中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 156-165.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0200
• 生物制造 资源生态 • 上一篇
党翼(), 张建军(
), 赵刚, 樊廷录, 王磊, 李尚中, 周刚
收稿日期:
2021-03-11
接受日期:
2021-07-07
出版日期:
2022-06-15
发布日期:
2022-06-21
通讯作者:
张建军
作者简介:
党翼 E-mail:22126670@qq.com;
基金资助:
Yi DANG(), Jianjun ZHANG(
), Gang ZHAO, Tinglu FAN, Lei WANG, Shangzhong LI, Gang ZHOU
Received:
2021-03-11
Accepted:
2021-07-07
Online:
2022-06-15
Published:
2022-06-21
Contact:
Jianjun ZHANG
摘要:
为研究控释尿素与普通尿素配施对旱地玉米生长发育、水氮利用效率及产量性状的影响,以先玉335为试验材料,设置不施氮(CK1)、全施普通尿素(CK2)、全施控释尿素(CK3)和普通尿素与控释尿素按照7∶3(T1)、5∶5(T2)、3∶7(T3)比例配施,分析不同处理玉米叶片SPAD值、干物质积累、阶段耗水量、水氮利用效率及产量性状变化。结果表明,T3处理的SPAD值和全生育期干物质积累量较高,均衡了玉米生育期耗水进程,通过协调全生育期氮素养分的均衡供应达到以水促肥的效果,氮肥利用率为38.8%;同时,T3处理的旱地玉米产量和水分利用效率较高,分别为13 354.5 kg·hm-2和33.60 kg·hm-2·mm-1,较其他施氮处理增加14.6%~30.1%和6.8%~15.4%;分析各产量构成因素表明,T3处理的穗粒数和百粒重显著提高,分别为642.2粒和30.8 g,较其他施氮处理增加2.0%~6.0%和3.9%~12.0%。由此表明,70%控释尿素+30%普通尿素配施更有利于促进春玉米生长发育,实现高产和水氮高效利用。
中图分类号:
党翼, 张建军, 赵刚, 樊廷录, 王磊, 李尚中, 周刚. 控释尿素和普通尿素配施对旱地玉米产量和水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 156-165.
Yi DANG, Jianjun ZHANG, Gang ZHAO, Tinglu FAN, Lei WANG, Shangzhong LI, Gang ZHOU. Effects of Mixed Applying of Controlled-release Urea and Conventional Urea on Yield,Water and Nitrogen Utilization of Maize in Dryland[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 156-165.
图2 不同处理在各生育期叶片的SPAD值注:不同小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间差异在P<0.05水平显著。
Fig. 2 SPAD value of leaf at different stages under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图3 不同处理不同生育时期单株干物质积累变化注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异在P<0.05水平显著。
Fig 3 Dry matter accumulation per plant at different stages under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图4 不同处理玉米花前和花后的单株干物质积累量注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异在P<0.05水平显著。
Fig. 4 Dry matter accumulation per plant at pre?flowering and post?flowering under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 播种-苗期 Sowing-seeding | 苗期-拔节期 Seeding-jointing | 拔节期-抽雄期 Jointing-tasseling | 抽雄期-灌浆期 Tasseling-filling | 灌浆期-收获期 Filling-harvesting | 全生育期 Whole stage | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | |
CK1 | 16.6±1.4 c | 50.5 | 81.6±2.4 ab | 23.1 | 148.5±4.2 b | 183 | 81.5±6.6 ab | 158.3 | 57.1±4.7 c | 35.3 | 385.3±6.9 c |
CK2 | 20.8±2.3 bc | 50.5 | 68.9±5.9 bc | 23.1 | 157.5±4.6 ab | 183 | 92.9±5.5 a | 158.3 | 52.2±1.2 c | 35.3 | 392.2±8.2 c |
CK3 | 24.4±3.9 abc | 50.5 | 61.7±4.6 c | 23.1 | 168.1±8.4 ab | 183 | 83.1±4.4 ab | 158.3 | 50.3±1.9 c | 35.3 | 387.7±8.9 c |
T1 | 30.1±1.3 a | 50.5 | 75.4±7.0 abc | 23.1 | 161.7±7.0 ab | 183 | 80.0±8.6 ab | 158.3 | 50.2±7.7 c | 35.3 | 397.5±8.7 bc |
T2 | 23.1±9.1 abc | 50.5 | 82.8±2.6 ab | 23.1 | 170.1±12.6 a | 183 | 76.5±6.8 ab | 158.3 | 72.9±2.6 b | 35.3 | 425.5±8.6 ab |
T3 | 25.7±6.7 ab | 50.5 | 91.1±6.3 a | 23.1 | 176.3±14.4 a | 183 | 68.1±5.0 b | 158.3 | 80.8±4.0 a | 35.3 | 442.2±8.9 a |
表1 不同处理在各生育阶段的耗水量 (mm)
Table 1 Water consumption at different stages under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 播种-苗期 Sowing-seeding | 苗期-拔节期 Seeding-jointing | 拔节期-抽雄期 Jointing-tasseling | 抽雄期-灌浆期 Tasseling-filling | 灌浆期-收获期 Filling-harvesting | 全生育期 Whole stage | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | |
CK1 | 16.6±1.4 c | 50.5 | 81.6±2.4 ab | 23.1 | 148.5±4.2 b | 183 | 81.5±6.6 ab | 158.3 | 57.1±4.7 c | 35.3 | 385.3±6.9 c |
CK2 | 20.8±2.3 bc | 50.5 | 68.9±5.9 bc | 23.1 | 157.5±4.6 ab | 183 | 92.9±5.5 a | 158.3 | 52.2±1.2 c | 35.3 | 392.2±8.2 c |
