Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 60-70.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0391
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Gang LEI(), Rong FANG(
), Kunhua ZHOU, Xuejun CHEN, Xinjie YUAN, Yueqin HUANG, Gege LI, Yuanyuan XIE, Xiaomin SONG
Received:
2023-05-22
Accepted:
2023-08-25
Online:
2025-03-15
Published:
2025-03-14
Contact:
Rong FANG
雷刚(), 方荣(
), 周坤华, 陈学军, 袁欣捷, 黄月琴, 李歌歌, 谢媛媛, 宋小民
通讯作者:
方荣
作者简介:
雷刚E-mail:leixxgang@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Gang LEI, Rong FANG, Kunhua ZHOU, Xuejun CHEN, Xinjie YUAN, Yueqin HUANG, Gege LI, Yuanyuan XIE, Xiaomin SONG. Establishment of Comprehensive Evaluation System of Pepper Germplasm Resources on Heat Tolerance at Seedling Stage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 60-70.
雷刚, 方荣, 周坤华, 陈学军, 袁欣捷, 黄月琴, 李歌歌, 谢媛媛, 宋小民. 辣椒种质资源苗期耐热性综合评价体系的建立[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 60-70.
处理 Treatment | 丙二醛 MDA/ (nmol·g-1) | 可溶性蛋白 SP/ (mg·g-1) | 脯氨酸 Pro/ (mg·g-1) | 可溶性糖 SS/ (mg·g-1) | 过氧化物酶 POD/ (U·g-1) | 相对电导率 REC/ % | 过氧化氢酶 CAT/ (U·g-1) | 叶绿素 CC/ (mg·g-1) | 株高 PH/cm | 茎粗 SD/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高温HT | 20.25±3.04 | 18.92±3.13 | 6.84±3.03 | 32.51±7.98 | 44.54±10.38 | 0.39±0.06 | 38.65±6.65 | 2.33±0.31 | 5.11±1.37 | 2.94±0.49 |
常温NT | 14.69±2.76 | 12.36±2.77 | 4.08±2.27 | 14.44±4.77 | 23.96±7.67 | 0.35±0.06 | 24.36±5.17 | 2.27±0.27 | 5.53±1.25 | 3.07±0.52 |
差值Difference | 5.56** | 6.56** | 2.76** | 18.07** | 10.48** | 0.04** | 14.29** | -0.06 | -0.42* | 0.13 |
Table 1 Morphology and physiological indexes of pepper under high temperature stress at seedling stage
处理 Treatment | 丙二醛 MDA/ (nmol·g-1) | 可溶性蛋白 SP/ (mg·g-1) | 脯氨酸 Pro/ (mg·g-1) | 可溶性糖 SS/ (mg·g-1) | 过氧化物酶 POD/ (U·g-1) | 相对电导率 REC/ % | 过氧化氢酶 CAT/ (U·g-1) | 叶绿素 CC/ (mg·g-1) | 株高 PH/cm | 茎粗 SD/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
高温HT | 20.25±3.04 | 18.92±3.13 | 6.84±3.03 | 32.51±7.98 | 44.54±10.38 | 0.39±0.06 | 38.65±6.65 | 2.33±0.31 | 5.11±1.37 | 2.94±0.49 |
常温NT | 14.69±2.76 | 12.36±2.77 | 4.08±2.27 | 14.44±4.77 | 23.96±7.67 | 0.35±0.06 | 24.36±5.17 | 2.27±0.27 | 5.53±1.25 | 3.07±0.52 |
差值Difference | 5.56** | 6.56** | 2.76** | 18.07** | 10.48** | 0.04** | 14.29** | -0.06 | -0.42* | 0.13 |
组别 Group | 材料编号 Material No. | 可溶性糖 SS | 可溶性蛋白 SP | 过氧化物酶 POD | 过氧化氢酶 CAT | 脯氨酸 Pro | 丙二醛MDA | 相对电导率 REC | 株高 PH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1组 Group 1 | WY86 | 3.141 | 1.458 | 0.932 | 2.210 | 3.408 | 0.945 | 0.909 | 0.763 |
C031 | 1.495 | 1.662 | 1.040 | 0.873 | 1.687 | 0.528 | 0.752 | 0.917 | |
WY14 | 3.074 | 1.074 | 2.249 | 2.282 | 3.315 | 0.931 | 0.881 | 0.613 | |
B048 | 2.251 | 1.551 | 1.394 | 2.751 | 2.309 | 0.706 | 0.897 | 0.982 | |
C134 | 2.094 | 1.827 | 1.988 | 1.758 | 3.164 | 0.770 | 0.980 | 0.772 | |
B410 | 2.581 | 1.879 | 1.105 | 2.232 | 2.030 | 0.535 | 0.825 | 0.907 | |
C099 | 1.867 | 1.299 | 2.554 | 2.048 | 3.196 | 0.642 | 0.868 | 0.646 | |
A264 | 2.988 | 1.746 | 2.106 | 2.396 | 2.686 | 0.811 | 0.937 | 0.807 | |
WY69 | 1.180 | 1.246 | 0.856 | 0.069 | 1.383 | 0.624 | 0.747 | 0.813 | |
A162 | 1.938 | 1.184 | 1.222 | 2.011 | 1.643 | 0.735 | 0.895 | 0.891 | |
WY231 | 1.702 | 1.690 | 2.077 | 2.053 | 3.716 | 0.629 | 0.818 | 0.685 | |
C002 | 3.775 | 2.608 | 2.280 | 3.179 | 3.278 | 0.871 | 0.961 | 0.728 | |
A134 | 3.071 | 1.075 | 1.211 | 1.714 | 1.816 | 0.856 | 0.754 | 0.843 | |
WY73 | 1.877 | 1.017 | 1.850 | 1.769 | 1.688 | 0.600 | 0.581 | 0.786 | |
B324 | 1.826 | 1.263 | 3.549 | 2.875 | 1.401 | 0.655 | 0.863 | 0.604 | |
B040 | 3.198 | 1.022 | 1.711 | 1.968 | 2.224 | 0.728 | 0.738 | 0.744 | |
