c | |
WBL | 2.1±0.3 b | 2.6±0.2 cd | 2.8±0.4 bc | 3.5±0.1 ab | 2.9±0.2 d | 2.9±0.5 bc | |
全钾 Total potassium | NCK | 1.5±0.1 bc | 4.1±0.5 ab | 2.6±0.1 a | 3.4±0.1 a | 3.0±0.2 b | 2.9±0.9 ab |
NB | 1.6±0.4 bc | 3.7±0.2 bc | 2.9±0.4 a | 3.3±0.3 ab | 3.0±0.0 b | 2.9±0.8 a | |
NL | 2.6±0.2 ab | 4.3±0.1 a | 2.9±0.1 a | 3.5±0.2 a | 3.3±0.3 a | 3.3±0.7 a | |
NBL | 2.3±0.8 abc | 3.7±0.2 bc | 2.7±0.3 a | 3.2±0.3 ab | 3.1±0.0 ab | 3.0±0.6 ab | |
WCK | 3.3±1.9 a | 3.1±0.3 d | 2.9±0.3 a | 2.8±0.0 b | 2.5±0.1 c | 2.9±0.8 a | |
WB | 2.5±1.7 abc | 3.2±0.5 cd | 2.8±0.1 a | 3.1±0.1 ab | 2.6±0.0 c | 2.8±0.7 ab | |
WL | 4.0±0.4 a | 3.1±0.2 d | 2.9±0.1 a | 2.9±0.3 ab | 2.7±0.1 c | 3.1±0.5 ab | |
WBL | 0.9±0.2 c | 3.7±0.1 bc | 2.8±0.2 a | 2.7±0.2 b | 2.6±0.1 c | 2.5±1.0 b |
Table 4 Total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium contents of sisal waste fermentation solid product under different treatments
养分指标 Nutrient index | 处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | 平均 Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | |||
全氮 Total nitrogen | NCK | 18.7±3.7 a | 18.5±1.7 a | 16.9±1.1 ab | 18.2±1.2 abc | 15.4±0.9 bc | 17.5±2.1 a |
NB | 18.0±2.9 a | 18.0±1.8 ab | 18.4±0.4 ab | 18.7±0.4 abc | 14.7±1.0 cd | 17.6±2.0 a | |
NL | 16.5±2.7 a | 17.7±0.8 abc | 17.6±3.2 ab | 16.6±0.5 c | 14.2±0.1 cd | 16.7±2.1 ab | |
NBL | 15.7±0.3 ab | 18.8±0.8 a | 18.1±1.5 a | 17.8±0.7 abc | 13.5±0.0 d | 16.8±2.2 ab | |
WCK | 14.4±0.2 ab | 18.0±0.8 ab | 18.9±1.5 a | 19.5±1.4 a | 16.3±1.4 ab | 17.4±2.2 a | |
WB | 11.3±0.6 b | 17.1±0.2 abc | 15.1±1.1 b | 17.3±1.9 bc | 17.5±0.9 a | 15.7±2.6 b | |
WL | 14.0±0.7 ab | 15.7±1.4 c | 17.3±1.1 ab | 18.4±0.5 abc | 17.5±0.2 a | 16.6±1.8 ab | |
WBL | 13.1±0.2 ab | 16.1±0.1 bc | 17.7±1.5 ab | 18.4±1.4 ab | 15.9±1.6 ab | 16.3±2.2 ab | |
全磷 Total phosphorus | NCK | 2.9±0.3 ab | 3.1±0.1 ab | 3.5±0.0 a | 3.8±0.3 a | 3.6±0.2 a | 3.4±0.4 a |
NB | 3.7±1.6 a | 3.3±0.4 a | 3.3±0.2 ab | 3.8±0.1 a | 3.3±0.3 abc | 3.5±0.7 a | |
NL | 2.8±0.3 ab | 2.9±0.2 bc | 3.2±0.1 ab | 3.6±0.2 ab | 3.6±0.0 a | 3.2±0.4 ab | |
NBL | 2.8±0.2 ab | 3.1±0.2 ab | 3.2±0.1 ab | 3.7±0.1 a | 3.4±0.0 ab | 3.2±0.3 a | |
WCK | 2.1±0.1 b | 2.4±0.2 d | 2.6±0.6 c | 3.4±0.1 b | 3.0±0.1 cd | 2.7±0.5 c | |
WB | 1.8±0.2 b | 2.0±0.1 e | 2.0±0.2 d | 2.5±0.3 c | 3.1±0.2 bcd | 2.3±0.5 d | |
WL | 2.2±0.3 b | 2.5±0.1 cd | 3.0±0.1 abc | 3.3±0.1 b | 3.1±0.3 cd | 2.8±0.5 c | |
WBL | 2.1±0.3 b | 2.6±0.2 cd | 2.8±0.4 bc | 3.5±0.1 ab | 2.9±0.2 d | 2.9±0.5 bc | |
全钾 Total potassium | NCK | 1.5±0.1 bc | 4.1±0.5 ab | 2.6±0.1 a | 3.4±0.1 a | 3.0±0.2 b | 2.9±0.9 ab |
NB | 1.6±0.4 bc | 3.7±0.2 bc | 2.9±0.4 a | 3.3±0.3 ab | 3.0±0.0 b | 2.9±0.8 a | |
NL | 2.6±0.2 ab | 4.3±0.1 a | 2.9±0.1 a | 3.5±0.2 a | 3.3±0.3 a | 3.3±0.7 a | |
NBL | 2.3±0.8 abc | 3.7±0.2 bc | 2.7±0.3 a | 3.2±0.3 ab | 3.1±0.0 ab | 3.0±0.6 ab | |
WCK | 3.3±1.9 a | 3.1±0.3 d | 2.9±0.3 a | 2.8±0.0 b | 2.5±0.1 c | 2.9±0.8 a | |
WB | 2.5±1.7 abc | 3.2±0.5 cd | 2.8±0.1 a | 3.1±0.1 ab | 2.6±0.0 c | 2.8±0.7 ab | |
