Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 197-204.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0815
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Lu MENG(), Jingwen FAN, Xinyu SAI, Lusheng ZENG(
), Xiangyun SONG, Dejie CUI
Received:
2021-09-16
Accepted:
2022-01-18
Online:
2023-04-01
Published:
2023-06-26
Contact:
Lusheng ZENG
孟璐(), 范敬文, 赛欣娱, 曾路生(
), 宋祥云, 崔德杰
通讯作者:
曾路生
作者简介:
孟璐 E-mail:1005613531@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Lu MENG, Jingwen FAN, Xinyu SAI, Lusheng ZENG, Xiangyun SONG, Dejie CUI. Effects of Lime on Soil Improvement and Plant Growth in Apple Orchards[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 197-204.
孟璐, 范敬文, 赛欣娱, 曾路生, 宋祥云, 崔德杰. 石灰对苹果园土壤改良和植株生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 197-204.
处理 Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | pH | 碱解氮含量 AN content/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷含量 AP content/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量 AK content/ (mg·kg-1) | 有机质含量 OM content/ (g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0—20 | 5.12±0.12 c | 69.56±12.32 b | 21.56±2.98 b | 17.97±11.03 b | 22.82±1.89 ab |
20—40 | 5.65±0.07 b | 57.02±5.82 b | 25.45±1.15 b | 21.30±2.57 ab | 12.01±0.09 b | |
T4500 | 0—20 | 5.65±0.04 b | 97.76±3.49 ab | 28.57±0.66 b | 33.79±3.62 a | 27.67±0.63 a |
20—40 | 5.66±0.04 b | 114.05±7.08 ab | 36.22±1.34 ab | 25.56±4.99 ab | 13.31±0.53 b | |
T6000 | 0—20 | 6.31±0.11 a | 137.32±21.36 a | 32.18±3.67 ab | 30.53±2.46 a | 27.84±2.17 a |
20—40 | 5.77±0.05 b | 104.74±4.03 ab | 36.35±1.08 ab | 18.12±2.90 b | 15.15±1.37 b | |
T7500 | 0—20 | 6.32±0.21 a | 139.65±8.06 a | 43.54±0.81 a | 30.69±5.80 a | 21.06±0.35 ab |
20—40 | 6.01±0.07 a | 150.12±29.69 a | 46.11±3.04 a | 27.36±2.76 ab | 14.83±1.49 b |
Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of orchard soil after lime application
处理 Treatment | 土层 Soil layer/cm | pH | 碱解氮含量 AN content/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷含量 AP content/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾含量 AK content/ (mg·kg-1) | 有机质含量 OM content/ (g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0—20 | 5.12±0.12 c | 69.56±12.32 b | 21.56±2.98 b | 17.97±11.03 b | 22.82±1.89 ab |
20—40 | 5.65±0.07 b | 57.02±5.82 b | 25.45±1.15 b | 21.30±2.57 ab | 12.01±0.09 b | |
T4500 | 0—20 | 5.65±0.04 b | 97.76±3.49 ab | 28.57±0.66 b | 33.79±3.62 a | 27.67±0.63 a |
20—40 | 5.66±0.04 b | 114.05±7.08 ab | 36.22±1.34 ab | 25.56±4.99 ab | 13.31±0.53 b | |
T6000 | 0—20 | 6.31±0.11 a | 137.32±21.36 a | 32.18±3.67 ab | 30.53±2.46 a | 27.84±2.17 a |
20—40 | 5.77±0.05 b | 104.74±4.03 ab | 36.35±1.08 ab | 18.12±2.90 b | 15.15±1.37 b | |
T7500 | 0—20 | 6.32±0.21 a | 139.65±8.06 a | 43.54±0.81 a | 30.69±5.80 a | 21.06±0.35 ab |
20—40 | 6.01±0.07 a | 150.12±29.69 a | 46.11±3.04 a | 27.36±2.76 ab | 14.83±1.49 b |
Fig. 2 Mean weight diameter, geometric mean diameter and fractal dimension of soil under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same index at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Contents of positive ions in soil under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters of same ion indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Contents of anions in soil under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 初始荧光值 Fo | 最大荧光值 Fm | 可变荧光值 Fv | 最大量子产率 Fv / Fm | 性能指数 PIabs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4 153.00±393.95 b | 19 399.33±1 323.66 b | 15 246.33±930.67 b | 0.79±0.01 a | 11.84±2.48 b |
T4500 | 4 651.00±161.36 ab | 20 281.67±1 152.56 ab | 15 630.67±1 088.74 b | 0.77±0.01 a | 12.88±0.17ab |
