Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 70-79.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0365
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Baozhen ZENG(), Yongjuan CHENG, Juanbo YANG, Lili CHE, Jing LIANG, Shixiong LU, Guoping LIANG, Zonghuan MA, Juan MAO(
)
Received:
2023-05-15
Accepted:
2023-06-25
Online:
2025-02-15
Published:
2025-02-14
Contact:
Juan MAO
曾宝珍(), 成永娟, 杨娟博, 车莉莉, 梁靖, 卢世雄, 梁国平, 马宗桓, 毛娟(
)
通讯作者:
毛娟
作者简介:
曾宝珍 E-mail:2361731369@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Baozhen ZENG, Yongjuan CHENG, Juanbo YANG, Lili CHE, Jing LIANG, Shixiong LU, Guoping LIANG, Zonghuan MA, Juan MAO. Determination of the Best Harvesting Period for ‘Muhe White’ Grape in Minqin District, Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 70-79.
曾宝珍, 成永娟, 杨娟博, 车莉莉, 梁靖, 卢世雄, 梁国平, 马宗桓, 毛娟. 甘肃民勤地区‘慕合怀特’葡萄最佳采收期的确定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 70-79.
品种 Variety | 采样时间 Sampling time (m/d) | 百粒重 100-grains weight/g | 纵径 Longitudinal diameter/mm | 横径 Transverse diameter/mm | 果形指数 Fruit shape index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
慕合怀特369 Muhe White 369 | 9/9 | 138.02±4.38 bc | 12.28±0.19 c | 11.45±0.31 c | 1.07±0.01 a |
9/13 | 122.8±9.42 c | 13.36±0.28 b | 12.51±0.19 b | 1.06±0.01 a | |
9/17 | 137.47±7.29 bc | 14.26±0.32 a | 13.80±0.19 a | 1.06±0.02 a | |
9/21 | 148.93±7.21 ab | 14.57±0.47 a | 13.83±0.26 a | 1.03±0.01 a | |
9/25 | 152.73±4.78 a | 14.82±0.15 a | 14.30±0.31 a | 1.04±0.03 a | |
9/29 | 141.87±8.41 ab | 14.61±0.03 a | 14.02±0.01 a | 1.04±0.02 a | |
慕合怀特234 Muhe White 234 | 9/9 | 120.90±7.02 d | 12.55±0.27 c | 11.64±0.21 c | 1.07±0.01 ab |
9/13 | 143.83±5.71 a | 13.50±0.20 b | 13.49±0.39 b | 0.99±0.04 b | |
9/17 | 115.07±7.28 cd | 15.21±0.34 ab | 14.36±0.21 a | 1.05±0.01 ab | |
9/21 | 127.93±2.31 cd | 15.42±0.32 b | 14.52±0.03 a | 1.06±0.02 ab | |
9/25 | 139.00±5.37 ab | 15.71±0.03 ab | 14.90±0.10 ab | 1.19±0.11 a | |
9/29 | 130.23±3.21 bc | 14.57±0.27 ab | 13.95±0.31 ab | 1.04±0.02 ab |
Table 1 Appearance quality of ‘Muhe White’ grape in different sampling times
品种 Variety | 采样时间 Sampling time (m/d) | 百粒重 100-grains weight/g | 纵径 Longitudinal diameter/mm | 横径 Transverse diameter/mm | 果形指数 Fruit shape index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
慕合怀特369 Muhe White 369 | 9/9 | 138.02±4.38 bc | 12.28±0.19 c | 11.45±0.31 c | 1.07±0.01 a |
9/13 | 122.8±9.42 c | 13.36±0.28 b | 12.51±0.19 b | 1.06±0.01 a | |
9/17 | 137.47±7.29 bc | 14.26±0.32 a | 13.80±0.19 a | 1.06±0.02 a | |
9/21 | 148.93±7.21 ab | 14.57±0.47 a | 13.83±0.26 a | 1.03±0.01 a | |
9/25 | 152.73±4.78 a | 14.82±0.15 a | 14.30±0.31 a | 1.04±0.03 a | |
9/29 | 141.87±8.41 ab | 14.61±0.03 a | 14.02±0.01 a | 1.04±0.02 a | |
慕合怀特234 Muhe White 234 | 9/9 | 120.90±7.02 d | 12.55±0.27 c | 11.64±0.21 c | 1.07±0.01 ab |
9/13 | 143.83±5.71 a | 13.50±0.20 b | 13.49±0.39 b | 0.99±0.04 b | |
9/17 | 115.07±7.28 cd | 15.21±0.34 ab | 14.36±0.21 a | 1.05±0.01 ab | |
9/21 | 127.93±2.31 cd | 15.42±0.32 b | 14.52±0.03 a | 1.06±0.02 ab | |
9/25 | 139.00±5.37 ab | 15.71±0.03 ab | 14.90±0.10 ab | 1.19±0.11 a | |
9/29 | 130.23±3.21 bc | 14.57±0.27 ab | 13.95±0.31 ab | 1.04±0.02 ab |
