Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 200-205.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0136
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Shouhua PENG1(), Mingming XU1, Jiqiang WEI1, Lijun LIANG1, Quan YE1, Xiaoyuan CHI2, Shaofeng ZHANG3, Xiangli DONG4(
)
Received:
2023-02-28
Accepted:
2023-05-08
Online:
2024-06-15
Published:
2024-06-12
Contact:
Xiangli DONG
彭守华1(), 许铭铭1, 尉继强1, 梁丽君1, 叶全1, 迟晓元2, 张少峰3, 董向丽4(
)
通讯作者:
董向丽
作者简介:
彭守华 E-mail: whnkypsh@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Shouhua PENG, Mingming XU, Jiqiang WEI, Lijun LIANG, Quan YE, Xiaoyuan CHI, Shaofeng ZHANG, Xiangli DONG. Effects of Increase Applying of Biofertilizer Strain FBR1 on Growth Development and Yield of Peanut[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 200-205.
彭守华, 许铭铭, 尉继强, 梁丽君, 叶全, 迟晓元, 张少峰, 董向丽. 生物菌肥FBR1不同施用方式对花生生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 200-205.
处理 Treatment | 出苗期 Seedling stage(m/d) | 出苗率 Seedling rate/% | 花期 Flowering period/d | 成熟期 Mature period(m/d) | 实收穴数 Number of actual received |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 5/30 | 98.91 aAB | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 166.00 aA |
CK2 | 5/30 | 99.40 aA | 36.67 aA | 9/28 | 165.00 abAB |
T1 | 5/30 | 99.30 aAB | 38.00 aA | 9/28 | 165.33 abA |
T2 | 5/30 | 98.71 abAB | 38.00 aA | 9/28 | 164.00 abcAB |
T3 | 5/30 | 98.51 bB | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 163.33 bA |
T4 | 5/30 | 99.21 aA | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 159.33 cB |
Table 1 Fertility, seedling emergence and plant establishment of Huayu 9113 under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 出苗期 Seedling stage(m/d) | 出苗率 Seedling rate/% | 花期 Flowering period/d | 成熟期 Mature period(m/d) | 实收穴数 Number of actual received |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 5/30 | 98.91 aAB | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 166.00 aA |
CK2 | 5/30 | 99.40 aA | 36.67 aA | 9/28 | 165.00 abAB |
T1 | 5/30 | 99.30 aAB | 38.00 aA | 9/28 | 165.33 abA |
T2 | 5/30 | 98.71 abAB | 38.00 aA | 9/28 | 164.00 abcAB |
T3 | 5/30 | 98.51 bB | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 163.33 bA |
T4 | 5/30 | 99.21 aA | 37.33 aA | 9/28 | 159.33 cB |
处理 Treatment | 主茎高 Main stem height /cm | 侧枝长Lateral branch length/cm | 总分枝数 No. of total branches | 结果枝数 No. of podding branches | 有效分枝比例Effective branching ratio/% | 总果针数 No. of total pod needle | 无效果针数 No. of no effect needle | 有效果针比例 Ratio of effect needle/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 69.40 abAB | 74.57 aA | 8.03 aA | 6.23 aA | 77.40 aA | 33.10 aA | 14.57 aA | 56.05 aA |
CK2 | 68.83 aA | 71.50 aA | 8.60 aA | 6.53 aA | 75.99 aA | 30.40 aA | 12.40 aA | 59.30 aA |
T1 | 69.03 aAB | 73.37 aA | 8.37 aA | 6.33 aA | 75.64 aA | 33.50 aA | 13.20 aA | 60.71 aA |
T2 | 70.47 aA | 74.53 aA | 8.27 aA | 6.40 aA | 77.15 aA | 34.57 aA | 14.90 aA | 57.01 aA |
T3 | 67.53 abAB | 73.33 aA | 8.57 aA | 6.40 aA | 74.77 aA | 30.93 aA | 11.70 aA | 62.27 aA |
T4 | 65.43 bB | 71.07 aA | 8.27 aA | 6.30 aA | 76.17 aA | 30.93 aA | 12.40 aA | 59.56 aA |
