Effects of Microbial Fertilizer and Humic Acid Compound Fertilizer on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Lilium

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0704

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of microbial fertilizer and humic acid compound fertilizer on the growth， photosynthetic characteristics， and bulb quality of Lilium， and to determine suitable fertilization amounts， a field micro-plot experiment was conducted using Lilium tissue-cultured seedlings. 8 treatments were set up， including humic acid compound fertilizer at 10 （F-1）， 30 （F-2）， 50 g·m^-2 （F-3）， microbial fertilizer at 30 （J-1）， 60 （J-2）， 90 g·m^-2 （J-3）， humic acid compound fertilizer 30 g·m^-2+microbial fertilizer 30 g·m^-2 （H）， and a water control（CK）. The effects of different treatments on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Lilium plants were compared and analyzed. The results showed that， compared with CK， the application of microbial fertilizer and humic acid compound fertilizer promoted the growth and development of both the aboveground and underground parts of Lilium to varying degrees. Among them， the H treatment significantly increased the circumference， fresh weight， root length， number of lateral roots and stem thickness of Lilium bulbs， which were 1.76， 3.78， 1.61， 1.85 and 1.58 times that of CK， respectively. The application of microbial fertilizer and humic acid compound fertilizer significantly increased the chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate （P_n） of Lilium， with the H treatment having the highest chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents， which were 2.31 and 2.64 times that of CK， respectively， and the P_n of J-2 and J-3 treatments being the highest， 148.72% and 172.96% higher than that of CK. The stomatal conductance （G_s）， transpiration rate （T_r） and water use efficiency （WUE） of the microbial fertilizer-treated plants were significantly increased compared to CK， while the intercellular CO₂ concentration （C_i） was significantly reduced， with the G_s and T_r of J-2 treatment being the highest， 50.00% and 65.47% higher than that of CK. The application of microbial fertilizer and humic acid compound fertilizer effectively increased the sucrose， starch， and soluble protein contents of Lilium bulbs， with the sucrose and protein contents of F-3 treatment being the highest， and the starch content of J-3 treatment being the highest， increasing by 17.97%， 15.41% and 9.20% compared to CK， respectively. Through principal component analysis and membership function analysis， it was concluded that the comprehensive evaluation of Lilium indicators was best under H treatment. In summary， microbial fertilizer and humic acid compound fertilizer could effectively promote the growth and photosynthetic rate of Lilium， and improve the yield and quality of bulbs. When both were combined， the growth effect on Lilium ws the best. Above results provided a theoretical basis and technical support for the fertilization of Lilium bulbs.

Key words: Lilium, microbial fertilizer, humic acid compound fertilizer, bulb growth, photosynthetic characteristics

摘要：

为探索微生物菌肥和腐植酸复合肥对百合生长、光合特性及鳞茎品质的影响，并筛选适宜的施肥用量，以百合组培苗为材料，通过田间微区试验，设置8种处理，包括腐植酸复合肥10（F-1）、30（F-2）、50 g·m^-2（F-3），微生物菌肥30（J-1）、60（J-2）、90 g·m^-2（J-3），腐植酸复合肥30 g·m^-2+微生物菌肥30 g·m^-2（H）和清水对照（CK），对比分析不同处理对百合植株生长和光合特性的影响。结果表明，与CK相比，微生物菌肥和腐植酸复合肥不同程度地促进了百合地上和地下部分的生长发育，其中H处理显著增加了百合小鳞茎的周径、鲜重、根长、须根数和抽茎后植株的茎粗，分别是CK的1.76、3.78、1.61、1.85和1.58倍；施用微生物菌肥和腐植酸复合肥可显著提高百合叶片叶绿素含量和净光合速率（net photosynthetic rate，P_n），其中，H处理的叶绿素a和叶绿素b含量最高，分别是CK的2.31和2.64倍，J-2和J-3处理的P_n最大，分别较CK高148.72%、172.96%；微生物菌肥处理的气孔导度（stomatal conductance，G_s）、蒸腾速率（transpiration rate，T_r）和水分利用率（water use efficiency，WUE）显著高于CK，而胞间CO₂浓度（intercellular CO₂ concentration，C_i）显著降低，其中，J-2处理的G_s和T_r最高，分别较CK高50.00%和65.47%。施加微生物菌肥和腐植酸复合肥可有效提高百合鳞茎的蔗糖、淀粉和可溶性蛋白质含量，其中，F-3处理的蔗糖和蛋白质含量最高，J-3处理的淀粉含量最高，分别较CK增加17.97%、15.41%和9.20%。通过主成分分析和隶属函数得出，H处理下百合各指标的综合评价最好。综上所述，微生物菌肥和腐植酸复合肥可有效促进百合的生长发育和光合速率，提高鳞茎的产量和品质，二者配施对百合的生长效果最佳。研究结果为百合种球培育的施肥方法提供了理论依据和技术支撑。