品种 Variety | 采样时间 Sampling time(m/d) | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids/ °Brix | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar/(mg·L-1) | 可滴定酸 Titrable acid/(mg·L-1) | 糖酸比 Sugar/acid | 固酸比 Soluble solids/acid | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
慕合怀特369 Muhe White 369 | 9/9 | 17.03±0.74 f | 145.01±4.37 e | 7.76±0.11 a | 16.75±0.63 e | 2.20±0.15 d | 3.26±0.05 c |
9/13 | 19.20±1.10 e | 160.73±3.84 d | 7.22±0.29 ab | 22.28±0.94 d | 2.67±0.29 d | 3.38±0.05 b | |
9/17 | 20.63±0.45 d | 190.26±6.97 c | 6.52±0.28 bc | 29.17±0.97 c | 3.16±0.12 c | 3.51±0.05 ab | |
9/21 | 23.80±0.54 c | 229.76±2.36 b | 6.18±0.36 c | 37.25±2.41 ab | 3.86±0.31 ab | 3.61±0.05 a | |
9/25 | 26.40±0.45 a | 253.33±3.45 a | 6.43±0.19 c | 39.40±0.98 a | 4.10±0.10 a | 3.55±0.04 ab | |
9/29 | 24.17±0.25 b | 229.67±4.43 b | 6.78±0.42 bc | 33.94±2.29 b | 3.57±0.23 bc | 3.59±0.05 ab | |
慕合怀特234 Muhe White 234 | 9/9 | 16.57±0.33 e | 152.18±7.37 e | 8.74±0.21 a | 17.43±1.27 d | 1.90±0.08 c | 3.23±0.02 d |
9/13 | 18.90±0.16 d | 168.87±3.25 d | 7.46±1.07 ab | 22.97±3.41 cd | 2.57±0.36 bc | 3.29±0.07 cd | |
9/17 | 22.10±0.71 c | 200.09±7.40 c | 7.07±0.69 b | 28.55±3.75 bc | 3.15±0.41 ab | 3.36±0.02 bc | |
9/21 | 24.53±0.33 b | 230.57±3.63 b | 6.94±0.61 b | 33.36±2.48 ab | 3.55±0.26 a | 3.39±0.03 abc | |
9/25 | 26.20±0.50 a | 248.93±2.56 a | 6.71±0.44 b | 37.23±2.74 a | 3.92±0.35 a | 3.51±0.03 a | |
9/29 | 25.70±0.43 ab | 222.08±4.26 b | 6.48±0.71 b | 34.27±2.53 ab | 3.74±0.25 a | 3.43±0.05 ab |
Table 2 Basic physical and chemical indexes of ‘Mu he White’ Grape fruit in different sampling times
品种 Variety | 采样时间 Sampling time(m/d) | 可溶性固形物 Soluble solids/ °Brix | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar/(mg·L-1) | 可滴定酸 Titrable acid/(mg·L-1) | 糖酸比 Sugar/acid | 固酸比 Soluble solids/acid | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
慕合怀特369 Muhe White 369 | 9/9 | 17.03±0.74 f | 145.01±4.37 e | 7.76±0.11 a | 16.75±0.63 e | 2.20±0.15 d | 3.26±0.05 c |
9/13 | 19.20±1.10 e | 160.73±3.84 d | 7.22±0.29 ab | 22.28±0.94 d | 2.67±0.29 d | 3.38±0.05 b | |
9/17 | 20.63±0.45 d | 190.26±6.97 c | 6.52±0.28 bc | 29.17±0.97 c | 3.16±0.12 c | 3.51±0.05 ab | |
9/21 | 23.80±0.54 c | 229.76±2.36 b | 6.18±0.36 c | 37.25±2.41 ab | 3.86±0.31 ab | 3.61±0.05 a | |
9/25 | 26.40±0.45 a | 253.33±3.45 a | 6.43±0.19 c | 39.40±0.98 a | 4.10±0.10 a | 3.55±0.04 ab | |
9/29 | 24.17±0.25 b | 229.67±4.43 b | 6.78±0.42 bc | 33.94±2.29 b | 3.57±0.23 bc | 3.59±0.05 ab | |
慕合怀特234 Muhe White 234 | 9/9 | 16.57±0.33 e | 152.18±7.37 e | 8.74±0.21 a | 17.43±1.27 d | 1.90±0.08 c | 3.23±0.02 d |
9/13 | 18.90±0.16 d | 168.87±3.25 d | 7.46±1.07 ab | 22.97±3.41 cd | 2.57±0.36 bc | 3.29±0.07 cd | |
9/17 | 22.10±0.71 c | 200.09±7.40 c | 7.07±0.69 b | 28.55±3.75 bc | 3.15±0.41 ab | 3.36±0.02 bc | |
9/21 | 24.53±0.33 b | 230.57±3.63 b | 6.94±0.61 b | 33.36±2.48 ab | 3.55±0.26 a | 3.39±0.03 abc | |
9/25 | 26.20±0.50 a | 248.93±2.56 a | 6.71±0.44 b | 37.23±2.74 a | 3.92±0.35 a | 3.51±0.03 a | |
9/29 | 25.70±0.43 ab | 222.08±4.26 b | 6.48±0.71 b | 34.27±2.53 ab | 3.74±0.25 a | 3.43±0.05 ab |
Fig. 1 Polyphenol content of fruits in different sampling timesNote: Different lowercase letters indicated significant difference between different sampling times of same variety at P<0.05.
