中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 150-157.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0541
• 食品质量 加工储运 • 上一篇
陈国顺1(), 田斌2, 高燕程1, 李延翠1, 田文锦3, 杨文静4, 吴万成5, 黄立军5
收稿日期:
2023-07-12
接受日期:
2024-02-04
出版日期:
2025-02-15
发布日期:
2025-02-14
作者简介:
陈国顺 E-mail:chengs@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
Guoshun CHEN1(), Bin TIAN2, Yancheng GAO1, Yancui LI1, Wenjin TIAN3, Wenjing YANG4, Wancheng WU5, Lijun HUANG5
Received:
2023-07-12
Accepted:
2024-02-04
Online:
2025-02-15
Published:
2025-02-14
摘要:
为阐明黄芪多糖对滩羊生长性能、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响,选择24只健康、体重相近(22.17±1.21 kg)的50日龄滩羊公羔,随机分为4组进行育肥试验,试验日粮分别设置为基础日粮组(对照组)、基础日粮+0.05%黄芪多糖组(试验Ⅰ组)、基础日粮+0.10%黄芪多糖组(试验Ⅱ组)和基础日粮+0.15%黄芪多糖组(试验Ⅲ组)。在试验的第0、10和70天分别称重,在试验期结束时(第70天)屠宰并测定胴体性性能和肉品质。结果显示,与对照组相比,试验Ⅱ组滩羊的末重和平均日增重显著增加,饲料转化率显著降低;试验Ⅱ组的胴体重和屠宰率显著增加;试验Ⅱ组和试验Ⅲ组的熟肉率显著增加;试验Ⅰ组和试验Ⅱ组的背膘厚显著降低,试验Ⅱ组处理的亮度(L*)显著降低;试验Ⅱ组和试验Ⅲ组滩羊肌肉的甘氨酸、天冬氨酸和总氨基酸含量显著增加,鲜味氨基酸含量在添加了黄芪多糖处理中显著增加;试验Ⅱ组的单不饱和脂肪酸(monounsaturated fatty acids,MUFA)和多不饱和脂肪酸含量显著增加;试验Ⅱ组和试验Ⅲ组的MUFA/TFA(总脂肪酸,total fatty acids)显著增加。综上所述,日粮中添加0.10%黄芪多糖可以提高滩羊的生长性能,改善胴体性能及肉品质。
中图分类号:
陈国顺, 田斌, 高燕程, 李延翠, 田文锦, 杨文静, 吴万成, 黄立军. 黄芪多糖对舍饲滩羊生产性能、胴体性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 150-157.
Guoshun CHEN, Bin TIAN, Yancheng GAO, Yancui LI, Wenjin TIAN, Wenjing YANG, Wancheng WU, Lijun HUANG. Effects of Astragalus Polysaccharides on Production Performance, Carcass Performance and Meat Quality of Stellar-fed Tan Sheep[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 150-157.
原料 Ingredient | 质量分数Mass fraction/% |
---|---|
玉米Corn grain | 29.62 |
花生粕Peanut meal | 9.87 |
苜蓿颗粒Alfalfa hay | 9.87 |
麸皮Bran | 9.87 |
喷浆玉米皮Spouting corn husks | 9.87 |
稻壳粉Rice husk meal | 9.86 |
杂草颗粒Weed particle | 9.86 |
柠条粉Caragana powder | 4.94 |
糖蜜Molasses | 1.97 |
膨化尿素Expanded urea | 1.48 |
石粉Limestone | 1.38 |
1%预混合饲料1% premix | 1.00 |
食盐Salt | 0.39 |
苦豆渣Bitter bean residue | 0.20 |
合计Total | 100.00 |
表1 基础饲粮组成
Table 1 Basal diet composition
原料 Ingredient | 质量分数Mass fraction/% |
---|---|
玉米Corn grain | 29.62 |
花生粕Peanut meal | 9.87 |
苜蓿颗粒Alfalfa hay | 9.87 |
麸皮Bran | 9.87 |
喷浆玉米皮Spouting corn husks | 9.87 |
稻壳粉Rice husk meal | 9.86 |
杂草颗粒Weed particle | 9.86 |
柠条粉Caragana powder | 4.94 |
糖蜜Molasses | 1.97 |
膨化尿素Expanded urea | 1.48 |
石粉Limestone | 1.38 |
1%预混合饲料1% premix | 1.00 |
食盐Salt | 0.39 |
苦豆渣Bitter bean residue | 0.20 |
合计Total | 100.00 |
项目 Item | 含量Content |
---|---|
干物质Dry matter/% | 68.35 |
消化能Digestible energy/(MJ·kg-1) | 13.48 |
代谢能Metabolic energy/(MJ·kg-1) | 11.64 |
粗蛋白质Crude protein/% | 14.92 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber/% | 26.79 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber/% | 11.27 |
钙Ca/% | 0.89 |
磷P/% | 0.37 |
表2 营养水平
Table 2 Nutrient levels
项目 Item | 含量Content |
---|---|
干物质Dry matter/% | 68.35 |
消化能Digestible energy/(MJ·kg-1) | 13.48 |
代谢能Metabolic energy/(MJ·kg-1) | 11.64 |
粗蛋白质Crude protein/% | 14.92 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber/% | 26.79 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber/% | 11.27 |
