Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Polyaspartic Acid on Nitrogen Utilization， Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0553

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to determine the effect of polyaspartic acid （PASP） on the efficiency and quality of flue-cured tobacco production under the condition of reduced nitrogen application， a split-plot experiment was conducted with ‘Honghua Dajinyuan’ as the test material. 4 nitrogen application treatments were set up， including the conventional nitrogen application （N1） and nitrogen reduction rates of 10% （N2）， 15% （N3） and 20% （N4） on the basis of conventional nitrogen application. At the same time， 0.0% （P1）， 2.5% （P2）， 5.0% （P3） and 7.5% （P4） PASP were applied， respectively. The effects of PASP on nitrogen utilization， yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco under nitrogen reduction were studied. The results showed that， with the decrease of nitrogen application rate， the growth and development of tobacco plants became weaker， the SPAD value， nitrogen absorption and accumulation， yield and nitrogen apparent utilization decreased， the nitrogen physiological utilization increased， the sugar content of flue-cured tobacco leaves increased， the nicotine and total nitrogen content decreased， and the smoking power became smaller. Under same nitrogen conditions， with the increase of PASP ratio， the agronomic indexes of tobacco plants were significantly improved. Compared with no PASP， SPAD value and yield of P4 treatment increased by 10.08%~18.44% and 7.54%~9.44%， respectively， and the apparent utilization rate and agronomic utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer were increased by 56.21%~72.59% and 21.61%~28.38%， respectively. The smoking quality of tobacco leaves of PASP treatments under nitrogen reduction condition was better. In conclusion， the yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco leaves treated with 5.0% PASP under the condition of 15% nitrogen reduction were similar to the conventional nitrogen application without adding PASP treatment， and the nitrogen utilization rate increased， the quality of flue-cured tobacco was better.

Key words: flue-cured tobacco, reducing nitrogen application, polyaspartic acid （PASP）, nitrogen use efficiency, yield and quality

摘要：

为明确烤烟生产上施用聚天冬氨酸（polyaspartic acid，PASP）对减施氮肥条件下的增效提质作用，以‘红花大金元’为供试材料进行裂区试验，设置常规施氮（N1）及在常规施氮的基础上减氮10%（N2）、15%（N3）、20%（N4）4个施氮量处理，同时分别配施0.0%（P1）、2.5%（P2）、5.0%（P3）、7.5%（P4）的PASP，研究减氮条件下施用PASP对烤烟氮素利用及产质量的影响。结果表明，随着施氮量的减少，烟株生长发育变弱，叶片SPAD值和氮素吸收积累量降低，产量减少，氮肥表观利用率下降，生理利用率升高，烤后叶片糖含量升高，烟碱和总氮含量降低，劲头变小。等氮条件下，随着配施PASP比例的增加，烟株农艺指标明显改善，与不添加PASP相比，P4处理的SPAD值提高10.08%~18.44%，产量增加7.54%~9.44%，氮肥表观利用率和农学效率分别提高56.21%~72.59%和21.61%~28.38%，减氮条件下添加PASP烤后烟叶的吸食品质更好。综合来看，减氮15%条件下配施5.0% PASP处理烤后烟叶的产量和产值与常规施氮不添加PASP处理相当，同时氮肥利用率提高，烤烟质量较优。

关键词: 烤烟, 减氮, 聚天冬氨酸（PASP）, 氮肥利用率, 产质量

CLC Number:

S572

Junya DUAN, Yuanyuan ZHAO, Tingting WANG, Jianyu WEI, Zheng WANG, Dexun WANG, Juan LI, Hongzhi SHI. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Polyaspartic Acid on Nitrogen Utilization， Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 227-238.

段俊雅, 赵园园, 王婷婷, 韦建玉, 王政, 王德勋, 李娟, 史宏志. 减氮配施聚天冬氨酸对烤烟氮素利用及产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 227-238.

