-
Influences of Different Topping Methods on Cotton Growth and Yield Traits Under Different Plant Densities in Southern Xinjiang
- WANG Tangang1§, MA Li1§, LI Kefu1, WANG Jichuan2*, Li Huiqin1, JI Guangpeng1, HAO Quanyou1, CUI Jianqiang1, HU Bao1
-
2019, 21(6):
110-116.
DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2018.0305
-
Asbtract
(
)
PDF (975KB)
(
)
-
Related Articles |
Metrics
In order to resolve the problems of of time-consuming, inefficient and high cost of artificial top-sealing in cotton production process, the interplay effect of planting density and capping on cotton yield and fiber quality was explored, and the feasibility of replacing the artificial seal with chemical seal was analyzed. As one of the techniques of mechanized and simplified cultivation of cotton, chemical topping has certain influence on the growth and yield formation of different populations of cotton. In this paper, 419 was used as the material for the split plot experiment. The density was the main area including 9×104 plants/hm2, 18×104 plants/hm2 and 27×104 plants/hm2; the topping mode was the sub-area including no-topping, artificial topping and chemical topping. The effects of different topping methods under different planting densities were studied, and the feasibility of chemical topping instead of artificial capping was also discussed. The results showed that: Under the same topping method, the translocation rate of reproductive organ dry weight and LAI increased with the increase of density, but the leaf area, dry matter accumulation and harvest index decreased, and the plant height changed little. Under the same density, topping method had little effect on leaf area per plant, LAI and dry matter accumulation per plant. Compared with the no-topping treatment, the plant height of topping treatment was reduced by 4.90~6.46 cm, and the dry matter translocation rate of reproductive organs, harvest index, lint content and yield were increased by 6.33~9.47 percentage points, 0.03~0.05 percentage points, 0.03~1.01 percentage points and 529.56~301.42 kg/hm2, respectively; Compared with artificial topping, though the leaf area, LAI, plant height and dry weight per plant of chemical topping treatment were increased by 0.01 m2, 0.11, 1.56 cm and 1.80 g/plant, respectively, the dry matter transport rate, harvest index, lint percentage and yield were decreased by 3.14 percentage points, 0.03, 0.42 percentage points and 228.14 kg/hm2, respectively; but there was no significant difference among the characters. The interaction between density and topping method is less affected. The above showed that topping was the key measure to optimize cotton growth and ensure yield, and chemical topping had the similar effect of artificial topping.