关键词: 百合, 微生物菌肥, 腐植酸复合肥, 鳞茎生长, 光合特性

CLC Number:

S682

Xiaodan WU, Li GAO, Tiangeng GONG, Xiangfeng KONG, Yuzhou JIANG, Guixia JIA. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer and Humic Acid Compound Fertilizer on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Lilium[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(4): 221-229.

吴小丹, 高丽, 巩天耕, 孔祥凤, 姜雨舟, 贾桂霞. 微生物菌肥和腐植酸复合肥对百合生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(4): 221-229.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1 Growth indicators of Lilium aboveground and underground parts under fertilization treatments

处理 Treatment	叶片数 Leaves number	叶面积 Leaf area /cm²	根数 Roots number	根长 Root length/cm	须根数 Fibrous roots number	鳞茎周径 Bulb circumference/cm	鳞茎鲜重 Fresh bulb weight/g
CK	5.00±2.31	213.25±27.40 dC	9.00±1.16 bcA	6.02±0.80 cB	3.00±0.58 dC	4.36±0.38 cB	1.59±0.05 fD
F-1	5.00±2.31	311.40±83.37 bcAB	11.00±1.73 abcA	7.37±0.47 bcAB	16.00±1.00 cBC	5.74±1.25 bcAB	2.87±0.64 dCD
F-2	7.00±3.32	330.67±56.07 abcAB	7.00±2.65 cA	8.63±0.98 abA	30.00±4.36 bB	6.57±0.26 abAB	4.33±0.31 cABC
F-3	6.00±2.58	280.13±66.62 cB	14.00±5.69 aA	8.35±0.27 abAB	26.00±13.01 bcB	6.38±0.40 abAB	3.82±0.30 cdBC
J-1	5.00±2.90	314.64±59.03 bcAB	10.00±1.16 abcA	7.84±0.21 bAB	26.00±7.00 bcB	6.51±0.77 abAB	4.71±1.05 abcAB
J-2	7.00±2.43	352.37±55.15 abA	10.00±2.00 abcA	8.79±0.95 abA	23.00±7.81 bcB	7.18±0.57 abA	4.64±0.12 bcAB
J-3	6.00±2.17	380.29±56.21 aA	10.00±1.00 abcA	9.15±1.49 abA	33.00±4.73 bB	7.25±1.30 abA	5.79±1.08 abA
H	6.00±2.46	315.78±58.59 bcAB	14.00±3.51 abA	9.71±1.41 aA	49.00±5.03 aA	7.65±1.54 aA	6.01±0.90 aA

Fig. 1 Growth status of Liliums under different fertilization treatments.

Table 2 Growth indicators of Lilium aboveground parts in the second year under fertilization

处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	茎粗 Stem diameter/mm	现蕾率 Present bud rate/%
CK	39.71±1.87 fE	3.62±0.60 eD	13.2
F-1	46.83±1.48 eD	3.80±0.33 deD	16.3
F-2	56.13±1.63 aA	4.98±0.73 bB	21.3
F-3	53.64±1.92 bcBC	5.70±0.49 aA	30.1
J-1	52.39±1.76 cdBC	3.74±0.41 deD	14.9
J-2	54.08±0.92 bB	4.11±0.42 cdCD	18.9
J-3	53.04±1.33 bcBC	4.52±0.48 cBC	29.8
H	52.04±1.43 dC	5.71±0.59 aA	33.9

Fig. 2 Chlorophyll contents of Lilium leaves under fertilization treatmentsNote： Different lowercase letters in same index indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.