CK3 | 24.4±3.9 abc | 50.5 | 61.7±4.6 c | 23.1 | 168.1±8.4 ab | 183 | 83.1±4.4 ab | 158.3 | 50.3±1.9 c | 35.3 | 387.7±8.9 c |
T1 | 30.1±1.3 a | 50.5 | 75.4±7.0 abc | 23.1 | 161.7±7.0 ab | 183 | 80.0±8.6 ab | 158.3 | 50.2±7.7 c | 35.3 | 397.5±8.7 bc |
T2 | 23.1±9.1 abc | 50.5 | 82.8±2.6 ab | 23.1 | 170.1±12.6 a | 183 | 76.5±6.8 ab | 158.3 | 72.9±2.6 b | 35.3 | 425.5±8.6 ab |
T3 | 25.7±6.7 ab | 50.5 | 91.1±6.3 a | 23.1 | 176.3±14.4 a | 183 | 68.1±5.0 b | 158.3 | 80.8±4.0 a | 35.3 | 442.2±8.9 a |
图5 不同处理花前花后的耗水量注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异在P<0.05水平显著。
Fig. 5 Water consumption in pre?flowering and post?flowering under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 水分利用效率 WUE/(kg·hm-2·mm-1) | 百粒重 100-grain weight/g | 穗粒数 Grain No. per ear |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 11 620.5±460.0 d | 30.15±1.9 c | 29.4±1.7 b | 611.3±16.6 c |
CK2 | 12 478.5±473.5 cd | 31.85±2.1 bc | 31.6±1.5 ab | 630.4±21.9 bc |
CK3 | 13 314.0±216.6 bc | 34.35±1.8 ab | 33.0±2.7 ab | 647.1±25.9 ab |
T1 | 13 354.5±417.9 bc | 33.60±1.5 b | 30.8±1.6 ab | 642.4±17.4 abc |
T2 | 14 166.0±493.3 b | 33.30±0.7 b | 33.2±0.9 ab | 654.8±17.1 ab |
T3 | 16 230.0±400.7 a | 36.70±1.6 a | 34.5±1.7 a | 668.2±19.1 a |
表2 不同处理产量性状及水分利用效率
Table 2 Yield characteristic and water use efficiency under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 水分利用效率 WUE/(kg·hm-2·mm-1) | 百粒重 100-grain weight/g | 穗粒数 Grain No. per ear |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 11 620.5±460.0 d | 30.15±1.9 c | 29.4±1.7 b | 611.3±16.6 c |
CK2 | 12 478.5±473.5 cd | 31.85±2.1 bc | 31.6±1.5 ab | 630.4±21.9 bc |
CK3 | 13 314.0±216.6 bc | 34.35±1.8 ab | 33.0±2.7 ab | 647.1±25.9 ab |
T1 | 13 354.5±417.9 bc | 33.60±1.5 b | 30.8±1.6 ab | 642.4±17.4 abc |
T2 | 14 166.0±493.3 b | 33.30±0.7 b | 33.2±0.9 ab | 654.8±17.1 ab |
T3 | 16 230.0±400.7 a | 36.70±1.6 a | 34.5±1.7 a | 668.2±19.1 a |
图6 不同处理氮肥利用效率注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异在P<0.05水平显著。
Fig. 6 Nitrogen use efficiency under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
1 | 张在一,毛学峰,杨军.站在变革十字路口的玉米:主粮还是饲料粮之论[J].中国农村经济,2019(6):38-53. |
ZHANG Z Y, MAO X F, YANG J. Maize at the crossroads: Staple food grain or feed grain [J]. Chin. Rural Econ., 2019(6):38-53. | |
2 | 孙多鑫,柴宗文,赵贵宾.甘肃省旱作区玉米生产机械化发展分析与对策[J].农业机械,2019(4):82-84. |
SUN D X, CHAI Z W, ZHAO G B. Development analysis and countermeasures of maize production mechanization in dry farming area of Gansu Province [J]. Agric. Mach., 2019(4):82-84. | |
3 | 刘武仁,郑金玉,罗洋,等.概述氮肥水平对玉米生理及产量性状的影响[J].华北农学报,2010,25(S1):239-242. |
LIU W R, ZHENG J Y, LUO Y, et al.. Research advance on physiological changes respond to level of N application [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2010, 25(S1):239-242. | |
4 | 孙浒,张吉旺,靳立斌.玉米高产与氮肥高效协同实现存在的问题及其途径[J].玉米科学,2014,22(1):143-148. |
SUN H, ZHANG J W, JIN L B. Problems and approaches of achieving high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency in maize production [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2014, 22(1):143-148. | |
5 | 黄东风,王果,李卫华,等.不同施肥模式对蔬菜生长、氮肥利用及采地氮流失的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(3):631-638. |
HUANG D F, WANG G L, WEI H, et al.. Effects of different fertilization modes on vegetable growth, fertlizer nitrogen utilization and nitrogen loss from vegetable field [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2009, 20(3):631-638. | |
6 | 郭萍,朱从桦,査丽,等.缓释尿素与普通尿素不同配比对玉米氮代谢酶和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料.2016(6):99-105. |
