Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 156-165.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0200
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Yi DANG(), Jianjun ZHANG(), Gang ZHAO, Tinglu FAN, Lei WANG, Shangzhong LI, Gang ZHOU
Received:
2021-03-11
Accepted:
2021-07-07
Online:
2022-06-15
Published:
2022-06-21
Contact:
Jianjun ZHANG
党翼(), 张建军(), 赵刚, 樊廷录, 王磊, 李尚中, 周刚
通讯作者:
张建军
作者简介:
党翼 E-mail:22126670@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Yi DANG, Jianjun ZHANG, Gang ZHAO, Tinglu FAN, Lei WANG, Shangzhong LI, Gang ZHOU. Effects of Mixed Applying of Controlled-release Urea and Conventional Urea on Yield,Water and Nitrogen Utilization of Maize in Dryland[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 156-165.
党翼, 张建军, 赵刚, 樊廷录, 王磊, 李尚中, 周刚. 控释尿素和普通尿素配施对旱地玉米产量和水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 156-165.
Fig. 2 SPAD value of leaf at different stages under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
Fig 3 Dry matter accumulation per plant at different stages under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Dry matter accumulation per plant at pre?flowering and post?flowering under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 播种-苗期 Sowing-seeding | 苗期-拔节期 Seeding-jointing | 拔节期-抽雄期 Jointing-tasseling | 抽雄期-灌浆期 Tasseling-filling | 灌浆期-收获期 Filling-harvesting | 全生育期 Whole stage | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | |
CK1 | 16.6±1.4 c | 50.5 | 81.6±2.4 ab | 23.1 | 148.5±4.2 b | 183 | 81.5±6.6 ab | 158.3 | 57.1±4.7 c | 35.3 | 385.3±6.9 c |
CK2 | 20.8±2.3 bc | 50.5 | 68.9±5.9 bc | 23.1 | 157.5±4.6 ab | 183 | 92.9±5.5 a | 158.3 | 52.2±1.2 c | 35.3 | 392.2±8.2 c |
CK3 | 24.4±3.9 abc | 50.5 | 61.7±4.6 c | 23.1 | 168.1±8.4 ab | 183 | 83.1±4.4 ab | 158.3 | 50.3±1.9 c | 35.3 | 387.7±8.9 c |
T1 | 30.1±1.3 a | 50.5 | 75.4±7.0 abc | 23.1 | 161.7±7.0 ab | 183 | 80.0±8.6 ab | 158.3 | 50.2±7.7 c | 35.3 | 397.5±8.7 bc |
T2 | 23.1±9.1 abc | 50.5 | 82.8±2.6 ab | 23.1 | 170.1±12.6 a | 183 | 76.5±6.8 ab | 158.3 | 72.9±2.6 b | 35.3 | 425.5±8.6 ab |
T3 | 25.7±6.7 ab | 50.5 | 91.1±6.3 a | 23.1 | 176.3±14.4 a | 183 | 68.1±5.0 b | 158.3 | 80.8±4.0 a | 35.3 | 442.2±8.9 a |
Table 1 Water consumption at different stages under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 播种-苗期 Sowing-seeding | 苗期-拔节期 Seeding-jointing | 拔节期-抽雄期 Jointing-tasseling | 抽雄期-灌浆期 Tasseling-filling | 灌浆期-收获期 Filling-harvesting | 全生育期 Whole stage | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | 降雨量 Rainfall | 耗水量 ET | |
CK1 | 16.6±1.4 c | 50.5 | 81.6±2.4 ab | 23.1 | 148.5±4.2 b | 183 | 81.5±6.6 ab | 158.3 | 57.1±4.7 c | 35.3 | 385.3±6.9 c |
CK2 | 20.8±2.3 bc | 50.5 | 68.9±5.9 bc | 23.1 | 157.5±4.6 ab | 183 | 92.9±5.5 a | 158.3 | 52.2±1.2 c | 35.3 | 392.2±8.2 c |
CK3 | 24.4±3.9 abc | 50.5 | 61.7±4.6 c | 23.1 | 168.1±8.4 ab | 183 | 83.1±4.4 ab | 158.3 | 50.3±1.9 c | 35.3 | 387.7±8.9 c |
T1 | 30.1±1.3 a | 50.5 | 75.4±7.0 abc | 23.1 | 161.7±7.0 ab | 183 | 80.0±8.6 ab | 158.3 | 50.2±7.7 c | 35.3 | 397.5±8.7 bc |
T2 | 23.1±9.1 abc | 50.5 | 82.8±2.6 ab | 23.1 | 170.1±12.6 a | 183 | 76.5±6.8 ab | 158.3 | 72.9±2.6 b | 35.3 | 425.5±8.6 ab |
T3 | 25.7±6.7 ab | 50.5 | 91.1±6.3 a | 23.1 | 176.3±14.4 a | 183 | 68.1±5.0 b | 158.3 | 80.8±4.0 a | 35.3 | 442.2±8.9 a |
Fig. 5 Water consumption in pre?flowering and post?flowering under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 水分利用效率 WUE/(kg·hm-2·mm-1) | 百粒重 100-grain weight/g | 穗粒数 Grain No. per ear |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 11 620.5±460.0 d | 30.15±1.9 c | 29.4±1.7 b | 611.3±16.6 c |
CK2 | 12 478.5±473.5 cd | 31.85±2.1 bc | 31.6±1.5 ab | 630.4±21.9 bc |
CK3 | 13 314.0±216.6 bc | 34.35±1.8 ab | 33.0±2.7 ab | 647.1±25.9 ab |
T1 | 13 354.5±417.9 bc | 33.60±1.5 b | 30.8±1.6 ab | 642.4±17.4 abc |
