Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11): 180-190.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0126
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Weijian ZHANG(), Jingyi FENG, Yue LI, Wanying HE, Yanjing CHE, Ziying WANG, Xueyan BAI, Siyu GU(
)
Received:
2023-02-24
Accepted:
2024-07-12
Online:
2024-11-15
Published:
2024-11-19
Contact:
Siyu GU
张伟健(), 冯景翊, 李悦, 何婉莹, 车延静, 王紫颖, 白雪燕, 谷思玉(
)
通讯作者:
谷思玉
作者简介:
张伟健 E-mail:zwj18371121113@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Weijian ZHANG, Jingyi FENG, Yue LI, Wanying HE, Yanjing CHE, Ziying WANG, Xueyan BAI, Siyu GU. Effect of Endogenous and Exogenous Organic Matter on Phosphorus Adsorption and Availability in Black Soil[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(11): 180-190.
张伟健, 冯景翊, 李悦, 何婉莹, 车延静, 王紫颖, 白雪燕, 谷思玉. 内-外源有机质对黑土磷素吸附及有效性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(11): 180-190.
处理 Treatment | 有机质 SOM/(g·kg-1) | 全氮 TN/ (g·kg-1) | P / (g·kg-1) 全磷 T | N / (mg·kg-1) 碱解氮 A | 速效磷 AP/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 AK/ (mg·kg-1) | pH | 粘粒含量 Clay content/% | 田间持水量 FC/% | 阳离子交换量 CEC/ (cmol·kg-1) | 土壤粘土矿物类型 Soil clay mineral type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 50.97 | 2.86 | 0.77 | 216.36 | 42.82 | 182.36 | 7.05 | 9.36 | 31.26 | 24.87 | 典型黑土(蒙脱石、伊利石) Typical black soil (montmorillonite, illite) |
T2 | 28.50 | 1.68 | 0.50 | 168.51 | 45.53 | 147.25 | 6.98 | 23.00 | 28.96 | 19.64 | |
T3 | 17.72 | 1.12 | 0.39 | 112.32 | 54.21 | 98.64 | 6.69 | 42.11 | 26.37 | 17.53 |
Table 1 Basic physical and chemical properties of 3 different kinds of farmland black soil
处理 Treatment | 有机质 SOM/(g·kg-1) | 全氮 TN/ (g·kg-1) | P / (g·kg-1) 全磷 T | N / (mg·kg-1) 碱解氮 A | 速效磷 AP/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 AK/ (mg·kg-1) | pH | 粘粒含量 Clay content/% | 田间持水量 FC/% | 阳离子交换量 CEC/ (cmol·kg-1) | 土壤粘土矿物类型 Soil clay mineral type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 50.97 | 2.86 | 0.77 | 216.36 | 42.82 | 182.36 | 7.05 | 9.36 | 31.26 | 24.87 | 典型黑土(蒙脱石、伊利石) Typical black soil (montmorillonite, illite) |
T2 | 28.50 | 1.68 | 0.50 | 168.51 | 45.53 | 147.25 | 6.98 | 23.00 | 28.96 | 19.64 | |
T3 | 17.72 | 1.12 | 0.39 | 112.32 | 54.21 | 98.64 | 6.69 | 42.11 | 26.37 | 17.53 |
Fig. 1 Phosphorus adsorption characteristics of different organic black soilsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 2 Phosphorus adsorption-desorption capacity of different levels of organic black soilA:phosphorus adsorption; B: phosphorus desorption. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level
处理 Treatment | Langmuir拟合方程 Langmuir fitting equation | Freundlich拟合方程 Freundlich fitting equation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大吸附量 qm/(mg·g-1) | 常数KL Constant KL | 决定系数 R2 | 常数n Constant n | 常数KF Constant KF | 决定系数 R2 | ||
T1 | 1.22 a | 0.052 a | 0.932** | 2.06 c | 0.030 c | 0.917** | |
T2 | 1.14 b | 0.024 b | 0.916** | 2.56 b | 0.032 b | 0.893** | |
T3 | 0.87 c | 0.025 b | 0.876** | 3.73 a | 0.034 a | 0.728** |
Table 2 Langmuir and Freundlich fitting equation for phosphorus adsorption in black soil ofdifferent organic matter
处理 Treatment | Langmuir拟合方程 Langmuir fitting equation | Freundlich拟合方程 Freundlich fitting equation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大吸附量 qm/(mg·g-1) | 常数KL Constant KL | 决定系数 R2 | 常数n Constant n | 常数KF Constant KF | 决定系数 R2 | ||
T1 | 1.22 a | 0.052 a | 0.932** | 2.06 c | 0.030 c | 0.917** | |
T2 | 1.14 b | 0.024 b | 0.916** | 2.56 b | 0.032 b | 0.893** | |
T3 | 0.87 c | 0.025 b | 0.876** | 3.73 a | 0.034 a | 0.728** |
Fig. 3 Phosphorus adsorption capacity of different black soils under organic matter removal conditionsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level. The small figure represents the adsorption capacity at 0 mg·L-1.