Table 3 Photosynthetic indexes of Lilium plants under fertilization treatments

处理 Treatment	净光合速率 P_n/（μmol·m²·s^-¹）	气孔导度 G_s/（μmol·m²·s^-¹）	胞间CO₂浓度 C_i/（μmol·mol^-¹）	蒸腾速率 T_r/（mmol·m²·s^-¹）	水分利用效率 WUE/（µmol·mmol^-1）
CK	3.92±0.38 c	0.10±0.01 c	322.63±3.01 a	3.62±0.63 bc	1.14±0.44 b
F-1	6.03±0.92 b	0.10±0.04 c	278.24±36.91 ab	3.47±0.83 bc	1.78±0.26 ab
F-2	6.25±0.71 b	0.11±0.03 ab	289.47±38.20 ab	3.77±0.84 bc	1.72±0.40 ab
F-3	6.58±0.95 b	0.09±0.02 c	252.99±18.56 bc	3.47±0.87 bc	1.94±0.29 ab
J-1	7.34±0.75 b	0.11±0.04 ab	264.66±54.99 bc	3.08±1.02 c	2.67±1.22 a
J-2	9.75±1.66 a	0.15±0.03 a	268.09±10.38 bc	5.99±1.04 a	1.64±0.15 ab
J-3	10.70±2.59 a	0.12±0.03 ab	226.82±44.28 c	4.67±1.56 b	2.62±1.36 a
H	6.67±1.00 b	0.10±0.02 c	273.74±26.27 bc	2.89±0.78 c	2.40±0.45 a

Fig.3 Sucrose， starch and protein contents of Lilium bulbs under fertilization treatmentsNote： Different lowercase letters in same index indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.

Table 4 Comprehensive evaluation of different fertilization treatments

处理 Treatment	$X$ ：综合指标值 Value of composite indicator			$u$ ：隶属函数值 Value of the affiliation function			D：综合得分 Composite score	排序 Ranking
处理 Treatment	$X 1$	$X 2$	$X 3$	$u X 1$	$u X 2$	$u X 3$	D：综合得分 Composite score	排序 Ranking
CK	-2.04	0.19	-0.20	2.04	1.88	5.23	2.28	8
F-1	-0.76	0.18	0.74	3.39	1.88	6.49	3.37	7
F-2	0.19	-0.14	-2.34	4.37	1.68	2.34	3.70	5
F-3	0.48	1.67	0.52	4.68	2.77	6.20	4.45	2
J-1	-0.21	-0.89	0.64	3.96	1.24	6.35	3.65	6
J-2	0.52	-0.98	0.15	4.71	1.18	5.69	4.14	4
J-3	0.86	-1.11	0.50	5.07	1.11	6.17	4.42	3
H	0.96	1.07	-0.03	5.17	2.40	5.45	4.68	1

Table 4 Comprehensive evaluation of different fertilization treatments

处理 Treatment	$X$ ：综合指标值 Value of composite indicator			$u$ ：隶属函数值 Value of the affiliation function			D：综合得分 Composite score	排序 Ranking
处理 Treatment	$X 1$	$X 2$	$X 3$	$u X 1$	$u X 2$	$u X 3$	D：综合得分 Composite score	排序 Ranking
CK	-2.04	0.19	-0.20	2.04	1.88	5.23	2.28	8
F-1	-0.76	0.18	0.74	3.39	1.88	6.49	3.37	7
F-2	0.19	-0.14	-2.34	4.37	1.68	2.34	3.70	5
F-3	0.48	1.67	0.52	4.68	2.77	6.20	4.45	2
J-1	-0.21	-0.89	0.64	3.96	1.24	6.35	3.65	6
J-2	0.52	-0.98	0.15	4.71	1.18	5.69	4.14	4
J-3	0.86	-1.11	0.50	5.07	1.11	6.17	4.42	3
H	0.96	1.07	-0.03	5.17	2.40	5.45	4.68	1

