中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 70-81.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0963
收稿日期:
2021-11-05
接受日期:
2022-01-18
出版日期:
2022-06-15
发布日期:
2022-06-21
通讯作者:
徐凌川
作者简介:
李洁 E-mail:953289297@ qq. com;
基金资助:
Jie LI1(), Ying LIN1, Meiyu XU1, Fei WANG2, Lingchuan XU1(
)
Received:
2021-11-05
Accepted:
2022-01-18
Online:
2022-06-15
Published:
2022-06-21
Contact:
Lingchuan XU
摘要:
为了解泰山白首乌根际土壤微生物群落结构和组成,充分利用根际微生物资源,采用Illumina MiSeq高通量测序技术,分析测定来自山东省莱芜市莲花山(LW)和济南市历下区(LX)、长清区(CQ)3个产地的泰山白首乌根茎10和20 cm深度根际土壤真菌群落的丰富度和多样性。结果表明,6个样品共得到真菌1 589个OTUs,分属于11门35纲84目142科237属。子囊菌门(Ascomycota)和被孢霉门(Mortierellomycota)是6个样品共同的优势菌门。样品CQ20的群落丰度和多样性最高,样品LX20的真菌群落分布最均匀;随着地下根茎深度加深,真菌微生物群落的丰度和多样性增大。不同产地和根茎深度样品间土壤真菌群落存在显著差异,上述结果为优选根际促生菌、提高仿野生种植技术提供了理论依据。
中图分类号:
李洁, 林莹, 徐美玉, 王飞, 徐凌川. 泰山白首乌根际土壤真菌多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 70-81.
Jie LI, Ying LIN, Meiyu XU, Fei WANG, Lingchuan XU. Sequencing Analysis of Fungal Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil of Cynanchum bungei Decne[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 70-81.
样品 Sample | 序列数 Sequence number | 碱基数 Base number | 平均长度 Mean length/bp | 最小长度 Min. length/bp | 最大长度 Max. length/bp | 操作分类 单元数OTUs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW10 | 68 579 | 18 104 375 | 263.99 | 47 | 380 | 244 |
LW20 | 68 939 | 17 199 374 | 249.49 | 43 | 490 | 175 |
LX10 | 58 106 | 16 270 921 | 280.02 | 44 | 391 | 216 |
LX20 | 64 833 | 20 109 613 | 310.18 | 42 | 491 | 337 |
CQ10 | 49 236 | 14 888 556 | 302.39 | 42 | 490 | 259 |
CQ20 | 68 679 | 19 492 433 | 283.82 | 42 | 491 | 358 |
表1 泰山白首乌根际土壤检测序列结果
Table 1 Sequence results of rhizosphere soil of Cynanchum bungei Decne
样品 Sample | 序列数 Sequence number | 碱基数 Base number | 平均长度 Mean length/bp | 最小长度 Min. length/bp | 最大长度 Max. length/bp | 操作分类 单元数OTUs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW10 | 68 579 | 18 104 375 | 263.99 | 47 | 380 | 244 |
LW20 | 68 939 | 17 199 374 | 249.49 | 43 | 490 | 175 |
LX10 | 58 106 | 16 270 921 | 280.02 | 44 | 391 | 216 |
LX20 | 64 833 | 20 109 613 | 310.18 | 42 | 491 | 337 |
CQ10 | 49 236 | 14 888 556 | 302.39 | 42 | 490 | 259 |
CQ20 | 68 679 | 19 492 433 | 283.82 | 42 | 491 | 358 |
图1 泰山白首乌根际土壤样品间Veen图A: 6个样品组;B:地下10 cm样品组;C:地下20 cm样品组
Fig. 1 Veen diagram of rhizosphere soil samples of Cynanchum bungei DecneA: 6 sample groups; B: Sample group underground 10 cm; C: Sample group underground 20 cm
样品Sample | Chao 指数 Chao index | Ace 指数 Ace index | Shannon指数Shannon index | Simpson指数Simpson index | Shannon均匀指数Shannon even index | 覆盖度 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW10 | 254.01 | 256.96 | 2.83 | 0.13 | 0.51 | 1.0 |
LW20 | 190.95 | 192.75 | 1.87 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 1.0 |
LX10 | 227.11 | 227.59 | 2.39 | 0.23 | 0.44 | 1.0 |
LX20 | 340.75 | 342.87 | 3.71 | 0.07 | 0.64 | 1.0 |
CQ10 | 264.53 | 264.62 | 3.50 | 0.10 | 0.63 | 1.0 |
CQ20 | 361.75 | 363.10 | 3.69 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 1.0 |
表2 泰山白首乌根际土壤真菌多样性指数统计表