Fig. 2 Contents of tartaric acid and malic acid in fruits in different sampling timesNote: Different lowercase letters indicated significant difference between different sampling times of same variety at P<0.05.
Fig. 3 Contents of oxalic acid, citric acid and vitamin C in fruits in different sampling timesNote: Different lowercase letters indicated significant difference between different sampling times of same variety at P<0.05.
Fig. 4 Sugar content of fruit in different sampling timesNote: Different lowercase letters indicated significant difference between different sampling times of same variety at P<0.05.
指标 Index | 慕合怀特369 Muhe White 369 | 慕合怀特234 Muhe White 234 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |
总糖Total sugar | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.20 |
总酸Total acid | 0.09 | 0.01 | -0.05 | -0.08 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
糖酸比Sugar-acid ratio | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
总酚Total phenol | 0.09 | 0.00 | -0.11 | -0.05 | -0.16 | -0.35 |
单宁Tannin | -0.01 | -0.29 | 0.28 | -0.02 | 0.33 | 0.21 |
花色苷Anthocyanin | -0.03 | -0.32 | 0.11 | 0.05 | -0.20 | 0.42 |
维生素C Vitamin C | 0.08 | -0.04 | -0.15 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 0.07 |
可溶性固物含量Soluble solid content | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.21 |
固酸比Solid acid ratio | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
pH | 0.09 | 0.01 | -0.09 | -0.06 | 0.21 | -0.24 |
草酸Oxalic acid | -0.03 | 0.22 | 0.30 | -0.08 | -0.01 | 0.12 |
柠檬酸Citric acid | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.07 | -0.08 | -0.06 | -0.15 |
酒石酸Tartaric acid | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.35 | -0.08 | -0.08 | 0.17 |
苹果酸Malic acid | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.10 | -0.08 | -0.01 | 0.15 |
葡萄糖Glucose | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.11 | 0.08 | 0.06 | -0.29 |
果糖Fructose | 0.09 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.04 | -0.25 |
蔗糖Sucrose | 0.09 | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.08 | -0.08 | -0.09 |
特征值Characteristic value | 11.40 | 2.88 | 1.82 | 12.09 | 2.75 | 1.36 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 67.03 | 16.96 | 10.70 | 71.13 | 16.17 | 7.98 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 67.03 | 83.99 | 94.69 | 71.13 | 87.29 | 95.27 |
Table 3 Principal Component Analysis of Fruit Quality of ‘Muhe White’ Grape
指标 Index | 慕合怀特369 Muhe White 369 | 慕合怀特234 Muhe White 234 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |
总糖Total sugar | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.20 |
总酸Total acid | 0.09 | 0.01 | -0.05 | -0.08 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
糖酸比Sugar-acid ratio | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
总酚Total phenol | 0.09 | 0.00 | -0.11 | -0.05 | -0.16 | -0.35 |
单宁Tannin | -0.01 | -0.29 | 0.28 | -0.02 | 0.33 | 0.21 |
花色苷Anthocyanin | -0.03 | -0.32 | 0.11 | 0.05 | -0.20 | 0.42 |
维生素C Vitamin C | 0.08 | -0.04 | -0.15 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 0.07 |
可溶性固物含量Soluble solid content | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.21 |