WL | 4.0±0.4 a | 3.1±0.2 d | 2.9±0.1 a | 2.9±0.3 ab | 2.7±0.1 c | 3.1±0.5 ab | |
WBL | 0.9±0.2 c | 3.7±0.1 bc | 2.8±0.2 a | 2.7±0.2 b | 2.6±0.1 c | 2.5±1.0 b |
养分指标 Nutrient content | 处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | 平均 Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | |||
全氮 Total nitrogen | NCK | 67.5±6.8 bc | 45.5±34.6 b | 114.9±18.4 a | 172.1±94.5 ab | 233.3±82.9 a | 132.5±29.6 a |
NB | 100.0±27.2 a | 215.4±93.5 a | 39.9±3.8 c | 101.9±51.2 b | 122.5±8.8 de | 115.9±23.7 a | |
NL | 48.2±6.1 c | 92.5±47.2 b | 110.5±22.0 ab | 186.0±78.4 ab | 80.2±48.5 e | 105.2±25.1 a | |
NBL | 64.5±3.7 bc | 59.2±11.6 b | 82.4±9.2 abc | 115.0±91.8 b | 311.2±0.0 a | 130.9±31.0 a | |
WCK | 72.9±8.7 abc | 69.0±1.4 b | 52.5±24.1 bc | 157.9±46.9 ab | 146.8±7.5 cd | 96.5±24.5 a | |
WB | 84.1±6.9 ab | 97.0±24.5 b | 83.4±56.1 abc | 228.2±33.5 a | 211.5±31.4 b | 140.8±23.9 a | |
WL | 74.4±8.7 bc | 98.1±17.9 b | 43.2±12.6 c | 136.2±14.5 ab | 180.0±32.8 bc | 106.4±3.2 a | |
WBL | 61.4±5.0 c | 93.6±6.8 b | 69.7±16.1 bc | 105.3±52.0 b | 180.8±24.1 bc | 102.1±6.2 a | |
全磷 Total phosphorus | NCK | 8.2±5.6 b | 19.9±6.7 bc | 14.6±1.4 b | 12.4±4.1 b | 6.5±0.6 b | 12.4±1.4 b |
NB | 9.1±2.1 b | 15.4±3.3 c | 16.0±2.5 b | 17.4±8.6 b | 5.0±0.8 b | 12.6±1.2 b | |
NL | 6.9±1.8 b | 18.1±3.9 bc | 15.2±1.1 b | 8.7±2.7 b | 6.8±3.5 ab | 11.4±1.0 b | |
NBL | 5.9±1.5 b | 17.4±0.9 c | 14.5±1.7 b | 8.7±5.3 b | 7.0±3.8 ab | 11.2±1.0 b | |
WCK | 16.7±0.7 b | 30.3±6.6 b | 17.9±3.2 b | 12.0±4.3 b | 6.5±0.8 b | 16.6±2.2 b | |
WB | 52.8±24.4 a | 153.5±5.1 a | 60.1±24.8 a | 136.3±11.2 a | 11.6±3.3 a | 84.5±7.3 a | |
WL | 12.8±4.8 b | 23.7±2.7 bc | 14.8±1.7 b | 10.1±4.4 b | 8.5±0.8 ab | 14±1.1 b | |
WBL | 17.6±4.0 b | 18.5±2.0 bc | 16.1±1.5 b | 15.5±16.4 b | 8.3±1.7 ab | 15.2±3.6 b | |
全钾 Total potassium | NCK | 0.59±0.01 c | 0.69±0.05 bc | 0.71±0.05 b | 0.74±0.03 ab | 0.80±0.09 ab | 0.71±0.08 a |
NB | 0.58±0.03 c | 0.84±0.01 a | 0.66±0.08 b | 0.78±0.03 ab | 0.85±0.06 a | 0.74±0.12 a | |
NL | 0.65±0.02 bc | 0.74±0.04 bc | 0.83±0.02 a | 0.85±0.11 a | 0.74±0.05 b | 0.76±0.09 a | |
NBL | 0.61±0.04 bc | 0.69±0.04 bc | 0.73±0.04 ab | 0.78±0.08 ab | 0.77±0.01 b | 0.71±0.07 a | |
WCK | 0.69±0.02 ab | 0.65±0.04 c | 0.66±0.01 b | 0.70±0.02 ab | 0.76±0.00 b | 0.68±0.04 a | |
WB | 0.67±0.01 ab | 0.67±0.02 bc | 0.67±0.01 b | 0.67±0.03 ab | 0.73±0.04 b | 0.68±0.03 a | |
WL | 0.75±0.00 a | 0.75±0.01 ab | 0.73±0.03 ab | 0.71±0.01 ab | 0.73±0.04 b | 0.74±0.02 a | |
WBL | 0.68±0.05 ab | 0.72±0.02 bc | 0.66±0.02 b | 0.60±0.13 b | 0.73±0.04 b | 0.68±0.07 a |
Table 5 Total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium contents in the hydrolysate under different treatments (mg·kg-1)
养分指标 Nutrient content | 处理 Treatment | 发酵时间Fermentation time | 平均 Average | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 d | 50 d | 75 d | 100 d | 125 d | |||
全氮 Total nitrogen | NCK | 67.5±6.8 bc | 45.5±34.6 b | 114.9±18.4 a | 172.1±94.5 ab | 233.3±82.9 a | 132.5±29.6 a |
