Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 131-139.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.1023
• INTELLIGENT AGRICULTURE & AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY • Previous Articles
Guoqiang DUN1(), Lei WANG2(
), Xinxin JI2, Xinbo JIANG2, Yu ZHAO3, Na GUO2
Received:
2022-11-23
Accepted:
2023-04-25
Online:
2024-08-15
Published:
2024-08-12
Contact:
Lei WANG
顿国强1(), 王雷2(
), 纪欣鑫2, 姜新波2, 赵宇3, 郭娜2
通讯作者:
王雷
作者简介:
顿国强 E-mail:dunguoqiangpatent@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Guoqiang DUN, Lei WANG, Xinxin JI, Xinbo JIANG, Yu ZHAO, Na GUO. Calibration and Verification of Discrete Element Parameters of Jinxiang Purple Garlic Seeds[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 131-139.
顿国强, 王雷, 纪欣鑫, 姜新波, 赵宇, 郭娜. 金乡紫皮蒜种离散元参数标定与试验验证[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 131-139.
序号Number | 试验参数Test parameters | 低水平Low level | 高水平High level |
---|---|---|---|
A | 蒜种-PLA塑料板滚动摩擦系数 Rolling friction coefficient of garlic seed PLA plastic plate | 0.207 | 0.294 |
B | 蒜种-蒜种滚动摩擦系数 Rolling friction coefficient between garlic seeds | 0.236 | 0.314 |
C | 蒜种-PLA塑料板碰撞恢复系数 Coefficient of restitution of garlic PLA plastic plate collision | 0.537 | 0.675 |
D | 蒜种-蒜种碰撞恢复系数 Collision coefficient of restitution between garlic seeds | 0.456 | 0.562 |
E | 蒜种-蒜种静摩擦系数 Coefficient of static friction between garlic seeds | 0.401 | 0.476 |
F | 蒜种-PLA塑料板静摩擦系数 Static friction coefficient of garlic seed PLA plastic plate | 0.373 | 0.402 |
G | 泊松比 Poisson ratio | 0.2 | 0.5 |
H | 剪切模量 Shear modulus | 1e+07 | 3e+08 |
Table 1 Parameters of Plackett-Burman test
序号Number | 试验参数Test parameters | 低水平Low level | 高水平High level |
---|---|---|---|
A | 蒜种-PLA塑料板滚动摩擦系数 Rolling friction coefficient of garlic seed PLA plastic plate | 0.207 | 0.294 |
B | 蒜种-蒜种滚动摩擦系数 Rolling friction coefficient between garlic seeds | 0.236 | 0.314 |
C | 蒜种-PLA塑料板碰撞恢复系数 Coefficient of restitution of garlic PLA plastic plate collision | 0.537 | 0.675 |
D | 蒜种-蒜种碰撞恢复系数 Collision coefficient of restitution between garlic seeds | 0.456 | 0.562 |
E | 蒜种-蒜种静摩擦系数 Coefficient of static friction between garlic seeds | 0.401 | 0.476 |
F | 蒜种-PLA塑料板静摩擦系数 Static friction coefficient of garlic seed PLA plastic plate | 0.373 | 0.402 |
G | 泊松比 Poisson ratio | 0.2 | 0.5 |
H | 剪切模量 Shear modulus | 1e+07 | 3e+08 |
水平 Level | B:蒜种间滚动摩擦系数 Rolling friction coefficient between garlic | E:蒜种间静摩擦系数 Static friction coefficient between garlic |
---|---|---|
1.414 | 0.314 | 0.476 |
1 | 0.303 | 0.465 |
0 | 0.275 | 0.439 |
-1 | 0.247 | 0.412 |
-1.414 | 0.236 | 0.401 |
Table 2 Factor level of CCD test
水平 Level | B:蒜种间滚动摩擦系数 Rolling friction coefficient between garlic | E:蒜种间静摩擦系数 Static friction coefficient between garlic |
---|---|---|
1.414 | 0.314 | 0.476 |
1 | 0.303 | 0.465 |
0 | 0.275 | 0.439 |
-1 | 0.247 | 0.412 |
-1.414 | 0.236 | 0.401 |
序号 Number | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | 堆积角 Repose angle/(°) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 28.35 |
2 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 30.14 |
3 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 24.56 |
4 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 29.61 |
5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 25.5 |
6 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 23.42 |
7 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 27.15 |
8 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 27.6 |