T2 | 14 166.0±493.3 b | 33.30±0.7 b | 33.2±0.9 ab | 654.8±17.1 ab |
T3 | 16 230.0±400.7 a | 36.70±1.6 a | 34.5±1.7 a | 668.2±19.1 a |
Table 2 Yield characteristic and water use efficiency under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 水分利用效率 WUE/(kg·hm-2·mm-1) | 百粒重 100-grain weight/g | 穗粒数 Grain No. per ear |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK1 | 11 620.5±460.0 d | 30.15±1.9 c | 29.4±1.7 b | 611.3±16.6 c |
CK2 | 12 478.5±473.5 cd | 31.85±2.1 bc | 31.6±1.5 ab | 630.4±21.9 bc |
CK3 | 13 314.0±216.6 bc | 34.35±1.8 ab | 33.0±2.7 ab | 647.1±25.9 ab |
T1 | 13 354.5±417.9 bc | 33.60±1.5 b | 30.8±1.6 ab | 642.4±17.4 abc |
T2 | 14 166.0±493.3 b | 33.30±0.7 b | 33.2±0.9 ab | 654.8±17.1 ab |
T3 | 16 230.0±400.7 a | 36.70±1.6 a | 34.5±1.7 a | 668.2±19.1 a |
Fig. 6 Nitrogen use efficiency under different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
1 | 张在一,毛学峰,杨军.站在变革十字路口的玉米:主粮还是饲料粮之论[J].中国农村经济,2019(6):38-53. |
ZHANG Z Y, MAO X F, YANG J. Maize at the crossroads: Staple food grain or feed grain [J]. Chin. Rural Econ., 2019(6):38-53. | |
2 | 孙多鑫,柴宗文,赵贵宾.甘肃省旱作区玉米生产机械化发展分析与对策[J].农业机械,2019(4):82-84. |
SUN D X, CHAI Z W, ZHAO G B. Development analysis and countermeasures of maize production mechanization in dry farming area of Gansu Province [J]. Agric. Mach., 2019(4):82-84. | |
3 | 刘武仁,郑金玉,罗洋,等.概述氮肥水平对玉米生理及产量性状的影响[J].华北农学报,2010,25(S1):239-242. |
LIU W R, ZHENG J Y, LUO Y, et al.. Research advance on physiological changes respond to level of N application [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2010, 25(S1):239-242. | |
4 | 孙浒,张吉旺,靳立斌.玉米高产与氮肥高效协同实现存在的问题及其途径[J].玉米科学,2014,22(1):143-148. |
SUN H, ZHANG J W, JIN L B. Problems and approaches of achieving high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency in maize production [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2014, 22(1):143-148. | |
5 | 黄东风,王果,李卫华,等.不同施肥模式对蔬菜生长、氮肥利用及采地氮流失的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(3):631-638. |
HUANG D F, WANG G L, WEI H, et al.. Effects of different fertilization modes on vegetable growth, fertlizer nitrogen utilization and nitrogen loss from vegetable field [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2009, 20(3):631-638. | |
6 | 郭萍,朱从桦,査丽,等.缓释尿素与普通尿素不同配比对玉米氮代谢酶和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料.2016(6):99-105. |
GUO P, ZHU C H, ZHA L, et al.. Effects of the combined application of slow-release urea and urea on activities of key enzymes related to nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen utilization of maize [J]. China Soil Fert., 2016(6):99-105. | |
7 | 李敏,武际,韩上,等.控释氮肥拔节期施用对冬小麦产量及干物质、氮素累积与分配的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2017,37(7):955-962. |
LI M, WU J, HAN S, et al.. Effect of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer as jointing fertilizer on yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and distribution in winter wheat [J]. J. Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37(7):955-962. | |
8 | GAO X, LI C, ZHANG M,et al.. Controlled release urea improved the nitrogen use efficiency,yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) on silt loamy soil [J]. Field Crops Res.,2015, 181:60-68. |
9 | YANG Y C, ZHANG M, LI Y C, et al.. Controlled release urea improved nitrogen use efficiency,activities of leaf enzymes, and rice yield [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2012, 76(6):2307-2317. |
10 | 冯小杰,战秀梅,王雪鑫,等.包膜尿素不同配比减施对土壤无机氮含量及玉米氮素吸收的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(10):1733-1745. |
FENG X J, ZHAN X M, WANG X X, et al.. Effects of soil inorganic nitrogen and nitrogen absorbing by maize under the reduced application of coated urea at different proportions [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2019, 52(10):1733-1745. | |