钙Ca/% | 0.89 |
磷P/% | 0.37 |
指标 Index | 处理Treatment | P值 P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 CK | 试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ | 试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ | ||
初始体质量IBW/kg | 23.17±0.11 a | 22.87±0.45 a | 23.45±0.52 a | 23.21±0.06 a | 0.180 |
终末体质量FBW/kg | 37.53±0.25 c | 39.60±0.56 b | 41.85±0.71 a | 40.23±0.07 b | 0.047 |
平均日采食量ADFI/kg | 1.64±0.01 a | 1.61±0.30 a | 1.61±0.01 a | 1.62±0.01 a | 0.161 |
平均日增重ADG/kg | 0.23±0.05 c | 0.27±0.05 b | 0.29±0.07 a | 0.27±0.01 b | 0.033 |
饲料转化率FCR | 7.08±0.26 a | 6.06±0.04 b | 5.99±0.04 b | 6.07±0.03 b | 0.027 |
表 3 不同处理组滩羊的生产性能
Table 3 Production performance of Tan sheep under different treatments
指标 Index | 处理Treatment | P值 P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 CK | 试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ | 试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ | ||
初始体质量IBW/kg | 23.17±0.11 a | 22.87±0.45 a | 23.45±0.52 a | 23.21±0.06 a | 0.180 |
终末体质量FBW/kg | 37.53±0.25 c | 39.60±0.56 b | 41.85±0.71 a | 40.23±0.07 b | 0.047 |
平均日采食量ADFI/kg | 1.64±0.01 a | 1.61±0.30 a | 1.61±0.01 a | 1.62±0.01 a | 0.161 |
平均日增重ADG/kg | 0.23±0.05 c | 0.27±0.05 b | 0.29±0.07 a | 0.27±0.01 b | 0.033 |
饲料转化率FCR | 7.08±0.26 a | 6.06±0.04 b | 5.99±0.04 b | 6.07±0.03 b | 0.027 |
指标 Index | 处理Treatment | P值 P value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 CK | 试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ | 试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ | |||
胴体重 CW/kg | 18.20±0.82 c | 19.92±0.29 b | 21.87±0.40 a | 20.17±0.26 b | 0.041 | |
屠宰率 SR/% | 48.38±0.02 c | 50.30±0.05 b | 52.25±0.05 a | 50.14±0.42 b | 0.026 | |
背膘厚 BFT/mm | 13.15±0.60 a | 12.48±0.20 b | 12.42±0.20 b | 13.10±0.31 a | 0.022 | |
蒸煮损失 CL/% | 53.33±0.35 a | 51.33±0.25 a | 50.67±0.15 a | 49.76±0.15 a | 0.350 | |
熟肉率 CMR/% | 65.33±0.25 b | 68.67±0.49 b | 70.67±0.31 a | 73.67±0.35 a | 0.048 | |
剪切力 SF/N | 74.00±22.38 a | 70.76±16.24 a | 56.06±22.99 a | 67.88±10.53 a | 0.086 | |
滴水损失 DL/% | 3.67±0.21 a | 6.00±0.61 a | 4.30±0.21 a | 3.70±0.06 a | 0.337 | |
失水率 WLR/% | 21.68±0.19 a | 20.67±0.13 a | 20.00±0.07 a | 19.00±0.06 a | 0.762 | |
pH45 min | 6.51±0.45 a | 6.50±0.42 a | 6.48±0.05 a | 6.49±0.53 a | 0.716 | |
pH24 h | 5.94±0.19 a | 5.79±0.87 a | 5.74±0.75 a | 5.80±0.12 a | 0.583 | |
肉色 Meat color | 亮度 L* | 34.58±3.81 a | 32.50±1.93 ab | 29.81±2.91 b | 30.98±1.38 ab | 0.048 |
红度 a* | 20.82±1.53 a | 21.19±2.95 a | 24.38±2.70 a | 22.88±1.10 a | 0.241 | |
黄度 b* | 10.16±0.71 a | 10.07±0.43 a | 8.99±1.40 a | 9.11±0.51 a | 0.097 |
表 4 不同处理组滩羊的屠宰性能及肉品质
Table 4 Slaughter performance and meat quality of Tan sheep under different treatments
指标 Index | 处理Treatment | P值 P value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 CK | 试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ | 试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ | |||
胴体重 CW/kg | 18.20±0.82 c | 19.92±0.29 b | 21.87±0.40 a | 20.17±0.26 b | 0.041 | |
屠宰率 SR/% | 48.38±0.02 c | 50.30±0.05 b | 52.25±0.05 a | 50.14±0.42 b | 0.026 | |
