Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 205-217.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0890
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Juanjuan HUANG(), Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN(
)
Received:
2023-12-04
Accepted:
2024-02-04
Online:
2025-06-15
Published:
2025-06-23
Contact:
Baihong CHEN
通讯作者:
陈佰鸿
作者简介:
黄娟娟 E-mail:2645265817@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Juanjuan HUANG, Zhiqiang ZHANG, Juan MAO, Zonghuan MA, Baihong CHEN. Effects of Different Foliar Fertilizers on Growth, Development and Fruit Quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ Grape[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(6): 205-217.
黄娟娟, 张志强, 毛娟, 马宗桓, 陈佰鸿. 不同叶面肥对‘黑比诺’葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(6): 205-217.
Fig. 1 Leaf area of grape under different foliar fertilizersNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 2 Base thickness of grape shoot under different foliar fertilizersNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 SPAD value of grape leaves under different foliar fertilizersNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
元素 Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | ||
磷P | CK | 3.82±0.10 ab | 4.30±0.13 ab | 4.24±0.04 a | 4.04±0.34 ab | 3.67±0.14 c |
T1 | 4.17±0.07 a | 4.51±0.05 a | 4.28±0.13 a | 3.55±0.10 b | 4.16±0.05 ab | |
T2 | 3.89±0.15 ab | 4.25±0.11 ab | 3.87±0.09 b | 4.12±0.04 a | 4.15±0.02 ab | |
T3 | 3.52±0.23 b | 4.11±0.01 ab | 3.79±0.14 b | 3.63±0.05 ab | 3.92±0.03 b | |
T4 | 4.27±0.14 a | 4.47±0.07 a | 3.89±0.04 b | 3.83±0.02 ab | 4.10±0.07 ab | |
T5 | 3.93±0.10 ab | 4.49±0.13 a | 4.29±0.05 a | 3.52±0.06 b | 4.33±0.07 a | |
T6 | 3.93±0.17 ab | 4.05±0.18 b | 4.23±0.06 a | 3.83±0.12 ab | 3.68±0.06 c | |
钾K | CK | 8.69±0.63 c | 11.11±0.39 a | 8.54±0.20 c | 10.38±0.20 a | 6.67±0.41 a |
T1 | 10.20±0.14 a | 10.56±0.15 a | 10.43±0.79 b | 11.57±0.39 a | 6.94±0.29 a | |
T2 | 8.37±0.22 bc | 12.57±0.12 a | 10.09±0.16 b | 10.44±0.14 a | 7.22±0.14 a | |
T3 | 7.69±0.31 bc | 10.46±0.38 a | 8.68±0.22 c | 6.95±0.52 b | 6.31±0.46 a | |
T4 | 9.61±0.30 bc | 11.59±0.28 a | 9.83±0.20 b | 7.26±0.17 b | 7.12±0.86 a | |
T5 | 9.39±0.38 b | 10.95±0.50 a | 10.46±0.34 b | 11.20±0.78 a | 6.52±0.25 a | |
T6 | 9.98±0.48 a | 13.43±0.16 a | 12.15±0.51 a | 6.97±0.30 b | 6.41±0.39 a |
Table 1 Content of major elements in grape leaves under different leaf fertilizers
元素 Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | ||
磷P | CK | 3.82±0.10 ab | 4.30±0.13 ab | 4.24±0.04 a | 4.04±0.34 ab | 3.67±0.14 c |
T1 | 4.17±0.07 a | 4.51±0.05 a | 4.28±0.13 a | 3.55±0.10 b | 4.16±0.05 ab | |
T2 | 3.89±0.15 ab | 4.25±0.11 ab | 3.87±0.09 b | 4.12±0.04 a | 4.15±0.02 ab | |
T3 | 3.52±0.23 b | 4.11±0.01 ab | 3.79±0.14 b | 3.63±0.05 ab | 3.92±0.03 b | |
T4 | 4.27±0.14 a | 4.47±0.07 a | 3.89±0.04 b | 3.83±0.02 ab | 4.10±0.07 ab | |
T5 | 3.93±0.10 ab | 4.49±0.13 a | 4.29±0.05 a | 3.52±0.06 b | 4.33±0.07 a | |
T6 | 3.93±0.17 ab | 4.05±0.18 b | 4.23±0.06 a | 3.83±0.12 ab | 3.68±0.06 c | |
钾K | CK | 8.69±0.63 c | 11.11±0.39 a | 8.54±0.20 c | 10.38±0.20 a | 6.67±0.41 a |
T1 | 10.20±0.14 a | 10.56±0.15 a | 10.43±0.79 b | 11.57±0.39 a | 6.94±0.29 a | |
T2 | 8.37±0.22 bc | 12.57±0.12 a | 10.09±0.16 b | 10.44±0.14 a | 7.22±0.14 a | |
T3 | 7.69±0.31 bc | 10.46±0.38 a | 8.68±0.22 c | 6.95±0.52 b | 6.31±0.46 a | |
T4 | 9.61±0.30 bc | 11.59±0.28 a | 9.83±0.20 b | 7.26±0.17 b | 7.12±0.86 a | |
T5 | 9.39±0.38 b | 10.95±0.50 a | 10.46±0.34 b | 11.20±0.78 a | 6.52±0.25 a | |