11 | 张建军,党翼,赵刚,等.控释氮肥全量基施对旱地玉米产量形成和水肥利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):170-177. |
ZHANG J J, DANG Y, ZHAO G, et al.. Effects of application of controlled-release nitrogen on yield and waterand fertilizer use efficiencies of maize [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2021, 35(2):170-177. | |
12 | 纪洋,于海洋,徐华.控释肥与尿素配合施用对稻季土壤CH4和N2O 排放的影响[J].生态环境学报,2017,26(9):1494-1500. |
JI Y, YU H Y, XU H. Effect of controlled-release fertilizer and its combined application with urea on CH4 and N2O emissions in rice soil [J]. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 2017, 26(9):1494-1500. | |
13 | 金容,李兰,郭萍,等.控释氮肥比例对土壤氮含量和玉米氮素吸收利用的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):214-221. |
JIN R, LI L, GUO P, et al.. Effect of the mixed ratios of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on soil nitrogen content and its up-take and utilization of maize [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2018, 32(6):214-221. | |
14 | GUO J J, ZHANG F C, WANG H D, et al.. Effects of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer and urea blending on maize growth and nitrogen uptake under different nitrogen application rates [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(20):3930-3943. |
15 | MA B L, DWYER L M. Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids in leaf senescence [J]. Plant Soil, 1998, 19:283-291. |
16 | 刘占军,谢佳贵,张宽,等.不同氮肥管理对吉林春玉米生长发育和养分吸收的影响 [J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(1): 38-47. |
LIU Z J, XIE JG, ZHANG K, et al.. Maize growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by nitrogen management in Jilin Province [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2011, 17(1):38-47. | |
17 | KIMETU J M, LEHMANN J, KRULL E. Stability and stabilisation of biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents [J]. Soil Res., 2010, 48(7):577-585. |
18 | 赵斌,董树亭,张吉旺,等.控释肥对夏玉米产量和氮素积累与分配的影响[J].作物学报,2010,36(10):1760-1768. |
ZHAO B, DONG S T, ZHANG J W, et al.. Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on yield and nitrogen accumulation and distribution in summer maize [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2010, 36(10):1760-1768. | |
19 | 朱红英,董树亭,胡昌浩,等.不同控释肥用量对玉米生产效应的影响[J].玉米科学,2007,15(2):114-116. |
ZHU H Y, DONG S T, HU C H, et al.. Study on different dosages of controlled- release fertilizers in influencing the yield and efficiency of maize [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2007, 15(2):114-116. | |
20 | 梁熠,康建宏,朱荣,等.控释、常规尿素配施对雨养区春玉米产量及氮素利用的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):237-241, 278. |
LIANG Y, KANG J H, ZHU R, et al.. Effect of mixed applying controlled-release urea and conventional urea on yield and nitrogen utilization of spring maize in rain fed region [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2017, 31(6):237-241, 278. | |
21 | ZHENG W K, ZHANG M, LIU Z G, et al.. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system [J]. Field Crops Res., 2016, 197(4):52-62. |
22 | 郭萍,黄科程,李孝东,等.普通、控释尿素配比对玉米物质积累及产量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):191-196. |
GUO P, HUANG K C, LI X D, et al.. Effect of combined application of controlled-released urea and urea on dry matter accumulation and yield of maize [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2017, 31(1):191-196. | |
23 | 朱宝国.控释氮肥对土壤硝态氮和玉米植株全氮含量及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(6):220-223. |
ZHU B G. Effects of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on soil nitrate nitrogen and plant total nitrogen content and yield of corn [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2014, 30(6):220-223. | |