背膘厚 BFT/mm | 13.15±0.60 a | 12.48±0.20 b | 12.42±0.20 b | 13.10±0.31 a | 0.022 | |
蒸煮损失 CL/% | 53.33±0.35 a | 51.33±0.25 a | 50.67±0.15 a | 49.76±0.15 a | 0.350 | |
熟肉率 CMR/% | 65.33±0.25 b | 68.67±0.49 b | 70.67±0.31 a | 73.67±0.35 a | 0.048 | |
剪切力 SF/N | 74.00±22.38 a | 70.76±16.24 a | 56.06±22.99 a | 67.88±10.53 a | 0.086 | |
滴水损失 DL/% | 3.67±0.21 a | 6.00±0.61 a | 4.30±0.21 a | 3.70±0.06 a | 0.337 | |
失水率 WLR/% | 21.68±0.19 a | 20.67±0.13 a | 20.00±0.07 a | 19.00±0.06 a | 0.762 | |
pH45 min | 6.51±0.45 a | 6.50±0.42 a | 6.48±0.05 a | 6.49±0.53 a | 0.716 | |
pH24 h | 5.94±0.19 a | 5.79±0.87 a | 5.74±0.75 a | 5.80±0.12 a | 0.583 | |
肉色 Meat color | 亮度 L* | 34.58±3.81 a | 32.50±1.93 ab | 29.81±2.91 b | 30.98±1.38 ab | 0.048 |
红度 a* | 20.82±1.53 a | 21.19±2.95 a | 24.38±2.70 a | 22.88±1.10 a | 0.241 | |
黄度 b* | 10.16±0.71 a | 10.07±0.43 a | 8.99±1.40 a | 9.11±0.51 a | 0.097 |
指标 Index | 处理Treatment | P值 P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 CK | 试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ | 试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ | ||
甘氨酸 Gly*/(mg·kg-1) | 0.85±0.03 c | 0.97±0.01 b | 1.14±0.05 a | 1.08±0.06 a | 0.046 |
天冬氨酸 Asp*/(mg·kg-1) | 1.67±0.05 c | 1.81±0.05 b | 2.01±0.12 a | 1.95±0.03 a | 0.033 |
谷氨酸 Glu*/(mg·kg-1) | 2.94±0.04 b | 3.02±0.02 ab | 3.07±0.03 ab | 3.13±0.16a | 0.025 |
脯氨酸 Pro*/(mg·kg-1) | 0.66±0.13 a | 0.74±0.02 a | 0.75±0.05 a | 0.71±0.15 a | 0.105 |
丙氨酸 Ala*/(mg·kg-1) | 0.72±0.58 a | 1.03±0.04 a | 1.16±0.15 a | 1.07±0.15 a | 0.157 |
缬氨酸 Val#/(mg·kg-1) | 1.14±0.12 a | 1.18±0.06 a | 1.20±0.02 a | 1.15±0.07 a | 0.362 |
蛋氨酸 Met#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.29±0.04 a | 0.32±0.01 a | 0.34±0.10 a | 0.30±0.03 a | 0.462 |
异亮氨酸 Ile#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.69±0.11 a | 0.78±0.04 a | 0.93±0.23 a | 0.83±0.06 a | 0.224 |
亮氨酸 Leu#/(mg·kg-1) | 1.54±0.64 a | 1.66±0.52 a | 1.86±0.12 a | 1.79±0.31 a | 0.227 |
赖氨酸 Lys#/(mg·kg-1) | 1.13±0.55 a | 1.85±0.16 a | 1.92±0.11 a | 1.78±0.27 a | 0.316 |
苯丙氨酸 Phe#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.75±0.13 a | 0.81±0.21 a | 0.84±0.06 a | 0.79±0.04 a | 0.441 |
组氨酸 His#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.59±0.11 a | 0.63±0.07 a | 0.68±0.01 a | 0.65±0.03 a | 0.524 |
苏氨酸 Thr#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.73±0.02 a | 0.80±0.04 b | 0.91±0.04 c | 0.87±0.03 c | 0.037 |
丝氨酸 Ser/(mg·kg-1) | 0.65±0.12 a | 0.73±0.10 a | 0.69±0.03 a | 0.76±0.01 a | 0.146 |
精氨酸 Arg/(mg·kg-1) | 1.18±0.24 a | 1.30±0.04 a | 1.26±0.13 a | 1.21±0.12 a | 0.127 |
胱氨酸 Cys/(mg·kg-1) | 0.09±0.03 a | 0.13±0.01 a | 0.15±0.04 a | 0.13±0.02 a | 0.211 |
酪氨酸 Tyr/(mg·kg-1) | 0.69±0.05 a | 0.71±0.02 a | 0.75±0.03 a | 0.72±0.06 a | 0.155 |
非必需氨基酸 NEAA/(mg·kg-1) | 9.46±0.31 c | 10.02±0.30 b | 10.56±0.15 a | 10.34±0.21 ab | 0.036 |
必需氨基酸 EAA/(mg·kg-1) | 6.77±1.38 a | 7.37±0.28 a | 7.99±0.17 a | 7.55±0.40 a | 0.146 |
鲜味氨基酸 UAA/(mg·kg-1) | 6.88±0.70 b | 7.61±0.03 a | 8.26±0.20 a | 8.06±0.18 a | 0.041 |