9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 28.32 |
10 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 27.41 |
11 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 26.21 |
12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 24.45 |
Table 3 Scheme and result of Plackett-Burman test
序号 Number | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | 堆积角 Repose angle/(°) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 28.35 |
2 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 30.14 |
3 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 24.56 |
4 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 29.61 |
5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 25.5 |
6 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 23.42 |
7 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 27.15 |
8 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 27.6 |
9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 28.32 |
10 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 27.41 |
11 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 26.21 |
12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 24.45 |
方差来源 Variance sources | 堆积角 Repose angle | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value | |
模型Model | 48.04 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 23.71 | 0.012 4 |
A | 0.23 | 1.00 | 0.23 | 0.91 | 0.411 2 |
B | 33.80 | 1.00 | 33.80 | 133.49 | 0.001 4 |
C | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 0.80 | 0.436 8 |
D | 1.08 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 4.27 | 0.130 8 |
E | 10.45 | 1.00 | 10.45 | 41.28 | 0.007 6 |
F | 1.07 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 4.22 | 0.132 3 |
G | 1.13 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 4.46 | 0.125 2 |
H | 0.07 | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.29 | 0.627 2 |
Table 4 Variance analysis of Plackett-Burman test
方差来源 Variance sources | 堆积角 Repose angle | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value | |
模型Model | 48.04 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 23.71 | 0.012 4 |
A | 0.23 | 1.00 | 0.23 | 0.91 | 0.411 2 |
B | 33.80 | 1.00 | 33.80 | 133.49 | 0.001 4 |
C | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 0.80 | 0.436 8 |
D | 1.08 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 4.27 | 0.130 8 |
E | 10.45 | 1.00 | 10.45 | 41.28 | 0.007 6 |
F | 1.07 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 4.22 | 0.132 3 |
G | 1.13 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 4.46 | 0.125 2 |
H | 0.07 | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.29 | 0.627 2 |
序号Number | B | E | R |
---|---|---|---|
1 | -1 | -1 | 26.45 |
2 | 1 | -1 | 28.73 |
3 | -1 | 1 | 26.05 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 26.62 |
5 | -1.414 | 0 | 26.56 |
6 | 1.414 | 0 | 28.48 |
7 | 0 | -1.414 | 28.62 |
8 | 0 | 1.414 | 26.36 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 26.02 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 25.23 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 26.56 |
12 | 0 | 0 | 25.65 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 26.46 |
Table 5 Scheme and result of CCD test
序号Number | B | E | R |
---|---|---|---|
1 | -1 | -1 | 26.45 |
2 | 1 | -1 | 28.73 |
3 | -1 | 1 | 26.05 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 26.62 |
5 | -1.414 | 0 | 26.56 |
6 | 1.414 | 0 | 28.48 |
7 | 0 | -1.414 | 28.62 |