Table 2 Plant development of Huayu 9113 under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 主茎高 Main stem height /cm | 侧枝长Lateral branch length/cm | 总分枝数 No. of total branches | 结果枝数 No. of podding branches | 有效分枝比例Effective branching ratio/% | 总果针数 No. of total pod needle | 无效果针数 No. of no effect needle | 有效果针比例 Ratio of effect needle/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 69.40 abAB | 74.57 aA | 8.03 aA | 6.23 aA | 77.40 aA | 33.10 aA | 14.57 aA | 56.05 aA |
CK2 | 68.83 aA | 71.50 aA | 8.60 aA | 6.53 aA | 75.99 aA | 30.40 aA | 12.40 aA | 59.30 aA |
T1 | 69.03 aAB | 73.37 aA | 8.37 aA | 6.33 aA | 75.64 aA | 33.50 aA | 13.20 aA | 60.71 aA |
T2 | 70.47 aA | 74.53 aA | 8.27 aA | 6.40 aA | 77.15 aA | 34.57 aA | 14.90 aA | 57.01 aA |
T3 | 67.53 abAB | 73.33 aA | 8.57 aA | 6.40 aA | 74.77 aA | 30.93 aA | 11.70 aA | 62.27 aA |
T4 | 65.43 bB | 71.07 aA | 8.27 aA | 6.30 aA | 76.17 aA | 30.93 aA | 12.40 aA | 59.56 aA |
处理 Treatment | 饱果数 No. of full pods | 双饱果数 No. of double full pods | 秕果数 No. of blighted pod | 总果数 No. of total pod | 百果重 100-pod weight/g | 百仁重 100-seed weight/g | 千克果数No. of kilogram pods | 千克仁数No. of kilogram seeds | 出仁率 Kernel rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 14.67 abA | 6.93 aA | 3.83 aA | 18.53 abA | 228.90 aA | 83.83 aA | 590 aA | 1 226 aA | 66.40 aA |
CK2 | 13.73 bA | 6.03 aA | 4.23 aA | 18.00 bA | 223.05 aA | 86.39 aA | 599 aA | 1 269 aA | 65.42 aA |
T1 | 16.00 aA | 7.83 aA | 4.30 aA | 20.30 aA | 231.31 aA | 81.59 aA | 603 aA | 1 229 aA | 66.05 aA |
T2 | 14.73 abA | 6.87 aA | 4.67 aA | 19.67 abA | 234.08 aA | 84.82 aA | 597 aA | 1 235 aA | 65.89 aA |
T3 | 14.83 abA | 7.33 aA | 4.40 aA | 19.23 abA | 229.33 aA | 82.66 aA | 597 aA | 1 248 aA | 66.18 aA |
T4 | 14.63 abA | 6.83 aA | 3.77 aA | 18.43 abA | 229.00 aA | 82.60 aA | 594 aA | 1 365 aA | 65.88 aA |
Table 3 Pod development of Huayu 9113 under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 饱果数 No. of full pods | 双饱果数 No. of double full pods | 秕果数 No. of blighted pod | 总果数 No. of total pod | 百果重 100-pod weight/g | 百仁重 100-seed weight/g | 千克果数No. of kilogram pods | 千克仁数No. of kilogram seeds | 出仁率 Kernel rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 14.67 abA | 6.93 aA | 3.83 aA | 18.53 abA | 228.90 aA | 83.83 aA | 590 aA | 1 226 aA | 66.40 aA |
CK2 | 13.73 bA | 6.03 aA | 4.23 aA | 18.00 bA | 223.05 aA | 86.39 aA | 599 aA | 1 269 aA | 65.42 aA |
T1 | 16.00 aA | 7.83 aA | 4.30 aA | 20.30 aA | 231.31 aA | 81.59 aA | 603 aA | 1 229 aA | 66.05 aA |
T2 | 14.73 abA | 6.87 aA | 4.67 aA | 19.67 abA | 234.08 aA | 84.82 aA | 597 aA | 1 235 aA | 65.89 aA |
T3 | 14.83 abA | 7.33 aA | 4.40 aA | 19.23 abA | 229.33 aA | 82.66 aA | 597 aA | 1 248 aA | 66.18 aA |
T4 | 14.63 abA | 6.83 aA | 3.77 aA | 18.43 abA | 229.00 aA | 82.60 aA | 594 aA | 1 365 aA | 65.88 aA |
处理 Treatment | 果针重 Pod needle weight/g | 秸秆重 Straw weight /g | 荚果重 Pod weight/g | 总干重 Total dry weight/g | 收获指数Harvest index/% | 小区荚果 产量 Small plot pod yield/kg | 荚果产量 Pod yield/ (kg·hm-2) | 小区籽仁 产量 Small plot seed yield/kg | 籽仁产量 Seed yield/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 1.67 aA | 20.36 aA | 24.65 bA | 46.69 bB | 52.67 aA | 7.97 aA | 5 975.22 aA | 5.30 aA | 3 971.82 aA |