甜味氨基酸 SAA/(mg·kg-1) | 5.50±0.86 a | 5.92±0.45 a | 6.46±0.16 a | 6.29±0.05 a | 0.172 |
总氨基酸 TAA/(mg·kg-1) | 16.93±1.89 b | 18.37±0.26 ab | 19.69±0.17 a | 18.88±0.73 a | 0.028 |
EAA/TAA | 0.39±0.04 a | 0.41±0.02 a | 0.46±0.00 a | 0.40±0.02 a | 0.062 |
UAA/TAA | 0.40±0.01 a | 0.41±0.01 a | 0.42±0.01 a | 0.42±0.02 a | 0.053 |
表 5 不同处理组滩羊背最长肌的氨基酸含量
Table 5 Amino acids in the longest muscle of Tan sheep under different treatments
指标 Index | 处理Treatment | P值 P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 CK | 试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ | 试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ | ||
甘氨酸 Gly*/(mg·kg-1) | 0.85±0.03 c | 0.97±0.01 b | 1.14±0.05 a | 1.08±0.06 a | 0.046 |
天冬氨酸 Asp*/(mg·kg-1) | 1.67±0.05 c | 1.81±0.05 b | 2.01±0.12 a | 1.95±0.03 a | 0.033 |
谷氨酸 Glu*/(mg·kg-1) | 2.94±0.04 b | 3.02±0.02 ab | 3.07±0.03 ab | 3.13±0.16a | 0.025 |
脯氨酸 Pro*/(mg·kg-1) | 0.66±0.13 a | 0.74±0.02 a | 0.75±0.05 a | 0.71±0.15 a | 0.105 |
丙氨酸 Ala*/(mg·kg-1) | 0.72±0.58 a | 1.03±0.04 a | 1.16±0.15 a | 1.07±0.15 a | 0.157 |
缬氨酸 Val#/(mg·kg-1) | 1.14±0.12 a | 1.18±0.06 a | 1.20±0.02 a | 1.15±0.07 a | 0.362 |
蛋氨酸 Met#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.29±0.04 a | 0.32±0.01 a | 0.34±0.10 a | 0.30±0.03 a | 0.462 |
异亮氨酸 Ile#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.69±0.11 a | 0.78±0.04 a | 0.93±0.23 a | 0.83±0.06 a | 0.224 |
亮氨酸 Leu#/(mg·kg-1) | 1.54±0.64 a | 1.66±0.52 a | 1.86±0.12 a | 1.79±0.31 a | 0.227 |
赖氨酸 Lys#/(mg·kg-1) | 1.13±0.55 a | 1.85±0.16 a | 1.92±0.11 a | 1.78±0.27 a | 0.316 |
苯丙氨酸 Phe#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.75±0.13 a | 0.81±0.21 a | 0.84±0.06 a | 0.79±0.04 a | 0.441 |
组氨酸 His#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.59±0.11 a | 0.63±0.07 a | 0.68±0.01 a | 0.65±0.03 a | 0.524 |
苏氨酸 Thr#/(mg·kg-1) | 0.73±0.02 a | 0.80±0.04 b | 0.91±0.04 c | 0.87±0.03 c | 0.037 |
丝氨酸 Ser/(mg·kg-1) | 0.65±0.12 a | 0.73±0.10 a | 0.69±0.03 a | 0.76±0.01 a | 0.146 |
精氨酸 Arg/(mg·kg-1) | 1.18±0.24 a | 1.30±0.04 a | 1.26±0.13 a | 1.21±0.12 a | 0.127 |
胱氨酸 Cys/(mg·kg-1) | 0.09±0.03 a | 0.13±0.01 a | 0.15±0.04 a | 0.13±0.02 a | 0.211 |
酪氨酸 Tyr/(mg·kg-1) | 0.69±0.05 a | 0.71±0.02 a | 0.75±0.03 a | 0.72±0.06 a | 0.155 |
非必需氨基酸 NEAA/(mg·kg-1) | 9.46±0.31 c | 10.02±0.30 b | 10.56±0.15 a | 10.34±0.21 ab | 0.036 |
必需氨基酸 EAA/(mg·kg-1) | 6.77±1.38 a | 7.37±0.28 a | 7.99±0.17 a | 7.55±0.40 a | 0.146 |
鲜味氨基酸 UAA/(mg·kg-1) | 6.88±0.70 b | 7.61±0.03 a | 8.26±0.20 a | 8.06±0.18 a | 0.041 |
甜味氨基酸 SAA/(mg·kg-1) | 5.50±0.86 a | 5.92±0.45 a | 6.46±0.16 a | 6.29±0.05 a | 0.172 |
总氨基酸 TAA/(mg·kg-1) | 16.93±1.89 b | 18.37±0.26 ab | 19.69±0.17 a | 18.88±0.73 a | 0.028 |
EAA/TAA | 0.39±0.04 a | 0.41±0.02 a | 0.46±0.00 a | 0.40±0.02 a | 0.062 |
UAA/TAA | 0.40±0.01 a | 0.41±0.01 a | 0.42±0.01 a | 0.42±0.02 a | 0.053 |
指标 Index | 处理Treatment | P值 P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 CK | 试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ | 试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ | ||