8 | 0 | 1.414 | 26.36 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 26.02 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 25.23 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 26.56 |
12 | 0 | 0 | 25.65 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 26.46 |
方差来源 Variance sources | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 13.48 | 5 | 2.70 | 9.99 | 0.043 0 |
B | 3.87 | 1 | 3.87 | 14.34 | 0.006 8 |
E | 4.07 | 1 | 4.07 | 15.08 | 0.006 0 |
BE | 0.73 | 1 | 0.73 | 2.71 | 0.143 8 |
B2 | 2.78 | 1 | 2.78 | 10.31 | 0.014 9 |
E2 | 2.65 | 1 | 2.65 | 9.82 | 0.016 5 |
残差 Residual | 1.89 | 7 | 0.27 | ||
失拟 Lack of fit | 0.65 | 3 | 0.22 | 0.70 | 0.599 0 |
误差 Error | 1.24 | 4 | 0.31 | ||
总和 Sum | 15.37 | 12 |
Table 6 Sariance analysis of CCD test
方差来源 Variance sources | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 13.48 | 5 | 2.70 | 9.99 | 0.043 0 |
B | 3.87 | 1 | 3.87 | 14.34 | 0.006 8 |
E | 4.07 | 1 | 4.07 | 15.08 | 0.006 0 |
BE | 0.73 | 1 | 0.73 | 2.71 | 0.143 8 |
B2 | 2.78 | 1 | 2.78 | 10.31 | 0.014 9 |
E2 | 2.65 | 1 | 2.65 | 9.82 | 0.016 5 |
残差 Residual | 1.89 | 7 | 0.27 | ||
失拟 Lack of fit | 0.65 | 3 | 0.22 | 0.70 | 0.599 0 |
误差 Error | 1.24 | 4 | 0.31 | ||
总和 Sum | 15.37 | 12 |
试验次序 Sequence | 仿真堆积角 Stacking angle of simulation /(°) | 相对误差 Relative error/% |
---|---|---|
1 | 27.122 | 0.98 |
2 | 26.554 | 1.14 |
3 | 26.682 | 0.66 |
4 | 27.234 | 1.40 |
5 | 26.386 | 1.76 |
Table 7 Analysis of simulation test
试验次序 Sequence | 仿真堆积角 Stacking angle of simulation /(°) | 相对误差 Relative error/% |
---|---|---|
1 | 27.122 | 0.98 |
2 | 26.554 | 1.14 |
3 | 26.682 | 0.66 |
4 | 27.234 | 1.40 |
5 | 26.386 | 1.76 |
1 | 祝捍敏.我国大蒜出口贸易与国际竞争力评价分析[J].中国瓜菜,2022,35(10):111-116. |
ZHU H M. Evaluation and analysis on China’s garlic export trade and international competitiveness [J]. China Cucurbits Veg., 2022,35(10):111-116. | |
2 | 魏宏玲,王小瑜,陈进熹,等.中国大蒜机械化生产现状与发展思路探讨[J].中国农机化学报,2022,43(4):175-182. |
WEI H L, WANG X Y, CHEN J X, et al.. Discussion on the present situation and development of mechanized garlic production in China [J]. J. Chin. Agric. Mech., 2022,43(4):175-182. | |
3 | 张涛,刘飞,赵满全,等.大豆种子与排种器接触物理参数的测定与离散元仿真标定[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(9):86-92. |
ZHANG T, LIU F, ZHAO M Q, et al.. Measurement of physical parameters of contact between soybean seed and seed metering device and discrete element simulation calibration [J]. J. China Agric. Univ., 2017,22(9):86-92. | |
4 | 侯占峰,戴念祖,陈智,等.冰草种子物性参数测定与离散元仿真参数标定[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(24):46-54. |
HOU Z F, DAI N Z, CHEN Z, et al.. Measurement and calibration of physical property parameters for agropyron seeds in a discrete element simulation [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2020,36(24):46-54. | |
5 | 张荣芳,焦伟,周纪磊,等.不同填充颗粒半径水稻种子离散元模型参数标定[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(S1):227-235. |
ZHANG R F, JIAO W, ZHOU J L, et al.. Parameter calibration and experiment of rice seeds discrete element model with different filling particle radius [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2020,51(S1):227-235. | |
6 | 马文鹏,尤泳,王德成,等.基于RSM和NSGA-Ⅱ的苜蓿种子离散元模型参数标定[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(8):136-144. |
MA W P, YOU Y, WANG D C, et al.. Parameter calibration of alfalfa seed discrete element model basedon RSM and NSGA-II [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2020,51(8):136-144. | |