NB | 100.0±27.2 a | 215.4±93.5 a | 39.9±3.8 c | 101.9±51.2 b | 122.5±8.8 de | 115.9±23.7 a | |
NL | 48.2±6.1 c | 92.5±47.2 b | 110.5±22.0 ab | 186.0±78.4 ab | 80.2±48.5 e | 105.2±25.1 a | |
NBL | 64.5±3.7 bc | 59.2±11.6 b | 82.4±9.2 abc | 115.0±91.8 b | 311.2±0.0 a | 130.9±31.0 a | |
WCK | 72.9±8.7 abc | 69.0±1.4 b | 52.5±24.1 bc | 157.9±46.9 ab | 146.8±7.5 cd | 96.5±24.5 a | |
WB | 84.1±6.9 ab | 97.0±24.5 b | 83.4±56.1 abc | 228.2±33.5 a | 211.5±31.4 b | 140.8±23.9 a | |
WL | 74.4±8.7 bc | 98.1±17.9 b | 43.2±12.6 c | 136.2±14.5 ab | 180.0±32.8 bc | 106.4±3.2 a | |
WBL | 61.4±5.0 c | 93.6±6.8 b | 69.7±16.1 bc | 105.3±52.0 b | 180.8±24.1 bc | 102.1±6.2 a | |
全磷 Total phosphorus | NCK | 8.2±5.6 b | 19.9±6.7 bc | 14.6±1.4 b | 12.4±4.1 b | 6.5±0.6 b | 12.4±1.4 b |
NB | 9.1±2.1 b | 15.4±3.3 c | 16.0±2.5 b | 17.4±8.6 b | 5.0±0.8 b | 12.6±1.2 b | |
NL | 6.9±1.8 b | 18.1±3.9 bc | 15.2±1.1 b | 8.7±2.7 b | 6.8±3.5 ab | 11.4±1.0 b | |
NBL | 5.9±1.5 b | 17.4±0.9 c | 14.5±1.7 b | 8.7±5.3 b | 7.0±3.8 ab | 11.2±1.0 b | |
WCK | 16.7±0.7 b | 30.3±6.6 b | 17.9±3.2 b | 12.0±4.3 b | 6.5±0.8 b | 16.6±2.2 b | |
WB | 52.8±24.4 a | 153.5±5.1 a | 60.1±24.8 a | 136.3±11.2 a | 11.6±3.3 a | 84.5±7.3 a | |
WL | 12.8±4.8 b | 23.7±2.7 bc | 14.8±1.7 b | 10.1±4.4 b | 8.5±0.8 ab | 14±1.1 b | |
WBL | 17.6±4.0 b | 18.5±2.0 bc | 16.1±1.5 b | 15.5±16.4 b | 8.3±1.7 ab | 15.2±3.6 b | |
全钾 Total potassium | NCK | 0.59±0.01 c | 0.69±0.05 bc | 0.71±0.05 b | 0.74±0.03 ab | 0.80±0.09 ab | 0.71±0.08 a |
NB | 0.58±0.03 c | 0.84±0.01 a | 0.66±0.08 b | 0.78±0.03 ab | 0.85±0.06 a | 0.74±0.12 a | |
NL | 0.65±0.02 bc | 0.74±0.04 bc | 0.83±0.02 a | 0.85±0.11 a | 0.74±0.05 b | 0.76±0.09 a | |
NBL | 0.61±0.04 bc | 0.69±0.04 bc | 0.73±0.04 ab | 0.78±0.08 ab | 0.77±0.01 b | 0.71±0.07 a | |
WCK | 0.69±0.02 ab | 0.65±0.04 c | 0.66±0.01 b | 0.70±0.02 ab | 0.76±0.00 b | 0.68±0.04 a | |
WB | 0.67±0.01 ab | 0.67±0.02 bc | 0.67±0.01 b | 0.67±0.03 ab | 0.73±0.04 b | 0.68±0.03 a | |
WL | 0.75±0.00 a | 0.75±0.01 ab | 0.73±0.03 ab | 0.71±0.01 ab | 0.73±0.04 b | 0.74±0.02 a | |
WBL | 0.68±0.05 ab | 0.72±0.02 bc | 0.66±0.02 b | 0.60±0.13 b | 0.73±0.04 b | 0.68±0.07 a |
处理 Treatment | 质量损失率 Mass loss rate | 氮损失率 N loss rate | 磷损失率 P loss rate | 钾损失率 K loss rate |
---|---|---|---|---|
NCK | 43.1±1.7 a | 42.2±4.7 ab | 25.2±3.0 ab | 80.0±1.6 ab |
NB | 41.8±0.6 a | 43.6±3.7 ab | 28.4±5.1 ab | 79.6±0.4 abc |
NL | 37.8±1.4 ab | 42.1±0.9 abc | 17.3±1.7 b | 75.9±2.7 c |
NBL | 39.1±0.0 ab | 46.0±0.0 a | 23.4±0.0 ab | 78.1±0.0 bc |
WCK | 40.2±4.5 ab | 34.2±11.5 abc | 32.5±1.1 ab | 82.2±2.0 a |
WB | 39.5±1.2 ab | 30.4±2.4 bc | 29.5±2.7 ab | 82.0±0.7 a |
WL | 35.0±2.9 b | 25.1±4.2 c | 25.8±9.1 ab | 79.3±1.7 abc |
WBL | 37.2±2.3 ab | 34.1±8.9 abc | 32.9±5.1 a | 81.1±0.2 ab |
Table 6 Loss rates of mass, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of sisal waste under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 质量损失率 Mass loss rate | 氮损失率 N loss rate | 磷损失率 P loss rate | 钾损失率 K loss rate |
