Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 81-89.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0583
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xinxin WANG(), Ziwei WU, Ting FANG, Qiao MOU, Fang WANG, Han ZHAO, Zhiqiang DU, Caixia YANG(
)
Received:
2024-07-23
Accepted:
2024-10-31
Online:
2025-05-15
Published:
2025-05-20
Contact:
Caixia YANG
王昕昕(), 吴子薇, 方婷, 牟巧, 王芳, 赵晗, 杜志强, 杨彩侠(
)
通讯作者:
杨彩侠
作者简介:
王昕昕 E-mail:wxx_wang_xinxin@163.com;
CLC Number:
Xinxin WANG, Ziwei WU, Ting FANG, Qiao MOU, Fang WANG, Han ZHAO, Zhiqiang DU, Caixia YANG. Vitamin C Modulates Function and Gene Expression of Mouse TM4 Sertoli Cells[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 81-89.
王昕昕, 吴子薇, 方婷, 牟巧, 王芳, 赵晗, 杜志强, 杨彩侠. 维生素C调节小鼠TM4支持细胞的功能和基因表达[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 81-89.
基因名称 Gene name | 引物序列 Prime sequence (5’-3’) |
---|---|
Gapdh | F: AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG R: TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA |
Adra1d | F: AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG R: TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA |
Gbp2 | F: CTGCTAAACTTCGGGAACAGGA R: AGAGAGCTTGGCAGAGAGGT |
Inca1 | F: CCAATTCTGAGGGCCACTGAT R: TAACTCGGGCTGGAATGCTT |
Mapkapk5 | F: GCTGATGATGGATAAGGCGGT R: TACCGTCCTTTGGCTTGGTG |
Nos3 | F: R: |
Npas4 | F: R: |
Scand1 | F: CGGGTCGAGACGCAGG R: GTAGGGCGCCGTGTTCAAA |
Tmem30c | F: AACTGTACCGCCGACTGAAG R: CCCCCGTCACTGTGTAAGTC |
Trim34a | R: |
Table 1 Primer sequences for RT-qPCR
基因名称 Gene name | 引物序列 Prime sequence (5’-3’) |
---|---|
Gapdh | F: AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG R: TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA |
Adra1d | F: AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG R: TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA |
Gbp2 | F: CTGCTAAACTTCGGGAACAGGA R: AGAGAGCTTGGCAGAGAGGT |
Inca1 | F: CCAATTCTGAGGGCCACTGAT R: TAACTCGGGCTGGAATGCTT |
Mapkapk5 | F: GCTGATGATGGATAAGGCGGT R: TACCGTCCTTTGGCTTGGTG |
Nos3 | F: R: |
Npas4 | F: R: |
Scand1 | F: CGGGTCGAGACGCAGG R: GTAGGGCGCCGTGTTCAAA |
Tmem30c | F: AACTGTACCGCCGACTGAAG R: CCCCCGTCACTGTGTAAGTC |
Trim34a | R: |
Fig. 1 Effects of AA2P on the viability, proliferation and apoptosis of mouse TM4 cellsA: Representative plots of TM4 cells treated with different AA2P treatments for different time with scale bar 100 μm; B: Cell viability; C: Representative images of EdU assay with scale bar 20 and 50 μm; D: Representative images of Annexin V assay with scale bar 50 μm; E: Proliferation rate of cell; F: Apoptosis rate of cell. *, ** and *** indicate significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 levels, respectively
Fig. 2 ROS level and mitochondrial features of mouse TM4 cells treated by AA2PA~C: Representative images of ROS, MitoTracker and RH123 staining with scale bar 50 μm; D~F: Relative fluorescence intensities of ROS, MitoTracker and RH123 staining. * and ** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively
Fig. 3 Global levels of nucleic acid m6A methylation and histone H3 trimethylation at sites of lysine 4, 9 and 36 in mouse TM4 cells treated by AA2PA, C, E, G: Immunofluorescence staining represents images with scale bar 20 μm; B, D, F, H: Histogram of relative fluorescence intensity. * and ** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.001 levels, respectively
Fig. 4 Levels of hormones and lactate in mouse TM4 cells treated by AA2PNote:* and ** indicate significant differences at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively.
