Effects of Silicon， Calcium， Potassium and Magnesium Fertilizer and Density on Rice Yield Formation

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0681

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to study the effects of silicon， calcium， potassium and magnesium fertilizer and different cultivation densities on the characteristics， material accumulation and yield formation of hybrid rice,‘Jingliangyou 534 ’was used as the test variety. The split plot design was used in the experiment. 2 fertilizer treatments were set up in the main area : no silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer and increasing silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer （G）. 4 transplanting densities were set up in sub-area: 19.3×10⁴（M1）, 16.0×10⁴（M2）, 13.0×10⁴（M3） and 10.0×10⁴ plants·hm^-2（M4）. Through 2 consecutive years of field positioning experiments, the rice yield and composition factors, dry matter accumulation, tillering dynamics and panicle structure were investigated, and the effects of increasing silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer and density treatments on rice growth and yield were analyzed. The results showed that silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer and transplanting density jointly affected rice yield. Under the same nitrogen application rate and silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer, the increase of transplanting density could significantly increase the effective panicle, population dry matter production and tiller number of rice, and increase rice yield. Compared with M1, M3 and M4 treatments, the effective panicle under M2 treatment increased by 5.83%, 13.69% and 12.50% on average in 2 years. At the same density, application of silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer could significantly increase the effective panicle, increase the accumulation of dry matter in rice, and significantly improve the leaf area index of rice in the later stage of growth. The average yield increased by 8.30%~12.56% in 2 years compared with no application of silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer. Combining the interaction effect of silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer and transplanting density, under the conditions of this experiment, when the pure nitrogen application rate was 150 kg·hm^-2, the application of silicon, calcium, potassium and magnesium fertilizer was 300 kg·hm^-2, and the transplanting density was 16.0×10⁴ plants·hm^-2, ‘Jingliangyou 534’ had the largest dry matter production and yield. The results could provide reference for high-yield and high-efficiency rice cultivation in Sichuan.

Key words: fertilizer of silicon， calcium， potassium and magnesium, transplanting density, tiller, yield

摘要：

为研究硅钙钾镁肥及栽培密度对杂交稻分蘖特性、物质积累和产量形成等的影响，以‘晶两优534’为供试品种，试验采用裂区设计，主区设置不施硅钙钾镁肥和增施硅钙钾镁肥（G）2个肥料处理，副区设置19.3万（M1）、16.0万（M2）、13.0万（M3）和10.0⁴万株·hm^-2（M4）共4个移栽密度。通过连续2年田间定位试验，调查水稻产量及其构成因素、干物质积累、分蘖动态及成穗结构，分析增施硅钙钾镁肥和密度处理对水稻生长和产量的影响。结果表明，硅钙钾镁肥和移栽密度共同影响水稻产量。在相同施氮量和硅钙钾镁肥下，移栽密度的增加可显著提高水稻有效穗数、群体干物质生产量和分蘖数，增加水稻产量，M2处理下有效穗数较M1、M3和M4处理2年平均提高5.83%、13.69%和12.50%；相同密度下增施硅钙钾镁肥能显著提高有效穗数，增加水稻干物质积累，提高水稻生育后期叶面积指数，增施硅钙钾镁肥较不施硅钙钾镁肥2年平均增产8.30%~12.56%。综合硅钙钾镁肥和移栽密度的互作效应，本试验条件下，在施纯氮量150 kg·hm^-2时增施硅钙钾镁肥300 kg·hm^-2、移栽密度16.0×10⁴株·hm^-2时，‘晶两优534’干物质生产量最大，产量最高。研究结果可为四川水稻高产高效栽培提供参考。

关键词: 硅钙钾镁肥, 移栽密度, 分蘖, 产量

CLC Number:

S511

Rigui ASHEN, Rongping ZHANG, Ningning ZHOU, Tingyu FENG, Lin ZHOU, Peng MA, Lise AER, Xuehuan LIAO, Keyuan ZHANG. Effects of Silicon， Calcium， Potassium and Magnesium Fertilizer and Density on Rice Yield Formation[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(3): 155-163.

阿什日轨, 张荣萍, 周宁宁, 冯婷煜, 周林, 马鹏, 阿尔力色, 廖雪环, 张坷塬. 硅钙钾镁肥和密度对水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 155-163.