Table 2 Statistical table of rhizosphere soil fungal diversity index of Cynanchum bungei Decne
样品Sample | Chao 指数 Chao index | Ace 指数 Ace index | Shannon指数Shannon index | Simpson指数Simpson index | Shannon均匀指数Shannon even index | 覆盖度 Coverage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW10 | 254.01 | 256.96 | 2.83 | 0.13 | 0.51 | 1.0 |
LW20 | 190.95 | 192.75 | 1.87 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 1.0 |
LX10 | 227.11 | 227.59 | 2.39 | 0.23 | 0.44 | 1.0 |
LX20 | 340.75 | 342.87 | 3.71 | 0.07 | 0.64 | 1.0 |
CQ10 | 264.53 | 264.62 | 3.50 | 0.10 | 0.63 | 1.0 |
CQ20 | 361.75 | 363.10 | 3.69 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 1.0 |
分类Taxonomy | LW10 | LW20 | LX10 | LX20 | CQ10 | CQ20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
门Plylum | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 |
纲Class | 18 | 17 | 21 | 29 | 23 | 24 |
目Order | 44 | 40 | 53 | 60 | 49 | 58 |
科Family | 73 | 58 | 85 | 106 | 86 | 106 |
属Genus | 104 | 75 | 114 | 142 | 130 | 169 |
种Species | 167 | 116 | 171 | 229 | 196 | 268 |
表3 泰山白首乌样品在不同分类水平上的数目
Table 3 Number of Cynanchum bungei Decne samples at different classification levels
分类Taxonomy | LW10 | LW20 | LX10 | LX20 | CQ10 | CQ20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
门Plylum | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 |
纲Class | 18 | 17 | 21 | 29 | 23 | 24 |
目Order | 44 | 40 | 53 | 60 | 49 | 58 |
科Family | 73 | 58 | 85 | 106 | 86 | 106 |
属Genus | 104 | 75 | 114 | 142 | 130 | 169 |
种Species | 167 | 116 | 171 | 229 | 196 | 268 |
1 | 印鑫,丁永芳,邵久针,等.白首乌的研究进展[J].中草药,2019,50(4):992-1000. |
YIN X, DING Y F, SHAO J Z, et al.. Research progress on Cynanchi Bungei Radix [J]. Chin. Trad. Herbal Drugs, 2019, 50(4):992-1000. | |
2 | 刘佳,牛景梅,赵进红,等.泰山白首乌研究进展[J].广东化工,2019,46(6):119-120. |
LIU J, NIU J M, ZHAO J H, et al.. Research progress of Cynanchum bungei Decne [J]. Guangdong Chem. Ind., 2019, 46(6):119-120. | |
3 | 陈东伟,胡明哲,李克明,等.泰山白首乌的药理作用和临床应用[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(54):10666-10667. |
4 | 庄子锐,王明亮,彭蕴茹,等.白首乌C21甾苷通过TLR4通路防治大鼠肝肾纤维化的作用研究[J].中国中药杂志,2021,46(11):2857-2864. |
ZHUANG Z R, WANG M L, PENG Y R, et al.. Effect of C21 steroidal glycoside of Cynanchi Bungei Radix on liver and kidney fibrosis in rats through TLR4 pathway [J]. Chin. J. Trad. Chin. Med., 2021, 46(11):2857-2864. | |
5 | 牛景梅,吕宝兴,赵进红,等.泰山白首乌中白首乌二苯酮在大鼠体内药代动力学研究[J].泰山医学院学报,2020,41(5):349-352. |
NIU J M, LV B X, ZHAO J H, et al.. Pharmacokinetics of diphenyl ketone from Cynanchum bungei Decne in rats [J]. J. Taishan Med. Coll., 2020, 41(5):349-352. | |
6 | 张明,顾小兵,李春阳,等.白首乌水旱轮作种植技术研究[J].农业开发与装备,2020(11):197-198. |
ZHANG M, GU X B, LI C Y, et al.. Study on water and drought rotation planting technology of Cynanchum bungei Decne [J]. Agric. Develop. Equip., 2020(11):197-198. | |
7 | 毛爱华,周丽娟,毛广才.“苏乌1号”白首乌高产高效配套栽培技术[J].南方农业,2019,13(35):31-32, 34. |
MAO A H, ZHOU L J, MAO G C. High yield and high efficiency cultivation techniques of “Suwu No. 1” Cynanchum bungei Decne [J]. Southern Agric., 2019, 13(35):31-32, 34. | |