固酸比Solid acid ratio | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
pH | 0.09 | 0.01 | -0.09 | -0.06 | 0.21 | -0.24 |
草酸Oxalic acid | -0.03 | 0.22 | 0.30 | -0.08 | -0.01 | 0.12 |
柠檬酸Citric acid | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.07 | -0.08 | -0.06 | -0.15 |
酒石酸Tartaric acid | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.35 | -0.08 | -0.08 | 0.17 |
苹果酸Malic acid | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.10 | -0.08 | -0.01 | 0.15 |
葡萄糖Glucose | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.11 | 0.08 | 0.06 | -0.29 |
果糖Fructose | 0.09 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.04 | -0.25 |
蔗糖Sucrose | 0.09 | -0.04 | 0.03 | 0.08 | -0.08 | -0.09 |
特征值Characteristic value | 11.40 | 2.88 | 1.82 | 12.09 | 2.75 | 1.36 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 67.03 | 16.96 | 10.70 | 71.13 | 16.17 | 7.98 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 67.03 | 83.99 | 94.69 | 71.13 | 87.29 | 95.27 |
品种 Variety | 采样时间 Sampling time (m/d) | F1 | F2 | F3 | F | 排名 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
慕合怀特369 Muhe White 369 | 9/9 | -1.42 | 0.25 | 0.87 | -0.82 | 6 |
9/13 | -0.83 | 0.70 | -0.27 | -0.47 | 4 | |
9/17 | -0.24 | -1.88 | -0.74 | -0.56 | 5 | |
9/21 | 0.52 | 0.93 | -1.51 | 0.35 | 3 | |
9/25 | 1.06 | 0.13 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 1 | |
9/29 | 0.91 | -0.14 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 2 | |
慕合怀特234 Muhe White 234 | 9/9 | -1.48 | 0.37 | -0.53 | -1.03 | 6 |
9/13 | -0.84 | 0.49 | 0.08 | -0.51 | 5 | |
9/17 | -0.08 | -1.94 | 0.16 | -0.36 | 4 | |
9/21 | 0.50 | 0.15 | 1.51 | 0.50 | 3 | |
9/25 | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.30 | 0.73 | 1 | |
9/29 | 1.11 | 0.02 | -1.53 | 0.67 | 2 |
Table 4 Principal Component Score on Fruit Quality of of ‘Muhe White’ Grape
品种 Variety | 采样时间 Sampling time (m/d) | F1 | F2 | F3 | F | 排名 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
慕合怀特369 Muhe White 369 | 9/9 | -1.42 | 0.25 | 0.87 | -0.82 | 6 |
9/13 | -0.83 | 0.70 | -0.27 | -0.47 | 4 | |
9/17 | -0.24 | -1.88 | -0.74 | -0.56 | 5 | |
9/21 | 0.52 | 0.93 | -1.51 | 0.35 | 3 | |
9/25 | 1.06 | 0.13 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 1 | |
9/29 | 0.91 | -0.14 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 2 | |
慕合怀特234 Muhe White 234 | 9/9 | -1.48 | 0.37 | -0.53 | -1.03 | 6 |
9/13 | -0.84 | 0.49 | 0.08 | -0.51 | 5 | |
9/17 | -0.08 | -1.94 | 0.16 | -0.36 | 4 | |
9/21 | 0.50 | 0.15 | 1.51 | 0.50 | 3 | |
9/25 | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.30 | 0.73 | 1 | |
9/29 | 1.11 | 0.02 | -1.53 | 0.67 | 2 |
1 | 李栋栋,孙慧琴,方向毅,等.“生泰”透气防渗砂对干旱区葡萄生长的影响[J].林业科技通讯,2019(3):58-59. |
2 | 滕玉风,马力,占玉芳,等.河西走廊民勤人工梭梭林群落的物种多样性研究[J].中国水土保持,2019(1):43-46, 69. |
TENG Y F, MA L, ZHAN Y F, et al.. Species diversity of artificial haloxylon ammodendron forest community in Minqin of Hexi Corridor [J]. Soil Water Conserv. China, 2019(1): 43-46, 69. | |
3 | 郭承录,李宗礼,陈年来,等.石羊河流域下游民勤绿洲草地退化问题分析[J].草业学报,2010,19(6):62-71. |
GUO C L, LI Z L, CHEN N L, et al.. The grassland degrsdation problems of the Minqin oasis, in the lower reaches of the Shiyang River Basin [J]. Acta Pratac. Sin., 2010,19(6):62-71. | |
