Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 193-202.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0960
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xin ZHAO1,2(), Zilong WU1,2, Chao HAN1,2, Hao ZHANG1,2(
), Wei SONG3, Ziyi LI1,2
Received:
2023-12-27
Accepted:
2024-04-22
Online:
2025-05-15
Published:
2025-05-20
Contact:
Hao ZHANG
赵昕1,2(), 吴子龙1,2, 韩超1,2, 张浩1,2(
), 宋炜3, 李子怡1,2
通讯作者:
张浩
作者简介:
赵昕 E-mail: zhaoxinmdj@126.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xin ZHAO, Zilong WU, Chao HAN, Hao ZHANG, Wei SONG, Ziyi LI. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth and Cadmium Enrichment of Setaria viridis Under Cadmium Stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 193-202.
赵昕, 吴子龙, 韩超, 张浩, 宋炜, 李子怡. 丛枝菌根真菌对镉胁迫下狗尾草生长及镉富集的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 193-202.
处理 Treatment | 菌根侵染率 Mycorrhizal infection rate/% | 株高 Plant height/cm | 生物量/(g·盆-1) Biomass/(g·pot-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cd处理前 Before Cd treatment | Cd处理后 After Cd treatment | 地上部 Aboveground | 根 Root | 全株 Whole plant | ||
NM0 | 0.00±.0.00 | 0.00±0.00 d | 41.93±1.12 b | 19.40±0.62 b | 12.77±0.65 b | 32.17±1.26 b |
NM10 | — | 0.00±0.00 d | 41.50±0.80 b | 18.57±0.57 b | 11.87±0.65 bc | 30.43±0.76 bc |
NM30 | — | 0.00±0.00 d | 30.50±1.35 c | 10.47±0.40 d | 8.13±0.40 c | 18.60±0.80 c |
NM50 | — | 0.00±0.00 d | 20.80± 0.56 d | 6.33± 0.06 e | 5.50±0.36 d | 11.83±0.42 d |
AM0 | 43.80±1.87 | 53.70±1.28 a | 53.47±0.78 a | 26.50±1.59 a | 15.83±0.40 a | 42.33±1.96 a |
AM10 | — | 52.60±0.82 a | 52.70±1.73 a | 25.30±1.31 a | 15.63±0.42 a | 40.93±1.42 a |
AM30 | — | 38.80±1.59 b | 40.57±1.19 b | 17.13±0.85 c | 11.23±0.85 b | 28.37±1.68 c |
AM50 | — | 25.40±0.89 c | 31.50±1.11 c | 10.00±0.36 d | 7.90± 0.46 c | 17.90±0.82 c |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉AM×Cd | ** | ** | ns | ** | ns | * |
Table 1 Mycorrhizal infection rate and growth of Setaria viridis under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 菌根侵染率 Mycorrhizal infection rate/% | 株高 Plant height/cm | 生物量/(g·盆-1) Biomass/(g·pot-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cd处理前 Before Cd treatment | Cd处理后 After Cd treatment | 地上部 Aboveground | 根 Root | 全株 Whole plant | ||
NM0 | 0.00±.0.00 | 0.00±0.00 d | 41.93±1.12 b | 19.40±0.62 b | 12.77±0.65 b | 32.17±1.26 b |
NM10 | — | 0.00±0.00 d | 41.50±0.80 b | 18.57±0.57 b | 11.87±0.65 bc | 30.43±0.76 bc |
NM30 | — | 0.00±0.00 d | 30.50±1.35 c | 10.47±0.40 d | 8.13±0.40 c | 18.60±0.80 c |
NM50 | — | 0.00±0.00 d | 20.80± 0.56 d | 6.33± 0.06 e | 5.50±0.36 d | 11.83±0.42 d |
AM0 | 43.80±1.87 | 53.70±1.28 a | 53.47±0.78 a | 26.50±1.59 a | 15.83±0.40 a | 42.33±1.96 a |
AM10 | — | 52.60±0.82 a | 52.70±1.73 a | 25.30±1.31 a | 15.63±0.42 a | 40.93±1.42 a |
AM30 | — | 38.80±1.59 b | 40.57±1.19 b | 17.13±0.85 c | 11.23±0.85 b | 28.37±1.68 c |
AM50 | — | 25.40±0.89 c | 31.50±1.11 c | 10.00±0.36 d | 7.90± 0.46 c | 17.90±0.82 c |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉AM×Cd | ** | ** | ns | ** | ns | * |
处理 Treatment | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | 总叶绿素 Total chlorophyll | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids |
---|---|---|---|---|
NM0 | 1.42±0.02 b | 0.29±0.01 ab | 1.71±0.03 c | 0.56±0.02 b |
NM10 | 1.40±0.02 b | 0.28±0.01 b | 1.68±0.03 c | 0.54±0.01 b |
NM30 | 1.22±0.04 c | 0.21±0.02 d | 1.43±0.05 d | 0.44±0.01 d |