T6000 | 4 974.33±32.67 a | 20 171.67±611.49 ab | 15 330.67±653.01 b | 0.76±0.03 a | 12.21±0.48 ab |
T7500 | 4 316.00±173.25 ab | 21 057.67±769.59 a | 16 741.67±596.36 a | 0.80±0.00 a | 13.58±0.18 a |
Table 2 Fluorescence values of leaves under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 初始荧光值 Fo | 最大荧光值 Fm | 可变荧光值 Fv | 最大量子产率 Fv / Fm | 性能指数 PIabs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 4 153.00±393.95 b | 19 399.33±1 323.66 b | 15 246.33±930.67 b | 0.79±0.01 a | 11.84±2.48 b |
T4500 | 4 651.00±161.36 ab | 20 281.67±1 152.56 ab | 15 630.67±1 088.74 b | 0.77±0.01 a | 12.88±0.17ab |
T6000 | 4 974.33±32.67 a | 20 171.67±611.49 ab | 15 330.67±653.01 b | 0.76±0.03 a | 12.21±0.48 ab |
T7500 | 4 316.00±173.25 ab | 21 057.67±769.59 a | 16 741.67±596.36 a | 0.80±0.00 a | 13.58±0.18 a |
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 11.73±0.20 b | 2.44±0.05 c | 130.67±0.88 c | 184.00±6.12 b |
T4500 | 18.97±0.15 a | 3.96±0.09 a | 275.00±8.50 b | 240.00±2.52 b |
T6000 | 19.57±0.55 a | 3.17±0.14 b | 388.00±2.08 a | 249.67±11.14 ab |
T7500 | 19.90±0.12 a | 3.38±0.10 b | 384.00±7.23 a | 272.33±6.84 a |
Table 3 Photosynthesis of fruit tree leaves under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 11.73±0.20 b | 2.44±0.05 c | 130.67±0.88 c | 184.00±6.12 b |
T4500 | 18.97±0.15 a | 3.96±0.09 a | 275.00±8.50 b | 240.00±2.52 b |
T6000 | 19.57±0.55 a | 3.17±0.14 b | 388.00±2.08 a | 249.67±11.14 ab |
T7500 | 19.90±0.12 a | 3.38±0.10 b | 384.00±7.23 a | 272.33±6.84 a |
Fig. 5 Contents of N, P and K in leaves under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
1 | 白团辉,李莉,郑先波,等.柱状苹果 Co 基因的筛选与候选基因分析[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(23):4350-4363. |
BAI T H, LI L, ZHENG X B, et al.. Screening and expression analysis of Co candidate genes in columnar apple [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2019, 52(23):4350-4363. | |
2 | 曹风,刘璇,毕金峰,等.不同品种苹果果胶含量及结构差异分析[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(13):2328-2340. |
CAO F, LIU X, BI J F, et al.. Difference analysis of pectin content and structure from various apple cultivars [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2019, 52(13):2328-2340. | |
3 | 刘瑞.山东省苹果产业链纵向协作关系研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2015. |
LIU R. The research of apple industry chain collaboration longitudinal relationship in Shandong province [D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015. | |
4 | 王海云,姜远茂,彭福田,等.胶东苹果园土壤有效养分状况及与产量关系研究[J].山东农业大学学报,2018,39(1):31-38. |
WANG H Y, JIANG Y M, PENG F T, et al.. Study on there relationship between the soil available nutrition and yield in apple orchard of Jiaodong [J]. Shandong Agric.Univ., 2018, 39(1):31-38. | |
5 | 李宗耕,刘惠军,宋丽芬,等.烟台郊区苹果园土壤肥力状况调查[J].安徽农业科学, 2015,43 (28):107-108, 138. |
LI Z G, LIU H J, SONG L F, et al.. Investigation on soil fertility of apple orchard in suburbs of Yantai [J]. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2015, 43(28):107-108, 138. | |
6 | 张北赢,陈天林,王兵.长期施用化肥对土壤质量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(11):182-187. |
ZHANG B Y, CHEN T L, WANG B. Effects of long-term uses of chemical fertilizers on soil quality [J].Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2010, 26(11):182-187. | |
7 | 国艳春,孙显旻,曾路生,等.山东平度市苹果园土壤养分现状调查与评价[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(12):66-70. |
GUO Y C, SUN X M, ZENG L S, et al.. Investigation and evaluation on soil nutrient status of apple orchard in Pingdu city, Shandong province [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2020, 52(12):66-70. | |
8 | 罗绪强,王世杰,张桂玲,等.钙离子浓度对两种蕨类植物光合作用的影响[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(2):258-262. |