Fig. 4 Phosphorus adsorption capacity of high organic matter black soil with different dosage of organic fertilizerNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | Langmuir方程 Langmuir equation | Freundlich方程 Freundlich equation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大吸附量qm/(mg·g-1) | 常数KL Constant KL | 决定系数 R2 | 常数n Constant n | 常数KF Constant KF | 决定系数 R2 | ||
C1 | 1.65 a | 0.085 a | 0.948** | 1.62 c | 0.030 a | 0.893** | |
C2 | -1.46 c | -0.048 b | 0.955** | 1.89 b | 0.027 ab | 0.741** | |
C3 | -0.82 b | -0.098 c | 0.909** | 3.51 a | 0.019 c | 0.874** |
Table 3 Parameters of phosphorus adsorption isothermal equation for black soil treated with different doses of organic fertilizer
处理 Treatment | Langmuir方程 Langmuir equation | Freundlich方程 Freundlich equation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大吸附量qm/(mg·g-1) | 常数KL Constant KL | 决定系数 R2 | 常数n Constant n | 常数KF Constant KF | 决定系数 R2 | ||
C1 | 1.65 a | 0.085 a | 0.948** | 1.62 c | 0.030 a | 0.893** | |
C2 | -1.46 c | -0.048 b | 0.955** | 1.89 b | 0.027 ab | 0.741** | |
C3 | -0.82 b | -0.098 c | 0.909** | 3.51 a | 0.019 c | 0.874** |
Fig. 5 Phosphorus adsorption capacity of high organic matter black soil with different dosage of organic fertilizerNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 准一级动力方程 Pseudo-first-order kinetics equation | 准二级动力方程 Pseudo-second-order kinetics equation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
磷吸附总量 qe/(mg·g-1) | 常数k1 Constant k1 | 决定系数 R2 | 磷吸附总量 qe/(mg·g-1) | 常数k2 Constant k2 | 决定系数 R2 | ||
C1 | 0.161 a | 0.058 a | 0.941** | 0.166 a | 0.005 b | 0.972** | |
C2 | 0.148 b | 0.045 c | 0.944** | 0.151 b | 0.006 a | 0.965** | |
C3 | 0.132 c | 0.054 b | 0.938** | 0.135 c | 0.006 a | 0.969** |
Table 4 Kinetic parameters of phosphorus adsorption in high organic matter farmland soil with different doses of organic fertilizer were added
处理 Treatment | 准一级动力方程 Pseudo-first-order kinetics equation | 准二级动力方程 Pseudo-second-order kinetics equation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
磷吸附总量 qe/(mg·g-1) | 常数k1 Constant k1 | 决定系数 R2 | 磷吸附总量 qe/(mg·g-1) | 常数k2 Constant k2 | 决定系数 R2 | ||
C1 | 0.161 a | 0.058 a | 0.941** | 0.166 a | 0.005 b | 0.972** | |
C2 | 0.148 b | 0.045 c | 0.944** | 0.151 b | 0.006 a | 0.965** | |
C3 | 0.132 c | 0.054 b | 0.938** | 0.135 c | 0.006 a | 0.969** |
Fig. 6 Soil physical and chemical indexes under different levels of organic fertilizerNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
1 | LIU S N, MENG J, JIANG L L,et al.. Rice husk biochar impacts soil phosphorous availability,phosphatase activities and bacterial community characteristics in three different soil types [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2017,116:12-22. |
2 | 展晓莹,任意,张淑香,等.中国主要土壤有效磷演变及其与磷平衡的响应关系[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(23):4728-4737. |
ZHAN X Y, REN Y, ZHANG S X,et al.. Changes in olsen phosphorus concentration and its response to phosphorus balance in the main types of soil in China [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2015,48(23):4728-4737. | |
3 | 张宝贵, 李贵桐. 土壤生物在土壤磷有效化中的作用[J]. 土壤学报, 1998, 38(1): 104-111. |
ZHANG B G, LI G T. Roles of soil organisms on the enhancement of plant availability of soil phosphorus [J]. Acta Pedol. Sin., 1998, 38(1): 104-111. | |
4 | DOU Z X, RAMBERG C F, TOTH J D, et al.. Phosphorus speciation and sorption-desorption characteristics in heavily manured soils [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2009, 73(1): 93-101. |
5 | ZHANG S L, HUFFMAN T, ZHANG X Y,et al.. Spatial distribution of soil nutrient at depth in black soil of Northeast China:a case study of soil available phosphorus and total phosphorus [J]. J. Soils Sediments, 2014,14(11):1775-1789. |