T6 | 9.98±0.48 a | 13.43±0.16 a | 12.15±0.51 a | 6.97±0.30 b | 6.41±0.39 a |
元素 Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | ||
钙Ca | CK | 1.10±0.14 c | 2.47±0.18 a | 2.52±0.03 a | 2.52±0.06 a | 1.58±0.02 c |
T1 | 2.32±0.06 a | 2.44±0.07 a | 2.36±0.08 a | 2.27±0.05 b | 1.96±0.06 ab | |
T2 | 1.39±0.17 bc | 2.49±0.07 a | 2.52±0.01 a | 2.56±0.04 a | 1.91±0.02 b | |
T3 | 1.44±0.07 bc | 2.47±0.03 a | 1.64±0.14 b | 1.42±0.07 d | 1.99±0.05 ab | |
T4 | 1.35±0.08 bc | 2.34±0.10 a | 2.51±0.02 a | 1.60±0.02 c | 2.06±0.02 a | |
T5 | 1.55±0.22 b | 2.41±0.18 a | 2.40±0.08 a | 1.63±0.03 c | 2.06±0.05 a | |
T6 | 2.17±0.10 a | 2.38±0.04 a | 2.17±0.02 a | 1.49±0.05 cd | 2.01±0.03 ab | |
镁Mg | CK | 4.39±0.10 ab | 4.46±0.10 c | 5.01±0.30 c | 5.22±0.10 c | 6.24±0.09 c |
T1 | 4.45±0.31 ab | 4.96±0.31 b | 5.21±0.04 bc | 5.35±0.02 bc | 6.23±0.12 bc | |
T2 | 4.41±0.22 ab | 4.81±0.22 bc | 5.05±0.08 c | 5.68±0.26 b | 6.80±0.10 a | |
T3 | 4.95±0.02 a | 5.24±0.02 ab | 5.47±0.14 b | 6.26±0.10 a | 6.51±0.05 b | |
T4 | 4.60±0.14 ab | 4.93±0.14 b | 5.24±0.08 bc | 6.32±0.11 a | 6.77±0.07 a | |
T5 | 4.34±0.12 ab | 5.64±0.12 a | 6.02±0.01 a | 6.18±0.08 a | 6.21±0.20 bc | |
T6 | 4.22±0.06 b | 5.55±0.06 a | 5.42±0.02 b | 6.31±0.13 a | 6.67±0.01 a |
Table 2 Content of trace elements in grape leaves under different foliar fertilizers
元素 Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | ||
钙Ca | CK | 1.10±0.14 c | 2.47±0.18 a | 2.52±0.03 a | 2.52±0.06 a | 1.58±0.02 c |
T1 | 2.32±0.06 a | 2.44±0.07 a | 2.36±0.08 a | 2.27±0.05 b | 1.96±0.06 ab | |
T2 | 1.39±0.17 bc | 2.49±0.07 a | 2.52±0.01 a | 2.56±0.04 a | 1.91±0.02 b | |
T3 | 1.44±0.07 bc | 2.47±0.03 a | 1.64±0.14 b | 1.42±0.07 d | 1.99±0.05 ab | |
T4 | 1.35±0.08 bc | 2.34±0.10 a | 2.51±0.02 a | 1.60±0.02 c | 2.06±0.02 a | |
T5 | 1.55±0.22 b | 2.41±0.18 a | 2.40±0.08 a | 1.63±0.03 c | 2.06±0.05 a | |
T6 | 2.17±0.10 a | 2.38±0.04 a | 2.17±0.02 a | 1.49±0.05 cd | 2.01±0.03 ab | |
镁Mg | CK | 4.39±0.10 ab | 4.46±0.10 c | 5.01±0.30 c | 5.22±0.10 c | 6.24±0.09 c |
T1 | 4.45±0.31 ab | 4.96±0.31 b | 5.21±0.04 bc | 5.35±0.02 bc | 6.23±0.12 bc | |
T2 | 4.41±0.22 ab | 4.81±0.22 bc | 5.05±0.08 c | 5.68±0.26 b | 6.80±0.10 a | |
T3 | 4.95±0.02 a | 5.24±0.02 ab | 5.47±0.14 b | 6.26±0.10 a | 6.51±0.05 b | |
T4 | 4.60±0.14 ab | 4.93±0.14 b | 5.24±0.08 bc | 6.32±0.11 a | 6.77±0.07 a | |
T5 | 4.34±0.12 ab | 5.64±0.12 a | 6.02±0.01 a | 6.18±0.08 a | 6.21±0.20 bc | |
T6 | 4.22±0.06 b | 5.55±0.06 a | 5.42±0.02 b | 6.31±0.13 a | 6.67±0.01 a |
元素Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ||
铜Cu | CK | 8.35±0.67 a | 3.84±0.61 ab | 5.27±0.30 b | 0.75±0.07 d | 11.87±0.30 d |
T1 | 8.45±0.40 a | 4.88±0.59 a | 6.67±0.57 ab | 4.03±0.23 c | 16.07±2.33 c | |
T2 | 5.92±0.29 b | 2.43±0.08 b | 3.61±0.47 c | 0.40±0.05 d | 20.44±0.40 b | |
T3 | 7.02±0.14 ab | 3.03±0.04 b | 7.66±0.55 a | 13.10±0.77 b | 23.31±0.46 ab | |
T4 | 6.28±0.30 b | 3.42±0.39 ab | 6.37±0.59 ab | 15.11±0.30 a | 23.42±0.95 ab | |
T5 | 5.83±0.35 b | 3.02±0.49 b | 5.51±0.36 b | 12.55±0.89 b | 24.63±0.67 a | |
T6 | 3.93±0.63 c | 2.96±0.32 b | 1.60±0.08 d | 13.05±0.12 b | 22.34±0.17 ab | |
铁Fe | CK | 43.53±2.06 ab | 53.60±1.79 d | 47.34±0.63 a | 26.46±2.54 b | 96.27±2.47 b |
T1 | 43.99±0.50 ab | 62.79±1.00 bc | 55.53±2.14 a | 31.65±5.79 b | 118.41±1.53 a | |
T2 | 41.77±2.48 ab | 57.58±3.50 cd | 16.29±1.86 b | 29.65±1.88 b | 95.89±4.93 b | |
T3 | 36.74±1.25 b | 73.80±1.20 a | 20.25±2.05 b | 84.76±4.99 a | 94.25±3.35 b | |