B018 | 5.395 | 1.434 | 1.865 | 2.338 | 4.810 | 0.935 | 0.497 | 0.852 | |
A204 | 2.330 | 1.931 | 2.275 | 1.748 | 2.420 | 0.796 | 0.906 | 0.703 | |
B135 | 3.632 | 1.479 | 1.702 | 1.799 | 1.878 | 0.830 | 0.853 | 0.840 | |
WY266 | 2.878 | 1.466 | 1.090 | 1.986 | 2.408 | 0.607 | 0.912 | 0.852 | |
第2组 Group 2 | A124 | 5.703 | 1.091 | 1.972 | 3.093 | 2.214 | 0.925 | 0.856 | 0.847 |
A158 | 2.155 | 1.489 | 0.810 | 0.780 | 1.935 | 0.750 | 0.917 | 0.758 | |
A198 | 3.310 | 1.352 | 1.253 | 2.531 | 1.981 | 0.837 | 0.887 | 0.970 | |
WY248 | 1.631 | 1.974 | 1.206 | 0.913 | 1.121 | 0.642 | 0.871 | 0.715 | |
B166 | 1.984 | 1.813 | 0.888 | 0.843 | 1.918 | 0.702 | 0.909 | 0.910 | |
C004 | 2.333 | 1.285 | 2.377 | 2.406 | 2.435 | 0.677 | 0.810 | 0.723 | |
C168 | 1.840 | 1.343 | 1.245 | 2.117 | 1.610 | 0.548 | 0.873 | 0.628 | |
A196 | 2.102 | 1.615 | 1.865 | 1.795 | 2.527 | 0.636 | 0.999 | 0.953 | |
WY284 | 1.690 | 1.278 | 1.424 | 1.599 | 2.374 | 0.655 | 0.836 | 0.855 | |
C189 | 1.565 | 1.666 | 1.599 | 1.493 | 2.021 | 0.550 | 0.731 | 0.876 | |
均值Mean | 2.554 | 1.494 | 1.657 | 1.921 | 2.353 | 0.722 | 0.842 | 0.799 | |
标准差SD | 1.060 | 0.350 | 0.623 | 0.705 | 0.807 | 0.128 | 0.108 | 0.106 | |
变异系数CV/% | 41.50 | 23.43 | 37.60 | 36.70 | 34.30 | 17.73 | 12.83 | 13.27 |
Table 2 Heat-tolerance coefficient of every single character of 30 pepper materials
组别 Group | 材料编号 Material No. | 可溶性糖 SS | 可溶性蛋白 SP | 过氧化物酶 POD | 过氧化氢酶 CAT | 脯氨酸 Pro | 丙二醛MDA | 相对电导率 REC | 株高 PH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1组 Group 1 | WY86 | 3.141 | 1.458 | 0.932 | 2.210 | 3.408 | 0.945 | 0.909 | 0.763 |
C031 | 1.495 | 1.662 | 1.040 | 0.873 | 1.687 | 0.528 | 0.752 | 0.917 | |
WY14 | 3.074 | 1.074 | 2.249 | 2.282 | 3.315 | 0.931 | 0.881 | 0.613 | |
B048 | 2.251 | 1.551 | 1.394 | 2.751 | 2.309 | 0.706 | 0.897 | 0.982 | |
C134 | 2.094 | 1.827 | 1.988 | 1.758 | 3.164 | 0.770 | 0.980 | 0.772 | |
B410 | 2.581 | 1.879 | 1.105 | 2.232 | 2.030 | 0.535 | 0.825 | 0.907 | |
C099 | 1.867 | 1.299 | 2.554 | 2.048 | 3.196 | 0.642 | 0.868 | 0.646 | |
A264 | 2.988 | 1.746 | 2.106 | 2.396 | 2.686 | 0.811 | 0.937 | 0.807 | |
WY69 | 1.180 | 1.246 | 0.856 | 0.069 | 1.383 | 0.624 | 0.747 | 0.813 | |
A162 | 1.938 | 1.184 | 1.222 | 2.011 | 1.643 | 0.735 | 0.895 | 0.891 | |
WY231 | 1.702 | 1.690 | 2.077 | 2.053 | 3.716 | 0.629 | 0.818 | 0.685 | |
C002 | 3.775 | 2.608 | 2.280 | 3.179 | 3.278 | 0.871 | 0.961 | 0.728 | |
A134 | 3.071 | 1.075 | 1.211 | 1.714 | 1.816 | 0.856 | 0.754 | 0.843 | |
WY73 | 1.877 | 1.017 | 1.850 | 1.769 | 1.688 | 0.600 | 0.581 | 0.786 | |
B324 | 1.826 | 1.263 | 3.549 | 2.875 | 1.401 | 0.655 | 0.863 | 0.604 | |
B040 | 3.198 | 1.022 | 1.711 | 1.968 | 2.224 | 0.728 | 0.738 | 0.744 | |
B018 | 5.395 | 1.434 | 1.865 | 2.338 | 4.810 | 0.935 | 0.497 | 0.852 | |
A204 | 2.330 | 1.931 | 2.275 | 1.748 | 2.420 | 0.796 | 0.906 | 0.703 | |
B135 | 3.632 | 1.479 | 1.702 | 1.799 | 1.878 | 0.830 | 0.853 | 0.840 | |
WY266 | 2.878 | 1.466 | 1.090 | 1.986 | 2.408 | 0.607 | 0.912 | 0.852 | |
第2组 Group 2 | A124 | 5.703 | 1.091 | 1.972 | 3.093 | 2.214 | 0.925 | 0.856 | 0.847 |
A158 | 2.155 | 1.489 | 0.810 | 0.780 | 1.935 | 0.750 | 0.917 | 0.758 | |
A198 | 3.310 | 1.352 | 1.253 | 2.531 | 1.981 | 0.837 | 0.887 | 0.970 | |
WY248 | 1.631 | 1.974 | 1.206 | 0.913 | 1.121 | 0.642 | 0.871 | 0.715 | |
B166 | 1.984 | 1.813 | 0.888 | 0.843 | 1.918 | 0.702 | 0.909 | 0.910 | |
C004 | 2.333 | 1.285 | 2.377 | 2.406 | 2.435 | 0.677 | 0.810 | 0.723 | |
C168 | 1.840 | 1.343 | 1.245 | 2.117 | 1.610 | 0.548 | 0.873 | 0.628 | |
A196 | 2.102 | 1.615 | 1.865 | 1.795 | 2.527 | 0.636 | 0.999 | 0.953 | |