LUO X Q, WANG S J, ZHANG G L, et al.. Effects of calcium concentration on photosynthesis characteristics of two fern plants [J]. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 2013, 22(2):258-262. | |
9 | 唐明,向金友,袁茜.酸性土壤施石灰对土壤理化性质、微生物数量及烟叶产质量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2015(12):91-93. |
TANG M, XIANG J Y, YUAN Q. Effects of applying lime on physical and chemical properties,microbial quantities of acid soil and yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2015(12):91-93. | |
10 | 梅旭阳.红壤酸化及石灰改良影响冬小麦根际土壤钾的有效性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(6):1568-1577. |
MEI X Y. The response of soil potassium availability in rhizospheric soil of winter wheat to acidified and limed red soil [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2016, 22(6):1568-1577. | |
11 | 邓小华,黄杰,杨丽丽,等.石灰、绿肥和生物有机肥协同改良酸性土壤并提高烟草生产效益[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(9):1577-1587. |
DENG X H, HUANG J, YANG L L, et al.. The synergistic effect of lime, green manure and bio-organic fertilizer on restoration of acid field and improvement of tobacco production efficiency [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2019, 25(9):1577-1587. | |
12 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:1-495. |
BAO S D. Soil Agrochemical Analysis [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000:1-495. | |
13 | YAMASHITA T, FLESSA H, JOHN B,et al.. Organicmatter in density fractions of water-stable aggregates in silty soils: effect of land use [J]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2006, 38:3222-3234. |
14 | 李贺,刘世琦,王越,等.钙对水培大蒜光合特性和品质的影响[J].园艺学报,2013(6):1169-1177. |
LI H, LIU S Q, WANG Y, et al.. Effects of calcium on photosynthetic characteristics and quality of garlic [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2013(6):1169-1177. | |
15 | 王伟妮,鲁剑巍,鲁明星,等.水田土壤肥力现状及变化规律——以湖北省为例[J].土壤学报,2012,49(2):319-330. |
WANG W N, LU J W, LU M X, et al.. Status quo and variation of soil fertility in paddy field—a case study of Hubei province [J]. Acta Pedol. Sci., 2012, 49(2):319-330. | |
16 | 李玮,郑子成,李廷轩,等.不同植茶年限土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布特征[J].生态学报,2014,34(21):6326-6336. |
LI W, ZHENG Z C, LI T X, et al.. Distribution characteristics of soil aggregates and its organic carbon in different tea plantation age [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2014, 34(21):6326-6336. | |
17 | 张玥琦.添加稻草与生石灰对设施土壤团聚体组成及番茄产量、品质的影响[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2018. |
ZAHNG Y Q. Effects of straw and/or lime addition on soil aggregate composition, tomato yield and quality in greenhouse [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018. | |
18 | 孙晓娥,刘兆普,隆小华.不同供镁水平对两菊芋品种幼苗生物量、光合和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(4):823-829. |
ZHANG X E, LIU Z P, LONG X H. Effects of different levels of magnesium supply on the seedling's growth,photosynthesis, and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of two Helianthus tuberous varieties [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2012, 31(4):823-829. | |
19 | 吴沿友,邢德科,刘莹.植物利用碳酸氢根离子的特征分析[J].地球与环境,2011,39(2):273-277. |
WU Y Y, XING D K, LIU Y. The characteristics of bicarbonate used by plants [J]. Earth Environ., 2011, 39(2):273-277. | |
20 | 陈德伟,汤寓涵,石文波,等.钙调控植物生长发育的进展分析[J].分子植物育种,2019,17(11):3593-36. |
CHEN D W, TANG Y H, SHI W B, et al.. Progress in the regulation of calcium growth and development [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2019, 17(11):3593-3601. |
[1] | Yanjun KE, Yumeng ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Zitao ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Combined with Subsoiling on Farmland Soil Fertility and Crop Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 157-166. |
