Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 158-169.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0429
• FOOD QUALITY & PROCESSING AND STORAGE • Previous Articles
Ruyue WANG1,2(), Haifang HU2,3, Shasha LUO1,2, Ziyi ZHEN1,2, Yeyong XU3, Xiaojing HU1(
)
Received:
2023-06-03
Accepted:
2024-04-22
Online:
2025-02-15
Published:
2025-02-14
Contact:
Xiaojing HU
王如月1,2(), 虎海防2,3, 罗莎莎1,2, 甄紫怡1,2, 徐业勇3, 胡晓静1(
)
通讯作者:
胡晓静
作者简介:
王如月 E-mail:1547093665@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Ruyue WANG, Haifang HU, Shasha LUO, Ziyi ZHEN, Yeyong XU, Xiaojing HU. Fruit Quality Analysis of Prunus domestica × armeniaca at Different Harvest Maturity Levels[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 158-169.
王如月, 虎海防, 罗莎莎, 甄紫怡, 徐业勇, 胡晓静. 杏李不同采收成熟度果实品质分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 158-169.
综合评分 Comprehensive score | 转色率 Color conversion rate | 多汁性 Juiciness | 甜度 Sweetness | 酸度 Acidity | 软硬度 Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0~3.9 | 绿色 Green | 不多 Not much | 无甜味 No sweet taste | 非常酸 Very sour | 很硬 Very hard |
4.0~7.9 | 3/4绿色 3/4 green | 有点多 A little much | 微甜 Slightly sweet | 很酸 Too sour | 硬 Hard |
8.0~11.9 | 2/3绿色 2/3 green | 较多 More | 较甜 Sweeter | 较酸 More sour | 较硬 More hard |
12.0~15.9 | 1/4绿色 1/4 green | 很多 Quite a lot | 很甜 Too sweet | 微酸或无酸 Slightly acid or no acid | 微硬 Microhardness |
16.0~20.0 | 绿色消失 Green disappears | 丰富 Abundant | 非常甜 Very sweet | 酸甜适宜 Sweet and sour | 非常软 Very soft |
Table 1 Comprehensive score of sensory indexes
综合评分 Comprehensive score | 转色率 Color conversion rate | 多汁性 Juiciness | 甜度 Sweetness | 酸度 Acidity | 软硬度 Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0~3.9 | 绿色 Green | 不多 Not much | 无甜味 No sweet taste | 非常酸 Very sour | 很硬 Very hard |
4.0~7.9 | 3/4绿色 3/4 green | 有点多 A little much | 微甜 Slightly sweet | 很酸 Too sour | 硬 Hard |
8.0~11.9 | 2/3绿色 2/3 green | 较多 More | 较甜 Sweeter | 较酸 More sour | 较硬 More hard |
12.0~15.9 | 1/4绿色 1/4 green | 很多 Quite a lot | 很甜 Too sweet | 微酸或无酸 Slightly acid or no acid | 微硬 Microhardness |
16.0~20.0 | 绿色消失 Green disappears | 丰富 Abundant | 非常甜 Very sweet | 酸甜适宜 Sweet and sour | 非常软 Very soft |
Fig. 1 Single fruit weight of fruits with different harvest maturity levelsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different maturity levels at P<0.05 level.