T4 | 43.06±4.61 ab | 58.89±2.79 cd | 22.89±3.68 b | 96.77±5.10 a | 78.35±3.70 b | |
T5 | 48.84±2.81 a | 68.30±2.54 ab | 17.22±0.90 b | 99.62±11.54 a | 63.52±2.01 c | |
T6 | 43.13±2.82 ab | 63.56±2.71 bc | 21.33±5.01 b | 89.91±3.31 a | 100.77±3.26 b | |
锰Mn | CK | 77.62±3.97 c | 65.91±2.36 b | 70.08±3.00 ab | 75.64±1.69 a | 86.53±4.30 a |
T1 | 85.34±0.86 bc | 109.48±3.23 a | 73.42±2.86 a | 46.40±2.86 c | 75.46±1.72 bc | |
T2 | 55.00±2.96 cd | 67.28±7.47 b | 40.58±2.35 d | 66.61±0.40 b | 71.83±1.44 cd | |
T3 | 76.94±2.15 c | 71.36±5.95 b | 62.24±5.16 bc | 32.26±1.20 e | 66.39±0.04 d | |
T4 | 110.52±0.45 a | 98.20±2.00 a | 76.51±2.85 a | 71.99±0.95 a | 82.55±3.46 ab | |
T5 | 92.19±4.11 b | 96.93±1.60 a | 72.68±1.96 a | 77.06±0.80 a | 81.00±3.10 ab | |
T6 | 47.22±2.85 d | 62.07±2.12 b | 51.77±3.31 c | 41.21±1.06 d | 80.03±1.52 abc | |
锌Zn | CK | 84.41±1.49 c | 143.47±4.98 a | 102.22±5.05 ab | 109.95±1.32 b | 88.47±4.38 a |
T1 | 125.45±2.02 b | 137.25±4.79 ab | 88.22±1.25 bc | 133.94±3.98 a | 73.51±2.40 bc | |
T2 | 118.42±4.15 b | 118.96±10.18 abc | 91.16±2.70 abc | 115.79±0.73 b | 74.43±3.53 b | |
T3 | 129.03±4.96 b | 108.91±1.28 c | 87.39±5.11 bc | 84.48±3.10 d | 64.16±1.87 cd | |
T4 | 149.61±4.17 a | 126.09±12.57 abc | 105.50±1.33 a | 96.55±4.61 c | 66.49±2.71 bcd | |
T5 | 144.05±1.26 a | 129.42±3.88 abc | 91.17±1.72 abc | 89.27±4.44 cd | 64.55±3.45 bcd | |
T6 | 87.91±1.17 c | 115.02±3.52 bc | 82.05±8.10 c | 58.15±2.30 e | 57.23±1.03 d |
Table 3 Micronutrient content of grape leaves under different foliar fertilizers
元素Element | 处理 Treatment | 开花时间Flowering time/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ||
铜Cu | CK | 8.35±0.67 a | 3.84±0.61 ab | 5.27±0.30 b | 0.75±0.07 d | 11.87±0.30 d |
T1 | 8.45±0.40 a | 4.88±0.59 a | 6.67±0.57 ab | 4.03±0.23 c | 16.07±2.33 c | |
T2 | 5.92±0.29 b | 2.43±0.08 b | 3.61±0.47 c | 0.40±0.05 d | 20.44±0.40 b | |
T3 | 7.02±0.14 ab | 3.03±0.04 b | 7.66±0.55 a | 13.10±0.77 b | 23.31±0.46 ab | |
T4 | 6.28±0.30 b | 3.42±0.39 ab | 6.37±0.59 ab | 15.11±0.30 a | 23.42±0.95 ab | |
T5 | 5.83±0.35 b | 3.02±0.49 b | 5.51±0.36 b | 12.55±0.89 b | 24.63±0.67 a | |
T6 | 3.93±0.63 c | 2.96±0.32 b | 1.60±0.08 d | 13.05±0.12 b | 22.34±0.17 ab | |
铁Fe | CK | 43.53±2.06 ab | 53.60±1.79 d | 47.34±0.63 a | 26.46±2.54 b | 96.27±2.47 b |
T1 | 43.99±0.50 ab | 62.79±1.00 bc | 55.53±2.14 a | 31.65±5.79 b | 118.41±1.53 a | |
T2 | 41.77±2.48 ab | 57.58±3.50 cd | 16.29±1.86 b | 29.65±1.88 b | 95.89±4.93 b | |
T3 | 36.74±1.25 b | 73.80±1.20 a | 20.25±2.05 b | 84.76±4.99 a | 94.25±3.35 b | |
T4 | 43.06±4.61 ab | 58.89±2.79 cd | 22.89±3.68 b | 96.77±5.10 a | 78.35±3.70 b | |
T5 | 48.84±2.81 a | 68.30±2.54 ab | 17.22±0.90 b | 99.62±11.54 a | 63.52±2.01 c | |
T6 | 43.13±2.82 ab | 63.56±2.71 bc | 21.33±5.01 b | 89.91±3.31 a | 100.77±3.26 b | |
锰Mn | CK | 77.62±3.97 c | 65.91±2.36 b | 70.08±3.00 ab | 75.64±1.69 a | 86.53±4.30 a |
T1 | 85.34±0.86 bc | 109.48±3.23 a | 73.42±2.86 a | 46.40±2.86 c | 75.46±1.72 bc | |
T2 | 55.00±2.96 cd | 67.28±7.47 b | 40.58±2.35 d | 66.61±0.40 b | 71.83±1.44 cd | |
T3 | 76.94±2.15 c | 71.36±5.95 b | 62.24±5.16 bc | 32.26±1.20 e | 66.39±0.04 d | |
T4 | 110.52±0.45 a | 98.20±2.00 a | 76.51±2.85 a | 71.99±0.95 a | 82.55±3.46 ab | |
T5 | 92.19±4.11 b | 96.93±1.60 a | 72.68±1.96 a | 77.06±0.80 a | 81.00±3.10 ab | |
T6 | 47.22±2.85 d | 62.07±2.12 b | 51.77±3.31 c | 41.21±1.06 d | 80.03±1.52 abc | |
锌Zn | CK | 84.41±1.49 c | 143.47±4.98 a | 102.22±5.05 ab | 109.95±1.32 b | 88.47±4.38 a |
