Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 189-198.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0981
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Zitian PU1(), Hong WANG2, Bin ZHAO3, Xinxin WANG2(
)
Received:
2022-11-14
Accepted:
2022-12-15
Online:
2024-07-15
Published:
2024-07-12
Contact:
Xinxin WANG
通讯作者:
王鑫鑫
作者简介:
蒲子天 E-mail: 2922321598@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zitian PU, Hong WANG, Bin ZHAO, Xinxin WANG. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Growth of Scutellaria baicalensis and Soil Enzyme Activities in Continuous Cropping[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 189-198.
蒲子天, 王红, 赵斌, 王鑫鑫. 不同土壤改良物料对连作黄芩生长及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 189-198.
土壤改良物料 | 营养成分 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮N/(g·kg-1) | 五氧化二磷 P2O5/(mg·kg-1) | 氧化钾 K2O/(mg·kg-1) | 有机质 | pH | 水溶性盐 | 腐殖酸 Humic acid/% | |
蚯蚓粪 Vermicompost | 6.35 | 445 | 881 | 105.83 | 7.89 | 1.03 | 0 |
腐殖酸 Humic acid | 7.76 | 589 | 419 | 29.97 | 9.65 | 0.99 | ≥65 |
生物炭 Biochar | 8.76 | 221 | 972 | 217.75 | 10.10 | 1.04 | 0 |
Table 1 Nutrient contents of vermicompost, humic acid and biochar
土壤改良物料 | 营养成分 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮N/(g·kg-1) | 五氧化二磷 P2O5/(mg·kg-1) | 氧化钾 K2O/(mg·kg-1) | 有机质 | pH | 水溶性盐 | 腐殖酸 Humic acid/% | |
蚯蚓粪 Vermicompost | 6.35 | 445 | 881 | 105.83 | 7.89 | 1.03 | 0 |
腐殖酸 Humic acid | 7.76 | 589 | 419 | 29.97 | 9.65 | 0.99 | ≥65 |
生物炭 Biochar | 8.76 | 221 | 972 | 217.75 | 10.10 | 1.04 | 0 |
指标 Index | 土壤 Soil (df=1) | 物料处理 Treatment (df=5) | 土壤×物料处理 Soil×treatment (df=5) |
---|---|---|---|
地上部生物量Shoot biomass | 346.79*** | 34.21*** | 17.64*** |
根生物量 Root biomass | 298.14*** | 22.53*** | 14.92*** |
全氮含量 Total N content | 8.15** | 21.15*** | 3.21* |
全磷含量 Total P content | 16.57*** | 56.35*** | 8.07*** |
全钾含量 Total K content | 1.60 ns | 41.52*** | 2.92* |
蔗糖酶活性SA | 1 514.95*** | 199.64*** | 132.21*** |
脲酶活性UA | 566.14*** | 182.91*** | 412.40*** |
过氧化氢酶活性CA | 282.30*** | 776.65*** | 755.11*** |
碱性磷酸酶活性APA | 415.81*** | 856.26*** | 200.67*** |
Table 2 Two-factor ANOVA analysis of biomass, nutrient content and soil enzyme activity on treatment and soil of Scutellaria baicalensis (F value)
指标 Index | 土壤 Soil (df=1) | 物料处理 Treatment (df=5) | 土壤×物料处理 Soil×treatment (df=5) |
---|---|---|---|
地上部生物量Shoot biomass | 346.79*** | 34.21*** | 17.64*** |
根生物量 Root biomass | 298.14*** | 22.53*** | 14.92*** |
全氮含量 Total N content | 8.15** | 21.15*** | 3.21* |
全磷含量 Total P content | 16.57*** | 56.35*** | 8.07*** |
全钾含量 Total K content | 1.60 ns | 41.52*** | 2.92* |
蔗糖酶活性SA | 1 514.95*** | 199.64*** | 132.21*** |