References 38

1	顿昊阳,王继华,郑思乡,等.百合的营养特性与施肥[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(21):231-234.
	DUN H Y, WANG J H, ZHENG S X, et al.. A review for lily’s nutritional features and fertilization discipline [J]. Chin.Agric.Sci. Bull., 2010,26(21):231-234.
2	丁文成,何萍,周卫.我国新型肥料产业发展战略研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2023,29(2):201-219.
	DING W C, HE P, ZHOU W. Development strategies of the new-type fertilizer industry in China [J].J.Plant Nutr. Fert., 2023,29(2):201-219.
3	SINGH A, GUPTA R, PANDEY R.Rice seed priming with picomolar rutin enhances rhizospheric Bacillus subtilis CIM colonization and plant growth [J/OL]. PLoS One, 2016,11(1):e0146013 [2023-08-22]. .
4	CHOWDAPPA P, MOHAN KUMAR S P, JYOTHI LAKSHMI M,et al..Growth stimulation and induction of systemic resistance in tomato against early and late blight by Bacillus subtilis OTPB1 or Trichoderma harzianum OTPB3 [J].Biol.Contr., 2013,65(1):109-117.
5	MAHANTY T, BHATTACHARJEE S, GOSWAMI M,et al..Biofertilizers:a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development [J].Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2017,24(4):3315-3335.
6	李小玲,周武先,蒋小刚,等.微生物菌肥对川党参连作障碍及紫纹羽病的防控效果[J].中国农业科技导报,2023,25(3):119-131.
	LI X L, ZHOU W X, JIANG X G, et al.. Control effect of microbial fertilizers on the replanting disease and Helicobasidium mompa Tanaka of Codonopsis Tangshen oliv [J].J.Agric.Sci.Technol.,2023,25(3):119-131.
7	吴昀.基于离体模式体系的百合小鳞茎发生发育机制研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2016.
	WU Y. The mechanisms of lily bulblet initiation and development based on the in vitro model system [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2017.
8	JINDO K, OLIVARES F L, MALCHER D J D P, et al.. From lab to field: role of humic substances under open-field and greenhouse conditions as biostimulant andbiocontrol agent [J/OL]. Front. Plant Sci., 2020, 11:426[2023-08-22]. .
9	DEHITA D, FUENTES M, FERNANDEZ V, et al.. Discriminating the short-term action of root and foliar application ofhumic acids on plant growth: emerging role of jasmonic acid [J/OL]. Front. Plant. Sci., 2020, 11:493 [2023-08-22]. .
10	LI Y, FANG F, WEI J L, et al.. Humic acid fertilizer improved soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut:a three-year experiment [J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2019,9:12014 [2023-08-22]..
11	白志浩,雷治兵,张智敏,等.腐殖酸复合肥料在农作物中的应用研究进展[J].山东化工,2020,49(19):56-58.
	BAI Z H, LEI Z B, ZHANG Z M, et al.. Application and research progress of humic acid compound fertilizer in agricultural production [J]. Shandong Chem. Ind., 2020,49(19):56-58.
12	董向阳,王翼飞,余进洋,等. 含腐殖酸复合肥对大蒜产量和品质的影响[J]. 肥料与健康. 2022, 49(5): 52-54.
	DONG X Y, WANG Y F, YU J Y, et al.. Effects of compound fertilizer containing humic acid on garlic yield and quality [J]. Fert. Health., 2022, 49(5): 52-54.
13	张焕菊,高进华,胡照顺,等.复合肥中添加腐殖酸和微量元素在大葱生产上的应用效果[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(15):111-113.
14	王云霞.施肥对卷丹百合生长发育、养分吸收及活性成分的影响[D].银川:宁夏大学,2021.
	WANG Y X. Effects of fertilization growth and development, nutrient uptaking and active components of Lilium lancifolium [D]. Yinchan: Ningxia University, 2021.