4 | 杨中杰,王兴刚,李守强.民勤县发展酿酒葡萄产业优势及建议[J].甘肃农业科技,2020(9):71-75. |
5 | 牛立新,贺普超.酿酒葡萄的最佳采收期[J].果树科学,1991(4):229-232. |
NIU L X, HE P C. The best harvest time of wine grapes [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 1991(4):229-232. | |
6 | 彭媛媛,高展,董凯向,等.不同采收期对新疆焉耆盆地酿酒葡萄及葡萄酒品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2018,55(7):1252-1263. |
PENG Y Y, GAO Z, DONG K X, et al.. Effects of the suitable harvest time for main wine grapes and wine quality in Xinjiang basin [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2018, 55(7):1252-1263. | |
7 | 王宇,兰义宾,孙亮,等.延迟采收对‘梅鹿辄’葡萄果实品质的影响[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(7):84-91. |
WANG Y, LAN Y B, SUN L, et al.. Effect of extenged harvest on the ‘Merlot’ grape [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2015, 24(7):84-91. | |
8 | 杨哲,成果,高媛,等.疏穗处理对‘赤霞珠’葡萄果粒大小及花色苷积累的影响[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(2):111-121. |
YANG Z, CHENG G, GAO Y, et al.. Effects of cluster thinning on berry size and anthocyanins of Cabernet Sauvignon [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2015, 24(2):111-121. | |
9 | 彭媛媛,周龙,董凯向,等.新疆主要白葡萄酒品种适宜采收期[J].食品工业科技,2018,39(20):41-46. |
PENG Y Y, ZHOU L, DONG K X, et al.. Suitable harvest time of main wine grape in Xinjiang [J]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2018, 39(20):41-46. | |
10 | 梁冬梅,张卫强,李记明.蛇龙珠葡萄最佳采收期的研究[J].酿酒科技,2006(5):46-48. |
LIANG D M, ZHANG W Q, LI J M. Study on the best harvest time of Cabernet Sauvignon [J]. Liquor-Making Sci. Technol., 2006(5):46-48. | |
11 | 刘敏,闵卓,鞠延仑,等.全球气候变暖对葡萄和葡萄酒品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(4):177-182. |
LIU M, MIN Z, JU Y L, et al.. Effects of global warming on grape and wine quality [J]. Northern Hortic., 2017(4):177-182. | |
13 | 孟江飞,杨学威,房玉林,等.不同采收期对梅尔诺葡萄和葡萄酒酚类物质及抗氧化活性的影响[J].中国食品学报,2012,12(10):155-162. |
MENG J F, YANG X W, FANG Y L, et al.. Effects of harvest times on phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of merlot grapes and wines [J]. J. Chin. Institute Food Sci. Technol., 2012, 12(10):155-162. | |
14 | 唐虎利,张振文,孙莹,等.新疆玛纳斯县赤霞珠葡萄最佳采收期的研究[J].中国酿造,2009(10):78-81. |
TANG H L, ZHANG Z W, SUN Y, et al.. Best harvest time of Cabernet Sauvignon grape from Manasi in Xinjiang [J]. China Brew., 2009(10):78-81. | |
15 | 屠婷瑶,孟江飞,魏晓峰,等.山西乡宁赤霞珠葡萄最佳采收期研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(5):139-146. |
TU T Y, MENG J F, WEI X F, et al.. Optimal harvest time of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes in Xiangning, Shanxi [J]. J. Northwest A&F Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2017, 45(5):139-146. | |
16 | 李彦彪,马维峰,贾进,等.河西走廊不同产地‘赤霞珠’酿酒葡萄果实品质评价[J].西北植物学报,2021,41(5):817-827. |
LI Y B, MA W F, JIA J, et al.. Evaluation on fruit quality of' Cabernet Sauvignon wine grapes from different producing areas in Hexi Corridor [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021, 41(5):817-827. | |
17 | 樊丁宇,谢辉,闫鹏,等.葡萄干品质指标探讨及因子分析[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(3):137-141. |
FAN D Y, XIE H, YAN P, et al.. Qualitative and factor analysis of raisin [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2012, 21(3):137-141. | |
18 | 王治同,梁瑞,南海龙.福林-酚法测定成熟期左优红浆果中的总酚含量[J].食品工业,2018,39(8):287-290. |