GUO P, ZHU C H, ZHA L, et al.. Effects of the combined application of slow-release urea and urea on activities of key enzymes related to nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen utilization of maize [J]. China Soil Fert., 2016(6):99-105. | |
7 | 李敏,武际,韩上,等.控释氮肥拔节期施用对冬小麦产量及干物质、氮素累积与分配的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2017,37(7):955-962. |
LI M, WU J, HAN S, et al.. Effect of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer as jointing fertilizer on yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and distribution in winter wheat [J]. J. Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37(7):955-962. | |
8 | GAO X, LI C, ZHANG M,et al.. Controlled release urea improved the nitrogen use efficiency,yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) on silt loamy soil [J]. Field Crops Res.,2015, 181:60-68. |
9 | YANG Y C, ZHANG M, LI Y C, et al.. Controlled release urea improved nitrogen use efficiency,activities of leaf enzymes, and rice yield [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2012, 76(6):2307-2317. |
10 | 冯小杰,战秀梅,王雪鑫,等.包膜尿素不同配比减施对土壤无机氮含量及玉米氮素吸收的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(10):1733-1745. |
FENG X J, ZHAN X M, WANG X X, et al.. Effects of soil inorganic nitrogen and nitrogen absorbing by maize under the reduced application of coated urea at different proportions [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2019, 52(10):1733-1745. | |
11 | 张建军,党翼,赵刚,等.控释氮肥全量基施对旱地玉米产量形成和水肥利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):170-177. |
ZHANG J J, DANG Y, ZHAO G, et al.. Effects of application of controlled-release nitrogen on yield and waterand fertilizer use efficiencies of maize [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2021, 35(2):170-177. | |
12 | 纪洋,于海洋,徐华.控释肥与尿素配合施用对稻季土壤CH4和N2O 排放的影响[J].生态环境学报,2017,26(9):1494-1500. |
JI Y, YU H Y, XU H. Effect of controlled-release fertilizer and its combined application with urea on CH4 and N2O emissions in rice soil [J]. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 2017, 26(9):1494-1500. | |
13 | 金容,李兰,郭萍,等.控释氮肥比例对土壤氮含量和玉米氮素吸收利用的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):214-221. |
JIN R, LI L, GUO P, et al.. Effect of the mixed ratios of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on soil nitrogen content and its up-take and utilization of maize [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2018, 32(6):214-221. | |
14 | GUO J J, ZHANG F C, WANG H D, et al.. Effects of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer and urea blending on maize growth and nitrogen uptake under different nitrogen application rates [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(20):3930-3943. |
15 | MA B L, DWYER L M. Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids in leaf senescence [J]. Plant Soil, 1998, 19:283-291. |
16 | 刘占军,谢佳贵,张宽,等.不同氮肥管理对吉林春玉米生长发育和养分吸收的影响 [J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(1): 38-47. |
LIU Z J, XIE JG, ZHANG K, et al.. Maize growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by nitrogen management in Jilin Province [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2011, 17(1):38-47. | |
17 | KIMETU J M, LEHMANN J, KRULL E. Stability and stabilisation of biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents [J]. Soil Res., 2010, 48(7):577-585. |
18 | 赵斌,董树亭,张吉旺,等.控释肥对夏玉米产量和氮素积累与分配的影响[J].作物学报,2010,36(10):1760-1768. |