成熟度 Maturity level | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a/(μg·cm-3) | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b/(μg·cm-3) | 叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a/b | 叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a+b/(μg·cm-3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 21.390±1.121 a | 23.040±1.520 a | 0.930±0.020 a | 44.430±2.630 a |
Ⅱ | 13.750±0.952 b | 21.720±0.350 ab | 0.650±0.030 a | 35.460±1.080 b |
Ⅲ | 12.350±0.408 bc | 19.390±2.730 abc | 0.650±0.070 a | 31.730±2.880 bc |
Ⅳ | 11.620±0.289 c | 17.890±0.770 bc | 0.650±0.030 a | 29.520±0.935 c |
Ⅴ | 11.500±0.817 c | 15.700±2.870 c | 0.890±0.380 a | 27..200±3.190 c |
Table 2 Chlorophyll content in fruit peel under different harvesting maturity levels
成熟度 Maturity level | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a/(μg·cm-3) | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b/(μg·cm-3) | 叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a/b | 叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a+b/(μg·cm-3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 21.390±1.121 a | 23.040±1.520 a | 0.930±0.020 a | 44.430±2.630 a |
Ⅱ | 13.750±0.952 b | 21.720±0.350 ab | 0.650±0.030 a | 35.460±1.080 b |
Ⅲ | 12.350±0.408 bc | 19.390±2.730 abc | 0.650±0.070 a | 31.730±2.880 bc |
Ⅳ | 11.620±0.289 c | 17.890±0.770 bc | 0.650±0.030 a | 29.520±0.935 c |
Ⅴ | 11.500±0.817 c | 15.700±2.870 c | 0.890±0.380 a | 27..200±3.190 c |
指标 Index | 成熟度 Maturity level | L*:亮度值 Brightness value | a*:红绿值 Red green value | b*:黄蓝值 Yellow blue value | a*/b*:综合比值 Comprehensive ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
果皮颜色 Skin color | Ⅰ | 61.618±1.162 a | -9.030±1.397 d | 11.923±0.559 c | -0.778±0.111 d |
Ⅱ | 59.055±1.351 ab | -5.388±2.791 c | 32.589±2.380 ab | -0.170±0.099 c | |
Ⅲ | 57.050±2.883 b | -2.738±1.980 bc | 30.132±1.021 b | -0.090±0.066 bc | |
Ⅳ | 54.313±0.823 c | -0.996±1.090 b | 33.211±1.525 a | -0.029±0.029 b | |
Ⅴ | 50.158±2.210 d | 6.781±0.744 a | 34.932±1.233 a | 0.195±0.023 a | |
果肉颜色 Fruit flesh color | Ⅰ | 56.497±0.494 a | -5.553±1.360 e | 22.049±2.583 c | -0.286±0.104 d |
Ⅱ | 55.602±1.147 a | -2.042±1.416 d | 29.270±1.392 b | -0.070±0.049 c | |
Ⅲ | 51.789±0.613 b | 2.553±1.344 c | 31.927±2.007 b | 0.082±0.044 b | |
Ⅳ | 50.391±0.131 b | 6.781±0.997 b | 31.598±1.186 b | 0.214±0.023 a | |
Ⅴ | 43.005±1.638 c | 10.207±1.179 a | 37.429±1.822 a | 0.272±0.021 a |
Table 3 Color and chromaticity values of peel and flesh of fruits with different harvest maturity levels
指标 Index | 成熟度 Maturity level | L*:亮度值 Brightness value | a*:红绿值 Red green value | b*:黄蓝值 Yellow blue value | a*/b*:综合比值 Comprehensive ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
果皮颜色 Skin color | Ⅰ | 61.618±1.162 a | -9.030±1.397 d | 11.923±0.559 c | -0.778±0.111 d |
Ⅱ | 59.055±1.351 ab | -5.388±2.791 c | 32.589±2.380 ab | -0.170±0.099 c | |
Ⅲ | 57.050±2.883 b | -2.738±1.980 bc | 30.132±1.021 b | -0.090±0.066 bc | |
Ⅳ | 54.313±0.823 c | -0.996±1.090 b | 33.211±1.525 a | -0.029±0.029 b | |
Ⅴ | 50.158±2.210 d | 6.781±0.744 a | 34.932±1.233 a | 0.195±0.023 a | |
果肉颜色 Fruit flesh color | Ⅰ | 56.497±0.494 a | -5.553±1.360 e | 22.049±2.583 c | -0.286±0.104 d |
Ⅱ | 55.602±1.147 a | -2.042±1.416 d | 29.270±1.392 b | -0.070±0.049 c | |
Ⅲ | 51.789±0.613 b | 2.553±1.344 c | 31.927±2.007 b | 0.082±0.044 b | |
Ⅳ | 50.391±0.131 b | 6.781±0.997 b | 31.598±1.186 b | 0.214±0.023 a | |
Ⅴ | 43.005±1.638 c | 10.207±1.179 a | 37.429±1.822 a | 0.272±0.021 a |
Fig. 2 Fruit peel hardness and peel removal hardness of fruits with different harvest maturity levelsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different maturity levels at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Vitamin C, soluble solids, titratable acids and solid acid ratio of fruits with different harvest maturity levelsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different maturity levels at P<0.05 level.