T1 | 125.45±2.02 b | 137.25±4.79 ab | 88.22±1.25 bc | 133.94±3.98 a | 73.51±2.40 bc | |
T2 | 118.42±4.15 b | 118.96±10.18 abc | 91.16±2.70 abc | 115.79±0.73 b | 74.43±3.53 b | |
T3 | 129.03±4.96 b | 108.91±1.28 c | 87.39±5.11 bc | 84.48±3.10 d | 64.16±1.87 cd | |
T4 | 149.61±4.17 a | 126.09±12.57 abc | 105.50±1.33 a | 96.55±4.61 c | 66.49±2.71 bcd | |
T5 | 144.05±1.26 a | 129.42±3.88 abc | 91.17±1.72 abc | 89.27±4.44 cd | 64.55±3.45 bcd | |
T6 | 87.91±1.17 c | 115.02±3.52 bc | 82.05±8.10 c | 58.15±2.30 e | 57.23±1.03 d |
Fig. 4 Weights of clusters and single berry of grape under different foliar fertilizersNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 5 Soluble solids and soluble protein contents in grape under different foliar fertilizersNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 6 Sugar to acid ratio of grape under different foliar fertilizersNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 7 Effects of different foliar fertilizers on the content of total anthocyanins and flavonoids in grape peelNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 8 Effects of different foliar fertilizers on the content of tannin and total phenols in grape fruitsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
指标Index | 第1主成分PC1 | 第2主成分PC2 | 第3主成分PC3 |
---|---|---|---|
穗重 Weight per single cluster | 0.549 | -0.810 | -0.101 |
粒重 Weight per single berry | 0.938 | -0.270 | 0.136 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.745 | 0.529 | -0.203 |
可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugars | 0.632 | 0.748 | -0.131 |
总酸 Total acids | -0.936 | 0.193 | 0.190 |
糖酸比 Sugar to acid ratio | 0.916 | 0.254 | -0.199 |
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | 0.102 | 0.205 | 0.966 |
类黄酮 Flavonoids | 0.968 | 0.070 | 0.172 |
总花青素 Total anthocyanins | 0.950 | -0.088 | 0.009 |
单宁 Tannin | 0.916 | -0.055 | 0.124 |
总酚 Total phenols | 0.916 | -0.191 | 0.146 |
特征值Eigen value | 7.379 | 1.765 | 1.163 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 67.083 | 16.044 | 10.575 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 67.083 | 83.127 | 93.701 |
Table 4 Principal component analysis of grape quality index
指标Index | 第1主成分PC1 | 第2主成分PC2 | 第3主成分PC3 |
---|---|---|---|
穗重 Weight per single cluster | 0.549 | -0.810 | -0.101 |
粒重 Weight per single berry | 0.938 | -0.270 | 0.136 |
可溶性固形物 Soluble solids | 0.745 | 0.529 | -0.203 |
可溶性总糖 Total soluble sugars | 0.632 | 0.748 | -0.131 |
总酸 Total acids | -0.936 | 0.193 | 0.190 |
糖酸比 Sugar to acid ratio | 0.916 | 0.254 | -0.199 |
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | 0.102 | 0.205 | 0.966 |
类黄酮 Flavonoids | 0.968 | 0.070 | 0.172 |
总花青素 Total anthocyanins | 0.950 | -0.088 | 0.009 |
单宁 Tannin | 0.916 | -0.055 | 0.124 |
总酚 Total phenols | 0.916 | -0.191 | 0.146 |
特征值Eigen value | 7.379 | 1.765 | 1.163 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 67.083 | 16.044 | 10.575 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 67.083 | 83.127 | 93.701 |
处理 Treatment | F1 | F2 | F3 | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -1.459 88 | 0.523 71 | -0.035 61 | -0.899 07 | 7 |
T1 | -0.709 93 | 0.773 46 | -0.701 22 | -0.426 30 | 5 |
T2 | -0.192 16 | 0.533 64 | 1.587 63 | 0.124 60 | 3 |
T3 | -0.471 88 | -2.116 23 | 0.315 24 | -0.622 74 | 6 |
T4 | 0.433 94 | -0.209 75 | -1.652 61 | 0.082 68 | 4 |
T5 | 1.336 04 | -0.066 81 | 0.380 34 | 0.925 75 | 1 |
T6 | 1.063 88 | 0.561 98 | 0.106 20 | 0.815 08 | 2 |
Table 5 Comprehensive evaluation ranking of different treatments