Figures/Tables 6

References 25

1	ZHANG H, YU C, KONG X, et al.. Progressive integrative crop managements increase grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and irrigation water productivity in rice [J]. Field Crops Res., 2018, 215:1-11.
2	LIU Q, CHEN S, ZHOU L, et al.. Characteristics of population quality and rice quality of Semi-Waxy japonica rice varieties with different grain yields [J/OL]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(2): 241[2022-07-16]. .
3	马均,徐富贤,郑家国,等.四川盆地杂交水稻资源利用与高产优质高效关键技术研究与应用[C]//中国作物学会.2018中国作物学会学术年会论文摘要集.北京:中国作物学会, 2018:35.
4	HUANG M, YANG C, JI Q, et al.. Tillering responses of rice to plant density and nitrogen rate in a subtropical environment of southern China [J]. Field Crops Res., 2013, 149: 187-192.
5	田广丽,周毅,孙博,等.氮素及栽培密度影响水稻分蘖动态的机制[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(4):896-904.
	TIAN G L, ZHOU Y, SUN B,et al.. Effects of nitrogen and transplanting density on the mechanisms of tillering dynamic of rice [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sic., 2018, 24(4):896-904.
6	ZHOU C C, HUANG Y C, JIA B Y, et al.. Optimization of nitrogen rate and planting density for improving the grain yield of different rice genotypes in northeast China [J/OL]. Agronomy, 2019, 9(9):555 [2022-07-16]. .
7	冀建华,李絮花,刘秀梅,等.硅钙钾镁肥对南方稻田土壤酸度的改良作用[J].土壤学报,2019,56(4):895-906.
	JI J H, LI X H, LIU X M, et al.. Improvement effect of fertilizer of silicon calcium potassium magnesium on soil acidity in southern paddy fields [J]. Acta pedol. Sin., 2019, 56(4): 895-906.
8	韩科峰,陈余平,胡铁军,等.硅钙钾镁肥对浙江省酸性水稻土壤的改良效果[J].浙江农业学报,2018,30(1):117-122.
	HAN K F, CHEN Y P, HU T J, et al.. Improvement effect of fertilizer of silicon calcium potassium magnesium on acid rice soil in Zhejiang province [J]. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(1): 117-122.
9	解秋,曾详忠,李小燕,等.不同硅钙钾镁肥用量对四川平原地区水稻生长及养分吸收利用的影响[J].广西农学报,2020,35(6):5-10.
	XIE Q, ZENG X Z, LI X Y, et al.. Effects of different amounts of fertilizer of silicon,calcium,potassium and magnesium on rice growth and nutrient utilization in sichuan plain area [J]. J. Guangxi Agric., 2020, 35(6): 5-10.
10	林洪鑫,潘晓华,石庆华,等.施氮量与栽插密度对超级早稻中早22产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(1):22-28.
	LIN H X, PAN X H, SHI Q H, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on yield of super early rice Zhongzao 22 [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sic., 2011,17(1):22-28.
11	柯健,陈婷婷,吴周,等.沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J].作物学报,2022,48(4):1005-1016.
	KE J, CHEN T T, WU Z, et al.. Suitable varieties and high-yielding population characteristics of late season rice in the northern margin area of double-cropping rice along the Yangtze River [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2022,48(4):1005-1016.
12	王海月,殷尧翥,孙永健,等.不同株距和缓释氮肥配施量下机插杂交稻的产量及光合特性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(4):843-855.
	WANG H Y, YIN Y Z, SUN Y J, et al.. Yield and photosynthetic characteristics of machine-transplanted hybrid rice under different plant spacing and application rate of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sic., 2017,23(4):843-855.
13	PENG B, FENG G N, ZHEN Q, et al.. Effects of ozone and density interaction on the growth, development and yield formation of rice [J]. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 2018, 16(4): 4199-4215.
14	梁传斌,李建国,沈枫,等.移栽密度和施用生物炭对水稻产量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021(2):240-247.
	LIANG C B, LI J G, SHEN F, et al.. Effects of transplanting density and application of biochar on rice yield [J]. China Soil Fert., 2021(2):240-247.
15	龙旭,马均,许凤英,等.水稻强化栽培的适宜秧龄和栽植密度研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2005,23(3):368-373.
	LONG X, MA J, XU F Y, et al.. Research on suitable seedling age and planting density for rice intensive cultivation [J]. J. Sichuan Agric. Univ., 2005,23(3):368-373.
16	徐新朋,周卫,梁国庆,等.氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(3):763-772.
	XU X P, ZHOU W, LIANG G Q, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer dosage and density on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-cropping rice [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2015, 21(3):763-772.
17	樊红柱,曾祥忠,吕世华.水稻不同移栽密度的氮肥效应及氮素去向[J].核农学报,2009,23(4):681-685.
	FAN H Z, ZENG X Z, LYU S H. Nitrogen fertilizer effect and nitrogen fate of different transplanting densities of rice [J]. Acta. Agric. Nucl. Sin., 2009,23(4):681-685.
18	秦俭,蒋开锋,张涛,等.施氮量和移栽密度对重穗型杂交稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J].中国稻米,2017,23(4):94-98.
	QIN J, JIANG K F, ZHANG T, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and transplanting density on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of heavy-spike hybrid rice [J].China Rice, 2017,23(4):94-98.
19	陈海飞,冯洋,蔡红梅,等.氮肥与移栽密度互作对低产田水稻群体结构及产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(6):1319-1328.
	CHEN H F, FENG Y, CAI H M, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and transplanting density interaction on rice population structure and yield in low-yield fields [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2014,20(6):1319-1328.
20	刘红江,郭智,张岳芳,等.移栽密度及氮肥投入量对水稻氮素利用效率的协同效应[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(12):3952-3960.
	LIU H J, GUO Z, ZHANG Y F, et al.. Synergistic effect of transplanting density and nitrogen fertilizer input on nitrogen use efficiency of rice [J]. J. Ecol., 2021, 40(12): 3952-3960.
21	MASSCHENLEYN P H, DCLAUNE R D, PATRICK W H J R. Effect of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol.,1991, 25(8):1414-1419.
22	宁东峰,刘战东,肖俊夫,等.水稻土施用钢渣硅钙肥对土壤硅素形态和水稻生长的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2016,35(8):42-46.
	NING D F, LIU Z D, XIAO J F, et al.. Effects of application of steel slag silicon and calcium fertilizer on paddy soil on soil silicon form and rice growth [J]. J. Irrig. Drain., 2016,35(8):42-46.
23	LIU X, ZHANG A, JI C, et al.. Biochar's effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions—a meta-analysis of literature data [J]. Plant Soil, 2013, 373(1): 583-594.
24	叶建海,陈余平,孙文岳,等. 硅钙镁磷钾肥3年定位试验对早稻产量及性状的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2017,58(5):752-753, 757.
	YE J H, CHEN Y P, SUN W Y, et al.. Effects of 3-year positioning experiment of silicon calcium magnesium phosphorus potassium fertilizer on yield and characters of early rice [J]. J. Zhejiang Agric. Sci., 2017, 58(5): 752-753, 757.
25	凌启鸿,张洪程,蔡建中,等.水稻高产群体质量及其优化控制探讨[J].中国农业科学, 1993, 26(6): 1-11.
	LING Q H, ZHANG H C, CAI J Z, et al.. Inrestigation on the population quality high yield and its optimizing control programme in rice [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 1993, 26(6): 1-11.

