Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 182-188.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0305
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Ruiting JIA1,2(), Limin YUAN1,2, Zhongju MENG3(
)
Received:
2022-04-14
Accepted:
2022-06-30
Online:
2023-10-15
Published:
2023-10-27
Contact:
Zhongju MENG
通讯作者:
蒙仲举
作者简介:
贾瑞庭 E-mail:jiaruiting@126.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Ruiting JIA, Limin YUAN, Zhongju MENG. Effects of Plant Measures on Soil Improvement of Desert Photovoltaic Power Station[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 182-188.
贾瑞庭, 袁立敏, 蒙仲举. 植物措施对沙漠光伏电站土壤的改良效应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(10): 182-188.
经营措施 Business measure | 种植时间 Planting time | 盖度 Coverage/% | 株高 Plant height/cm | 冠幅 Crown width/(cm×cm) | 其他物种 Other plant species | 结皮厚度 Soil crust/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
羊草 Leymus chinensis | 2016 | 8 | 63 | 1.46 | ||
甘草 Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 2016 | 40 | 11 | 雾滨黎、沙米 Bassia dasyphylla,Agriophyllum squarrosum | 1.32 | |
油蒿 Artemisia ordosica | 2016 | 6 | 145 | 150×132 | 沙米Agriophyllum squarrosum | |
花棒 Hedysarum scoparium | 2016 | 75 | 131 | 91×80 | 杨柴、柠条、沙打旺Corethrodendron fruticosum var,Caragana korshinskii,Astragalus laxmannii | 1.27 |
沙障 Sand barrier | 2019 |
Table 1 Basic characteristics of areas with different management measures
经营措施 Business measure | 种植时间 Planting time | 盖度 Coverage/% | 株高 Plant height/cm | 冠幅 Crown width/(cm×cm) | 其他物种 Other plant species | 结皮厚度 Soil crust/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
羊草 Leymus chinensis | 2016 | 8 | 63 | 1.46 | ||
甘草 Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 2016 | 40 | 11 | 雾滨黎、沙米 Bassia dasyphylla,Agriophyllum squarrosum | 1.32 | |
油蒿 Artemisia ordosica | 2016 | 6 | 145 | 150×132 | 沙米Agriophyllum squarrosum | |
花棒 Hedysarum scoparium | 2016 | 75 | 131 | 91×80 | 杨柴、柠条、沙打旺Corethrodendron fruticosum var,Caragana korshinskii,Astragalus laxmannii | 1.27 |
沙障 Sand barrier | 2019 |
经营措施 Business measures | 极粗沙 Very coarse sand | 粗沙 Coarse sand | 中沙 Medium sand | 细沙 Fine sand | 极细沙 Very finesand | 黏粉粒 Sticky powder |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
羊草 Leymus chinensis | 0.23±0.05 c | 0.76±0.06 c | 1.96±0.01 e | 76.04±0.19 d | 18.30±0.21 a | 2.71±0.06 b |
甘草 Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 1.03±0.04 a | 5.57±0.03 a | 7.86 ±0.19 d | 72.37±0.13 e | 9.96±0.14 b | 3.22±0.01 a |
油蒿 Artemisia ordosica | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.01±0.01 d | 9.78±0.90 c | 85.64±0.86 a | 4.31±0.04 c | 0.27±0.03 d |
花棒 Hedysarum scoparium | 0.32±0.01 b | 0.96±0.01 b | 11.39±0.97 b | 82.27±0.56 c | 3.53±0.31 d | 1.53±0.14 c |
沙障 Sand barrier | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.01±0.00 d | 13.89±0.22 a | 83.46±0.22 b | 2.47±0.16 e | 0.17±0.03 d |
Table 2 Soil particle size content of different management measures
经营措施 Business measures | 极粗沙 Very coarse sand | 粗沙 Coarse sand | 中沙 Medium sand | 细沙 Fine sand | 极细沙 Very finesand | 黏粉粒 Sticky powder |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
羊草 Leymus chinensis | 0.23±0.05 c | 0.76±0.06 c | 1.96±0.01 e | 76.04±0.19 d | 18.30±0.21 a | 2.71±0.06 b |
甘草 Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 1.03±0.04 a | 5.57±0.03 a | 7.86 ±0.19 d | 72.37±0.13 e | 9.96±0.14 b | 3.22±0.01 a |
油蒿 Artemisia ordosica | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.01±0.01 d | 9.78±0.90 c | 85.64±0.86 a | 4.31±0.04 c | 0.27±0.03 d |