成熟度 Maturity level | 纤维素 Cellulose | 总糖 Total sugar | 质膜透性 Plasma membrane permeability | 原果胶 Protopectin | 可溶性果胶 Soluble pectin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 0.560±0.181 a | 15.260±0.630 b | 35.180±3.980 c | 0.780±0.350 a | 0.190±0.080 b |
Ⅱ | 0.383±0.124 b | 16.710±2.190 ab | 41.170±12.240 bc | 0.570±0.600 a | 0.340±0.110 ab |
Ⅲ | 0.133±0.021 c | 17.240±0.650 ab | 51.870±3.900 ab | 0.440±0.040 a | 0.350±0.120 ab |
Ⅳ | 0.127±0.049 c | 20.680±7.460 ab | 57.420±6.960 a | 0.440±0.220 a | 0.530±0.210 a |
Ⅴ | 0.140±0.029 c | 23.700±3.520 a | 62.050±0.480 a | 0.430±0.120 a | 0.410±0.160 ab |
Table 4 Cellulose, total sugar, plasma membrane permeability and pectin content of fruits with different harvest maturities (%)
成熟度 Maturity level | 纤维素 Cellulose | 总糖 Total sugar | 质膜透性 Plasma membrane permeability | 原果胶 Protopectin | 可溶性果胶 Soluble pectin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 0.560±0.181 a | 15.260±0.630 b | 35.180±3.980 c | 0.780±0.350 a | 0.190±0.080 b |
Ⅱ | 0.383±0.124 b | 16.710±2.190 ab | 41.170±12.240 bc | 0.570±0.600 a | 0.340±0.110 ab |
Ⅲ | 0.133±0.021 c | 17.240±0.650 ab | 51.870±3.900 ab | 0.440±0.040 a | 0.350±0.120 ab |
Ⅳ | 0.127±0.049 c | 20.680±7.460 ab | 57.420±6.960 a | 0.440±0.220 a | 0.530±0.210 a |
Ⅴ | 0.140±0.029 c | 23.700±3.520 a | 62.050±0.480 a | 0.430±0.120 a | 0.410±0.160 ab |
成熟度 Maturity level | 转色率 Color conversion rate | 多汁性 Juiciness | 甜度 Sweetness | 酸度 Acidity | 软硬度 Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 2.070±0.750 e | 2.830±0.870 d | 1.270±0.960 e | 0.970±0.570 e | 1.100±0.300 e |
Ⅱ | 5.470±0.930 d | 5.030±1.450 d | 4.670±0.550 d | 6.200±1.420 d | 5.300±0.950 d |
Ⅲ | 9.130±1.430 c | 10.130±1.590 c | 9.700±1.510 c | 9.300±1.250 c | 10.330±1.310 c |
Ⅳ | 12.870±1.340 b | 18.500±1.350 a | 14.000±1.510 b | 14.330±1.600 b | 15.100±0.660 b |
Ⅴ | 18.340±1.900 a | 14.400±1.610 b | 18.230±1.890 a | 18.600±1.440 a | 19.500±0.700 a |
Table 5 Scores of sensory indicators of fruits with different harvest maturity levels
成熟度 Maturity level | 转色率 Color conversion rate | 多汁性 Juiciness | 甜度 Sweetness | 酸度 Acidity | 软硬度 Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 2.070±0.750 e | 2.830±0.870 d | 1.270±0.960 e | 0.970±0.570 e | 1.100±0.300 e |
Ⅱ | 5.470±0.930 d | 5.030±1.450 d | 4.670±0.550 d | 6.200±1.420 d | 5.300±0.950 d |
Ⅲ | 9.130±1.430 c | 10.130±1.590 c | 9.700±1.510 c | 9.300±1.250 c | 10.330±1.310 c |
Ⅳ | 12.870±1.340 b | 18.500±1.350 a | 14.000±1.510 b | 14.330±1.600 b | 15.100±0.660 b |
Ⅴ | 18.340±1.900 a | 14.400±1.610 b | 18.230±1.890 a | 18.600±1.440 a | 19.500±0.700 a |
Fig. 4 Correlation heat map of each quality index under different maturityNote:Red in the figure represents positive correlation, blue represents negative correlation. * and ** indicate significant correlations at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels,respectively.
