Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (7): 161-169.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0009
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Wen ZHOU1(), Xiaoheng GUO1(
), Rui XU2, Xiaoli WANG2, Huiwei NIU3, Dan HAN1(
), Huifang SHAO1(
)
Received:
2022-01-05
Accepted:
2022-04-12
Online:
2023-07-15
Published:
2023-08-25
Contact:
Dan HAN,Huifang SHAO
周文1(), 郭笑恒1(
), 徐锐2, 王晓丽2, 牛慧伟3, 韩丹1(
), 邵惠芳1(
)
通讯作者:
韩丹,邵惠芳
作者简介:
周文 E-mail:2207568640@qq.com基金资助:
CLC Number:
Wen ZHOU, Xiaoheng GUO, Rui XU, Xiaoli WANG, Huiwei NIU, Dan HAN, Huifang SHAO. Effects of Intercropping Pinellia ternata on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 161-169.
周文, 郭笑恒, 徐锐, 王晓丽, 牛慧伟, 韩丹, 邵惠芳. 烤烟间作半夏对烤烟生长及产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(7): 161-169.
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎围 Stem girth/cm | 节间距 Pitch step/cm | 最大叶面积 Maximum leaf area/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 91.60±5.77 b | 9.70±0.51 a | 4.88±0.29 a | 1 304.45±72.79 b |
C1 | 101.90±3.77 a | 9.71±0.44 a | 4.79±0.17 a | 1 454.27±82.46 a |
C2 | 105.90±6.42 a | 9.66±0.82 a | 4.67±0.38 a | 1 486.49±79.63 a |
C3 | 98.70±4.58 ab | 9.55±0.65 a | 4.84±0.26 a | 1 352.37±86.38 ab |
Table 1 Field agronomic traits of flue?cured tobacco at maturity stage under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 茎围 Stem girth/cm | 节间距 Pitch step/cm | 最大叶面积 Maximum leaf area/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 91.60±5.77 b | 9.70±0.51 a | 4.88±0.29 a | 1 304.45±72.79 b |
C1 | 101.90±3.77 a | 9.71±0.44 a | 4.79±0.17 a | 1 454.27±82.46 a |
C2 | 105.90±6.42 a | 9.66±0.82 a | 4.67±0.38 a | 1 486.49±79.63 a |
C3 | 98.70±4.58 ab | 9.55±0.65 a | 4.84±0.26 a | 1 352.37±86.38 ab |
处理 Treatment | 茎叶夹角 Cauline leaf angle/(°) | 叶向值 Leaf orientation value | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 63.50±3.53 c | 82.36±4.74 c | 4.58±0.36 a | 8.30±0.30 c |
C1 | 67.00±4.37 bc | 86.54±6.53 bc | 2.48±0.19 c | 8.93±0.36 bc |
C2 | 77.00±6.04 a | 95.13±5.49 a | 3.60±0.22 b | 10.31±0.41 a |
C3 | 72.00±4.35 b | 90.75±6.94 b | 4.26±0.25 a | 9.17±0.41 b |
Table 2 Coronal morphology indexes of flue?cured tobacco at maturity under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 茎叶夹角 Cauline leaf angle/(°) | 叶向值 Leaf orientation value | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2·s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 63.50±3.53 c | 82.36±4.74 c | 4.58±0.36 a | 8.30±0.30 c |
C1 | 67.00±4.37 bc | 86.54±6.53 bc | 2.48±0.19 c | 8.93±0.36 bc |
C2 | 77.00±6.04 a | 95.13±5.49 a | 3.60±0.22 b | 10.31±0.41 a |
C3 | 72.00±4.35 b | 90.75±6.94 b | 4.26±0.25 a | 9.17±0.41 b |
指标Index | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
发病率 Incidence rate/% | 43.02±0.51 a | 21.55±0.12 d | 27.27±0.21 b | 26.56±0.18 c |
病情指数 Disease index/% | 20.70±0.31 a | 11.38±0.08 d | 14.34±0.11 b | 12.81±0.10 c |
相对防治效果 Relative control effect/% | — | 45.02±0.33 a | 30.72±0.25 c | 38.12±0.34 b |
Table 3 Situation of red star disease in flue?cured tobacco at mature stage under different treatments
指标Index | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
发病率 Incidence rate/% | 43.02±0.51 a | 21.55±0.12 d | 27.27±0.21 b | 26.56±0.18 c |