WY284 | 1.690 | 1.278 | 1.424 | 1.599 | 2.374 | 0.655 | 0.836 | 0.855 | |
C189 | 1.565 | 1.666 | 1.599 | 1.493 | 2.021 | 0.550 | 0.731 | 0.876 | |
均值Mean | 2.554 | 1.494 | 1.657 | 1.921 | 2.353 | 0.722 | 0.842 | 0.799 | |
标准差SD | 1.060 | 0.350 | 0.623 | 0.705 | 0.807 | 0.128 | 0.108 | 0.106 | |
变异系数CV/% | 41.50 | 23.43 | 37.60 | 36.70 | 34.30 | 17.73 | 12.83 | 13.27 |
指标 Index | 可溶性糖 SS | 可溶性蛋白SP | 过氧化物酶POD | 过氧化氢酶CAT | 脯氨酸 Pro | 丙二醛 MDA | 相对电导率 REC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
可溶性蛋白SP | -0.076 | ||||||
过氧化物酶POD | 0.135 | -0.006 | |||||
过氧化氢酶CAT | 0.574** | 0.002 | 0.576** | ||||
脯氨酸Pro | 0.467** | 0.172 | 0.300 | 0.400* | |||
丙二醛MDA | 0.759** | -0.059 | 0.148 | 0.408* | 0.488** | ||
相对电导率REC | -0.162 | 0.401 | 0.035 | 0.144 | -0.094 | -0.092 | |
株高PH | 0.119 | 0.061 | -0.552** | -0.127 | -0.152 | -0.059 | -0.053 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of 8 heat tolerance identification indexes
指标 Index | 可溶性糖 SS | 可溶性蛋白SP | 过氧化物酶POD | 过氧化氢酶CAT | 脯氨酸 Pro | 丙二醛 MDA | 相对电导率 REC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
可溶性蛋白SP | -0.076 | ||||||
过氧化物酶POD | 0.135 | -0.006 | |||||
过氧化氢酶CAT | 0.574** | 0.002 | 0.576** | ||||
脯氨酸Pro | 0.467** | 0.172 | 0.300 | 0.400* | |||
丙二醛MDA | 0.759** | -0.059 | 0.148 | 0.408* | 0.488** | ||
相对电导率REC | -0.162 | 0.401 | 0.035 | 0.144 | -0.094 | -0.092 | |
株高PH | 0.119 | 0.061 | -0.552** | -0.127 | -0.152 | -0.059 | -0.053 |
组别 Group | 综合 指标 CI | 标准化特征向量Standardization eigenvector | 贡献率 Contribution ratio/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
可溶性糖 SS | 可溶性蛋白 SP | 过氧化物酶 POD | 过氧化氢酶 CAT | 脯氨酸 Pro | 丙二醛 MDA | 相对电导率 REC | 株高 PH | |||
第1组 Group 1 | 1 | 0.395 | 0.226 | 0.340 | 0.451 | 0.438 | 0.426 | 0.140 | -0.284 | 36.375 |
2 | 0.495 | -0.101 | -0.472 | -0.103 | 0.227 | 0.287 | -0.410 | 0.457 | 22.502 | |
3 | -0.030 | 0.648 | -0.306 | 0.133 | -0.032 | -0.070 | 0.530 | 0.425 | 17.597 | |
第2组 Group 2 | 1 | 0.482 | -0.456 | 0.377 | 0.509 | 0.073 | 0.365 | -0.091 | 0.106 | 41.003 |
2 | 0.179 | 0.153 | -0.105 | -0.176 | -0.574 | 0.470 | 0.522 | 0.283 | 25.496 | |
3 | 0.122 | 0.211 | -0.317 | 0.030 | 0.441 | 0.035 | -0.134 | 0.791 | 13.695 |
Table 4 Standardization eigenvector and contribution ratio of varieties’ first three comprehensive index
组别 Group | 综合 指标 CI | 标准化特征向量Standardization eigenvector | 贡献率 Contribution ratio/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
可溶性糖 SS | 可溶性蛋白 SP | 过氧化物酶 POD | 过氧化氢酶 CAT | 脯氨酸 Pro | 丙二醛 MDA | 相对电导率 REC | 株高 PH | |||
第1组 Group 1 | 1 | 0.395 | 0.226 | 0.340 | 0.451 | 0.438 | 0.426 | 0.140 | -0.284 | 36.375 |
2 | 0.495 | -0.101 | -0.472 | -0.103 | 0.227 | 0.287 | -0.410 | 0.457 | 22.502 | |
3 | -0.030 | 0.648 | -0.306 | 0.133 | -0.032 | -0.070 | 0.530 | 0.425 | 17.597 | |
第2组 Group 2 | 1 | 0.482 | -0.456 | 0.377 | 0.509 | 0.073 | 0.365 | -0.091 | 0.106 | 41.003 |
2 | 0.179 | 0.153 | -0.105 | -0.176 | -0.574 | 0.470 | 0.522 | 0.283 | 25.496 | |
3 | 0.122 | 0.211 | -0.317 | 0.030 | 0.441 | 0.035 | -0.134 | 0.791 | 13.695 |
组别 Group | 材料编号 Material No. | 综合指标1得分SCI1 | 综合指标1隶属函数值 μ(1) | 综合指标2得分 SCI2 | 综合指标1隶属函数值 μ(2) | 综合指标3得分SCI3 | 综合指标1隶属函数值 μ(3) | D值 D value | 耐热性评价Heat tolerance evaluation | 排序/预测值 Rank/forecast value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1组 Group 1 | WY86 | 4.690 | 0.617 | 1.761 | 1.000 | 1.488 | 0.635 | 0.734 | MR | 3 |
C031 | 2.522 | 0.152 | 0.636 | 0.555 | 1.526 | 0.665 | 0.389 | MS | 17 | |
WY14 | 5.049 | 0.694 | 1.054 | 0.721 | 0.773 | 0.073 | 0.559 | MS | 9 | |
B048 | 4.114 | 0.493 | 0.824 | 0.629 | 1.644 | 0.758 | 0.594 | MR | 8 | |
C134 | 4.341 | 0.542 | 0.623 | 0.550 | 1.437 | 0.595 | 0.557 | MS | 10 | |