总脂肪酸TFA/(mg·kg-1) | 69.35±3.53 a | 71.20±1.63 a | 75.99±1.31 a | 72.49±4.29 a | 0.075 |
饱和脂肪酸SFA/(mg·kg-1) | 34.24±0.56 a | 30.42±1.31 b | 29.18±0.82 b | 30.01±2.59 b | 0.031 |
单不饱和脂肪酸MUFA/(mg·kg-1) | 32.79±1.47 c | 34.87±2.57 b | 40.39±0.72 a | 35.64±1.99 b | 0.037 |
多不饱和脂肪酸PUFA/(mg·kg-1) | 4.16±0.34 c | 5.06±0.04 b | 5.81±0.09 a | 4.85±0.19 b | 0.029 |
不饱和脂肪酸UFA/(mg·kg-1) | 36.95±1.25 a | 40.03±2.54 ab | 46.20±0.71 a | 42.49±1.80 b | 0.044 |
SFA/TFA | 0.46±0.00 a | 0.44±0.01 b | 0.39±0.00 c | 0.413±0.02 b | 0.025 |
UFA/TFA | 0.51±0.00 a | 0.57±0.01 b | 0.60±0.01 c | 0.58±0.09 b | 0.040 |
MUFA/TFA | 0.46±0.01 c | 0.49±0.02 b | 0.53±0.01 a | 0.52±0.01 a | 0.036 |
PUFA/TFA | 0.06±0.01 a | 0.07±0.01 a | 0.07±0.01 a | 0.07±0.01 a | 0.832 |
表 6 不同处理组滩羊背最长肌的总脂肪酸含量
Table 6 Fatty acid content in the longest muscle of Tan sheep under different treatments
指标 Index | 处理Treatment | P值 P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 CK | 试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ | 试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ | 试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ | ||
总脂肪酸TFA/(mg·kg-1) | 69.35±3.53 a | 71.20±1.63 a | 75.99±1.31 a | 72.49±4.29 a | 0.075 |
饱和脂肪酸SFA/(mg·kg-1) | 34.24±0.56 a | 30.42±1.31 b | 29.18±0.82 b | 30.01±2.59 b | 0.031 |
单不饱和脂肪酸MUFA/(mg·kg-1) | 32.79±1.47 c | 34.87±2.57 b | 40.39±0.72 a | 35.64±1.99 b | 0.037 |
多不饱和脂肪酸PUFA/(mg·kg-1) | 4.16±0.34 c | 5.06±0.04 b | 5.81±0.09 a | 4.85±0.19 b | 0.029 |
不饱和脂肪酸UFA/(mg·kg-1) | 36.95±1.25 a | 40.03±2.54 ab | 46.20±0.71 a | 42.49±1.80 b | 0.044 |
SFA/TFA | 0.46±0.00 a | 0.44±0.01 b | 0.39±0.00 c | 0.413±0.02 b | 0.025 |
UFA/TFA | 0.51±0.00 a | 0.57±0.01 b | 0.60±0.01 c | 0.58±0.09 b | 0.040 |
MUFA/TFA | 0.46±0.01 c | 0.49±0.02 b | 0.53±0.01 a | 0.52±0.01 a | 0.036 |
PUFA/TFA | 0.06±0.01 a | 0.07±0.01 a | 0.07±0.01 a | 0.07±0.01 a | 0.832 |
1 | BROWN K, UWIERA R R E, KALMOKOFF M L, et al.. Antimicrobial growth promoter use in livestock: a requirement to understand their modes of action to develop effective alternatives [J]. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 2017, 49(1):12-24. |
2 | CHO I, YAMANISHI S, COX L, et al.. Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity [J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7413):621-626. |
3 | LAXMINARAYAN R, DUSE A, WATTAL C, et al.. Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions [J]. Lancet Infect. Dis., 2013, 13(12):1057-1098. |
4 | TZIANABOS A O. Polysaccharide immunomodulators as therapeutic agents: structural aspects and biologic function [J]. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 2000, 13(4):523-533. |
5 | ZHANG C H, YANG X, WEI J R, et al.. Ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology and clinical applications of radix astragali [J]. Chin. J. Integr. Med., 2021, 27(3):229-240. |
6 | FU J, WANG Z H, HUANG L F, et al.. Review of the botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, and pharmacology of astragalus membranaceus (Huangqi) [J]. Phytother. Res., 2014, 28(9):1275-1283. |