病情指数 Disease index/% | 20.70±0.31 a | 11.38±0.08 d | 14.34±0.11 b | 12.81±0.10 c |
相对防治效果 Relative control effect/% | — | 45.02±0.33 a | 30.72±0.25 c | 38.12±0.34 b |
叶位 Leaf position | 处理Treatment | 总糖含量 Total sugar content/% | 烟碱含量 Nicotine content/% | 氯含量Chlorine content/% | 还原糖含量 Reducing sugar content/% | 钾含量Kalium content/% | 两糖比 Ratio sugar/total sugar | 糖碱比 Ratio sugar/nicotine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶Upper leaves | CK | 19.72±0.44 c | 3.06±0.14 a | 0.83±0.05 a | 16.49±0.97 c | 1.94±0.26 a | 0.84±0.04 b | 5.39±0.12 c |
C1 | 23.27±1.00 a | 3.19±0.18 a | 0.38±0.03 c | 17.21±0.54 bc | 2.24±0.12 a | 0.74±0.02 c | 5.39±0.19 c | |
C2 | 21.37±0.49 b | 3.01±0.25 a | 0.47±0.03 b | 19.72±0.33 a | 2.10±0.18 a | 0.92±0.07 a | 6.55±0.13 a | |
C3 | 20.67±1.45 bc | 3.01±0.17 a | 0.72±0.06 a | 18.03±0.43 b | 1.98±0.23 a | 0.88±0.09 ab | 5.99±0.21 b | |
中部叶Middle leaves | CK | 18.72±0.90 c | 3.12±0.11 a | 0.62±0.05 a | 14.72±1.09 b | 1.65±0.11 b | 0.79±0.03 a | 4.72±0.11 c |
C1 | 28.66±1.37 a | 2.34±0.13 c | 0.32±0.02 c | 22.07±0.94 a | 2.22±0.28 a | 0.76±0.06 a | 9.43±0.21 a | |
C2 | 22.10±1.87 b | 2.63±0.13 b | 0.45±0.05 b | 16.62±0.98 b | 2.16±0.27 a | 0.75±0.05 a | 6.32±0.12 b | |
C3 | 19.95±1.24 bc | 3.08±0.19 a | 0.57±0.07 ab | 15.43±0.96 b | 2.00±0.20 a | 0.77±0.06 a | 5.06±0.10 c | |
下部叶Lower leaves | CK | 21.02±1.16 a | 1.67±0.06 b | 1.10±0.06 a | 16.18±0.86 a | 2.79±0.25 b | 0.77±0.04 a | 9.69±0.36 a |
C1 | 16.52±1.40 b | 1.47±0.12 c | 0.68±0.05 c | 11.90±0.50 b | 3.47±0.54 b | 0.72±0.03 b | 8.10±0.23 b | |
C2 | 20.39±1.27 a | 1.69±0.09 b | 0.92±0.07 b | 15.36±0.90 a | 4.12±0.24 a | 0.75±0.03 a | 9.09±0.31 ab | |
C3 | 21.81±1.05 a | 2.65±0.18 a | 1.06±0.07 ab | 17.02±0.54 a | 3.10±0.12 b | 0.73±0.04 ab | 6.05±0.14 c |
Table 4 Chemical composition indexes of flue-cured tobacco leaves under different treatments
叶位 Leaf position | 处理Treatment | 总糖含量 Total sugar content/% | 烟碱含量 Nicotine content/% | 氯含量Chlorine content/% | 还原糖含量 Reducing sugar content/% | 钾含量Kalium content/% | 两糖比 Ratio sugar/total sugar | 糖碱比 Ratio sugar/nicotine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶Upper leaves | CK | 19.72±0.44 c | 3.06±0.14 a | 0.83±0.05 a | 16.49±0.97 c | 1.94±0.26 a | 0.84±0.04 b | 5.39±0.12 c |
C1 | 23.27±1.00 a | 3.19±0.18 a | 0.38±0.03 c | 17.21±0.54 bc | 2.24±0.12 a | 0.74±0.02 c | 5.39±0.19 c | |
C2 | 21.37±0.49 b | 3.01±0.25 a | 0.47±0.03 b | 19.72±0.33 a | 2.10±0.18 a | 0.92±0.07 a | 6.55±0.13 a | |
C3 | 20.67±1.45 bc | 3.01±0.17 a | 0.72±0.06 a | 18.03±0.43 b | 1.98±0.23 a | 0.88±0.09 ab | 5.99±0.21 b | |
中部叶Middle leaves | CK | 18.72±0.90 c | 3.12±0.11 a | 0.62±0.05 a | 14.72±1.09 b | 1.65±0.11 b | 0.79±0.03 a | 4.72±0.11 c |
C1 | 28.66±1.37 a | 2.34±0.13 c | 0.32±0.02 c | 22.07±0.94 a | 2.22±0.28 a | 0.76±0.06 a | 9.43±0.21 a | |
C2 | 22.10±1.87 b | 2.63±0.13 b | 0.45±0.05 b | 16.62±0.98 b | 2.16±0.27 a | 0.75±0.05 a | 6.32±0.12 b | |
C3 | 19.95±1.24 bc | 3.08±0.19 a | 0.57±0.07 ab | 15.43±0.96 b | 2.00±0.20 a | 0.77±0.06 a | 5.06±0.10 c | |
下部叶Lower leaves | CK | 21.02±1.16 a | 1.67±0.06 b | 1.10±0.06 a | 16.18±0.86 a | 2.79±0.25 b | 0.77±0.04 a | 9.69±0.36 a |
C1 | 16.52±1.40 b | 1.47±0.12 c | 0.68±0.05 c | 11.90±0.50 b | 3.47±0.54 b | 0.72±0.03 b | 8.10±0.23 b | |