6 | DEBICKA M, KOCOWICZ A, WEBER J, et al.. Organic matter effects on phosphorus sorption in sandy soils [J]. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 2016,62: 840-855. |
7 | DU Z Y, WANG Q H, LIU F C,et al.. Movement of phosphorus in a calcareous soil as affected by humic acid [J]. Pedosphere, 2013,23(2):229-235. |
8 | HIRADATE S, UCHIDA N. Effects of soil organic matter on pH-dependent phosphate sorption by soils [J]. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 2004, 50: 665-675. |
9 | YANG X Y, CHEN X W, YANG X T. Effect of organic matter on phosphorus adsorption and desorption in a black soil from Northeast China [J]. Soil Till. Res., 2019,187:85-91. |
10 | YAO Q, LIU J J, YU Z H,et al.. Three years of biochar amendment alters soil physiochemical properties and fungal community composition in a black soil of Northeast China [J]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2017,110:56-67. |
11 | ZHOU J, GUAN D W, ZHOU B K,et al..Influence of 34-years of fertilization on bacterial communities in an intensively cultivated black soil in Northeast China [J]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2015,90:42-51. |
12 | WU Q H, ZHANG S X, ZHU P,et al.. Characterizing differences in the phosphorus activation coefficient of three typical cropland soils and the influencing factors under long-term fertilization [J/OL].PLoS One,2017,12(5):e0176437 [2023-01-22]. . |
13 | 杨云辉, 焦亚, 杨柱琼, 等. 白魔芋芋鞭不同剂量有机肥试验初探[J].农业开发与装备, 2019 (11): 126. |
14 | YAN J L, JIANG T, YAO Y,et al.. Preliminary investigation of phosphorus adsorption onto two types of iron oxide-organic matter complexes [J]. J. Environ. Sci., 2016,42:152-162. |
15 | HAFIZ N, ADITY S M, MITU S F, et al.. Effect of manure types on phosphorus sorption characteristics of an agricultural soil in Bangladesh [J]. Cogent Food Agric., 2016, 2 (1): 127-160. |
16 | 乔德波. 施用有机肥对设施菜地土壤养分、重金属含量及其分布特征的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2014. |
QIAO D B. Effects of organic fertilizer application on soil nutrient and heavy metal contents and their distribution characteristics in vegetable fields [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2014. | |
17 | KAISER K, GUGGENBERGER G. Mineral surfaces and soil organic matter [J]. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 2010, 54 (2): 219-236. |
18 | 李悦.不同有机质含量黑土磷吸附-解吸特性的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2018. |
LI Y. Study on adsorption-desorption properties of different organic matter black soil phosphorus [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2018. | |
19 | 夏瑶, 娄运生, 杨超光, 等. 几种水稻土对磷的吸附与解吸特性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(11):1369-1374. |
XIA Y, LOU Y S, YANG C G, et al.. Characteristics of phosphate adsorption and desorption in paddy soils [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2002, 35(11): 1369-1374. | |
20 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].第3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000: 25-114. |
21 | 程敏华,梁俭,蓝品滩,等.百色市不同土地利用类型土壤对磷吸附特性研究[J].山东化工,2018,47(24):190-192. |
CHENG M H, LIANG J, LAN P T,et al.. Phosphorus adsorption characteristics of soil under different utilization ways in Baise [J].Shandong Chem. Ind.,2018,47(24):190-192. | |
22 | 韩旭,吴东洋,王新刚.不同土壤对磷的吸附特性研究[J].现代农业科技,2011(20):285-286. |
23 | 丁武泉,何家洪,刘新敏,等.有机质对三峡库区水体中土壤胶体颗粒凝聚影响机制研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):166-171. |
DING W Q, HE J H, LIU X M, et al.. Effect of organic matter on aggregation of soil colloidal particles in water bodies of three gorge reservoir region [J].J. Soil Water Conserv., 2017,31(4):166-171. | |
24 | BORGGAARD O K, JDRGENSEN S S, MOBERG J P, et al.. Influence of organic matter on phosphate adsorption by aluminium and iron oxides in sandy soils [J]. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 1990, 41 (3): 443-449. |