处理 Treatment | F1 | F2 | F3 | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -1.459 88 | 0.523 71 | -0.035 61 | -0.899 07 | 7 |
T1 | -0.709 93 | 0.773 46 | -0.701 22 | -0.426 30 | 5 |
T2 | -0.192 16 | 0.533 64 | 1.587 63 | 0.124 60 | 3 |
T3 | -0.471 88 | -2.116 23 | 0.315 24 | -0.622 74 | 6 |
T4 | 0.433 94 | -0.209 75 | -1.652 61 | 0.082 68 | 4 |
T5 | 1.336 04 | -0.066 81 | 0.380 34 | 0.925 75 | 1 |
T6 | 1.063 88 | 0.561 98 | 0.106 20 | 0.815 08 | 2 |
1 | RUSTIONI L, ALTOMARE A, SHANSHIASHVILI G,et al.. Microclimate of grape bunch and sunburn of white grape berries: effect on wine quality [J]. Foods, 2023,12(3):621-632. |
2 | 张晓煜,李红英,陈卫平,等.中国北方干白酒用葡萄生态区划[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(11):3107-3111. |
ZHANG X Y, LI H Y, CHEN W P,et al.. Ecological regionalization of dry white wine grapes in Northern China [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2014,33(11):3107-3111. | |
3 | 杨博,张波,王学庆,等.酚类物质添加对‘黑比诺’干红葡萄酒发酵阶段主要香气成分的影响[J].西北农业学报,2021,30(10):1514-1525. |
YANG B, ZHANG B, WANG X Q,et al.. Effect of phenolics addition on main aroma components of ‘Pinot Noir’ dry red wine during fermentation [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021,30(10):1514-1525. | |
4 | 朱臻,杨相东,徐章倩,等.农作物叶片对大气沉降重金属的吸收转运和积累机制[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(2):332-345. |
ZHU Z, YANG X D, XU Z Q, et al.. Foliar uptake,translocation and accumulation of heavy metals from atmospheric deposition in crops [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2021,27(2):332-345. | |
5 | 孙得芳,王娜,庞世花,等.叶面肥发展现状与展望[J].山东化工,2017,46(7):89-90. |
SUN D F, WANG N, PANG S H, et al.. The foliar fertilizer development status and prospect [J]. Shandong Chem. Ind., 2017,46(7):89-90. | |
6 | NIU J H, LIU C, HUANG M L,et al.. Effects of foliar fertilization:a review of current status and future perspectives [J]. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 2021,21(1):104-118. |
7 | 何键,聂兆广,李玲玉,等.螯合肥料在农业上的应用效果研究[J].土壤通报,2017,48(2):507-512. |
HE J, NIE Z G, LI L Y, et al.. The application effects of chelate fertilizers in agriculture [J].Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2017,48(2):507-512. | |
8 | 王鑫.叶施不同配比氮、钾对‘长富2号’苹果叶片生理特性及果实品质的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021. |
WANG X. Effects of different ratios of nitrogen and potassium on leaf physiological characteristics and fruit quality of ‘Chang Fu 2’ apple [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2021. | |
9 | 祁雅馨. 四种叶面肥对‘夏黑’葡萄光合特性及果实品质的影响[D].成都:四川农业大学,2022. |
QI Y X. Effects of four foliar fertilizers on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of ‘Summer black’ grape [D]. Chenngdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022. | |
10 | 吴茂东.施氮时期对‘黑比诺’葡萄矿质元素含量及果实品质的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2020. |
WU M D. Effect of nitrogen application period on mineral elements content and fruit quality of ‘Pinot Noir’ grape [D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2020. | |
11 | 温云杰,李桂花,黄金莉,等.连续流动分析仪与自动凯氏定氮仪测定小麦秸秆全氮含量之比较[J].中国土壤与肥料,2015(6):146-151. |
WEN Y J, LI G H, HUANG J L, et al.. Determination nitrogen in the Kjeldahl digests of plant samples by continuous flow analyzer in comparison with auto-mated distillation-titration instrument [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2015(6):146-151. | |
12 | 李萍,李明明,王浩,等.改良钼锑抗比色法测定不同谷子材料组织磷含量[J].激光生物学报,2020,29(3):237-244. |