C2 | 20.39±1.27 a | 1.69±0.09 b | 0.92±0.07 b | 15.36±0.90 a | 4.12±0.24 a | 0.75±0.03 a | 9.09±0.31 ab | |
C3 | 21.81±1.05 a | 2.65±0.18 a | 1.06±0.07 ab | 17.02±0.54 a | 3.10±0.12 b | 0.73±0.04 ab | 6.05±0.14 c |
叶位 Leaf position | 类别 Category | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶Upper leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 48.09±2.40 b | 63.29±2.53 ab | 72.92±3.65 a | 50.24±3.01 b |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 15.87±0.79 a | 13.58±0.81 b | 15.18±0.76 a | 11.57±0.46 c | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 15.04±0.60 c | 21.12±1.27 a | 18.04±0.81 b | 18.51±0.87 ab | |
类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 22.12±1.15 b | 9.87±0.23 d | 38.57±2.12 a | 16.04±0.58 c | |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 566.41±20.23 d | 742.10±25.32 b | 786.81±26.41 a | 728.04±23.15 c | |
总量Total | 667.53±31.37 c | 849.96±38.25 ab | 931.52±45.64 a | 824.40±38.76 b | |
中部叶Middle leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 49.95±2.55 c | 53.28±3.12 b | 43.96±2.67 d | 58.19±2.56 a |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 11.91±0.75 a | 12.73±1.27 a | 7.42±0.65 b | 7.95±0.26 b | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 20.22±0.89 a | 21.04±0.44 a | 13.36±0.27 d | 15.21±0.56 c |
Table 5 Content of neutral aromatic substances in leaves of different positions under different treatments
叶位 Leaf position | 类别 Category | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
上部叶Upper leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 48.09±2.40 b | 63.29±2.53 ab | 72.92±3.65 a | 50.24±3.01 b |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 15.87±0.79 a | 13.58±0.81 b | 15.18±0.76 a | 11.57±0.46 c | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 15.04±0.60 c | 21.12±1.27 a | 18.04±0.81 b | 18.51±0.87 ab | |
类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 22.12±1.15 b | 9.87±0.23 d | 38.57±2.12 a | 16.04±0.58 c | |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 566.41±20.23 d | 742.10±25.32 b | 786.81±26.41 a | 728.04±23.15 c | |
总量Total | 667.53±31.37 c | 849.96±38.25 ab | 931.52±45.64 a | 824.40±38.76 b | |
中部叶Middle leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 49.95±2.55 c | 53.28±3.12 b | 43.96±2.67 d | 58.19±2.56 a |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 11.91±0.75 a | 12.73±1.27 a | 7.42±0.65 b | 7.95±0.26 b | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 20.22±0.89 a | 21.04±0.44 a | 13.36±0.27 d | 15.21±0.56 c |
叶位 Leaf position | 类别 Category | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
中部叶Middle leaves | 类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 23.85±1.95 a | 20.83±1.56b | 7.58±0.25 c | 5.23±0.18 c |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 559.74±22.36 d | 593.78±24.61 c | 784.65±28.37 b | 823.42±30.22 a | |
总量Total | 665.67±26.43 d | 701.66±29.32 c | 856.97±32.76 b | 910.00±37.64 a | |
下部叶Lower leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 42.14±2.57 b | 32.43±2.31 c | 63.23±3.45 a | 32.20±2.51 c |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 15.36±1.07 b | 7.71±0.85 c | 19.02±1.32 a | 6.79±0.26 c | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 20.90±1.99 b | 16.67±1.31 c | 25.56±1.04 a | 10.88±0.61 d | |