NM50 | 1.00±0.03 d | 0.13±0.02 e | 1.13±0.03 e | 0.36±0.02 e |
AM0 | 1.75±0.02 a | 0.33±0.02 a | 2.08±0.02 a | 0.63±0.02 a |
AM10 | 1.70±0.02 a | 0.31±0.01 ab | 2.01±0.02 b | 0.62±0.01 a |
AM30 | 1.42±0.02 b | 0.26±0.01 c | 1.67±0.03 a | 0.55±0.01 ab |
AM50 | 1.20±0.03 c | 0.19±0.02 d | 1.40±0.04 d | 0.47± 0.01 c |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉 AM×Cd | ** | ns | ** | * |
Table 2 Chlorophyll content of Setaria viridis under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | 总叶绿素 Total chlorophyll | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids |
---|---|---|---|---|
NM0 | 1.42±0.02 b | 0.29±0.01 ab | 1.71±0.03 c | 0.56±0.02 b |
NM10 | 1.40±0.02 b | 0.28±0.01 b | 1.68±0.03 c | 0.54±0.01 b |
NM30 | 1.22±0.04 c | 0.21±0.02 d | 1.43±0.05 d | 0.44±0.01 d |
NM50 | 1.00±0.03 d | 0.13±0.02 e | 1.13±0.03 e | 0.36±0.02 e |
AM0 | 1.75±0.02 a | 0.33±0.02 a | 2.08±0.02 a | 0.63±0.02 a |
AM10 | 1.70±0.02 a | 0.31±0.01 ab | 2.01±0.02 b | 0.62±0.01 a |
AM30 | 1.42±0.02 b | 0.26±0.01 c | 1.67±0.03 a | 0.55±0.01 ab |
AM50 | 1.20±0.03 c | 0.19±0.02 d | 1.40±0.04 d | 0.47± 0.01 c |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉 AM×Cd | ** | ns | ** | * |
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NM0 | 11.00±0.36 b | 1.70±0.04 b | 159.33±1.53 b | 257.33±1.53 d |
NM10 | 10.63±0.15 bc | 1.66±0.03 b | 157.00±3.00 b | 260.67±2.52 d |
NM30 | 9.43±0.50 c | 1.39±0.05 c | 132.33±3.06 c | 273.00±1.00 c |
NM50 | 7.63±0.15 d | 1.06±0.04 d | 104.33±4.16 d | 313.33±4.16 a |
AM0 | 12.97±0.60 a | 1.97±0.06 a | 181.67±6.03 a | 233.67±2.52 d |
AM10 | 12.47±0.55 a | 1.92±0.05 a | 181.33±3.05 a | 238.67±2.08 d |
AM30 | 11.10±0.26 b | 1.69±0.02 b | 153.00±4.00 b | 257.67±4.04 d |
AM50 | 10.13±0.29 bc | 1.41±0.09 c | 131.77±4.73 c | 284.33±6.43 b |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉 AM×Cd | ns | ns | ns | * |
Table 3 Photosynthetic parameter of Setaria viridis under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率 Tr/(mmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NM0 | 11.00±0.36 b | 1.70±0.04 b | 159.33±1.53 b | 257.33±1.53 d |
NM10 | 10.63±0.15 bc | 1.66±0.03 b | 157.00±3.00 b | 260.67±2.52 d |
NM30 | 9.43±0.50 c | 1.39±0.05 c | 132.33±3.06 c | 273.00±1.00 c |
NM50 | 7.63±0.15 d | 1.06±0.04 d | 104.33±4.16 d | 313.33±4.16 a |
AM0 | 12.97±0.60 a | 1.97±0.06 a | 181.67±6.03 a | 233.67±2.52 d |
AM10 | 12.47±0.55 a | 1.92±0.05 a | 181.33±3.05 a | 238.67±2.08 d |
AM30 | 11.10±0.26 b | 1.69±0.02 b | 153.00±4.00 b | 257.67±4.04 d |
AM50 | 10.13±0.29 bc | 1.41±0.09 c | 131.77±4.73 c | 284.33±6.43 b |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉 AM×Cd | ns | ns | ns | * |
处理 Treatment | 表观量子效率 AQY | 暗呼吸速率 Rd/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 最大净光合速率 Pmax/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 光补偿点 LCP/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NM0 | 0.043±0.002 d | 1.367±0.080 c | 20.925±0.124 c | 32.024±0.866 c |
NM10 | 0.041±0.004 d | 1.160±0.066 d | 23.311±0.486 b | 28.162±2.374 cd |
NM30 | 0.040±0.005 d | 1.870±0.088 b | 19.878±0.791 c | 46.591±3.281 b |
NM50 | 0.038±0.003 d | 2.792±0.130 a | 13.325±0.316 d | 74.192±1.520 a |
AM0 | 0.084±0.009 a | 0.788±0.158 e | 31.566±0.778 a | 9.326±0.904 d |
AM10 | 0.079±0.007 a | 0.705±0.066 e | 31.690±0.435 a | 8.966±0.125 d |
AM30 | 0.065±0.005 b | 1.841±0.160 b | 24.448±0.601 b | 28.445±0.683 cd |