Fig. 5 RNA-seq identified genes and molecular pathways altered by AA2P treatment of mouse TM4 cellsA: Number of DEGs; B: Heatmap of DEGs; C: Significantly enriched GO term; D: Partial DEGs involved in some key GO terms; E: Significantly enriched KEGG signaling pathways
Fig. 6 Validation of selected DEGsA: Expression and difference of DEGs as detected by RNA-seq; B: Validation of expression and difference of DEGs by RT-qPCR. *, ** and *** indicate significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 levels, respectively
1 | REIS M M S, MOREIRA A C, SOUSA M, et al.. Sertoli cell as a model in male reproductive toxicology: advantages and disadvantages [J]. J. Appl. Toxicol., 2015, 35(8): 870-883. |
2 | MATHER J P, ZHUANG L Z, PEREZ-INFANTE V, et al.. Culture of testicular cells in hormone-supplemented serum-free medium [J]. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1982, 383: 44-68. |
3 | AGUIRRE-ARIAS M V, VELARDE V, MORENO R D. Effects of ascorbic acid on spermatogenesis and sperm parameters in diabetic rats [J]. Cell Tissue Res., 2017, 370(2): 305-317. |
4 | SADEGHZADEH F, MEHRANJANI M S, MAHMOODI M. Vitamin C ameliorates the adverse effects of dexamethasone on sperm motility, testosterone level, and spermatogenesis indexes in mice [J]. Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 2019, 38(4): 409-418. |
5 | EIDAN S M. Effect on post-cryopreserved semen characteristics of Holstein bulls of adding combinations of vitamin C and either catalase or reduced glutathione to tris extender [J]. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 2016, 167: 1-7. |
6 | YU X X, LIU Y H, LIU X M, et al.. Ascorbic acid induces global epigenetic reprogramming to promote meiotic maturation and developmental competence of porcine oocytes [J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8(1): 6132 [2024-06-20]. . |
7 | YANG Y W, CHEN L, MOU Q, et al.. Ascorbic acid promotes the reproductive function of porcine immature sertoli cells through transcriptome reprogramming [J]. Theriogenology, 2020, 158: 309-320. |
8 | YANG C X, YANG Y W, MOU Q, et al.. Global change of microRNA expression induced by vitamin C treatment on immature boar Sertoli cells [J]. Theriogenology, 2022, 183: 1-9. |
9 | YANG C X, YANG Y W, MOU Q, et al.. Proteomic changes induced by ascorbic acid treatment on porcine immature Sertoli cells [J]. Theriogenology, 2022, 188: 13-21. |
10 | MOU Q, YANG Y W, CHEN L, et al.. Melatonin mitigates chloroquine-induced defects in porcine immature sertoli cells [J]. Theriogenology, 2022, 177: 1-10. |
11 | LYKKESFELDT J, MICHELS A J, FREI B. Vitamin C [J]. Adv. Nutr., 2014, 5: 16-18. |
12 | ANGULO C, MALDONADO R, PULGAR E, et al.. Vitamin C and oxidative stress in the seminiferous epithelium [J]. Biol. Res., 2011, 44(2): 169-180. |
13 | ZHANG B, PAN C, FENG C, et al.. Role of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in homeostasis regulation [J]. Redox Rep., 2022, 27(1): 45-52. |
14 | GAUTAM M, BHATTACHARYA I, RAI U, et al.. Hormone induced differential transcriptome analysis of sertoli cells during postnatal maturation of rat testes [J/OL]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(1): e0191201 [2024-06-20]. . |
[1] | Shuo SHI, Yu FENG, Liang LI, Rui MENG, Yanze ZHANG, Xiurong YANG. Transcriptome Analysis of Resistance to Sharp Eyespot of Wheat Mediated by Piriformospora indica and Key Genes Screening [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 133-145. |