Figures/Tables 8

References 34

1	陈治锋,肖汉乾,邓小华,等.促根减氮施肥模式对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,49(1):12-17.
	CHEN Z F, XIAO H Q, DENG X H, et al.. Effects of fertilization models of root-promoting and nitrogen-reduction on the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2023, 49(1):12-17.
2	赖佳鑫,邓华,刘峰,等.化肥减施配施有机肥对烤烟产质量和化学成分的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(6):73-78.
3	张金峰,谭小兵,吕世保,等.化肥减量配施炭基肥对烤烟产质量及土壤酶活性的影响[J].南方农业学报,2022,53(11):3079-3087.
	ZHANG J F, TAN X B, LYU S B, et al.. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with biocharsbased fertilizers on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco and soil enzyme activity [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2022, 53(11):3079-3087.
4	王琦,许艳丽,闫鹏,等.聚天门冬氨酸和壳聚糖复配剂对东北春谷农艺性状、产量及氮素利用的影响[J].作物杂志,2023(1):58-67.
	WANG Q, XU Y L, YAN P, et al.. Effects of polyaspartic acid-chitosan on agronomic traits,yield and nitrogen use of spring foxtail millet [J]. Crops, 2023 (1):58-67.
5	朱梦真,韩路,代雅琦,等.聚天冬氨酸保水剂对胡杨光合特性的影响[J].林业资源管理,2021(4):149-156.
	ZHU M Z, HAN L, DAI Y Q, et al.. Effects of polyaspartic acid water-retaining agent on photosynthetic characteristics of Populus euphratica [J]. For. Resour. Manage., 2021 (4):149-156.
6	王琦,许艳丽,闫鹏,等.聚天门冬氨酸和壳聚糖复配剂对谷子光合特性、氮素利用率及产量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(3):643-652.
	WANG Q, XU Y L, YAN P, et al.. Effects of polyaspartic acid and chitosan copolymer on photosynthetic characteristics, nitrogen use efficiency, and yield of foxtail millet [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2023, 42(3):643-652.
7	吴照祥,刘巧丽,钟永达,等.聚天冬氨酸对蒲公英干旱胁迫的缓解效应[J].江西农业大学学报,2023,45(4):866-874.
	WU Z X, LIU Q L, ZHONG Y D, et al.. Alleviation of polyaspartic acid on dandelion (Taraxacum mongolicum) suffering from drought stress [J]. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis, 2023, 45(4):866-874.
8	YAN P, FANG M, LU L, et al.. Effect of urea coated with polyaspartic acid on the yield and nitrogen use efficiency of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench.) [J]. Plants, 2022, 11(13):1724-1732.
9	王娜,徐嘉翼,张鑫,等.聚天门冬氨酸尿素对水稻产量及田面水氮素变化的综合影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(1):96-103.
	WANG N, XU J Y, ZHANG X, et al.. Effects of polyaspartic acid urea on rice yield and nitrogen concentrations in paddy field ponding water [J]. J. Agric. Resour. Environ., 2021, 38(1):96-103.
0	侯晓娜,王旭.黄腐酸和聚天冬氨酸对蕹菜氮素吸收及氮肥去向的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2014(1):48-52.
	HOU X N, WANG X. Effects of fulvic acid and polyaspartic acid on nitrogen uptake and fate of nitrogen fertilizer in water spinach [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2014 (1):48-52.
11	刘媛,袁亮,张水勤,等.不同分子量聚天冬氨酸对小麦根系生长和养分吸收的影响[J].中国农业科学,2022,55(13):2526-2537.
	LIU Y, YUAN L, ZHANG S Q, et al.. Effects of polyaspartic acid with different molecular weights on root growth and nutrient uptake of wheat [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2022, 55(13):2526-2537.
12	朱凌宇,徐荣,张家宏,等.聚天冬氨酸增效复合肥在小麦上的应用效果[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(6):132-134.
13	王亮亮,高志山,宋涛.聚天冬氨酸和生根剂复配对玉米根系及幼苗生长的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(22):67-69.
14	曹丹,王世震,韩梅.绿色环保肥料增效剂聚天冬氨酸对杨树幼苗生长的影响[J].植物研究,2021,41(5):712-720.
	CAO D, WANG S Z, HAN M. Effect of the environment-friendly nutrient synergist polyaspartic acid on the growth of poplar seedlings [J]. Bull. Bot. Res., 2021, 41(5):712-720.
15	唐会会,许艳丽,王庆燕,等.聚天门冬氨酸螯合氮肥减量基施对东北春玉米的增效机制[J].作物学报,2019,45(3):431-442.
	TANG H H, XU Y L, WANG Q Y, et al.. Increasing spring maize yield by basic application of PASP chelating nitrogen fertilizer in northeast China [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2019, 45(3):431-442.
16	曹本福,桂阳,祖庆学,等.减量施肥下聚天冬氨酸对烤烟生长、产量及养分吸收的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2018,39(5):57-63.
	CAO B F, GUI Y, ZU Q X,et al.. Effects of polyaspartic acid on growth, yield and nutrient absorption of flue-cured tobacco with reduced fertilization [J]. Chin. Tob. Sci., 2018, 39(5):57-63.
17	李淮源,杜晓辉,袁长才,等.钾肥减量条件下配施PASP对土壤理化特性及烤烟钾素吸收利用的影响[J].烟草科技,2023,56(2):1-10.
	LI H Y, DU X H, YUAN C C, et al.. Effects of potassium fertilizer reduction combined with supplement of polyaspartic acid on soil physicochemical properties, potassium absorption and utilization of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Tob. Sci. Technol., 2023, 56(2):1-10.