类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 31.45±2.64 b | 11.15±1.87 c | 43.00±3.12 a | 30.21±2.45 b | |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 435.62±17.34 c | 653.08±28.64 a | 644.40±24.38 a | 512.94±20.43 b | |
总量Total | 545.47±21.54 b | 721.04±33.31 a | 795.21±33.56 a | 593.02±24.87 b |
Table 5 Content of neutral aromatic substances in leaves of different positions under different treatments
叶位 Leaf position | 类别 Category | CK | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
中部叶Middle leaves | 类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 23.85±1.95 a | 20.83±1.56b | 7.58±0.25 c | 5.23±0.18 c |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 559.74±22.36 d | 593.78±24.61 c | 784.65±28.37 b | 823.42±30.22 a | |
总量Total | 665.67±26.43 d | 701.66±29.32 c | 856.97±32.76 b | 910.00±37.64 a | |
下部叶Lower leaves | 类胡萝卜素降解产物 Carotenoid degradation products | 42.14±2.57 b | 32.43±2.31 c | 63.23±3.45 a | 32.20±2.51 c |
苯丙氨酸类降解产物 Phenylalanine degradation products | 15.36±1.07 b | 7.71±0.85 c | 19.02±1.32 a | 6.79±0.26 c | |
美拉德反应产物 Maillard reaction product | 20.90±1.99 b | 16.67±1.31 c | 25.56±1.04 a | 10.88±0.61 d | |
类西柏烷类降解产物(茄酮) Ceberane-like degradation products(Solanone) | 31.45±2.64 b | 11.15±1.87 c | 43.00±3.12 a | 30.21±2.45 b | |
叶绿素降解产物(新植二烯) Chlorophyll degradation products(Neophytadiene) | 435.62±17.34 c | 653.08±28.64 a | 644.40±24.38 a | 512.94±20.43 b | |
总量Total | 545.47±21.54 b | 721.04±33.31 a | 795.21±33.56 a | 593.02±24.87 b |
处理 Treatment | 上等烟比例 Fine tobacco ratio/% | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 均价 Average price/(yuan·kg-1) | 产值 Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 成本 Cost/ (yuan·hm-2) | 综合效益 Comprehensive benefit/(yuan·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 55.85±2.12 b | 1 744.05±174.75 a | 25.81±1.02 d | 45 013.95±1 798.05 a | 45 013.95±2 376.45 b | |
C1 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 56.62±2.61 b | 1 289.10±81.30 d | 25.98±1.35 c | 33 490.80±1 985.40 d | 47 740.80±2 974.80 a | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 675.00±49.80 a | 70.00 | 47 250.00±3 449.40 a | 33 000 | |||
C2 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 61.11±3.26 a | 1 392.30±68.85 c | 27.34±2.01 a | 38 065.50±1 654.05 c | 47 365.50±2 436.45 a | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 465.00±34.05 b | 70.00 | 32 550.00±2 135.70 b | 23 250 | |||
C3 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 60.33±2.65 a | 1512.45±95.55 b | 26.21±1.67 b | 39 641.25±2 504.40 b | 43 091.25±2 303.40 c | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 225.00±24.45 c | 70.00 | 15 750.00±1 712.25 c | 12 300 |
Table 6 Economic characters of intercropping pinellia in flue?cured tobacco
处理 Treatment | 上等烟比例 Fine tobacco ratio/% | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 均价 Average price/(yuan·kg-1) | 产值 Output value/(yuan·hm-2) | 成本 Cost/ (yuan·hm-2) | 综合效益 Comprehensive benefit/(yuan·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 55.85±2.12 b | 1 744.05±174.75 a | 25.81±1.02 d | 45 013.95±1 798.05 a | 45 013.95±2 376.45 b | |