CK2 | 1.65 aA | 20.49 aA | 23.33 bA | 45.47 bB | 51.27 aA | 7.67 aA | 5 750.40 aA | 5.02 aA | 3 761.99 aA |
T1 | 2.20 aA | 21.74 aA | 28.67 aA | 52.60 aA | 54.51 aA | 8.09 aA | 6 060.15 aA | 5.34 aA | 4 004.30 aA |
T2 | 2.08 aA | 21.18 aA | 25.65 bA | 48.91 bB | 52.41 aA | 7.86 aA | 5 890.29 aA | 5.19 aA | 3 889.39 aA |
T3 | 1.81 aA | 19.90 aA | 25.32 bA | 47.03 bB | 53.76 aA | 8.02 aA | 6 010.19 aA | 5.31 aA | 3 976.82 aA |
T4 | 1.80 aA | 19.56 aA | 25.99 abA | 47.35 bB | 54.80 aA | 7.55 aA | 5 657.98 aA | 4.98 aA | 3 729.52 aA |
Table 4 Dry matter distribution and yield of Huayu 9113 under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 果针重 Pod needle weight/g | 秸秆重 Straw weight /g | 荚果重 Pod weight/g | 总干重 Total dry weight/g | 收获指数Harvest index/% | 小区荚果 产量 Small plot pod yield/kg | 荚果产量 Pod yield/ (kg·hm-2) | 小区籽仁 产量 Small plot seed yield/kg | 籽仁产量 Seed yield/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 1.67 aA | 20.36 aA | 24.65 bA | 46.69 bB | 52.67 aA | 7.97 aA | 5 975.22 aA | 5.30 aA | 3 971.82 aA |
CK2 | 1.65 aA | 20.49 aA | 23.33 bA | 45.47 bB | 51.27 aA | 7.67 aA | 5 750.40 aA | 5.02 aA | 3 761.99 aA |
T1 | 2.20 aA | 21.74 aA | 28.67 aA | 52.60 aA | 54.51 aA | 8.09 aA | 6 060.15 aA | 5.34 aA | 4 004.30 aA |
T2 | 2.08 aA | 21.18 aA | 25.65 bA | 48.91 bB | 52.41 aA | 7.86 aA | 5 890.29 aA | 5.19 aA | 3 889.39 aA |
T3 | 1.81 aA | 19.90 aA | 25.32 bA | 47.03 bB | 53.76 aA | 8.02 aA | 6 010.19 aA | 5.31 aA | 3 976.82 aA |
T4 | 1.80 aA | 19.56 aA | 25.99 abA | 47.35 bB | 54.80 aA | 7.55 aA | 5 657.98 aA | 4.98 aA | 3 729.52 aA |
1 | 孙海艳,侯乾,董文召,等.我国花生品种发展现状[J].中国种业,2022(7):15-17. |
2 | 迟晓元,许静,潘丽娟,等.不同花生种质荚果力学特性研究[J].花生学报,2022,51(4):18-28. |
CHI X Y, XU J, PAN L J, et al.. Study on pod mechanical properties of different peanut germplasms [J]. J. Peanut Sci., 2022,51(4):18-28. | |
3 | 林倩,陈康,王永丽,等.烟台地区花生新品种试验示范[J].中国种业,2023(1):68-72. |
4 | 威海市地方史志办公室.威海年鉴2015[M].北京:方志出版社,2015:125. |
5 | 威海市地方史志办公室.威海年鉴2017[M].北京:方志出版社,2017,135. |
6 | 叶全,陈洪江.威海耕地[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2019:189-191. |
7 | 孟瑶,徐凤花,孟庆有,等.中国微生物肥料研究及应用进展[J].中国农学通报, 2008,24(6):276-283. |
MENG Y, XU F H, MENG Q Y, et al.. Current application status and prospect of microbiological fertilizer in China [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2008,24(6):276-283. | |
8 | 陈建生,李文金,康涛,等.花生上生物菌肥替代化肥减施增效技术研究[J].山东农业科学,2021,53(7):73-76. |
CHEN J S, LI W J, KANG T, et al.. Technique study on reducing application and increasing efficiency of peanut biological bacterial fertilizer instead of chemical fertilizer [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2021,53(7):73-76. | |
9 | 胡亚杰,韦建玉,卢健,等.枯草芽孢杆菌在农作物生产上的应用研究进展[J].作物研究,2019,33(2):167-172. |
HU Y J, WEI J Y, LU J, et al.. Research progress of Bacillus subtilis application in crops production [J]. Crop Res., 2019,33(2):167-172. | |
10 | 孙海艳,李荣德,史梦雅,等. 农作物品种试验规范 油料作物: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021. |
11 | 吴丽青,曲杰,程亮,等.不同种植密度对高油酸花生机收特性及产量的影响[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(5):47-50. |