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective spikes/（10⁴·hm^-²）	每穗总粒数 Total grains per panicle	结实率 Grain filling/%	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	产量 Yield /（t·hm^-²）
2020	M1	220.47 d	186.14 ab	87.28 ab	24.13 d	8.69 cd
	M2	228.93 c	187.66 a	85.79 bc	24.19 d	8.88 c
	M3	211.07 e	180.74 bcd	83.54 cd	24.72 ab	7.81 e
	M4	200.20 f	183.44 abc	85.15 bcd	24.35 cd	7.61 e
	GM1	266.09 a	175.15 de	82.07 d	24.92 a	9.53 b
	GM2	263.91 a	177.82 cde	89.52 a	24.64 abc	10.35 a
	GM3	247.10 b	171.36 e	87.50 ab	24.58 bc	9.11 bc
	GM4	222.22 d	178.93 cd	86.53 abc	24.43 bcd	8.40 d
	G	**	**	ns	**	**
	M	**	**	**	ns	**
	G×M	**	ns	**	**	ns
2021	M1	228.08 d	216.66 a	93.57 a	22.14 b	10.35 c
	M2	245.89 b	212.29 a	94.23 a	22.35 ab	11.00 b
	M3	206.78 f	212.55 a	94.92 a	22.54 ab	9.40 d
	M4	222.22 de	209.23 a	93.13 a	22.57 ab	9.78 d
	GM1	243.28 bc	215.46 a	93.29 a	22.63 a	11.07 b
	GM2	256.49 a	218.56 a	94.98 a	22.40 ab	11.93 a
	GM3	216.22 e	217.33 a	94.72 a	22.63 a	10.12 c
	GM4	236.24 c	215.23 a	93.84 a	22.48 ab	10.73 bc
	G	**	ns	ns	*	**
	M	**	ns	*	ns	**
	Y	*	**	**	**	**
	G×M	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Y×M	*	**	**	*	**