C1 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 56.62±2.61 b | 1 289.10±81.30 d | 25.98±1.35 c | 33 490.80±1 985.40 d | 47 740.80±2 974.80 a | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 675.00±49.80 a | 70.00 | 47 250.00±3 449.40 a | 33 000 | |||
C2 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 61.11±3.26 a | 1 392.30±68.85 c | 27.34±2.01 a | 38 065.50±1 654.05 c | 47 365.50±2 436.45 a | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 465.00±34.05 b | 70.00 | 32 550.00±2 135.70 b | 23 250 | |||
C3 | 烤烟 Flue-cured tobacco | 60.33±2.65 a | 1512.45±95.55 b | 26.21±1.67 b | 39 641.25±2 504.40 b | 43 091.25±2 303.40 c | |
半夏 Pinellia ternata | 225.00±24.45 c | 70.00 | 15 750.00±1 712.25 c | 12 300 |
1 | 李远远.连作烟田土壤微生物多样性及微生物制剂应用研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2017. |
LI Y Y. Microbal diversity in continuous cropped tobacco field and application of microbial agents [D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2017 | |
2 | LIU J J, YAO Q, LI Y S, et al.. Continuous cropping of soybean alters the bulk and rhizospheric soil fungal communities in a mollisol of Northeast PR China [J]. Land Degrad. Dev., 2019, 30(14):1725-1738. |
3 | 白羽祥,蔺忠龙,邓小鹏,等.基于逐步回归模型的连作植烟土壤化学性状和酶活性关系分析[J].南方农业学报,2018,49(12):2387-2393. |
BAI Y X, LIN Z L, DENG X P, et al.. Analysis of relationships between chemical properties and enzyme activity in continuous cropping tobacco-planted soil based on stepwise regression model [J]. J. South Agric., 2018, 49(12):2387-2393. | |
4 | 阮维斌,王敬国,张福锁,等.根际微生态系统理论在连作障碍中的应用[J].中国农业科技导报,1999(4):53-58. |
RUAN W B, WANG J G, ZHANG F S, et al.. The application of rhizosphere micro-ecosystem theory to continuous cropping problem [J]. China Agric. Sci. Technol., 1999(4):53-58. | |
5 | 孙会.连作烟田土壤肥力变化及微生物制剂应用研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2016. |
SUN H. The changes of soil fertility in continuous cropped tobacco field and application of microbial agents [D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2016. | |
6 | 白艳茹,马建华,樊明寿.马铃薯连作对土壤酶活性的影响[J].作物杂志,2010(3):34-36. |
BAI Y R, MA J H, FAN M S. Effect of potato continuous cropping on activities of soil enzymes [J]. Crops, 2010(3):34-36. | |
7 | 周广苗. 烤烟和丹参轮间作对土壤生物学性状及烟叶品质的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2020. |
ZHOU G M. Effects of rotation (intercropping) between flue-cured tobacco and salvia miltiorrhiza on soil biological properties and tobacco leaf quality [D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2020. | |
8 | 高林,王新伟,申国明,等.不同连作年限植烟土壤细菌和真菌群落结构差异[J].中国农业科技导报,2019,21(8):147-152. |
GAO L, WANG X W, SHEN G M, et al.. Differences of bacteria and fungi community structure in tobacco-planting soilof different continuous cropping years [J]. China Agric. Sci. Technol., 2019, 21(8):147-152. | |
9 | 张开虹,桑维钧,何世芳,等.不同作物间作对烤烟根际土壤细菌群落组成及功能的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2020,48(4):80-86. |
ZHANG K H, SANG W J, HE S F, et al.. Effects of inter cropping with different crops on bacterial community composition and function in rhizosphere soil of tobacco [J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2020, 48(4):80-86. | |
10 | 郝艳茹,劳秀荣,孙伟红,等.小麦/玉米间作作物根系与根际微环境的交互作用[J].生态与农村环境学报,2003,19(4): 18-22. |