7 | 吴佳胜,曹成茂,谢承健,等.前胡种子物性参数测定及其离散元仿真模型参数标定[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2019,54(4):180-189. |
WU J S, CAO C M, XIE C J, et al.. Measurement of physical parameters of Radix peucedani seeds and parameter calibration of discrete element simulation model [J]. J. Gansu Agric. Univ., 2019,54(4):180-189. | |
8 | 郝建军,魏文波,黄鹏程,等.油葵籽粒离散元参数标定与试验验证[J].农业工程学报, 2021,37(12):36-44. |
HAO J J, WEI W B, HUANG P C, et al.. Calibration and experimental verification of discrete element parameters of oil sunflower seeds [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2021,37(12):36-44. | |
9 | 张胜伟,张瑞雨,陈天佑,等.绿豆种子离散元仿真参数标定与排种试验[J].农业机械学报,2022,53(3):71-79. |
ZHANG S W, ZHANG R Y, GHEN T Y, et al.. Calibration of simulation parameters of mung bean seeds using discrete element method and verification of seed-metering test [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2022,53(3):71-79. | |
10 | JIA H, DENG J, DENG Y, et al.. Contact parameter analysis and calibration in discrete element simulation of rice straw [J]. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2021,14(4):72-81. |
11 | LI H, ZHANG G, LI X, et al.. Calibration of the discrete element method parameters in living juvenile manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) and seeding verification [J]. AgriEngineering, 2021,3(4):894-906. |
12 | 吴孟宸,丛锦玲,闫琴,等.花生种子颗粒离散元仿真参数标定与试验[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(23):30-38. |
WU M C, CONG J L, YAN Q, et al.. Calibration and experiments for discrete element simulation parameters of peanut seed particles [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2020,36(23):30-38. | |
13 | 霍星辰,宋卫东,王明友,等.双孢菇麦粒菌种离散元分析参数试验研究及仿真标定[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(18):271-276. |
14 | 顿国强,于春玲,杨永振,等.大豆育种排种盘型孔参数仿真优化与试验[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(19):62-73. |
DUN G Q, YU C L, YANG Y Z, et al.. Parameter simulation optimization and experiment of seed plate type hole for soybean breeding [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2019,35(19):62-73. | |
15 | 范旭阳,杨正华,代典,等.磷矿酸浸脱镁提磷过程的响应曲面分析[J].磷肥与复肥,2021,36(8):5-8, 52. |
FAN X Y, YANG Z H, DAI D, et al.. Analysis of magnesium removal and phosphorus improvement of phosphate rock with hydrochloric acid leaching by response surface methodology [J]. Phosphate Compd. Fert., 2021,36(8):5-8, 52. | |
16 | BACHERIKOV I V, NOVIKOV A I, PETRISHCHEV E P. Discrete seed feeder designing for mobile apparatus: early results for Pinus sylvestris Ⅰ. species [J]. Inventions, 2021,6(1):14. |
17 | 顿国强,刘文辉,毛宁,等.交替换岗式大豆小区育种排种器优化设计与试验[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2023,53(1):285-296. |
DUN G Q, LIU W H, MAO N, et al.. Optimization design and experiment of alternate post changing seed metering device for soybean plot breeding [J]. J. Jilin Univ. (Eng. Technol.), 2023,53(1):285-296. | |
18 | GUO H, CAO Y, SONG W, et al.. Design and simulation of a garlic seed metering mechanism [J]. Agriculture, 2021,11(12):12-39. |
19 | 顿国强,于春玲,郭艳玲,等,双齿轮式排肥器设计与试验 [J].农业机械学报,2020,51(3):87-96. |
DUN G Q, YU C L, GUO Y L, et al.. Design and experiment of Double-gear type fertilizer apparatus [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2020,51(3):87-96. |
[1] | Guoqiang DUN, Xingpeng WU, Xinxin JI, Fuli ZHANG, Wenyi JI, Yongzhen YANG. Simulation and Optimization of Soybean Plot Metering Device with Double Swing Plate [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 82-90. |