WANG Z T, LIANG R, NAN H L. Determination of total phenol content in Zuoyouhong berries by folin-ciocalteu [J]. Food Ind., 2018, 39(8):287-290. | |
19 | JAYAPRAKASHA G K, SINGH R P, SAKARIAH K K. Antioxidant activity of grape seed (Vitis vinifera) extracts on peroxidation models in vitro [J]. Food Chem., 2001, 73(3):285-290. |
20 | HARBERTSON J F, PARPINELLO G P, HEYMANN H, et al.. Impact of exogenous tannin additions on wine chemistry and wine sensory character [J]. Food Chem., 2012, 131(3):999-1008. |
21 | 苏鹏飞.宁夏青铜峡产区主栽红色酿酒葡萄成熟度控制指标的研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016. |
SU P F. Study on maturity control index of main red wine grapes form Qingtongxia city in Ningxia [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2016. | |
22 | 王华.葡萄酒分析检验[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2011:1-238. |
23 | 李记明.关于葡萄品质的评价指标[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,1999(1):54-57. |
LI J M. Evaluation index of grape quality [J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine Wine, 1999(1):54-57. | |
24 | 丁琦,李琪,张晓煜,等.宁夏贺兰山东麓产区马瑟兰葡萄最佳采收期的确定[J].果树学报,2020,37(4):533-539. |
DING Q, LI Q, ZHANG X Y, et al.. Determination of the optimal harvesting period for ‘Marselan’ grape in the east of Helan mountain region [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2020, 37(4):533-539. | |
25 | LAMIKANRA O, NYANG I D, LEONG S. Distribution and effect of grape maturity on organic acid content of Red Muscadine Grapes [J]. J. Agric. Food Chem., 1991, 43(12):3026-3028. |
26 | 孟鑫.转色前叶果比对“赤霞珠”和“北红”葡萄品质的影响[D].银川:宁夏大学,2016. |
MENG X. Effect of leaf-cluster ratio on fruit quality of “Cabernet Sauvignon” and “Bei hong” grapevine before version [D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2016. | |
27 | 钟海霞.新疆8个葡萄品种糖组分及含量比较分析[J].新疆农业科学,2019,56(7):80-87. |
ZHONG H X. Comparative analysis of sugar composition and content of eight grape cultivars in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2019, 56(7):80-87. | |
28 | 李春丽,董清华,冯永庆,等.葡萄果实始熟期前后糖和pH值及ABA变化[J].北京农学院学报,2010(2):14-17. |
LI C L, DONG Q H, FENG Y Q, et al..Changes of sugar, pH and ABA around the onset of grape berry ripening [J]. J. Beijing Agric. Coll., 2010(2):14-17. | |
29 | 黄艳,文露,庞亚卓,等.喷施钙肥对‘夏黑’葡萄果实糖酸积累的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2020(2):166-172. |
HUANG Y, WEN L, PANG Y Z, et al.. Effect of spraying calcium on sugar and acid accumulation in ‘Summer Black’ grape [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2020(2):166-172. |
[1] | Ruyue WANG, Haifang HU, Shasha LUO, Ziyi ZHEN, Yeyong XU, Xiaojing HU. Fruit Quality Analysis of Prunus domestica × armeniaca at Different Harvest Maturity Levels [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 158-169. |
[2] | Ting WANG, Jinghan DU, Guangdi ZHANG, Jianglong WANG, Yinan JIA, Yu WANG, Wenyi BAO. Study on Quality and Volatile Substances of New Excellent Cabbage Varieties in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 165-180. |
[3] | Xueqing WANG, Bo ZHANG, Liting HAN, Zhuanzhuan LYU, Jianjun CHEN, Zhulin ZHANG, Junqiang ZHANG, Jianmei DU. Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing on Volatile Compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 146-158. |