7 | DONNELLY-GREENAN E L, NEVINS H M, HARVEY J T. Entangled seabird and marine mammal reports from citizen science surveys from coastal California (1997—2017) [J/OL]. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2019, 149:110557 [2023-05-20]. . |
8 | QIN Q, NIU J, WANG Z, et al.. Astragalus embranaceus extract activates immune response in macrophages via heparinase [J]. Molecules, 2012, 17(6):7232-7240. |
9 | JUNG Y, JERNG U, LEE S. A systematic review of anticancer effects of Radix Astragali [J]. Chin. J. Integr. Med., 2016, 22(3):225-236. |
10 | CHEN Z J, LIU L J, GAO C F, et al.. Astragali Radix (Huangqi): a promising edible immunomodulatory herbal medicine [J/OL]. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2020, 258:112895 [2023-05-20]. . |
11 | ZHENG Y J, REN W Y, ZHANG L N, et al.. A review of the pharmacological action of astragalus polysaccharide [J/OL]. Front. Pharmacol., 2020, 11:349 [2023-05-20]. . |
12 | CHEN H L, LI D F, CHANG B Y, et al.. Effects of Chinese herbal polysaccharides on the immunity and growth performance of young broilers [J]. Poult. Sci., 2003, 82(3):364-370. |
13 | QIU Y, HU Y L, CUI B A, et al.. Immunopotentiating effects of four Chinese herbal polysaccharides administered at vaccination in chickens [J]. Poult. Sci., 2007, 86(12):2530-2535. |
14 | GUO F C, KWAKKEL R P, WILLIAMS B A, et al.. Effects of mushroom and herb polysaccharides, as alternatives for an antibiotic, on growth performance of broilers [J]. British Poult. Sci., 2004, 45(5):684-694. |
15 | PREDY G N, GOEL V, LOVLIN R, et al.. Efficacy of an extract of North American ginseng containing poly-furanosyl-pyranosyl-saccharides for preventing upper respiratory tract infections: a randomized controlled trial [J]. CMAJ, 2005, 173(9):1043-1048. |
16 | DALLOUL R A, LILLEHOJ H S, LEE J S, et al.. Immunopotentiating effect of a Fomitella fraxinea-derived lectin on chicken immunity and resistance to coccidiosis [J]. Poult. Sci., 2006, 85(3):446-451. |
17 | URBANO S A, RODRIGUES J C N, RIBEIRO P H C, et al.. Nutrient intake, performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and cost analysis of sheep submitted to intermittent supplementation on masai grass pastures [J/OL]. Animals (Basel), 2023, 13(7):1267 [2023-05-20]. . |
18 | O’REILLY R A, PANNIER L, GARDNER G E, et al.. Minor differences in perceived sheepmeat eating quality scores of Australian, Chinese and American consumers [J/OL]. Meat Sci. 2020, 164(4):108060 [2023-05-20]. . |
19 | FONT-I-FURNOLS M, GUERRERO L. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: an overview [J]. Meat Sci., 2014, 98(3):361-371. |
20 | GRUNERT K G, BREDAHL L, BRUNSØ K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector-a review [J]. Meat Sci., 2004, 66(2):259-272. |
21 | HENCHION M, MCCARTHY M, RESCONI V C, et al.. Meat consumption: trends and quality matters [J]. Meat Sci., 2014, 98(3):561-568. |
22 | BRITO G F D, PONNAMPALAM E N, HOPKINS D L. The effect of extensive feeding systems on growth rate, carcass traits, and meat quality of finishing lambs [J]. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 2017, 16(1):23-38. |