LI P, LI M M, WANG H, et al.. Determination of phosphorus content in different millet tissues by modified molybdenum-antimony anti-colorimetric method [J].Acta Laser Biol. Sin., 2020, 29(3):237-244. | |
13 | 林应兴.菌草栽培平菇子实体的营养成分分析[J].江西农业学报,2023,35(1):172-176. |
LIN Y X. Analysis of nutritional components in fruiting body of oyster mushrooms cultivated with Juncao [J].Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2023,35(1):172-176. | |
14 | 代红军,魏强,贺琰,等.油菜素内酯对高温胁迫下葡萄花色苷合成及果实品质的影响[J].园艺学报,2023,50(8):1711-1722. |
DAI H J, WEI Q, HE Y, et al.. Effects of brassinolide treatment on anthocyanin synthesis and quality in grape under high temperature stress [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2023,50(8):1711-1722. | |
15 | 国家卫生健康委员会,国家市场监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准食品中总酸的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021. |
16 | 梁玲,黄玉琼,陈小红.不同色彩珙桐叶片和苞片解剖结构及色素含量比较研究[J].西北植物学报,2020,40(9):1539-1548. |
LIANG L, HUANG Y Q, CHEN X H. Anatomical structure and pigment content of Davidia involucrata leaves and bracts with different colors [J].Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2020,40(9):1539-1548. | |
17 | 马宗桓,李玉梅,李彦彪,等.‘赤霞珠’葡萄在河西走廊产区不同产地的品质分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(3):80-87. |
MA Z H, LI Y M, LI Y B, et al.. Quality analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes fromdifferent producing areas in Hexi Corridor [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2023, 41(3):80-87. | |
18 | 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:182-185. |
19 | 冷寒冰,万宁海,刘群录.香樟冠层光环境对叶片功能性状和光合特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(8):2113-2122. |
LENG H B, WAN N H, LIU Q L. Effects of light environments within Cinnamomum camphora canopy on leaf functional traits and photosyn-thetic characteristics [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2023,34(8):2113-2122. | |
20 | 杨明昊,张艺灿,王孝娣,等.葡萄枝条堆肥对设施栽培葡萄园土壤和87-1葡萄生长发育的影响[J].中国果树,2023(4):78-81, 86. |
21 | 杜海萌,韦还和,余清源,等.水稻叶面肥研究的应用进展与展望[J].作物杂志,2022(3):33-38. |
DU H M, WEI H H, YU Q Y, et al.. Application progress and prospect of rice foliar fertilizer [J]. Crops, 2022(3):33-38. | |
22 | 刘喆, GEORGEANDREW C B,岑伊静,等.叶面肥对柑橘全爪螨生长发育和繁殖及柑橘苗生长的影响[J].昆虫学报,2021,64(9):1104-1111. |
LIU Z, GEORGEANDREW C B, CENG Y J, et al.. Effects of four foliar fertilizers on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of ‘Summer Black’ grape [J]. Acta Entomol. Sin., 2021, 64(9):1104-1111. | |
23 | 潘越,史彦江,陈淑英,等.喷施叶面肥对平欧杂种榛‘新榛1号’嫩枝扦插的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2016,38(5):920-926. |
PAN Y, SHI Y J, CHEN S Y, et al.. Effect of foliar fertilizers on the hybrid hazel ‘New hazel one’ twig cutting [J]. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis, 2016,38(5):920-926. | |
24 | TEJADA M, GONZALEZ J L. Influence of foliar fertilization with amino acids and humic acids on productivity and quality of Asparagus [J]. Biol. Agric. Hortic., 2003, 21(3):277-291. |
25 | 任盼盼,马小沙,韦帮稳,等.稀土叶面肥对荔枝光合作用和成花坐果的影响[J].果树学报,2021,38(9):1540-1549. |
REN P P, MA X S, WEI B W, et al.. Effects of foliar rare earth fertilizer on photosynthesis,flowering and fruiting in Litchi chinensis [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2021,38(9):1540-1549. | |
26 | 张树衡,丁德东,何静,等.两种生物肥料配施对再植花椒生长及光合特性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2021,30(9):1355-1364. |
ZHANG S H, DING D D, HE J, et al.. Effect of two biofertilizer mixtures on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of replanted Zanthoxylum bungeanum [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021,30(9):1355-1364. | |