[2] | Jiangang JIN, Zaifang TIAN, Minna ZHENG, Jiahui KANG. Effect of Different Fertilization Measures on the Diversity of Soil Bacteria Communities in Fed oats (Avena sativa L.) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 152-160. |
[3] | Juxian GUO, Bishan OUYANG, Guihua LI, Mei FU, Wenlong LUO, Shanwei LUO, Meilian LU. Effect of Bio-organic Fertilizers on Quality and Soil of Continuous Crop Chinese Flowering Cabbage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 182-191. |
[4] | Hui YAN. Response Mechanism of Chlorophyll Fluorescence to Low Temperature Stress in Brassica napus L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 58-64. |
[5] | Kaihong XIANG, Xu LYU, Chuanhai SHU, Riqu WUZA, Jinyue ZHANG, Yuemei ZHU, Zhiyuan YANG, Yongjian SUN, Jun MA. Effects of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Precision Hill-direct-seeding Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 149-165. |
[6] | Xiubo XIA, Tao LI, Shoujun CAO, Jiangang YAO, Hongyun WANG, Lili ZHANG. Effect of Liquid Organic Fertilizer Partial Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Bacterial Community in Greenhouse Tomato Root Zone [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 187-196. |
[7] | Xin WANG, Yuxia ZHANG, Weidong CHEN, Congying LIN, Wenhui HOU, Guleng SIRI, Baiming CONG. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing on Yield and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Different Forage Oat Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 170-179. |
[8] | Liangxiang DAI, Guanchu ZHANG, Hong DING, Yang XU, Zhimeng ZHANG. Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Calcium Fertilizer on Peanut Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Structure in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 189-201. |
[9] | Ailin DAI, Yonggang ZHANG, Qiang AI, Xichao TENG, Limin YANG. Effects of Different Light Qualities on Growth, Physiological Characteristics and Flavonoids Accumulation of Epimedium koreanum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 85-92. |
[10] | Zhuwen LIU, Longfei YANG, Maolin LIU, Guotao JIA, Qian YAO, Yiqiong MA, Ting CUI, Xinling YANG, Yang CHEN, Liangkun CHENG. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Nutrients and Inherent Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(11): 190-198. |
[11] | Yu SU, Shaoli HUANG. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Flue-cured Tobacco Photosynthetic Characteristics and Rhizosphere Soil Microorganism [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 164-171. |
[12] | Min LI, Gangtie LI, Hongwu ZHANG, Jiahuan CHEN. Effects of Stubble on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Three Kinds of Protein Mulberry Forest [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 172-182. |
[13] | LIU Li, LIU Jing. Extension Mode and Effect Evaluation of Organic Fertilizer Substituting Chemical Fertilizer Technology#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 13-22. |
[14] | MA Xingdong1, GUO Yehong1*, DU Tao2, LI Meiying3, XU Yingjie1, CHEN Xiaowei1, YAN Zongbang1, YANG Shaojie1, FENG Jinglu1. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Diurnal Variation of Photosynthesis and Yield of Two Lycium Species [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 173-182. |
[15] | HAO Zhenggang, ZHAO Huijun, WEI Yuqing*, ZENG Zhouqi, WANG Zhiheng. Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Sweet Sorghum to Cadmium Stress and Its Cadmium Accumulation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(1): 30-42. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||