ZHAO B, DONG S T, ZHANG J W, et al.. Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on yield and nitrogen accumulation and distribution in summer maize [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2010, 36(10):1760-1768. | |
19 | 朱红英,董树亭,胡昌浩,等.不同控释肥用量对玉米生产效应的影响[J].玉米科学,2007,15(2):114-116. |
ZHU H Y, DONG S T, HU C H, et al.. Study on different dosages of controlled- release fertilizers in influencing the yield and efficiency of maize [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2007, 15(2):114-116. | |
20 | 梁熠,康建宏,朱荣,等.控释、常规尿素配施对雨养区春玉米产量及氮素利用的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):237-241, 278. |
LIANG Y, KANG J H, ZHU R, et al.. Effect of mixed applying controlled-release urea and conventional urea on yield and nitrogen utilization of spring maize in rain fed region [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2017, 31(6):237-241, 278. | |
21 | ZHENG W K, ZHANG M, LIU Z G, et al.. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system [J]. Field Crops Res., 2016, 197(4):52-62. |
22 | 郭萍,黄科程,李孝东,等.普通、控释尿素配比对玉米物质积累及产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):191-196. |
GUO P, HUANG K C, LI X D, et al.. Effect of combined application of controlled-released urea and urea on dry matter accumulation and yield of maize [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2017, 31(1):191-196. | |
23 | 朱宝国.控释氮肥对土壤硝态氮和玉米植株全氮含量及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(6):220-223. |
ZHU B G. Effects of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on soil nitrate nitrogen and plant total nitrogen content and yield of corn [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2014, 30(6):220-223. | |
24 | 李前,秦裕波,孔丽丽,等.不同类型的缓/控释肥对玉米氮素吸收及土壤速效氮的影响[J].玉米科学,2017,25(4):123-128. |
LI Q, QIN Y B, KONG L L, et al.. Effects on maize nitrogen uptake and soil available nitrogen of different kinds of slow/controlled release fertilizers [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2017, 25(4):123-128. | |
25 | 解文艳,周怀平,杨振兴,等.控释尿素与普通尿素配施对春玉米产量、氮肥利用及经济效益的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(5):31-38. |
XIE W Y, ZHOU H P, YANG Z X, et al.. Effects of different ratios of controlled-release urea and common urea on yield, nitrogen utilization and economic benefit of spring maize [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2020, 38(5):31-38. | |
26 | 魏廷邦,胡发龙,赵财,等.氮肥后移对绿洲灌区玉米干物质积累和产量构成的调控效应[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(15):2916-2927. |
WEI T B, HU F L, ZHAO C, et al.. Response of dry matter accumulation and yield components of maize under N-fertilizer postponing application in oasis irrigation areas [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(15):2916-2927. | |
27 | 吕鹏,张吉旺,刘伟,等.施氮时期对高产夏玉米氮代谢关键酶活性及抗氧化特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(6):1591-1598. |
LV P, ZHANG J W, LIU W, et al.. Effect of nitrogen application period on the nitrogen metabolism key enzymes activities and antioxidant characteristics of high-yielding summer maize [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2012, 23(6):1591-1598. | |
28 | 马伯威,王红光,李东晓,等.水氮运筹模式对冬小麦产量和水氮生产效率的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2015,35(8):1141-1147. |
MA B W, WANG H G, LI D X, et al.. Influence of water-nitrogen patterns on yield and productive efficiency of water and nitrogen of winter wheat [J]. J Triticeae Crops, 2015, 35(8):1141-1147. | |
29 | 腾圆圆,赵财,柴强,等.氮肥后移对玉米间作豌豆耗水特性的调控效应[J].作物学报,2016,42(3):446-455. |
TENG Y Y, ZHAO C, CHAI Q, et al.. Effects of postponing nitrogen topdressing on water use characteristics of maize-pea intercropping system [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2016, 42(3):446-455. | |