15	高柱,王小玲,王斌,等.龙牙百合脱毒种球培育的施肥效应[J].中国瓜菜,2020,33(11):56-60.
	GAO Z, WANG X L, WANG B, et al.. Effects of fertilization on the non-virus bulb cultivation of Lilium brownii var.viridulum [J].China Cucurbits Veget., 2020,33(11):56-60.
16	李琦,马忠明.施肥对食用百合植株氮磷钾分布、鳞茎产量和品质影响的研究进展[J].中国土壤与肥料,2018(5):8-14.
	LI Q, MA Z M. Advance in the research of effects of fertilization on nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium distribution,bulb yield and quality in edible lily plants [J]. Soil Fertil. Sci. China, 2018(5):8-14.
17	崔光芬,杜文文,吴学尉,等.氮磷钾施肥水平对百合切花与籽球品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2021,37(19):65-70.
	CUI G F, DU W W, WU X Y, et al.. Effects of fertilization levels of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium on the quality of cut flowers and bulb-lets of lily [J].Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2021,37(19):65-70.
18	努尔凯麦尔·木拉提,杨亚杰,帕尔哈提·阿布都克日木,等.小麦叶绿素含量测定方法比较[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(9):156-159.
19	杨锐,许凯,张靖,等.考马斯亮蓝法检测γ-环糊精中酶残留[J].中国新药杂志,2022,31(13):1322-1325.
	YANG R, XU K, ZHANG J,et al..Determination of enzyme residues in γ-cyclodextrin by Bradford method [J]. Chin. J. New Drugs, 2022,31(13):1322-1325.
20	林先贵,王一明.腐植酸类物质是土壤健康的重要保障[J].腐植酸,2010(2):1-10.
	LIN X G, WANG Y M.Humic substance is a safeguard to healthy soil quality [J].Humic Acid, 2010(2):1-10.
21	武杞蔓,张金梅,李玥莹,等.有益微生物菌肥对农作物的作用机制研究进展[J].生物技术通报,2021,37(5):221-230.
	WU Q M, ZHANG J M, LI Y Y, et al.. Recent advances on the mechanism of beneficial microbial fertilizers in crops [J].Biotechnol. Bull., 2021,37(5):221-230.
22	赵奇丰,杨悦,邱欣悦,等. 腐植酸:结构性质、来源、制备与应用研究进展[J].中国科学:化学, 2023, 53(8):1437-1454.
	ZHAO Q F, YANG Y, QIU X Y, et al.. Humic acid: research progress in its structural properties, sources, preparation and application [J]. Sci. Sin. Chim., 2023, 53(8):1437-1454.
23	武杞蔓,刘朋宇,张颖,等. 微生物菌肥对番茄生长、品质及糖代谢相关酶的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学. 2022, 50(24): 125-130.
24	张建海,王向平,冯彬彬,等. 错株种植和增施菌肥对太白贝母光合特性、产量及品质的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2022,31(5):628-639.
	ZHANG J H, WANG X P, FENG B B, et al.. Effects of staggered planting and increasing bacterial fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality of Fritillaria taipaiensis P. Y. Li [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2022, 31(5):628-639.
25	张爱华,况胜剑,张钦,等.腐殖酸型复合肥对马铃薯生长及产质量的影响[J].耕作与栽培,2021,41(5):32-35.
	ZHANG A H, KUANG S J, ZHANG Q, et al.. Effect of humic acid compound fertilizer on potato growth status,yield and quality [J]. Till. Cult., 2021,41(5):32-35.
26	LI Y, FANG F, WEI J L, et al.. Physiological effects of humic acid in peanut growing in continuous cropping soil [J]. Agron. J., 2020,113(1):550-559.
27	石丽红,李超,唐海明,等.长期施肥方式对双季稻根系生理特性与产量的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(9):18-29.
	SHI L H, LI C, TANG H M, et al.. Effects of different long-term fertilizer management on physiological characteristic of root and yield of rice in double-cropping rice paddy field [J].J.China Agric.Univ., 2021,26(9):18-29.
28	刘瑞浩. 腐植酸肥、微生物菌肥和土壤调理剂对连作丹参产量和品质的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2022.