B410 | 3.802 | 0.426 | 1.026 | 0.710 | 1.817 | 0.894 | 0.617 | MR | 5 | |
C099 | 4.435 | 0.562 | 0.225 | 0.393 | 0.862 | 0.142 | 0.416 | MS | 16 | |
A264 | 4.796 | 0.640 | 0.888 | 0.655 | 1.411 | 0.574 | 0.629 | MR | 4 | |
WY69 | 1.816 | 0.000 | 0.605 | 0.543 | 1.172 | 0.386 | 0.249 | S | 20 | |
A162 | 3.261 | 0.310 | 0.679 | 0.572 | 1.350 | 0.527 | 0.437 | MS | 15 | |
WY231 | 4.502 | 0.577 | 0.482 | 0.494 | 1.242 | 0.441 | 0.521 | MS | 11 | |
C002 | 6.025 | 0.903 | 1.133 | 0.752 | 1.952 | 1.000 | 0.881 | R | 2 | |
A134 | 3.667 | 0.397 | 1.397 | 0.856 | 1.101 | 0.330 | 0.517 | MS | 12 | |
WY73 | 3.251 | 0.308 | 0.446 | 0.480 | 0.816 | 0.106 | 0.312 | S | 18 | |
B324 | 4.353 | 0.545 | -0.768 | 0.000 | 0.681 | 0.000 | 0.259 | S | 19 | |
B040 | 4.140 | 0.499 | 1.220 | 0.786 | 0.888 | 0.163 | 0.506 | MS | 14 | |
B018 | 6.475 | 1.000 | 2.950 | 1.470 | 0.911 | 0.182 | 0.950 | R | 1 | |
A204 | 4.245 | 0.521 | 0.431 | 0.474 | 1.362 | 0.536 | 0.511 | MS | 13 | |
B135 | 4.216 | 0.515 | 1.358 | 0.841 | 1.257 | 0.453 | 0.597 | MR | 7 | |
WY266 | 3.934 | 0.455 | 1.293 | 0.815 | 1.519 | 0.660 | 0.608 | MR | 6 | |
权重Weight coefficient | 0.476 | 0.294 | 0.230 | |||||||
第2组 Group 2 | A124 | 5.085 | 1.000 | 0.288 | 0.823 | 1.959 | 0.475 | 0.854 | R | 0.817 |
A158 | 1.477 | 0.090 | 0.326 | 0.843 | 1.701 | 0.307 | 0.366 | MS | 0.463 | |
A198 | 3.216 | 0.529 | 0.217 | 0.785 | 1.920 | 0.449 | 0.597 | MR | 0.636 | |
WY248 | 1.121 | 0.000 | 0.622 | 1.000 | 1.227 | 0.000 | 0.318 | S | 0.402 | |
B166 | 1.215 | 0.024 | 0.382 | 0.873 | 1.880 | 0.423 | 0.362 | MS | 0.488 | |
C004 | 3.090 | 0.497 | -0.510 | 0.400 | 1.436 | 0.136 | 0.404 | MS | 0.453 | |
C168 | 2.230 | 0.280 | -0.793 | 0.250 | 1.895 | 0.433 | 0.297 | S | 0.443 | |
A196 | 2.324 | 0.304 | -0.249 | 0.538 | 1.817 | 0.383 | 0.392 | MS | 0.487 | |
WY284 | 2.013 | 0.225 | -0.309 | 0.506 | 1.707 | 0.311 | 0.329 | S | 0.417 | |
C189 | 2.241 | 0.283 | -1.264 | 0.000 | 2.769 | 1.000 | 0.315 | S | 0.414 | |
权重Weight coefficient | 0.511 | 0.318 | 0.171 |
Table 5 Score of comprehensive index, subordinative function value, weight coefficient, D value and evaluation of heat tolerance of every varieties
组别 Group | 材料编号 Material No. | 综合指标1得分SCI1 | 综合指标1隶属函数值 μ(1) | 综合指标2得分 SCI2 | 综合指标1隶属函数值 μ(2) | 综合指标3得分SCI3 | 综合指标1隶属函数值 μ(3) | D值 D value | 耐热性评价Heat tolerance evaluation | 排序/预测值 Rank/forecast value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1组 Group 1 | WY86 | 4.690 | 0.617 | 1.761 | 1.000 | 1.488 | 0.635 | 0.734 | MR | 3 |
C031 | 2.522 | 0.152 | 0.636 | 0.555 | 1.526 | 0.665 | 0.389 | MS | 17 | |
WY14 | 5.049 | 0.694 | 1.054 | 0.721 | 0.773 | 0.073 | 0.559 | MS | 9 | |
B048 | 4.114 | 0.493 | 0.824 | 0.629 | 1.644 | 0.758 | 0.594 | MR | 8 | |
C134 | 4.341 | 0.542 | 0.623 | 0.550 | 1.437 | 0.595 | 0.557 | MS | 10 | |
B410 | 3.802 | 0.426 | 1.026 | 0.710 | 1.817 | 0.894 | 0.617 | MR | 5 | |
C099 | 4.435 | 0.562 | 0.225 | 0.393 | 0.862 | 0.142 | 0.416 | MS | 16 | |
A264 | 4.796 | 0.640 | 0.888 | 0.655 | 1.411 | 0.574 | 0.629 | MR | 4 | |
WY69 | 1.816 | 0.000 | 0.605 | 0.543 | 1.172 | 0.386 | 0.249 | S | 20 | |
A162 | 3.261 | 0.310 | 0.679 | 0.572 | 1.350 | 0.527 | 0.437 | MS | 15 | |
WY231 | 4.502 | 0.577 | 0.482 | 0.494 | 1.242 | 0.441 | 0.521 | MS | 11 | |
C002 | 6.025 | 0.903 | 1.133 | 0.752 | 1.952 | 1.000 | 0.881 | R | 2 | |
A134 | 3.667 | 0.397 | 1.397 | 0.856 | 1.101 | 0.330 | 0.517 | MS | 12 | |
WY73 | 3.251 | 0.308 | 0.446 | 0.480 | 0.816 | 0.106 | 0.312 | S | 18 | |
B324 | 4.353 | 0.545 | -0.768 | 0.000 | 0.681 | 0.000 | 0.259 | S | 19 | |
B040 | 4.140 | 0.499 | 1.220 | 0.786 | 0.888 | 0.163 | 0.506 | MS | 14 | |