---|---|---|---|---|
NCK | 43.1±1.7 a | 42.2±4.7 ab | 25.2±3.0 ab | 80.0±1.6 ab |
NB | 41.8±0.6 a | 43.6±3.7 ab | 28.4±5.1 ab | 79.6±0.4 abc |
NL | 37.8±1.4 ab | 42.1±0.9 abc | 17.3±1.7 b | 75.9±2.7 c |
NBL | 39.1±0.0 ab | 46.0±0.0 a | 23.4±0.0 ab | 78.1±0.0 bc |
WCK | 40.2±4.5 ab | 34.2±11.5 abc | 32.5±1.1 ab | 82.2±2.0 a |
WB | 39.5±1.2 ab | 30.4±2.4 bc | 29.5±2.7 ab | 82.0±0.7 a |
WL | 35.0±2.9 b | 25.1±4.2 c | 25.8±9.1 ab | 79.3±1.7 abc |
WBL | 37.2±2.3 ab | 34.1±8.9 abc | 32.9±5.1 a | 81.1±0.2 ab |
处理 Treatment | 叶数 Leaf number | 叶长 Leaf length/cm | 叶宽 Leaf width/cm | 茎叶鲜重 Fresh weight of stems and leaves/g | 根鲜重 Fresh weight of roots/g | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | CK1 | 11±2 ab | 24.4±1.4 bcd | 2.2±0.1 b | 63.0±4.3 abc | 2.6±1.2 ab |
发酵液浇灌 Irrigating hydrolysat | NB | 10±3 ab | 26.2±0.7 bc | 2.2±0.1 b | 49.4±16.8 c | 1.7±0.6 ab |
NBL | 9±2 ab | 22.3±1.8 d | 2.2±0.3 b | 45.2±6.0 c | 1.4±0.2 b | |
WB | 8±3 b | 27.4±2.6 ab | 2.4±0.1 ab | 54.3±13.8 c | 2.2±1.0 ab | |
WBL | 11±2 ab | 23.5±2.4 cd | 2.2±0.2 b | 56.5±7.4 bc | 1.6±0.2 ab | |
固态产物基施 Solid product base application | NB | 12±2 a | 25.8±2.1 bc | 2.5±0.2 ab | 73.0±3.5 ab | 2.0±0.8 ab |
NBL | 10±1 ab | 26.2±1.9 bc | 2.4±0.4 b | 60.2±11.6 abc | 1.6±0.2 ab | |
WB | 10±1 ab | 26.7±1.3 b | 2.5±0.3 ab | 75.6±14.0 a | 1.8±0.1 ab | |
WBL | 9±1 ab | 29.8±1.3 a | 2.8±0.2 a | 73.1±4.5 ab | 2.7±0.8 a |
Table 7 Sisal seeding growth index under different sisal waste fermentation product application
处理 Treatment | 叶数 Leaf number | 叶长 Leaf length/cm | 叶宽 Leaf width/cm | 茎叶鲜重 Fresh weight of stems and leaves/g | 根鲜重 Fresh weight of roots/g | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 | CK1 | 11±2 ab | 24.4±1.4 bcd | 2.2±0.1 b | 63.0±4.3 abc | 2.6±1.2 ab |
发酵液浇灌 Irrigating hydrolysat | NB | 10±3 ab | 26.2±0.7 bc | 2.2±0.1 b | 49.4±16.8 c | 1.7±0.6 ab |
NBL | 9±2 ab | 22.3±1.8 d | 2.2±0.3 b | 45.2±6.0 c | 1.4±0.2 b | |
WB | 8±3 b | 27.4±2.6 ab | 2.4±0.1 ab | 54.3±13.8 c | 2.2±1.0 ab | |
WBL | 11±2 ab | 23.5±2.4 cd | 2.2±0.2 b | 56.5±7.4 bc | 1.6±0.2 ab | |
固态产物基施 Solid product base application | NB | 12±2 a | 25.8±2.1 bc | 2.5±0.2 ab | 73.0±3.5 ab | 2.0±0.8 ab |
NBL | 10±1 ab | 26.2±1.9 bc | 2.4±0.4 b | 60.2±11.6 abc | 1.6±0.2 ab | |
WB | 10±1 ab | 26.7±1.3 b | 2.5±0.3 ab | 75.6±14.0 a | 1.8±0.1 ab | |
WBL | 9±1 ab | 29.8±1.3 a | 2.8±0.2 a | 73.1±4.5 ab | 2.7±0.8 a |
[1] | 孙娟,钟鑫,郑红裕,等.我国剑麻产业概况及对策研究[J].中国热带农业,2020(5):27-32. |
SUN J, ZHONG X, ZHENG H Y, et al.. Overview and strategy research of sisal industry in China [J].China Trop. Agric.,2020(5):27-32. | |
[2] | VUORINNE I, HEISKANEN J, PELLIKKA P K E. Assessing leaf biomass of agave sisalana using sentinel-2 vegetation indices [J/OL]. Remote Sens., 2021, 13(2): 233 [2024-02-26]. . |
[3] | REN G S, YAO B, REN M, et al.. Utilization of natural sisal fibers to manufacture eco-friendly ultra-high performance concrete with low autogenous shrinkage [J/OL]. J. Clean. Prod., 2022(15): 332 [2024-02-26]. . |