8 | 吴承东,张明.几种土壤封闭除草剂对白首乌田的除草效果试验[J].农业开发与装备,2017(11):94. |
WU C D, ZHANG M. Effects of several soil blocking herbicides on Baishouwu field [J]. Agric. Develop. Equip., 2017(11):94. | |
9 | 王朋强,吴义兰,李永富,等.植物根系分泌物及微域环境的研究与展望[J].乡村科技,2021,12(27):96-98. |
10 | 唐杰,陈知青,郭安南,等.不同作物根际土壤微生物的群落结构特征分析[J].核农学报,2021,35(12):2830-2840. |
TANG J, CHEN Z Q, GUO A N, et al.. Community structure characteristics of soil microorganisms in rhizosphere of different crops [J]. J. Nuclear Agric., 2021, 35(12):2830-2840. | |
11 | 杨露,辛建攀,田如男.根际微生物对植物重金属胁迫的缓解作用及其机理研究进展[J].生物技术通报,2022,38(3):213-225. |
YANG L, XIN J P, TIAN R N. Research progress on mitigation effect and mechanism of rhizosphere microorganisms on plant heavy metal stress [J]. Biotechnol. Bull., 2022,38(3):213-225. | |
12 | 连文慧,董雷,李文均.土壤环境下的根际微生物和植物互作关系研究进展[J].微生物学杂志,2021,41(4):74-83. |
LIAN W H, DONG L, LI W J. Research progress on interaction between rhizosphere microorganisms and plants in soil environment [J]. J. Microbiol., 2021, 41(4):74-83. | |
13 | 任春光,苏文文,潘丽珊,等.基于高通量测序研究猕猴桃苗不同生育期根际真菌群落结构及多样性[J].土壤,2021,53(3):545-554. |
REN C G, SU W W, PAN L S, et al.. Study on rhizosphere fungal community structure and diversity of kiwifruit seedlings at different growth stages based on high throughput sequencing [J]. Soils, 2021, 53(3):545-554. | |
14 | 付丽娜,汪娅婷,王星,等.三七连作根际微生物多样性研究[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2018,33(2):198-207. |
FU L N, WANG Y T, WANG X, et al.. Study on microbial diversity in rhizosphere of Panax notoginseng continuous cropping [J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2018, 33(2):198-207. | |
15 | 张艳琪,周甜甜,彭川岳,等.泰山白首乌根际土壤真菌分离纯化及抗菌活性研究[J].中国抗生素杂志,2021,46(6):552-556. |
ZHANG Y Q, ZHOU T T, PENG C Y, et al.. Isolation, purification and antibacterial activity of rhizosphere soil fungi from Cynanchum bungei Decne [J]. Chin. J. Antibiotics, 2021, 46(6):552-556. | |
16 | CHEN W H, ZHANG Z Z, BAN Y F, et al.. Cynanchum bungei Decne and its two related species for “Baishouwu”: a review on traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological activities [J/OL]. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2019, 243:112110 [2021-10-05]. . |
17 | 顾晓洁,解卓学,吕嘉东,等.白首乌内生细菌分离鉴定及系统发育树分析[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2018,20(6):52-56. |
GU X J, XIE Z X, LV J D, et al.. Isolation, identification and phylogenetic tree analysis of endophytic bacteria from Cynanchum bungei Decne [J]. J. Liaoning Univ. TCM, 2018, 20(6):52-56. | |
18 | 杨光柱,黄文静,郑丽萍,等.基于高通量测序的苹果根腐病病株和健株根际土壤细菌组成与多样性分析[J].西南农业学报,2021,34(9):1865-1869. |
YANG G Z, HUANG W J, ZHENG L P, et al.. Analysis of bacterial composition and diversity in rhizosphere soil of diseased and healthy apple root rot plants based on high throughput sequencing [J]. J. Southwest Agric., 2021, 34(9):1865-1869. | |
19 | 刘元,李守婷,申进文,等.基于GSS高通量测序技术的怀山药根、茎中内生真菌群落多样性分析[J].浙江农业科学,2018,59(1):64-68. |