B018 | 6.475 | 1.000 | 2.950 | 1.470 | 0.911 | 0.182 | 0.950 | R | 1 | |
A204 | 4.245 | 0.521 | 0.431 | 0.474 | 1.362 | 0.536 | 0.511 | MS | 13 | |
B135 | 4.216 | 0.515 | 1.358 | 0.841 | 1.257 | 0.453 | 0.597 | MR | 7 | |
WY266 | 3.934 | 0.455 | 1.293 | 0.815 | 1.519 | 0.660 | 0.608 | MR | 6 | |
权重Weight coefficient | 0.476 | 0.294 | 0.230 | |||||||
第2组 Group 2 | A124 | 5.085 | 1.000 | 0.288 | 0.823 | 1.959 | 0.475 | 0.854 | R | 0.817 |
A158 | 1.477 | 0.090 | 0.326 | 0.843 | 1.701 | 0.307 | 0.366 | MS | 0.463 | |
A198 | 3.216 | 0.529 | 0.217 | 0.785 | 1.920 | 0.449 | 0.597 | MR | 0.636 | |
WY248 | 1.121 | 0.000 | 0.622 | 1.000 | 1.227 | 0.000 | 0.318 | S | 0.402 | |
B166 | 1.215 | 0.024 | 0.382 | 0.873 | 1.880 | 0.423 | 0.362 | MS | 0.488 | |
C004 | 3.090 | 0.497 | -0.510 | 0.400 | 1.436 | 0.136 | 0.404 | MS | 0.453 | |
C168 | 2.230 | 0.280 | -0.793 | 0.250 | 1.895 | 0.433 | 0.297 | S | 0.443 | |
A196 | 2.324 | 0.304 | -0.249 | 0.538 | 1.817 | 0.383 | 0.392 | MS | 0.487 | |
WY284 | 2.013 | 0.225 | -0.309 | 0.506 | 1.707 | 0.311 | 0.329 | S | 0.417 | |
C189 | 2.241 | 0.283 | -1.264 | 0.000 | 2.769 | 1.000 | 0.315 | S | 0.414 | |
权重Weight coefficient | 0.511 | 0.318 | 0.171 |
材料编号 Material No. | 热害指数 HII | 耐热性评价EHT | 综合评价D value | 材料编号 Material No. | 热害指数HII | 耐热性评价EHT | 综合评价D value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C002 | 0.116 | R | R | WY73 | 0.332 | MR | S |
B018 | 0.127 | R | R | A204 | 0.363 | MR | MS |
WY86 | 0.258 | MR | MR | B048 | 0.377 | MR | MR |
B135 | 0.269 | MR | MR | C134 | 0.387 | MR | MS |
B410 | 0.273 | MR | MR | A134 | 0.627 | MS | MS |
WY14 | 0.284 | MR | MS | B040 | 0.633 | MS | MS |
C099 | 0.289 | MR | MS | B324 | 0.683 | MS | S |
A264 | 0.293 | MR | MR | A162 | 0.717 | MS | MS |
WY231 | 0.295 | MR | MS | C031 | 0.798 | S | MS |
WY266 | 0.309 | MR | MR | WY69 | 0.938 | S | S |
Table 6 Comparison of heat tolerance evaluation of pepper based on HII and D values
材料编号 Material No. | 热害指数 HII | 耐热性评价EHT | 综合评价D value | 材料编号 Material No. | 热害指数HII | 耐热性评价EHT | 综合评价D value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C002 | 0.116 | R | R | WY73 | 0.332 | MR | S |
B018 | 0.127 | R | R | A204 | 0.363 | MR | MS |
WY86 | 0.258 | MR | MR | B048 | 0.377 | MR | MR |
B135 | 0.269 | MR | MR | C134 | 0.387 | MR | MS |
B410 | 0.273 | MR | MR | A134 | 0.627 | MS | MS |
WY14 | 0.284 | MR | MS | B040 | 0.633 | MS | MS |
C099 | 0.289 | MR | MS | B324 | 0.683 | MS | S |
A264 | 0.293 | MR | MR | A162 | 0.717 | MS | MS |
WY231 | 0.295 | MR | MS | C031 | 0.798 | S | MS |
WY266 | 0.309 | MR | MR | WY69 | 0.938 | S | S |
1 | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [M]. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2013:1535. |
2 | ASLAM A Q, AHMAD S R, AHMAD I, et al.. Vulnerability and impact assessment of extreme climatic event: a case study of southern Punjab, Pakistan [J]. Sci. Total Environ., 2017, 580: 468-481. |
3 | WANG J, LIANG C, YANG S, et al.. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis of heat stress-induced mechanisms in pepper seedlings [J/OL]. Peer J., 2021, 9: e11509 [2023-04-21]. . |
4 | DING Y H, REN G Y, SHI G Y, et al.. China’s national assessment report on climate change (I): climate change in China and the future trend [J]. Adv. Climate Change Res., 2007, 3(S1): 1-5. |
5 | 王鑫, 徐乃林, 赵尊练, 等. 花期高温胁迫对线辣椒形态指标及生理特性的影响[J]. 辣椒杂志, 2016, 14(2): 18-21, 37. |
WANG X, XU N L, ZHAO Z L, et al.. Effects of high temperature stress during flowering on morphological and physiological characters in linear hot pepper [J]. J. China Capsicum, 2016, 14(2): 18-21, 37. | |