AM50 | 0.055±0.002 c | 2.601±0.022 a | 15.512±0.276 e | 47.216±3.385 b |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉 AM×Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Table 4 Parameters of net photosynthetic rate and light response curve of Setaria viridis under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 表观量子效率 AQY | 暗呼吸速率 Rd/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 最大净光合速率 Pmax/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | 光补偿点 LCP/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
NM0 | 0.043±0.002 d | 1.367±0.080 c | 20.925±0.124 c | 32.024±0.866 c |
NM10 | 0.041±0.004 d | 1.160±0.066 d | 23.311±0.486 b | 28.162±2.374 cd |
NM30 | 0.040±0.005 d | 1.870±0.088 b | 19.878±0.791 c | 46.591±3.281 b |
NM50 | 0.038±0.003 d | 2.792±0.130 a | 13.325±0.316 d | 74.192±1.520 a |
AM0 | 0.084±0.009 a | 0.788±0.158 e | 31.566±0.778 a | 9.326±0.904 d |
AM10 | 0.079±0.007 a | 0.705±0.066 e | 31.690±0.435 a | 8.966±0.125 d |
AM30 | 0.065±0.005 b | 1.841±0.160 b | 24.448±0.601 b | 28.445±0.683 cd |
AM50 | 0.055±0.002 c | 2.601±0.022 a | 15.512±0.276 e | 47.216±3.385 b |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉 AM×Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** |
处理 Treatment | 地上部Cd含量 Aboveground Cd content | 根部Cd含量 Cd content in root | 全株Cd含量Cd content in plant | 土壤Cd含量 Cd content in soil | 地上部Cd富集量 Aboveground Cd enrichment/mg | 根部Cd富集量 Root Cd enrichment/mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NM0 | 0.02±0.01 f | 0.06±0.01 g | 0.04±0.00 g | 0.05±0.01 g | 0.45±0.10 h | 0.72±0.05 g |
NM10 | 0.82±0.04 e | 1.05±0.03 f | 0.91± 0.02 f | 0.94±0.02 e | 15.18± 1.22 f | 12.51±1.04 e |
NM30 | 8.51±0.55 c | 10.17±0.04 d | 9.24±0.31 d | 9.41±0.16 c | 89.03±6.57 d | 82.73±3.80 c |
NM50 | 24.64±2.10 a | 35.34±1.09 b | 29.62±1.58 b | 35.00±0.43 a | 156.05±13.20 b | 194.38±14.36 b |
AM0 | 0.03±0.01 f | 0.09±0.01 g | 0.05± 0.01 g | 0.05±0.01 g | 0.88± 0.12 g | 1.37±0.07 f |
AM10 | 0.72±0.04 e | 1.68±0.07 e | 1.09±0.05 e | 0.78±0.04 f | 18.31±1.46 e | 26.23±1.70 d |
AM30 | 6.36±0.16 d | 16.72±0.29 c | 10.46±0.07 c | 7.99±0.08 d | 108.88±2.66 c | 187.90±16.86 b |
AM50 | 18.47± 0.24 b | 49.17±0.51 a | 32.02±0.18 a | 23.61± 0.46 b | 184.69±4.92 a | 388.49± 23.91 a |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉 AM×Cd | ** | ** | ns | ** | ns | ns |
Table 5 Cd enrichment of Setaria viridis under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 地上部Cd含量 Aboveground Cd content | 根部Cd含量 Cd content in root | 全株Cd含量Cd content in plant | 土壤Cd含量 Cd content in soil | 地上部Cd富集量 Aboveground Cd enrichment/mg | 根部Cd富集量 Root Cd enrichment/mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NM0 | 0.02±0.01 f | 0.06±0.01 g | 0.04±0.00 g | 0.05±0.01 g | 0.45±0.10 h | 0.72±0.05 g |
NM10 | 0.82±0.04 e | 1.05±0.03 f | 0.91± 0.02 f | 0.94±0.02 e | 15.18± 1.22 f | 12.51±1.04 e |
NM30 | 8.51±0.55 c | 10.17±0.04 d | 9.24±0.31 d | 9.41±0.16 c | 89.03±6.57 d | 82.73±3.80 c |
NM50 | 24.64±2.10 a | 35.34±1.09 b | 29.62±1.58 b | 35.00±0.43 a | 156.05±13.20 b | 194.38±14.36 b |
AM0 | 0.03±0.01 f | 0.09±0.01 g | 0.05± 0.01 g | 0.05±0.01 g | 0.88± 0.12 g | 1.37±0.07 f |
AM10 | 0.72±0.04 e | 1.68±0.07 e | 1.09±0.05 e | 0.78±0.04 f | 18.31±1.46 e | 26.23±1.70 d |
AM30 | 6.36±0.16 d | 16.72±0.29 c | 10.46±0.07 c | 7.99±0.08 d | 108.88±2.66 c | 187.90±16.86 b |