性状Trait | 主成分Principal component | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
带皮硬度 Skin hardness | -0.97 | -0.01 | 0.11 |
去皮硬度 Peeling hardness | -0.97 | 0.13 | 0.01 |
单果重 Single fruit weight | 0.96 | -0.03 | -0.10 |
维生素 Vc | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
纤维素 Cellulose | -0.81 | 0.22 | 0.15 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.91 | 0.39 | -0.02 |
可滴定酸 Titratable acids | -0.93 | 0.20 | 0.14 |
固酸比 Solid acid ratio | 0.83 | 0.13 | -0.38 |
总糖 Total sugar | 0.71 | 0.37 | 0.47 |
质膜透性 Plasma membrane permeability | 0.89 | -0.02 | -0.20 |
原果胶 Protopectin | -0.48 | 0.26 | -0.39 |
可溶性果胶 Soluble pectin | 0.61 | -0.12 | 0.71 |
叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | -0.89 | 0.38 | -0.05 |
叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | -0.88 | -0.29 | -0.02 |
叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a/b | -0.13 | 0.92 | 0.16 |
叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a+b | -0.95 | 0.09 | -0.04 |
果皮L* Peel L* | -0.91 | -0.25 | -0.01 |
果皮a* Peel a* | 0.92 | 0.23 | -0.02 |
果皮b* Peel b* | 0.84 | -0.37 | 0.12 |
果皮a/b* Peel a/b* | 0.94 | -0.19 | 0.06 |
果肉L* Fruit pulp L* | -0.90 | -0.31 | 0.19 |
果肉a* Fruit pulp a* | 0.97 | 0.12 | -0.05 |
果肉b* Fruit pulp b* | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
果肉a/b* Fruit pulp a/b* | 0.97 | -0.06 | -0.04 |
初始特征值 Initial eigenvalue | 17.83 | 1.98 | 1.22 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 74.28 | 8.25 | 5.07 |
累计贡献率 Accumulated contribution rate/% | 74.28 | 82.53 | 87.60 |
Table 6 Factor score, initial eigenvalue and variance contribution rate
性状Trait | 主成分Principal component | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
带皮硬度 Skin hardness | -0.97 | -0.01 | 0.11 |
去皮硬度 Peeling hardness | -0.97 | 0.13 | 0.01 |
单果重 Single fruit weight | 0.96 | -0.03 | -0.10 |
维生素 Vc | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
纤维素 Cellulose | -0.81 | 0.22 | 0.15 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.91 | 0.39 | -0.02 |
可滴定酸 Titratable acids | -0.93 | 0.20 | 0.14 |
固酸比 Solid acid ratio | 0.83 | 0.13 | -0.38 |
总糖 Total sugar | 0.71 | 0.37 | 0.47 |
质膜透性 Plasma membrane permeability | 0.89 | -0.02 | -0.20 |
原果胶 Protopectin | -0.48 | 0.26 | -0.39 |
可溶性果胶 Soluble pectin | 0.61 | -0.12 | 0.71 |
叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | -0.89 | 0.38 | -0.05 |
叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | -0.88 | -0.29 | -0.02 |
叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a/b | -0.13 | 0.92 | 0.16 |
叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a+b | -0.95 | 0.09 | -0.04 |
果皮L* Peel L* | -0.91 | -0.25 | -0.01 |
果皮a* Peel a* | 0.92 | 0.23 | -0.02 |
果皮b* Peel b* | 0.84 | -0.37 | 0.12 |
果皮a/b* Peel a/b* | 0.94 | -0.19 | 0.06 |
果肉L* Fruit pulp L* | -0.90 | -0.31 | 0.19 |
果肉a* Fruit pulp a* | 0.97 | 0.12 | -0.05 |
果肉b* Fruit pulp b* | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