6 | GUO M, ZHAI Y F, LU J P, et al.. Characterization of CaHsp70-1, a pepper heat-shock protein gene in response to heat stress and some regulation exogenous substances in Capsicum annuum L. [J]. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2014, 15(11): 19741-19759. |
7 | 苏小俊, 袁希汉, 徐海. 大白菜耐热性和过氧化物酶活性与热害指数的相关性[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2007, 23(5): 456-458. |
SU X J, YUAN X H, XU H. Correlation between heat tolerance and POD activity and heat injury index of Chinese cabbage [J]. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci., 2007, 23(5): 456-458. | |
8 | 李光光, 张财顺, 郑岩松. 不同菜心品种耐热性鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(18): 1-5. |
LI G G, ZHANG C S, ZHENG Y S. Screening of assessment indexes on heat tolerance in different Chinese flowering cabbage cultivars [J]. North. Hortic., 2012(18): 1-5. | |
9 | 赵思涵, 田丽波, 商桑, 等. 黑叶不结球白菜耐热性的抗氧化指标评估体系的构建[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(11): 1852-1860. |
ZHAO S H, TIAN L B, SHANG S, et al.. Construction of evaluation system for antioxidant index of heat resistance in black leaf non-heading Chinese cabbage [J]. Acta Agric. Bor- Occid. Sin., 2019, 28(11): 1852-1860. | |
10 | 田守波, 陈春宏, 张兆辉. 瓠瓜对高温胁迫的生理生化响应及耐热性评价[J]. 上海农业学报, 2020, 36(6): 18-23. |
TIAN S B, CHEN C H, ZHANG Z H. Physiological and biochemical response to heat stress and heat resistances evaluation of bottle gourds [J]. Acta Agric. Shanghai, 2020, 36(6): 18-23. | |
11 | JAGADISH S V K, WAY D A, SHARKEY T D. Plant heat stress: concepts directing future research [J]. Plant Cell Environ., 2021, 44(7): 1992-2005. |
12 | 徐小万, 曹必好, 陈国菊, 等. 高温高湿对辣椒抗氧化系统的影响及不同品种抗氧化性差异研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2008, 23(1): 81-86. |
XU X W, CAO B H, CHEN G J, et al.. Effects of high temperature and air humidity stress on antioxidant system and antioxidant activity differences of hot pepper varieties [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2008, 23(1): 81-86. | |
13 | 姚元干, 石雪晖, 杨建国, 等. 辣椒叶片耐热性生理生化指标探讨[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 24(2): 119-122. |
YAO Y G, SHI X H, YANG J G, et al.. Study on physiological and biochemical indice of heat tolerance of pepper leaves [J]. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 1998, 24(2): 119-122. | |
14 | 潘宝贵, 王述彬, 刘金兵, 等. 高温胁迫对不同辣椒品种苗期光合作用的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2006, 22(2): 137-140. |
PAN B G, WANG S B, LIU J B, et al.. Effect of heat stress on photosynthesis of pepper cultivars at seedling stage [J]. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci., 2006, 22(2): 137-140. | |
15 | 朱德宁, 刘素娜, 赵绮薇, 等. 有棱丝瓜耐热性种质资源筛选与耐热生理响应[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(9): 132-137. |
ZHU D N, LIU S N, ZHAO Q W, et al.. Screening of heat-tolerant germplasm resources of Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxb. and its physiological response to heat resistance [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2021, 49(9): 132-137. | |
16 | CHAKRABORTEE S, BOSCHETTI C, WALTON L J, et al.. Hydrophilic protein associated with desiccation tolerance exhibits broad protein stabilization function [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2007, 104(46): 18073-18078. |
17 | 李晓锋, 侯瑞贤, 朱玉英, 等. 高温胁迫对大白菜抗氧化系统酶及可溶性蛋白质和热稳定蛋白质的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2009, 25(4): 26-30. |
LI X F, HOU R X, ZHU Y Y, et al.. Effects of heat stress on antioxidant enzymes, solubk protein and heat-stable protein of Chinese cabbage [J]. Acta Agric. Shanghai, 2009, 25(4): 26-30. | |