脲酶活性UA | 566.14*** | 182.91*** | 412.40*** |
过氧化氢酶活性CA | 282.30*** | 776.65*** | 755.11*** |
碱性磷酸酶活性APA | 415.81*** | 856.26*** | 200.67*** |
Fig. 1 Shoot and root biomass of Scutellaria baicalensis in soils with different continuous cropping years under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in the same soil condition between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 2 Nutrient content of Scutellaria baicalensis in soils with different continuous cropping years underNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in same soil condition between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Soil enzyme activity in soils with different continuous cropping years underNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in same soil condition between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
指标 Index | 氮含量 NC | 磷含量 PC | 钾含量 KC | 蔗糖酶活性 SA | 脲酶活性 UA | 过氧化氢酶性CA | 碱性磷酸酶活性 APA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮含量NC | — | 0.72*** | 0.73*** | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.45** | 0.01 |
磷含量PC | 0.56*** | — | 0.63*** | 0.16 | -0.27*** | -0.37 | 0.25* |
钾含量KC | 0.47** | 0.36* | — | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.75*** | 0.08 |
蔗糖酶活性 SA | -0.32* | -0.11 | 0.36* | — | 0.02 | 0.41* | 0.03 |
脲酶活性 UA | -0.23 | -0.42* | 0.36* | 0.16 | — | 0.31* | -0.19 |
过氧化氢酶活性 CA | -0.06 | -0.47** | 0.23 | -0.22 | -0.26 | — | -0.10 |
碱性磷酸酶活性 APA | 0.34* | 0.07 | -0.24 | 0.37* | -0.10 | -0.33* | — |
Table 3 Correlation between nutrient contents of Scutellaria baicalensis and soil enzyme activities in soils with different continuous cropping years
指标 Index | 氮含量 NC | 磷含量 PC | 钾含量 KC | 蔗糖酶活性 SA | 脲酶活性 UA | 过氧化氢酶性CA | 碱性磷酸酶活性 APA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮含量NC | — | 0.72*** | 0.73*** | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.45** | 0.01 |
磷含量PC | 0.56*** | — | 0.63*** | 0.16 | -0.27*** | -0.37 | 0.25* |
钾含量KC | 0.47** | 0.36* | — | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.75*** | 0.08 |
蔗糖酶活性 SA | -0.32* | -0.11 | 0.36* | — | 0.02 | 0.41* | 0.03 |
脲酶活性 UA | -0.23 | -0.42* | 0.36* | 0.16 | — | 0.31* | -0.19 |
过氧化氢酶活性 CA | -0.06 | -0.47** | 0.23 | -0.22 | -0.26 | — | -0.10 |
碱性磷酸酶活性 APA | 0.34* | 0.07 | -0.24 | 0.37* | -0.10 | -0.33* | — |
Fig. 4 Principal component analysis of traits of Scutellaria baicalensis and soil enzyme activities in soil with different continuous cropping yearsNote: ShB—Shoot biomass;RB—Root biomass;NC—Total N content;PC—Total P content;KC—Total K content;SA—Sucrase activity;UA—Urease activity;CA—Catalase activity;APA—Alkaline phosphatase activity.