花棒 Hedysarum scoparium | 0.32±0.01 b | 0.96±0.01 b | 11.39±0.97 b | 82.27±0.56 c | 3.53±0.31 d | 1.53±0.14 c |
沙障 Sand barrier | 0.00±0.00 d | 0.01±0.00 d | 13.89±0.22 a | 83.46±0.22 b | 2.47±0.16 e | 0.17±0.03 d |
土层深度 Soil depth/cm | 羊草 Leymus chinensis | 甘草 Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 油蒿 Artemisia ordosica | 花棒 Hedysarm scopariu | 沙障 Sand barrier |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—5 | 1.61 a | 1.57 a | 1.57 a | 1.61 a | 1.56 a |
5—10 | 1.66 a | 1.56 b | 1.54 b | 1.57 b | 1.47 c |
10—20 | 1.62 a | 1.63 a | 1.65 a | 1.59 ab | 1.51 b |
20—30 | 1.59 a | 1.59 a | 1.67 a | 1.58 a | 1.57 a |
Table 3 Soil bulk density of different management measures
土层深度 Soil depth/cm | 羊草 Leymus chinensis | 甘草 Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 油蒿 Artemisia ordosica | 花棒 Hedysarm scopariu | 沙障 Sand barrier |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0—5 | 1.61 a | 1.57 a | 1.57 a | 1.61 a | 1.56 a |
5—10 | 1.66 a | 1.56 b | 1.54 b | 1.57 b | 1.47 c |
10—20 | 1.62 a | 1.63 a | 1.65 a | 1.59 ab | 1.51 b |
20—30 | 1.59 a | 1.59 a | 1.67 a | 1.58 a | 1.57 a |
Fig. 2 Soil porosity of different management measuresNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different management measures at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Soil nutrients of different management measuresNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different management measures at P<0.05 level.
1 | 苗青青,石春艳,张香平.碳中和目标下的光伏发电技术[J].化工进展,2022,41(3):1125-1131. |
MIAO Q Q, SHI C Y, ZHANG X P. Photovoltaic technology under carbon neutrality [J]. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog., 2022,41(3):1125-1131. | |
2 | 唐国栋,蒙仲举,高永,等.沙区光伏阵列对近地层风沙输移的干扰效应[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(13):101-110. |
TANG G D, MENG Z J, GAO Y, et al.. Interference effect of solar photovoltaic array on near surface aeolian sand transport in sandy areas [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2021, 37(13): 101-110. | |
3 | 王祯仪,汪季,高永,等.光伏电站建设对沙区生态环境的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):191-196. |
WANG Z Y, WANG J, GAO Y, et al.. Impacts of photovoltaic power station construction on ecology environment in sandy area [J]. Bull. Soil Water Conserv., 2019,39(1):191-196. | |
4 | 袁方,张振师,卜崇峰,等.毛乌素沙地光伏电站项目区风速流场及风蚀防治措施[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(2):287-294. |
YUAN F, ZHANG Z S, BU C F, et al.. Wind speed flow field and wind erosion control measures at photovoltaic power plant project area in Mu Us sandy land [J]. J. Desert Res., 2016, 36(2): 287-294. | |
5 | 郭彩贇,韩致文,李爱敏,等.库布齐沙漠110MW光伏基地次生风沙危害的动力学机制[J].中国沙漠, 2018,38(2):225-232. |
GUO C Y, HAN Z W, LI A M, et al.. Dynamic mechanism research on the secondary blown sand disaster in the 110 MW photovoltaic arrays of the hobq desert [J]. J. Desert Res., 2018,38(2):225-232. | |
6 | 唐国栋.沙区光伏阵列地表形变规律及其动力学机制[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2021. |
TANG G D. Study on the solar photovoltaic array surface geomorphology development characteristics and dynamic mechanism in desert area [D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2021. | |
7 | 杨世荣.库布齐沙漠光伏电站风沙运动及蚀积特征研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019. |
YANG S R. Study on wind-blown movement and erosion characteristics of kubuqi desert photovoltaic power station [D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019. | |
8 | 石涛.光伏电站芦苇沙障防风固沙效益研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2020. |
SHI T. Study on wind-prevention and sand-fixing benefits of reed sand barrier in the photovoltaic plant [D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2020. | |