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective spikes/（10⁴·hm^-²）	每穗总粒数 Total grains per panicle	结实率 Grain filling/%	千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g	产量 Yield /（t·hm^-²）
2020	M1	220.47 d	186.14 ab	87.28 ab	24.13 d	8.69 cd
	M2	228.93 c	187.66 a	85.79 bc	24.19 d	8.88 c
	M3	211.07 e	180.74 bcd	83.54 cd	24.72 ab	7.81 e
	M4	200.20 f	183.44 abc	85.15 bcd	24.35 cd	7.61 e
	GM1	266.09 a	175.15 de	82.07 d	24.92 a	9.53 b
	GM2	263.91 a	177.82 cde	89.52 a	24.64 abc	10.35 a
	GM3	247.10 b	171.36 e	87.50 ab	24.58 bc	9.11 bc
	GM4	222.22 d	178.93 cd	86.53 abc	24.43 bcd	8.40 d
	G	**	**	ns	**	**
	M	**	**	**	ns	**
	G×M	**	ns	**	**	ns
2021	M1	228.08 d	216.66 a	93.57 a	22.14 b	10.35 c
	M2	245.89 b	212.29 a	94.23 a	22.35 ab	11.00 b
	M3	206.78 f	212.55 a	94.92 a	22.54 ab	9.40 d
	M4	222.22 de	209.23 a	93.13 a	22.57 ab	9.78 d
	GM1	243.28 bc	215.46 a	93.29 a	22.63 a	11.07 b
	GM2	256.49 a	218.56 a	94.98 a	22.40 ab	11.93 a
	GM3	216.22 e	217.33 a	94.72 a	22.63 a	10.12 c
	GM4	236.24 c	215.23 a	93.84 a	22.48 ab	10.73 bc
	G	**	ns	ns	*	**
	M	**	ns	*	ns	**
	Y	*	**	**	**	**
	G×M	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
	Y×M	*	**	**	*	**

年份Year	处理 Treatment	拔节期 Jointing period		齐穗期 Full head stage			成熟期 Mature stage
年份Year	处理 Treatment	茎鞘Stem	叶Leaf	茎鞘Stem	叶Leaf	穗Panicle	茎鞘Stem	叶Leaf	穗Panicle
2020	M1	3 103.74 e	2 170.52 c	7 648.15 b	2 797.10 de	1 825.24 b	4 840.92 e	2 174.54 cd	8 848.93 ab
	M2	3 601.05 c	2 412.25 bc	7 330.62 cd	2 929.05 cd	1 638.39 c	4 998.37 d	2 156.97 d	8 930.79 ab
	M3	4 489.33 a	2 280.63 c	7 214.58 d	2 829.67 de	1 544.40 d	4 387.65 g	1 887.89 f	7 368.41 e
	M4	2 875.68 f	2 057.44 d	7 423.85 bcd	2 748.36 e	1 877.46 b	5 488.95 a	1 978.23 e	8 494.18 c
	GM1	3 753.12 c	2 553.19 ab	8 761.93 a	3 471.83 a	2 019.10 a	5 074.91 c	2 296.81 b	9 011.33 a
	GM2	3 974.37 b	2 787.18 a	7 556.22 bc	3 193.05 b	1 860.79 b	5 195.35 b	2 544.16 a	8 657.36 bc
	GM3	3 377.40 d	2 662.40 ab	7 310.34 d	3 045.47 bc	2 055.30 a	4 652.99 f	2 171.15 cd	7 983.60 d
	GM4	3 009.00 ef	2 180.76 c	6 429.96 e	2 542.39 f	1 718.14 c	4 157.32 h	2 190.32 c	8 641.38 bc
	G	ns	*	**	**	**	**	**	**
	M	**	*	**	**	**	**	**	**
	G×M	**	ns	**	**	**	**	**	**
2021	M1	4 365.56 c	2 304.27 c	7 044.16 d	2 415.30 e	1 872.23 d	3 687.35 e	1 614.64 d	9 685.32 c
	M2	4 898.98 b	2 394.05 bc	8 552.69 a	3 005.49 b	2 202.68 b	5 416.07 b	1 698.38 c	10 619.97 bc
	M3	4 075.71 d	2 276.08 cd	6 263.43 e	2 210.24 d	1 647.17 e	4 951.06 c	1 432.78 e	7 752.08 d
	M4	4 405.40 c	2 044.04 e	7 524.19 c	2 675.67 d	2 061.40 c	5 546.21 b	1 661.63 c	10 161.50 bc
	GM1	4 012.18 d	2 173.58 d	8 054.18 b	3 132.85 b	1 982.62 c	5 197.94 c	2 304.28 a	11 105.82 b
	GM2	5 649.02 a	2 909.00 a	8 103.31 b	3 795.51 a	2 688.84 a	6 404.39 a	2 284.24 a	13 260.30 a
	GM3	5 055.44 b	2 499.13 b	6 875.44 d	2 486.57 e	1 623.79 e	4 587.23 d	1 774.52 c	8 120.24 d
	GM4	4 047.71 d	2 324.32 c	6 874.21 d	2 837.84 c	1 591.92 e	4 914.92 c	1 960.96 b	10 572.91 bc
	G	ns	*	*	**	ns	**	**	**
	M	**	*	**	**	**	**	*	**
	G×M	*	ns	**	ns	**	**	ns	**