[4] | 冯伟丽, 康兴隆, 柳妍, 等. 层层自组装改性剑麻纤维填充聚丙烯复合材料性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35 (10): 10211-10215. |
FENG W L, KANG X L, LIU Y, et al.. Properties of polypropylene composites filled with layer-by-layer assembly modified sisal fiber [J]. Materials Rep., 2021, 35 (10): 10211-10215. | |
[5] | 李雯倩.剑麻渣中纤维素的分离与纤维素纳米纤丝的制备[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2021. |
LI W Q. Isolation of cellulose from sisal waste and preparation of cellulose nanofibrils [D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2021. | |
[6] | 吴永和. 剑麻中低产田改造措施与效果[J]. 广西热作科技, 1989(4): 36-39. |
[7] | 姜繁昌.剑麻纤维的性能研究[J].中国麻业,2003,25(5):228-234. |
JIANG F C.A study on properties of sisal fibre [J].Plant Fiber Sci. China, 2003,25(5):228-234. | |
[8] | 王俊,覃佑康,曹志恒,等.剑麻皂素工业化制备技术研究进展[J].广西科学,2020,27(2):182-187. |
WANG J, QIN Y K, CAO Z H, et al.. Research progress on industrial preparation technology of tigo-genin [J]. Guangxi Sci., 2020,27(2):182-187. | |
[9] | 吴希锴.大型湿地植物和茶皂素对剩余污泥好氧堆肥的影响研究 [D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2022. |
WU X K. Efect of large wetl and plants and tea saponin on excess sludge aerobic composting [D]. Changsha: Changsha University of Science and Technology, 2022. | |
[10] | 高凤磊, 黄标, 黎陛成, 等. 发酵剑麻渣对黄花鸡生长性能、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2022, 45(1): 44-47. |
GAO F L, HUANG B, LI B C, et al.. Effect of fermented sisal residue on growth performance,slaughter and meat quality of Huanghua chicken [J]. Feed Res., 2022, 45(1): 44-47. | |
[11] | 覃旭, 黄显雅, 杨祥燕, 等. 剑麻麻渣腐熟剂筛选及其腐熟效应研究 [J].农业研究与应用, 2021, 34(3): 48-53. |
QIN X, HUANG X Y, YANG X Y, et al.. Selection and effects of different decomposing agent of sisal residue [J]. Agric. Res. Appl., 2021, 34(3): 48-53. | |
[12] | 陈德荣, 卢玉文, 陈雪凤, 等. 利用工业废弃料剑麻渣栽培食用菌夏秀玲技术研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(15):88-89. |
[13] | 张小芳,陈莉莎,陈伟南.剑麻皂苷元的研究现状[J].当代化工研究,2021(14):34-35. |
ZHANG X F, CHEN L S, CHEN W N. Research status of sisal sapogenin [J]. Mod. Chem. Res., 2021(14):34-35. | |
[14] | 黄富宇.广西农垦剑麻产业发展现状及对策[J].热带农业工程,2010,34(4):105-106. |
HUANG F Y. Production and developmental measures for sisal in Guangxi [J]. Trop. Agric. Eng., 2010,34(4):105-106. | |
[15] | 付程, 郭占斌, 付义琦, 等. 好氧堆肥技术与厌氧发酵技术研究进展[J]. 热带农业工程, 2023, 47 (5):165-169. |
FU C, GUO Z B, FU Y Q, et al.. Research progress on aerobic composting technology and anaerobic fermentation technology [J].Trop. Agric. Eng., 2023, 47(5):165-169. | |
[16] | MENG Q X, YANG W, MEN M Q, et al.. Microbial community succession and response to environmental variables during cow manure and corn straw composting [J/OL]. Front. Microbiol., 2019, 10 :529 [2024-02-26]. . |
[17] | 蔡瑞,徐春城.堆肥用微生物及其效果研究进展[J].中国土壤与肥料,2019(5):1-7. |
CAI R, XU C C. Research progress on microorganisms commonly used in composting and their effects [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2019(5):1-7. | |