AM50 | 18.47± 0.24 b | 49.17±0.51 a | 32.02±0.18 a | 23.61± 0.46 b | 184.69±4.92 a | 388.49± 23.91 a |
菌根菌AM | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
镉Cd | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
菌根菌×镉 AM×Cd | ** | ** | ns | ** | ns | ns |
Fig. 2 Effects of AMF on Cd enrichment characteristics in Setaria viridis under Cd stressNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05 level; ** indicates significant at P<0.01 level.
1 | 王雪蓉,梁如玉,王玉龙, 等. 重金属胁迫下丛枝菌根真菌对白茅生长和生理生态特征的影响[J]. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 46(2): 439-448. |
WANG X R, LIANG R Y, WANG Y L, et al.. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and ecophysiological characteristics of Imperata cylindrica under heavy metal stress [J]. J. Shanxi Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2023, 46(2): 439-448. | |
2 | 何红君. 丛枝菌根真菌接种对Cd胁迫下芹菜生长、生理及富集特征的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2020, 45(3): 70-75. |
HE H J. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on the growth, physiology and accumulation characteristics of celery (Apium graveolens L.) under cadmium stress [J]. J. Northeast Agric. Sci.,2020, 45(3): 70-75. | |
3 | VECCHIA F D, ROCCA N L, MORO I, et al.. Morphogenetic, ultra structural and physiological damages suffered by submerged leaves of Elodea canadensis exposed to cadmium [J]. Plant Sci., 2005, 168(2): 329-338. |
4 | EDELSTEIN M, BEN-HUR M. Heavy metals and metalloids: sources, risks and strategies to reduce their accumulation in horticultural crops [J]. Sci. Hortic.,2018, 234(4): 431-444. |
5 | 赖秋羽, 魏树和, 代惠萍, 等. 番茄光合荧光特性及其镉吸收对土壤镉污染的响应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(11): 4737-4742. |
LAI Q Y, WEI S H, DAI H P, et al.. Response of photosynthetic characteristics and fluorescence parameters of tomato to Cd in soil [J]. China Environ. Sci., 2019, 39(11): 4737-4742 | |
6 | 黄蕊, 辛建攀, 田如男. 镉胁迫下大薸生长的变化及镉积累、分布特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2022,41(9): 2033-2042. |
HUANG R, XIN J P, TIAN R N. Growth changes and characteristics of cadmium accumulation and distribution in Pistia stratiotes under cadmium stress [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2022, 41(9): 2033-2042. | |
7 | 徐金玉, 王伟伟, 王惠, 等. 铜污染土壤的生物修复研究进展[J]. 生物工程学报, 2020, 36(3): 471-480. |
XU J Y, WANG W W, WANG H, et al.. Progress in bioremediation of copper-contaminated soils [J]. Chin. J. Biotechnol.,2020, 36(3): 471-480. | |
8 | 李琋, 王雅璇, 罗廷, 等. 利用生物炭负载微生物修复石油烃-镉复合污染土壤[J]. 环境工程学报, 2021, 15 (2): 677-687. |
LI X, WANG Y X, LUO T, et al.. Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-cadmium co-contaminated soil by biochar loaded microorganisms [J]. Chin. J. Environ. Eng.,2021, 15(2): 677-687. | |
9 | GONZÁLEZ-CHÁVEZ M D C A, CARRILLO-GONZÁLEZ R, CUELLAR-SÁNCHEZ A, et al.. Phytoremediation assisted by mycorrhizal fungi of a mexican defunct lead-acid battery recycling site [J]. Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 650: 3134- 3144. |
10 | ZHANG X Y, ZHANG H J, ZHANG Y X, et al.. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter carbohydrate distribution and amino acid accumulation in Medicago truncatula under lead stress [J/OL]. Environ. Exp. Bot., 2020,171:103950 [2023-11-26]. . |
11 | BEGUM N, AHANGER M A, ZHANG L X. AMF inoculation and phosphorus supplementation alleviates drought induced growth and photosynthetic decline in Nicotiana tabacum by up-regulating antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte accumulation [J/OL]. Environ. Exp. Bot., 2020, 176:104088 [2023-11-26].. |