1 | 严铸云, 王海, 何彪, 等. 中药连作障碍防治的微生态研究模式探讨[J]. 中药与临床, 2012, 3(2): 5-9. |
YAN Z Y, WANG H, HE B, et al.. Study on controlling measurement for continuous cropping obstacle in traditional Chinese medicinal plants by microecological research model [J]. Pharmacy Clinics Chin. Materia Medica, 2012, 3(2): 5-9. | |
2 | 王田涛, 王琦, 王惠珍, 等. 当归自毒作用和其对不同作物的化感效应[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(6): 1132-1138. |
WANG T T, WANG Q, WANG H Z, et al.. Autotoxicity of Angelica sinensis and allelopathy on tested plants [J]. Acta Agrectia Sin., 2012, 20(6): 1132-1138. | |
3 | 王田涛. 间套种植对当归连作障碍的修复机理[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2013. |
WANG T T. Remediation mechanisms of intercropping patterns on continuous cropping obstacle of Angelica sinensis [D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2013. | |
4 | 刘垠霖. 连作年限对党参生长、土壤理化性状及酶活性的影响研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2021. |
LIU Y L. Effects of continuous cropping years on the growth of Codonopsis pilosula, soilphysical and chemical properties and enzyme activities [D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2021. | |
5 | 安艳. 半夏连作障碍影响因子研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018. |
AN Y. Study on the influence factors of continuous cropping obstruction of Pinellia ternata (Thunb.) Breit. [D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018. | |
6 | 何欢, 阎岩, 毛仁俊, 等. 黄芩种质资源评价及药理功效研究进展[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2022 [2022-10-13]. . |
HE H, YAN Y, MAO R J, et al.. Research advance of germplasm resource evaluation and pharmacological function of Scutellaria baicalensis [J/OL]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2022 [2022-10-13]. . | |
7 | 杨全, 白音, 陈千良, 等. 黄芩资源现状及可持续利用的研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2006,17 (7): 1159-1160. |
YANG Q, BAI Y, CHEN Q L, et al.. The resource investigation and continual utilization of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi [J]. Lishizhen Med. Materia Med. Res., 2006, 17(7): 1159-1160. | |
8 | 王小花, 闫昌誉, 余桂媛, 等. 黄芩抗病毒作用的研究进展及临床应用[J]. 今日药学, 2021, 31(11): 874-880. |
WANG X H, YAN C Y, YU G Y, et al.. Research progress and clinical application of Scutellaria baicalensis against viral infection [J]. Pharmacy Today, 2021, 31(11): 874-880. | |
9 | 金毅力. 药用植物黄芩(Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi)他感作用的初步研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2010. |
JIN Y L. Preliminary studies on the allelopathy of medicinal plant Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2010. | |
10 | 张菁,江山,王改玲.安太堡露天矿不同复垦年限苜蓿地土壤养分和酶活性剖面特征[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(1): 42-48. |
ZHANG Q, JIANG S, WANG G L. Soil profile characteristics of soil nutrients and enzyme activity after reclaiming alfafa in Antaibao opencast coal mine [J]. J. Irrig. Drain., 2018, 37(1): 42-48. | |
11 | UZOMA K C, INOUE M, ANDRY H, et al.. Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition [J]. Soil Use Manage., 2011, 27(2): 205-212. |
12 | MUSCOLO A, SIDARI M, ATTINA E, et al.. Biological activity of humic substances is related to their chemical structure [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2007, 71(1): 75-85. |
13 | JONGMANS A G, PULLEMAN M M, BALABANE M, et al.. Soil structure and characteristics of organic matter in two orchards differing in earthworm activity [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2003, 24(3): 219-232. |
14 | LIM S L, WU T, LIM P, et al.. The use of vermicompost in organic farming: overview, effects on soil and economics [J]. J. Sci. Food Agric., 2015, 95(6): 1143-1156. |
15 | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第3版. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2000: 1-495. |
16 | 马丽, 郭学良, 齐红志, 等. 生物炭对连作草莓光合特性及光响应的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35(2): 72-78. |