[18] | 高贵明. 剑麻施用石灰效果简报[J].中国麻作, 1989 (2): 49. |
[19] | 翟修彩.不同化学添加剂对秸秆腐解产物的影响及其应用研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2012. |
ZHAI X C. Study of chemical additives on straw decomposition and the application in red soil [D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012. | |
[20] | 徐鹏翔, 沈玉君, 周海宾, 等. 原料含水率对筒仓式反应器堆肥氮素转化的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(11): 180-188. |
XU P X, SHEN Y J, ZHOU H B, et al.. Effects of the moisture content of raw material on nitrogen transformation during composting in silo reactor [J]. J. Chin. Agric. Univ., 2021, 26(11): 180-188. | |
[21] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999: 302-315. |
[22] | 邹雨坤, 李光义, 李勤奋, 等. 不同还田方式下香蕉茎秆的腐解及养分释放特征[J]. 天津农业科学, 2014, 20(10): 60-64. |
ZOU Y K, LI G Y, LI Q F, et al.. Characteristics of decomposing and nutrients releasing of banana stalk under different ways returned to field [J]. Tianjin Agric. Sci., 2014, 20(10): 60-64. | |
[23] | 罗鑫源. 鸡粪好氧/厌氧发酵过程对腐植酸类物质组成与结构的影响[D]. 济南: 齐鲁工业大学, 2024. |
LUO X Y. Effects of aerobic/anaerobic fermentation of chicken manure on the composition and structure of humic acids [D]. Jinan: Qilu University of Technology, 2024. | |
[24] | 李丹阳, 马若男, 刘燕, 等. 含水率对羊粪堆肥腐熟度及污染气体排放的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(20): 254-262. |
LI D Y, MA R N, LIU Y, et al.. Effects of moisture content on maturity and pollution gas emissions during sheep manure composting [J]. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2020, 36(20): 254-262. | |
[25] | 周亚文, 张宇航, 沈玉君, 等. 初始含水率对人粪污好氧堆肥腐熟及微生物群落结构变化的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2022, 16(12): 4108-4120. |
ZHOU Y W, ZHANG Y H, SHEN Y J, et al.. Effect of the initial moisture content on the maturity extent and the microbial community structure of the aerobic compost with human excrement [J]. Chin. J. Environ. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 4108-4120. | |
[26] | 吴伟霞, 席北斗, 黄彩红, 等. 有机固废堆肥中产臭及除臭技术的微生物作用机制研究进展[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(10): 2486-2496. |
WU W X, XI B D, HUANG C H, et al.. Review on microbial mechanism of odor generation and deodorization technology during organic solid waste composting [J]. Res. Environ. Sci., 2021, 34 (10): 2486-2496. | |
[27] | 胖是,王燕,廖新俤,等.通风量对蛋鸡粪堆肥氨气排放的影响[J].中国家禽,2015,37(15):23-30. |
PANG S, WANG Y, LIAO X D,et al.. Effect of ventilation on ammonia emission in layer manure composting [J].China Poult., 2015,37(15):23-30. | |
[28] | 赵旭, 王文丽, 李娟. 玉米秸秆调节牛粪含水率对其腐熟进程及氨气释放量的影响[J].生态科学, 2020, 39(5):179-186. |
ZHAO X, WANG W L, LI J, et al.. Effect of corn stalk regulating moisture content on cow manure compost and ammonia release [J]. Ecol. Sci., 2020, 39(5):179-186. | |
[29] | 魏启航, 冯瑶, 王晓醒, 等. 除臭菌的筛选及其在堆肥中的应用效果[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(13): 2623-2634. |
WEI Q H, FENG Y, WANG X X, et al.. Screening of deodorizing bacteria and tts application in composting [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2024, 57(13): 2623-2634. | |