9 | 袁方.西北风沙区光伏电站施工迹地工程措施的风蚀防治效益及其机理研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016. |
YUAN F. Study of the effectiveness and mechanism of wind Erosion control of engineering measures of photovoltaic constructing land in northwest sandstorm area [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2016. | |
10 | 肖南,董治宝,南维鸽,等.1957—2014年库布齐沙漠地面风场特征[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(3):628-636. |
XIAO N, DONG Z B, NAN W G, et al.. Characteristics of surface wind field in the Hobq desert from 1957 to 2014 [J]. J. Desert Res., 2018,38(3):628-636. | |
11 | 高广磊,丁国栋,赵媛媛,等.生物结皮发育对毛乌素沙地土壤粒度特征的影响[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(1):115-120. |
GAO G L, DING G D, ZHAO Y Y, et al.. Effects of biological soil crusts on soil particle size characteristics in Mu US Sandland [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2014,45(1):115-120. | |
12 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:1-495. |
13 | 黄博.毛乌素沙地东南缘典型植物群落下土壤理化性质分析[D].西安:西安科技大学,2020. |
HUANG B. Analysis of soil physical and chemical properties under typical plant communities in the southeast of mu us sandy land [D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2020. | |
14 | 沙国良,魏天兴,陈宇轩,等.黄土高原丘陵区典型植物群落土壤粒径分布特征[J].干旱区地理,2022, 45(4):1224 -1234. |
SHA G L, WEI T X, CHEN Y X, et al.. Characteristics of soil particle size distribution of typical plant communities on the hilly areas of Loess Plateau [J]. Arid Land Geogr., 2022, 45(4):1224 -1234 . | |
15 | 杨世荣,蒙仲举,党晓宏,等.库布齐沙漠生态光伏电站不同覆盖类型下土壤粒度特征[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):112-118. |
YANG S R, MENG Z J, DANG X H, et al.. Grain size characteristics of surface sediments of Eco-Photovoltaic power station in Kubuqi desert [J]. Res. Soil Water Conserv., 2020,27(1):112-118. | |
16 | 毛丽,苏志珠,王国玲,等.毛乌素沙地不同土地利用类型的土壤粒度及有机质特征[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(3):589-598. |
MAO L, SU Z Z, WANG G L, et al.. Soil particle size and organic matter content of different land use types in the Mu Us sandland [J]. Arid Zone Res., 2019,36(3):589-598. | |
17 | 陈闻,杨晶晶,袁媛,等.毛乌素沙地人工固沙植被的土壤养分效应[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(6):1447-1456. |
CHEN W, YANG J J, YUAN Y, et al.. Effects of artificial sand-fixing vegetation on soil nutrients in Mu Us sandy land [J]. Arid Zone Res., 2020,37(6):1447-1456. | |
18 | 程洪,谢涛,唐春,等.植物根系力学与固土作用机理研究综述[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(1):97-102. |
CHENG H, XIE T, TANG C, et al.. Overview of mechanism of plant roots improving soil reinforcement and slope stabilization [J]. Bull. Soil Water Conserv., 2006, 26(1):97-102. | |
19 | 徐永刚,马强,周桦,等.秸秆还田与深松对土壤理化性状和玉米产量的影响[J].土壤通报,2015,46(2):428-432. |
XU Y G, MA Q, ZHOU Y, et al.. Effects of straw returning and deep loosening on soil physical and chemical properties and maize yields [J]. Soil Bull.,2015,46(2):428-432. | |
20 | 何丽娟,蒙仲举,党晓宏,等.种植甘草对风沙土机械组成与养分的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2022,24(2):169-176. |
HE L J, MENG Z J, DANG X H, et al.. Effects of planting glycyrrhiza uralensis on mechanical composition and nutrients of aeolian sandy soil [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol.,2022,24(2):169-176. | |
21 | 施明,王锐,孙权,等.腾格里沙漠边缘区植被恢复与土壤养分变化研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):107-111. |
SHI M, WANG R, SUN Q, et al.. Vegetation restoration and soil nutrient changes in edge of tengger desert [J]. Bull. Soil Water Conserv., 2013,33(6):107-111. |