18 | 陈文超, 欧立军, 王静, 等. 辣椒植株耐热性鉴定技术规程: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019. |
19 | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 1-49. |
20 | YIN H, CHEN Q M, YI M F. Effects of short-term heat stress on oxidative damage and responses of antioxidant system in Lilium longiflorum [J]. Plant Growth Regul., 2008, 54(1): 45-54. |
21 | 姚元干, 石雪晖, 杨建国, 等. 辣椒耐热性与叶片质膜透性及几种生化物质含量的关系[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 26(2): 97-99. |
YAO Y G, SHI X H, YANG J G, et al.. Relations of the permeability of plasma membrane of leaves and the contents of several biochemical matter to heat-tolerance of pepper [J]. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2000, 26(2): 97-99. | |
22 | 姜燕, 黄新根, 杨寅桂, 等. 辣椒苗期耐热性及其生理生化特性研究[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2014(12): 47-49, 50. |
JIANG Y, HUANG X G, YANG Y G, et al.. Study on heat tolerance and physiological-biochemical characteristics of hot pepper seedlings [J]. J. Changjiang Veget., 2014(12): 47-49, 50. | |
23 | 王静, 梁成亮, 张西露, 等. 辣椒种质资源的耐热性评价与鉴定[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 46(5): 551-557. |
WANG J, LIANG C L, ZHANG X L, et al.. Evaluation and identification of resistance to heat stress in germplasm resources of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) [J]. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2020, 46(5): 551-557. | |
24 | 康俊根, 翟依仁, 张京社, 等. 甘蓝耐热性鉴定方法[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2002(1): 4-7. |
KANG J G, ZHAI Y R, ZHANG J S, et al.. Study on high temperature injury and identification method of heat tolerance in cabbage [J]. China Veget., 2002(1): 4-7. | |
25 | 孙保娟, 李植良, 黎振兴, 等. 茄子耐热性苗期鉴定研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2007, 34(2): 27-29. |
SUN B J, LI Z L, LI Z X, et al.. Studies on assaying system at seedling stage for heat-tolerance of eggplant (Solanum melogena L.) [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2007, 34(2): 27-29. | |
26 | 张冉, 贾利, 方凌, 等. 茄子耐热性苗期指标的筛选及耐热种质鉴定[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2017(12): 36-40. |
ZHANG R, JIA L, FANG L, et al.. Screening of heat-tolerance indexes on eggplant seedling stage and evaluation of heat-tolerance germplasm [J]. J. Changjiang Veget., 2017(12): 36-40. | |
27 | 赵东风, 郭勤卫, 项小敏, 等. 利用隶属函数法对观赏辣椒种质资源耐热性的评价[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(1): 64-66. |
ZHAO D F, GUO Q W, XIANG X M, et al.. Evaluation of heat resistance of ornamental pepper germplasm resources by membership function method [J]. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci., 2019, 60(1): 64-66. | |
28 | 张婷, 郭勤卫, 刘慧琴, 等. 基于隶属函数法的辣椒苗期耐冷性综合评价[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 49-55. |
ZHANG T, GUO Q W, LIU H Q, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of low temperature resistance of pepper at seeding stage by membership function method [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2020, 32(4): 49-55. | |
29 | 宋静爽, 王静, 刘周斌, 等. 辣椒苗期对低温胁迫的响应及耐冷评价体系的建立[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(22): 7537-7546. |
SONG J S, WANG J, LIU Z B, et al.. Response of pepper seedlings to low temperature stress and establishment of cold tolerance evaluation system [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2020, 18(22): 7537-7546. | |
30 | 但忠, 木万福, 龙洪进, 等. 不同欧洲型黄瓜苗期耐热性综合评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(12): 2312-2318. |
DAN Z, MU W F, LONG H J, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation on heat tolerance of different Europe-type cucumber germplasm at seeding stage [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2016, 37(12): 2312-2318. | |