果肉a/b* Fruit pulp a/b* | 0.97 | -0.06 | -0.04 |
初始特征值 Initial eigenvalue | 17.83 | 1.98 | 1.22 |
贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 74.28 | 8.25 | 5.07 |
累计贡献率 Accumulated contribution rate/% | 74.28 | 82.53 | 87.60 |
成熟度 Maturity level | 主成分Principal component | 综合得分Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Ⅰ | -6.530 | 1.350 | -0.270 | -4.750 | 5 |
Ⅱ | -2.120 | -1.240 | 0.380 | -1.660 | 4 |
Ⅲ | 0.430 | -1.020 | -0.210 | 0.220 | 3 |
Ⅳ | 2.780 | -0.640 | 0.480 | 2.030 | 2 |
Ⅴ | 5.450 | 1.550 | -0.380 | 4.160 | 1 |
Table 7 Comprehensive score and ranking of different maturity levels
成熟度 Maturity level | 主成分Principal component | 综合得分Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Ⅰ | -6.530 | 1.350 | -0.270 | -4.750 | 5 |
Ⅱ | -2.120 | -1.240 | 0.380 | -1.660 | 4 |
Ⅲ | 0.430 | -1.020 | -0.210 | 0.220 | 3 |
Ⅳ | 2.780 | -0.640 | 0.480 | 2.030 | 2 |
Ⅴ | 5.450 | 1.550 | -0.380 | 4.160 | 1 |
1 | 杨绍彬,李芳东,杜红岩,等.杏李种间杂交品种适宜授粉组合筛选试验[J].中国果树,2008(5):28-30. |
2 | 王春弘,朱凤云.杂交杏李高效栽植及授粉技术研究[J].广东农业科学,2011,38(19):50-51. |
3 | 杨飞,韦茜,刘朝英,等.美国杏李种植管理技术[J].中国园艺文摘,2011,27(3):155-156. |
4 | MACHADO F L D C, COSTA J M C D, TEIXEIRA A D S, et al.. The influence of rootstock and time of harvest on the fruit quality during storage of in two grapefruit cultivars [J]. Acta Sci. Agron., 2015, 37(3): 339-346. |
5 | PAILLY O, TISON G, AMOUROUX A. Harvest time and storage conditions of ‘Star Ruby’ grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) for short distance summer consumption [J]. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 2004,34(1):65-73. |
6 | UNDURRAGA P L, OLARTA J A, RETAMALES J B, et al.. Effect of maturity and storage temperature on the development of peteca in lemons [Citrus limon (L.) Burm. F.] cv. Eureka [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2009, 122(1): 56-61. |
7 | 张志刚,刘玉芳,李长城,等.不同成熟度对杏果实品质的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2021,33(8):1402-1408. |
ZHANG Z G, LIU Y F, LI C C, et al.. Effect of different maturity on fruit quality of apricot [J].Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2021,33(8):1402-1408. | |
8 | 侯晓健,张浩宇,张光弟,等.不同成熟度红梅杏品质及挥发性物质研究[J].食品与发酵工业,2022,48(10):177-182. |
HOU X J, ZHANG H Y, ZHANG G D, et al.. Study on the quality and volatile compounds of Hongmei apricot with different maturity [J]. Food Ferment. Ind., 2022,48(10):177-182. | |
9 | 薛晓敏,韩雪平,王贵平,等.不同成熟度对李果实品质的影响[J].经济林研究,2020,38(3):26-36. |
XUE X M, HAN X P, WANG G P, et al.. Effects of different maturities on characteristics of plum fruit quality [J].Non-Wood For. Res., 2020,38(3):26-36. | |
10 | 杜改改,李泰山,刁松锋,等.6个杏李品种果实甜酸风味品质分析[J].果树学报,2017,34(1):41-49. |
DU G G, LI T S, DIAO S F, et al.. Evaluation of flavor quality in relation to sugars and acids of six Prunus domestica × armeniaca cultivars [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2017,34(1):41-49. | |
11 | 李泰山.负载量对杏李‘味帝’产量及果实品质的影响[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2024. |