[1] | Chenyang ZHANG, Minggang XU, Fei WANG, Ran LI, Nan SUN. Effects of Manure Application on Soybean Yield and Soil Nutrients in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 148-156. |
[2] | Caiyan DU, Haiyan LU, Yanzhu XIONG, Xi SUN, Xiumei SUN, Jixiong PU, Naiming ZHANG. Effects of Combined Application of Biogas Slurry and Chemical Fertilizer on Peach Growth and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties for Two Consecutive Years [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 165-175. |
[3] | Rui XIAO, Lu TAN, Liang WU, Hao ZHANG, Jiayuan GUO, Haijun YANG. Microbial Community Structure and Diversity in Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soil of Kochia scoparia Under Cd Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 203-215. |
[4] | Jia YAO, Jiaxin LIU, Yan SU, Xiaojuan SU. Effects of Combined Application of Tobacco Stem Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizers on Corn Growth and Soil Properties in Seeding Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 140-151. |
[5] | Tingting NIE, Yiqiang DONG, Helong YANG, Asitaiken Julihaiti, Shijie ZHOU, Shazhou AN. Effects of Enclosure on Plant and Soil Stoichiometric Characteristics in an Artemisia Desert [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 178-187. |
[6] | Yunzhu ZHENG, Shuchen SUN. Effects of Straw Biochar and Straw on Soil Nutrients and Crop Yield in Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 152-162. |
[7] | Chuang LU, Haitang HU, Yuan QIN, Heju HUAI, Cunjun LI. Delineating Management Zones in Spring Maize Field Based on UAV Multispectral Image [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 106-115. |
[8] | Kuiyuan CHEN, Hui LIU, Wei DING. Effect of Glyphosate on Soil Nutrient and the Functional Enzyme Activities in Soybean Fields [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 180-188. |
[9] | Zhenjia HE, Wangtao FAN, Yichun DU, Qilong WANG. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Rice Soil and Yield Based on Soil Organic Reconstruction [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 176-185. |
[10] | Lijuan HE, Zhongju MENG, Xiaohong DANG, Tao LYU. Effects of Planting Glycyrrhizauralensis on Mechanical Composition and Nutrients of Aeolian Sandy Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 169-176. |
[11] | Zhuwen LIU, Longfei YANG, Maolin LIU, Guotao JIA, Qian YAO, Yiqiong MA, Ting CUI, Xinling YANG, Yang CHEN, Liangkun CHENG. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Nutrients and Inherent Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(11): 190-198. |
[12] | LIU Yuanbo, WANG Jing, Zhu Xuejie, JIANG Weifeng, LIU Tian, ZHANG Jinzhong, LI Yaoxin, FU Yunpeng. Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Management Modes on Nutrient Accumulation and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 193-201. |
[13] | PU Quanming1, YANG Peng1*, DENG Yuchuan2, XIANG Chengyong1, LIN Bangmin1, LIU Lisha1, SHI Songmei3, HE Zemin1, YONG Lei1. Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Soil Enzyme Activity, Soil Nutrients and Quality of Spring Cabbage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(7): 130-139. |
[14] | XI Xiaobo, SUN Fuhua, ZHANG Yifu, SHAN Xiang, ZHANG Qi, JIN Yifu, ZHANG Ruihong*. Study on Optimization of Puffing Parameters of Floating Aquatic Feed [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(12): 88-96. |
[15] | ZHOU Xiaoyu, PANG Xuesi, GUO Yanzhi, SUN Junmao*. Change of Food Consumption Structure in Japan and Its Enlightenment on China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 80-85. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||