年份Year	处理 Treatment	拔节期 Jointing period		齐穗期 Full head stage			成熟期 Mature stage
年份Year	处理 Treatment	茎鞘Stem	叶Leaf	茎鞘Stem	叶Leaf	穗Panicle	茎鞘Stem	叶Leaf	穗Panicle
2020	M1	3 103.74 e	2 170.52 c	7 648.15 b	2 797.10 de	1 825.24 b	4 840.92 e	2 174.54 cd	8 848.93 ab
	M2	3 601.05 c	2 412.25 bc	7 330.62 cd	2 929.05 cd	1 638.39 c	4 998.37 d	2 156.97 d	8 930.79 ab
	M3	4 489.33 a	2 280.63 c	7 214.58 d	2 829.67 de	1 544.40 d	4 387.65 g	1 887.89 f	7 368.41 e
	M4	2 875.68 f	2 057.44 d	7 423.85 bcd	2 748.36 e	1 877.46 b	5 488.95 a	1 978.23 e	8 494.18 c
	GM1	3 753.12 c	2 553.19 ab	8 761.93 a	3 471.83 a	2 019.10 a	5 074.91 c	2 296.81 b	9 011.33 a
	GM2	3 974.37 b	2 787.18 a	7 556.22 bc	3 193.05 b	1 860.79 b	5 195.35 b	2 544.16 a	8 657.36 bc
	GM3	3 377.40 d	2 662.40 ab	7 310.34 d	3 045.47 bc	2 055.30 a	4 652.99 f	2 171.15 cd	7 983.60 d
	GM4	3 009.00 ef	2 180.76 c	6 429.96 e	2 542.39 f	1 718.14 c	4 157.32 h	2 190.32 c	8 641.38 bc
	G	ns	*	**	**	**	**	**	**
	M	**	*	**	**	**	**	**	**
	G×M	**	ns	**	**	**	**	**	**
2021	M1	4 365.56 c	2 304.27 c	7 044.16 d	2 415.30 e	1 872.23 d	3 687.35 e	1 614.64 d	9 685.32 c
	M2	4 898.98 b	2 394.05 bc	8 552.69 a	3 005.49 b	2 202.68 b	5 416.07 b	1 698.38 c	10 619.97 bc
	M3	4 075.71 d	2 276.08 cd	6 263.43 e	2 210.24 d	1 647.17 e	4 951.06 c	1 432.78 e	7 752.08 d
	M4	4 405.40 c	2 044.04 e	7 524.19 c	2 675.67 d	2 061.40 c	5 546.21 b	1 661.63 c	10 161.50 bc
	GM1	4 012.18 d	2 173.58 d	8 054.18 b	3 132.85 b	1 982.62 c	5 197.94 c	2 304.28 a	11 105.82 b
	GM2	5 649.02 a	2 909.00 a	8 103.31 b	3 795.51 a	2 688.84 a	6 404.39 a	2 284.24 a	13 260.30 a
	GM3	5 055.44 b	2 499.13 b	6 875.44 d	2 486.57 e	1 623.79 e	4 587.23 d	1 774.52 c	8 120.24 d
	GM4	4 047.71 d	2 324.32 c	6 874.21 d	2 837.84 c	1 591.92 e	4 914.92 c	1 960.96 b	10 572.91 bc
	G	ns	*	*	**	ns	**	**	**
	M	**	*	**	**	**	**	*	**
	G×M	*	ns	**	ns	**	**	ns	**