LI T S. Yield, sensory profile, and physico-chemical quality attributes of Prunus domestica×armeniaca ‘Weidi Fruits’ as affected by crop load [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2024. | |
12 | 王如月,罗莎莎,甄紫怡,等.风味皇后杏李果实不同成熟度特性研究[J].浙江农业学报,2023,35(12):2865-2877. |
WANG R Y, LUO S S, ZHEN Z Y, et al.. Study on the characteristics of different maturity of apricot plum Flavor Queen fruit [J]. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2023,35(12):2865-2877. | |
13 | 刘彬,张云秀,李芳,等.新疆野苹果果实Vc及可溶性蛋白含量的测定分析[J].天津农学院学报,2016,23(4):14-17. |
LIU B, ZHANG Y X, LI F, et al.. Measurement and comparison of vitamin C and soluble protein content of Malus sieversii fruits [J]. J. Tianjin Agric. Univ., 2016,23(4):14-17. | |
14 | 王明霞,孙中平,于唐丽,等.不同种类及相同种类不同品种蔬菜的粗纤维含量分析[J].科技资讯,2018,16(13):212-213. |
15 | 李清斌,孙军波,符国槐,等.新旧膜棚内小气候差异及其对樱桃番茄果实产量和品质的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2016,28(3):435-440. |
LI Q B, SUN J B, FU G H,et al..Effects of different microclimatic factors in greenhouse with new greenhouse film or old one on yield and quality of cherry tomato [J]. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2016,28(3):435-440. | |
16 | 张宪政.植物生理学实验技术[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1989: 158-159 . |
17 | 刁俊明,曾宪录,朱远平,等.脐橙果实大小对果实感官品质和可溶性固形物含量的影响[J].广东农业科学,2015,42(23):82-85. |
DIAO J M, ZENG X L, ZHU Y P, et al.. Effects of fruit size on sensory quality and soluble solid content of Citrus sinensis [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2015,42(23):82-85. | |
18 | 刘雪峰,胡德玉,袁项成,等.海拔和采收期对奥林达夏橙果实品质的影响[J].南方农业,2017,11(4):52-55. |
19 | 马培恰,吴文,王平,等.贡柑采收期果肉颜色变化与果实成熟度的关系研究[J].广东农业科学,2010,37(10):63-64. |
MA P Q, WU W, WANG P, et al.. Relationship between the color change of Citrus Gonggan flesh and the maturity in harvest time [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2010,37(10):63-64. | |
20 | 梁森苗,朱婷婷,张淑文,等.杨梅果实发育成熟度与颜色变化规律探究[J].浙江农业科学,2019,60(6):879-882. |
21 | 张淑文,梁森苗,郑锡良,等.杨梅优株果实品质的主成分分析及综合评价[J].果树学报,2018,35(8):977-986. |
ZHANG S W, LIANG S M, ZHENG X L,et al..Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality in some advanced selections of Chinese bayberry [J]. J.Fruit Sci., 2018,35(8):977-986. | |
22 | LEWIS D H, BLOOR S J, SCHWINN K E.Flavonoid and carotenoid pigments in flower tissue of Sandersonia aurantiaca (Hook.) [J]. Sci. Hortic., 1998,72(3/4):179-192. |
23 | 高华君,王少敏,王江勇.套袋对苹果果皮花青苷合成及着色的影响[J].果树学报,2006,23(5):750-755. |
GAO H J, WANG S M, WANG J Y.Effect of bagging on anthocyanin biosynthesis and pigmentation in apple skin [J]. J.Fruit Sci., 2006,23(5):750-755. | |
24 | 李慧敏,郑洁新,曾凯芳,等.不同采收成熟度对蜜奈夏橙果实营养品质的影响[J].食品工业科技,2023,44(19):390-400. |
LI H M, ZHENG J X, ZENG K F,et al..Effect of different harvest maturity on the nutritional quality of midknight Valencia orange fruit [J]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2023,44(19):390-400. | |