WU L Q, QU J, CHENG L, et al.. Effects of different planting densities on high-oleic acid peanut yield and machanized harvest characteristics [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2020,52(5):47-50. | |
12 | 李峰,张甜,王铭伦,等.化肥减量配施生物肥对花生衰老特性、干物质积累及肥料利用效率的影响[J].花生学报,2022,51(1):9-16. |
LI F, ZHANG T, WANG M L, et al.. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer on peanut senescence characteristics, dry matter accumulation and fertilizer utilization efficiency [J]. J. Peanut Sci., 2022,51(1):9-16. | |
13 | 侯睿,张小红,张小军,等.生物菌肥在花生上施用效果的研究[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(8):78-83. |
HOU R, ZHANG X H, ZHANG X J, et al.. The application effect of biological bacterial fertilizer on peanut [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2017,33(8):78-83. | |
14 | 彭守华,尉继强,董向丽,等.花生施用不同菌肥的效应研究[J].农业科技通讯,2018(5):130-132. |
15 | 汤丰收,张新友,张俊,等.高油、高产花生新品种豫花9326抗旱生理特性及生产适应性研究[J].花生学报,2014,43(3):7-12. |
TANG F S, ZHANG X Y, ZHANG J, et al.. Research on physiological characteristics of drought resistance and productive adaptability of new peanut variety Yuhua 9326 with high oil and high yield [J]. J. Peanut Sci., 2014,43(3):7-12. | |
16 | 甄志高,王晓林,段莹,等.不同种植密度对花生产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2004,20(2):90-91. |
ZHEN Z G, WANG X L, DUAN Y, et al.. Effect of different planting density on yield in peanut [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2004,20(2):90-91. | |
17 | 杨清夏,李欢,龙光强,等.基于有机肥和菌肥的玉米减肥增效研究[J].生态科学,2022,41(4):196-203. |
YANG Q X, LI H, LONG G Q, et al.. Study on reducing fertilizer and increasing use efficiency of maize based on organic fertilizer and bacterial fertilizer [J]. Ecol. Sci.,2022,41(4):196-203. | |
18 | 于占东,刘云峰,温丹,等.有机肥配施生物菌肥对设施蔬菜土壤改良及面条菜生长、品质的影响[J].山东农业科学,2022,54(8):99-103. |
YU Z D, LIU Y F, WEN D, et al.. Effects of organic fertilizer combined with biological bacterial fertilizer on facility soil improvement and growth and quality of Silene conoidea L. [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2022,54(8):99-103. | |
19 | 肖孔操,刘杏梅,吴建军,等. 植物残体与土壤pH对农田土壤呼吸的影响研究[C]//面向未来的土壤科学(下册)——中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集. 中国土壤学会,2012:499-500. |
20 | 阎世江,李照全,张治家.生物菌肥的研究现状与应用[J].北方园艺,2017(5):189-192. |
YAN S J, LI Z Q, ZHANG Z J. Research status and application of bacterial manure [J]. Northern Hortic., 2017(5):189-192. | |
21 | 刘亚东,刘景辉,卿香玉,等.生物菌肥对燕麦叶片生理特性及产量的影响[J].北方农业学报,2019,47(3):58-63. |
LIU Y D, LIU J H, QING X Y, et al.. Effect of the compound microbial fertilizer on the physiological characteristics and yield of oats [J]. J. Northern Agric., 2019,47(3):58-63. | |
22 | (日)比嘉照夫.农用与环保微生物[M].广州:广东世界图书出版公司,1999:8-11, 17. |
[1] | Yukun QIN, Junying CHEN, Lijuan ZHANG. Response of Dry Matter Accumulation Characteristics and Yield of Cotton in North Jiangxi Cotton Region to Nitrogen Reduction Measures [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 191-199. |
[2] | Yuxin CHEN, Hongmei ZHAO, Weijun YANG, Mei YANG, Song GUO, Shilong SONG, Chao HUI. Effects of Biochar on Soil Microbial Carbon Source Utilization and Spring Wheat Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 174-183. |