23 | 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 肉羊饲养标准: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2004. |
24 | 蒋红琴.番茄红素对巴美肉羊肉品质的影响及其抗氧化机理研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2015. |
JIANG H Q. Effect of lycopene on meat quality of Barmei mutton and its antioxidant mechanism [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2007. | |
25 | 贾健斌,赵熙和. 食品安全国家标准 食品中氨基酸含量的测定 高效液相色谱法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016. |
26 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中脂肪酸的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016. |
27 | WANG X J, DING L M, WEI H Y, et al.. Astragalus membranaceus root supplementation improves average daily gain, rumen fermentation, serum immunity and antioxidant indices of Tibetan sheep [J/OL]. Animal, 2021, 15(1):100061 [2023-05-20]. . |
28 | ZHONG R Z, YU M, LIU H W, et al.. Effects of dietary Astragalus polysaccharide and Astragalus membranaceus root supplementation on growth performance, rumen fermentation, immune responses, and antioxidant status of lambs [J]. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2012, 174(1-2):60-67. |
29 | YIN F G, LIU Y L, YIN Y L, et al.. Dietary supplementation with Astragalus polysaccharide enhances ileal digestibilities and serum concentrations of amino acids in early weaned piglets [J]. Amino Acids. 2009, 37(2):263-70. |
30 | DENG D J, WANG J, REN L P, et al.. The effect of different doses of Astragalus root extract on in vitro rumen fermentation of steam-flaked maize grains used as an only substrate [C]//International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores(ISNH-7), Beijing, 2007:172-177. |
31 | LIU M, QIN J, HAO Y, et al.. Astragalus polysaccharide suppresses skeletal muscle myostatin expression in diabetes: involvement of ROS-ERK and NF-κB pathways [J/OL]. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev., 2013, 2013(12):782497 [2023-05-20]. . |
32 | SUN H, LUO Y, ZHAO F, et al.. The effect of replacing wildrye hay with mulberry leaves on the growth performance, blood metabolites, and carcass characteristics of sheep [J/OL]. Animals (Basel), 2020, 10(11):2018 [2023-05-20]. . |
33 | ZHANG R, PAVAN E, ROSS A B, et al.. Molecular insights into quality and authentication of sheep meat from proteomics and metabolomics [J/OL]. J. Proteomics, 2023, 276:104836 [2023-05-20]. . |
34 | WANG W X, YANG H J, BO Y K, et al.. Nutrient composition, polyphenolic contents, and in situ protein degradation kinetics of leaves from three mulberry species [J]. Livest. Sci., 2012, 146(2-3):203-206. |
35 | PRIOLO A, WAGHORN G C, LANZA M, et al.. Polyethylene glycol as a means for reducing the impact of condensed tannins in carob pulp: effects on lamb growth performance and meat quality [J]. J. Anim. Sci., 2000, 78(4):810-816. |
36 | WU G. Dietary protein intake and human health [J]. Food Funct., 2016, 7(3):1251-1265. |