12 | CROSSAY T, CAVALOC Y, MAJOREL C, et al.. Combinations of different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve fitness and metal tolerance of sorghum in ultramafic soil [J/OL]. Rhizosphere, 2020, 14:100204 [2023-11-26]. . |
13 | 许隽, 胡浩, 曾艳, 等. 丛枝菌根真菌对镉胁迫水稻秧苗生长发育的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(10):30-35, 45. |
XU J, HU H, ZENG Y, et al.. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and development of rice seedings under cadmium stress [J]. J. Northwest A&F Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2021, 49(10): 30-35, 45. | |
14 | 王立, 安广楠, 马放, 等. AMF 对镉污染条件下水稻抗逆性及根际固定性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(10): 1882-1889. |
WANG L, AN G N, MA F, et al.. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on cadmium tolerance and rhizospheric fixation of rice [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2014, 33(10): 1882-1889. | |
15 | 田野,张会慧,孟祥英, 等. 镉(Cd)污染土壤接种丛枝菌根真菌(Glomus mosseae)对黑麦草生长和光合的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(1):135-141. |
TIAN Y, ZHANG H H, MENG X Y, et al.. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus mosseae) on growth and photosynthesis characteristics of Lolium perenne L. under Cd contaminated soil [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2013, 21(1):135-141. | |
16 | BRUTNELL T P, BENNETZEN J L, VOGEL J P. Brachypodium distachyon and Setaria viridis: model genetic systems for the grasses [J]. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol., 2015, 66: 465-485. |
17 | BRUTNELL T P. Model grasses hold key to crop improvement [J/OL]. Nat. Plants, 2015, 1: 15062 [2023-11-26]. . |
18 | KAZNINA N M, TITOV A F, LAIDINEN G F, et al. Setaria viridis tolerance of high zine concentrations [J]. Biol. Bull., 2009, 36(11):575-580. |
19 | 王振艳, 丁军, 孙向辉, 等. 七种本土植物对土壤中镉的富集效果比较研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(12): 61-64. |
WANG Z Y, DING J, SUN X H, et al.. Comparative study on the soil cadmium enrichment effects of seven indigenous plant species [J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2020, 59(12): 61-64. | |
20 | 张丽, 彭重华, 王莹雪, 等. 14种植物对土壤重金属的分布、富集及转运特性[J]. 草业科学, 2014, 31(5): 833- 838. |
ZHANG L, PENG C H, WANG Y X, et al.. Heavy metal distribution bioaccumulation and translocation characteristics of fourteen plants [J]. Pratac. Sci., 2014, 31(5): 833- 838. | |
21 | GIOVANNETTI M, MOSSE B. An evalution of technique for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in root [J]. New Phytol., 1980, 84(3): 489-500. |
22 | PIRIE A, MULLINS M G. Changes in anthocyanin and phenolics content of grapevine leaf and fruit tissues treated with sucrose, nitrate, and abscisic acid [J]. Plant Physiol., 1976, 58(4): 468-472. |
23 | 张中峰, 尤业明, 黄玉清, 等. 模拟岩溶水分供应分层的干旱胁迫对青冈栎光合特性和生长的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(9):2197-2202. |
ZHANG Z F, YOU Y M, HUANG Y Q, et al.. Effects of drought stress on the photosynthesis and growth of Cyclobalanopsis glauca seedlings: a study with simulated hierarchical karst water supply [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2012, 31(9):2197-2202. | |
24 | 肖华, 周宁波, 陶贤蛟. 新墙河区草本植物重金属含量的测定[J]. 分析科学学报, 2010, 26(1): 119-121. |