[3] | Limin GAO, Zechen GU, Xuefei GONG, Lianming CUI, Dongsen GUO, Ying ZHOU, Lin WANG, Qishun WEI. Effects of Grass Growing on the Productivity of Orchard-Soil System in China: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 184-194. |
[4] | Dongsheng AN, Chengming YAN, Yang LIU, Baoshan ZHAO, Ran KONG, Junbo SU, Zhijun XU. Production Analysis and Selection of Suitable Varieties in Sugarcane Intercropping System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 37-45. |
[5] | Rigui ASHEN, Rongping ZHANG, Ningning ZHOU, Tingyu FENG, Lin ZHOU, Peng MA, Lise AER, Xuehuan LIAO, Keyuan ZHANG. Effects of Silicon, Calcium, Potassium and Magnesium Fertilizer and Density on Rice Yield Formation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 155-163. |
[6] | Gang ZHAO, Shuying WANG, Shangzhong LI, Jianjun ZHANG, Yi DANG, Lei WANG, Xingmao LI, Wanli CHENG, Gang ZHOU, Shengli NI, Tinglu FAN. Effects of Precipitation on Yield and Water Consumption of Winter Wheat in Loess Plateau in Recent 40 Years [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 164-173. |
[7] | Zhongyi LI, Hongqin TANG, Wenbin DONG, Caihui WEI, Tieguang HE. Effects of Co-incorporation of Rice Straw and Chinese Milk Vetch on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 171-180. |
[8] | Jiayu HU, Yang YANG, Hongyan ZHANG, Bingyang GAO, Linglu WANG, Junying YAN, Xiaomei SUN, Yanan ZHAO, Youliang YE. Effect of Topdressing Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Growth and Yield of Intercropped Peanut with Wheat [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 191-197. |
[9] | Hui WANG, Hongyu FU, Yunkai YUE, Guoxian CUI, Wei SHE. Ramie Yield SSA-BP Prediction Model Based on Climate Variables [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 110-118. |
[10] | Yanfei FANG, Xiaoying LUO, Jianghua TANG, Tingting SUN, Luzhen WANG, Tian TANG, Wenxiu XU. Effects of Sowing Methods on Yield, Dry Matter and Water Use Efficiency of Spring Wheat in Dryland [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 173-181. |
[11] | Shengyan YANG, Man CAO, Baoshi GUO, Chao YANG, Zhixia HOU. Effects of Different Iron Environments on the Growth and Leaf Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Blueberry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 52-62. |
[12] | Yuanyuan DUAN, Xiaohong LIU, Tao TANG, Fanfan WANG, Jingmao YOU, Xiaoliang GUO, Jie GUO. Effects of Planting Density on Growth and Quality of Fritillaria hupehensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 197-206. |
[13] | Ying ZHOU, Jingyong LI, Linxiu DAI, Dicai AO, Ziyi LI, Fan YANG, Junwei GU, Qiang XU, Zhi DOU, Hui GAO. Effect of Melatonin Spraying on Rice Yield Formation and Lodging Resistance Under Rice-Crayfish Coculture Mode [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 34-42. |
[14] | Wei WANG, Qiang ZHAO, Abuduaini Munire·, Alimu·Amuli, Xinxin LI, Yangqing TIAN. Effects of Different Exogenous Substances on Chemical Capping and Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 57-68. |
[15] | Chenyang ZHANG, Minggang XU, Fei WANG, Ran LI, Nan SUN. Effects of Manure Application on Soybean Yield and Soil Nutrients in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 148-156. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||