[1]	Zhongyi LI, Hongqin TANG, Wenbin DONG, Caihui WEI, Tieguang HE. Effects of Co-incorporation of Rice Straw and Chinese Milk Vetch on Photosynthetic Characteristics， Yield and Quality of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 171-180.
[2]	Hui WANG, Hongyu FU, Yunkai YUE, Guoxian CUI, Wei SHE. Ramie Yield SSA-BP Prediction Model Based on Climate Variables [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 110-118.
[3]	Yanfei FANG, Xiaoying LUO, Jianghua TANG, Tingting SUN, Luzhen WANG, Tian TANG, Wenxiu XU. Effects of Sowing Methods on Yield， Dry Matter and Water Use Efficiency of Spring Wheat in Dryland [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 173-181.
[4]	Yuanyuan DUAN, Xiaohong LIU, Tao TANG, Fanfan WANG, Jingmao YOU, Xiaoliang GUO, Jie GUO. Effects of Planting Density on Growth and Quality of Fritillaria hupehensis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 197-206.
[5]	Ying ZHOU, Jingyong LI, Linxiu DAI, Dicai AO, Ziyi LI, Fan YANG, Junwei GU, Qiang XU, Zhi DOU, Hui GAO. Effect of Melatonin Spraying on Rice Yield Formation and Lodging Resistance Under Rice-Crayfish Coculture Mode [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 34-42.
[6]	Wei WANG, Qiang ZHAO, Abuduaini Munire·, Alimu·Amuli, Xinxin LI, Yangqing TIAN. Effects of Different Exogenous Substances on Chemical Capping and Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 57-68.
[7]	Chenyang ZHANG, Minggang XU, Fei WANG, Ran LI, Nan SUN. Effects of Manure Application on Soybean Yield and Soil Nutrients in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 148-156.
[8]	Zhigang ZHENG, Li XIANG, Gongyi LIU, Cai XU, Bin QIN, Weiqin WANG, Huabin ZHENG, Qiyuan TANG. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Density on Growth and Yield of Orderly Machine-thrown Early Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 132-143.
[9]	Yaxuan MENG, Wei MA, Xuhang YAO, Yingqi SUN, Xin ZHONG, Shan HUANG, Qiaoyun WENG, Yinghui LIU, Jincheng YUAN. Study on the Response Factors of Maize Yield to Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 153-160.
[10]	Wen ZHOU, Xiaoheng GUO, Rui XU, Xiaoli WANG, Huiwei NIU, Dan HAN, Huifang SHAO. Effects of Intercropping Pinellia ternata on Growth， Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 161-169.
[11]	PANG Zhe, WANG Qilong, LI Juan. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties， Rice Yield and Economic Benefits in Low-lying Saline Alkali Land in Northern Shaanxi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 174-180.
[12]	Panpan ZHANG, Chuan LI, Meiwei ZHANG, Xia ZHAO, Jun NIU, Jiangfang QIAO. Effect of Nitrification Inhibitor Application on Nitrogen Accumulation and Transportation and Grain Yield of Summer Maize Under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 181-189.
[13]	Lu TIAN, Xiaoxia GUO, Wenbin SU, Chunyan HUANG, Zhi LI, Peng ZHANG, Caiyuan JIAN, Jia LIU, Dejuan KONG, Kang HAN. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on Growth， Yield and Quality of Continuous Cropping Sugar Beet [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 192-203.
[14]	Chen CHEN, Ke SHI, Changwei ZHU, Guiying JIANG, Lan LUO, Weiwei MENG, Fang LIU, Fengmin SHEN, Shiliang LIU. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Wheat Photosynthetic Characteristics， Yield， and Soil Nitrogen Content in Fluvo-aquic Soil in Northern Henan Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 24-33.
[15]	Yanjun KE, Yumeng ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Zitao ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Combined with Subsoiling on Farmland Soil Fertility and Crop Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 157-166.