18	国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
19	任梦娟,段卫东,孙军伟,等.减氮条件下喷施壳寡糖对烤烟氮素利用率及烟叶品质的影响[J].烟草科技,2018,51(11):14-19.
	REN M J, DUAN W D, SUN J W, et al.. Effects of reduced nitrogen application rate combined with chitooligosaccharide spraying on nitrogen utilization efficiency and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Tob. Sci. Technol., 2018, 51(11):14-19.
20	杜彩艳,吴迪,周文兵,等.施氮水平对抚仙湖流域植烟区烤烟产质量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021(6):197-205.
	DU C Y, WU D, ZHOU W B, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application level on yield, quality, nitrogen absorption and utilization of flue-cured tobacco in the tobacco-planting area of Fuxian lake [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2021 (6):197-205.
21	荣仕宾,赵园园,秦艳青,等.留叶数与调制方式互作对四川茄芯烟叶烟草特有亚硝胺含量和香气质量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2023,36(2):306-313.
	RONG S B, ZHAO Y Y, QIN Y Q, et al.. Effects of interaction between number of leaves and curing methods on TSNAs content and aroma quality of Sichuan cigar filler [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2023, 36(2):306-313.
22	国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品标准体系: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
23	国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品感官评价方法: [S].北京:中国标准出版,1998.
24	杨红云,郭紫微,郭高飞,等.基于Stacking集成卷积神经网络的水稻氮素营养诊断[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2023,29(3):573-581.
	YANG H Y, GUO Z W, GUO G F, et al.. Rice nitrogen nutrition diagnosis based on stacking integrated convolutional neural network [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2023, 29(3):573-581.
25	刘凡,刘斌祥,郭宗翔,等.滴灌减氮对四川盆地玉米吐丝后叶片衰老和物质积累的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(3):179-185, 194.
	LIU F, LIU B X, GUO Z X, et al.. Effects of nitrogen reduction by drip irrigation on leaf senescence and matter accumulation of maize after silking in Sichuan basin [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2023, 41(3):179-185, 194.
26	司伟娜,高梦,程振,等.玉米叶片早衰突变体les1的生理特性及基因初步定位[J].玉米科学,2021,29(5):50-56.
	SI W N, GAO M, CHENG Z, et al.. Physiological characteristics and preliminary gene mapping of maize leaf premature senescence mutant les1 [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2021, 29(5):50-56.
27	DU Z, YANG H, WANG S, et al.. Advance of homologous polypeptides polyaspartic acids for agriculture [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crop, 2011, 12: 2381-2384.
28	PAN S, HUANG S, ZHAI J, et al.. Effects of N management on yield and N uptake of rice in Central China [J]. Integr. Agric., 2012, 11:1993-2000.
29	穰中文,李思纯,刘佳,等.种植密度与施氮量对烟田小气候及烟株光合特性的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,45(3):258-263.
	RANG Z W, LI S C, LIU J, et al.. Effects of planting density and nitrogen application on microclimate and photosynthetic characteristics of tobacco plants in tobacco field [J]. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2019, 45(3):258-263.
30	金佳威,刘咏艳,王惠,等.施氮量和留叶数对烤烟LY1306上部叶生理特性及产质量的影响[J].山东农业科学,2023,55(4):56-64.
	JIN J W, LIU Y Y, WANG H, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and retained leaf number on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco LY1306 [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2023, 55(4):56-64.
31	唐江华,苏丽丽,徐文修,等.氮肥减施对棉花产量、干物质生产与氮素吸收利用的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(2):86-95.
	TANG J H, SU L L, XU W X, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on cotton yield, dry matter production and nitrogen uptake and utilization [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2023, 41(2):86-95.
32	钱彩虹,陈立,李春燕,等.减量施氮对稻茬红皮强筋小麦产量、品质和氮盈亏的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(9):75-81.
33	高嘉宁,张丹,杨蒙岭,等.氮、磷、钾配施对烟叶生物量和品质成分含量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2021,34(6):1269-1276.
	GAO J N, ZHANG D, YANG M L, et al.. Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on biomass and quality components content of tobacco leaves [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2021, 34(6):1269-1276.
34	黄佳,李信,王子一,等.种植密度和施氮量对烤烟碳氮代谢关键酶及品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(9):82-88.