31 | 陈中钐, 杜文丽, 许端祥, 等. 苦瓜苗期耐热性综合评价及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(3): 1-7. |
CHEN Z S, DU W L, XU D X, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of Momordica charantia heat tolerance at seedling stage and screening of identification indexes [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2022, 34(3): 1-7. | |
32 | 丁圆圆, 王曦奥, 刘策, 等. 黄瓜耐湿冷性苗期综合评价预测方程的建立[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(11): 87-96. |
DING Y Y, WANG X A, LIU C, et al.. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation and prediction equation for cucumber wet-cold tolerance at seedling stage [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2022, 24(11): 87-96. |
[1] | Qianya WEI, Xinqi LIN, Lamei LIANG, Zhongwei QIN, Yingzhi LI. Effects of Melatonin on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Chaotian Pepper Under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 46-57. |
[2] | Ziwen KONG, Ruxia TIAN, Ruyi MIAO, Yanping LIANG. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Genetic Diversity of 60 Screw Pepper Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 40-47. |
[3] | Dejun ZHANG, Xiaoming ZHANG, Di WU, Shuyun LIN, Taihua ZHANG, Weiping XU. Simulation of Pepper Cleaning Based on DEM-CFD Coupling [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 87-96. |
[4] | Guanqun CHAI, Li WANG, Guihua LIU, Xinjian LUOMU, Ya JIANG, Hong LIANG, Chengwu FAN. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals and Differences in Cd Uptake and Accumulation of Three Types of Pod Peppers [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 169-177. |
[5] | Yuanyuan DING, Xi’ao WANG, Ce LIU, Shuju LI, Zhihui CHENG. Establishment of Comprehensive Evaluation and Prediction Equation for Cucumber Wet-cold Tolerance at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(11): 87-96. |
[6] | Hairong XU, Lin WANG, Congmin WU, Yuanchun YU, Cheng DAI. Effects of Biogas Slurry Application on Green Pepper Growth and Soil Properties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(10): 179-188. |
[7] | CHENG Yunxia§, WU Hui§, LIU Qianjie, SHI Zhenyu, JIA Kai, CHEN Yilin, YU Anwei, SHEN Jinxiu. Influences of Water-retaining Agent with Different Doses on Growth and Quality of Bag-type Compound Sape Pepper [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 55-62. |
[8] | LIU Na1, WANG Yan1, ZHAO Chenyang2, GUO Junxian2. Feasibility Study on Mechanized Transplanting of Pepper in Sunlight Greenhouse [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(2): 96-104. |
[9] | WANG Wei, LI Yong, WANG Wei, BIAN Xue, LI Xiying*. Anti-disease Effect and Mechanism of Y-S-Y12 Strain Fermentation Mixed with Biomass Pyrolysis Solution on Pepper Anthracnose [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(10): 129-138. |
[10] | LI Zonggeng, FU Guohai, LIU Wenke*. Diurnal Temperature Changes of Root Zone and Lateral Side of Four Soil-Ridged Substrate-Embedded Cultivation Ridges Planted Sweet Pepper in Chinese Solar Greenhouse [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 108-115. |
[11] | YU Hong-xiang1, YANG Rui1, WANG Shu-peng1, LV Jian1, YU Ji-Hua1*, XIE Jian-ming1. Effects of Organic Substrates on Pepper Physiological Characteristics and Yield in Solar Greenhouse [J]. , 2015, 17(3): 107-115. |
[12] | XU Xiao-wan1,2, LEI Jian-jun2, LI Ying1, WANG Heng-ming1, XU Xiao-mei1, LUO . Comprehensive Evaluation of High Temperature and Humidity Tolerance of Hot Pepper at Germination Stage Based on Mathematical Model [J]. , 2013, 15(6): 174-180. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||