LIU Y, LI S T, SHEN J W, et al.. Diversity analysis of endophytic fungi community in roots and stems of Huaishan herb based on GSS high throughput sequencing technology [J]. Zhejiang Agric. Sci., 2018, 59(1):64-68. | |
20 | 吴秋芳,侯立江,何玲敏,等.北艾根际与非根际土壤微生物多样性的高通量测序分析[J].河南农业大学学报,2021,55(5):928-935. |
WU Q F, HOU L J, HE L M, et al.. High throughput sequencing analysis of microbial diversity in rhizosphere and non rhizosphere soil of Artemisia argyi [J]. J. Henan Agric.Univ., 2021, 55(5):928-935. | |
21 | 程立君,王磊,吴银梅,等.高通量测序技术分析光叶珙桐根际土壤微生物多样性[J].广东农业科学,2019,46(1):43-49. |
CHENG L J, WANG L, WU Y M, et al.. Analysis of rhizosphere soil microbial diversity of Davidia involucrata by high throughput sequencing [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2019, 46(1):43-49. | |
22 | 翁志强,许钰滢,吕正阳,等.巨菌草根际土壤微生物群落代谢功能多样性分析[J].广东农业科学,2021,48(4):62-68. |
WENG Z Q, XU Y Y, LYU Z Y, et al.. Analysis on metabolic function diversity of soil microbial community in rhizosphere of giant fungus grass [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2021, 48(4):62-68. | |
23 | 王海斌,陈晓婷,丁力,等.连作茶树根际土壤自毒潜力、酶活性及微生物群落功能多样性分析[J].热带作物学报,2018,39(5):852-857. |
WANG H B, CHEN X T, DING L, et al.. Analysis of autotoxic potential, enzyme activity and functional diversity of microbial community in rhizosphere soil of continuous cropping tea [J]. J. Tropical Crops, 2018, 39(5):825-857. | |
24 | 陈冉,刘志强,王丹丹.基于高通量测序比较不同产地药用银杏根际土壤微生物多样性[J].药物生物技术,2021,28(2):117-122. |
CHEN R, LIU Z Q, WANG D D. Comparison of microbial diversity in rhizosphere soil of medicinal Ginkgo biloba from different habitats based on high throughput sequencing [J]. Pharm Biotechnol., 2021, 28(2):117-122. | |
25 | 官鑫,向阳,祝友朋,等.核桃根际土壤微生物群落功能多样性分析[C]// 中国植物病理学会.中国植物病理学会2019年学术年会论文集.北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2019:1. |
26 | 郑雪芳,苏远科,刘波,等.不同海拔茶树根系土壤微生物群落多样性分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(4):866-871. |
ZHENG X F, SU Y K, LIU B, et al.. Diversity analysis of soil microbial communities in tea roots at different altitudes [J]. Chin. J. Ecol. Agric., 2010, 18(4):866-871. | |
27 | 李毳,刘怡.晋东南3种道地药材植物根际真菌群落特性[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(7):1388-1393. |
LI C, LIU Y. Characteristics of rhizosphere fungal communities of three genuine medicinal plants in Southeast Shanxi [J]. J. Ecol. Environ., 2019, 28(7):1388-1393. | |
28 | SHEN C C, SHI Y, NI Y Y, et al.. Dramatic increases of soil microbial functional gene diversity at the treeline ecotone of Changbai Mountain [J/OL]. Front Microbiol., 2016,7:1184 [2021-07-15]. . |
29 | 褚海燕,冯毛毛,柳旭,等.土壤微生物生物地理学:国内进展与国际前沿[J].土壤学报,2020,57(3):515-529. |
ZHE H Y, FENG M M, LIU X, et al.. Soil microbial biogeography: domestic progress and international frontier [J]. J. Soil Sci., 2020, 57(3):515-529. | |
30 | ZHANG Y G, LIU X, CONG J, et al.. The microbially mediated soil organic carbon loss under degenerative succession in an alpine meadow [J]. Mol. Ecol., 2017, 26(14):3676-3686. |
31 | 付亚娟,张江丽,侯晓强.大花杓兰根际与非根际土壤真菌多样性的高通量测序分析[J].西北农业学报,2019, 28(2):253-259. |