30 | 翟丙年,李生秀.不同水分状况下施氮对夏玉米水分利用效率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(4):473-480. |
ZHAI B N, LI S X. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on summer maize water use efficiency under different status of soil moisture [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2005, 11(4):473-480. | |
31 | 司东霞,崔振岭,陈新平,等.不同控释氮肥对夏玉米同化物积累及氮平衡的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1745-1752. |
SI D X, CUI Z L, CHEN X P, et al.. Effects of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer application on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen balance of summer maize [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2014, 25(6):1745-1752. | |
32 | 于飞,施卫明.近10年中国大陆主要粮食作物氮肥利用率分析[J].土壤学报,2015,52(6):1311-1324. |
YU F, SHI W M. Nitrogen use efficiencies of major grain crops in China in recent 10 years [J]. Acta Pedol. Sin., 2015,52(6):1311-1324. | |
33 | 姬景红,李玉影,刘双全,等.控释氮肥对春玉米产量、氮效率及氮素平衡的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2017,34(2):153-160. |
JI J H, LI Y Y, LIU S Q, et al.. Effects of controlled-release urea on grain yield of spring maize, nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen balance [J]. J. Agric. Res. Environ., 2017, 34(2):153-160. | |
34 | 刘红恩,李金峰,刘世亮,等.施用控释BB肥对冬小麦产量、氮素累积和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 西北农业学报,2017,26(9):1311-1316. |
LIU H E, LI J F, LIU S L, et al.. Effects of release-controlled bulk blending fertilizer on grain yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization efficiency in winter wheat [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2017, 26(9):1311-1316. |
[1] | 王鑫, 张玉霞, 陈卫东, 林聪颖, 候文慧, 斯日古楞, 丛百明. 追施氮肥对不同饲用燕麦品种产量及光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 170-179. |
[2] | 刘辉, 江解增, 张昊, 张永仙, 钱佳宇, 李东昇, 吕艳, 吴桓锐. 浅水土表覆盖秸秆对缓解土壤盐渍化及水生蔬菜生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 202-208. |
[3] | 易媛, 张会云, 刘立伟, 王静, 朱雪成, 赵娜, 冯国华. 活性腐殖酸缓释肥替代尿素对徐麦新品种产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 144-153. |
[4] | 齐天明, 李志坚, 秦培友, 任贵兴, 周帮伟. 藜麦栽培技术研究与应用展望[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 157-165. |
[5] | 董林林, 查金芳, 沈明星, 王海候, 施林林, 陶玥玥, 周新伟, 陆长婴. 长期秸秆还田对稻麦轮作区土壤有机碳组分构成的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 166-175. |
[6] | 何振嘉, 范王涛, 杜宜春, 王启龙. 基于土体有机重构的水肥耦合对土壤理化性质和水稻产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 176-185. |
[7] | 钟鹏, 苗丽丽, 刘杰, 王建丽, 陆海燕, 于洪久, 张楠. 种植密度和方式对油莎豆群体结构和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 186-196. |
[8] | 董云萍, 龙宇宙, 林兴军, 莫丽珍, 朱华康, 赵青云, 孙燕. 不同施肥量对小粒咖啡产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 197-203. |
[9] | 包奇军, 潘永东, 张华瑜, 柳小宁, 张东佳, 赵锋, 牛小霞, 陈军. 甘肃与欧洲、北美啤酒大麦品种农艺及品质性状比较分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 57-66. |
[10] | 许鑫, 马兆务, 熊淑萍, 马新明, 程涛, 李海洋, 赵锦鹏. 基于气候年型的河南省冬小麦产量预测[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 136-144. |
[11] | 李宝石, 刘文科, 王奇, 邵明杰. 起垄内嵌基质栽培对日光温室夏季黄瓜根区温度、生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 177-183. |
[12] | 周旋, 杨嫔玲, 彭建伟, 柴慧清, 钟雪梅, 康兴蓉, 龙俊佑, 张慧茹. 功能菌型复合肥减施对结球甘蓝产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 184-192. |
[13] | 陈昌婕, 马琳, 苗玉焕, 郭兰萍, 刘大会. 施用钾肥对蕲春蕲艾产量、出绒率及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 201-209. |
[14] | 王健, 许爱玲, 卫晓东, 席吉龙, 杨娜, 王珂, 席天元, 张建诚. 运城盆地不同播期小麦春季冻害风险评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(1): 137-147. |
[15] | 王志丹, 刘吉利, 吴娜. 粉垄耕作对甜高粱光合生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(1): 148-156. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||