27 | 李玉静,冯雨晴,赵园园,等.不同形态氮素吸收利用及其对植物生理代谢影响的综述[J].中国农业科技导报,2023,25(2):128-139. |
LI Y J, FENG Y Q, ZHAO Y Y, et al.. Review of absorption and utilization of different nitrogen forms and their effects on plant physiological metabolism [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023,25(2):128-139. | |
28 | 宋奇娉,封鹏雯,刘洋,等.PSⅡ组装与修复循环机制研究进展[J].植物生理学报,2019,55(2):133-140. |
SONG Q P, FENG P W, LIU Y, et al.. The research progress of the mechanism on PSⅡ assemble and repair circulation [J].Plant Physiol. J., 2019, 55(2):133-140. | |
29 | 张玉秀,张凯,李金梅,等.镍在植物体中的吸收转运机制[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(3):778-782. |
ZHANG Y X, ZHANG K, LI J M,et al.. Absorption and transportation mechanism of nickel in plants [J]. Chin. J. Ecol. Agric., 2008,16(3):778-782. | |
30 | 卢柏山,董会,赵久然,等.不同鲜食玉米品种适采期氨基酸含量分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2023,25(11):132-142. |
LU B S, DONG H, ZHAO J R, et al.. Amino acid content analysis of different fresh corn varieties at suitable harvest time [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023,25(11):132-142. | |
31 | 杨旭,林清,黄丽,等.留树保鲜对恭城水柿果实品质、贮藏特性及翌年果实产量和品质的影响[J].果树学报,2023,40(11):2435-2445. |
YANG X, LIN Q, HUANG L, et al.. Effects of plant regulators and leaf fertilization on fruit quality, storage ability of persimmon on- tree storage and yield and quality of the fruits next season [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2023, 40(11):2435-2445. | |
32 | 韩艳婷,杨国顺,石雪晖,等.不同镁营养水平对红地球葡萄叶绿体结构及光合响应的影响[J].果树学报,2011,28(4):603-609. |
HAN Y T, YANG G S, SHI X H,et al.. Effects of different magnesium concentrations on chloroplast ultrastructure and photosynthetic response of Vitis vinifera cv.Red Globe [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2011, 28(4):603-609. | |
33 | 杜玉霞,李晶,寸待泽,等.低镁胁迫对不同柠檬品种植株矿质养分含量以及果实产量、品质的影响[J].果树学报,2021,38(8):1330-1339. |
DU Y X, LI J, CUN D Z, et al.. Effects of low magnesium stress on plant growth, photosynthetic characteristics and magnesium content of different lemon varieties [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2021, 38(8):1330-1339. | |
34 | 唐明佳,徐进,林锐,等.番茄响应光温逆境的生理分子机制研究进展[J].园艺学报,2022,49(10):2174-2188. |
TANG M J, XU J, LIN R, et al.. Advances in physiological and molecular mechanism of tomato responses to light and temperature stress [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2022, 49(10):2174-2188. | |
35 | 何孝英.腐植酸叶面肥对柠檬主要次生代谢产物的影响[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2018. |
HE X Y. Effects of humic acid foliar fertilizers on the main secondary metabolites of citrus lemon [D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2018. | |
36 | 王慧亮.浙江栽培蓝莓品种果实品质分析及滤光膜和叶面肥对其影响[D].金华:浙江师范大学,2010. |
WANG H L. Blueberry fruit quality analysis of Zhejiang cultivated varieties andeffect of filter membrane and foliar spray organic fertilizer [D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University, 2010. | |
37 | GAALICHE B, LADHARI A, ZARRELLI A,et al..Impact of foliar potassium fertilization on biochemical composition and antioxidant activity of fig (Ficus carica L.) [J]. Sci. Hortic., 2019,253:111-119. |
[1] | Ruyue WANG, Haifang HU, Shasha LUO, Ziyi ZHEN, Yeyong XU, Xiaojing HU. Fruit Quality Analysis of Prunus domestica × armeniaca at Different Harvest Maturity Levels [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 158-169. |