[30] | GU W J, SUN W, LU Y S, et al.. Effect of Thiobacillus thioparus 1904 and sulphur addition on odour emission during aerobic composting [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2018,249:254-260. |
[31] | 蒋建国,杜伟,殷闽,等.石灰稳定化污泥恶臭物质释放特征研究[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(9):1620-1624. |
JIANG J G, DU W, YIN M, et al.. Release character of offensive odorants produced from lime stabilizing sludge [J].China Environ. Sci., 2012,32(9):1620-1624. | |
[32] | 曹永森. 金霉素和重金属对堆肥过程的影响及添加石灰效果研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2017. |
CAO Y S. Effect of chlortetracycline and heavy metals on swine manure composting process and the impact of lime [D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017. | |
[33] | 赵彬涵,孙宪昀,黄俊,等.微生物在有机固废堆肥中的作用与应用[J].微生物学通报,2021,48(1):223-240. |
ZHAO B H, SUN X Y, HUANG J, et al.. Application and effects of microbial additives in aerobic composting of organic solid wastes: a review [J]. Microbiol. China, 2021,48(1):223-240. | |
[34] | 陈芙蓉, 熊伟仡, 尹娇, 等.微生物菌剂对叶菜废弃物堆肥过程的影响 [J].中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 146-154. |
CHEN F R, XIONG W Y, YIN J, et al.. Effects of microbial agents on leaf vegetable wastes during composting [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2024, 26(3): 146-154. | |
[35] | 薛晶晶,李彦明,常瑞雪,等.厨余与园林废物共堆肥过程氮素转化及损失[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(10):192-197. |
XUE J J, LI Y M, CHANG R X,et al.. Nitrogen transformation and loss during co-composting of kitchen and garden wastes [J].Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2021,37(10):192-197. | |
[36] | 郜斌斌, 王选, 王珏, 等. 化学和黏土矿物钝化剂对牛粪秸秆堆肥磷形态转化的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2019, 35(2): 242-249. |
GAO B B, WANG X, WANG Y, et al.. Effects of chemical and clay mineral additives on phosphorus transformation during cow manure and corn stover composting [J]. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2019, 35(2): 242-249. |
[1] | Jiang WU, Hongsheng CHENG, Jingtao DING, Yujun SHEN, Haibin ZHOU, Wenxiu GUO, Ying ZHANG. Effects of Different Filling Rate and Aeration Technology on Composting Effect of Roller [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(9): 172-180. |
[2] | Kunhong JIANG, Zhenying XU, Zhenzhen GUO, Lin BAI, Xiaoxia HAO, Dongmei JIANG, Shixiu QIU. Principles of Microbial Electrochemical Technology and Its Application in the Recycling of Livestock and Poultry Wastes [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 210-222. |
[3] | Jingwen QIANG, Wanqing WANG, Manyu TANG, Na ZHANG, Shuang WU, Wei HUA, Hengxuan SHAO, Yanling CHENG. Effects of Anaerobic Digestion of Kitchen Waste on Biogas Microorganisms and Environment [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 159-169. |