24 | 李前,秦裕波,孔丽丽,等.不同类型的缓/控释肥对玉米氮素吸收及土壤速效氮的影响[J].玉米科学,2017,25(4):123-128. |
LI Q, QIN Y B, KONG L L, et al.. Effects on maize nitrogen uptake and soil available nitrogen of different kinds of slow/controlled release fertilizers [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2017, 25(4):123-128. | |
25 | 解文艳,周怀平,杨振兴,等.控释尿素与普通尿素配施对春玉米产量、氮肥利用及经济效益的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(5):31-38. |
XIE W Y, ZHOU H P, YANG Z X, et al.. Effects of different ratios of controlled-release urea and common urea on yield, nitrogen utilization and economic benefit of spring maize [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2020, 38(5):31-38. | |
26 | 魏廷邦,胡发龙,赵财,等.氮肥后移对绿洲灌区玉米干物质积累和产量构成的调控效应[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(15):2916-2927. |
WEI T B, HU F L, ZHAO C, et al.. Response of dry matter accumulation and yield components of maize under N-fertilizer postponing application in oasis irrigation areas [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(15):2916-2927. | |
27 | 吕鹏,张吉旺,刘伟,等.施氮时期对高产夏玉米氮代谢关键酶活性及抗氧化特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(6):1591-1598. |
LV P, ZHANG J W, LIU W, et al.. Effect of nitrogen application period on the nitrogen metabolism key enzymes activities and antioxidant characteristics of high-yielding summer maize [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2012, 23(6):1591-1598. | |
28 | 马伯威,王红光,李东晓,等.水氮运筹模式对冬小麦产量和水氮生产效率的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2015,35(8):1141-1147. |
MA B W, WANG H G, LI D X, et al.. Influence of water-nitrogen patterns on yield and productive efficiency of water and nitrogen of winter wheat [J]. J Triticeae Crops, 2015, 35(8):1141-1147. | |
29 | 腾圆圆,赵财,柴强,等.氮肥后移对玉米间作豌豆耗水特性的调控效应[J].作物学报,2016,42(3):446-455. |
TENG Y Y, ZHAO C, CHAI Q, et al.. Effects of postponing nitrogen topdressing on water use characteristics of maize-pea intercropping system [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2016, 42(3):446-455. | |
30 | 翟丙年,李生秀.不同水分状况下施氮对夏玉米水分利用效率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(4):473-480. |
ZHAI B N, LI S X. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on summer maize water use efficiency under different status of soil moisture [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2005, 11(4):473-480. | |
31 | 司东霞,崔振岭,陈新平,等.不同控释氮肥对夏玉米同化物积累及氮平衡的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1745-1752. |
SI D X, CUI Z L, CHEN X P, et al.. Effects of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer application on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen balance of summer maize [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2014, 25(6):1745-1752. | |
32 | 于飞,施卫明.近10年中国大陆主要粮食作物氮肥利用率分析[J].土壤学报,2015,52(6):1311-1324. |
YU F, SHI W M. Nitrogen use efficiencies of major grain crops in China in recent 10 years [J]. Acta Pedol. Sin., 2015,52(6):1311-1324. | |
33 | 姬景红,李玉影,刘双全,等.控释氮肥对春玉米产量、氮效率及氮素平衡的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2017,34(2):153-160. |
JI J H, LI Y Y, LIU S Q, et al.. Effects of controlled-release urea on grain yield of spring maize, nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen balance [J]. J. Agric. Res. Environ., 2017, 34(2):153-160. | |
34 | 刘红恩,李金峰,刘世亮,等.施用控释BB肥对冬小麦产量、氮素累积和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 西北农业学报,2017,26(9):1311-1316. |
LIU H E, LI J F, LIU S L, et al.. Effects of release-controlled bulk blending fertilizer on grain yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization efficiency in winter wheat [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2017, 26(9):1311-1316. |
[1] | Yu FENG, Shujin QIU, Xiangyang YUAN, Qingliang CUI, Zhiqiang JI. Research on Compression Mechanical Characteristics of Sorghum Grains [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 102-110. |