处理 Treatment		施氮量 Nitrogen application rate/（kg·hm^-2）	PASP用量 PASP application rate/（g·hm^-2）
N1	P1	75.00	0.00
	P2		1 875.00
	P3		3 750.00
	P4		5 625.00
N2	P1	67.50	0.00
	P2		1 687.50
	P3		3 375.00
	P4		5 062.50
N3	P1	63.75	0.00
	P2		1 593.75
	P3		3 187.50
	P4		4 781.25
N4	P1	60.00	0.00
	P2		1 500.00
	P3		3 000.00
	P4		4 500.00

处理 Treatment		施氮量 Nitrogen application rate/（kg·hm^-2）	PASP用量 PASP application rate/（g·hm^-2）
N1	P1	75.00	0.00
	P2		1 875.00
	P3		3 750.00
	P4		5 625.00
N2	P1	67.50	0.00
	P2		1 687.50
	P3		3 375.00
	P4		5 062.50
N3	P1	63.75	0.00
	P2		1 593.75
	P3		3 187.50
	P4		4 781.25
N4	P1	60.00	0.00
	P2		1 500.00
	P3		3 000.00
	P4		4 500.00

处理Treatment		株高 Plant height	茎围 Stem girth	节距 Pitch	最大叶长 Maximum leaf length	最大叶宽 Maximum leaf width
N1	P1	59.73±1.97 g	8.97±0.12 cde	4.51±0.14 efg	64.13±0.82 efg	32.13±0.70 cdefg
	P2	64.60±1.37 de	9.20±0.08 abc	4.60±0.01 def	65.77±0.17 cde	32.47±0.26 bcdef
	P3	69.33±0.94 bc	9.37±0.12 ab	4.89±0.09 bc	68.27±2.88 abc	33.33±0.29 bc
	P4	72.67±0.47 a	9.50±0.14 a	5.34±0.08 a	70.77±0.54 a	35.13±0.76 a
	均值Mean	66.58	9.26	4.84	67.24	33.27
N2	P1	57.33±1.25 h	8.50±0.08 fg	4.31±0.13 g	62.83±0.59 efgh	30.97±0.73 efgh
	P2	62.17±1.31 f	8.77±0.31 defg	4.50±0.05 fg	64.70±0.91 def	31.10±0.22 efgh
	P3	68.17±1.03 c	9.23±0.21 abc	4.76±0.09 bcd	67.17±1.43 bcd	32.60±0.85 bcde
	P4	70.67±1.25 ab	9.30±0.08 abc	4.93±0.07 b	68.83±0.62 ab	33.80±0.91 ab
	均值Mean	64.59	8.95	4.63	65.88	32.12
N3	P1	54.33±0.47 i	8.47±0.17 g	4.03±0.08 h	61.23±0.61 gh	30.50±0.57 gh
	P2	60.67±0.47 fg	8.73±0.21 defg	4.40±0.05 fg	63.90±0.42 efg	30.90±0.29 fgh
	P3	65.17±0.62 d	9.03±0.12 bcd	4.60±0.15 def	65.27±2.30 cdef	32.40±1.13 bcdef
	P4	69.67±1.25 bc	9.27±0.05 abc	4.85±0.03 bc	67.67±1.20 bcd	32.80±0.51 bcd
	均值Mean	62.46	8.88	4.47	64.52	31.65
N4	P1	51.63±0.85 j	8.43±0.17 g	3.87±0.13 h	60.03±0.99 h	28.33±0.97 i