[2] | Ming LI, Shuai DONG, Yongqiang PANG, Jiehua YAN, Wangzhong YE. Design Improvement and Test of Aeolian Sand Mixing Cutter [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 87-96. |
[3] | Yuanhao HUANG, Lazhen QUAN, Guangfa HU, Wei QUAN, Fanggang SHI. Calibration of Discrete Element Contact Parameters for Various Materials and Soils with Different Moisture Content [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 98-109. |
[4] | Lin CHEN, Nanhui YU, Lizong WANG, Jijun FAN, Gang LEI, Xiaopeng LIU, Long ZHOU, Jin ZHOU. Measurement of Contact Parameters and Discrete Element Simulation Calibration of Rice Bran and Broken Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 127-136. |
[5] | Hongbo WANG, Zhipeng FAN, Wulantuya, Chunguang WANG, Zhe MA. Parameter Calibration of Discrete Element Model for Simulation of Crushed Corn Stalk Screw Conveying [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 96-106. |
[6] | Miao YU, Haibin ZHOU, Jingtao DING, Hongsheng CHENG, Yujun SHEN, Shengyuan FAN, Xi ZHANG, Jian WANG, Pengxiang XU, Qiongyi CHENG. Calibration of Interparticle Contact Parameters of Kitchen Waste Composition Based on EDEM [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 111-120. |
[7] | Zitao MA, Zhihao ZHAO, Wei QUAN, Fanggang SHI, Chen GAO, Mingliang WU. Calibration of Discrete Element Parameter of Rice Stubble Straw Based on EDEM [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(11): 103-113. |
[8] | Fake SHAN, Shuo KANG, Jianxi ZHU, Yongwei WANG, Jun WANG. Study on Tillage Fertilizer Mixing Effect Under Vertical Smashing Rotary Tillage and Rotary Tillage Based on EDEM [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(11): 90-102. |
[9] | Ting ZHOU, Songlin SUN, Haiying ZHU, Caiwang PENG. Effect of Moisture Content on Bond Flows of Black Soldier Fly Larvae Biotransformation Pig Manure Organic Fertilizer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 126-136. |
[10] | Feixiang LI, Peng WANG, Yunfei WANG, Yuefeng GE, Kaiyi TANG, Dezhi LI. Calibration of Discrete Element Parameters of Corn Coated Seeds Based on Stacking Test [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 97-107. |
[11] | Shisheng SONG, Songlin SUN, Qin FANG, Caiwang PENG, Ting ZHOU, Haiying ZHU. Parameters Calibration of Discrete Element for Kitchen Waste Organic Fertilizer Bioconversion by Black Soldier Fly [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 123-132. |
[12] | Jianwei YAN, Song WEI, Dongjun HU, Qihe LIU, Fuigui ZHANG. Parameter Calibration of Radish Seeds with Different Filling Particle Radius by DEM [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 119-128. |
[13] | Guichuan YANG, Fugui ZHANG, Le ZHENG, Zhen WANG, Manman KONG, Xinpeng ZHANG. Tuber Physical Characteristics and Calibration of Discrete Element Simulation Parameters of Pinellia ternata [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(10): 99-108. |
[14] | QUAN Wei, WU Mingliang, GUAN Chunyun, LUO Haifeng. Experimental Study on the Shape Optimization of Soil Opener for Rapeseed Pot Seedling Transplanter [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 97-106. |
[15] | XIANG Wei1,2, WU Mingliang1*, LYU Jiangnan2, MA Lan2, QUAN Wei1, LIU Jiajie2, XIAO Le3. Simulation and Experiment on Hole-forming Performance of Hole-forming Mechanism for Rape Seedling Transplanting Based on EDEM [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 70-81. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||