	LIU R H. Effects of humic acid, fertilizer and inorganic fertilizer and soil conditioner on yield and quality of Salvia miltiorrhiza continuous cropping [D]. Tai’‍an:Shandong Agricultural University, 2022.
29	李鹏程,苏学德,王晶晶,等. 腐植酸肥与菌肥配施对果园土壤性质及葡萄产量、品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2018(1):121-126.
	LI P C, SU X D, WANG J J, et al.. Effects of humic acid fertilizer and biological fertilizer on soil properties and grape yield and quality [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2018(1):121-126.
30	贺安娜,郭圣军,刘湘韩,等.林下栽培多花黄精的形态及光合特性比较[J].湖南生态科学学报,2021,8(4):8-14.
	HE A N, GUO S J, LIU X H, et al.. Comparison of the morphology and photosynthetic characteristics of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua under forest cultivation [J]. J.Hunan Ecol. Sci., 2021,8(4):8-14.
31	熊春霞,张静,蒋费涛,等.不同微生物菌肥处理对延胡索产量和品质的影响[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(5):1159-1168.
	XIONG C X, ZHANG J, JIANG F T, et al.. Effects of different microbial fertilizers on yield and quality of Corydalis yanhusuo W.T.Wang [J]. J. South. Agric., 2020,51(5):1159-1168.
32	赵雄伟,宫彬彬,徐昱松,等.基于主成分分析的腐殖酸添加浓度对番茄幼苗生长效果研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2021,44(2):41-47.
	ZHAO X W, GONG B B, XU Y S,et al..Effects of humic acid adding concentration on tomato seedling growth based on principal component analysis [J]. J. Hebei Agric. Univ., 2021,44(2):41-47.
33	杨梦秋,丁正亮,徐小牛,等.安徽油茶不同品种光合生理生态特性的研究[J].安徽农业大学学报,2011,38(3):448-452.
	YANG M Q, DING Z L, XU X N,et al..Eco-physiological characteristics of photosynthesis for the different varieties of Camellia oleifera in Anhui [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Univ., 2011,38(3):448-452.
34	陈琛,石柯,朱长伟,等.种植密度和施氮量对豫北潮土区小麦光合特性和产量及土壤氮素的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2023,25(5):24-33.
	CHEN C, SHI K, ZHU C W, et al.. Effects of planting density and nitrogen application rate on wheat photosynthetic characteristics,yield,and soil nitrogen content in fluvo-aquic soil in northern Henan province [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023,25(5):24-33.
35	蔡开朗,陈伟玉,姚海荣,等.施用光合菌对4种油茶品种生长及养分含量的影响[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(9):2610-2615.
	CAI K L, CHEN W Y, YAO H R,et al..Effects of application of photosynthetic bacteria and fertilizer on growth and nutrient content in Camellia vietnamensis [J].Chin. J. Trop.Crops,2021,42(9):2610-2615.
36	向芬,李维,刘红艳,等.氮素水平对不同品种茶树光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2018,38(6):1138-1145.
	XIANG F, LI W, LIU H Y,et al..Characteristics of photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence of tea varieties under different nitrogen application levels [J].Acta Bot.Bor-Occid. Sin., 2018,38(6):1138-1145.
37	马乐,姜雅轩,雷培,等. 生物菌肥对软枣猕猴桃品种‘魁绿’和‘佳绿’生长发育的影响[J].经济林研究,2022,40(2):183-190.
	MA L, JIANG Y X, LEI P, et al.. Effects of biological bacterial fertilizer on the growth and development of Actinidia arguta varieties ‘Kuilv’ and ‘Jialv' [J]. Non-wood. For. Res., 2022, 40(2):183-190.
38	SONG Q F, WANG Y, QU M N,et al..The impact of modifying photosystem antenna size on canopy photosynthetic efficiency [J].Plant Cell Environ., 2017,40(12):2946-2957.