[2] | Xin WANG, Yuxia ZHANG, Weidong CHEN, Congying LIN, Wenhui HOU, Guleng SIRI, Baiming CONG. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing on Yield and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Different Forage Oat Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 170-179. |
[3] | Hui LIU, Jiezeng JIANG, Hao ZHANG, Yongxian ZHANG, Jiayu QIAN, Dongsheng LI, Yan LYU, Huanrui WU. Effects of Straw Mulching on Shallow Water Soil on Alleviating Soil Salinization and Growth of Aquatic Vegetables [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 202-208. |
[4] | Yuan YI, Huiyun ZHANG, Liwei LIU, Jing WANG, Xuecheng ZHU, Na ZHAO, Guohua FENG. Effects of Slow-released Fertilizer Compound Humic Acid Instead of Urea on Grain Yield and Population Quality in Xumai New Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 144-153. |
[5] | Tianwei PENG, Huiya XIE, Sijun LI, Yixuan LIU, Kaifeng SHUAI, Yuanyuan PENG, Qing WANG, Diqin LI. Effects of Sodium Dinitrate with Bacillus Sbutilis Complex on Growth and Physiological Indexes of Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 154-161. |
[6] | Tianming QI, Zhijian LI, Peiyou QIN, Guixing REN, Bangwei ZHOU. Research and Application Prospect of Quinoa Cultivation Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 157-165. |
[7] | Linlin DONG, Jinfang ZHA, Mingxing SHEN, Haihou WANG, Linlin SHI, Yueyue TAO, Xinwei ZHOU, Changying LU. Effect of Long-term Straw Returning on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions Composition in Rice-Wheat Rotation Ecosystem [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 166-175. |
[8] | Zhenjia HE, Wangtao FAN, Yichun DU, Qilong WANG. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Rice Soil and Yield Based on Soil Organic Reconstruction [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 176-185. |
[9] | Peng ZHONG, Lili MIAO, Jie LIU, Jianli WANG, Haiyan LU, Hongjiu YU, Nan ZHANG. Effect of Different Planting Densities and Patterns on Population Structure and Yield of Cyperusesculentus [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 186-196. |
[10] | Yunping DONG, Yuzhou LONG, Xingjun LIN, Lizhen MO, Huakang ZHU, Qingyun ZHAO, Yan SUN. Effect of Different Fertilizer Applications on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of CoffeaArabica L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 197-203. |
[11] | Qijun BAO, Yongdong PAN, Huayu ZHANG, Xiaoning LIU, Dongjia ZHANG, Feng ZHAO, Xiaoxia NIU, Jun CHEN. Analysis of Agronomic and Quality Characters of Beer Barley from Gansu and Europe, North America [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 57-66. |
[12] | Xin XU, Zhaowu MA, Shuping XIONG, Xinming MA, Tao CHENG, Haiyang LI, Jinpeng ZHAO. Wheat Yield Forecast in Henan Province Based on Climate Year Type [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 136-144. |
[13] | Baoshi LI, Wenke LIU, Qi WANG, Mingjie SHAO. Effect of Soil-ridged Substrate-embedded Cultivation on Root Zone Temperature, Growth and Yield of Cucumber in Chinese Solar Greenhouse in Summer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 177-183. |
[14] | Xuan ZHOU, Pinling YANG, Jianwei PENG, Huiqing CHAI, Xuemei ZHONG, Xingrong KANG, Junyou LONG, Huiru ZHANG. Effects of Function Microbial Compound Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of Head Cabbage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 184-192. |
[15] | Changjie CHEN, Lin MA, Yuhuan MIAO, Lanping GUO, Dahui LIU. Effects of Potassium Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Artemisia argyi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 201-209. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||