FU Y J, ZHANG J L, HOU X Q. High-throughput sequencing analysis of fungal diversity in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of Cyclobalanopsis grandiflora [J]. J. Northwest Agric., 2019, 28(2):253-259. | |
32 | 卢宝慧,高成林,赵玥,等.运用高通量测序技术分析人参不同栽培模式根际土壤微生物多样性[J].东北林业大学学报,2021,49(3):113-119. |
LU B H, GAO C L, ZHAO Y, et al.. Analysis of microbial diversity in rhizosphere soil under different cultivation patterns of ginseng by high-throughput sequencing [J]. J. Northeast For.Univ., 2021, 49(3):113-119. | |
33 | 祝蕾,严辉,刘培,等.药用植物根际微生物对其品质形成的影响及其作用机制的研究进展[J].中草药,2021,52(13):4064-4073. |
ZHU L, YAN H, LIU P, et al.. Research progress on the effect of rhizosphere microorganisms on the quality formation of medicinal plants and its mechanism of action [J]. Chin. Herbal Medic., 2021, 52(13):4064-4073. | |
34 | 孟祥才,沈莹,杜虹韦.道地药材概念及其使用规范的探讨[J].中草药,2019,50(24):6135-6141. |
MENG X C, SHEN Y, DU H W. Discussion on the concept of genuine medicinal materials and their use specifications [J]. Chin. Tradit. Herbal Drugs, 2019, 50(24):6135-6141. |
[1] | 闫宁, 战宇, 苗馨月, 王二刚, 陈长宝, 李琼. 强还原土壤灭菌处理对人参连作土壤细菌群落结构及土壤酶活的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 133-144. |
[2] | 赵宏岩, 谭君伟, 张杰, 陈浩楠, 王春旭, 赵地, 李海鹏, 朱李霞, 韩毅强. 小豆和绿豆茎基感病部位真菌群落结构研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 129-136. |
[3] | 魏艳晨, 陈吉祥, 王永刚, 孟彤彤, 韩亚龙, 李美. 荒漠植物珍珠猪毛菜根际土壤细菌多样性与土壤理化性质相关性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 209-217. |
[4] | 苏雨萌§,张旭婷§,特日格乐,田敏,尚晓蕊,李国婧,王瑞刚*. 高通量测序鉴定中间锦鸡儿干旱条件下的microRNA[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 51-57. |
[5] | 张庆1,2,赵晓美2,王娉2,刘冰1*,陈颖2*. 食品中产毒真菌核酸检测方法的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 91-98. |
[6] | 刘璐1,名晓东1,张晓艳2,郝俊杰2,付丽平1,王乾坤1,吕鑫1,陈旺1,刘全兰1*. 高通量测序分析蚕豆种子内生细菌的多样性[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 73-80. |
[7] | 殷全玉1,刘健豪1,刘国顺1,杨欣铃2,李小福2,张玉兰1,李阳1,叶红朝3*. 连续4年施用生物炭对植烟褐土微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(1): 176-185. |
[8] | 赵虎1,2,王海斌2,3*,陈晓婷2,3,王裕华2,张华彬2,丁力2,孔祥海2,师桂英1*. 茶树根际土壤氮素组成及其吸收利用效率分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7): 148-153. |
[9] | 杨晶晶,张青青*,吐尔逊娜依·热依木,阿马努拉·依明尼亚孜,雪热提江·麦提努日. 游牧和定居对伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤真菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7): 166-173. |
[10] | 赵兴丽1,陶刚2,3*,娄璇4,顾金刚5*. 钩状木霉在辣椒根际定殖动态及其对辣椒疫病的生物防治[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(5): 106-114. |
[11] | 高林1,王新伟1,申国明1,田峰2,陈前锋2,张明发2,张成省1*. 不同连作年限植烟土壤细菌和真菌群落结构差异[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 147-152. |
[12] | 史芳芳,李向泉*. 葡萄根际土壤真菌群落多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(7): 47-58. |
[13] | 顾美英1§,杨蓉1§,徐万里2*,唐光木2,张志东1,张云舒2,冯雷2,王宁1,詹发强1 . 棉秆炭配施生物有机肥对连作棉花根际土壤微生态和棉花生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(10): 47-57. |
[14] | 张艺洁,邵惠芳*,张珂,贾宏昉,黄五星,韩丹. 基于高通量测序研究施肥对连作植烟土壤环境及微生物的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(5): 16-25. |
[15] | 龚治翔1,马晓寒1,任志广1,朱金峰2,黄元炯3,王蒙蒙1,陈征1,许自成1*. 连作烤烟根际土壤细菌群落16S rDNA-PCR-DGGE分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(2): 39-47. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||