[1]	Yanxia MA, Jingru CHEN, Xiaowei WANG, Yuxin ZHANG, Junfeng ZHANG, Jialin KUAI. Effects of Irrigation Lower Limit and Fertilizer Application Amount on Water Consumption and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Mini Chinese Cabbage Under Drip Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(3): 239-249.
[2]	Zhongyi LI, Hongqin TANG, Wenbin DONG, Caihui WEI, Tieguang HE. Effects of Co-incorporation of Rice Straw and Chinese Milk Vetch on Photosynthetic Characteristics， Yield and Quality of Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(2): 171-180.
[3]	Wei WANG, Qiang ZHAO, Abuduaini Munire·, Alimu·Amuli, Xinxin LI, Yangqing TIAN. Effects of Different Exogenous Substances on Chemical Capping and Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 57-68.
[4]	Qianqian LU, Abuduwaili Abulimiti, Yixing HOU, Zhihui LI, Shuang WANG, Long ZHOU. Research of the Photosynthetic Characteristics of 7 Table Grape Varieties Under Compound Salt-alkali Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 63-76.
[5]	Zhonghua MA, Juan CHEN, Na WU, Benju MAN, Xiaogang WANG, Yongqing ZHE, Jili LIU. Effects of Salt Stress and Phosphorus Supply on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Total Biomass of Switchgrass at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 190-200.
[6]	Lu TIAN, Xiaoxia GUO, Wenbin SU, Chunyan HUANG, Zhi LI, Peng ZHANG, Caiyuan JIAN, Jia LIU, Dejuan KONG, Kang HAN. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on Growth， Yield and Quality of Continuous Cropping Sugar Beet [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 192-203.
[7]	Chen CHEN, Ke SHI, Changwei ZHU, Guiying JIANG, Lan LUO, Weiwei MENG, Fang LIU, Fengmin SHEN, Shiliang LIU. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Wheat Photosynthetic Characteristics， Yield， and Soil Nitrogen Content in Fluvo-aquic Soil in Northern Henan Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 24-33.
[8]	Daokuan BAI, Baojian GUO, Yi HONG, Mengna ZHANG, Juan ZHU, Chao LYU, Feifei WANG, Rugen XU. Research on Mutagenic Mechanism and Genetic Mechanism of a Yellowing Mutant in Barley [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 34-45.
[9]	Xiaoling LI, Wuxian ZHOU, Xiaogang JIANG, Darong LI, Daye HUANG, Meide ZHANG. Control Effect of Microbial Fertilizers on the Replanting Disease and Helicobasidium mompa Tanaka of Codonopsis tangshen Oliv. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 119-131.
[10]	Tongmei GAO, Feng LI, Xiaoyu SU, Dongyong WANG, Yuan TIAN, Pengyu ZHANG, Tongke LI, Zihao YANG, Shuangling WEI. Effect of Nitrogen Reduction on Agronomic Trait， Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Sesame [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 176-188.
[11]	Xin WANG, Yuxia ZHANG, Weidong CHEN, Congying LIN, Wenhui HOU, Guleng SIRI, Baiming CONG. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing on Yield and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Different Forage Oat Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 170-179.
[12]	Fangling WANG, Mingyue ZHANG, Yaru ZHOU, Qinglin GUAN, Xinyan LI, Qiu ZHONG, Mingqin ZHAO. Effect of TS-PAA Water Retaining Agent on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Cigar under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 162-172.
[13]	Peng ZHONG, Lili MIAO, Jie LIU, Jianli WANG, Haiyan LU, Hongjiu YU, Nan ZHANG. Effect of Different Planting Densities and Patterns on Population Structure and Yield of Cyperusesculentus [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 186-196.
[14]	Zhidan WANG, Jili LIU, Na WU. Effects of Fenlong Tillage on Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Sweet Sorghum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 148-156.
[15]	CHEN Jun, ZHANG Qi, YANG Mengyu, YUAN Zhenyang. Impacts of Orchard Herbage-mulching on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Leaf Quality of Apples in Arid Desert Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(5): 160-167.