25 | IGLESIAS D J, CERCÓS M, COLMENERO-FLORES J M, et al.. Physiology of citrus fruiting [J]. Brazilian J. Plant Physiol., 2007, 19: 333-362. |
26 | 张群,舒楠,张维,等.不同采收期黄桃的品质特性和微观结构变化[J].保鲜与加工,2021,21(4):29-34. |
ZHANG Q, SHU N, ZHANG W,et al..Changes of quality characteristics and microstructures of yellow peaches in different harvest periods [J]. Storage Process., 2021,21(4):29-34. | |
27 | 王贵平,王金政,薛晓敏.李新品种“金红” 不同采收期果实品质及香气成分分析[J].江西农业学报,2015,27(10):88-91. |
WANG G P, WANG J Z, XUE X M.Analysis of fruit quality and aromatic components of plum new variety “Jinhong” in different harvest times [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2015,27(10):88-91. | |
28 | 张文英.不同采收期和贮藏方式对金红苹果贮藏品质的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2007. |
ZHANG W Y. Effects of different harvest date and storage methods on the storage quality of golden-red apple during storage [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2007. | |
29 | 张丽娜,李梦琪,朱亮,等.不同采收期对烟台苹果果实品质影响研究[J].中国果菜,2017,37(6):16-24. |
ZHANG L N, LI M Q, ZHU L,et al..Effects of different harvest time on fruit quality of Yantai apple [J]. China Fruit Veget., 2017,37(6):16-24. | |
30 | 杨婷婷.不同采收成熟度对杏果品质劣变影响的研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2015. |
YANG T T. Study on the effect of quality deterioration on the apricot fruits with different harvest maturity [D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2024. | |
31 | INFANTE R, MENESES C, CRISOSTO C H. Preconditioning treatment maintains taste characteristic perception of ripe ‘September Sun’ peach following cold storage [J]. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2010,44(5):1011-1016. |
32 | 陈国刚,刘琦,任雷厉,等.库尔勒香梨锈斑形成过程中果皮木质素和纤维素含量的变化研究[J].食品工业科技,2011,32(3):356-359. |
CHEN G G, LIU Q, REN L L,et al..Study on the changes of the lignin and cellulose content of fruit peel during the formation of Kuerle pear rust [J]. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 2011,32(3):356-359. |
[1] | Ting WANG, Jinghan DU, Guangdi ZHANG, Jianglong WANG, Yinan JIA, Yu WANG, Wenyi BAO. Study on Quality and Volatile Substances of New Excellent Cabbage Varieties in Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 165-180. |
[2] | Xueqing WANG, Bo ZHANG, Liting HAN, Zhuanzhuan LYU, Jianjun CHEN, Zhulin ZHANG, Junqiang ZHANG, Jianmei DU. Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing on Volatile Compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 146-158. |
[3] | Xianyin SUN, Qiuhuan MU, Yong MI, Guangde LYU, Xiaolei QI, Yingying SUN, Xundong YIN, Ruixia WANG, Ke WU, Zhaoguo QIAN, Yan ZHAO, Minggang GAO. Classification and Evaluation of New Wheat Lines Based on GT Biplot [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 14-24. |
[4] | Dengyang LU, Panpan TONG, Min YAN, Jingkai BAO, Mingzhe LIU, Yilei XIA, Cuiyun WU. Identification and Evaluation of Korla Pear Bud Sport with Larger Fruit Size [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 52-64. |