[4] | Xianyin SUN, Qiuhuan MU, Yong MI, Guangde LYU, Xiaolei QI, Yingying SUN, Xundong YIN, Ruixia WANG, Ke WU, Zhaoguo QIAN, Yan ZHAO, Minggang GAO. Classification and Evaluation of New Wheat Lines Based on GT Biplot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 14-24. |
[5] | Dengyang LU, Panpan TONG, Min YAN, Jingkai BAO, Mingzhe LIU, Yilei XIA, Cuiyun WU. Identification and Evaluation of Korla Pear Bud Sport with Larger Fruit Size [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 52-64. |
[6] | Yutao SHI, Huizhen XIE, Shulin ZHENG, Guanhua YU, Feiquan WANG, Li LI, Bo ZHANG, Yuanhua LI, Shengcai LUO. Analysis of Biochemical Characteristics and Superoxide Anion Radical Scavenging Activity of Tea Polysaccharides of Local Tea Germplasms in Wuyishan [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 65-76. |
[7] | Yue PAN, Baoqing WANG, Jijiao WANG, Yong MA, Yalan LI. CO2 Response Model Fitting and Evaluation of Vitis amurensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 58-66. |
[8] | Tingting CAO, Chun LIU, Youwei FAN, Li MA, Zhiyu REN, Suxia YUAN, Junyun ZHANG, Zunyao QIAN, Guangzhao YANG. Effects of Different Nitrogen Supply Level on Plant Growth and Development in Miniature Potted Rose [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 67-79. |
[9] | Panpan MENG, Haiyan HE, Yuxin CAO, Lixin ZHANG, Qinghao LYU, Ruilin QI, Hongrui ZHANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of 5 Cultivation Types of Medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. at Branching Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 90-99. |
[10] | Boyan XIE, Lijing KONG, Yubin ZHANG, Chenglong SUN, Siyuan ZHAO, Minghui ZHANG, Shengci FAN, Zengxu XIANG, Jinshuang ZHENG. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis of Atractylodes chinensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(12): 39-49. |
[11] | Yuan HE, Xiaotong GU, Liqing FENG, Huijun DUAN, Yongsheng TAO. Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance Index for Maize Hybrids During Seedling and Germination Stages [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 30-40. |
[12] | Shengmei LI, Bo PANG, Shiwei GENG, Wu SONG, Hongmei LI, Maosen MA, Ru ZHANG, Xinyan WANG, Wenwei GAO. Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Gossypium hirsutum L. × Gossypium barbadense L. Backross Populations in Full Boll Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 40-51. |
[13] | Shijian BAI, Jinge HU, Jiuyun WU, Wen ZHANG, Hui XIE, Ronghua ZHAO, Guang CHEN, Junshe CAI. Effects of Rootstocks on the Growth Characteristics and Fruit Quality of ‘Crimson Seedless’ Grapes in Turpan Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 76-87. |
[14] | Qianqian LU, Abuduwaili Abulimiti, Yixing HOU, Zhihui LI, Shuang WANG, Long ZHOU. Research of the Photosynthetic Characteristics of 7 Table Grape Varieties Under Compound Salt-alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 63-76. |
[15] | Shijiang ZHU, Hu LI, Wen XU, Yating FENG. Effects of Soil Moisture Content on Fruit Quality in Citrus Orchards Within Three Gorges Reservoir Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 201-207. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||