XIAO H, ZHOU N B, TAO X J. Determination of heavy metals in herbs in the Xinqiang river [J]. J. Anal. Sci., 2010, 26(1): 119-121. | |
25 | 贺金明. 微波消解-石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中铅和镉的方法研究[J]. 华南预防医学, 2017, 43(1): 75-77. |
26 | 冯鹏, 孙力, 申晓慧, 等. 多年生黑麦草对Pb、Cd胁迫的响应及富集能力研究[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1): 153-162. |
FENG P, SUN L, SHEN X H, et al.. Response and enrichment ability of perennial ryegrass under lead and cadmium stresses [J]. Acta Partac. Sin., 2016, 25(1): 153-162. | |
27 | 吴燕玉, 周启星, 田均良. 制定我国土壤环境标准(汞、镉、铅和砷)的探讨[J]. 应用生态学报, 1991, 2(4): 344-349. |
WU Y Y, ZHOU Q X, TIAN J L. An approach to the enactment of soil-environmental standards (Hg, Cd, Pb and As) in China [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 1991, 2(4): 344-349. | |
28 | SEREGIN I V, IVANOV V B. Physiological aspects of cadmium and lead toxic effects on higher plants [J]. Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2001, 48(4): 523-544. |
29 | 滕秋梅, 张中锋, 李红艳, 等. 丛枝菌根真菌对镉胁迫下芦竹生长、光合特性和矿质营养的影响[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52 (6): 1212-1221. |
TENG Q M, ZHANG Z F, LI H Y, et al.. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, photosynthesis characteristics and mineral nutrition of arundo donax under Cd stress [J]. Soils, 2020, 52 (6): 1212-1221. | |
30 | 毕银丽, 张延旭, 江彬, 等. 水分胁迫下AM 真菌与解磷细菌协同对玉米生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(12): 3655-3661. |
BI Y L, ZHANG Y X, JIANG B, et al.. Effects of AM fungi and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria inoculation on maize growth and soil fertility under water stress [J]. J. China Coal Soc., 2019, 44(12): 3655-3661. | |
31 | 悦飞雪, 李继伟, 王艳芳, 等. 生物炭和AM真菌提高矿区土壤养分有效性的机理[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(8): 1325-1334. |
YUE F X, LI J W, WANG Y F, et al.. Mechanism of the improvement effect by biochar and AM fungi on the availability of soil nutrients in coal mining area [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2019, 25(8): 1325-1334. | |
32 | CHRISTOPHERSEN H M, SMITH F A, SMITH S E. Unraveling the influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on arsenic tolerance in Medicago: Glomus mosseae is more effective than G. intraradices, associated with lower expression of root epidermal Pi transporter genes [J/OL]. Front. Physiol., 2012, 3: 91 [2023-11-26]. . |
33 | PENG R N, SUN W Y, JIN X X, et al.. Analysis of 2,4-epibrassinolide created an enhancement tolerance on Cd toxicity in Solanum nigrum L. [J]. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2020, 27(14):16784-16797. |
34 | 李明亮, 李欢, 王凯荣, 等. Cd 胁迫下丛枝菌根对花生生长、光合生理及 Cd 吸收的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2016, 35 (11): 2344-2352. |
LI M L, LI H, WANG K R, et al.. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the growth,photosynthetic characteristics and cadmium uptake of peanut plant under cadmium stress [J]. Environ. Chem., 2016, 35 (11): 2344-2352. | |
35 | 韩玮. 丛枝菌根真菌对镉胁迫下黑麦草光合生理的响应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(6): 204-212, 220. |
HAN W. Response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthetic physiology of Lolium perenne under Cd stress [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2022(6): 204-212, 220. |
[1] | Zihao WANG, Xue ZHOU, Donghan ZHANG, Hongyi LIANG, Yan WANG, Ziang ZHAO, Qing CHEN. Effect of Water-soluble Fertilizers Containing Humic-acids on Maize Seedlings Growth and Soil Properties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 209-220. |