HAO Y R, LAO X R, SUN W H, et al.. Interaction of roots and rhizosphere in the wheat-maize intercropping system [J]. J. Ecol. Rural Environ., 2003,19(4):18-22. | |
11 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查方法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010. |
12 | 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草病虫害分级及调查方法: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,2008. |
13 | 韦凤杰,宋六明,苏新宏,等.不同地表覆盖对烤烟香气成分和含量的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2017,51(5):609-614. |
WEI F J, SONG L M, SU X H, et al.. Effects of different mulching method on content of aroma components and flavor quality in flue-cured tobacco leaves [J]. J. Henan Agric.Univ., 2017, 51(5):609-614. | |
14 | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].第二版.北京:农业出版社,1991:19-107. |
15 | 张宗锦,闫芳芳,孔垂旭,等.烤烟菽麻间作对烟草根结线虫防效及烟叶产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2019,40(2):52-56. |
ZHANG Z J, YAN F F, KONG C X, et al.. Effects of intercropping flue-cured tobacco with Crotalaria junce L. on the control of root-knot nematodes, yield and output of tobacco [J]. Tob. Sci. China, 2019, 40(2):52-56. | |
16 | 赵紫华,时培建,门兴元,等. 基于微景观试验模型系统下作物丰富度对害虫-天敌关系的影响[J].中国科学:生命科学,2013,43(7): 548-556. |
ZHAO Z H, SHI P J, MEN X Y, et al.. Effect of crop richness on pest natural enemy relationship based on micro landscape experimental model system [J]. Sci. Sin. (Vitae), 2013, 43(7):548-556. | |
17 | 薛超群,牟文君,奚家勤,等.烤烟不同间作对烟草黑胫病防控效果的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2015,36(3):77-79. |
XUE C Q, MU W J, XI J Q, et al.. Effect of different crops intercropping with flue-cured tobacco on tobacco black shank d disease [J]. Tob. Sci. China, 2015, 36(3):77-79. | |
18 | 彭晟,陈兴,杨莹,等.间作芳香植物对烤烟农艺和经济性状的影响初探[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2014,29(1):144-148. |
PENG S, CHEN X, YANG Y, et al.. The preliminary study on effect of intercropping tobacco with aromatic plants on a gronomic and economic characters [J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2014, 29(1):144-148. | |
19 | 唐世凯,刘丽芳,李永梅,郑毅.烤烟间套草木樨、甘薯对烟叶产量和品质的影响[J].云南农业大学学报,2005(4):518-521, 533. |
TANG S K, LIU L F, LI Y M, et al.. Effects of intercropped with Platycodon on main agronomic traits and economic benefit of flue-cured tobacco [J]. J. Yunnan Agric.Univ., 2005(4):518-521, 533. | |
20 | 曲运琴, 姚勇, 任东植,等.晋南半夏与小麦玉米间套作模式研究[J].山西农业科学,2012,40(4):357-360, 374. |
QU Y Q, YAO Y, REN D Z, et al.. Intercropping patterns of wheat/Pinellia ternate/corn in Southern Shanxi [J]. Shanxi Agric. Sci., 2012, 40(4):357-360, 374. |
[1] | Yaqiang HU, Ya YUAN, Luwei YANG, Xuelai ZHANG, Shaopeng QIU, Xinyao YU. Study on Hot Air Drying System for Implantable Alfalfa Bales [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 105-112. |
[2] | Zhigang ZHENG, Li XIANG, Gongyi LIU, Cai XU, Bin QIN, Weiqin WANG, Huabin ZHENG, Qiyuan TANG. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Density on Growth and Yield of Orderly Machine-thrown Early Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 132-143. |
[3] | Yaxuan MENG, Wei MA, Xuhang YAO, Yingqi SUN, Xin ZHONG, Shan HUANG, Qiaoyun WENG, Yinghui LIU, Jincheng YUAN. Study on the Response Factors of Maize Yield to Nitrogen Fertilizer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 153-160. |