MA L, GUO X L, QI H Z, et al.. Effects of biochar andditio on photosynthetic characteristics and photoresponse of continuous-cropping strawberry [J]. J. Northwest For. Univ., 2020, 35(2): 72-78. | |
17 | 田给林, 张潞生. 蚯蚓粪缓解草莓连作土壤障碍的作用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3): 759-767. |
TIAN G L, ZHANG L S. Alleviation of vermicompost to obstacle in sterilized continuous cropping soil in strawberry productio [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2016, 22(3): 759-767. | |
18 | 柏彦超, 周雄飞, 赵学辉, 等. 蚓粪基质克服西瓜连作障碍的应用效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(8): 212-216. |
BAI Y C, ZHOU X F, ZHAO X H, et al.. Solving successive cropping problems with the application of warm cast substrates in watermelon cultivation [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2011, 27(8): 212-216. | |
19 | 胡佩, 刘德辉, 胡锋, 等. 蚓粪中的植物激素及其对绿豆插条不定根发生的促进作用[J]. 生态学报, 2002,22 (8): 1211-1214. |
HU P, LIU D H, HU F, et al.. Plant hormones in earthworm casts and their promotion on adventitious root formation of mung bean cutting [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2002, 22(8): 1211-1214. | |
20 | 丁守鹏, 张国新, 姚玉涛, 等. 蚯蚓粪生物炭配施对盐碱地设施番茄生长及光合作用的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(18): 60-67. |
DING S P, ZHANG G X, YAO Y T, et al.. Effects of combined application of earthworm manure and biochar on protected tomato growth and photosynthesis in saline-alkali soils [J]. Northern Hortic., 2021 (18): 60-67. | |
21 | 董林林, 何建桥, 陆长婴, 等. 生物质炭配施蚯蚓粪提升土壤有机碳对水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021 (2): 87-95. |
DONG L L, HE J Q, LU C Y, et al.. Effect of increased soil organic carbon on rice growth by biochar and wormcast combined application [J]. Soils Fert. Sci. China, 2021 (2): 87-95. | |
22 | 孙喜军, 吕爽, 高莹, 等. 蚯蚓粪对作物连作障碍抑制作用研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(4): 676-684. |
SUN X J, LYU S, GAO Y, et al.. Research progresses on inhibition effect of vermicompost to continuous cropping obstacles [J]. Soils, 2020, 52(4): 676-684. | |
23 | 才吉卓玛, 翟丽梅, 习斌, 等. 生物炭对不同类型土壤中Olsen-P和CaCl2-P的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(1): 163-168. |
Caijizhuoma, ZHAI L M, XI B, et al.. Effect of boichar on Olsen-P and CaCl2-P in different types of soil [J]. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2014, 45(1): 163-168. | |
24 | 倪杰强. 不同生物碳对滴灌棉田土壤磷素及磷肥利用率影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2015. |
NI J Q. Effects of biochar on soil P content and P use efficiency in drip irrigation cotton field [D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2015. | |
25 | 刘畅, 贺浩强, 王茜, 等. 腐植酸和生物炭配施对饲用甜高粱生长与土壤磷素吸收状况的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2019, 25(7): 69-72, 78. |
LIU C, HE H Q, WANG Q, et al.. Effects of combined application of humic acid and biochar on feed-sweet sorghum growth and soil phosphorus uptake [J]. Tianjin Agric. Sci., 2019, 25(7): 69-72, 78. | |
26 | XING B S, LIU J D, LIU X D, et al.. Extraction and characterization of humic acids and humin fractions from a black soil of China [J]. Pedosphere, 2005, 15(1): 1-8. |
27 | MARCELO M J, KEVIN K J.Disaggregation kinetics of a peat humic acid:mechanism and pH effects [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2002, 36: 5100-5105. |
28 | CIESLEWICZ J, GONET S S.Properties of humic acids as biomarkets of lake catchment management [J]. Aquatic Sci., 2004, 66: 178-184. |
29 | KAY C M, PORTER J F.Equilibrium parameters for the sorption of copper, cadmium and zinc irons onto peat [J]. J. Chem. Teachnol. Biotechnol., 1997, 69: 309-320. |
30 | CHAOUI H I, ZIBILSKE L M, OHNO T. Effects of earthworm casts and compost on soil microbial activity andplant nutrient availability [J]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2003, 35(2): 295-302. |
31 | 和文祥, 朱铭莪, 张一平. 土壤酶与重金属关系的研究现状[J]. 土壤与环境, 2000, 9(2): 139-142. |