[2] | Xiaoshuang CHEN, Xingqian XU, Xi ZHAO, Xin QU, Haijun WANG, Guangcan PENG. Study on Resistivity Characteristics and Evaluation Model of Cadmium Contaminated Laterite [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 164-173. |
[3] | Shuang LI, Aiying WANG, Zhen JIAO, Qing CHI, Hao SUN, Tao JIAO. Physiological and Chemical Characteristics and Transcriptome Analysis of Different Type of Wheat Seedlings Under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 20-32. |
[4] | Yu MIAO, Jie WANG, Yaoyao ZHAO, Lijia ZHANG, Meijun LIU. Study on Recovery Characteristics of Photosynthesis in Alfalfa Leaves After Low Temperature Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 80-89. |
[5] | Zitian PU, Fei WANG, Chang LI, Xinxin WANG. Research Progress of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Affecting Plant Nitrogen Absorption and Transport [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(11): 171-179. |
[6] | Wanjing XU, Fang PENG, Doudou ZHAO, Jiaojiao LUO, Shan TAO, Hailang LIAO, Changqing MAO, Yu WU, Xiu ZHU, Zhengjun XU, Chao ZHANG. Analysis of Response Mechanism of Ligusticum chuanxiong to Cadmium Stress Based on Transcriptome and Metabolome [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 98-109. |
[7] | Jingjuan GAO, Chenyu ZHU, Yuqin KE, Chaoyuan ZHENG, Chunying LI, Wenqing LI. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application Period on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in Flue-cured Tobacco Under Tobacco-Rice Rotation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 157-165. |
[8] | Liying YANG, Mengya TAI, Yeyu ZHAI, Zicheng XU, Wuxing HUANG. Progress of Research on the Effect of Sulfur on Cadmium Uptake and Accumulation by Plants and Its Mechanism [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 10-21. |
[9] | Xiang WU, Juan LI, Yan CAO, Yanrong CHENG, Xuyu YAN, Ling LI. Research Advances on Plant Root Exudates in Response to Cadmium Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 12-20. |
[10] | Xiaoting WANG, Pengpeng ZHANG. Phylogenic and Functional Profile of Ser/Thr Kinases in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 66-76. |
[11] | Lu MENG, Jingwen FAN, Xinyu SAI, Lusheng ZENG, Xiangyun SONG, Dejie CUI. Effects of Lime on Soil Improvement and Plant Growth in Apple Orchards [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 197-204. |
[12] | Haiyu SHEN, Hao ZHANG, Zilong WU, Chao HAN, Wei SONG, Xiaofei MA. Effect of Addition Several Kinds of Amendment on the Water-retaining Properties of Gangue Matrix and the Germination of Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 161-168. |
[13] | Yunfei LIU, Fengjie WEI, Maolin XIA, Zhaojin YU, Hao XIA, Chunyu YI, Jianbo CHANG, Xiaoming JI. Alleviative Effect of New Composite Hydrogels on Cadmium Stress Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 188-197. |
[14] | Junyu ZHOU, Yu GU, Zhenqi TANG, Haiyong WU, Qiongfeng LIU, Mingde LI. Effect of Compound Chelating Agent on Remediation of Cadmium Contaminated Farmland by Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 186-194. |
[15] | Long ZHENG. Research on Effects of Genotypes and Environments on Cd Contents in Pakchoi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 58-65. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||