[2] | Qian ZHANG, Lina MEN, Yiran LI, Qiao LIU, Angie DENG, Xiaowen HU, Yuhong ZHANG, Zhiwei ZHANG, Wei ZHANG. Differential Expression Paradigm of Chemoreceptor Genes Between Males and Females at Different Developmental Stages of Carposina sasakii Matsumura [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 151-162. |
[3] | Yiwei LU, Xueyan XIA, Yu ZHAO, Jihan CUI, Meng LIU, Meihong HUANG, Cheng CHU, Jianjun LIU, Shunguo LI. Transcriptome Profiling and Gene Mining of Millet Response to Potassium Deficiency Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 30-44. |
[4] | Jiarui XU, Yiru WANG, Shaogeng ZHAO, Kun LI, Jun ZHENG. Functional Study and Transcriptome Analysis of Corn Gene ZmCCoAOMT1 Involved in Lignin Synthesis Pathway [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 30-43. |
[5] | Shuang LI, Aiying WANG, Zhen JIAO, Qing CHI, Hao SUN, Tao JIAO. Physiological and Chemical Characteristics and Transcriptome Analysis of Different Type of Wheat Seedlings Under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 20-32. |
[6] | Zhan ZHAO, Xiaoting WANG, Lifeng ZHANG, Jinhe ZHAO, Yuhong YU, Junhua LI, Zhanqing WU. Transcriptome Analysis of Watermelon Responses to Low Nitrogen Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(12): 30-38. |
[7] | Wei JI, Ying FAN, Jiaxing HUANG, Huipeng YANG, Jin XU, Xiaoying LI, Yueqin GUO, Yueguo WU, Jilian LI, Jun YAO. Transcriptome Analysis of Stigma Response Mechanism of Blueberry with Different Pollination Intensity [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 71-82. |
[8] | Wanjing XU, Fang PENG, Doudou ZHAO, Jiaojiao LUO, Shan TAO, Hailang LIAO, Changqing MAO, Yu WU, Xiu ZHU, Zhengjun XU, Chao ZHANG. Analysis of Response Mechanism of Ligusticum chuanxiong to Cadmium Stress Based on Transcriptome and Metabolome [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(10): 98-109. |
[9] | Xiangwu LI, Ziyang LIU, Yujun XU, Jianbo ZHU, Yanmin WU. Explore of Molecular Mechanism on Fungal Elicitors Regulating Shikonin Synthesis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 78-88. |
[10] | Xiaoran WANG, Xiaoyu LI, Hui SUN, Haidong YU, Yongchun SHI. Transcriptome Analysis of Tobacco Leaves Under Boron Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 53-64. |
[11] | Yunsheng WANG, Yincui CHEN, Zai CHENG, Jin ZHANG, Chuanbo ZHANG. Effects of Overexpression of veA Gene on Secondary Metabolism of Eurotium cristatus [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 77-86. |
[12] | Yuqing ZHOU, Yongfei YANG, Changwei GE, Qian SHEN, Siping ZHANG, Shaodong LIU, Huijuan MA, Jing CHEN, Ruihua LIU, Shicong LI, Xinhua ZHAO, Cundong LI, Chaoyou PANG. Identification of Cold-related Co-expression Modules in Cotton Cotyledon by WGCNA [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 52-62. |
[13] | LI Shuxin, ZHANG Hao, ZHENG Housheng, ZHENG Peihe, PANG Shifeng, XU Shiquan. Transcriptome Analysis of Phenotypic Differences Between Ermaya and Changbo of Forest Cultivated Panax ginseng [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 56-68. |
[14] | LIU Yuan, ZHANG Xiuyan, XU Miaoyun, ZHENG Hongyan, ZOU Junjie, ZHANG Lan, WANG Lei. Global Small RNA Transcriptome Profiling of Rice Under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 23-32. |
[15] | ZHANG Wenyun1, ZHANG Jiancheng2, YAO Jingzhen2*. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Wheat Leaf in Response to Low Nitrogen Stress#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 26-34. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||