	P2	59.67±1.25 g	8.67±0.05 efg	4.31±0.07 g	62.50±0.93 fgh	30.10±1.10 h
	P3	62.67±0.47 ef	8.83±0.12 def	4.54±0.03 ef	64.07±1.92 efg	31.57±0.37 defgh
	P4	68.00±0.82 c	9.23±0.05 abc	4.71±0.10 cde	65.90±0.71 bcde	32.10±0.37 cdefg
	均值Mean	60.49	8.79	4.36	63.13	30.53
	N	**	**	**	**	**
	P	**	**	**	**	**
	N×P	*	ns	ns	ns	ns

处理Treatment		株高 Plant height	茎围 Stem girth	节距 Pitch	最大叶长 Maximum leaf length	最大叶宽 Maximum leaf width
N1	P1	59.73±1.97 g	8.97±0.12 cde	4.51±0.14 efg	64.13±0.82 efg	32.13±0.70 cdefg
	P2	64.60±1.37 de	9.20±0.08 abc	4.60±0.01 def	65.77±0.17 cde	32.47±0.26 bcdef
	P3	69.33±0.94 bc	9.37±0.12 ab	4.89±0.09 bc	68.27±2.88 abc	33.33±0.29 bc
	P4	72.67±0.47 a	9.50±0.14 a	5.34±0.08 a	70.77±0.54 a	35.13±0.76 a
	均值Mean	66.58	9.26	4.84	67.24	33.27
N2	P1	57.33±1.25 h	8.50±0.08 fg	4.31±0.13 g	62.83±0.59 efgh	30.97±0.73 efgh
	P2	62.17±1.31 f	8.77±0.31 defg	4.50±0.05 fg	64.70±0.91 def	31.10±0.22 efgh
	P3	68.17±1.03 c	9.23±0.21 abc	4.76±0.09 bcd	67.17±1.43 bcd	32.60±0.85 bcde
	P4	70.67±1.25 ab	9.30±0.08 abc	4.93±0.07 b	68.83±0.62 ab	33.80±0.91 ab
	均值Mean	64.59	8.95	4.63	65.88	32.12
N3	P1	54.33±0.47 i	8.47±0.17 g	4.03±0.08 h	61.23±0.61 gh	30.50±0.57 gh
	P2	60.67±0.47 fg	8.73±0.21 defg	4.40±0.05 fg	63.90±0.42 efg	30.90±0.29 fgh
	P3	65.17±0.62 d	9.03±0.12 bcd	4.60±0.15 def	65.27±2.30 cdef	32.40±1.13 bcdef
	P4	69.67±1.25 bc	9.27±0.05 abc	4.85±0.03 bc	67.67±1.20 bcd	32.80±0.51 bcd
	均值Mean	62.46	8.88	4.47	64.52	31.65
N4	P1	51.63±0.85 j	8.43±0.17 g	3.87±0.13 h	60.03±0.99 h	28.33±0.97 i
	P2	59.67±1.25 g	8.67±0.05 efg	4.31±0.07 g	62.50±0.93 fgh	30.10±1.10 h
	P3	62.67±0.47 ef	8.83±0.12 def	4.54±0.03 ef	64.07±1.92 efg	31.57±0.37 defgh
	P4	68.00±0.82 c	9.23±0.05 abc	4.71±0.10 cde	65.90±0.71 bcde	32.10±0.37 cdefg
	均值Mean	60.49	8.79	4.36	63.13	30.53
	N	**	**	**	**	**
	P	**	**	**	**	**
	N×P	*	ns	ns	ns	ns