[5] | Yutao SHI, Huizhen XIE, Shulin ZHENG, Guanhua YU, Feiquan WANG, Li LI, Bo ZHANG, Yuanhua LI, Shengcai LUO. Analysis of Biochemical Characteristics and Superoxide Anion Radical Scavenging Activity of Tea Polysaccharides of Local Tea Germplasms in Wuyishan [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 65-76. |
[6] | Yue PAN, Baoqing WANG, Jijiao WANG, Yong MA, Yalan LI. CO2 Response Model Fitting and Evaluation of Vitis amurensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 58-66. |
[7] | Tingting CAO, Chun LIU, Youwei FAN, Li MA, Zhiyu REN, Suxia YUAN, Junyun ZHANG, Zunyao QIAN, Guangzhao YANG. Effects of Different Nitrogen Supply Level on Plant Growth and Development in Miniature Potted Rose [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 67-79. |
[8] | Panpan MENG, Haiyan HE, Yuxin CAO, Lixin ZHANG, Qinghao LYU, Ruilin QI, Hongrui ZHANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of 5 Cultivation Types of Medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. at Branching Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 90-99. |
[9] | Zhaoyang YANG, Peng XU, Tiejian YUAN, Xiaoqiong LI, Donggen PENG, Zhentao ZHANG, Junling YANG, Chuangchuang DING, Jizhou ZHU. Study on Low Temperature Drying Characteristics and Quality of Hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(11): 157-170. |
[10] | Peng TIAN, Jie SONG, Xia LI, Yuzhi WANG, Bangbang WU. Analysis of Folate Content and Its Derivatives in Grains of Wheat with Different Grain Colors [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(11): 56-65. |
[11] | Shengmei LI, Bo PANG, Shiwei GENG, Wu SONG, Hongmei LI, Maosen MA, Ru ZHANG, Xinyan WANG, Wenwei GAO. Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Gossypium hirsutum L. × Gossypium barbadense L. Backross Populations in Full Boll Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 40-51. |
[12] | Shijian BAI, Jinge HU, Jiuyun WU, Wen ZHANG, Hui XIE, Ronghua ZHAO, Guang CHEN, Junshe CAI. Effects of Rootstocks on the Growth Characteristics and Fruit Quality of ‘Crimson Seedless’ Grapes in Turpan Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 76-87. |
[13] | Yingxue ZHU, Qi WANG, Xianfa MA, Yusheng JIAO, Jinxu GAO, Weijia MAO, Jia FU, Xuedong SUN, Ye YUAN. Leaf Color Characteristic Value and Nitrogen Diagnosis Model of Tobacco During Growth Period [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 54-62. |
[14] | Qianqian LU, Abuduwaili Abulimiti, Yixing HOU, Zhihui LI, Shuang WANG, Long ZHOU. Research of the Photosynthetic Characteristics of 7 Table Grape Varieties Under Compound Salt-alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 63-76. |
[15] | Shijiang ZHU, Hu LI, Wen XU, Yating FENG. Effects of Soil Moisture Content on Fruit Quality in Citrus Orchards Within Three Gorges Reservoir Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 201-207. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||