[4] | Yu ZHANG, Hongbo ZHANG, Yuyu ZHANG, Lijuan CHEN, Mingfang ZHAO, Yun XIA. Study on Anaerobic Digestion of Rose Straw Inoculated with Livestock Manure and Its Microbial Community [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 201-211. |
[5] | Lu MENG, Jingwen FAN, Xinyu SAI, Lusheng ZENG, Xiangyun SONG, Dejie CUI. Effects of Lime on Soil Improvement and Plant Growth in Apple Orchards [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 197-204. |
[6] | Kemeng AN, Lixin ZHAO, Zonglu YAO, Jiadong YU, Zaixing LI, Yali HUANG, Yi LIANG, Ruixia SHEN. Research Progress of High-value Utilization of Straw to Synthesize Medium-chain Fatty Acids [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 198-211. |
[7] | Yan MENG, Wei WANG, Quancai XI, Yi LI, Laisheng CHEN, Zhongping DU, Rui HAN. Effect of Biogas Slurry Pretreatment on Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Straws [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 188-196. |
[8] | Li LIU, Zhongping DU, Yi LI, Laisheng CHEN, Rui HAN. Effect of NaOH Pretreatment on Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Hulless Barley Straw [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 192-200. |
[9] | JIAO Jing, ZHENG Yong, LI Zunxiang, HUANG Xiaohong, DU Jihua, ZHENG Jin. JIAO Jing1,2, ZHENG Yong3*, LI Zunxiang1, HUANG Xiaohong1, DU Jihua1, ZHENG Jin1 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 87-95. |
[10] | XIAO Shengling1, JING Yong1,2, FENG Jing2, SHEN Ruixia2*, ZHAO Lixin2, WANG Quanliang1, ZHANG Ying2. Effect of Wood Biochar on the Methane Production Performance of Anaerobic Fermentation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(1): 128-135. |
[11] | TAN Shibei1, XI Jingen1*, CHEN Helong2, ZHENG Jinlong1, HUANG Xing1, HE Chunping1, WU Weihuai1, LIANG Yanqiong1, ZHANG Shiqing2, GAO Jianming2, LI Rui1, YI Kexian1*. Effect of Microbial Inoculants and Lime Addition on Composting Maturity and Nutrient Content of Sisal Residue [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(2): 166-172. |
[12] | WANG Wei1, ZHENG Dahao1, YANG Chaobo2, LI Yong1, WANG Wei1, LI Xiying1,3*. Isolation of High Efficient Cellulose Decomposing Bacteria and Biological Effects on Straw Degradation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 36-46. |
[13] | FENG Kang1,2, MENG Haibo1,2*, ZHOU Haibin1, SHEN Yujun1,2, WANG Liming2. Research Status and Prospect of Integrated Aerobic Fermentation Equipment [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 63-69. |
[14] | ZHANG Guozhan. Effect of Carbon Source Conditioner on High Temperature Aerobic Compost Fermentation of Cow Manure [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(12): 99-106. |
[15] | ZHOU Wanlai1,2,3, YI Yongjian1, TAN Zhijian1, WANG Hongying1, YANG Yuanru1, YU Wang1, NIU Yanbin1, YI Zhenxie2,3, WANG Chaoyun1*. Compensation Benefits Analysis for Oxygen Supply of Bast Fiber Seedling Film Matted on the Bottom Surface of Seedling Plate [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(11): 79-84. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||