处理 Treatment		产量 Yield/（kg·hm^-2）	均价/（元·kg^-1） Mean price/（yuan·kg^-1）	产值/（元·hm^-2） Output value/（yuan·hm^-2）	中上等烟比例 Proportion of medium and high quality tobacco/%
N1	P1	2 027.70±28.29 efg	39.19±0.71 efg	79 465.50±640.79 g	93.81±1.45 e
	P2	2 110.05±32.70 cd	40.55±0.57 a	85 562.55±638.83 c	95.60±0.63 a
	P3	2 188.05±89.90 ab	40.25±0.79 ab	88 069.05±672.51 a	95.43±1.37 a
	P4	2 219.10±42.38 a	39.36±0.42 def	87 343.80±645.56 b	93.98±0.86 de
	均值Mean	2 136.23	39.84	85 110.23	94.71
N2	P1	1 985.40±32.46 fgh	37.90±0.69 i	75 246.60±552.36 i	92.27±0.72 g
	P2	2 075.25±32.46 de	38.73±0.32 gh	80 374.50±412.62 f	92.78±1.40 g
	P3	2 102.25±23.64 cd	39.96±0.29 bc	84 005.85±682.18 d	94.75±1.19 bc
	P4	2 146.80±36.62 bc	39.82±0.19 bcd	85 485.60±1 216.91 c	94.64±1.36 bcd
	均值Mean	2 077.43	39.10	81 278.14	93.61
N3	P1	1 906.80±26.33 ij	37.75±0.15 i	71 981.70±685.24 k	92.21±1.12 g
	P2	1 988.10±23.39 fgh	38.61±0.36 h	76 760.55±700.68 h	92.40±1.05 g
	P3	2 014.80±15.06 efg	39.54±0.25 cde	79 665.15±993.76 g	94.13±1.11 cde
	P4	2 050.50±27.56 def	40.17±0.73 ab	82 368.60±1 077.29 e	95.13±1.61 ab
	均值Mean	1 990.05	39.02	77 694.00	93.47
N4	P1	1 808.70±31.23 k	37.72±0.16 i	68 224.20±834.17 l	92.18±1.54 g
	P2	1 901.10±38.58 j	38.59±0.81 h	73 363.50±618.13 j	92.30±1.18 g
	P3	1 944.45±28.29 hij	38.75±0.20 gh	75 347.40±641.64 i	92.84±0.66 fg
	P4	1 969.65±25.84 ghi	38.82±0.76 fgh	76 461.75±1 040.67 h	93.45±1.37 ef
	均值Mean	1 905.98	38.47	73 349.21	92.69
	N	**	**	**	**
	P	**	**	**	**
	N×P	ns	**	**	**