[2] | Baozhen ZENG, Yongjuan CHENG, Juanbo YANG, Lili CHE, Jing LIANG, Shixiong LU, Guoping LIANG, Zonghuan MA, Juan MAO. Determination of the Best Harvesting Period for ‘Muhe White’ Grape in Minqin District, Gansu Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 70-79. |
[3] | Li MA, Tingting CAO, Youwei FAN, Zhiyu REN, Chun LIU, Suxia YUAN. Effects of Different Rooting Reagents on Rooting of Miniature Potted Rose Cuttings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 50-60. |
[4] | Shouhua PENG, Mingming XU, Jiqiang WEI, Lijun LIANG, Quan YE, Xiaoyuan CHI, Shaofeng ZHANG, Xiangli DONG. Effects of Increase Applying of Biofertilizer Strain FBR1 on Growth Development and Yield of Peanut [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 200-205. |
[5] | Dengyang LU, Panpan TONG, Min YAN, Jingkai BAO, Mingzhe LIU, Yilei XIA, Cuiyun WU. Identification and Evaluation of Korla Pear Bud Sport with Larger Fruit Size [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 52-64. |
[6] | Shengyan YANG, Man CAO, Baoshi GUO, Chao YANG, Zhixia HOU. Effects of Different Iron Environments on the Growth and Leaf Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Blueberry [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 52-62. |
[7] | Shijian BAI, Jinge HU, Jiuyun WU, Wen ZHANG, Hui XIE, Ronghua ZHAO, Guang CHEN, Junshe CAI. Effects of Rootstocks on the Growth Characteristics and Fruit Quality of ‘Crimson Seedless’ Grapes in Turpan Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 76-87. |
[8] | Shijiang ZHU, Hu LI, Wen XU, Yating FENG. Effects of Soil Moisture Content on Fruit Quality in Citrus Orchards Within Three Gorges Reservoir Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 201-207. |
[9] | Xin JIN, Lu ZHANG, Peng WU, Ping LI, Wei TAN, Mingying GUI. Effects of Shading Treatment on Growth and Enzyme Activity of Bonsai Ganoderma lucidum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 147-156. |
[10] | Yujing LI, Yuqing FENG, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Hongzhi SHI. Review of Absorption and Utilization of Different Nitrogen Forms and Their Effects on Plant Physiological Metabolism [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 128-139. |
[11] | Yinan JIA, Zhongwu WAN, Chang XU, Guangdi ZHANG, Jianglong WANG, Kunming ZHANG, Xiaojian HOU, Wenyi BAO, Yu WANG, Weijun CHEN. Analysis of ‘Daqing Grape’ Quality Index Based on Big-trellis in Open Field Cultivation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 44-57. |
[12] | Ping WU, Xiaoyu WANG, Junxia GUO, Songlin ZHANG, Qingmiao LI, Qingmao FANG. Effects of Early Bolting on Growth and Quality of Angelica dahurica [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 58-66. |
[13] | Juanjuan GUO, Shan WANG, Haoan LUAN, Han LI, Suping GUO, Guohui QI, Xuemei ZHANG. Effects of Microbial Inoculum on Red Raspberry Growth, Fruit Quality and Activating Soil Phosphorus and Potassium [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 198-209. |
[14] | Shuxin QI, Xiaolei WEN, Tingfeng JI, Zengzhi SI, Chunming ZHAO, Yake QIAO, Yanmin WANG, Aijun CAI, Haihua ZHANG, Zhixin JI. Effect of Fox Raccoon Manure on the Growth and Development of Black Soldier Fly [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 201-206. |
[15] | Fangling WANG, Mingyue ZHANG, Yaru ZHOU, Qinglin GUAN, Xinyan LI, Qiu ZHONG, Mingqin ZHAO. Effect of TS-PAA Water Retaining Agent on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Cigar under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 162-172. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||