37 | REEDS P J, BURRIN D G, STOLL B, et al.. Role of the gut in the amino acid economy of the host [J]. Nestle Nutr. Workshop Ser. Clin. Perform. Programme, 2000, 3(12):25-46. |
38 | TOMÉ D. Digestibility issues of vegetable versus animal proteins: protein and amino acid requirements-functional aspects [J]. Food Nutr. Bull., 2013, 34(2):272-274. |
39 | WANG L, LIU K, WANG Z, et al.. Bacterial community diversity associated with different utilization efficiencies of nitrogen in the gastrointestinal tract of goats [J]. Front. Microbiol., 2019, 10:239 [2023-05-20]. . |
40 | SIMOPOULOS A P. Omega-3 fatty acids in inflammation and autoimmune diseases [J]. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 2002, 21(6):495-505. |
41 | SAMI A S, AUGUSTINI C, SCHWARZ F J. Effect of feeding intensity and time on feed on intramuscular fatty acid composition of Simmental bulls [J]. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl), 2004, 88(5-6):179-187. |
42 | PRICE B D, GARMYN A J, DERINGTON H M, et al.. Effects of high-oil corn on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, fatty acid profiles, beef palatability, and retail case life traits of beef top loin steaks [J]. J. Anim. Sci., 2011, 89(3):809-816. |
[1] | 纪蕾, 刘天红, 王颖, 李晓, 李红艳, 姜晓东, 孙元芹, 张帅中. 糖基化对虹鳟鱼鱼松品质和挥发性风味特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(9): 159-172. |
[2] | 王翻兄, 徐英, 沙玉柱, 邵鹏阳, 谢转回, 李文浩, 王继卿, 李少斌, 陈小伟, 杨文鑫, 刘秀. 不同年龄藏绵羊肌肉脂肪酸特征分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 74-83. |
[3] | 蒋飞, 施永海, 徐嘉波, 严银龙, 刘永士, 袁新程. 2种饲料投喂下美洲鲥幼鱼肌肉营养成分分析及评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 223-233. |
[4] | 徐英, 任越, 沙玉柱, 蒲小宁, 郭新羽, 姚亮伟, 邵鹏阳, 王继卿, 李少斌, 刘秀. 不同海拔藏绵羊肉质脂肪酸特征分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 67-76. |
[5] | 安柯萌, 赵立欣, 姚宗路, 于佳动, 李再兴, 黄亚丽, 梁依, 申瑞霞. 秸秆高值利用合成中链脂肪酸研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(3): 198-211. |
[6] | 王颖, 李珺, 马力通, 曹晓冰. 黄腐植酸对泥炭产甲烷的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(1): 128-133. |
[7] | 白春玲, 杨磊, 苏广华, 魏著英, 王学侨, 朱琳, 周新宇, 海超, 吴迪, 刘雪霏, 武云喜, 张立, 李光鹏. FAT1转基因系祖公牛选育及其扩繁研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(9): 66-78. |
[8] | 翟利敏, 李文通, 冯政, 李华, 裴杨莉. 基因编辑猪的研究现状[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(8): 25-34. |
[9] | 李刚, 郑敏娜, 李荫藩. 饲用燕麦品种在晋北农牧交错区的生产性能和营养价值研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12): 42-53. |
[10] | 于洋, 张珏, 田海清, 王迪, 王轲, 张红旗. 基于高光谱成像技术的冷鲜羊肉嫩度检测方法研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12): 101-108. |
[11] | 王姮, 丁君. 海洋无脊椎动物多不饱和脂肪酸合成代谢机理研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(10): 181-191. |
[12] | 郭慧媛1,罗祎2,任发政1,3,孟兆祥2,范春林2,张沅4,庞国芳1,2*. 我国推行奶牛生产性能测定的可借鉴模式及对策[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(5): 1-11. |
[13] | 赵勇1,2,3,沈伟3,张宏福1*. 大气微粒、氨气和硫化氢影响动物繁殖机能和生产性能的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(4): 132-138. |
[14] | 王明利1,刘玉凤1,吕官旺2,石自忠3. 我国羊肉价格波动的周期测定及政策启示[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(2): 182-191. |
[15] | 彭忠利1,郭春华1*|柏雪1,朱万岭3|付锡三3,王永玲3. 微生物发酵饲料对乐至黑山羊生产性能、养分消化率与血液生化指标的影响[J]. , 2013, 15(5): 106-113. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||