25 | BORIE F, ZUNINO H, MARTANEZ L, et al.. Associations and inositol phosphates in some chilean volcanic soils of temperate regions [J]. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 2008, 20 (17-18): 1881-1894. |
26 | 罗安程, 章永松, 孙羲. 有机肥对大麦根系生理代谢和磷吸收的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 1996, 5(3): 9-12. |
LUO A C, ZHANG Y S, SUN X. Effect of organic manure on phosphate absorption and physiological metabolism of barley roots [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 1996,5(3): 9-12. | |
27 | 田艳洪,赵晓锋,刘玉娥,等.不同有机肥用量对大豆植株生长及产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2018,37(4):578-584. |
TIAN Y H, ZHAO X F, LIU Y E,et al.. Effects of different dosages of organic fertilizer on the growth and yield of soybean [J]. Soybean Sci., 2018,37(4):578-584. | |
28 | 闫金龙,吴文丽,江韬,等.土壤组分对磷形态和磷吸附-解吸的影响:基于三峡库区消落带落干期土壤[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(3):1124-1131. |
YAN J L, WU W L, JIANG T, et al.. Effect of organic matter and iron oxides on phosphorus forms and adsorption-desorption on dry-period soils in the water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir [J].China Environ. Sci.,2019,39(3):1124-1131. | |
29 | YANG W, GU S Y, XIN Y,et al..Compost addition enhanced hyphal growth and sporulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi without affecting their community composition in the soil [J/OL].Front. Microbiol.,2018,9:169 [2023-01-22].. |
30 | DAVIS J A. Adsorption of natural dissolved organic matter at the oxide/water interface [J]. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1982, 46 (11):2381-2393. |
31 | 梁佳辉,张少良,穆林林,等.东北典型黑土区坡面土壤速效磷空间分布规律[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(1):90-95, 102. |
LIANG J H, ZHANG S L, MU L L, et al.. Spatial heterogeneity of soil available phosphorus on typical slope in black soil of northeastern China [J]. Res. Soil Water Conserv., 2017,24(1):90-95, 102. | |
32 | 吕鉴于, 高文俊, 郝鲜俊, 等. 不同有机肥对矿区复垦土壤磷素矿化特征研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39 (4): 59-67. |
LYU J Y, GAO W J, HAO X J, et al.. Study on phosphorus mineralization characteristics of reclaimed soil with different organic fertilizers [J]. J. Irrig. Drain., 2020, 39 (4): 59-67. | |
33 | 李清华.畜禽有机肥磷的形态、养分矿化及流失潜力评价研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2013,19(3):73-75. |
34 | 王敏锋,严正娟,陈硕,等.施用粪肥和沼液对设施菜田土壤磷素累积与迁移的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(7):1351-1359. |
WANG M F, YAN Z J, CHEN S,et al.. Effects of manure and biogas slurry applications on phosphorus accumulation and mobility in organic vegetable soil under greenhouse [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2016,35(7):1351-1359. | |
35 | 刘彦伶,李渝,张萌,等.长期不同施肥对黄壤磷素吸附-解吸特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(3):450-459. |
LIU Y L, LI Y, ZHANG M, et al.. Effects of long-term fertilization on phosphorus adsorption and desorption characters in yellow soil [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert.,2021,27(3):450-459. | |
36 | GUO Y J, LI G D. Nitrogen leaching and phosphorus accumulation in a perennial pasture after composted goat manure was topdressed and incorporated in the Three Gorges Region [J]. J. Soils Sediments, 2012,12(5):674-682. |
37 | 杨燕玲.农田土壤对磷的吸附和解吸特性研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2019,47(1):4-5, 16. |
YANG Y L. Advances in phosphorus adsorption and desorption of farmland soils [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2019,47(1):4-5, 16. | |
38 | 蔡越桐.添加有机物料及解磷菌对黑土磷吸附性及其有效性的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2019. |
CAI Y T. Effect of adding organic material and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on phosphorus adsorption and availability of black soil [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2019. |