HE W X, ZHU M E, ZHANG Y P. Recent advance in relationship between soil enzymes and heavy metals [J]. Soil Environ. Sci., 2000,9 (2): 139-142. |
[1] | Yongjun XIE, Xiaozhuo PAN, Fuhui CHEN, Kaibo YIN, Jiayue JIN, Yibing WANG. Screening, Identification and Biocontrol of Bacteria Degrading Ginseng Phenolic Acid Autotoxic Substances [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 147-155. |
[2] | Hao WANG, Pengjie JIN, Shan GAO, Mingxuan ZHAO, Changai ZHANG, Shengdao SHAN. Effect of Additives on Stability Immersed in Water of Biochar Based Long-acting Fertilizer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 174-182. |
[3] | Yanbo FU, Bingbing LENG, Qingyong BIAN, Zhiduo DONG, Guohong LIU, Haifeng LI, Yunmeng WEN, Wenbo GUO, Wanxu ZHANG. Passivation Effect of Biochar on Soil Cadmium Pollution and Rape Growth [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 183-190. |
[4] | Yuxin CHEN, Hongmei ZHAO, Weijun YANG, Mei YANG, Song GUO, Shilong SONG, Chao HUI. Effects of Biochar on Soil Microbial Carbon Source Utilization and Spring Wheat Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 174-183. |
[5] | Ling LIN, Yujie ZHU, Lei FENG, Guangmu TANG, Yunshu ZHANG, Wanli XU. Effects of Aged Cotton Straw Biochars on Soil Properties and Nitrogen Utilization of Wheat [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 184-191. |
[6] | Yahong ZHAO, Qianyu HU, Rong XIA, Zhijiang WANG, Yonghui XIE, Xianwen YE, Lei YU, Ying QI, Shaowu YANG, Zhiqin XUE, Zhixing WU, Feiyan HUANG, Tianhua HAN. Effects of Biochar Fertilizer on Rhizosphere Flora and Physicochemical Properties of Flue-cured Tobacco Susceptible to Root Knot Nematode [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 206-214. |
[7] | Jiayu HU, Yang YANG, Hongyan ZHANG, Bingyang GAO, Linglu WANG, Junying YAN, Xiaomei SUN, Yanan ZHAO, Youliang YE. Effect of Topdressing Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Intercropped Peanut with Wheat [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 191-197. |
[8] | Jing GAO, Minggang XU, Ran LI, Zejiang CAI, Nan SUN, Qiang ZHANG, Lei ZHENG. Effects of Biochar Application on Soil pH: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 186-196. |
[9] | Hongyuan LIU, Zhihua ZHOU, Guangxin ZHAO, Qinrui SHEN. Effects of Long-term Biochar Application on Greenhouse Gas Emission and Its Temporal Effect in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 178-186. |
[10] | Xudong WANG, Xuebing REN, Shu TANG, Qin GUO, Mengyao XUE, Peng JIN, Yunhua ZHANG. Application of Sludge Biochar in Soil Improvement [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 165-173. |
[11] | PANG Zhe, WANG Qilong, LI Juan. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties, Rice Yield and Economic Benefits in Low-lying Saline Alkali Land in Northern Shaanxi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 174-180. |
[12] | Jia YAO, Jiaxin LIU, Yan SU, Xiaojuan SU. Effects of Combined Application of Tobacco Stem Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizers on Corn Growth and Soil Properties in Seeding Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 140-151. |
[13] | Yunfei LIU, Fengjie WEI, Maolin XIA, Zhaojin YU, Hao XIA, Chunyu YI, Jianbo CHANG, Xiaoming JI. Alleviative Effect of New Composite Hydrogels on Cadmium Stress Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 188-197. |
[14] | Ling YANG, Fucang ZHANG, Xin SUN, Shaohui ZHANG, Haidong WANG, Ahmed Elsayed ABDELGHANY, Zhanfei CHEN, Yuchuan FANG. Effects of Biochar and Drip Irrigation Amounts on Soil Properties and Growth of Potato in Blown-sand Region of Northern Yulin, Shaanxi Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 221-233. |
[15] | Yunzhu ZHENG, Shuchen SUN. Effects of Straw Biochar and Straw on Soil Nutrients and Crop Yield in Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 152-162. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||