[4] | Dongmeng ZHANG, Dongping YAO, Jun WU, Qiuhong LUO, Wen ZHUANG, Xionglun LIU, Qiyun DENG, Bin BAI. Effect of Natural Low Temperature on Cooking and Eating Quality of Rice During Grain Filling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 144-153. |
[5] | Yilin YANG, Junxiong DING, Xiaohua WU, Peng WANG, Dongliang SUN, Xinyao YU, Zhentao ZHANG, Dong LI. Optimization of Hot-air Drying Process Parameters of Lentinus edodes Based on Response Surface [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 154-164. |
[6] | PANG Zhe, WANG Qilong, LI Juan. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties, Rice Yield and Economic Benefits in Low-lying Saline Alkali Land in Northern Shaanxi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 174-180. |
[7] | Panpan ZHANG, Chuan LI, Meiwei ZHANG, Xia ZHAO, Jun NIU, Jiangfang QIAO. Effect of Nitrification Inhibitor Application on Nitrogen Accumulation and Transportation and Grain Yield of Summer Maize Under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 181-189. |
[8] | Shijiang ZHU, Hu LI, Wen XU, Yating FENG. Effects of Soil Moisture Content on Fruit Quality in Citrus Orchards Within Three Gorges Reservoir Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 201-207. |
[9] | Zhongxiu RAO, Jimin SUN, Na ZHANG, Longtao LI, Chunhua DONG, Zengping YANG, Fengqiu HUANG. Impacts from Adding Artemisia argyi Straw into Substrates on Growth and Quality of Pleurotus ostreatus [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 208-215. |
[10] | Yongyan LIU, Zhengxiong SONG, Jiawei JIN, Jing WANG, Min XU, Junxue ZHOU, Zhanmin LI, Shimin ZHAO, Yunpeng FU, Xiaoyan DAI. Effects of Molybdenum and Zinc Nutrition on Physiological Characteristics and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 216-224. |
[11] | Xiangdong WANG, Daqi LIANG, Yanzhi MA. Comparison and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit and Seed Kernel Quality of Sour Jujube (Ziziphus acidojujuba C.Y. Cheng et M.J.Liu) from Different Producing Areas [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 50-58. |
[12] | Lu TIAN, Xiaoxia GUO, Wenbin SU, Chunyan HUANG, Zhi LI, Peng ZHANG, Caiyuan JIAN, Jia LIU, Dejuan KONG, Kang HAN. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Continuous Cropping Sugar Beet [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 192-203. |
[13] | Chen CHEN, Ke SHI, Changwei ZHU, Guiying JIANG, Lan LUO, Weiwei MENG, Fang LIU, Fengmin SHEN, Shiliang LIU. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Wheat Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield, and Soil Nitrogen Content in Fluvo-aquic Soil in Northern Henan Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 24-33. |
[14] | Yanjun KE, Yumeng ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Zitao ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Combined with Subsoiling on Farmland Soil Fertility and Crop Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 157-166. |
[15] | Zhengran SUN, Cuiping ZHANG, Jinli ZHANG, Hao WU, Xiuyan LIU, Zhenkai WANG, Yuzhen YANG, Daohua HE. Effects of Chemical Detopping on Cotton Plant Growth in Guanzhong Cotton Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 167-177. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||