[1] | Xingsong WANG, Na WANG, Yu DU, Peng ZHOU, Ge WANG, Meng JIA, Zhaoli XU, Yuxiang BAI. Effects of Organic Fertilizer on Organic Matter Composition and Microbial Community Structure of Tobacco-Growing Soil in Yuxi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 201-212. |
[2] | Shifang WANG, Haiyan SONG. Study on Characteristics of Visible and Near Infrared Reflectance Spectra of Soil Organic Matter [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 183-188. |
[3] | Xiuli HAN, Jiawei LI, Jie ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Replacing Part of Chemical Fertilizer on Grape Growth and Soil Fertility [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 195-205. |
[4] | Jingjuan GAO, Chenyu ZHU, Yuqin KE, Chaoyuan ZHENG, Chunying LI, Wenqing LI. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application Period on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in Flue-cured Tobacco Under Tobacco-Rice Rotation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 157-165. |
[5] | Yancheng WANG, Jiyue ZHANG, Shuaiqi FENG, Xue LIANG, Zhen ZHANG, Weiwei DONG, Wenxiu JI. Effects of Exogenous PGPR Combined with Organic Fertilizers on Soil Properties and Stress Resistance of Ginseng Under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 196-202. |
[6] | Xingsheng YIN, Lingfeng BAO, Yongyu PU, Jiali SUN, Qing ZHANG, Haiping LI, Mingying YANG, Yueping LIN, Huaixin WANG, Yonghong HE, Peiwen YANG. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Bio-organic Fertilization on Tobacco Soil Characteristics and Tobacco Bacterial Wilt Control [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 122-131. |
[7] | Feifan HOU, Xiaowen ZHANG, Jiaqi WANG, Jianzhen ZHANG, Kaiquan LI, Xuebin YIN. Effect of Selenium Fertilizer Application Position on Physiological Characters and Selenium Accumulation in Wheat [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 144-152. |
[8] | Yanjun KE, Yumeng ZHANG, Yanjie GUO, Lijuan ZHANG, Zitao ZHANG, Yanzhi JI. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer Combined with Subsoiling on Farmland Soil Fertility and Crop Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 157-166. |
[9] | Lu MENG, Jingwen FAN, Xinyu SAI, Lusheng ZENG, Xiangyun SONG, Dejie CUI. Effects of Lime on Soil Improvement and Plant Growth in Apple Orchards [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 197-204. |
[10] | Jiangang JIN, Zaifang TIAN, Minna ZHENG, Jiahui KANG. Effect of Different Fertilization Measures on the Diversity of Soil Bacteria Communities in Fed oats (Avena sativa L.) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 152-160. |
[11] | Juxian GUO, Bishan OUYANG, Guihua LI, Mei FU, Wenlong LUO, Shanwei LUO, Meilian LU. Effect of Bio-organic Fertilizers on Quality and Soil of Continuous Crop Chinese Flowering Cabbage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 182-191. |
[12] | Yan KUAI, Xinyue SU, Jinfeng WANG, Zhiyong FAN, Jianhua LI, Nan SUN, Jiuquan ZHANG, Minggang XU. Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen in Typical Tobacco-planting Areas of Dali [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 177-185. |
[13] | Ting ZHOU, Songlin SUN, Haiying ZHU, Caiwang PENG. Effect of Moisture Content on Bond Flows of Black Soldier Fly Larvae Biotransformation Pig Manure Organic Fertilizer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 126-136. |
[14] | Hongyan WU, Miao YU, Jian FENG, Hui LIU. Effect of Phosphorus Solubilizing Bio-fertilizer on Soil Phosphorus Availability and Pepper Yield in Greenhouse [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(10): 189-197. |
[15] | Kaihong XIANG, Xu LYU, Chuanhai SHU, Riqu WUZA, Jinyue ZHANG, Yuemei ZHU, Zhiyuan YANG, Yongjian SUN, Jun MA. Effects of Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Precision Hill-direct-seeding Rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 149-165. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||